HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-09-2006 Regular Meeting3779
STATE OF ALABAMA )(
COUNTY OF BALDWIN )(
The City Council, City of Fairhope, met in regular session at
5:30 p.m., Fairhope Municipal Complex Council Chamber,
161 North Section Street, Fairhope, Alabama 36532, on
Thursday, 9 March 2006.
Present were Council President Robert C. Gentle, Councilmembers: Debbie W.
Quinn, Daniel Stankoski, Cecil Christenberry, and Michael A. Ford; Mayor Timothy M.
Kant, City Attorney Marion E. Wynne, and City Clerk/Treasurer Geniece W. Johnson. No
one was absent.
There being a quorum present, Council President Gentle called the meeting to
order. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited, and Councilmember Christenberry, gave the
invocation. Councilmember Christenberry moved to approve minutes of the 20 February
2006, regular meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously by
voice vote.
Mayor's Comments and Staff Reports
There were no comments or staff reports by Mayor Kant.
Council President Gentle asked City Clerk Geniece W. Johnson to read the
following motion from 20 February 2006 regular City Council meeting regarding the Wal-
Mart issue:
Councilmember Quinn moved to have Mr. Wynne to look into the suspension of the
building permit already issued, to get a list of questions for the engineers to address the
concerns of the Hydraulic (drainage) and Traffic study, and to place this as an item on the
next regular City Council meeting.
Council President Gentle explained that this is the order and the items listed in the above
motion that would be addressed with regard to the Wal-Mart issue. Council President
Gentle also introduced the persons that would be addressing the concerns of the Wal-Mart
issues.
l . Caine O'Rear with Hand Arendall, LLC - Outside Attorney for the City of Fairhope
2. Donna Herndon with Thompson `engineering was hired by the City for a second opinion.
3. Jerry O'Brien president of J.L. O'Brien and Associates - representing Wal-Mart
4. Sam Irby with Irby and Heard LLC — An Attorney representing Wal-Mart.
5. Allan Chason with Chason & Chason - An Attorney representing Wal-Mart.
6. Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. — Wal-Mart's engineer representative was unable to
attend this meeting due to a scheduling conflict.
3780
09 March 2006
City Attorney Marion E. Wynne addressed the City Council and expressed that the City
does not have the jurisdiction or authority to suspend or revoke a building permit. Mr.
Wynne explained that if a building permit was found improperly issued because all the
requirements of the city was not met then the building official could suspend a building
permit. Otherwise building permit issues does come before the City Council, but issue
such as this would go before the circuit court as a Writ Mendacious and the court would
make a decision. Caine O'Rear expressed that his opinion was consistent with Mr.
Wynne.
John Seeger a retired engineer addressed the City Council and the audience with the
following questions:
JOHN SEEGER'S QUESTIONS ON NEXT PAGE
3781
09 March 2006
Stormwater Questions:
A. Kimley-Horn stormwater runoff is discussed in three time phases, Pre-, Post-, and Future Development:
Peak flow rates
Outflow Volumes
Entry to Stream
(a) Pre -Development
4,085,63 cfs
1,805,731 cu ft
20,626,620 cu ft
(b) Post Development
3,917.88 cfs
2,185,863 cu ft
20,892,190 cu ft
(c) Future Development
3,880.27 cfs
5,373,933 cu ft
21,391,840 cu ft
The peak flow rates are discussed in the report, which stresses the benefit of slowing down the runoff from
the Wal-Mart site. The outflow volumes are not discussed, but have been extracted from the computer runs
presented in the drainage plan.
Question 1. Where does the value of 20,626,620 cu ft pre -development runoff volume for the 623 acre basin
come from? Or if calculated, by what procedure?
Question 2. Why does only about 70% of the increased outflow volume due to Wal-Mart show up in the
volume increase at the point of "Entry to Stream?" This is where it exits the River Mill subdivision.
There is approx 380,000 cu ft outflow from Wal-Mart, but only a 266,000 cu ft increase at "Entry to Stream.")
R. Kimley-Horn says that "the dry detention pond is sized to accommodate runoff from the entire site for the
100-year storm." The required maximum storage capacity of the pond is calculated to be 615,683 cu fl, but the
hydrographic volume (area under the curve) in the same calculations is shown as 1,398,496 cu fl.
Question 3: Is the higher volume of stormwater disposed of as outflow from the pond? Over the spillway,
or to what discharge point? Why isn't the storage capacity of the pond greater?
C. Future development is mentioned and covered in some calculations, as shown in the above table.
Question 4. The remaining acreage for Future Development would appear to be relatively small , the
present Farmers Market plus another parcel along Hwy 181 south of it.
What is the explanation for the very great increase in Outflow Volume of over 5 million cubic feet, and why does
it not all show up at the "Entry to Stream?" The implication is that the undisturbed acreage along the east and
south property lines may not to be kept that way as a buffer. Could the buffer land be developed by Wal-Mart?
Question 5. Why did Kinley-Horn run the Future Development calcs twice, identified first as Downstream
Analysis — Future, then again as Post-Overdesign-ALDOT? Each time they found that pond capacity required
would be about 1,215,776 cu ft. Currently the detention pond is shown as 615,863 cu ft storage capacity, about
half the size in the Future calculations. Is that also keyed to using buffer land for additional commercial
structures and more parking?
D. The 20 million cubic feet volume of stormwater shown entering the stream above, will grow larger as runoff
is added along this CowPen tributary flowing down to Quail Creek subdivision and the two lakes.
Question 6. Can you advise us what you think the effect will be on Quail Creek, and at this flow rate and
volume will the retaining dam and spillway be endangered in a 100-year 24-hour storm event?
If multi -day hurricane feeder band storm events occur, instead of the 24-hour 100 year defined storm used for
analysis, how might this change the risk and preparedness measures we need to take? Would more lakes
designed to detain stormflow be needed? The water levels in the two lakes now protect the adjoining properties,
and should not be raised higher, so would we need to impound the water by some other means?
3782
09 March 2006
Ms. Herndon stated that the water coming out will come out at the same rate, and will
store up and be discharged at a slower rate or longer period of time.
Mr. O'Brien stated that in the spirit of cooperation regarding the stormwater. Wal-Mart
has designed a system that can handle a 100-year storm event. This is four times the
requirement under the City's ordinance.
Mr. Seeger stated that River Mill subdivision is getting the brunt of this project and would
like to know, whose problem is this, the city or the county?
John Chislett addressed the City Council and audience with the following concerns
on traffic. Barry Fulford Building Official stated that he received Mr. Chislett's questions
about 3:00 p.m., and a lot of Mr. Chislett's concerns can be addressed, but not without
some research. Mr. Fulford also stated that the City has been working with the Alabama
Department of Transportation, which has given a conceptual okay to the traffic study. No
representation for ALDOT was present.
JOHN CHISLETT QUESTIONS ARE ON THE NEXT THREE PAGES
3783
09 March 2006
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR WAL-MART PERMIT
Fairhope Alabama has -historically been a small citizen oriented village with emphasis on
quality of life including'safety, beauty and preservation of village atmosphere... This is
clearly stated in its strategic plan. As a result Fairhope has been featured in many
publications one of the top places to live in America.
Obviously, these who desire this life style move to towns like Fairhope and Dousing is
created to accommodate them. One result is increased traffic. In addition Faihope_ is on
the two major state highways connecting Mobile and West to towns and beach
communities to the south and west. Currently both these highways are at capacity. In an.
AL,DOT 2004 study, 98 had 22000 and 181 had 12000 cars daily running through
Fairhope. 'These numbers have increased dramatically since then.
New housing scheduled .for the next five years will double this volume with no road
construction relief scheduled for approximately seven years.
Vtiai-mart if allowed in grills essentially double crrent 191 traffic overnight_ 1TE.
volume for ZC►0 90 ft store is Approx.I IOQO fixip�'da11 : :
_ ,
Therefore Fairhope building regulations require that a project whiob will have a major
material effect and impact on tragic and departure from master plan is subject to stringent
permitting requirements. Specifically:
Municipal code 7-17 (Traffic requirements) requires compliance as follows;
1. A traffic study (If over 2000 trips daily) by an agent SELECTED BY TIDE
CITY and paid for by applicant to include data and analysis as follows:
Projected 24 hr ADT, .
Pear traffic in morning and evening peak hours including inbound and
outbound trips. Typical hour offfpeak.
Assignment of trips to streets
Impact on all areas affected ,areas etc.
Intersection turning movements and traffic counts: on all projected
impacted intersections.
Additional requirements per section 7-17
,Building permit is only issued after full compliance with 7-17
3784
09 March 2006
We have a document titled Traffic impact Analysis presented to Fairhope dated January
2005. AI.DOT, Mr. Mick Amberger advised me that this was a conceptual plan for
ingress and egress to proposed sight. It is not a traffic study. Therefore the following
questions are respectfully submitted:
Does Kiznley--born have contract with city for any Find of Traffic Study?
Which city officials met with 1- H for preliminary discussions?
.Who selected K H to do study and who is paying them?
Who set criteria and study objectives?
What preliminary work was done with city officials to determine areas of
concern and scope of study? What current traffic data and new data including
approved now subdivision locations and number of homes was provided and
by who.
What was methodology and who approved it.
Who participated in those preliminary meetings?
Where are minutes of those xeetings?
What quatifications were presented to > airhope. Officials? Le. what other
traffic studies bave they conducted and who paid for those?
With respect to Wal-mart projected traffic and current traffic conditions:
Set forth in K-H conceptual plan:
Where is authenticated recorded data for counting equipment and. other
intersection counts?
Where is raw dated counting data for 24 hour period? This means all
through and turn data. supplied_ Where did these: counts comp: from?
What is counted current total, 24hrtraffic on 191? What is current AM
and PNI peak traffic and back up at all intersections?
What percentage increase will ITE 813 average trip volume
have on each of these current volumes?
3785
09 March 2006
What percentage increase will ITE 813 average trip volume
have on each of these current volumes?
What consideration in through time and interrupt time was applied to \
school bus stops garbage +collection and local parent and student trip data
for the 3000 students arriving by bus and car to the three schools located
off CR's 44, 32 and 48?
Pictures of various intersections obviously taken in summer but study
claims counts were made on 12/01/05, Please explain.
Where are wal-mart customers coming from and on what roads and what
is projected daily traffic on each of feeder roads after + construction?
How were projected entering and leaving trips by roads determined.
Finally figures in conceptual study vary widely with those counted manually by myself
and other individuals. Why is this case?
3786
09 March 2006
Mr. Chislett stated that he did not find adequate data within the traffic study, and no left
and right turns data was provided.
Council President Gentle read the following letter from Ric and Sandra Bennett.
Ric and Sandra Bennett
20945 Lowry Drive
Fairhope, AL 36532
To Whom It May Concern:
We would like to express our concern in relation to the traffic situation that will affect
our area when the proposed Wal-Mart is built. Our neighborhood is located on County
Road 30 approximately one half mile west_ of State Highway 181. This intersection
(County Road-30 and -State Highway 181)lsrs�than oienlfrorri the site wherWa1- "Y _� __.
Mart will be located. Our neighborhood is one of many located on Gayfer Avenue
between Highway 98 and State Highway 181. We experience a high volume of traffic
that in the past has prompted the placement of two flashing yellow lights at the
intersections of Bishop Road and Highway 13 both of which were sites where major
accidents involving loss of life have occurred. It is of great concern to us that serious
consideration be given to the potential problems which will occur at County Road 30 and
State Highway 181 and that a red light is placed there for betterment of all concerned. It
only stands to reason that more traffic will be the byproduct of the growth occurring in
our city and that even more will use County Road 30 to access State Highway 181 as
traffic on Fairhope Avenue becomes even more congested than it is already. We would
truly appreciate your consideration concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
Ric Bennett
Sandra Bennett
The Council President called for a 10 minutes recess at 6:58 p.m. The City Council
resumed business at 7:10 p.m.
Mr. O'Brien's stated that Wal-Mart wanted to be a good corporate citizen and that they
would be available to consider any requests.
3787
09 March 2006
Public Hearing was held as advertised on a proposed ordinance to amend the
Zoning Ordinance No. 1253. Councilmember Quinn introduced in writing Ordinance No.
1295. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of this ordinance. An
ordinance to zone Charles L. and Marie Dean's property to R-5 Multi Family Residential
concurrent with annexation into the City of Fairhope, and with the following restrictions:
1. Any development on the property shall be limited to sixty-two (62) units.
2. Shall maintain a maximum of four (4) units per building allowed.
3. A privacy fence shall be built along the southern boundary of the property.
This property is located at 8174 Gayfer Road, Fairhope, Alabama. Parcel A contains 8_3
acres more or less 46-05-16-0-000-010.000, and Parcel B contains 2.0 acres more or less
46-05-16-0-000-010.003. Gateway Construction Co.
Council President Gentle opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m.
Margaret McKenna a resident of 903 Diehl Avenue addressed the City Council with
concerns that she did not know that this public hearing was taking place for through that
this item could not come for before the City Council for one year. Summer Woodson the
City Planner explained that this item was not denied by the City Council, but was sent
back to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the regular city council meeting of
January 9, 2006. However, had this item been denied by the city Council the item could
not come back before the City Council for one year. Ms. McKenna stated that she did not
have a problem with the rezoning as along as the above restrictions are in place.
Mary Jean Barnhill addressed the City Council requesting that the City Council consider
the rezoning of this property.
The public hearing was closed at 7:22 p.m.
In order to take immediate action Councilmember Christenberry moved for immediate
consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Stankoski, motion passed for immediate
consideration passed unanimously by the following votes: AYE -Quinn, Stankoski,
Christenberry, Ford and Gentle. NAY -none. Councilmember Quinn moved for final
adoption of Ordinance No. 1295. Seconded by Councilmember Christenberry, motion for
final adoption passed unanimously by the following votes: AYE -Quinn, Stankoski,
Christenberry, Ford and Gentle. NAY -none.
Councilmember Ford moved for the final adoption of Ordinance No. 1296 an
ordinance amending the following ordinances:
k -1
09 March 2006
Fairhope Code - Certain Section of Chapter 7 - Division 2. Solid Waste, Trash and other
Deposits, and Certain Sections of Chapter 21 - Article VI Garbage and Trash Collection
and Disposal - Division 1. Generally — Sec. 21-76 City dump — Prohibited usage
• Ordinance No. 958 Adopted May 9, 1994
• Ordinance No. 842 Adopted September 11, 1989
• Ordinance No. 878 Adopted May 13, 1991
• Ordinance No. 1044 Adopted February 8, 1999
• Ordinance No. 859 Adopted August 13, 1990
• Ordinance No. 1266 Adopted September 26, 2005
Seconded by Councilmember Christenberry, motion for final adoption passed unanimously
by the following votes: AYE -Quinn, Stankoski, Christenberry, Ford and Gentle. NAY -
none.
Public Works Director Jennifer Fidler announced that one of the new automated garbage
trucks is parked outside for public viewing and a demonstration.
Councilmember Quinn introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution, a resolution accepting the public streets, public right-of-way, and all
of Fairhope's public utilities within Summer Lake Phase I Subdivision for maintenance.
Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously by voice vote.
RESOLUTION NO. 1279
WHEREAS, the Owners of Summer Lake Phase I desire to have all public streets and public right-of-ways dedicated on
the plat filed for record in the Probate Records of Baldwin County, Alabama, on Slide 2224A, and all Fairhope public
utilities located in public right-of-ways accepted for maintenance by the City of Fairhope, Alabama, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope, Alabama, has received notice from the engineers of the project that the design and
capacity of the public improvements have been designed in conformance with City requirements as indicated on the
recorded plat, and;
WHEREAS, the General Superintendent has indicated that the improvements meet City requirements, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope, Alabama, is not and in no manner will be responsible for the maintenance of common
areas in the subdivision as indicated on the recorded plat, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope, Alabama, has received from the owners of Summer Lake Phase I maintenance bonds
for the public improvements constructed for a period of 2 years, and;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE,
ALABAMA that the public improvements indicated herein for Summer Lake Phase I are hereby accepted for public
maintenance subject to the bond posted.
Adopted, this 91h
Attest:
eniece W. Johnson, City
09 March 2006
Councilmember Christenberry introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption
of the following resolution, a resolution authorizing reimbursement expenditures of the
Municipal Pier damaged by Hurricane Katrina August 29, 2005, and the Library project —
City `s second 1.5 million with a potential General Obligation Warrant 2007 or any future
GOW. Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously by voice vote.
RESOLUTION NO. 1280
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope is hereby considering taking a General Obligation Warrant for
certain projects.
WHEREAS, the following projects shall be included in the Bond Issue 2007, and all expenditures
prior to the completion of the Bond Issue process included for reimbursement:
Municipal Pier damaged by Hurricane Katrina August 29, 2005.
Library Project — City second 1.5 Million
NOW BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Fairhope hereby express official intent to reimburse any
cash expenditures from the proceeds of General Obligation Warrant.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE,
ALABAMA, that Mayor Timothy M. Kant is hereby authorized to reimburse the City from cash
expended with Bond Issue Monies of 2007 for the above listed projects.
DULY ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF March , 2006.
Ti thy M. ant, Mayor
Attest:
eniece W. Johnson, Ci erk
Councilmember Quinn moved to grant Change Order # 3 of the Library Project by
decreasing the contract by $ 53,706.00 for valued engineering. Seconded by
Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously by voice vote.
Dr. Hollis Wiseman addressed the City Council to give an update on the monies
being collected for the Library Project. Dr. Wiseman reported that the pledges are going
in, and think that we are going great. Dr. Wiseman also reported that another 1.5 million
will be needed to finish everything including the FF&E. Dr. Wiseman also reported that a
grant has been applied for, for 13 new computers for the children's section.
3790
a
IL
W
Cn
U
a'
Z
Q
09 March 2006
Mayor Kant stated that this Council will have to look at possibly completing,the upstairs;
however, the City Council/Finance Committee will have to meet in the near future to look
at the city's finances before a decision can be made.
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
0 0
N'O
N
0
0
O
0 p
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
C.n
CO
0
CCO
O
O
O
M m
O
^
O
66
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O Cn
O O
try'
U
J
Z
r
0
".
0
Cfl
0
Cn
^
N
4
LQ
N
CO
M
O
O
M
O
C`7
V'
CO
N
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O I�
V C'
Co
J
O
N
N
OCO
N
CO
O
V
6)
Cb
C
O V'
CO
,
a
Q
� a
W
o
•��
o
LO
0
vo
-It
O
'
vo
V
O
—
CD
qi
F-�
J
m
Q
V
:.
W
r
M^
O
t
2
IL
00
f. i
N
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O
0
0
0
~
O
LO
N
I
i�
1l
C6
CO
0
6)
0
0�
O
I-
0
,T
O
to
O
Lr)
O
CD
(6
OM
COMLO
O
1-
'D
LO
r
p
LO
OO
0
0
0
n
N
Cl
M
N
c�
O
c7
V
N
N
N
CI)
O
I� _
6)
t
m
O
CO
6)
t-
LO
of
6)
Cfl Cfl
O
CO
O
O
COp
O
Z
O
N
0.
O
r
h
r
N
.-
N
ZM J
Q
V
�O
t0
W J
N
C
W W
0 �
O
Ln
—
cr
C)
W
U
+
o
o
c6
o
I
co
M
—
. ,
I t,
'—
0 W
m Z
o'
LL
Q'
Ln
v
ui
Q
CO
�
ui
g
�
ui
o
{,
oo
=
d
LL
m
Q
Z
F
J-
EA
'
CA
Cf3
QOW
IUOZ))=
W
N
`-
O�
�
JV
t--
C
W
W-
Op
U Y
O
N
Q.
_N
U
m
V)
�
',.S` C
Z
J
J J
J
z?
Q�
LLJ
Q
J J
J
Z
O}
O
(n (� (� (n U) (�
m
(�
W
�
Cet
=
F--
m
J J J J JJ
t
JUp_
N9
W
U)
Z
~
Z
Z
O
O
Z C7
n
Z
m
O
0
Z
=
m 2
Q
O
o♦
Q J
O
C)
Q
W O
J O
o
W O
O U>
z
w
C f
d
Z
Q Z
W
N
J Z
Q Z
N
J Z
O
Z
Z
Q
2
v
QY
U
O
z0U
OZ�
a_U)
d�
N
0
O
pZ
Off—
Z-
LLN
O
O
Z �
W
of
Q
_O�
z
CA
W
¢ Q
Z
O N
J
W
J
J
z 0
O~
Q
w
Q Z
W
U
i
O
LL
�
1-,-I
.LJ
UF-
U
J
_J I�
J
W
W W
0
ZO��
�_�Fn LL
W
(�ZF-NQ~JUF
�-
OQ�O~�OJF-
Q O
J
J O
CO
U
Q
f- Y
Z O� Y
O,
0
a
W Y
z
U
D
N m>_
O
O
U
-
— i-'-i
ii
JWOOWQOn-W
UCna
J
g rr
OwUG�CDm
z
O_Z __
J
_
cn
O_z
W�JOW�
W m2p
m _s
z
OW-
0
_
_ LU
Q O
11 JWF-
Uc)U)CL20LJO
_�
J
OOW
—
WQO
�_
WU
WO
O
O
C.N
NV
O
m
O O O
O
m
N
CO
F,,,
O
O
O
n
(Y)
6
rn
rn
0
0
N
c�
0
l
s
CITY OF FAIRHOPE
USDA NRCS.EWPP
AGREEMENT NO.: 69-4101-5-49
-.
Hutchins -on, Moore & Rauch, LLC BIDDER #1 BIDDER #2
Engineers ♦ Surveyors ♦ Land Planners H.E. NEWELL, INC. ASPHALT SUPPLY, LLC
ITEM# DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
NORTH CREEK DRIVE / FLY CREEK - FAI-0405-05
702 SEEDING AND MULCHING LS 1 1,775.00 3,000.00
708 MOBILIZATION AND LS 1 y 565,00 Y 6,000.00
DEMOBILIZATION T
723 EARTHFILL CY TBM 10 $ 105.00 1,050.00 32.50 325.00
761 RIPRAP, CLASS 2 TON 55 $ 82.66 4,546.30 83.44 4,589.20
795 GEOTEXTILE FILTER SY 80 $ 5.34 427.20 7.00 560.00
BLANKET, 7 OZ., NONWOVEN
SUBTOTAL NORTH 'CREEK DRIVE/FLY CREEK j 8,363.501 14 474.20
613 JOHNSON AVENUE - FAI-0405-07
701 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 3,000.00 8,000.00
702 SEEDING AND MULCHING LS 1 1,775.00r�' 4_000.00
705 POLLUTION CONTROL LS 1 +I
2,875.00
708 MOBILIZATION AND LS 1 3,000.00
1,600.7,000.00
DEMOBILIZATION F
720. LAND SHAPING AND LS 1y
5650.004,G 3,500.00
GRADING _ r
723 EARTHFILL CY TBM 100 $ 13.00 1,300.00 $ 50.50 5,050.00
730 DEBRIS REMOVAL LS 1 2.825.00 2,500.00
761 RIPRAP, CLASS 2 TON 1_1 50 $ 82.66 12,399.00 $ 83.44 12,516.00
795 IGEOTEXTILE FILTER SY 185 $ 5.34 987.90 $ 7.00 1,295.00
BLANKET, 7 OZ., NONWOVEN
SUBTOTAL 613 JOHNSON AVENUE 32 411.901 1 46 861.00
I111111111 [T nT1I".�1 �
702
SEEDING AND MULCHING
LS
1.,'
vV��1,Y - 1 /YI-VYV
J-VO
1,775.00
2,000.00
r , —
703
STRUCTURE REMOVAL
LS
1
565.00
EXISTING PIPE
18,700.00
708
MOBILIZATION AND
LS6,000.00
11,600-00
DEMOBILIZATION
.. r .�.s.
720
LAND SHAPING AND
LS
1
3,000.00
G
GRADING
a
3,500.00
{.
77'.)
All TLI1r1I/ i INAC[�Tl'1A,r
GRAVEL (#57 STONE'
761 IRIPRAP, CLASS 2
FEBRUARY 16, 2006
V I 'tVV y Io.Vv o,uuu.uu
TON 220 $ 82.66 18,185.20
Page 2 of 3
2.151 1,100.00
00.+4� ItS,J�b.tSU�
F2860\2360
USDA MRCS EWPP
AGREEMENT NO.: 69-4101-5-49
I Hutchinson, Moore & Rauch, LLC
BIDDER #1
BIDDER #2
Engineers ♦ Surveyors ♦ Land Planners
H.E. NEWEL.L, INC.
ASPHALT SUPPLY, LLC
ITEM#
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QTY
UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
U°NIT PRICE
AMOUNT
795 JGEOTEXTILE
FILTER
SY 1
295 1
$ 5.34 1,575.30
7.00
2,065.00
BLANKET, 7 OZ., NONWOVEN
SUBTOTAL PUMP STATION McGOWIN (
1 32,700.501
(
51 721.80
QUAIL
CREEK DAM - FAI-0405-09
705
POLLUTION CONTROL
LS
1
5,650.00
3,000.00
708
MOBILIZATION AND
LS
1,,
x s
3,955.00
6,000.00
DEMOBILIZATION
723
EARTHFILL
CY TBM
80
$ 13.00
1,040.00
22.00
1,760.00
761
RIPRAP, CLASS 2
TON
325
$ 82.66
26,864.50
83.44
27,118.00
795
GEOTEXTILE FILTER
SY
415
$ 5.34
2,216.10
7.00
2,905.00
BLANKET, 7 OZ., NONWOVEN
SUBTOTAL QUAIL CREEK DAM
I
l 39,725.601
{ 40 783.00
HIGHWAY
31 GAS LINE - FAI-0405-13
702
SEEDING AND MULCHING
LS
1
;
1,775.00
2,000.00
708
MOBILIZATION AND
LS
1
"`
2,500.00=
! 4,000.00
DEMOBILIZATION
723
EARTHFILL
CY TBM
40
$ 13.00
520.00
22.00
880.00
761
RIPRAP, CLASS 2
TON
55
$ 82.66
4,546.301
83.44
4,589.20
795
GEOTEXTILE FILTER
SY
6.0
$ 5,34
320.40
7.00
420.00
BLANKET, 7 OZ., NONWOVEN
SUBTOTAL HIGHWAY 31 GAS LINE
1
( 9,661.701
1 11 889.20
IL;-4� +�. t•���i'a f .K � kl .!'_� irws'" �' } b 5�� tl' '�Y :: i ilrr
1) RAN �A+M ��.,U NET
235 988.50
_
$ 374 565.00
thiso bed-tfue and correct tabulation on the above named project.
HUTCHINSON, P.E.
Project Manager
Hutchinson, Moore & Rauch, LLC
FEBRUARY 16, 2006
Page 3of3
F2860\:
3793
09 March 2006
Councilmember Ford moved to accept the low bid of H.E. Newell, Inc:, Theodore,
Alabama to complete the following NRCS projects provided all specifications are met.
These NRCS projects will be funded by the General Operating Fund. Seconded by
Councilmember Christenberry, motion passed unanimously by voice vote.
NRCS
PROJECT NAME
LOW BID AMOUNT
FAI-0405-04
Sewer Plant
$61,060.00
FAI-0405-05
North Creek Drive/Fly Creek
$ 8,363.50
FAI-0405-07
613 Johnson Avenue
$32,411.90
FAI-0405-09
Quail Creek Dam
$39,725.60
Total
$141,561.00
I
BID SCHEDULE
Montrose Pressuer Sewer
Fairhope, Alabama
MEC Project Number 0986-043
i
ALL AIDS shall include sales tax and all other applicable tares and jees.
ALL BIDDERS must comply with the Contractor's Licensing Laws ofthe State ojAlabama (Code
1975; T'lle 34, Section 8, 1 - 27, cf. Seq), and must be certifiedjor the type work involved
NOTE. All items shall be Bid as Labor
'onl 11e City will supply all materials) CALVERT CONST. CO
FOLEY, AL 36535
i
UNIT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE a,t,rnrrN�
.6", SDR 11 I4DPE Pipe 2040 L.F,
d,00 �jd 00
4" SDR 1 I HDPE Pipe 6260 L.F.
,pp _ Q 9yD.eo
3) 3" SDR I I HOPE Pipe 400 L.P.
1 �h,IS`O g00. ov
4) 6"Valvewithbox 4Ea.'2oO.Od
5) 4" Valve with box 2Ea.
I-75—d.00
6) '2" Air Vacuum Valve assembly, complete 4 Ea.
_ ZD00.0 O 1�04.0 0
7) ', 6" Cleanout 3 Ea.
e _ 5S4 DD &J-Q u o
.I
8) 4" Cleanout ?Ea.
. e
hSD o �.S'"d, O (0
9) 3" Cleanout .1 Ea.
�SD.gqO"�D ,.lsO,dO
TOTAL BID (Items I - •9)
S O�00t to �� U O S I
i
I do hereby certify that the above is a true and
-, Fairhope, Alabama ah10:00'a.m. on Tuesday,
correct tabulation of bids received by the City of
February
14, 2006, at the Fairhope City Hall, the construction of the Montrose Pressure Sewer; MEC Project No. 0986-043. for
. M0ii0 N ERING CO, INC,
ACk W. Moore, PE & PLS
BOYINGTON PIPELINE
STOKCTON, AL 36579
UNIT
PRICE AMOUR
C.L.S. INC. W.R. MITCHELL CONTR.
MOBILE, AL 36606 EIGHT MILE, AL 36663
UNIT UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT I PRICE AMOUN
9,00 -V 4�0,,� I . -. .. 53.��'-,
cc 0 °c
00 eo
r' o
°" SaD,pO
°
000. as
oy i
�� Leo ao
r7s2
//Y .SSUFI2
asa �.yo3,�
�
��/•�.5.do
S,l>ybt7�
�o2lo.D �.
02���.Z •DO
3794
09 March 2006
Councilmember Stankoski moved to accept the low bid of Calvert Construction
Co., Foley, Alabama for the labor only on the Montrose Sewer Project, provided all
specifications are met. This project will be funded by the Water/Sewer Operating Fund.
Seconded by Councilmember Quinn, motion passed by unanimously by voice vote.
Councilmember Christenberry moved to address the following item not on the
printed agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Stankoski, motion passed unanimously by
voice vote.
Identification: "FIELDHOUSE-PLUMBING"
Bids to be received by: February 23, 2006
at: 4:00 p.m.
Field House Plumbing, to be located at Fairhope Municipal Stadium
Field House Plumbing is to be paid for out of
Acct. No:
by: (Nancy Wilson)
BID RECEIVED:
TOTAL BID AMOUNT.
DELIVERY:
PLUMBING MASTERS,
$24,846.00
Mobile, AL
As Needed
BATCHLERS
MECHANICAL
$86,000.00
As Required
CONTRACTORS
Mobile, AL
WAGNER PLUMBING
NO BID
It is recommended to accept the low bid of PLUMBING MASTERS, Mobile, AL.
All specifications have been met.
Eddie Boyett, ayne Smith,
Recreation Dept. Purchasing Agent
3795
09 March 2006
Councilmember Ford moved to accept the low bid of Plumbing Masters, Mobile,
Alabama for the Fieldhouse plumbing, provided that all specifications are met. This
project will be paid for by the Recreation Improvement account. Seconded by
Councilmember Quinn, motion passed unanimously by voice vote.
Councilmember Christenberry moved to pay bills as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously voice vote.
There being no further business to come for the City Counc' the meeting was
duly adjourned at 7:49 p.m.
Robert C. Gentle, Council President