HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-17-2017 Board of Adjustments MinutesJuly 17, 2017
Board of Adjustment Minutes
1
The City of Fairhope Board of Adjustments and Appeals met on Monday, July 17,
2017 at 5:00 PM in the City Council Chambers at the City Administration Building,
located at 161 N. Section Street.
Members Present: Chairman Anil Vira; Troy Strunk, Vice-Chair; Dick Schneider;
John Avent; Cathy Slagle; Wayne Dyess, Director of Planning; Buford King,
Planner; and Emily Boyett, Secretary.
Absent: none
The meeting was called to order at 5:00 PM by Chairman Vira.
The minutes of the April 17, 2017 meeting were considered. Dick Schneider moved to
accept the minutes with corrections and was 2nd by Troy Strunk. Motion carried
unanimously.
BOA 17.07 Public hearing to consider the request of Fairhope United Methodist
Church for a Special Exception to allow a columbarium. The
property is located at 155 S. Section Street.
Mr. King gave the staff report.
Summary of Request:
The subject property is located at 155 S. Section Street, which is the location of the
Fairhope United Methodist Church. The subject property is zoned B-2 General Business
District and is also located in the Central Business District (CBD). The applicant is
requesting a Special Exception to allow the construction of a columbarium.
A columbarium is defined as “vault or other structure with recesses in the walls to receive
the ashes of the dead.” A columbarium’s usage is most closely identified with a
cemetery, which as defined in the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance as “land used or
intended to be used for the burial of the animal or human dead and dedicated for
cemetery purposes, including crematories, mausoleums, and mortuaries.” A Special
Exception is required in the B-2 zoning classification to authorize a cemetery as an
allowable use. Further, Table 3-1: Use Table indicates the use is allowed “only on appeal
and subject to special conditions”.
The applicant is proposing to construct the columbarium on the northwest side of the
subject property near the intersection of the Section Street and Morphy Avenue. The
columbarium will be shielded by the existing Wesley Hall to the north and surrounded by
a screening wall of varying height, but a minimum of approximately 6’-0” on all sides.
The wall structure consists of concrete blocks with face brick matching the existing
structures. Urn niches will be placed in the inner perimeter facing inward toward
additional landscaping. Provision for future “ground” niches is also indicated in the
applicant’s plans, and future niches will also be shielded by the afore-mentioned wall
structure and building. A detailed landscaping plan is not included in the applicant’s
drawings. However, landscaping features on the exterior columbarium walls are shown
July 17, 2017
Board of Adjustment Minutes
2
for schematic purposes on the architectural drawings and may indicate the applicant’s
desire to provide landscaping visible from Section Street.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Special Exception to allow a columbarium
on the subject property.
Clay Adams of WAV Architects – He stated he is also a member of the church and this
has been in the works for 5 years and part of the master plan for the campus for 20 years.
He explained the columbarium will be on the back side of a brick wall and not visible
from the street. He said it will match the existing brick and will be landscaped. He noted
it is not a scatter garden but sets of vaults set into the wall. He stated there will be
approximately 400 vaults.
Mr. Vira opened the public hearing. Having no one present to speak he closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Schneider stated there are already several columbariums in the City.
John Avent made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to approve the proposed
Special Exception to allow a columbarium on the subject property. Dick Schneider 2nd
the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
BOA 17.08 Public hearing to consider the request of Henry and Ann Davis for a
variance to the rear yard setback requirements for a principle
structure. The property is located at 612 N. Mobile Street.
Mr. King gave the staff report.
Summary of Request:
The subject property is located at 612 N. Mobile Street and is zoned R-2 Medium Density
Single Family Residential District. The applicant is requesting a 15’ variance to the 35’
rear yard setback requirement for a principal structure.
The subject property is located at 612 N. Mobile Street at the intersection of Mobile
Street and a portion of Pensacola Avenue that is an unopened right-of-way. Neighboring
lots to the subject property are generally uniform and rectangular, however the subject
property contains both a rectangular and a triangular lot. The triangular lot contains front
and rear lot lines converging at an approximately 45-degree angle. City of Fairhope
Zoning Ordinance Article IX, Section C defines a Lot Line, Rear as “The lot line opposite
to and most distant from the front lot line.” The triangular lot fronts upon Mobile Street,
and as a result the lot line opposite to and most distance from the front lot line is the
afore-mentioned lot line at approximately 45 degrees to the front lot line. Applying 35’
front and rear setbacks as well as a 10’ side setback results in an allowable building area,
subject to coverage requirements, of 722 sf. Due to the size and shape of the lot, the
request related to the triangular lot of the subject property is to reduce the rear setback to
20’, resulting in an allowable building area of 1,741sf (subject to coverage requirements).
The size and shape of the triangular lot are a physical hardship impairing the size of
July 17, 2017
Board of Adjustment Minutes
3
potential single-family construction on the triangular lot of the subject property. Staff
believes that a variance allowing a 20’ rear setback in lieu of a 35’ rear setback is
warranted under the criteria of the Zoning Ordinance.
Recommendation:
It is staff’s position that the variance request has proven hardship (shape and size) as
required by the criteria established by the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance Article
II.C.3.e. Therefore, staff recommends that variance request be approved.
Trae Corte was present to answer any questions.
Mr. Vira opened the public hearing.
Patty Cater of 611 Pensacola Avenue – She asked how this request will impact her and
she asked to see the master plan for the development. Mr. Strunk explained this is not a
development and is only to allow a single home to be constructed on the lot. Mr. King
stated the development she is referencing is Van Antwerp and this is not part of it.
Having no one else present to speak, Mr. Vira closed the public hearing.
Mrs. Slagle asked if the current owner owns both lots and Mr. Corte responded yes. He
explained they plan to demolish the existing home on the lot and build 2 new homes, one
on each lot.
Troy Strunk made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to approve the request
based on the application meeting the requirements of a hardship (shape and size). Cathy
Slagle 2nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
Having no further business, Cathy Slagle made a motion to adjourn. Troy Strunk 2nd the
motion and the motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 5:19 PM.