HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-09-2004 Regular Meeting3370
STATE OF ALABAMA X
COUNTY OF BALDWIN X
The City Council, City of Fairhope, met in regular session at
5:30 p.m., Fairhope Municipal Complex Council Chamber,
161 North Section Street, Fairhope, Alabama 36532, on
Monday 9 August 2004.
Present were Mayor Timothy M. Kant, Councilmembers: Robert C. Gentle,
Michael A. Ford, Debbie W. Quinn, Pauline Anders, and Cecil Christenberry; City
Attorney Marion E. Wynne, and City Clerk/Treasurer Geniece W. Johnson. No one
was absent.
There being a quorum present, Mayor Kant called the meeting to order. The
Pledge of Allegiance was recited, and Nancy Wilson, Finance Director Assistant, gave
the invocation. Councilmember Quinn moved to approve minutes of the 26 July 2004,
regular meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Christenberry, motion passed
unanimously.
Councilmember Gentle moved for the final adoption of Ordinance No. 1223,
an ordinance amending the Tree Ordinance, Ordinance No. 1193. Seconded by
Councilmember Anders, motion passed by the following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford,
Quinn, Kant, Anders and Christenberry. NAY -none.
Councilmember Anders introduced in writing Ordinance No. 1224, an ordinance
to transfer 42.17 acres back to Fairhope Single Tax Colony for development as a public
park. In order to take immediate action Councilmember Gentle moved for immediate
consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Quinn, motion for immediate
consideration passed unanimously by the following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn,
Kant, Anders, and Christenberry. NAY -none. Councilmember Quinn then moved for
final adoption of Ordinance No. 1224. Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion for
final adoption passed unanimously by the following vote: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn,
Kant, Anders, and Christenberry. NAY -none.
Councilmember Gentle introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution, a resolution allowing for the revisiting of the Comprehensive Plan
of the City of Fairhope. Seconded by Councilmember Quinn, motion passed
unanimously.
3371
9 August 2004
Christopher D. Baker, AICP Director of Planning and Building, addressed the City
Council make the following report and requesting that the City Council approve a
resolution that deals with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. As you know the Plan
was adopted in January 2001. Since that time many things have taken place in the City
— The City has issued more than 780 new single-family permits, for example.
The strategies matrix in the rear of the Plan indicates that the City should reevaluate the
Plan every year. Since 2001 the City has not reevaluated the Plan.
It is time to revisit the Plan, not to throw it all out, but to see what aspects of it are
working well and what may need to be revised to be more applicable. Additionally, the
City has implemented more than 35% of the work tasks in the plan, it would also be
prudent to reevaluate what the City needs to work on to make the plan a reality.
There are also new ideas and initiatives that should be debated, such as economic
development and an economic strategy for downtown. These are elements that could
further buttress the long-term viability of downtown.
The process should be public, transparent, and engage the citizens of Fairhope. It
should follow the same process we utilized in 2000.
The Planning Commission approved the Resolution at the August meeting.
9 August 2004
RESOLUTION NO. 1048
3372
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope Planning Commission approved the Comprehensive
Plan on 21 December 2000, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan on
29 January 2001; and,
WHEREAS, the Alabama Chapter of the American Planning Association recognized
the City of Fairhope in 2002 as having created the best plan in the State, and;
WHEREAS, Section 6.2 Strategies Matrix indicates that the Plan should be reevaluated
in the short term, every 2 years, and;
WHEREAS, more than 780 new single family residential permits have been issued
since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Planning Commission and the City Council
of the City of Fairhope, Alabama that:
1. The City of Fairhope Comprehensive Plan be reevaluated in light of the growth the
City is experiencing, and;
2. That the process be public, transparent, and actively engage the citizenry of
Fairhope, just as the original process did, and;
3. The Plan incorporate new topics to be considered, such as economic development,
downtown economic strategies, and others that will be identified by the Planning
Commission, the City Council, and the public.
The Planning Commission approved this resolution on the 2"a day of August 2004.
Adopted by the City of Fairhope City Council this 9`h day of August , 2004.
Timdthy M. gant, Mayor
J
Attest:
d lifi• ����►�
Geniece W. Johnso ity Clerk/ Treasurer
3373
9 August 2004
Councilmember Ford introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution, a resolution authorizing Mayor Kant to execute a supplemental
agreement to contract for professional services between Barge Waggoner Sumner &
Cannon, Inc. and the City of Fairhope for the H. L. "Sonny" Callahan Airport project.
Seconded by Councilmember Anders, motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO.1048
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual benefit, the City of Fairhope and Barge
Waggoner Sumner & Cannon, Inc., hereto agree as follows:
The Engineer shall furnish and perform basic engineering services for the project development phase,
design phase, bid phase and construction phase, as described in the General Provisions attached hereto
and have a part hereof for the engineering project described below, plus other work which might be
authorized by the City of Fairhope.
A. BASIC SERVICES
1. Project Development and Design Phase Services for the following items of work:
Relocation of Runway 0 1/ 19 — base bid
Paving Marking to New Runway 0 1/ 19
Five New Taxiway Connectors
New Partial Parallel Taxiway
Lighting and Electrical Vault
Apron Reconstruction
Parallel Taxiway Overlay
Bid and Construction Phase Services will be provided under the contract between the City of Fairhope
and BWSC executed on October 27, 2001
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, that Mayor
Timothy M. Kant is hereby authorized to execute a supplemental agreement to contract for professional
services between Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon, Inc. and City of Fairhope for the H. L. "Sonny"
Callahan Airport project.
Passed, Adopted, and Approved this 9`h Day of August , 2004.
fin•
aTimhy M. ant, ayor
Attest:
W
eniece W. Johnson, City Y,er reasurer
3374
9 August 2004
Councilmember Anders introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution authorizing Mayor Kant to execute the Fiscal Year 2004-Federal
and State Grant Applications for Airport Improvement Project (AIP) 3-01-0029-006-
2004 H. L. "Sonny" Callahan Airport. This will be for the City of Fairhope's FY 2004-
2005. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle, motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 1050
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City of Fairhope as follows:
1. That the City of Fairhope is authorized to make an application on the amount of one hundred five thousand, five
hundred twelve dollars ($105,512) for airport improvement funding assistance from the State of Alabama
Department of Transportation, for the purpose of undertaking a project to make improvements at the H. L. "Sonny"
Callahan Airport.
2. That the application be submitted for and on behalf of the City of Fairhope by its Mayor who is authorized by this
resolution to sign the application and any related forms or documents on behalf of the City of Fairhope
3. That the City of Fairhope is authorized to enter into an airport improvement funding agreement with the State of
Alabama, acting by and through the Alabama Department of Transportation, for the purpose of undertaking a
project to make improvements at the H. L. "Sonny" Callahan Airport, with partial funding provided by the State of
Alabama.
4. That the agreement be executed in the name of the City of Fairhope for and on behalf of the City of Fairhope by its
Mayor.
5. That the agreement be attested by the Operations Manager and the seal of the City of Fairhope affixed thereto.
6. That the authority of the City of Fairhope to enter into contracts with the State of Alabama has been reviewed by
the City of Fairhope's attorney, and in his/her opinion, the City of Fairhope is duly authorized to commit the City
of Fairhope to an agreement with the Alabama Department of Transportation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Fairhope hereby affirms that the local matching share of
funds in the amount of one hundred five thousand, five hundred eleven dollars (S105,511) required for
this agreement has been officially approved, placed into the budget of the airport and is available for
expenditure upon execution of the State of Alabama's funding agreement and the start of the project.
I, the undersigned qualified and acting as the Mayor of Fairhope, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true copy of a resolution lawfully passed and adopted by the City of Fairhope named
therein, at a regular meeting of such body held on the 91h day of Au ug st , 2004, and that such
resolution is on file in the office of the City of Fairhope.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of
Fairhope on this 10`h day of August 2004.
Adopted This 91h Day of August 2004.
s J
thy M. a , Mayor
Attest: Ti
Geniece W. Johnson, City erk/Treasurer
3375
9 August 2004
Christopher D. Baker, AICP Director of Planning and Building, addressed the City
to explain Mrs. Betty Rejczyk's request for a Site Plan approval for a Bed and Breakfast
at 202 South Mobile Street, Fairhope, Alabama (Generally located at the old Forsman
Home Site at Fels and South Mobile Street).
Mrs. Rejczyk is seeking to construct a bed and breakfast at the foot of Fels. This is the
property that was recently rezoned from R2 to B3A, which allows for a B&B.
The issues associated with this case are as follows:
Building Height: The Planning Commission approved the height at 29' 10" which is
below the 30' maximum.
Parking: Off street parking is being provided. It will be shielded from the street by the
landscaping. You may recall that much of the discussion when the property was
rezoned centered around "lets not have a parking lot on S. Mobile St."
Landscaping: The plans have been reviewed and approved by the City Horticulturist.
Plans: Attached are elevations, landscaping, and a site plan of the project that the
Planning Commission approved.
All other requirements have been met or agreed to. The Planning Commission
unanimously approved the request
Mr. Baker recommends approval of this request.
Councilmember Gentle moved to approve the Site Plan for Mrs. Rejczyk. Seconded by
Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously.
City Council reviewed an application for a Beer/Wine On/Off-Premises License
by Randolph K. Williams, dba Red or White Wine, located at 110 South Section Street,
Fairhope, Alabama. Councilmember Anders moved to approve the issuance of the
license. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle, motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Christenberry moved to grant the request of Baldwin County
Home Builders Association requesting permission to put up directional signs for their
annual Parade of Homes scheduled for September 11, 12, 18, and 19, 2004. as long as
the signs are picked up at the end of each weekend tour. Seconded by Councilmember
Quinn, motion passed unanimously.
3376
9 August 2004
Mrs. Shirley M. Jones, President of Kensington Homeowners Association, Inc.
addressed the City Council in opposition to the proposed Willie T's Chicken
Restaurant, located on Lottie Lane, Fairhope, Alabama. Mrs. Jones and the residents of
Kensington Court and residents in the surrounding area have the following objections to
the Willie T's Chicken Restaurant Plan:
Traffic - The flow of Fairhope Avenue traffic will be impeded as traffic enters Lottie
Lane, especially as cars enter from the westbound lane. Traffic exiting the
establishment using the proposed exit driveway into Fairhope Avenue would further
impede the flow of traffic on the already overtaxed street. There is already an excess of
driveways entering Fairhope Avenue in the vicinity. Our neighborhood's only
entrances are into Fairhope Avenue and entering that street is already a problem.
Noise — Plans call for a drive -up window located on the east side of the building. The
electronic speaker systems normally serving drive -up windows are usually noisy. Some
Kensington residents tell me they can hear every word spoken over the drive -up
speakers of the bank located across the street from the proposed restaurant. The
proposal would add a closer speaker causing noise at even later hours, as we understand
the restaurant plans to operate until 9:00 p.m. nightly.
Securi — Considering the late hours of operation, our residents fear that among the
additional people attracted to the neighborhood there will be those with criminal intent.
Currently, our residents fell safe walking their dogs on the street in front of their homes
and in the alley behind their houses. This alley is very close to the fence separating our
property from the proposed restaurant.
Sanitation — Plans submitted indicate that a garbage bin would be placed very near our
property. Some of our residents have lived near retail food outlets and have
experienced unpleasant odors, rodents, roaches and even snakes because of the garbage
storage. Could we be assured that the garbage would be hauled away on a nightly
basis?
Air Pollution — The kitchen exhaust, located on the roof, would be placed on the back
third of the building, on the east side near our neighborhood property line. How could
we not be breathing smoke and cooking odors during the long hours of daily operation?
Exterior Lighting — Could we be assured that lighting is focused downward with no
beams cast horizontally and upward? Would we be exposed to garish lighted
signboards?
3377
9 August 2004
We have been reminded that Gaddy's Restaurant set a precedent for a restaurant when it
operated at the other end of Lottie Lane. The back of Gaddy's restaurant was more than
one hundred fifty (150) feet from our property. This was a small dine in restaurant
opened for lunch only. There was no drive -up window.
And speaking of precedents, let's look at Wendy's Restaurant on Greeno Road.
Wendy's property abuts residential property. Wendy's has a drive -up window.
Wendy's building is approximately seventy-five (75) feet from its back property line. It
would be impossible to place the proposed chicken restaurant that far from our property
line.
Fairhope zoning ordinance, page 456, section 5.423, Uses Prohibited, indicates that
consideration maybe given to findings of quote "Potentially noxious, dangerous or
offensive to adjacent properties by reason of odor, smoke, noise, glare, fumes, gas
vibration or likely of other reasons to be incompatible with the character of the district
or adjacent districts."
We understand that B-2 zoning allows from businesses. We think there are businesses
with which we could co -exist. Compatible businesses may include florists, clothing
stores, sporting goods stores, barbershops, beauty shops, or similar clean businesses. A
fast food restaurant would be detrimental not only to our neighborhood but to everyone
using the nearby portion of Fairhope Avenue. We have heard of people changing banks
because of traffic congestion in the Lottie Lane, Fairhope Avenue vicinity. Aren't there
other commercial properties available which are more accessible along Greeno Road
where a fast food restaurant would be more likely to succeed?
When considering this business in this location, please think about the effect is will
have on our neighborhood and all who travel in the area.
Mayor Kant thanked Mrs. Jones for their concerns and expressed that these concerns
will be passed on to the Planning and Zoning Commission, for this item will be
addressed by the P&Z on September 7, 2004.
H. L. "Sonny" Callahan Airport
Fairhope, Alabama
AIP 3-01-0029-006-2004
Bid Opening
July 29, 2004
Bid Tabulations on next page
3378
9 August 2004
Contractor
Mobile Asphalt Co.
Theodore, Al
Hosea O. Weaver
Sons, In.
Mobile, Al
John G. Walton
Construction Co.,
Inc., Mobile, Al
Esfeller
Construction Co.,
Inc. Irvington, Al
Base Bid
$2,962,452.00
$3,431,306.99
$3,584,034.84
$3,288,487.37
Additive Alternate 1
$428,945.00
$403,582.25
$455,562.45
$453,093.57
Additive Alternate 2
$233,215.00
$228,496.10
$255,183.50
$281,543.38
Additive Alternate 3
$55,000.00
$53,649.80
$53,424.00
$58,814.40
Alternate Bid Item
$187,590.00
$181,330.95
$180,568.87
$198,786.97
Base Bid + Alternates 1
$3,391,397.00
$3,834,889.24
$4,039,597.29
$3,741,580.94
Base Bid + Alternates 1 & 2
$3,582,212.00
$4,017,275.34
$4,254,500.79
$3,948,394.32
Base Bid + Alternates 1, 2, & 3
$3,637,212.00
$4,070,925.14
$4,307,924.79
$4,007,208.72
Base Bid + Alternates 1,2, & 3
$3,695,812.00
$4,117,262.45
$4,362,140.57
$4,067,995.62
Alternate Bid Item
DBE Goal 11.95% 12.010.% 12.895% 12.895% 100.000%
Base bid is for paving, lighting & marking of runway, parallel and connector taxiways
Additive Alternate 1 is for apron reconstruction in the hanger area
Additive Alternate 2 is for parallel taxi overlay
Additive Alternate 3 is for the standby power system
Alternate Bid Item is for LED taxiway lights and replaces a portion of the base bid if grant funds are
received for it. This is why you cannot simply add the bid and alternates to get a total
This is a five part bid - It is the recommendation of the Airport Board to accept the low bid of Mobile
Asphalt. The acceptance of this bid is contingent on the approval of funding by the FAA.
Councilmember Gentle moved to accept the low bid of Mobile Asphalt,
Theodore, Alabama, for the Airport Project (3-01-0029-006-2004), provided all
specifications are met and contingent on the approval of funds from the FAA.
Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously.
3379
9 August 2004
Mayor Kant recognized Boy Scout Dorriety with Troop 47. Mr. Dorriety is
working on his Communication Badge.
Councilmember Quinn moved to pay bills as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the City Council the meeting
was duly adjourned at 6:11 p.m.
TifiloKy M. Khnt, May r
I
c�%j2l�Cv eniece W. Johnson�, ICI