HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-09-2002 Regular Meeting2949
STATE OF ALABAMA X
COUNTY OF BALDWIN X
The City Council, City of Fairhope, met in regular session at
5:30 p.m., Fairhope Municipal Complex Council Chamber,
161 North Section Street, Fairhope, Alabama 36532, on
Monday, 9 September 2002.
Present were Mayor Timothy M. Kant, Councilmembers: Robert C. Gentle,
Michael A. Ford, Debbie W. Quinn, Pauline Anders, and Cecil Christenberry; City
Attorney Marion E. Wynne, and City Clerk Geniece W. Johnson. No one was absent.
There being a quorum present, Mayor Kant called the meeting to order. The
Pledge of Allegiance was recited, and Father Gordon Milsted, Pastor of St. Lawrence
Catholic Church gave the invocation. Councilmember Quinn moved to approve minutes
of the 26 August 2002, regular meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle, motion
passed unanimously.
Councilmember Gentle introduced in writing Ordinance No. 1153. An Ordinance
for Bond Issue, General Obligation Warrants, 2002. In order to take immediate action,
Councilmember Anders moved for immediate consideration. Seconded by
Councilmember Ford, motion for immediate consideration passed unanimously by the
following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn, Kant, Anders, and Christenberry. NAY -
none. Councilmember Gentle then moved for final adoption of Ordinance No. 1153.
Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion for final adoption passed unanimously by the
following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn, Kant, Anders and, Christenberry. NAY -
none.
Councilmember Ford introduced in writing Ordinance No. 1154. An Ordinance
for Bond Issue, Utilities Revenue Warrants, Series 2002. In order to take immediate
action, Councilmember Anders moved for immediate consideration. Seconded by
Councilmember Quinn, motion for immediate consideration passed unanimously by the
following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn, Kant, Anders, and Christenberry. NAY -
none. Councilmember Ford then moved for final adoption of Ordinance No. 1154.
Seconded by Councilmember Gentle, motion for final adoption passed unanimously by
the following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn, Kant, Anders, and Christenberry. NAY -
none.
Councilmember Gentle introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Christenberry, motion passed
unanimously.
09 September 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 408-02
2950
A RESOLUTION COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
8.2 (B) OF THE TRUST INDENTURE BETWEEN THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE,
ALABAMA, AND REGIONS BANK DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 1996
BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council (herein together called the
"Council") of the City of Fairhope (herein called the "City"), in the State of Alabama, as
follows:
In order to comply with the requirements of Section 8.2 (b) of that certain Trust Indenture
between the City and Regions Bank, dated as of November 1, 1996 (herein called the
"1996 Indenture"), so that $6,720,000 aggregate principle amount of Utilities Revenue
Warrants, Series 2002, dated September 1, 2002 (herein called the "Series 2002
Warrants") of the City may be issued as additional securities under the provisions of the
1996 Indenture, the Council does hereby adopt this resolution, request that Regions Bank,
as trustee, authenticate and deliver the Series 2002 Warrants to the purchasers thereof,
and make the following recitals preliminary to the issuance of the Series 2002 Warrants:
(1) The City is not at this time in default under the 1996 Indenture and no such
default is imminent;
(2) The persons to whom the Series 2002 Warrants have been sold and shall be
delivered are The Frazer Lanier Company Incorporated and Merchant Capital
LLC;
(3) The Series 2002 Warrants are to be issued by sale and none thereof is to be issued
by exchange;
(4) The sale price of the Series 2002 Warrants is $6,608,504.70 (which reflects an
original issue discount of $61,095.30 and an underwriting discount of $50,400)
plus accrued interest on the Series 2002 Warrants from their date until the date of
delivery thereof and payment therefore;
2951
09 September 2002
(5) No securities have previously been issued by the City under the 1996 Indenture or
under any indenture supplemental thereto other than $4,195,000 aggregate
principal amount of Utilities Revenue Warrants, Series 1996, dated November 1,
1996, which were issued under the 1996 Indenture and which are now outstanding
in the aggregate principal amount of $2,830,000; $7,735,000 aggregate principal
amount of Utilities Revenue Warrants, Series 1997, dated March 1, 1997, which
were issued under the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 1, 1997,
and all of which are now outstanding and $1,905,000 aggregate principal amount
of Utilities Revenue Warrants, Series 1999, dated June 1, 1999, which were
issued under the Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 1999, and
which are now outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $1,780,000; and
(6) The Series 2002 Warrants are to be issued for the purpose of (a) paying the costs
of acquiring and constructing water and sanitary sewer line extensions, a water
tank, three water wells, and booster pump and such other improvements as the
Council may determine to be necessary and desirable, (b) providing for the debt
service reserve fund under the 1996 Indenture, and (c) paying the costs related to
the issuance of the Series 2002 Warrants, including the premium for municipal
bond insurance.
Adopted this 9th day of September 2002.
t �
4Tithy=M�Kz t, M or
Attest:
Geniece W. Johnson, Ci
2952
09 September 2002
Councilmember Quinn introduced in writing Ordinance No. 1155. An Ordinance
ratifying Resolution No. 763-01, and amending Ordinance No. 1128 — Environmental
Advisory Board. In order to take immediate action, Councilmember Anders moved for
immediate consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle, motion for immediate
consideration passed unanimously by the following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn,
Kant, Anders, and Christenberry. NAY -none. Councilmember Gentle then moved for
final adoption of Ordinance No. 1155. Seconded by Councilmember Quinn, motion for
final adoption passed unanimously by the following votes: AYE -Gentle, Ford, Quinn,
Kant, Anders and Christenberry. NAY -none.
Councilmember Ford moved to address item # 9 at this time. Seconded by
Councilmember Gentle, motion passed unanimously.
Daniel G. Blackburn with Blackburn & Conner, P.C. Law Office, addressed the
City Council requesting the City Council to review the Fairhope Planning Commission's
denial of an application submitted by Baldwin County Sewer Service for approval to
extend its lines within the extraterritorial planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope. (ss
11-52-11 Code of Alabama).
Mr. Blackburn requested that the City Council, along with the Planning Commission,
meet with him and his clients, Baldwin County Sewer Service, in a work session to
discuss this issue and reach an agreement.
Christopher Baker, Director of Planning and Building, explained to the City Council that
the request to approve Baldwin County Sewer Service to provide sewer service in the
Planning Jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope under Section 11-52-11 of State Code, came
before the Planning Commission on July 1, 2002. The Planning Commission denied the
request and passed a resolution.
The request was denied based on the following:
A. The application is incomplete:
1. The applicant did not meet all of the requirements of providing map
information, slopes, inverts, materials, pump sizes, alarm systems etc.
(requested in item 1 of 31 May letter)
2. The applicant did not indicate all future sewer service expansion plans and
areas of proposed service (requested in item 2 of 31 May letter).
2953
09 September 2002
The applicant did not provide financial information requested in item 4
and 6 of the 31 May letter. This information is critical to determining
whether the proposed public utility is fiscally viable in the long-term.
Without determining whether that is the case, the Planning Commission
cannot reasonably assess the likelihood that the proposed utility will be
able to serve future customers and to maintain, test, and monitor
constructed facilities.
4. The applicant did not provide information regarding its response to
documented ADEM environmental violation, as requested in item 5 of the
31 May letter.
5. The applicant did not provide financial information as requested in item 7
of the 31 May letter.
B. Existing sewer facilities appear to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Current pattern of sewer provision is disconnected and irrational and
will encourage leapfrog, of sprawl, type development patterns, which are
specifically rejected in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The current pattern of sewer provision appears inconsistent with the
growth patterns currently predominating the City and the extraterritorial
planning areas.
3. The current pattern of the sewer provision appears inconsistent with the
"village" concept overwhelmingly favored by the community as
specifically articulated in the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The sewer system proposed by the applicant is inherently inconsistent with
the character of Fairhope and the numerous goals and objectives listed in
the Comprehensive Plan, including:
a. This provision of infrastructure be made according to priority
growth areas and identified village centers.
b. That the timing, intensity, and density of growth be coordinated
with the availability of public facilities and services.
c. The public investment be discouraged beyond or outside of
planned growth areas.
Mr. Baker expressed that he still had not received the items requested.
2954
09 September 2002
Robert H. Freilich, with Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle Law Office, from Kansas City,
Missouri, and City Attorney Marion E. Wynne was present. Mr. Wynne stated that he
was not sure if it was appropriate to give legal advice in a public forum. The City of
Fairhope is currently in litigation with Elite Development LLC, pertaining to this issue.
After City Council questions and discussion, Councilmember Quinn moved to uphold
the staff s recommendation to deny the request. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle,
motion passed unanimously.
City Attorney, Marion E. Wynne exited the dais at 6:15 p.m.
Councilmember Ford introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Anders, motion passed unanimously.
After discussion, Councilmember Ford withdrew his motion authorizing Mayor Kant to
amend the 2001-2002 budget.
Councilmember Anders introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 409-02
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE,
BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA that Mayor Timothy M. Kant is hereby authorized
to amend the Working of Budget FY 2001-2002, as recommended by staff.
Adopted this 9th day of September , 2002
M. K nt, M yor
Councilmember Gentle introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Quinn, motion passed unanimously.
09 September 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 410-02
2955
WHEREAS, there was filed in the Probate Records of Baldwin County, Alabama, in
Miscellaneous Book 1 at Pages 230, 231 and 287, a plat of Park City Subdivision which
dedicated certain streets and alleys for public use, and;
WHEREAS, Park City Subdivision was not then nor has it ever been within the corporation limits
or jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, Alabama, such as would give the City control of streets or
alleys therein, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope did, by virtue of having installed and maintained a natural gas
service pipeline within an area described in the attached Declaration of Vacation, acquired or
have an easement to operate and maintain a gas pipeline therein, and;
WHEREAS, the superintendent of the City of Fairhope Natural Gas Utility has informed the City
Council that the particular line is no longer in service and, therefore, the subject easement is not
being used nor is it required by the City, and;
WHEREAS, it is the determination of this Council that the City of Fairhope has no jurisdiction
over streets or alleys within Park City and, further, that the City has no public need for the
easement existing within the described area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAIRHOPE, that this Council hereby assents to the Declaration of Vacation filed by Rocco and
Bari Valluzzo and Kevin V. Spriggs Enterprises on 19 August 2002, insofar as it operates to
divert the public of any rights existing or which might have existed by virtue of a natural gas
pipeline within the area described.
ADOPTED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 2002.
c 'S.' Ti thy M. ant, tAayor
Attest:
Geniece W. Johnson, City
I, Geniece W. Johnson, duly appointed City Clerk - Treasurer of the City of Fairhope, Alabama, do hereby
certify that Resolution No. 410-02 is a true and accurate copy of Resolution No. 410-02 passed and
approved by the Governing Body of the City of Fairhope on September 9, 2002.
Geniece W. Johnson, City Clerk Date
2956
09 September 2002
Councilmember Anders introduced in writing, and moved for the adoption of the
following resolution. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle, motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 411-02
WHEREAS, the State proposes a project of certain highway improvements in Baldwin County,
Alabama, said project being designed as Project No. BRF 0101 (547) and consisting
approximately of the following: 2365 LIN. Ft. 2" P.V.C. Water Line and miscellaneous
appurtenances.
WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope Water Department is the owner of certain facilities located on
private or public right-of-way, as applicable, at places where they will interfere with the
construction of said project unless said facilities are relocated; and,
WHEREAS, the Transportation Director has determined that the relocation of the facilities
hereinafter referred to is necessitated by the construction of said project and has requested or
ordered, as applicable, the City of Fairhope Water Department to relocate same; and,
WHEREAS, under the laws of Alabama, the State is required to compensate the City of Fairhope
Water Department for all or part of such relocation;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follow and other particular listed within the
contract:
The City of Fairhope Water Department, not being staffed or equipped to perform the
relocation, requests that the relocation work be included in the State's Highway
Construction Contract. The relocation of the facilities will be accomplished in
accordance with and as shown by the City of Fairhope Water Department's
reproducible mylar plans, specifications, and estimate transmitted herewith and made
a part hereof by reference. The estimated cost of the "In -Kind" relocation including
engineering is $28,249.99.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA,
that Mayor Timothy M. Kant, is hereby authorized to execute a reimbursable Agreement between
the City of Fairhope and State of Alabama Department of Transportation for the relocation of
utility facilities located on Highway 98 (Fish River Bridge Project).
Adopted this 091h Day of September , 2002
C � �
Ti thy M. ant, yor
Attest:
IOWA
Geniece W. `►
2957
09 September 2002
Harry Phillips, Environmental Advisory Board Chairperson, addressed the City
Council advising the City Council of the potential adverse environmental impacts the
extension of County Road 13, as currently proposed by the Baldwin County Commission,
will likely have upon the citizens of Fairhope — particularly those residing in or near the
Fly Creek and Cowpen Creek watersheds.
Mr. Phillips presented the following report:
Mr. Mayor, members of the City Council and fellow citizens. In pursuit of its mission to
advise and inform this Council and the public on environmental issues, the Board has
investigated the proposed County Road 13 Extension Project in an attempt to weigh the
benefits against the probable impact on our environment.
We have met with county commissioners, county highway officials and engineers, county
environmental officers, Auburn Experimental Station officials, and numerous citizens
who reside in or near the path of the proposed extension. We have also spoken to city
officials and Baldwin County Education Board officials.
We have heard rumors that the County Road 13 extension was selected as an alternative
to the widening of County Road 27 due in part to the high cost of relocating public
utilities. We have also been led to believe that the State of Alabama has plans to trade
another state highway in exchange for County Road 27 at which time they will proceed
with plans to 4-lane 27.
We have learned that some $3,000,000 in state and federal money has been appropriated
for the extension from County Road 64 in Daphne to Highway 104 in Fairhope, and from
County Road 44 to County Road 32 in Fairhope. In addition, an interchange at I-10 has
been approved. Thus, when complete, County Road 13 will extend from Interstate 10
South, all the way to U.S. 98 west of Magnolia Springs.
We have been told that the extension will be a 2-lane road needed to accommodate local
traffic, such as transportation to the schools on or near the route. In fact, the extension is
designed for speeds of 55 mph with few turns, no traffic lights and with 100-ft, or more,
right -a -ways — 40 feet wider than is required for 2- lane county roads.
It is a known fact that, regardless of the best laid plans, new roads lead to increased
vehicular traffic and new development — both of which can be detrimental to our
environment.
We were told that the county highway officials met with the previous city administration
five or six years ago and did not hear any objections to a long-range plan to extend
County Road 13. A lot can happen in five years!
09 September 2002 2958
Five years ago, how many in this room had any idea that the City of Fairhope would
record the highest ozone pollution levels in all of Mobile and Baldwin Counties. Were it
not for a sudden shift in weather patterns this past summer, we could very likely be
declared non -attainment. Ozone is formed when high levels of nitrous oxide and VOC's
are exposed to sunlight and warm temperatures. Nitrous oxides are emitted from coal
burning power plants and internal combustion engines. Until such time that these
emissions are reduced through better technologies and more stringent regulations,
increased vehicular traffic within the City of Fairhope and its surroundings will increase
the probability of being declared non -attainment for air pollution.
Five years ago, how many in this room had any idea that in the year 2001, the City of
Fairhope would issue 281 new single family permits — a record in spite of the fact that we
have adopted a Comprehensive Plan, which is intended to control growth so that "what
makes Fairhope, Fairhope will not be destroyed". The proposed County Road 13
extension is likely to be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and has all the markings
of accelerating SPRAWL.
Furthermore, new road construction and residential and commercial development will, by
definition, reduce our "green -space" by increasing "hard -surface" areas and result in
increased storm water run off into and through the Fly Creek and Cowpen Creek
watersheds.
Peter Weise, of our Board, reported last year on these two watersheds. He questioned
whether, in connection with development already in place, sufficient attention was being
paid to the impact an individual development has on the entire watershed and observed
"It would appear that development in the Cowpen Creek watershed has reached the point
where the societal benefits of more development will be offset by the negative factors."
He went on to state " The greatest threat to the environment in the Fly Creek watershed is
yet to come. If property managed, this section of Fairhope can be an asset to the City and
an example for the rest of the county and the state. If not properly managed the residents
of Fairhope can look forward to flooding and concrete flumes as the order of the day and
downstream residential and harbor activities adversely affected".
As a result of our investigation, it is this Board's recommendation that the City Council
move to deter and defer the proposed extensions to County Road 13 until such time that
studies show that it will be compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and in the
best interests of the majority of our citizens. It is our opinion that our citizens have the
most to lose and the least to gain from this proposed project. Some of those present here
tonight may have other concerns that they would like to present to you.
09 September 2002 2959
After discussion, Councilmember Gentle moved to pass a resolution stating that the
Fairhope City Council disapprove of the proposal for County Road 13 in its present form.
Seconded by Councilmember Christenberry. The motion passed by the following votes:
AYE -Gentle, Ford, Kant, Anders and Christenberry. NAY — none, Abstain- Quinn.
Several residents that reside on Highway 13 were present.
City Council reviewed an application for a Special Retail License (One time
event) by Brian "Scot" Sanders, dba 911 Memorial Freedom Rally, located at Oak hollow
Farm, Inc. 14210 Greeno Road, Fairhope, Alabama. Councilmember Anders
moved to approve the issuance of the license. Seconded by Councilmember Gentle,
motion passed unanimously.
City Council reviewed an application for a Special Retail License (One time
event) by James A. Ketchum, dba Andree's Wine Cheese & Things, Inc., located at 403
Fairhope Avenue, Fairhope, Alabama. Councilmember Ford moved to approve the
issuance of the license. Seconded by Councilmember Anders, motion passed
unanimously.
City Council reviewed an application for a Restaurant Liquor License by John E.
Crimmins, dba Jalapenos at Battles Wharf, located at 19344 Scenic Highway 98,
Fairhope, Alabama. Councilmember Anders moved to approve the issuance of the
license. Seconded by Councilmember Quinn, motion passed unanimously.
Bid — Airport Fencing and Clearing
on the next page
O
tz
CA
CV IMPROVEMENTS TO H. L'SONNY' CALLAHAN AIRPORT
FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA
FAA AIP PROJECT NO. 3-01-0029-004-2002
BID TABULATION
Engineer's Opinion
of Probable Cost
Consolklated Fence Co.
25451 Cty Rd 27
Daphne. AL 36526
ouble D Consauction Co. Inc
P.O. Box 359
Lucedale. MS 39452
Goldman Contractors
1205 County Road 37
Pennlnaton. AL 36916
J.S. Walton 8 Co. Inc
P.O. Box 863
Mobile. AL 36601
John G. Wahon Constr Co. Inc
P.O. Box 81222
Mobile. AL 36689
M.C. Williams Cony. Inc
P.O. Box 82230
Mobile. AL 36689
S. J. 8 L Inc
P.O. Box 190034
Mobile. AL 36619
AL Uc i 22278
AL Uc N 18037
AL Uc M 27228
AL Uc 131
AL Uc 11 20293
AL Uc # 7186
AL Uc M 12522
23.8%
DBE
18%
DBE
0% DBE
19.97% DBE
12.42% DBE
17%
DBE
0%
DBE
$2500.00
5100.000.00
52,000.00
$80,000.00
$1,075.00
543.000.00
$1,025.00
541,000.00
'P-151-0.1
Site Preparation Cleari aril Grubbing
40
ACRE
51,308.27
552.330.80
$2.705.57
$108,222.80
53.000.00
$120,000.00
53,350.00
$134,000.00
=-156-5.1
Erosion Control
1
LS.
$10,000.00
S10,000.00
$25,000.00
$25.000.00
$23,300.00
523.300.00
$11,800.00
511.800.00
$25437.47
$25,437.47
$21,367.91
521367.91
$28,000.00 1
$28.000.00
$25,250.00
$25,250.00
A-600
Mobilization
1 I
LS.
$18.000.00
1 518.000.00
$1,000.00
$1.000.00
S10-ODO.00
510.000.00
54.875.00
54,875.00
S1O,T70.83
510,770.83
$18.869.96
S18,869.96
$10000.00
$10.000.00
$11,750.00
$11.750.00
=-161-5.1
6' Wildlite/Securav Fence
9.332
LF.
$8A0
574,656.00
$4.40
S41 060.80
55.16
546.153.12
57.07
$65,977.24
$5.36
550,019.52
$5.51
551,419.32
55.97
555,712.04
55.50
$51,326.00
=-162.5.1
6' Chain Link Fence
9.862
LF.
$11.00
$108,482.00
$7.75
$76.430.50
$10.18
Si00.395.16
S12.15
5119,823.30
59.91
597,732.42
S10.13
599.902.06
59.69
$95.562.78
58.90
587,771.80
-t62-52
24'Wide Gate Double -6'Hi h
2
EACH
$2000.00
54,000.00
5775.00
51.550.00
5900.00
51.800.00
5630.00
$1.250.00
5717.93
51,435.86
$734.58
51,469.16
$440.00
5880.00
$405.00
$8t0.00
12' Wide Gate - 6' Hi h
2
EACH
$1 000.00
$2,000.00
5550.00
$1,100.00
5650.00
51,300.00
5297.50
5595.00
S358497
5717.94
5367.29
$734.58
$330.00
5660.00
$305.00
$610.00
4'Wide Pedestrian Gate - 6'H h
1
EACH
$500.00
5500.00
5350.00
5350.00
5450.00
5450.00
$280.00
$280.00
SST02
$87.02
589.04
589.04
$198.73
$198.73
$185.005185.WCreek
Crossinas
10
EACH
$1.000.00
$10.000.00
$250.00
52.500.00
5450.00
54.500.00
5498.50
54,985.00$163.17
$1,631.70
$16695
$1,669.50
$44.00
$440.00
540.50
5405.00
J�-162-5.4
Seedi
40
ACRE
$600.00
$24.000.00
5500.00
$20,000.00
5515.00
520.600.00
$324.00
512.960.005535.19
$21407.60
$62868
521,147.20
5800.00
532,000.00
$625.00$25.000.00
Mulching40
ACRE
$1,800.00
$72,000.00
$500.00
$20,000.00
5550.00
522.000.00
$170.00
56,800.00
5489.50
$19,SB0.00
$528.68
521,147.20
$800.00
$32.000.00
$650.00
$26,000.00
Additional Insurance Coverage as Required
1
L.S.
51,500.00
$1,500.00
53,500.00
53,500.00
55,000.00
55.000.00
$350.00
5350.00
5100.00
5700.00
$117.14
5117.14
$500.00
1 5500.00
1 $3.000.00
53,000.00
ov Section 130 tFAA Non -Eligible)
BID TOTAL (NUMBERS) 5425,138.00 5272.491.30 $280.498.28 $270.705.54 $281,251.16 $346,155.87 $375.953.55 5366,107.80
I nereby certify that, to the best of my krKrMedge, this is a true and correct copy of the bid tabulation of bids which were opened at the City of Fairhope on August 20, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. local time for the captioned project
Items In bold Italics indicate corrected mathematkal extensions.
ii ahl u � ^
NatA W. Hobbs, P.E.
Alat8a Registration No. 22758
N
W
m
F-
G.
W
N
O
2964
09 September 2002
Councilmember Gentle moved to pay bills as presented. Seconded by
Councilmember Ford, motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Kant announced that a September 11 Memorial Service will be held at the
Fairhope Police Department at 8:30 a.m., on Wednesday, September 11, 2002.
There being no further business to come before the City Council the meeting was
duly adjourned at 6:52 p.m.
F
Ti y M. ant, Vayor
AIW
Geniece W. Johnson, ty Clerk
2961
09 September 2002
Councilmember Ford stated that the low bidder did not meet bid specifications in
that Goldman Construction did not bid the requisite DBE percentage and Goldman
Construction's Alabama Contractor's License is limited to $250,000.00, a figure less then
Goldman Construction's bid amount.
Councilmember Ford moved to accept the next low bid of Consolidated Fence Co,
Daphne, Alabama, provided all specifications are met. Seconded by Councilmember
Christenberry, motion passed unanimously.
Identification: TRANSFORMERS 75-150-300KVA
3 PHASE PADMOUNT
Bids to be received no later than: Aueust 2, 2002
at: 4:00 p.m.
Qty: 2 - 75 KVA Transformers, Three -Phase Pad Mount
VENDOR: BID AMOUNT TOTAL OPERATING DELIVERY.
FOR 2: COST FOR 2:
GRESCO/CAPSTONE (Option # 1)
Dothan, AL $5,970.00 $1,695.48 6-8 Weeks
Ermco
(Option #2)
$6,618.00 $1,852.68 8-10 Weeks
Cooper Power
UTILITY POWER, INC. $5,990.00 $1,864.72 42-56 Days
Fairhope, AL Howard Ind.
STUART C. IRBY CO. $6,818.00
ABB
$1,647.26 8-10 Weeks
(option
Pensacola, FL $6,636.00 $1,852.68 8-10 Weeks
Cooper Power
(Option #2)
$6,712.00 $1,968.00 6-Weeks
Central Malony
MAYER ELECTRIC (Option #1)
Dothan, AL $7,798.00 $1,615.80 4-5 Weeks
GE
(Option #2)
$8,308.00 $1,310.08 4-5 Weeks
GE
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC $9,018.00 $2,183.60 45-Days
Van -Trans
BRASFIELD SALES NO BID
Birmingham, AL
It is advised to accept the bid from MAYER ELECTRIC for the Actual Cost of $8,308.00 with the Evaluated Operating Cost of
$1,310.08. All specifications have been met.
2962
09 September 2002
Councilmember Gentle moved to accept the low bid of Mayer Electric, Dothan,
Alabama, provided all specifications are met. Seconded by Councilmember Ford, motion
passed unanimously.
Qty: 3 — 150 KVA Transformers, Three -Phase Pad Mount Distribution
VENDOR:
BID AMOUNT
TOTAL OPERATING
DELIVERY:
FOR 3:
COST FOR 3:
GRESCO/CAPSTONE
(Option #1)
Dothan, AL
$11,115.00
$4,107.12
6-8 Weeks
Ermco
(Option #2)
$11,544.00
$4,810.86
8-10 Weeks
Cooper
8-10 Weeks
Pensacola, FL
ABB
UTILITY POWER, INC.
$11,784.00
$4,387.29
45-56 Days
Fairhope, AL
Howard
MAYER ELECTRIC
(Option #1)
Dothan, AL
$14,823.00
$3,244.02
4-5 Weeks
GE
(Option #2)
$12,279.00
$4,842.36
4-5 Weeks
GE
HUGHES SUPPLY
(Option #1)
Pensacola, FL
$11,574.00
$4,810.86
8-10 Weeks
Cooper
(Option #2)
$11,730.00
$5,162.55
6-Weeks
Central Malony
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
$15,519.00
$5,343.30
45-Days
Mobile, AL
Van -Trans
BRASFIELD SALES
NO BID
Birmingham, AL
It is advised to accept the bid from MAYER ELECTRIC for the Actual Cost of $14,823.00 with the Evaluated Operating Cost of
3,244.02. All specifications have been met.
Councilmember Christenberry so moved to accept the low bid of Mayer Electric,
Dothan, Alabama, provided all specifications are met. Seconded by Councilmember
Quinn, motion passed unanimously.
2963
09 September 2002
Qty: 2 — 300 KVA Transformers, Three Phase Pad Mount Distribution
VENDOR: BID AMOUNT TOTAL OPERATING DELIVERY:
FOR 2: COST FOR 2:
GRESCOXAPSTONE
(Option #I)
Dothan, AL
$9,590.00
$5,114.32
6-8 Weeks
Ermco
(Option #2)
$10,120.00
$5,578.58
8-10 Weeks
Cooper
STUART C. IRBY CO.
$9,020.00
$5,855.70
8-10 Weeks
Pensacola, FI
ABB
MAYER ELECTRIC
(Option #1)
Dothan, AL
$10,244.00
$5,560.80
4-5 Weeks
GE
(Option #2)
$11,398.00
$4,957.90
4-5 Weeks
GE
HUGHES SUPPLY
(Option #l)
Pensacola, FL
$10,140.00
$5,578.58
8-10 Weeks
Cooper
(Option #2)
$10,280.00
$6,161.00
6-Weeks
Central Malony
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
$14,102.00
$6,477.00
45-Days
Van -Trans
•
ays
Fairhope, AL
BRASFIELD SALES
NO BID
Birmingham, AL
It is advised to accept the bid from Mayer Electric for the Actual Cost of 11,398.00 with the Evaluated Operating Cost of
$4,957.90. All specifications have been met.
Aaron Norris, Wayne Smith,
Electrical Superintendent Purchasing Agent
Councilmember Ford moved to accept the low bid of Mayer Electric, Dothan,
Alabama, provided all specifications are met. Seconded by Councilmember Quinn,
motion passed unanimously.