Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-09-1985 Regular MeetingThe Planning & Zoning COmmission met July 9, 1985 at 5:00 P.M. at the City Administration Building, 161 N. Section Street, Fairhope, Alabama Present: Chairman Roy White; members Robert Mason, James Nix, Mary Doug Foreman, Jack Kirk, Cecil Pitman, Dick Sanderson The minutes of the June 3, 1985 meeting were duly approved as written on motion by Jack Kirk, seconded by Mary Doug Foreman and unanimously carried. The Chairman commended John Parker for his long years of service on the Commission and the expertise he offered over the years, and announced that Dick Sanderson had been appointed as a new member. The Chairman also mentioned the untimely death of Commission member Harrell Holder who had served on the Commission since 1980, and was Secretary since 1981. At this time James Nix moved that a Resolution be sent to the Holder family offering our sympathy, a copy attached to the minutes. Robert Mason seconded and motion carried unanimously. Mr. White asked at this time if Robert Mason would serve as Secretary until October when officers elected, he said he would; and if Jack Kirk would serve as Vice -Chairman for the same period of time, he said he would The Commission considered at this time a subdivision application of Central Bank/FSTC for one lot into two the building located on property at Magnolia & Section Streets on the west side of the street. Mr. Irby and Mr. Odom were present to answer questions. Mr. Irby said he would be in one part and Ken Gibson would be in the other, they would share a common wall. A plat had been presented. Bob was asked for his comments he remark that everything was in order and he had recommended preliminary and final approval. Robert Mason moved for approval, Dick Sander son seconded and motion carried unanimously. Discussion was held on a proposed subdivision of Victor Altamarino, Valta S/D 14 lots located on Gayfer Ext. outside the City Limits. Mr. Altamarino addressed the Commission and stated he was getting input at this time, that he was planning on seeking annexation from the state and would like to have R-4 zoning for this property. Bob's comments were noted, he had remarked that these lots were R-2 size. He is proposing connection to the sanitary sewer at Meadow - brook subdivision. He had a drawing that showed a retention pond of .23 acres to control storm water run-off. Bob had also commented that consideration should be given relative to the capacity of the existing lift station and force main. James Nix moved that if plans okey that an application for zoning be considered at the August meeting. Jack Kirk seconded and motion carried unanimously. Curtis Gordon came forth representing Valley Creek development the land surrounding the proposed golf course. He presented drawing which showed color coded portions, explaining the different colors(single family, multi -family) one color for the water flowing through the property and also showed the proposed golf course layout and street layouts. The Chairman asked just what he was seeking of the Commission tonight. Mr. Gordon replied he was seeking approval of the conceptual land use plan. That they were looking at 60-90 days before annexation approval and they would have engineer's plans to present at that time. Mr. White asked for comments from the public present. A question was asked as to how many lots and housing units were planned. Mr. Gordon replied 400 single family lots and 40-60acres for multi -family which would consist of whatever the PUD allowed. It was noted that there is a 30 ft. height restriction on these units. Planning & Zoning Commission - Page two July 9, 1985 Curtis further stated that these multi -family units would be similar to the Lakewood concept, duplexes and townhomes. That they would require restrictive covenants along with the sale of the property/units. Curtis mentioned that they had already asked to be included in the next street assessment planned. Mr. Gordon was asked wasn't it true that the developers were responsible for paying for streets, improvements to streets, water/sewer installations, he replied yes. Larry Lindsey spoke from the audience saying he was an adjacent property owner and he would like to get oriented to the map. Mr. Gordon explained again the color coded areas. Dr. Mullins spoke saying he was very much in favor of the project although he had several concerns. He asked about the road access, he was assured there would be none off Parker Road (which he objected to), he was also concerned too about the multi -family that was shown at the bottom edge of the property which abutted his. Mr. Gordon explained that there would be proper landscaping and areas where the units would not be placed right on lines, there would be screening, natural growth, that they would have restrictive covenants and would not strip the area. Dr. Mullins said there were all single family up to the property line. He also asked about the lighted driving range. It was determined it was about 4 of a mile away. Roy told the property owners that this was the lst of at least 3 public hearings that would be held on this property and they would be notified to attend, that at the next hearing they would be presenting drainage plans, street utility and lot layouts and all these things would be considered at that time. Mr. Lindsay asked if the restrictive covenants would be ready by time of the next presentation and Mr. Gordon said he did not know. Mr. White called for any other comments from the Commission or the audience. Mary Doug asked if by giving approval today would be granting the waivers that would be required, whether or not this is wise. Curtis said that really the only problems they have are the required access to adjacent properties and the maximum block and cul-de-sac lengths. James Nix put in the form of a motion that the Commission accept upon its merit the conceptual plan presented as being the general development plan for Valley Creek. That we recognize the plan presented as a community unit concept and accept the land use as designated on the plan for recommend- ation to the City Council upon submission of written and legal descriptions by the applicant and that the applicant is encouraged to pursue the plan in consultation with the Commission and its staff so that the plans can be completed in a timely fashion to the City's minimum requirements under planned unit developments provisions and subdivision regulations. Cecil Pitman seconded and motion carried unanimously. Under old business, Tommie Werneth presented a report on the comprehensive plan update. She presented a copy of the survey showing number of responses. She said the land use analysis has been completed and the mapping is in the final stages. She suggested a work study session in a week to 10 days to further go over results. There being no further business, meeting was duly adjourned.