Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-06-2023 Planning Commission Agenda PacketSherry Sullivan Mqyor Council Members Kevin G. Boone Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Conyers COrey Martin Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC City Clerk Kimberly Creech City Treasurer 16 I Nonh Section Street P.O. Drawer 429 Fairhope, Alabama 36533 251-928·2136 251-928 -6776 Fax www.fairhopeal.gov !'rimed m mJ·c!t'd Ji.lpcr 1. 2. 3. City of Fairhope Planning Commission Agenda 5:00 PM Council Chambers July 6, 2023 Call to Order Approval of Minutes • June 5, 2023 Old/New Business • • • SD 21.37 The Reserve at Fairhope -Request of the Applicant, Jade Consulting LLC, for an extension of one year for preliminary plat approval. SD 23.11 Myrick Place -To discuss installation of sidewalks . SD 23.17 Laurelbrooke -Final plat discussion 4. Consideration of Agenda Items A. UR 23.08 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,078 LF of coaxial cable in the City ROW in the Tracery subdivision. B. UR 23.09 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,601 LF of buried fiber cable in the City ROW in the River Mill subdivision. C. UR 23.10 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 5,582 LF of buried fiber optic cable and 1.5" HDPE conduit in the City ROW and easements in the Live Oaks Estates Subdivision. Sherry Sullivan Mqyor Councl1 Members Kevin G. Boone Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Conyers Corey Martin Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC Ci{Y Clerk Kimberly Creech City Treasurer 161 North Section Street P.O. Drawer 429 Fairhope. Alabama 36533 251-928·2136 251 -928-6776 Fax www.fairhopeal.gov 5. D. UR 23.11 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,369 LF of buried coaxial cable in the City ROW in the Riverhorse Subdivision. E. UR 23.12 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 4,495 LF of buried coaxial cable in the City ROW in the Trentino Subdivision. F. SD 23.18 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Dewberry Engineers, Inc., acting on behalf of the Owner, FST and Dilworth Development, Inc., for Final Plat approval of Longbranch. The property is approximately 18.71 acres and is located on the north side of Twin Beech Rd., between County Road 13 and Thompson Hall Rd. PPIN #77788 G. SD 23.22 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Lieb Engineering Company, acting on behalf of the Owner, Venner LLC, for Venner LLC, a Multiple Occupancy Project. The property is approximately .60 acres and is located west of S. Greeno Road and south of Spring Run Drive. PPIN #91211 Adjourn [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes The Planning Commission met Monday, June 5, 2023, at 5:00 PM at the City Municipal Complex, 161 N. Section Street in the Council Chambers. Present: Lee Turner, Chairman; Rebecca Bryant, Councilman Jack Burrell; Harry Kohler; John Worsham; Hollie MacKellar; Erik Cortinas, Building Official; Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Manager; Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager; Michelle Melton, City Planner; Chris Williams, City Attorney; and Cindy Beaudreau, Planning Clerk. Absent: Clarice Hall-Black Chairman Turner called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. Approval of the Minutes May 1, 2023: John Worsham made a motion to approve the minutes from the May l, 2023, meeting. Erik Cortinas seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, and Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. Jack Burrell joined the meeting. Old/New Business: • SD 21.36 Old Battles Village -Phase 6 -Request of Applicant, Dewberry, for an extension of one year for preliminary plat approval. Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, presented the request for a one-year extension for preliminary plat approval of Old Battles Village -Phase 6. Motion: Eric Cortinas made a motion to recommend approval of SD 21.36. John Worsham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: Mr. Burrell asked if this was the first extension. Mr. Simmons confirmed that it is. A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. l L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes • SD 21.32 Windmill Professional Park MOP -Request of Applicant, S.E. Civil, for an extension of six months for final plat approval. Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, presented the request for a six-month extension for final plat approval of Windmill Professional Park MOP, explaining that the project is almost complete with all the infrastructure in and just a little greenspace that needs to be completed. This is also the first extension request. Motion: John Worsham made a motion to recommend approval of SD 21.32. Jack Burrell seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. • SD 23.11 Myrick Place -To discuss installation of sidewalks . Summary: Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager, opened the discussion for placement of sidewalks at Myrick Place. This case was heard at the April 2023, Planning Commission meeting. The applicant provided a 15' sidewalk easement with the agreement that sidewalks would be installed along Estella Street. The applicant has now provided a letter from an arborist asking that sidewalks not be installed due to the damage it could cause to the existing trees. The applicant provided photos of the existing areas along Estella Street and has proposed adding striping along the curb line behind the parking spots for a 5' wide walkway. Staff included potential options of: 1) installing the sidewalk on the south side of Estella Street which would require review and discussion with Richard Johnson, P .E., Public Works Director and may require additional engineering for drainage and cross walk locations; or 2) creating a sidewalk plan that provides internal connectivity through the development. Seth Moore explained that a pathway could be painted along the asphalt within the 15' easement. Mr. Moore agrees with the arborist that the trees would be damaged if a sidewalk was placed where originally planned. Chairman Turner asked what would happen where the painted pathway would stop. Mr. Moore stated that he believes a building will be built on Lot 1 so that the pathway could continue. A sidewalk could be built along Lot 1 and could be connected to the painted pathway. Mr. Burrell asked why the painted pathway does not extend the entire west to east. Mr. Moore stated that the concrete sidewalk can be placed once the building is built on Lot 1. Chairman Turner stated that he believes that the striping should only be in front of Lots 2 and 3 and then continue with a sidewalk in front of Lot 1. Mr. Moore thinks that the sidewalk could start after the driveway between Lots 1 and 2. Rebecca Bryant joined the meeting. 2 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes Mr. Simmons stated that this is a challenge due to cars backing into the walking path and suggested that Mr. Jeffries' proposals be considered. Erik Cortinas explained that there are ADA compliance and surface roughness issues to consider. Mr. Cortinas stated that one of the things that he battles during home construction is that sidewalks need to be laid out first then the cut from the road must ramp up to that. Oftentimes, when the ramp up for the drive hits the sidewalk, it ends up tilted the wrong way. So, laying the sidewalks out right from the beginning, allows for a clean slate on the south side of the road. Mr. Cortinas believes that the topography on the south side of the street would allow for a more even sidewalk and keeps from directing pedestrians into areas where cars are backing out. Mr. Moore stated that there are two manholes within the stretch on the south side of the road which could be a hindrance. Mr. Simmons suggested meandering the sidewalk. Mr. Burrell asked Mr. Myrick if he would be opposed to building the sidewalk on the south side of the road instead of the north side of the road. Mr. Myrick responded that he is not opposed to that, he just does not want to damage the trees. Mr. Burrell stated that he could not commit funds on behalf of the City Council for a sidewalk, but he may be able to seek funds due to the sidewalk being a connector sidewalk if built on the south side of the road. Mr. Moore acknowledged that it would be easier to build a sidewalk on the south side. Mr. Cortinas stated that connectivity may be hard to get on the north side of the road due to having to cross seven driveways, but on the south side there is 645 linear foot of a semi developed lot ending at Ingleside which would be much easier to do. Mr. Simmons stated that there are some unknowns on the south side of the road, but it appears to be a more suitable option. Mr. Simmons asked the Planning Commission if the bonding amount for this project could be used for issues that may arise during construction of the sidewalk. Motion: Chairman Turner requested a 30-day extension to allow time for staff to review the areas around Myrick Place. Consideration of Agenda Items: UR 23.06 Request of AT&T for an l 1.52.1 l Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 23,777 LF of buried fiber cable in the City ROW in the Song Grove, River Oaks, and Spring Run Subdivisions. Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, presented the request of AT&T for a utility review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 23,777 LF of buried fiber cable in the City ROW in the Song Grove, River Oaks, and Spring Run Subdivisions. Mr. Simmons showed an aerial of the proposed installation with the standard conditions. Mr. Cortinas asked if door hangers would be placed. Mr. Simmons confirmed there would be. Mr. Cortinas stated that West Chase Court is dense, and everyone parks on the street, the driveways, and the sidewalks. Mr. Simmons stated that prior to placing the door hangers, staff will call the phone number on the hangar to ensure that someone who can answer questions will answer that phone number. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 3 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes l. A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any pennits. 2. Consultation with the City's horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. 3. At all street crossing locations, conduct potholing to determine exact location and elevation of existing utilities. Reflect the exact elevation of utilities and GPS coordinates of the pothole locations on a set of as-built drawings. 4. An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures. 5. Follow-up activities below required by staff and the applicant: 6. Upon satisfactory review and approval by ROW Construction Inspector, as-builts will be submitted to the mapping technician for inclusion in GIS utility maps as needed. 7. Provide draft door hanger for approval at time of pre-construction. 8. Provide a Traffic Control Plan to ROW Inspector prior to commencement of any work. 9. Ensure enough space for proposed work is available within existing easement, if not applicant is responsible for either expanding existing easement or acquiring an additional easement. l 0. Applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities (750ft max per day). 11. Utilities boxes shall be concentrated near existing boxes. 12. For permitting purposes, applicants shall provide subsurface utility engineering quality-level C, unless otherwise required by the Fairhope Building Department. Motion: Jack Burrell made a motion to recommend approval of UR 23.06, subject to staff recommendations. Hollie MacKellar seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. UR 23.07 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 15,391 LF of 1.5" conduit in the City ROW in the Fairfield and Founders Subdivision. Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, presented the request of AT&T for a utility review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 15,391 LF of l .5'' conduit in the City ROW in the Fairfield and Founders Subdivision. Mr. Simmons showed an aerial of the proposed installation with the standard conditions. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 4 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes 1. A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. 2. Consultation with the City's horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. 3. At all street crossing locations, conduct potholing to detennine exact location and elevation of existing utilities. Reflect the exact elevation of utilities and GPS coordinates of the pothole locations on a set of as-built drawings. 4. An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures. 5. Follow-up activities below required by staff and the applicant: 6. Upon satisfactory review and approval by ROW Construction Inspector, as-builts will be submitted to the mapping technician for inclusion in GIS utility maps as needed. 7. Provide draft door hanger for approval at time of pre-construction. 8. Provide a Traffic Control Plan to ROW Inspector prior to commencement of any work. 9. Ensure enough space for proposed work is available within existing easement, if not applicant is responsible for either expanding existing easement or acquiring an additional easement. l 0. Applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities (750ft max per day). 11. Utilities boxes shall be concentrated near existing boxes. 12. For permitting purposes, applicants shall provide subsurface utility engineering quality-level C, unless otherwise required by the Fairhope Building Department. Motion: Jack Burrell made a motion to recommend approval of UR 23.07, subject to staff recommendations. John Worsham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. UR 23.08 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,078 LF of coaxial cable in the City ROW in the Tracery subdivision. Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, stated that UR 23.08 is being withheld until the July meeting. UR 23.09 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,601 LF of buried fiber cable in the City ROW in the River Mill subdivision. Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, stated that UR 23.09 is being withheld until the July meeting. 5 r L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes IR 23.02 Request of the Applicant, Jade Consulting, LLC, for an Infonnal Review of Hill Top PUD, Lot 29. The property is approximately 1.14 acres and is located west of South Section Street and north of Hyacinth Street. PPIN #389630 Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, presented an Informal Review of Hill Top PUD, Lot 29. This requested was initiated due to the property being unzoned. The area is mostly residential and has been annexed into the City within a PUD. Mr. Simmons showed the PUD site plan with Lot 29 in the lower right-hand comer. Lot 29 had not been considered for development due to it being a remnant of the highway construction setback from the unzoned and unincorporated subdivision. There are a couple of plans that will be shown that meet the 100' setback, but the main issue is the need to amend the PUD since the 100' setback made it into the PUD and was approved by City Council. There are some wetlands towards the front. Looking south of the project there are subdivisions with 30' setbacks. Staff agrees with amending this PUD to include a 30' setback instead of the 100' setback. Trey Jinright, Jade Consulting, explained that the project is a PUD which gives the City more flexibility than a commercially zoned property. This PUD has a commercial use, but Jade has not researched how the property should be used. Now that the developer, Mr. Tickle, is ready to move forward, Jade is requesting input on what the City would like the property to look like and be used for. The property has the potential to be a cornerstone area. Mr. Jinright asked the Planning Commission if they had ideas for design criteria. Mr. Jinright stated that the 100' construction setback is too much because the chances of the road being built out that much is slim. He believes the area could become a nice pedestrian zone and sidewalks have already begun being built in the project to the south of this project. Mr. Jinright shared some proposed renderings that show what the area could look like. Trees were included in the renderings to show that the buildings would be shaded by new or existing vegetation. The vehicles would park to the side and rear of the structure. The renderings meet the requirements of the PUD. Rebecca Bryant was curious about the uses. She stated that prior suggestions were community building, guest house and hospitality. Mr. Simmons stated that nothing has been proposed yet, but there are limits to the uses. Mr. Jinright explained that he believes it may end up being a marketplace with maybe a wine and cheese shop. Chairman Turner believes the area has a lot of potential and he is concerned with the height. He stated that the closer the building to the road, the less scale he would like to see, but likes the renderings. Mr. Jinright stated that he will stay within the residential height restriction. Mr. Simmons stated that below the property is the TR district which include a 30' landscape buffer. Ms. Bryant liked that the parking was to the side and back. SD 23.19 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Trae Corte, acting on behalf of the Owner, Sena, Inc., for Multiple Occupancy Project Preliminary and Final Plat approval for Belle Vie. The property is approximately .40 acres and is located on the northeast comer of Fairhope Avenue and North Bayview Street. PPIN #15283 Summary: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, presented the request of the Applicant, Trae Corte, acting on behalf of the Owner, Sena, Inc., for Multiple Occupancy Project Preliminary and Final Plat approval for Belle Vie. Mr. Simmons addressed an e-mail that the Planning Commission received regarding the Tree Committee meeting and whether the meeting was advertised properly and after checking with the City Clerk, it had been. The intent for this project is to create four condominium lots with single family homes. Mr. Simmons showed the aerial of the property. Because this application is 6 l L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes for four or fewer units and requires no installation of public infrastructure, the Applicant may submit for simultaneous preliminary and final approval. The Zoning Ordinance requires two parking spaces per unit. Eight spaces will be required with six provided. The Applicant proposes creating two parking spaces in the N. Bayview Street right-of-way. The Fairhope Electrical department will require a 10'xl5' easement for an electric transformer and gutters will be required to tie into the drainage system. An O&M Plan is required, but has not been received. There are two Heritage Magnolia Trees, 30" and 36" in diameter, that the Applicant proposed to remove. The City's Horticulture Supervisor, Jamie Rollins, denied the removal of the trees. Mr. Rollins consulted with the Tree Committee who voted to allow the two trees to be removed with the condition that two 12" dbh live oaks are planted in the N. Bayview Street right-of-way. During the Tree Committee meeting, the Applicant stated that there is also a tree on the comer that may be partially in the right-of-way. This tree is not shown on the plans, but City employees measured a cedar tree at 22" dbh and suspected that it is within the right-of-way. The location of this tree may conflict with the proposed drainage basin. A tree survey submitted with a previously proposed project illustrates another 22' cedar and 19" oak that are not shown on the plans that were submitted with this application. The City employees measured the oak tree and found it to be 20.5" which would make it protected as well. There are some conflicts between the two tree surveys. Chairman Turner asked if there is supposed to be a landscape plan submitted with the application. Mr. Simmons stated yes, and that Heritage Trees are protected in the CBD. The City does not allow the clearing of trees in the CBD from lot line to lot line. The Planning Commission could deny the removal of the trees and the only recourse is appealing it to a court. It is challenging to approve a project without all the required information. Mr. Simmons shared the revised tree protection and removal plan and believes that every tree on site being removed and two crepe myrtles in the right-of-way. Mr. Simmons stated that a sidewalk exists on Fairhope A venue, but neither a sidewalk, nor a sidewalk easement are provided along N. Bayview Street. The Applicant may agree to install a sidewalk along N. Bayview Street, or the Planning Commission may allow an easement in lieu of an installed sidewalk, but if neither a sidewalk, nor an easement is provided, a waiver is required. A waiver request needs to be advertised and it was not advertised for this meeting. John Worsham asked how a sidewalk would fit along N. Bayview Street with the parking. Mr. Simmons stated that it could happen but would be a challenge due to the trees and the landscape plan did not include the two 12" oak trees as the Tree Committee recommended. An accurate landscape plan is needed to show how all of this would work. The proposed buildings are zero-lot line units, which require unique considerations regarding building codes. Although single-family is an allowed use within the B-3b zoning, there are other uses allowed, either "by right", subject to special conditions, or available on appeal within the Fairhope Zoning Ordinance. To avoid confusion for future landowners, staff would be in favor of a note added to the MOP plat stating any use permitted by the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance is allowed on either of the 4 condominium lots. Staff recommends denial of preliminary and final approval of Belle Vie MOP SD 23.19, based on the following reasons: l. Provide a proposed Landscape Plan as required by Sec. 20.5-3.2 of the Municipal Code prior to any land disturbance activity. Plan shall show all Heritage Trees and adjacent right-of-way trees. Final Plans shall be approved by the City of Fairhope Planning Department and Horticulture Department. 2. Other mitigation may be required for removal of any other protected trees, whether a Heritage Tree or trees within the right-of-way, as determined by the City's Horticulture Department. 7 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes 3. A Final Landscape plan shall be provided that includes any mitigation that may be required, as well as new landscaping as required by the Tree Ordinance prior to any construction activity on the subject property. 4. A preliminary MOP plat shall be submitted that illustrates setbacks, condominium lots, building footprints, common areas, a site data table, Engineer's Certificate, as well as any notes to address comments within this report or included within the Subdivision Regulations. 5. A preliminary Condominium Plat that includes the legal boundaries, easements, common areas, etc. a. A 1 0'x 15' easement shall be included for the Electric Department transfonner. 6. The MOP Plat, Condominium Plat, Re-plat and O&M plan shall not be recorded until the project receives final approval from the Planning Commission. 7. If approved, construction plans shall be provided for any Land Disturbance activity such as, but not limited to, drainage installations, demolition, and grading. 8. A Tree Removal pennit will be required for any removal or pruning of any Heritage Tree. 9. A Tree Removal permit, and a right-of way permit, will be required any removal or pruning of any tree within the City of Fairhope right-of-way. 10. Roofs are to be guttered and tied to the drainage line. The system will need cleanouts installed. 11. An Operation and Maintenance Plan shall be submitted to provide long-term maintenance of the drainage system. 12. The Planning Commission has approved the installation of two (2) parking spaces in the N. Bayview St. right-of-way for credit of one onsite parking space; and either allows credit for two existing nearby spaces for the other required onsite parking space, or an alternative, such as bicycle parking is approved. 13. A sidewalk shall be installed on N. Bayview St., an easement for a future sidewalk shall be provided inside the property line that does not conflict with other requirements, or the Planning Commission grants a waiver to not provide either at final approval. 14. A waiver is granted so that the Applicant does not have to provide drainage easements. After consulting with Public Works, Staff would support this waiver. This condition is included to ensure the Applicant knows to ask for the waiver at time of final approval. 15. Applicant consults with Erik Cortinas, the Building Official, regarding fire codes and building codes to the extent condominium lots can be finalized. 16. Use cannot be restricted to single-family residential. 17. If approved, a Right-of-way permit will be required for the parking pads and walkways on N . Bayview St. 18. A land disturbance permit will be required to install the drainage infrastructure. A grading and BMP plan shall be required prior to an application for permit. Drainage infrastructure shall be installed prior to final approval. 8 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes Trae Corte proposed building four single family homes on two lots. Mr. Corte spoke about the prior hotel proposal and the issues that the neighbors had with that proposal. He believes that he can address those issues in his project, and it is a better use of the property. He wants to face all four units onto Fairhope Avenue and to do that there is only one driveway in the back to service all of the homes, which happens to be exactly where the existing driveway to the house is now. Mr. Corte discussed the tree removal and how leaving one of the trees will cause two of the parking spaces to be parallel to the buildings with the tree in between. Mr. Corte agreed to install a sidewalk along N. Bayview Street if needed. There is 20' between the paved road and the property line where a sidewalk can be installed. The parallel parking spots will take 12' with 8' remaining for a sidewalk. Mr. Corte explained that there are three trees that were omitted from the landscape plan. They were omitted because his surveyor reported that they were less than 20". When looking at the hotel site plan, it shows a 19" oak in the northeast comer which does not fall within the Tree Ordinance, but Mr. Corte agreed to leave that tree. The cedar tree was omitted because it does not have any limbs on it. The cedar on the comer is approximately 50 % in the right-of-way. Mr. Corte agreed to leave that tree. Mr. Corte addressed the difference in location of the magnolia tree. There are two historical lots that measure 66' wide by 132' deep. The two magnolia trees are in the center of the comer lot which makes that lot completely useless. One of these magnolias has grown into the foundation of the house so once the house is removed, the tree could be killed. Mr. Corte admitted to accidentally not submitting a landscape plan with the two live oaks but agreed to add them to his plan. He proposed removing the crepe myrtles and replacing them with a 12" live oak. Originally a wall was proposed for the drainage structure, but to avoid any liability, they will build a curb to keep the gravel in with two benches, a fountain, and flowers. Staff stated that the drainage structure needs to be complete prior to final approval. Mr. Corte requested that the preliminary plat be approved and once the drainage structure is complete, he will return for final approval. Mr. Corte explained that the condos were proposed due to not being able to do a 4-lot subdivision. The site plan that was submitted is not part of a MOP submittal, it was added as an example of what he would do. Mr. Corte explained that he is building a land condo not a building condo, so the condo docs will not show the buildings, they will only show the lot. Mr. Corte stated that his surveyor would sign off on the MOP since there is no engineering component of it but agreed to have an Engineer sign it. Mr. Corte believes that the MOP is complete, and the boundaries are as the condo docs will show. Mr. Corte stated that he and Erik Cortinas met to discuss fire walls between the condo lines and that will be addressed. Mr. Corte did not agree with not restricting the project to single family use but will not argue that point. Mr. Corte acknowledged that he still needed several permits. He has no problems with the roofs being tied into the gutters. Mr. Corte agreed to the electrical easement. John Worsham listed all the items that are missing from Mr. Corte's request and asked what they were being asked to approve. Mr. Corte stated that his MOP plat was complete. Mr. Simmons stated that the MOP plat needs to show the buildings and a condominium lot shows the land. The Engineering stamp on a MOP plat states that everything will be built as designed which holds them accountable for monitoring the construction. The land condominium plat just shows the legal boundaries. Mr. Worsham reiterated that the landscape plan was missing. Rebecca Bryant stated that it must be approved by a landscape architect. Mr. Corte stated he could have one stamped in a couple of days. He stated that he did not do that because he was unsure whether this project would be approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Corte explained the cost associated with these items. Ms. Bryant stated that the staff is also spending a lot of time and energy on this project with the number of conditions due to an incomplete application. Mr. Corte does not believe his application is incomplete and that many of the conditions can be fixed in days. Mr. Bryant reiterated the number of conditions. Mr. Worsham stated that as an Engineer, they just do not blind stamp. Mr. Simmons stated that the drainage plans must be 9 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes designed by an Engineer per regulations. There were continued discussions regarding what was missing from the application and the plans. Mr. Corte continued to state that his application met all criteria and asked the Planning Commission if they are opposed to this development. Chairman Turner stated that the City has done a lot to help with the plan and acknowledged that Mr. Corte does great projects, but is concerned about setting a precedent of approving a project with so many conditions. Chairman Turner listed the different plans that Mr. Corte has provided for this project to comply with the regulations which, at times, create other issues. Chairman Turner listed some of the issues that are still outstanding on this project along with stating that it looks difficult to be able to fit four lots on the property. Chairman Turner continued that there would need to be a lot of exceptions to make this project work and he does not want to start setting precedents. Mr. Corte reiterated that leaving the magnolia tree in the middle of the lot keeps that lot from being used. Mr. Simmons suggested leaving the houses and using them for some type of bed and breakfast or four units. There is the possibility of the garage being turned into the fourth unit. Those could tum into four short term units. The house is considered a contributing structure as far as historical preservation goes; however, the City currently does not have a historical preservation ordinance and the fate of the contributing structure is the sole prerogative of the owner. Staff looks at what could be done on the property and what alternatives could be considered. Mr. Simmons stated that he is not opposed to this plan but believes there are alternatives where the trees could be saved. Mr. Simmons explained the time it takes staff to review all the complete applications and that Mr. Corte's application was not complete. Mr. Simmons is concerned about a precedent being set that applications do not need to be complete in order to come before the Planning Commission. Mr. Worsham also stated that the plan is not a terrible plan, but would like to have the missing items submitted. Ms. Bryant stated that there have been many conversations among the Planning Commission about not accepting projects with large amounts of conditions. Ms. Bryant asked what a drainage plan means if it is not tied to the land coverage and roof area. Mr. Simmons stated that there are two plans stating different things. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 6:22pm. Julie Pate, l ON. Bayview Street, stated that this project will have a significant impact on overcrowding and drainage. There is a lot of water that comes from that way and does not believe a pretty fountain can handle it. She believes that the project needs to be developed in accordance with what is around there and does not believe that anyone would be able to breathe with four houses on that property. She would like it to be developed in a way that everyone can enjoy. Alison Knight, 50 N. Bayview Street, has a concern about the parking. She believes that if the project requires eight parking spaces, they should be incorporated into the building. She agrees with Mr. Simmons about leaving the property as is. Len Young, Bluffs neighborhood, has several issues beginning with why a vote has not been taken yet. With all the conditions and if the protocol is to wait until all of the issues are addressed, then procedure should be followed. He believes that this being a substandard lot, there is no room for four houses. He believes that the trees should be left and stated that his house is sitting on top of a huge magnolia that will end up winning the battle against the house because he speaks from personal experience. This project is in a historic part of town and will disrupt the fabric of the community. He stated that a line should be drawn to retain the flavor of the historic part of the community and that historic designations need to be revisited. [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes James Prestwood, 54 Fairhope Avenue, has two issues with this project. One is the density. The property is .4 acres, and the request is for four single family residences. It is too tight. The second issue is parking. During Fairhope events, parking on Fairhope is a nightmare and then to consider adding more parking spaces will only make it worse. The public hearing was closed at 6:28pm. Jack Burrell asked if any of the parking credits been issued to any surrounding developments. Mr. Simmons answered that there is not a cumulative list. Staff would have to review all the minutes from previous meetings. Mr. Burrell stated that the City does not have an infinite number of parking credits. Chairman Turner stated that when looking at parking credits, it was not necessarily for single family residences, they are more for hotel and overflow parking. Mr. Cortinas stated that his office issues the right-of-way parking permits and that it started to be limited because throughout the Fruit and Nut district, people have built as big a house as possible with a garage, then want to pave the whole front for parking. What his office began doing was requiring a pervious surface which limits the amount of concrete. This project is not dissimilar to that, but at the same time, when looking at it as a building permit, he would not accept an application that is missing six different documents that he would need to make an accurate assessment. Mr. Cortinas stated that he does not ever remember a project that had this many conditions and that his staff are the ones that must track the conditions. It becomes extremely difficult to track that many conditions prior to issuing a building permit or a land disturbance permit. Many of these conditions are based on City regulations that could get missed when there are this many conditions. Mr. Cortinas requires a clean set of documents to review so that the project moves along smoother. When missing so many documents, it is hard to ensure that the regulations are being met. Chris Williams, City Attorney, outlined the Planning Commission's options. Now that the public hearing has been opened and closed: 1) the Applicant can agree to table the project until the next meeting or a certain time to clean up these conditions and submit a project that meets more of the conditions. The Planning Commission cannot table the project, it would need to act now; 2) the Planning Commission can approve the preliminary plat or final plat together as one or separately approve the preliminary plat by itself with certain conditions and deny the request for final plat; or 3) the Planning Commission can deny everything outright. Mr. Williams asked, though, if the Planning Commission were to deny the preliminary and final plat, that they list the reasons why. If the preliminary and final plat are denied, the Applicant has 180 days before a new application can be submitted, unless the Applicant works with staff to remedy the deficiencies. Mr. Corte requested that the project be tabled but asked the Planning Commission if the project would be denied when he returns. Mr. Corte addressed the parking issue again stating that the two on street spaces are spaces that he added within his project. Mr. Simmons stated that if a project has two on street parking spaces, there must be four off-site. That section also allows bicycle parking. These options may give the project the required amount of parking. Mr. Williams reiterated that with the public hearing being over, the Planning Commission can agree to table the project, but they do not have to. If Mr. Corte had asked for the project to be tabled before the public hearing, the decision would not be up to the Planning Commission. Chairman Turner feels that there are too many conditions and with the combination of the density, the trees and the on-street parking, there are a lot of things that he does not like about the project. Chairman Turner acknowledged the price of Fairhope property, but believes this project would change the character of the area. Mr. Simmons stated that he receives many one-page applications asking for approval and that the reason for all the pages in the regulations is to ensure that staff is vetting all the goals which is hard to do when all the documentation is not included. Chairman 11 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes Turner stated there is a lot that he likes about the project, but there are just too many conditions right now. Mr. Corte again requested that the project be tabled to allow him to work through the conditions. Mr. Simmons stated that the conditions with the landscape plan are not minor. The Tree Ordinance must be followed. Mr. Bryant stated that by keeping the single-family residences separate, the project is destroying more area, instead of using duplexes or quadplexes which require a smaller footprint. Mr. Burrell asked about the sidewalk waiver. Mr. Corte stated that he is not asking for a waiver, he will install sidewalks on Bayview. Mr. Burrell asked if the project had to be tabled for 30 days or could it be until the conditions are met. Mr. Williams stated that if they choose to table the project, it should be with certain conditions, for instance, the next Planning Commission meeting or a future Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Worsham asked if they could leave the time frame open. Mr. Burrell suggested that it be left open until the Planning Director and Applicant are satisfied that the project is ready. Holly MacKellar stated that a time frame needs to be agreed on. Mr. Williams stated that it should be a time frame or a criterion of conditions. Mr. Worsham suggested that the project be tabled until the application is complete. Mr. Simmons clarified that the Tree Ordinance requires a landscape plan by a landscape architect. Mr. Cortinas suggested that the item be placed on the August agenda or no later than the September meeting for a decision . Ms. MacKellar stated that she believes there were guidelines for the timeframes . Mr. Williams stated that once the item is on the next agenda, the Planning Commission will have to act on it. Mr. Simmons stated that he would be more comfortable giving the project more time. Ms. Bryant asked for clarification that if the project is tabled, would it be the same application if it is substantially different. Mr. Simmons stated that if the Planning Commission tabled this project tonight, then the Applicant could still change the project without a new application. Motion : John Worsham made a motion to table SD 21.19, at the request of the Applicant, until no later than the September 2023 meeting. Erik Cortinas seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. SD 23.20 Public hearing to consider the request of the Owner, Ronald E. Johnson, for resubdivision of Lot 13, Preliminary and Final Plat approval for Johnson Subdivision. The property is approximately .62 acres and is located in between Middle Street and Fairland Avenue, east of Mershon Street. PPIN #46343 Summary: Michelle Melton, City Planner, presented the Johnson 2-lot minor subdivision, preliminary and final plat approval. Ms. Melton shared the site plan and the original plat from 1942 . Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Add note on Final Plat regarding using the then current setbacks at the time an applicant applies for a land disturbance and/or building permit. 12 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes 2. Final Plat shall have a l O' sidewalk/pedestrian easement along Middle Street and Fairland Avenue. 3. Final Plat shall have the required 15' utility drainage easement on the rear and sides of the lot. 4. Add the FFE note to Final Plat as stated in report above. 5. Lots on the Plat shall be labeled 13-A and 13-B. 6. Engineer/Owner shall provide an Agent Authorization Letter. Mr. Burrell asked for the size of the smallest lot. Ms. Melton stated that it is 11,262.26 sq ft. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 6:50pm. Sally Bums, owns property on Middle Street, asked about the fire hydrants. She wondered if the owner will be responsible for adding fire hydrants. Chairman Turner stated that there is a fire hydrant located within the required number of feet from the project. The public hearing was closed at 6:52pm. Motion: John Worsham made a motion to recommend approval of SD 23.20 subject to staff recommendations. Hollie MacKellar seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, and Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. SD 23.21 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, S.E. Civil, acting on behalf of the Owner, FST and Drexel E. Boothe, for Final Plat approval of Morphy Place. The property is approximately 0. 75 acres and is located on the northwest comer of the intersection of Morphy Avenue and Bishop Road. PPIN #243093 Summary: Michelle Melton, City Planner, presented the Morphy Place 3-lot minor subdivision, preliminary and final plat approval. Ms. Melton shared the site plan and aerial of the project. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: l. Change Subdivision name. Alternative name shall be approved by the Fairhope Plann ing Department. 2. Add 15' utility/drainage easements on the Final Plat. 3. Change signature block to Planning Commission on Final Plat. 4. Add FFE's for each lot on the Final Plat. 5. Add note: Access to Lot-3 shall come from the north l/3 of the lot adjacent to Bishop Road or any joint agreement with owners of Lot-2. 6. Install sidewalks along Morphy Ave. 13 [ L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes Mr. Burrell asked if the Fairhope Single Tax District had to approve this. Chainnan Turner stated no and continued that as President, he signs any application that comes up due to the Fairhope Single Tax being neutral on any subdivision and zoning. The only reason that they sign the applicants is for bank purposes. Aaron Collins, S.E. Civil, was there to answer questions. They agree with all conditions of the project. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 6:58pm. Having no one present to speak, the public hearing was closed at 6:58pm. Chairman Turner asked that the aerial slide be presented and asked for Ms. Bryant's input at the next meeting about the setbacks being 35' on Bishop and 20' on Morphy. In this case, all the houses facing Morphy will have a 35' setback but this project will have a 20' side setback on Morphy. This should be considered when approving new subdivisions. Mr. Simmons asked Mr. Collins if he would see if his clients would consider a larger setback on Morphy. Mr. Collins agreed. Mr. Simmons stated that the sidewalk is going into the property also. Mr. Burrell asked about the sidewalk requirement on Morphy, but not on Bishop. Mr. Simmons stated that there is already a sidewalk on Bishop. Ms. Bryant acknowledged that there is a good opportunity to improve the side street setback which makes sense if it is a primary street and a side street, but if they are both primary streets, it is odd to have the house shoved up against it. It is a good opportunity to improve the regulations in the future. Motion: Rebecca Bryant made a motion to approve Case SD 23.21 with staff recommendations along with adding the new name. Harry Kohler seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, and Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. SD 23.04 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Goodwyn Mills Cawood, acting on behalf of the Owner, Gayfer Village Partners, for Preliminary Plat approval of Klumpp PUD. The property is approximately 75.85 acres and is located north of Fairhope Avenue and west of State Highway 181. PPIN #236701 Summary: Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager, presented Klumpp, a 15-lot PUD for preliminary plat approval. Mr. Jeffries shared the site plan and aerial of the project along with the wetlands. There are some sidewalk conflicts, but the Water and Sewer Department will work through that with the Applicant. There was a traffic study performed for this project and states that there are no recommended traffic improvements to the Gayfer Road Extension with the exception of a very high traffic generator on one of the corner properties, such as a gas station. Mr. Jeffries acknowledged the large number of conditions for this project, but stated that the difference between this project and Belle Vie is that this request is only for preliminary plat approval and the project will have to come back to the Planning Commission for final plat approval. Mr. Simmons added that many of these conditions are federal requirements with ALDOT that require outside Corp permits. This is also an 80-acre mixed use 14 ( L June 5 , 2023 Planning Commission Minutes development, not .4 acres with four homes. The City of Fairhope Utilities Department has ten standard conditions that are included with all similar projects . Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Traffic improvements and/or drainage improvements recommended by the Traffic Study and/or ALDOT will be installed by the Developer prior to application for Final Plat. 2. Drainage updates per Neel-Schaffer requests shall be provided prior to building pennit application. 3. Approval for the constructed wetland/north detention is subject to any recommendations or modifications that may arise from the third-party review from Wetland Resources. 4. Final placement, capacity, and aid to construction costs for all utilities shall be approved by the respective superintendent. Aid to construction costs shall be determined prior to application of building permit. 5. All sidewalks and street trees are required to be installed prior to final plat application. 6. Uses in Unit 3 shall be limited to those specified within the TIS . A revised TIS may be required. 7. All existing buildings and structures must be removed before final plat application. 8. The landscape island inside the roundabout shall be shown and labeled "Common Area" on the plat with a note that clearly states the Owner is responsible for the maintenance. 9. Revise note 6 on the plat to read PUD Ordinance #1764. l 0. Provide a sidewalk handicap ramp detail at time of building pennit to be reviewed and approved. Truncated dome shall be wet set. 11. Correct the O&M Plan to reflect 5-year inspection schedule prior to recording. 12. The schematic layout of sidewalks has known conflicts and shall be resolved prior to submittal for building permit. The EOR shall monitor construction ensure additional sidewalk conflicts do not arise or are remedied in a way that still complies with ADA. Any changes shall be designed by the EOR and submitted for approval by the City of Fairhope. 13. Revise site plan to show where boardwalks will be in place instead of sidewalks and include a detail for the proposed boardwalks to be reviewed and approved by the City of Fairhope. 14. Revise landscape plan to include landscaping and sod near detention pond. 15. Add a map of the north and south drainage basins to the Drainage Narrative. 16. New digital submittal package containing the items referenced under "General Comments". Scott Hutchinson, GMC, is available for questions and appreciates the thoroughness of the staff conditions. Mr. Hutchinson acknowledged the mixed uses of the project and the variety of reviews that the project will go through. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 7: l 8pm. Gary Gover, 300 Lincoln Street, met with school administrators who stated that they had not been notified about the impact of the growth in the area. Mr. Gover explained the need for safe routes for the children and bicycles and stated that the City should take a leadership role to address these issues. Another issue is school busing for the schools which will increase their pickup and delivery of the children. He believes this should be included in the plan for the development and should be coordinated 15 ( L June 5, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes in advance with the schools . Mr. Gover believes that traffic studies should include pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Chainnan Turner stated that Bay Minette does include those figures in their report. He is unsure if the information makes it to the schools. He continued to state that the sidewalk across the street on Fairhope Avenue was a Fairhope Singl~ Tax project that predates him and that backs up to ldlewild and may be the least used sidewalk in Fairhope. Ms. Bryant asked Mr. Gover ifhe had an example of anyone that has a good pedestrian study, parallel to the traffic study. She has never seen one and states that it would be good ifthere was a precedent that Fairhope could follow. Mr. Gover stated that he was familiar with complete street studies and smart growth and other states have done successful studies, but Fairhope is still in the queue. The public hearing was closed at 7:23pm. Mr. Burrell confirmed that this was preliminary approval. Chairman Turner stated that this will not go to City Council due to this being the first round to the subdivision and that the final plat approval will be brought back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Cortinas commented that the project includes a detailed constructed wetlands on one of the lots. This plan has been sent out for third party review and has not been received back yet. Mr. Cortinas asked that staff verify that Lots I and 2 be open ended until the report has been received. If for some reason, the wetland must be increased, the road may need to be pushed back which would intrude into Lot I, which will not be known until the report is back. Ms. Bryant asked for confinnation that the constructed wetlands are to satisfy the Corps and the City, and that the third-party review is for storm water treatment. Mr. Cortinas replied that it is for the treatment and to satisfy the capacity and he just wants to make sure that the constructed wetland plan fully meets the City regulations. Chairman Turner asked if Mr. Cortinas was comfortable with condition #3. Mr. Cortinas is, but wants Mr. Hutchinson to know that the report could impact Lots l and 2, if something must change. Mr. Hutchinson acknowledged Mr. Cortinas' concerns. Mr. Cortinas then addressed the number of conditions and the difference between this case and Belle Vie. He stated that there are four items that are corrections to documents that have already been received and all the other conditions must follow the Traffic Information Study which has also been submitted. With no disrespect to Mr. Corte, the difference is that these documents have been received and his have not. Mr. Simmons added that these conditions are instructions to future staff in case the project is not developed right away. Motion: John Worsham made a motion to approve Case SD 23.04 subject to staff recommendations. Erik Cortinas seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar, and Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. 16 [ L June 5. 2023 Planning Commission Minutes Executive Session -To discuss pending or potential litigation pursuant to Alabama Code Section 36- 25-7(a)(3). Attorney Chris Williams made a declaration to move to Executive Session to discuss pending litigation. He does not anticipate any action needed following the Executive Session. Chainnan Turner asked if there should be an estimate of how long the session will be. Mr. Williams stated that it should be a short sess10n. Motion: Jack Burrell made a motion to close the public meeting and move to Executive Session and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, Harry Kohler, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar, and Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. The Commissioners left the dais at 7:29 p.m. The Commissioners returned to the dais at 8:06 p.m. Chainnan Turner reconvened the public meeting. Adjournment John Worsham made a motion to adjourn. Rebecca Bryant seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously with the following vote: A YE: Lee Turner, Jack Burrell, Rebecca Bryant, John Worsham, Harry Kohler, Hollie MacKellar and Erik Cortinas. NAY: None. Adjourned at 8: 12pm. Lee Turner, Chairman Cindy Beaudreau, Secretary 17 This digital package has been condensed for size and some documents may not contain all the original pages. All submittals were reviewed in full by staff in preparation for the reports prepared for the Planning Commission. ORNATE AVEORNATE AVE City of FairhopePlanning Commission July 6, 2023 ¯ORNATE AVEORNATE AVE UR 23.08 - Mediacom Coaxial Cable Installation Legend Roads UR23_08Mediacom Parcels Corporate LimitsZoning Classification R-2 - Medium Density Single-Family Planning Jurisdiction ^ Project Name: Mediacom Coaxial Cable InstallationSite Data: 3,078 Linear FootProject Type: Mediacom Coaxial Cable InstallationJurisdiction: Fairhope Planning JurisdictionZoning District: R-2PPIN Number: N/AGeneral Location: Tracery SubdivisionSurveyor of Record: MediacomEngineer of Record: MediacomOwner / Developer: MediacomSchool District: Fairhope Elementary School Fairhope Middle and High Schools Recommendation: Approved w/ConditionsPrepared by: Chris Ambron µ µ 2 UR 23.08 Mediacom – June 6, 2023 Summary of Request: Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,078 linear feet of coaxial cable along routes outlined on the below location map. T R .C ERY SU IB !V IS ION PH 5 PH 4 ORNA T VE PH 3 ORN ATE AV - PH 2 EW MEDI COM U J ERGROUND PH 6 PH 1 0 0:::: u z 0:::: 3= <( _J 3 UR 23.08 Mediacom – June 6, 2023 CPH CHALLENGER SERIES PEDESTALS CPH911 , CPH920 , CPH1022 0 CPH 9tt CPH 1022 DIMENSIONS /' ' A B C D CPH 9 1 1 13.0" 9.5 " 14 .5" 10.5 " (330mm ) (2 40mm) (370mm) (265mm) CPH 920 22.0 " 9.5 " 14.5" 10.5" (560mm ) (240mm ) (370mm ) (26 5mm ) CPH 1022 24.0 ' 10.75 " 14.5" 10.5" (610mm ) (275 mm ) (370mm) (265mm ) Nole: Dimens ions in inc~e, (mm) C D li 4 UR 23.08 Mediacom – June 6, 2023 1. Citizen Communication & Notification • Provide Door Hangers at preconstruction meetings which shall be approved prior to distribution and work. • Use of portable A-frame style signage at the entrance and exit of work sites. • Applicant shall dedicate a Point of Contact to answer citizens questions. 2. Permitting, Locating & Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A phasing plan must be submitted with the permit to alleviate confusion for locating. • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. 3. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). 5 UR 23.08 Mediacom – June 6, 2023 4. Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. 5. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. • 6. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, & As Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency. 6 UR 23.08 Mediacom – June 6, 2023 7.Staff Recommendation •The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. •This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: i.City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands. ii.City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas. iii.City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398). iv.Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (#1754) v.City of Fairhope Tree and Landscape Ordinance (#1444) •Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions of UR 23.08 COUNTY RD 48 RIVER MILL DR JACOB CT ELEANOR CT SOUTH SIDE LOOP City of FairhopePlanning Commission July 6, 2023 ¯ COUNTY RD 48 JACOB CT SOUTH SIDE LOOP UR 23.09 - Mediacom Fiber Installation Legend Roads UR23_09Mediacom Parcels Corporate Limits Zoning Classification B-4 - Business and Professional District PUD - Planned Unit Development R-1 - Low Density Single-Family R-2 - Medium Density Single-Family R-3 - High Density Single-Family R-A - Residential/Agriculture District Planning Jurisdiction ^ Project Name: Mediacom Fiber InstallationSite Data: 3,601 Linear FootProject Type: Mediacom Fiber InstallationJurisdiction: Fairhope Planning JurisdictionZoning District: R-3PPIN Number: N/AGeneral Location: River Mill SubdivisionSurveyor of Record: MediacomEngineer of Record: MediacomOwner / Developer: MediacomSchool District: Fairhope Elementary School Fairhope Middle and High Schools Recommendation: Approved w/ConditionsPrepared by: Chris Ambron µ µ 2 UR 23.09 Mediacom – June 5, 2023 Summary of Request: Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,601 linear feet of buried fiber along routes outlined on the below location map. RIV E< MILL SU I DIV 1c;10 CROSS NCJ S EEL CR EEK COL RT I I \E . /E ;I~ ,0 ~ -{ ,, ~, E ,; • JI\. : \ I-u 0:: 0 L ·• .=:i C~OSSt\G :S \ I u z 0 !:r. :> \ \ \ \ .------'----" / -s .. ~oss r---G 2 CROSSI\JG D~A I '\ J L C0 -48/:-,lt,l l~HOI ' E 3 UR 23.09 Mediacom – June 5, 2023 DIMENSIONS ,r " A B C D CPH 9 11 13.0 " 9.5 " 14.5 " 10 .5 " (330mm) (240mm) (370mm ) (265mm ) CPH 920 22 .0" 9 .5 " 14.5" 10.5 • (560mm) (240mm) [370mm ) [265mm ) CPH 1022 24.0 " 10.75 " 14.5" 10 .5" {6 10mm) [275mm) [370mm ) [265mm ) Note: Dimens ions in inches (mm) C D _li I~~ "" CPH CHALLENGER SERIES PEDESTALS CPH911, CPH920, CPH1022 ~ 8 CPH 911 C DH 1022 4 UR 23.09 Mediacom – June 5, 2023 1. Citizen Communication & Notification • Provide Door Hangers at preconstruction meetings which shall be approved prior to distribution and work. • Use of portable A-frame style signage at the entrance and exit of work sites. • Applicant shall dedicate a Point of Contact to answer citizens questions. 2. Permitting, Locating & Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A phasing plan must be submitted with the permit to alleviate confusion for locating. • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. 3. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). 5 UR 23.09 Mediacom – June 5, 2023 4. Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. 5. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. • 6. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, & As Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency. 6 UR 23.09 Mediacom – June 5, 2023 7.Staff Recommendation •The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. •This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: i.City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands. ii.City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas. iii.City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398). iv.Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (#1754) v.City of Fairhope Tree and Landscape Ordinance (#1444) •Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions of UR 23.09 1 UR 23.10 AT&T – July 6, 2023 ' UR 23 .10 City of Fairhope Plan n ing Comm ission July 6, 2023 AT&T Live Oak Estates Lege nd llAY •CADOWS- •""-<---Uno --□--o--.- -----"-10 ·---- J I a w--..-.~......, .... ,..~--.,.,.a_,.. I{ ~•1141oe,11,w t ----•~L.14 -I Ji Project Nome: AT&T Li ve Oak Estat es Site Dato: 6,863 Li nea r Footag e Proj ect Type: Fi ber Insta ll a ti on Jurisdiction: Fairhope Plann ing Juris dicti on Zoninq District: PUD PPIN Number: N/A General Location: Sou thwest i nterse ct ion of Bay Meadows Ave an d St a t e Highway 18 1 Surveyor of Record: AT&T Engineer of Record: AT&T owner I Developer: AT&T School District: Fai rh o p e E.lementary School Fai rhope M idd le an d Hig h School s Recommendation : Approve d w/ Con diti ons ~!.eared by: Chris Am bron " \\"@B E s j i • ~ 2 UR 23.10 AT&T – July 6, 2023 Summary of Request: Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 6,863 linear feet of buried fiber along routes outlined on the below location map. I NOT TO SCALEI NOTE: SOM E IROAO S OM ITTE D FOR CLAR:ITY ( I / f lJl~OI\ L E ST L W I > I I LL r ---------------------------------------1~ 1 SP LIT B::;i AI\C H VE I _1 I l 7 lw l '-1 1Z I ~ IW I C! _J I O 1 0 i '.Il I 1 H ·.RDWOOJ l ..V E 1 L _______________________________________ J I I -------------------------------------1 It- i (/] I W I ~ 10 I fY ,ac CONS im ~II □N N □IE S GO L D Et\ LE F VE I i .--Ali -CIJ NITR,ACT OIRS IMLJS T HAV E A COPY OF THE RI GHT OF WAY P ERMIT WI TH THE M AT AL L TI MES, POS TEID ON SI TE ,, OR I IN WI DOW OF VEHI C LE. 2 . DI STURB E I□ AR E AS SHALL BE CO VE RE □ AT THE E D OF EAC H DAY 3. DI STURBED AR E A,S SHALL BE SOU D SODDED WITHI N 1 10 DAY S OF CIJ MPLETI ONI 3 UR 23.10 AT&T – July 6, 2023 1. Citizen Communication & Notification • Provide Door Hangers at preconstruction meetings which shall be approved prior to distribution and work. • Use of portable A-frame style signage at the entrance and exit of work sites. • Applicant shall dedicate a Point of Contact to answer citizens questions. 2. Permitting, Locating & Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A phasing plan must be submitted with the permit to alleviate confusion for locating. • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. 3. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary for potholes, please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). 4 UR 23.10 AT&T – July 6, 2023 4. Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist before proceeding with earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. 5. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. • 6. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, & As Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency. 5 UR 23.10 AT&T – July 6, 2023 7.Staff Recommendation •The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. •This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: i.City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands. ii.City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas. iii.City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398). iv.Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754) v.City of Fairhope Tree and Landscape Ordinance (#1444) •Staff Recommendation: Approval of UR 23.10 1 UR 23.11 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 City of Fairhope Planning Commission July 6, 2023 UR 23.11 Mediacom Riverhorse Project Name: Medi acom Ri verh orse Site Data: 3,369 Li ne ar Foota.Re Project Type: Co ax ial Cabl e I nst allatio n urisdiction: Fai rh ope Pl anni ng Juri sd icti on Zonina District: R·2 PPIN Number: N/A General LDc.ation: East of Blueberry Lan e & North of North stat i on Subdi vsion , Cal ibre Street surveyor of Record: Medi acom Engineer of Record: Medi acom OWner I Developer. Medi acom Schoa/ District: Fai rh ope Elementary Sch ool Fairhope Mi ddl e and Hi g h Sch ool s Recommendation : A ooroved w/ Con di t i on s f!:!pared by : -Ch ri s Ambron ugena a '--"----□-Cl°""'"'-~ ---... , . ._ __ , .. __ •IW•--n,,.,q~ ..... -- CA!l'l'OII DII 2 UR 23.11 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 Summary of Request: Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 3,369 linear feet of coaxial cable along routes outlined on the below location map. LOC',l ,TI ON MA P RIVE HORS E SIJ:} IVIS ION Pl-4 /. t s, c1>,U SI< -p .3 I t I I ) -1\EW \~E Jlic,l U 1 11 er 0 z 0 >-z <( u CR-30/GAYFE R RD EXT ( CY D z 2 - <( 1-- ti) z /'-~ I // :/l w c:: CD :, <( u -------✓ / / '--------- t\ E'N ~,I EC l,l /' n lvl 1 IJ['Ef:,f'R:-l,\lfl / I I l I T OTALS TR ENCH BOR E 3 ,223' 0 -B ORE 146 ' PEDESTALS 15 STRAND P H 1 OVERLAS H W RE CKOUT MEDIAC O M PROPOS ED N EW LNDER ROUN D CO A XIAL C AB LE IN TH E RIVERHORS E StJ DI VI SION AN D CROSS I G THE FAIR HOP E RIGHT OF WAY. u.,;~n.,:SCOTT MILLE ', CA LE EAST I NC . 3 UR 23.11 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 1. Citizen Communication & Notification • Provide Door Hangers at preconstruction meetings which shall be approved prior to distribution and work. • Use of portable A-frame style signage at the entrance and exit of work sites. • Applicant shall dedicate a Point of Contact to answer citizens questions. 2. Permitting, Locating & Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A phasing plan must be submitted with the permit to alleviate confusion for locating. • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. 3. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). 4 UR 23.11 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 4. Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. 5. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. • 6. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, & As Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency. 5 UR 23.11 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 7.Staff Recommendation •The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. •This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: i.City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands. ii.City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas. iii.City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398). iv.Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754) v.City of Fairhope Tree and Landscape Ordinance (#1444) •Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions of UR 23.11 1 UR 23.12 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 City of Fairhope Planning Commission July 6, 2023 UR 23.12 Mediacom Trentino Project Name: Med i acom Trenti no Site Data: 4 ,4Qc; I i nPr1 r F(\()t:le,P Project Type: Coax i al Ca bl e I n st allat ion Jurisdiction: Fai rhope Planni ng Jurisd icti on Zoning District: PUD PPIN Number: N/A General Location: North of Parke r Ro ad, W e st o f U.S. Hi gh wav98 Surveyor of Record: "-"edi aco m Engineer of Record: Med i acom owner/ Developer: t-Aed i acom School District: Fai rhope El e mentary Sch ool Fai rh ope Middl e an d Hi gh Sch ool s Recommendation: App rove d w/ Condit ions Pre1>ared by: Ch ris Ambro n Legena •"'-"'----□-g cw,,o, .. u. ---1"1·----•""'·-•----·-~O·-•-~ 11>1 -i..-......., ...... -- 2 UR 23.12 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 Summary of Request: Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 4,495 linear feet of coaxial cable along routes outlined on the below location map. L -Tl ' -- T ~E JT I - ,T TOT A LS -; ,J r-i t·J rt, l fl H 1 ,.., ,.· _._, -=- TRENCH BORE D-BORE 4 ,495' ..,. p EDEST ALS 27 ·~ ~ STRAN D ..,. > --p, ,n OVERt.ASH ~ ~ w RECKOUT 1°11 5 MED IACOM "ROPOSE IJ ~E I ~PE•,C.R OIJN I! "0 XI L S:.A~LE IN THE Tl<ENT l~Q S.U ~P IVl'.'.l(''-1 M' C~OSS INC THE F fl ,HDrE <I GHT :r w;,•. BA LDWIN C::LN JV v.,;9'"'" So • OTT WILLE R L,~PLE E~.S T INf.. ·1 ,n1r: !\Sn -74!:l-1,.'51 3 UR 23.12 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 1. Citizen Communication & Notification • Provide Door Hangers at preconstruction meetings which shall be approved prior to distribution and work. • Use of portable A-frame style signage at the entrance and exit of work sites. • Applicant shall dedicate a Point of Contact to answer citizens questions. 2. Permitting, Locating & Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A phasing plan must be submitted with the permit to alleviate confusion for locating. • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. 3. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). 4 UR 23.12 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 4. Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. 5. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. • 6. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, & As Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency. 5 UR 23.12 Mediacom – July 6, 2023 7.Staff Recommendation •The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. •This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: i.City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands. ii.City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas. iii.City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398). iv.Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754) v.City of Fairhope Tree and Landscape Ordinance (#1444) •Staff Recommendation: Approval with Conditions of UR 23.12 TWIN BEECH RD LAKEVIEWCT COUNTY RD 13FAIRFIELD DRSEDGEFIELD AVE THOMPSON HALLRDBAYLES STBARNDLINGSTLAMBTON STSURTEES STTHEAKSTON STCity of FairhopePlanning Commission July 6, 2023 ¯BAYLESSTLAMBTONSTBARNDLINGST TWIN BEECH RD SD 23.18 - Longbranch Legend Roads Parcels Corporate Limits Zoning Classification R-1 - Low Density Single-Family R-2 - Medium Density Single-Family R-3 - High Density Single-Family Planning Jurisdiction ^ Project Name: LongbranchSite Data: 18.71 acresProject Type: Final Plat ApprovalJurisdiction: Fairhope Planning JurisdictionZoning District: R-2PPIN Number: 77788General Location: Between County Road 13 and Thompson Hall Road, North side of Twin Beech Rd Surveyor of Record: DewberryEngineer of Record: DewberryOwner / Developer: FST and Dilworth development IncSchool District: Fairhope Elementary School Fairhope Middle and High Schools Recommendation: Prepared by: µ µ Approve with Conditions Mike Jeffries Page 5 of 10 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL Application Typ e: D Village Subdivision D Preliminary Plat D Minor Subdivision D Infonnal (No Fee) 181 Final Plat D Multiple Occupancy Project Attachments: D Articles oflncorporation or List all associated investors Date of Application: _ .... 51~23=1~20~2-3-___ _ Property Owner / Leaseholder Information Name of Property Owner: F?T and Dilworth Deve lopment.~hone Number: 334 .707.2106 Address of Property Owner: 2124 Moores Mill Rd Cit : Auburn State: AL Zi : 36830 ProP,osed Subdivision Name: Longbranch No. Acres in Plat: _1_8_.11 _________ No. Lots/Units: _2_a ______ _ Parcel No: 05-46-05-22-0-000-001 .578 Current Zoning: _R_:i _______ _ Authorized Agent Information Plat must be signed by the property owner before acceptance by the City of Fairhope Name of Authorized Agent: _Dewberry hone Number: 251 .929 .9783 .Address: 25353 Friendship Rd City: Daphne __________ State: AL Zip: _3_65_2_6 __ _ Contact Person: Justin Britt , Al Finley, or Emily Phillips Surveyor /Engineer Information Name of Firm: _same as agent Phone Number: _251 .929.9803 Address: Same as agent City: ___________ State: _____ Zip: Contact Person: Victor L. Germain Plat Fee Calculation: Reference: Ordinance 1269 Signatures: I certify that I am the property owner /leaseholder of the abo~~ribed property and hereby submit this plat to the City for review . *If property is owned by Frurhop~gle Tax Corp . an autho-~ Single Tax repcesentative shall sign this~ ~ W\((,\A et-e,\ dlfJov\-¼/~\ly'jov , 0-<Af~-~ ~ ) Property Owner/Leaseholder Printed Name Signature 05/23/2023 Date Fairhope Single Tax Corp . (If Applicable) 1 SD 23.18 Longbranch – July 6, 2023 Summary of Request: The owner is FST and Dilworth Development, Inc. The engineer and applicant is Dewberry Engineers. This application is for a 28-lot subdivision located on the north side of Twin Beech Rd., between County Road 13 and Thompson Hall Rd. The subject property is zoned R-2 in the City of Fairhope municipal limits. Preliminary approval case SD 21.27 May 2021. A 12-month extension was granted at the January 5, 2023 Planning Commission meeting. Excerpts of the site data table is included below: Comments: - Baldwin EMC, the electrical provider, will not provide power until after Final Plat. o Aerator will be connected after Final Plat. - A mulch nature trail has been provided throughout the common areas as shown on the landscape plans. Additionally, the applicant has provided a detail of the trail and maintenance plan for these trails which has been included in the Operations and Maintenance plan that will be recorded. - The site is 90% vegetated. Additional mulch and seed have been spread out in the few areas that had been washed out. - Invoices provided for: o Streetlights o Aerator - The connection to Barndling St. was made and the temporary turnaround easement extinguished per note on Slide-2260F Sedgefield Subdivision Phase One. - Landscaping: Due to grading conflicts trees originally shown to be saved were removed. Punch List: - Aerators invoice was submitted and will be installed. After final plat it will be connected once Baldwin EMC provides power. SITE DATA : Z ONING: R-2 LI N. FT. OF ST REET S: 1,824 LF NUMBER OF LO TS: 28 MINI MUM LOT SIZ E: 10 ,500 SF SMA LLE ST LOT: 12 ,195 SF (LOT 13) LARG EST LO T: 15,027 SF (LOT 1 6) COMM ON AREA: 8 .2 1 AC [Gr eenspa c e = 4 .8 5 AC (26 %)] TO TA L AR EA: 18. 71 ACR ES REQU IRED SETBACKS FRON T -35 FEET REAR -35 FE ET SI DE -10 FEE T SIDE STRE ET -20 FEET UT ILITIE S WA TER SERV ICE: CIT Y OF FA I RHOPE SEWER SERV ICE: CIT Y OF FAI RHOPE GAS SERV ICE: CITY OF FAIRHOPE ELECTR IC SERV ICE: BA LDWIN EM C TE LE PHONE SERV ICE: AT &T 2 SD 23.18 Longbranch – July 6, 2023 The City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations contain the following criteria in Article V.B.2. Approval Standards. “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Meets b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Meets c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Follow‐Up Activities Required by Staff and the Applicant: • Copy of the recorded plat • Copy of the recorded O&M Agreement • Maintenance and Guaranty (M&G) Agreement executed by the developer – this document is not considered fully executed until the Mayor signs said agreement. o Remember to include the instrument # from the recorded plat o Please include 30 days in paragraph 3 Recommendation: Staff recommends Conditional Approval of SD 23.18 Longbranch final plat with the following condition: 1. Install aerator. 2. Complete follow up activities listed above. 25' VICINITY MAP /"= I MILE SURVEYOR'S CERT/FICA TE: &~G 16 PCR"ON ()( f'Hf SOUn-MU11)1,J(-t)UARlfll Of S(Cnl1N 22. 1'0MISHJ 6 S()(Jlh, fiANQ' ., usr. BAtD 'J ca)NTf. ALAB~IJA SlllrJC ,;(JR£ 11/.l{UCtJtA"'t. 'f oc;c.rr.·!J!J) AS FotLC' C()'1,;f;ffe£ ,1 THE SOUTM I Cf><WR Of SEt110N n. ,o_ 6 SOI./IH, .. ff/if 1 [A<;r; s• Sit"'•!~, M£P!D!~~-/1/fflC[ /IW ;()(m, 59'<9';'~. L~Sf. ~'°"'' ~IL ;oun, ~•~l:lli Qf ;,,i, S[CflDN ,1 JI l,'ISrANl;£ or 67~.88 Ffl1 fO ill P{)lnfj fH[,VCf NUW NORTH 00';16'J{)" f.A~T, A DIStM,a tY 40.~ nrr f() A t INC/I OP{N ~ F'IJlt ON rHr /t/OPIH W,111-(JI-WAr (/NE fY 9AU)M'~ CCVNTY ~Glf'N,r NO ~, FOR rnc Pl;,,,VT Of BC~ OI ffff.. PROP!RrY ni.PO~ DESCRIBED; THENCE cONnNUE NORTH 00"28'Jo· EAST, A DISTANCE OF T290.08 F££T TO A ,;2· REBAR ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SEDGEFIELD SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO A PlA T RECORDED ON SLID£ NO. 2260-F OF TH£ PROBATE COURT RECORDS OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'45'09" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY UN£ OF SEDCEFIElD SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 6Jl.40 FEET TO A 5/8" CAPPED REBAR (CAl109LS}; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'24'59" 11£ST, A DISTANCE OF 1289.29 FEET TO A 1/2" CAPPED REBAR (CA0092LS) ON mE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BALO'it1N COUNTY HIGHWAY NO. H; mENCf RUN NOR1H 89°49'25" wrsr. ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY UN£ A DISTANCE OF 632.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LANDS Sl'fllATE, LYING, AND BEING IN BALDWIN COUNTY. ALABAMA AND CONTAINING 815,154 SQUARE F££T (18. 71 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. (THIS O[SCRIPTTON WAS COMPOSED FROM R.P.BK. 378, PG. 621 OF PROBA 1[ R[COROS ANO AN ACTUAL FIELD SUR~r). I H{Rl.1lr c,"nFr rnM 1111 PARTS r,f' rHJS SJJNVF:r ftNO O AlliNG HA>F HC!N COOPf.((£0 ~y ACcoPOMiCC. ,.,,,_.. 'iH[ CIJRli'(I{'; irCOtllRCAICNfS Ot mt: s,~NIJ.4ROS Of ~AC1lCE FOR SIJR\£Y1"1G rN rr1c sr>.fc f)F ALABAIIA ro 7H[ 8£51 ()F' ltl'f KNDY.tEDCE IN,-ORl,,fA11(JN AND BFL'f.F ·~ '1-'-P.BA,lj"I' Ol'.WlrnR• = --w:,OR, Cl.HAIA1,'f !!.L ? * "::o.l847J *} ....-:: LNl)~- SV!NH '¥UT VAL.ID iff11•0VT ORIQN!,t SICNAJUiJI A/lb S[llt '°'l"o ;.,oyt-tO: ~~ ~ L. G'i:.~ SURVfl'OR'S NOTES: ' .ctL ,,lt_ASur?(.t,1[.NI$ "f[ -'~Dt. 1/rl •Cl:CJl,t(l"-hc.E. ..,,,... u.{ S'J',1ND,ARb,S 2 fhE.Hf WAY BC ltl.COlllJtO IJli IJNRCCOIIIJlD DU:OS.. U.S.WENrs. ;n(;H,S.-f]I-MY, OP o:kf}I 'NSffftWt~f'S l+MIC'II Couto t,;,-rt,r '""" BOUH!Ji'l'tll"S (1f,f (J$£ Of fk£ SUl!i~CI PIIOPCR'.,.. J ~, WA5 NO ATTTAJrlr ro Drtf.RUIH( D;[ C.Kl~TfNC(.", I..DC.i.11/)IJ, \)fir c:;1(N1 f1F Md SUB-SUfffAC:C rT .. MlJ~[S, " ™i HN['S R{PR(Sr,,{111tc rHr Cf.>UflltHK N'l(J ,v.,,.,,-., OF ~r V TM£ S-;11fETS A.Rf' 'SXOMI f(Jli' llfSLAL l"UlfPUSCl CWH AND llf"Ri NOf SWhftfO ill,tt.~ ,:O,t OF W,'1 r- ,-,ONtNt:.Y'rf,flOI¥ ~ ""'-SO S,.,Ull"IY 5 5')R,£.,' .... i °"'oocrro (W JA#NJAR ► HD(. ;DUJ;. AND 1S R(cr,,;tll) ~ m.D l/OOIC /JI&. J.f PA.a J ANO IN AN ELECTRONIC DA rA FIL.£. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVf.Y WAS CONOUCTE.D ON N0Vf.M8ER 261N. 2018; ANO IS R[CORDED IN FIELD BOOK /J21, AT PAGE 42 ANO FIELD BOOK J22, Ar PACE. 20 ANO IN AN ElECTTWNIC OA TA FILE. 6. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHO'M-1 HEREON WE.RE "COMPUTED" FROM ACTUAL FIELD TRA'-£RS£S. l. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO STA Tf PLANE GRID COORDINA T"ES. ALABAMA 'M:ST ZONE 01oz. NAO BJ. TH£ BA SIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS TH£ SOUTH t/NE OF SECT10N 22 AS 8£/NG sag·49•2s~E ~ N89'49'25~W 8. ALL GPS OBSERVA nONS 'M:RE TAKEN USING REAL nME KINEMA nc GPS. 9. THIS SLJRVCY IS BASED UPON MONUM£NTAT10N FOUND IN PLACE ANO DOES NOT PURPORT TO 8£ A RETrlACEMENT AND PROPORTT()NING OF THE ORIGJNAL GOVERNMENT SURVEY. CURVE Cl C2 C3 C4 cs C6 C7 CB C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C18 RADIUS 20 .00 ' 20.00' 20.00' 224.93' 20.00 · 20 .00 · 20.00· 20.00· 525.00' 525.00' 475.00' 500.00 ' 20.0D' 249.93' SIT[ DATA: ZON ING: R-2 ARC 95.00' 3 1.42' 31.42 ' 24.71' 29.22' 31.4 2' 31.42 ' 31.42' 27.66' 10.15' 43.57' 40.68 ' 31.33' 27.45' CHORD 28.34 ' 28.28 ' 28.28 ' 24.70' 26.69 ' 28.28 ' 28.28 ' 28.28' 27.65' 10.15' 43.56' 40.67' 28.22 ' 27.44' LIN. FT . OF STREETS: 1,824 LF NUMBER OF LOTS: 28 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 10,500 SF CHORD BEAR ING N44' 35'01 "W N45'24'59"E 544·35 ·01 "E N10'16'57"E N09'20'17"E S09'02 '29 "W N45' 17 '47"E NOY33'4B"E SMAL LEST LOT: 12,195 SF (LO T 13) LARGE ST LOT: 15,027 SF (LOT 16) COMMON AREA: 8 .21 AC [Green spo ce = TOTAL AREA: 18.71 ACRE S 4 .85 AC (2 6¾}] REQ UIRED SETBACKS FRONT -35 FEET REAR -35 FEET SIDE -10 FEET SIDE STR EE T -20 ..!.i.Il!.!fil. FE ET so· SCALE: 1" ~ 50' WA TER SERV ICE: CITY OF FAIRHOPE SEWER SER VICE: CITY OF FA IRHOP E GAS SERV ICE : CITY OF FAI RHOP E ELE CTRIC SERV ICE: BA LDW IN EMC TE LEPHONE SERV ICE: AT&T BAl/8111111fffNCCI.''----L-- W:STrTPRa'fJITYL'IE CERllFICA/f OF APPROVAL BY THE FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION 1HIS Pl.ll Ho\$ ll[[N SIJBl,llntO TO AND CONSIDERCO BT lH£ CT'f fl'I..ANNJ,IC COMt.lSSION CF FAIRHCP£, ,_t..aMIA.. NCI•[ Alll"'lfJC a, SIO< ~ ., """""'==,,------""-·11•------- GENERAL NO TES: I 1'-4£"£ 15 M.DICATl~ ~rfi{ iUt J. ,~ f'OOI !JMlltY (.4~1 CM ...U. U)t ~IME'l •-.G :u,wo,; ,'fl'U,S AD,1AtUolf r0 lMl; IIIGM1'5-cie--w,.,. ,~ t.A:> Wt:-,_ AU, "'1Mlt lDI l~ ANO ,t, 1~ ta:::ll un/ fA w, ?<. ACrl g;;;x C, \OT j ,11£,5., ,t,S Dn-("l1.ill>S( -.0'1.0 l. n,,c~ 15 0f;DIC4nO t(ll:tWll'M J, 10' tllEI ,..;[S[!tV,\DQft t,f,S{~I ~ n;r A.If Qt-l.01$-'tH"ft. U .I.NO .\ 10· ;'"oft( l'"llt~._,.nc,. fA§f;li>-i.T ,. ;t. 1'-it ,.~~ I OJ' lOl 1• AS !t<D,... H~ llilO r1f(U: !it1AU H("l'l~D ff>OV l<l!'n-tth s-c 1"H µlfBC!ltJAT10lf E.M[M(hl u~u:ss AHl~DYt:O a, ni( or, 3-r111PMD'>r. J ,\~ 5T11'1ll!li fl! 1,tl,Jl'-0:IIIT P"OPf'Hn n-lAT !\RI: Not li=TFD 1'J l~ n11l ~ ™L IYf>AD"-f.ti'tNt-. ":t-!"1.l If' -osTt.O ~™ .. S'1U' !!lc;N IN,ANI( il!CA!JIHC--,u,UfCt TI-IIHJUCH mru.r SON YI.till II( POSTtO f1V ,iJIO'IIOCJr ~ .t.>,1,. ii'IIL-wl ~ll'lfi ,C'"-Ok s,,,-.. ~AW. A :IO ,,,M ! M CM.t .4Wkr£D USt5 u-lW[. iUi£I.Jltl aurrot S>,"l.J.. 1£. Pr" rRt cm (II rMHOtf 1'AC)!W,lak RCCU~Anofls N'ITIQ..C " Sltl!Clto F ..t Jl"lt[Afll B i l't<F"~ l'i DfO•C.•lln H::"("""llllffl-l A ~!~,.CC/ufll.lTY r1o'Sf"Wf'tl 0...,, rl-if flt11P[T'r CJ# ,.... "'"°"' ~--,.., ~ l"Fl!':Qf4 ,... LEG£NO: 0 -C•IJP!D W!:.BA/:' '°"-NO -lflDM ~OU~D = Ol'r~ °'(J PtPf rOt.JND ... !J/'d,. CAF1PC.D 1/EtJJt,; 50 (CA1109/..S) en, 181 tJIIW,R' rrr ,RGN r04JfflJ ' ,. (YNtf• L (IJ) • i.llAS(Jlot/J Bafhlf:! '-"-IJ tll1ANC£ (R) .-Rf'tX)R(J 0f£C (lfliRWG A~·D Dl'STM'C£ 1i'P8tf • 'J!Al PROPCRrr BOOK ,,. DAG£ f NIJMOEN ♦ -FCNCi. POST " illlRB MR€" f"CNCC • lfli'000f[NCC .-BllttDtHC: SCTSA S'8.9',r;;".1IT 100· SURVEYOR /ENGINEER · DEWBERRY 25353 FRIENDSHIP ROAD, DAPHNE, Al 35526 VICTOR L. GERMAIN, PLS UC. NO. 38473 JASON ESTES, PE UC. NO. 2271 4 -SEDGEFIELD SUBOIVfSION SLIDE 22 60 -F 1 100.00· I PROPOSED POND JO• AC DEVELO PER /OWN ER : FST OIL WORTH OEV[LOPMENT, INC. 2124 MOORES MILL ROAD, SUITE /JOA AUBURN, AL 36830 1~• DIM!VAG(' [.ASCl<[Nr 'flO 00 ----"91).0Q'-- g N ., 8 g " "' N ., 21 1:nmsr 014 .-.-:. ! '~''· -89..ll • Nag·35•01·w·- 15000' ----·-i 1 F,F,L • 19."l l.-N89·s5'(ii"•w ___ 150.00' 23 llJOO ST .,. "' 150.00' • -N 9·3~·01"\~ ! ! 25 11JOG Y rt~,., l , ,.c. • a•J 1'.:0._Q9~ r··-• 26 j '~ff 1 F.F.C. • ~JIJ L-$89•,3~•01•[ ' I 150 ()()' 27 17,00 ST Clnt AC I ;,, ; rS'L • 84.SJ 8 N "' 'g .-. ., g °' ., 'o 0 "' "' '.:R 539·35'01"( ~._-----==1s-=.o;:;.o..:9c.:-=c_ ___ _. ;'fl,.,~ ! .~~ ! ~ o_,e1,t; I I F,,.,l. • 111 .◄8 j •-· S89'35'01 'E I 15000' COMMON AREA 2 4.00 AC ' ' ' \ \ ---.. - 0 0 .. ., 8 "' ., fST 9'!'MI, MA"THl..[EN 0 ETAL REIO. JAN(T L 37, BAR~OLNO Sl LOT 31 F•1~:Cro""ii-~~32 r,o· TREE PRESERVA nON EASEMENT j ,,,.. O!S (CAll(}flts} I , I ' 14-4 .12' ,-------- ' ' I ! 13 12115 11" 01d ~C ,.f.£, • VJ.JJ N89;-35'01'"W -- •~2 .00· i 12 1 •z•a. v 1 I 01, A< : : r .f .f_ • u_gj I ---N89\:fS°Ol;rW ---J r------152.00' -----, ' ' : I I 11 I l~-t6,t 1iF I on .. .: i r.r.t ..... » N89"J!i'Of"W •• 152.00' r------· 10 1;1•£•S1 Q~ >.C ,.,.~ -,~.., ~ ---N69=j'5'0Pw I I N89'Js,ww---.. 152-00' -·-1 4 I I i j t3•64 !7 ..,. •< ,.,.l. -B&t.S I r.r.L .... ., I '---N89"S~Oi"W 152 .00' _ ·-· 2 11-.64 sr .,. At: ,-,r.L • 8Q..l.S 1 12•64 SF OJ9AC ,.,.E. -7&.lJ ' I 8 I C DI I I 8 I :;j I I I 1 'o I o I :;j I I I I 1g I ,.. "' I I I ~ f--:-W I 8 .. I "' I I I I I I 'g I I I ~ I l;j I 1 I I I g I ~ I I I I I 'o I o t ~ I l/7"CIIP""(r;.JJZ1f1t.1J 21 22 r ,'- N00'28'JO"E t 40.00· M -----i +-------~-- r BALDWIN COUNTY HIGHWAY NO. 44 1189 ·,9 •25 ·w 5J2.12· (M) '"\._ souTH ,o· OF RPBK J"\\ A.K.A. TWINBEECHRD. ---PAGC-62-1 FOR_RI_GHT--OF-~WAY- (BO"PUBLJCRIG/fT.OF-WAY] PK NM rOt.H?K_ S89"49 '25~£ 679.86' (M) -------------St9VJ'15"£ 6J2..16'{11) -J.·if,.i~T-t.11.f(~,- 28 I 2 ~ N89'5J'JO~E 680.CXY (R) POINT OF COMMENCE/JENT THC "L OCALLY .4CCEPTf0" SOVTHWCSr CORNCR OF S£CTIOt<i""22. TOWNSHIP 6 YJUIH, RANCC2 t.A.)t, 8AL0flrfN COUNrY. ALABA MA. CfRllFICATE or APPROVAL BY BALDWIN EMC. (ELECTRIC} n£ IJNl)(R9Q,IED. 4S MJfHOAIZEO BY BAI..D'tllN EMC HEREBY Af>'l'flO'IES M .,,mtN PUl fOR Tl£ ~c or SAME IN lMC PROB.lTC Ofl'lCC or BALD'MN COJNTY. ALt,SA,IU,. MS -O.t.Y OT ~----"- AuTHORiZED IIEPRC'SEN TA Tl YE CERTIFICATE or APPROVAL BY AT&T:(TELEPHONE) THE UMD(lt9GNED. ,lS MJTHOlttZCD Bl' o\Tol<f HOIEIIY fJ>PftO"ES 1M( •MN Pt.Al R)II' lH[ R[CORDIHC or $.Ml[ IN TI1E P!t08ATE CfflC( OT flAI..D'MW COJNfY, "L"8Nil"-lHS _ 0.lY Of -----"- CERTIFICATE or APPROVAL BY CITY or FAIRHOPE UTILITIES {WATER & SEWER): TH[ UND[RSIQ,l[D, ,lS, MJ1l10All[D BY THE an OT fAIAH(P[ UTIUTIES HE.REBT APPRO'o'D TH[ WTHIN F'l,,,\T rOA Tl-<[ RECORDING (:F SAME IN TH[ F'ffOBATE 0fTICE or B~WIH COUNT'!' . ..u.BAMA, rn 1s ---DAT (:F -----20 __ _ CERf/FICA If OF APPROVAL BY CITY OF FAIRHOPf Uf/LJTIES (GAS}. '!It£~.•~ .UtlO'llltl) n~ Ol'I' o,:-r..-.cpr t.mlJTD-€11Df ~ 11< ~ ~r:;:r ~ Of Sol)I[ lt',J~.A1t ~ Cf II~~ COJNTY. ,uw,y~ o.u1'0llll!l M."llt"SO.T•f"l\>C FSTl,UXlllC,AICHI.ROWtl.tJ.1,1()()11[.EUv.et I 11150 nw.l BEEQ-IAO,\D FA~OPE .tJ. ~~32 UNZONEO CERTIFICATE or LEASEHOLD OWNERSHIP SGtJIH tlA~ or sttUI 12 IIE, 1HE: ~--======-4S PACf'AETOlt(S). HAloE Cl.USED lHC LANO OlBRI.CEO IN THE WINN PLAT 10 IIIE 51JAIIE'l'EO. LAID our A.NO l'I..ATTID TO BE IOIO...,. AS LI'.lNGMNIOi SU~. II~ COUNT't'. "'-"8""'"- ANCI THAT Tl-£ Slll:EHS olNO [AS(IIID,ITS. AS SHO'IIN ON SAIO l'I..AT. Alt[ H[A[flT D[DIC"1ED TO THC use rF nu: PU8UC. DATED TH S __ DAY OF~----20 __ ta.WORTH D[',<Q.OPt,ICNl, INC ""-------- ASITS· ______ _ CERT/FICA T[ or NOTARY PUBLIC: STA TE or AL.f.BAMA COUNTY a' BALD'MN '•-----~ NOTARY PUBLIC IN -'NO FOR SAJO COUNTY. IN SAID STAT[, HEREBY CERTTY Tl-V,T ------- 'M--!DSE NAME AS ----o-""~E~R o'f THE LANDS PLATTED HEREON IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, .lND WHO IS KNO~ TO ME. ACl<NOWlEOGED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY THAl. BONG INFORMEO OF THE CO.i!HT U ~OjT AMD •S SI.Jot L.£ASE:H<X.O OIIINER ANO lill'rn F\il .lUntQA:ITY_ [JC[Q,l[]) n+E SAME VQ..UNTARILY. UY ot.U.0 IMO QJYICIAi. SEAL THE __ O>Y NDl"-'tY -..ieuc MY COUMISSION ExPIRES W;\NATHAN\501087l8-lO NG8RANCH\PI.ANNING\501<-0-197 FI NALd"'.l 6/27/1023 10 27:48 AM C[RTIF/CA Tf or OWN[RSHIP .... rAIJtttCPl. WtCU: f")t ~Anoa.. AA ALA!Alil.A. CQl!loCR,Ul()lr4. NUlatY sun. ""'' tllt \RE THE ~ca, Of "4l U."'°"' Ot.~ 14Ult!ON AMO 00 ~'f M ff: AU 110 , ~1RU.r\,. ALLEYWAYS ANO EASEMENT'S SHOWN ON THIS PLAT TO THE PUB UC WE. ~----.-o ______ WrlOSE NA MES AS PRESIDENT AND S(~TAA,. HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO 8E SURVEYED AND SUBD IVIDED ..-.s INOICA TED HEREON, fOR TH E uses ... ND PURPOSES HERE(N SET FORTH AND DO HERfBY .lCl<NOWLEOCE AND ADOPT THE SA ME UNDER THC 0[S(ik "-"'D TlllE HER[ON INDICA TEO OAITD TlltS THE ____ DAY Of ______ _ FAIRHOPE SINGI....E TAK CORPORAllON. AN ALABAMA CORPORATION CERTIFICATE or NOTARY PUBLIC: STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY or BAUlWIN ~TH;.>T.-:=====:....':'"O'.':TAR::_:Y PU:su~~~=:.~~-·~'-"""-1'(~· _™_"~D-S1_•1E~·~l£-R=EB-Y ~ SECR(T.t..RY. OF FAIRHOPE SINCL.£ TAX CORPORATION, AN ALABAMA CORPOfU,TlON, AS O'M-IER Of mE LANDS PLATTEO HEREON IS SIGNED TO 11,E FOREGOING INSmUMENT, AND WrlO ARE KNOWN TO till: ACKNO'M..EOCEO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY THAT, BEING IN rORMED Of TH E CONTENT OF TH E INSTIIOUtHt. ANO IN lHEIA CAPACITY AS SUCH OWNER ANO WITH F\JLL AUTHOfflTY, EXECUlEO THE SAME \IOLIJ14fAMU l GIVEN UNOER MY HANO ANO OfnQAL SEAL n-£ __ DAY "'----------- NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION D:PIRES ENG LON GB RANCH SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT JUNE Tl, 2023 -SHEET I Of I PLAT OF SUBDMSION D.E.D . l □RAWN A.E .F. J.N.E. !SURVEYOR V.LC. U Dewbeny ,sm •-"°"" llllphoO, AL36S•• 1.s1.'90.9'So fax.l5t.919"981s CllKD, V.L.C. PROJ MGR J.N.E. SCALE 1 "•:,0' PRO,J NO .50140497 flLE 501~0497FINAI. SHEET 1 OF I TREE PRESERVA11ON CRED I TS -Sec. 20 5-4(m) Tal a t Trees To Be Preserved: Tota l Tree Credits Earned: Tota l Tree Credits U se d : 53 Trees 209Credits 12Credits Ofill .G.EN.U..S. s.e.E.CI.ES. COMMON NAME .GIY CBEDJTS PEA TREE TOTA i CR EDI TS 22" Carya i llinoinensis Slash Pine 2 22" Carya i lli noinensis 24" Carya i llinoinensis 26" Carya i llinoinensis 36" Quercus cerris 22" Quercus ni gra 24" Quercus ni gra 24" Quercus nigra 25" Quercus ni gra 22" Quercus virginiana 22" Quercus virginiana 22" Qu e rcus vi rg iniana 22" Quercus virginiana 22" Quercus virginiana 23" Quercus virginiana 24" Quercus virginiana 24" Quercus virginiana 24" Quercus virginiana 25" Quercus virginiana 26" Quercus virginiana 26'' Quercus virginiana 26" Q1,1erctJs virginiana 27" Quercus virginiana 27" Quercus virginiana 28" Quercus virginiana 28" Quercus virginiana 29" Quercus virginiana 30" Quercus virginiana 30" Quercus virginiana 32" Quercus virginiana 32" Quercus virg in ia na 32" Quercus virgin1ana 33" Quercus virg in iana 33" Quercus virginiana 34" Quercus virginiana 34" Quercus virginiana 34" Quercus virginiana 36" Quercus virg inia na 36" Quercus virginiana 38" Quercus virginiana 46" Quercus virginiana 47" Quercus virginiana 48" Quercus virginiana 48" Quercus virginiana 48" Quercus virginiana 48" Quercus virginiana 50" Quercus virginiana 52" Quercus virginiana 53" Quercus virgin 1ana 60" Quercus virg i niana 72" Quercus virginiana 72" Quercus virginiana 77" Quercus virginiana TREE REMO VAL Slas h Pine Slas h Pine Slas h Pine Turk ey Oak WaterOak WaterOak WaterOak WaterOak Li ve Oak live Oak Live Oak Li ve Oak Li ve Oak Live Oak Live Oa k Live Oa k Li ve Oak Live Oak Li ve Oak Li ve Oak Li ve Oak Li ve Oa k Li ve Oak Li ve Oak Li ve Oak Live Oak live Oak Li ve Oak Live Oak live Oak Live Oak Li ve Oa k Live Oak Live Oak Live Oak Li ve Oak Live Oak Live Oak Li ve Oa k Live Oak Live Oak live Oak Li ve Oak Live Oak Live Oak Li ve Oak live Oak Li ve Oa k Li ve Oak Li ve Oak Li ve Oa k Li ve Oak OB.1::1 G.EbW.S. s.eEClES. COMMON NAME GD:'.. 22" Quercus virginiana Li ve Oak 24" Quercus virg iniana 36" Quercus virginiana Live Oak Li ve Oak 22" Carya i lli no i nensis Slash Pine 24" Carya illinoinensis Slash Pine Total T re es To Be Removed: 5 Trees CHA IN LINK = 1. Fencing to be insta ll ed prior to c onstruction. Fe nci ng type sh all be c hain li nk. 2. Th e fence s he ll be erected w/ o m in. d ista nce of 20· fro m the t r un ks o f he ritage trees & 10 ' from o ll other ret ai ned trees . If i nst all in g underground utilit ies neor tree root s becomes a hardship, a soi l au ge r sha ll be used to t unri el under tree root s. 3 . All roots t o be rem oved du r;ng site c learing &/or construction sh e ll be seve red cl ean ly ct the perimeter o f t he prot ected radiu s. 4. Foote rs for wa ll s s ha ll end at t he poi nt wh ere la rge roots ore encountered, o nd the root s sh ell be Dridg ed . Pos t holes o nd tre nc hes located c lose to retained trees s ha ll be adju sted t o avoid d am age to m ajor roo t s . 5 . Fen cin g c annot be removed unt il lan d a lt eration , site c learing. a nd co nstructio n activities ore co mplet e. 2 TREE PROTECTION FENCE -C -3293 43-01 TREE PRESERVATION NOTES TREE S\JBVEY PISCi AIMER · 1. All TR EE SU RVE Y IN FOR MATION HAS BEE N PROVID ED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHl1ECT BY DEWBERRY. IBff PRESERYA TI PNtBEMOYA I NOTES· 1. ALL TR EES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL ARE SHOWN IN A SH ADE OF GR AY, 'M-I ILE All. TREES TO BE PRESERVED ARE SHOWN IN BLACK landscopeorchileclu re land planning r ~ plocernoking ~ ~Foley.Alabama J!l---. tii :~~1~'. 9Ai~b~'!: DES I G N '.:;,,/;!t~i:~,:;,,,, P. 601.790.0781 landsc ape arc hitects www.wos-design.com Revisions 5i a: c Cl) E 0. ~ L ~_o CJ) Cl) I C 0 <( _] ----No. VTW Im, LCW Dot, 02 .26.19 03.15.19 04.07.20 07.12 .21 06.28.23 °""'"' 183163 -084 Project No. 02.21.19 Dot, Sheet Title Revisions / S4Jbm issions aTY SUBM ITTAL CITY SUBM ITTAL.. RE'v1SED PER SITE CHANG E ISSUED FOR BID AS-BU ILT PLANS R istrotion ST H M?. 1 scP.11t- TREE PRESERVATION & REMOVAL PLAN Sheet No. TP100 ,.., [I] "'-' ~~ ...... CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE 0 5TRffT T~U'3 Bet..U 111,;y::i I P .. v~r 5wcn Ll.:JeN-trOC'i'l19 ,nc:t,c:, rt.,tcnc-1 J tJ.ltr;t'l e: C:-.:ipe Myrtle L..nodendron t.Aip,ler.1 I Tu4,p Tn:e PfJrx,~ occ:.do!tlt.:sh ; / Amcnt.Jn 5),amC'f"e Ouei-.c.i!> fyr3t.l f O..erc up 0 ,:,1. Overcv~ p!ICI!~ J W•IIQ"N 0-1► T:i-odh.lffl dt'lo t,c.t,um I ~Id C)preY.t U'~ p:sr-..+fo'.:;i Alice / Al~<?' l..x.:!b:irk. f'm 42 GENERAL NOTES TR££ Pl cV'fYfHI NOTE:% 1.) ALL mas SHAU. BE 15 I.At. AMD/tJR t..s•-2.5• 0Ul AT THE TIME CF Pl.AHTN.. 2.) lREES SHAU. ~ Pl.AHJtD t't1£RY :t)" fRC),t ~C,CS.. A 1Rt£ $HAU. BE P\>HTtO 0HE PE,R LOT OR AT LEAST" CYDl:Y SO FI£T, 9UT NO a.OSER THAN 1Cf. J.) lRE£ 5P£DES AND lR££ PUCD,tCNt' 5HJ.U. 8E APPRCMD-8'I' lHE QTY HCfl11CJLlURIST. ~~SHAU.~ PRUNm SO lHAJ NOl rotJM;t. UMBS OR Ol>ER DB$1RLCTDCS DSSl'lllC BETWE£N 2.5 AHO 10 n:ET F'ROU: !L) IN ARfAS 9iERE PUHTIC SD1tPS .ARE: CPlKICAt. NO NCJti PR1NDED.. Sl0DINJICS TOI f££T OR CftCAlIR SHALL PR0WX ♦'X4' 1REI WEl1S AU1i1C THC a.RI SD 1HE. lREES MAY lilt P1:.AKD IX CXNlAWlC[ lltH 1HESE RECUAOIOITS. ~,:~~~~NGWU.~~IH~~~a:8~~~5=0.AJ~~OR WORE (SCE OAOIMAHCE roR USl). 0 OP..t1AMftlTA~ fPJ!r.S 7 7.) DEW1.DP£R SHAU. BE R£SPC:INS8..C f'0R WAl(RINC l'R£E5 PRICR TO SIJBDMSlc»t ACCEPlNCE AND DlRNC 2-'l'tAR MAIODINK:E ....... lie, ~ ,ntenu.:,t.:, l""o;ten I roster 'lo Molly U'Je.rst.-oem,a ~ M:i t che= I Cr.,pe Myrtle l..'J\l,trllffl J.>pon•cllffl I N;u Lc:.1f L,qv~trum M .19no1 . .1 11 .r,;pn.:111.1 I ~Yeel b,:,) f..1->:Jf:ol,J OsrtUnlhuS fr;,iy::in!!I I s.,.,eet Ohve P..r.1fl1 ,olc:p ,, mc:lu:, R.o!l-.')h,,c:IJ I P.os.>for1dJ M:.iw·t11orn~ T rec V1IC:1' .1q1ws•CJ~l1o1" I Cl1.>~t c Trcc 1 JBff f'SPJfCJJClt NOE; I ,) lMD .. EXCUS OF' 2f/' .. OUMElER ARE CDNSIOEREDI eRQ11:C'TED. 2.) TRllS SHAU. fC)T BC All,ICW(D PRIOR m ISSUMC£ er P.ERl,IIT l0 DO so. ~~ =--~~fil~ .. A~~~~tl'~~~~~o~™OR~:'mc PERMIT •THtt 14 'l0RDfC OA-.S Afl(JI illfCEPl 0IF .IHWCAllCII. QSDIBffl) MFA HOD Nff ocsnM9ED AREAS SHAU.. REa:M: S00 QR MUt:.01 AS NCCES.'SNN.. All. l!NCJSCAPE BEDS ARE to RECtJVE: 3• DEPTH LDNC I.EN" Pl£ sntAW • .scm..m = TRENCH EDGE TO BE LOCATED BEIWEEN! .Mll!. PWmNC BED AREAS AND AOIACENT Tl:llilF AAEA.S, llNl..ESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 0 ~R-E1~;H EDGE STAKING DETAIL sa ROOTBM.L CROWN 1 112· HIGHER T>WI THE SURROIJNm<C F1NlS>IEI) GRADE_ SLOPE EW:KFIU. AWAY fROM ROOTBAU. FOR POSIIIYE. DRMNACE. [jQ:ffJW CQNO[TIQNS CONTRACTOR SWU BE RESPONSl81!£ fOR: tlHE SlTE INSPECDON PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE ~ MO• INSTAU:AlTON.1 1N1 ORDER TO AeQUAINT H1MSO.F WITH = CONOCllONSc ooomw:roR SHAU BE RE5J?ONSISll: FOR LOCATING AU EX1S1WG UNOERGROtJND Ulll!Jl1ES BERIRE BEQNNINC C8NSTRLICTION. COIITRACtOR IS RESP°"51en.E FOR PRCITE!:110" "" WlllSCN'E 1WERW. AT ALL TMES. UHllSCAPE CllKlRAl:lllR 10 l:OOR!!llf!IIITT: SAFE Sf,!GING AREA WITH CENDW.. COIITIW:1tlR ANDICR (MNER CONTIW:TOR $WU cw.RANTEE Alli!._ Pl!Nlt MAT£RJAL!.. INCWOING CRASS. F'OR 365 CONSECJTNE: CAL.ENDifR DA'rS FROM: SUBSTN<CW.. ~CINI OF THE WORK. #S OCIUIMl<ED B't ll!E PROJECi !N<llSCAPE "8QtllECt. AU AREAS IMPACtm NE6'TM!.l' BY. CONStRUCTION1 P.RO€.£SSES SHAU!.. BE REil.RHED 10 CRIGlNAt.. CONOlllONl DR' 8EliIIR PRIOR TO SUBSJANTW. COMPLETlON. L,AHDSCAPf AfD. SQll PRFPNWJQNI SOIL stW!.l. BE AMENDED 8" lJHE ADOIDON €11: COMl?OSJr AND ftRTIUZER. COMPOST 1YP£. Sl:W.l BE WWiROOII alMPQSlf OR 0Ea:0Mf?OSED· PINE BARK. AND SHAU. BE APPROVED BY flMosc,.pE AROIIT'Ect PRIOR TD l?tJRQifASE.. COMPOST SHAU. B£ UNJF'CRMt!..Y Al?PfilED 0"'9 1?1!.AN.rtJNG' BEDS A.T AN I A.\'£:RAGE DEPTH Of 2 INOlES ANO mQ 500 AREAS .0 "'1 A~GE eE?'lkl o, J/~ INOt INCORPORAlE. CCIMl?OSll' tJNlfORMt'11' INJ l?l!,I.NrrlNG: BEDS tO A, OEPlH <F. 15 INCHES AND IN SCI) AREAS to, A EEP-Tlrfl Qli .1, INOHES IUSIN.G. A ROI.ARY Titl.ER OR OTHER APPROPRIATE EIJJll?MOllL PllE-1?1.ANl ITRlllU!ZER ANO! PH A81lJS'llN~ Al:ENlS {E.~ UME ANO SUmJR) IIAl BE Al'i'IUED I~ a!NWNCTION WITH COMPOST INCORP.ORA.TI~ AS Na:ESSARY. RAK£ SOil SVRf'ACE SMOO'THr PRIOR TO ?\L4NTINC... ADICNE ST0N£S LW:iER mw I! INQtl IN.' Alff DIWENSIO!'M AND,I snO<S. RIXllS. RUEIISHr. AHO Cl1HER EXTRMEOtlS MA1iT'Ell AN01 l.&'il!L'I!' DISPCl5£ OF THEM. OFF OWNER'S PROPERr'(. WA l'ER tkiOROUQfllY N'1ER. PIWlTINC.. CONlRAC:toR SJiW.l. BE RE5P.ONSIBl!.E R>R PRCNIOJNC: 3X l?OSCTM: DRAINAGE IN ALL PWmNG 8EDs.. ""' O!HER P.ROl?CJSED> DRAINAGE ME™t!IOS SHMcl. BE COOftDINATEE. wmt. PllNffiNG EneRTS HJ1 MINIMIZE. G:cJNl:lJffi, ANO lilAlNfNM PROPER FlJNCTIC!lN Of" DRAINAGE smEMS. 0 ~:~~RAL PLANT ING NOTES Pl.ANT MAJEBW.-ANO PIANTING PUNT QUANTITIES ARE OfF£RED IS A. CONVENIENCE to THE WNJ:RAC:lilR~ ANO ARE NOT A8SOUJTE.. CONTRACTOR SHAU. VERIFr l?i!N(li eQUNli lraOMI Pl.M N4l REPORT IHfFERENCES.. ALL Pl.NIT MA1UftAlS ARE SUBJECT TO APPRC'llJL CR REF.tlSAll.. 8'17 TEE OWNER OR INIOSCAPE ARCHITECT AT ll!E JOB STTE PlANTS St-WJ. BE WEl.L FORMED, VIGOROUS.. CROWING; SPEDMENS. Wmll GROWTH TYPICAL. Of" VARSETIES SP.EOflED, ANI!), Sf.W!J!.. BE EREE EROM' INJUR"f, ENSECTS AND DISEASES. PUNTS SHAll. BlOAtl.. lilfli Sl!IRPASS: QUAU1Y AS OEfffED IN 1HE CURRENT ISStJE CF •.fMERICAN! STANO.ARCS FOR NURSERY STOOC-AS PUBUSHED BY lHE AMERICANJ Nl!lRSER'Oif~ INC.. UNlESS NOTED SP£CiflCAU.Y, All PlNIJ WJi1lERW. SIAAl!.1l BE BAl!J!Bl! ANO, BUR1.APP£D OR CONTAINER CROWN.. FRONT ROW Of SHRUBS SHAU BE PlANtED F.RaMi ~ENTER' C!)fi l?tlANiJ A. MINIMUM Of 2♦• BOilND BED LINE O I.AWNS QR WAl!J<S, ANOJ A1 MlNJMtlM I OF" J6" BACK OF" CURB O PARJ<IHC SPACES. NO PRUNING SHOULD BE PERfORMED DURING F.lRSli GRIJWING SEASQNI EXCEPT FOR REMOVING DAMAGED OF 0001 GAOWJ'litl WmJNDI l?AIN.lr IS: NeT RECOUIIENOED FOR »rr CUlS. ALL P\NIJ1NC NI.EIS, TRff PITS, AND OlMER ARE/oS, INDICATEDI 0~ ~CANS, SHALL BE MULCHED WITH A SEJll.£D \AYER Clf 11:tE INDICATEDl MU ll~t- □ 3• DEPTH P1NE BARK 0 4" OEPIH SllREDO£D IWIOWOOI) MUl!ffl [8J J" OEP'lH UJNCt£AF PINESIRAW. SEmm TRENCH EDGE TO BE l.OCAlID BEJWEEH A!!.L PLANJlNG. AREAS NIIOl l!AW.N~ UNl£SS NOllD 01HEIIW1S£. TREE STNONG SIW.L BE PRCMOED TO KEEP TREES l?IWMB, AND> PR0TmT£DJ FROM EXCESSNE WlNOS. All TREE-SW<ING. Al?P.ARATtlS SBAlUl. BE R£M0VED AT THE END OF" TliE ONE-Yf.lR -· PERIDDL ONE YEAR Of' t.AN05CAPE WAI~ FRCM'i SOBSTN<TW!.. <WMP.ll.BION SHALL BE INCUJOED IS Nl OPTIONAt.. 810 rrEM, T0 TftE OWNER!. ~6-W)Sl~T l----=--.:.~✓~i~ill:>_-:._"_J ___ -} ~lfAi~~tis. PLANT PIT DETAIL 32934.3.26-02 ~eo:;~◄- \'11.' ,, s DESIGN 1_,, ... _ ... ,, ........... 1 .... 1.,1 ........ ,.,.a-,_.1.,.,, :llt<V••-... r;.a.,..i.L...""'•~ •~-:,1~n•• ""-:•1 u ::: ·-·-'--·- IIOI' ... CGli8IIIIUCIDil TH£5,E PUNS IIAV£ NOT BEEN Al'l'IIOV[D l'I THE GOYUMJNC AGENCY A>ID AR£ SU8JECT TO CHANC E. ~--------------No. -_,_ -~ -=CIT'l.:.:..:SlllllTl==I(.._ ____ _ -~ -=CIT'l=511l1111TR.=::·::·=------ --------------- --------------- ------------------------------ -tB\1163,-0li~ ... ;;,,, ... 0!2'.2U9 .... , LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN Sl>oofNo. LP200 I I 7 ::: C ::: ~.-Iv"J2-r-.l.l:'..J4:..-l ' ... :::---:: I -r---------------. ....>. I ~ : 1w· I -_j_ ____ l. _ _:;,"· ' I • I P...,.. I W I I t~ ------, t...-... load<copo o,chilec\"c, londplonn ing ,~ T~ plocemaking ,= Foley,Alobomo r!t-.. ii ~•b;~, t~~b~m, P. 251.948.7181 DES I G N Jockooa, MIHlnlppl P. 601. 790.0781 landscape architects www.wcis-d!llsfgn.com Revisions __ ---,------ No. Oote Revisions / Sllbmissions _ 02.26.19 _:CITY=-::,SU=BM=ITT"-=------ 03.15.19 CITY SUBMITTAL. --- 04.o7 .20 R!'.1SED PER SITE CHANG E 07.12.21 ISSUED FOR BID ---..c:;:;.=....~---- 06.28.23 AS-BU ILT PIANS ---------- VTW °"'"' LCW '""""' 183163-084 Project No. 02 .21 .19 Dot, Sheet Title R istrotion ST H M?. 1 SCP.~ OVERALL PLANTING PLAN Sheet No. LP100 Dewberry~ Dewberry Engineers Inc 25353 Frien ship Road Daphne. AL 36526 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION LONGBRANCH 251 990 9950 251 99099101a ww dewben y com I_. JASON ESTES, PE the undersigned, a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Alabama holding Certificate Number 22714 , hereby certify that I have reviewed the design herein which was done under my direct control and supervision and that , to the best of my knowledge and to the best of my belief, substantially confonns to the requirements of the Fai Subdivision regulations and to all other rules , regulations , laws , and ordinances pplicab to my design . Date LONGBRANCH Plans which are certified consist of Page 1 thrn X5 , each of which bears my seal and ---signature . Drainage calculations were designed in conjunction with construction plans for LONGBRANCH . Additional construction infonnation concerning drainage can be found in the referenced construction plans . STA MP IDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned property owner(s) Michael Dilworth , President -Dilworth Development, Inc . (Fill in name(s) of Property Owner/Association) hereinafter "Indemnitor" does hereby grant to the City of Fairhope , a Municipal Co rporation , hereinafter called the "City" on this 22nd day of June 20 23 the following: entry features , sig na ge, and fence WHEREAS , Indemnitor desires to locate a _______ on the City right-of-way in accordance with C ity Code on propeliy located at Longbranch Subdivision -Twin Beech Road see attached image (Complete address of property) and ; WHEREAS , Indemnitor agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless the City , its agents , servants, and employees from any claims and liability which may be made against the City for entry features, signage , and fence permitting the __________ to be located on the City right-of-way. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City permitting the Indemnitor to locate a entry features , signage, and fence on the City right-of-way, the Indemnitor hereb y agrees: ---------- lnd emnitor undertakes to indemnify the City from any and all li ability, loss or damage the City may suffer as a result of the c laim s, demands , costs or judgment against and arising . . . entry features , signage , and fence . . . from the loc ation of the 111demn1tor's ________ bemg on the City's right-of-way. Indemnitor agrees to defend , at its own expense against any claims brought or actions filed against the City with respect to the subj ect of the indemnity contained herein , whether such claims or act ions are rightfully o r wrongfully brought or filed. I acknowledge that the City takes no responsibility for upkeep or maintenance of the entry features, s ignage , and fence in the right of way. Indemnitor agrees to reimburse the City for any necessary expenses , attorney fees , or costs incurred in the enforcement of this Ind emnity Agreement. STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN Property Owner Michael Dilworth -President, Dilworth Development, Inc . Propet1y Owner I, _r;...:....i.MN~-'V:.....;U,,=-=--_J..:.....:....>.~--C::-~___;:_....:...=Llt:;~ ______ Notary Public in and for said county in said state , hereby ce11ify that _vV\ __ t _v\;\,=.,.,{).,<..C.....CCJ-'----'()=-.ct.....,t'""w_o_✓--'-~---------' whose name(s) is /are signed to the foregoing instrument and who is known to me , acknowledged before me on this day that being informed of the contents of this agreement , has /have executed the same on the day the same da~ J J U \An Given under my hand and officia l seal on this the _lb_/;r __ day of ___ v_'-'C ___ _, 20 2-~ Invoice Date 6/9/2023 Invoice # 5765 Bill To Dilworth Development Sam Leslie 2124 Moores Mill Road, Suite 130A Auburn, AL 36830 Pond Elegance, LLC 3210 Dawes Rd Mobile, AL 36695 Terms Due Date 6/9/2023 251.639.2546 tammie@pondelegance.com www.pondelegance.com Total Balance Due Subtotal Sales Tax (8.0%) Payments/Credits NOTE: Credit Card Payment A Service fee of 3% will be added for credit card payments Description AmountServicedQtyRate 2HP Aerating Fount. 200' Cord, 60Hz, 208 - 240V, 1PH, 12.6 amp, Vertical 4,461.95T4,461.95 Cable assembly, 12/4 200', 4 pin ALC end 1,110.69T1,110.69 Panel, 2HP, LED light ready 1,834.74T1,834.74 Nozzle Assy, 2HP Lakewood 41.56T41.56 5 year warranty Nozzle Pattern: 10' x 24'' Freight 500.00500.00 Floating Fountain Anchor 15lb 119.94T3 39.98 3/8" Anchor Rope 36.00T50 0.72 Misc Pipes and fittings - Conduit (90') Post 250.00T250.00 24" Trencher 290.00290.00 Install Fountain with 3 anchors and anchor rope. Trench from shoreline to electrical source, run power cable in conduit underground. 800.00800.00 NOTE: If Power is not available at installation there will be an additional charge to complete the installation and test the fountain once power is supplied. 50% deposit required to order Fountain Estimate expires 1 month from date $10,073.27 $0.00 $9,444.88 $628.39 -$10,073.27 From:Monte DavisTo:planningSubject:Longbranch subdivision PPIN#: 77788 Case: SD23.18Date:Wednesday, June 28, 2023 12:59:52 PMI have one of the adjacent properties to the new proposed subdivision. Although the City is inthe process of accepting the Longbridge subdivision, the traffic on Barndling St. has become aspeeding thoroughfare, already. The speeding humps are not a deterrent, as they are too low. Cars and trucks are going over them at speeds in excess of 45 miles per hour, and NOTslowing. That’s very bad news, for our residential neighborhood. My proposal, as a current Sedgefield and Fairhope resident: Speed humps should be raised another inch or two, on the Longbranch side of Barndling St. The speed hump on Sedgefield Ave. does slow traffic effectively, and should be copied. Two additional 20 MPH signs to be placed on the Sedgefield side of Barndling St., one in each direction. Another speed deterrent hump should be placed on the Sedgefield side of Barndling St. All of the above recommendations should be considered to be the developer’s cost, as the deterrents currently established, are not working. Alice Davis 375 Barndling St, Fairhope, AL 36532 251-422-879211] From:Tracy FridleyTo:planningSubject:Longbranch Subdivision PPIN#77788CaseSD23.18Date:Thursday, June 29, 2023 8:47:02 AMI own a house three doors down from this new proposed subdivision. I am extremely unhappythat I wasn’t ware of this having been approved, when I purchased my house in October 2020. Barndling St has already become a thoroughfare for speeders. The two speed bumps are toosmall to be effective. As a current resident of Sedgefield and Fairhope, I request that the speed bumps be raised two more inches. Another speed bump should be placed at the intersection of Sedgefield and Barndling. The above recommendations should be at the developer’s cost. Tracy Newman Fridley 382 Barndling St 404-558-2793 -- Tracy Fridley11] SPRI NG RUN DR WINDSORDR N S P R I N GPARKD R GREENO RDGREENO RDSMIDDLEST WIN D S O R D R N CARROLL PLACE DRCity of FairhopePlanning Commission July 6, 2023 ¯ SPRING RUN DRMIDDLEST GREENO RDWIN D S O R D R N SD 23.22 - Venner LLC MOP Legend Roads Parcels Corporate LimitsZoning Classification B-2 - General Business District B-4 - Business and Professional District M-1 - Light Industrial District R-1 - Low Density Single-Family R-3PGH - Patio/Garden Single-Family R-4 - Low Density Multi-Family Planning Jurisdiction ^ Project Name: Venner LLC MOPSite Data: .60 AcresProject Type: Multiple Occupancy ProjectJurisdiction: Fairhope Planning JurisdictionZoning District: B-2PPIN Number: 91211General Location: West of Greeno Road South and South of Spring Run DriveSurveyor of Record: Lieb Engineering CompanyEngineer of Record: Lieb Engineering CompanyOwner / Developer: Venner LLCSchool District: Fairhope Elementary School Fairhope Middle and High Schools Recommendation: Prepared by: µ µ Approve Mike Jeffries r Page 5 of 10 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL Application Type: D Village Subdivision D Preliminary Plat D Minor Subdivision D Informal (No Fee) □ Final Plat (;21 Multiple Occupancy Project Attachments: D . ticles of Incorporation or List all associated investors Date of Application: -~~Z_Z-~/Z_o_z,,__.~- Property Owner / Leaseholder Information Name of Property Owner: t/f,J,J~g_ \.\..C.. Phone Number: z.,s-,,c.{~~-qq.:tci Address of Property Owner: B<?1::kB "$ffl..1,.;>'--~r/. g.O City: -FA, i<\-t0f?€:-State: 6-L Zip: 5',5~,._ Proposed Subdivision Name: _V~e=n=n~e=r~L=L=C _______________ _ No. Acres in Plat: ...... 0'"'"'.6....,0..__ _______ No. Lots/Units: _+_.____ _____ _ Parcel No: 05-46-05-21-0-000-012 001 Current Zoning: ..... B ..... -2..._ ____ _ Authorized Agent Information Pla t must be signe d by th,: properly owner before acceplance by the City of Fairhope- Name of Authorized Agent: Lieb Engineering Company Phone Number: 251 978-9779 Address: 1290 Main Street Ste E City: Daphne State: AL Zip: _36_5_2_6 __ _ Contact Person: Chris Lieb Surveyor/ Engineer Information Name of Firm: Lieb Engineering Company Phone Number: 251 978-9779 Address: 1290 Main Street Ste E Cily: Daphne State: AL Zip: _36_5_2_6 __ _ Contact Person: Chris Lieb Plat Fee Calculation: Reference: Ordinance 1269 Signatures: I certify that I am the property owner /leaseholder of the above described property and hereby submit this plat to the City for review. *If property is owned by Fairhope Single Tax Corp. an authorized Single Tax representative shall sign this applicaa c..'"'«~ M..ts~,,-.1 AC--- Property Owner /Leaseholder Printed Name Signature '- Date 1 SD 23.22 Venner, LLC MOP – July 6, 2023 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of Venner, LLC for preliminary approval of a 4-unit multiple occupancy project. The property is approximately 0.6 acres and is located on the south side of Spring Run Drive just east of South Greeno Road. The lot is an undeveloped lot surrounded by office and residential uses that is not directly adjacent to a public right-of-way. November 14, 2022 the property was conditionally annexed into the City of Fairhope as B-2 Ordinance #1761. Christopher Lieb, PE, of Lieb Engineering Company, serves as the engineer of record (EOR) for subject application. Comments: The applicant has provided a site plan illustrating two (2) proposed 1,732sf buildings with two (2) units each at with a gross density of 6.67 units per acre. There are a total of 18 parking spaces provided; and meets the requirements for Medical offices/clinics and General Office establishments. There is also an uncovered courtyard area between the two (2) buildings. Board of Adjustment approval is required for several uses in B-2 including the Clinic use. Table 4-3 – Parking Schedule Health Facilities : Ho sp ita l , Convalescent o r Nursing Homes and 1 sp ace for each 4 b eds, plus 1 space for ea.ch 4 emp foyee sirrnilar i.t1Stitul:ionaul uses irn duding nurs es._ Kenne s and Animal Hospirtiau A parking a.ice a. equal to 30 p erc ent of th e total enclosed o r co vered airea _ Medica l ifontai and health o ffi ces , and C]inics 1 spac e for each .-00 square foot o f floor area us ed for offic es, Businesses: General Retail and Office establishments 0 to 400 square feet of 4 parking spaces floor area - 400 to 5000 square feet of same as above plus 1 for each floor area -additio nal 400 square feet over 5000 square feet of same as above plus 1 parking floor area --space for each additional 200 square feet 2 SD 23.22 Venner, LLC MOP – July 6, 2023 Utilities: • Fairhope Utilities are available for all utilities with aid to construction costs to be determined during permitting. Utilities are to be routed through a utility easement on the northeast side of the subject property. Adjacent landowner’s have consented to said easement, but an actual easement will need to be recorded as an easement in Probate and shown on the Final MOP plan. • Trash is individual roll-out cans with two (2) for each building. • The Water Department will require and Aid to Construction cost for a hydrant to placed along the ROW of Spring Run Dr. Traffic: • A traffic study is not required. Drainage: • A Drainage Report has been provided by the Engineer of Record. The site is one drainage area that drains south to the adjacent property. Captured run-off will be captured into an open, dry detention pond. An Operations and Maintenance Plan has been provided. The parking lot is pervious. Greenspace Requirements: • The greenspace requirement per Article V, Section C(2) is 10% for this commercial MOP, which translates to 0.06 acres. TO TAL SITE DATA; 1. ZON I C: 2. LOT SIZE: 3. PROPOS ED BU ILD I " HEI GHT: TO T.' L GROSS FLO O f' EA: 5. PROPOS ED BU ILDI G COV ER. GE: 6. PERC TJ.-.G E I PERV IOUS ,R EA : 7. PERC 8 T E OF LA DSC .tiPI C: Fl. PROPOS ED f OF PARKING SPOTS: REQ UIRED , OF PAR KI C SP0 ; 10. MECH I L E Q U I P ~◄Et-JT V.llL BE LOC ATED I~~ : VEN ER, LLC 8076 -B SF ING RUN D IVE FAJ RHO E, AL. 35532 H-2 D.6D ± ACR ES 20"-6" 3,4.f.'i 4 S,F, 3.464 S.F. '8% 52% 18 17.32 J THE REAR OF THE BUI LLl'ING THE SrTE IS LO TED IN ZO NE X PER THE LATEST mm PUB U:S HED BY FEMA.. 3 SD 23.22 Venner, LLC MOP – July 6, 2023 Landscaping Requirements: • The landscape area requirement is 20% of the parcel or 5,245sf. The proposed landscape area covers 13,638sf. Site Plan Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of SD 23.22 Venner MOP. i I r- l:'nits Per Ac r e Less than 2 units per acre 2-4 units per acre 4-6 units per acre More than 6 units per acre Multiple Occupancy Proj ect -Commercial 1 \ \ -\=-- ®s 1 9i>--.. ::i "a~Gn.ocl \J 1! ---------------------------rs----~-- Greenspace Amoun 10% 15% 20% ~5% X L_ REVIS IONS ISSU ED FOR INFORMATI ON 52323 ~I w ~I z 0 a:: u.. b ( ) ,S9 9t J "8'z.,60.00 N 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER -,, l r l ·, :,1 ) ·, ,, l ' ·1 't 1 ---1-10' SIDE SETBA~K )( M 08 181 B )'.£,!,_ l .00 IIJ LIEB ENBINEERINB (; 0" ,11 N 'f 2022 -103 DRAWN BY: ____-!l& X t Cf) ~ cp z DATE : -----1.L1.lL1L SCALE:~ CHECKED BY· ___Q_L_ APPROVED BY· ___Q_l ENGR: __i.,Jl_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VENN ER DEVELOPM ENT $HEIT NUMBER OF 10 0 - CS.O ISSUED FOR REVIEW REVI SIONS ISSUED FOR INFORMATION ADDR ESS ED CITY COMM ENTS 52323 62023 L_ LIEB ENC31NEERINB e O l'I ~ /II NT REQ'O; TRANS IT10N CURBING FROM6"TOO'IN5' I REQ'O: 6•STHl0---{)f'CUlBING (SEE OCT.o.L >ffi.) 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 ~RITEFLU!.E (S!:E OCT.o.L) REQ'(): 6"STmtl-ll' CUR9NG (Sl'E OCTAL SHT.) REO'O TAANSITONCURONGfROM6·ro o"1N 5' ~PAVNG (SEE DETM_ SHT.) VENN ER DEVELOPM ENT NOT VA LID WITH OUT THE DATED SIGNATUR E ANO SEAL OF AN ALABAMA LICENSED ENGINEER . SITE & UTILI TY PLAN liQIES_;_ 0 - SU~ITI C2.0 FOR GEJW!AL OOITS Cl..[l,1'0UJ'S OIi Tl£ satOi U~E SlilLL BE IIISTAWD AT nE COl<NECTOI TOM Ol!I LDNG 5"0IJISIOC THEFN:1:.0fn£WLDll!G, All6°Pll'ESSHI.LLHA\'E CUNtOUTS INSWLEO ~l 100' l!llTRW,LS . .S. IIUI LO NG fEIGHTSIW.lfENIIGRrAlER Tf'AN~'IIICWDlltGAACHITCTURAL FIATU!!ES,PARl.f'IT WlrLLS.ROCf"[O(J Pt.EHT/SC~~O THELl<E. 4. SlllrT,\RY SE~CESstW.18EN:REIII U!'ONflml'E[N.<Pl'UC,l,HT 1'€)PUBLK:ll'ORKS ~ ZON NG, 0-2 LOT SIZE 06(H ACRES PROPOSfDBUI.D!NC HO::HT 20'-6" TOT"1.GROSS flOORAA.fA. PROPOSIDllm .DI NG COVERN;.E; PERC ENT/a llilPEfMOUS AA[A; ~ P!:RCOOl,G[ Of LMOSCN'ING 52l PROPOs.ffilOfPAAKINGSPOTS 18 ~o. ;~~,E~i:T~~;-LOC,\.TED AT THE RU.R o/;;tt BUWNG ISSU ED FOR RE VIE W LIE B ENG INEERING COM PANY ALABAMA LI CENSED EN GINEER : CHRISTOPHER JAY UEB, P.E. LICENS E NUMB ER 31204 f--------------------+ 1290 MA IN STR EET , SUITE E ALABAMA CERTIFICATE OF AUTH OR IZATION NUMBER: 4938 FAIRHOP E, AL 2022 -103 CHECKED BY· ___Q_L_ APPROVED SY· ___Q_l ENGR: __i.,Jl_ PH:0Ar2H5~~• 9~8~:~~: f--J-08_N_U-M8_E_R -~------------------+-O_WN_E_R _VE_N_NE_R_. L~LC __________ ~ _ _, DRAWN BY: ---':!!& DATE : ----1.L1.lLn_ SCALE : 1"=20' SHEET NUMB ER OF 1D C6.0 REVIS IONS EROSION CO NTROL LEGEND 'rrl'E A"SlT FOONG :& @ TOPSO L NQIES_;_ ~@comTRUCTION EXIT P.-D @PERIMNENT SEIDINC SEE SH EIT C2.0 FORGENElW.NOTES 1,1..L ROOFD!WNSSHl,LL (!E T/,j(EI/UNDERGROUNCl ll'ITH CO!.LECOON HE.IOERS 0 e ;TTs~r'~~t::~t~ _, / TENEWISl'IW.TTOlllSTIM;ASWl,LT. CONllW:TDFt~D!SlJ![ASolOO™ TIWISITT(IIWl™NOSTIJRMlll,l,IDI POIDI«; / L_ ISSU ED FOR INFORMATION ADDR ESS ED CITY COMM ENTS J1 X 52323 62023 ii C ii 1l I\ I I r I I \\ --- ( 1@' c;Jg~ _ _3__.,8£,6rulcl N ) I I LIEB ENGHNEERINB / \ / / d / ) I '\ --- I I I I I l " \ \ I I I I '\ I I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ 'ii, I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I "' I I I JI \I I t VENN ER DEVELOPM ENT SC,,.LE;r•HT ER OSIONCQNJRQ LNOTE S· I. SiTEEROSIONCONTROl..t.EASUF!E5S!W.LBE~~ilt',NCEI\IT'nAl.l.FEDERAL. STATE. 00 LOCAL LAWS, COOCS1 NIO REGll,\71111/S. 2 lill.EROSlONCONTRO..Dr.lCESS fW.l.BEPROPEf!LYlilAINTNHElllllil<INCnE CONSTRUCTKJN PROCESS ,VI[! u,;TI L /,LL DISTLiR!EJ AArAS H.11\'E !llN PERIW4ENTU STNIUZED.Al.l.EROSIONCONTl!Ol.114ST/i.lATION/,H,J t.WfflJW.CE SHALL I£ SOW.Y THE RESPOffSIBI LITY OF T~E OONT'1ACTOR ANO Stt.1.1.L 1£ AT NO .IOOIOON,l,L COST TO THE OWNER 5. EROSION CONTROi.. ornru SHO'fl'N (llj IBESE IUl<S ARE A r.tllllti\lr.t, l,[ll)'T()NAL DEVICES SHALI.OC INSTl,LLEOAS REOUREO TO f'l!E\IDCT SLTATION , EROSION ANO OTH ER OCGRAD,O.TONORP(UllOON TQllESIT[ORAOJACOOPROPERTES. STREAMS.OITCHES.l.lfDPIJ!LClll.l.l.[lWA"l'i. 4 EROSION CONTROI..Dr.1<BSHl,LLl ~l.ll:E. B'I.JT NOT IJl,lfTID, TO HE FOLLOWING DEVICES: SLT FENONC,BRIISHBERl,IS,SEOIMENT 8'SINS,l)EHNTONPON:IS, STRAW WATTLES. CHECK DAMS. Fl ill! BERlilS, M E r.tATT,iG, \'EC ITATNE FLTER STRPS, TU!lf REINFORCD!E~ W.T, Dl'<fRSiON BERlilS. ETC 5. 11£ CClNTRACTOR S-H/,1..L BE RESPOl'ISIIU FOR 1,llrH<T~N l!IC lill. EROSION COWTRQ DEVICES INGOOD OPERA.TI NC'COHOlllONDU.!l ~Al.l.lAIIDDISTURBING ACTMTlES ~~RE~~LJTY :0 1:1:~ CLEANIJ!' MD/OR R!P>J!S TO nE Dr.1CES 6 EROSION CONTROi. ornru SH.11.L IE l.lONITOl!EDANO r.lAINTlllffED UffTl nE SITE HAS BEEN PERr.wt:NT\.Y STNILiZEll AND AFTER OCH R.UfFl,U GREATER THAN 0.5 NCfB III A24 HOURPERIOO,N«il1 NOGUSTSGRfl.TERllAA251WH,ANDANY SIJST;Jlfll i11 NOS GREATERlli'.N 20 11PH IN A 2•HOIJRPffik>D 7 lfTERALL LAIIODISTlJR!W;cf ACTMTIESHAVECEASED .lilO AfTERlill.DISTI.lllBED :~~~ ~EN~~=:)t:u:, ~=~==ES SHALL 8 COIATERING OPER.1.71005 W.Y ~ 9f OISCHAA(ll) N A 1,1.1,NN[JI' THAT CNJS[S :si~r ~i. OR P(UUT"Of'I TO HlJll:fNT ~t:RllES, Sl'WJ.IS, DITCHES, g_ ACRA\'ELED ACCESSORM:0F SIJFF10a,ITSIZE!Wiil.BE ATEACHSITE OOIWICE/EITT TOPREVOOTRJOIING CFOIRT ANl)SE()MD/TONTOPUBLICOR 1'R'-'ATE RCl<D'IIA1"S.F SECOCHTROCHi:3 TH E 'r?ON11/AY,TlO rT MUST 9EQ[..\IIED ~T THE E~D ~ OCH WQRKt)o.y 10, lil LJ.NO ~~ IICTMTES :i-Wl. If COIIDUCilll IN ~ LOOO.. ~01,UtC E TO Mi'il!,!IZE M EXPOSIJRE Of !IAAE!J<~ ~T /<Hf ()If: Til,IE, 11. ~ =~ AADS LEFT IN.'Cl'Mc FOR IIOl!Ell'AI< 10 0,11"5 SHIILL BE SEEDED 12.PRIORTOSITE CLE.AAINC,Al.l.PERlt,£JU'1lT Frnt:l""•IIRVSHBERt.lS,ITC.NID GAA\'ELffi ACCESS ORl\'ES SfW.l. BE 1,mAl.llD. \j, lill.EXISTI NCSTREAMS. DITCHES, rn:,SfW.l.f!E?RIITECTED ~~IIIENTSAIIO SI LTSEi'YSI LT f'ENC ING,il'ATTLES.~BERMS.ITC. \4 . il'~Tn.ES OR SI LT FENCING SfW.J. BE L'ISTAWD AT AU. IN..ITS Uf'0/1 TH E 15. ~~~~ ~l'tX~: ,:r~l,LL IM~TEI.Y fUl.llWIIIG CONSTRUCTKJNOF~f£AIJ\ll"1.L \6. GEOTEXTLESI-Wl. BE PV<;ED ON Ail. 2:1 SOI: SLOPES. GEOTEXllLE SH,l,LLBE NCJlTH I.MERICANGREENSC \500R APl'R(l\t[DEQiJ,ILUNLESS OT\£J!\IILSE~TED 0N ~M~~~~ES SH,IU fl: NSTltiED POI IBE -IH .CT\IRITfS 17. GEOTEXTlE SfWl.BEPlJtEDllNAU.j,1Sl!ESLOPES.GEITTDlllLESHAI.L BE NORTH/iMERICANGREENS 150DRoll'PRC\'ED EQU\LUN..!SSOTH EllWIS£NOTEO ON PV,NS. ALL CEOTOOLES SH,IU BE INST.II.ill) P~ TH E I.WI\.OCTIJRER"S RECOMMENO,\TIONS. \6, GEOTHTlESW.U.SEPLJtEDON1,LLOrrCH BOTTOIIS.t:fl/PEJOjS11:E. GEOTEl(l"lE 51-Wl. 8E NORTH I.MDCICAN GREIN 5C250 OR ll'!'f!O'IED EOOAL LHISS OTH ERWISE ~TED ONPcN!S.Al.lCEOTOOU:S SH!i.l 9EIIISTlilEDJ>EllTHE -UFN:TIJl!ER'SRECOMMDIO,l,TIQHS.. Ii GOOD HOUSEXEEPING PRJ,CTCB" /,NO f>RE.VENTATM: ~ 5HOJl BE PERFOR!,£0 ON SlTE 00.Y TO PI\E.VENT l'CU VOON SWlCE5 fliOII CONTl,CTl'IG STORMWATER 00 GROUND WATEll. IB IS INCI.\JOCS, Bl.IT IS NOT U,I ITEDTO: EOUI PI.IENT INSP[Cll Otl FOR LE.11(S O'" HAZAAOOUS W.TEf!W.5,, PICl!lJI' ,INO Pl!OPffi Dl'SPOSI<. ~ WASTE W.TrnALS TO liPPR(M[l OISPOS,l,L SllfS, STORIIIG COOAAIERS A/'IDBN.SAWAY fROl,ITRNflC ROIJITS,Pl!El .. (JZl'IC POI.LlmOl!Fft'¥'Ufl~ CONCCT'TS llflOOGH POSH:RS, ll'lrSHINC EOOl!'lilOO l,NO VD1 (LES AT N'PROVED ~"fMll~S.LOCATONS,l,NtllJSIIIGON LYWlrlER (NODITEJIGEIIT'S)FOR WI.Sft NG 20. ~~:~~~ ~r:~~ ~00:~i.'IOON ~SEBt:P~D~~ IE NSTAl.l.ED lrol /olfY W TK»IAL SI LW OII. EROSDH. /HJ emu Dl:CRAOATlOO OR =:~ ~Tr:~t0!1~:~n!s ~S-~ES. ANO Pl/f!I..IC 21. 11£ CONTRACTOR SH.11.L 512[. INSN.l, !,NO r.lAINTAH-IADEQU,\TI COIITROLS FOR THE ~~'.!tsr~~~[:~~ESS:~~ liREAS,LATESTEOITION ISSUED FOR REVIEW NOT VA LI D WITH OUT THE DATED SIGNATUR E AND SEAL OF AN ALABAMA LICENSED ENGINEER. GRAD ING, DRAINAG E & EROSION CONTRO L PLAN LIE B ENG INEERING COMPANY ALABAMA LI CENSED ENG INEER: CHRISTOPHER JAY LIEB , P.E. LICENS E NUM BER 31204 1290 MA IN STR EET , SUITE E ALABAMA CERTIFICATE OF AUTH OR IZATION NUMBER: 4938 FAIRHOP E, AL DAP HNE N.... 36526 OWN ER: VENN ER. LLC PH: (25 1), 978 -9779 r--J-08_N_U_MB_E_R -,,-RA-WN-BY-, -J-LG--D-A-TE-, -,/-J3-/2-2--SC_A_LE-, -,-.~-,-0,----j-SH_EIT_N_UM_B_ER--,--------------,-----, C7.0 2022 -103 CHECKED BY· ___Q_L_ APPROVED BY· ___Q_l ENGR: __i.,Jl_ OF 10 CERTlFl CA TE OF APPROVA L OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOP E PL ANN ING CO MM ISS ION ~;N:iiiit,iciM1;;;IS~~-IS HEREB Y APPROYED SY T11E FAIRHOP E CITY ,cc CER TIFICATE OF APPROVA L CITY ENG INEER THE UNDERSIGNEO.ASCITY ENQN EEROFT11E CITY OF FAIR HOPE,Al.ABAMA. HEREBY Af'PRO VES THE WI TH INSITE PL.AN FOR THE RECORD INCOF SA ME IN i~~ PROBATE OFFI CE OF BALDWIN COON TY. ALAB1~\1HIS WATER : POW ER: SEWER: REVIS IONS ISSU ED FOR INFORMATI ON CfR TIFICAJE OF APPRQYAI AT&T l\l o.NDSIQO,ASAIJHJl?ro8Y•TlT f£1tEB"rll'l'RO',BlllUtll ~TI PU,N fUIRl:CCMlNGCf Hs,,,,,(~lllFffl!.\!I Cff(:[(fBAlDllf<CWITY FAIRHCJ'E PIJ8LI CU T1LJ T1ES($EWER) TIC-ASNJlllatllEIIBY rlllHHl'UUCLITlJlES~E8'Yll'l'RO',B ll(lll)lljST[Pl/,N f(JIR[C(JIOJ(;(fll(SAICll lll f'R(:eli((ff(:[(f Bl<Dlll~co.NTY. FAIRHOPE PUB IJC UJJ IITI ES {WA TER)· HlN:lRSIXll.ASAI.IT\Kf:IZ!DB'Y fi.m:P[f'la.tUTlJTlSIUE8Yll'f'RG'l£S H lllffj 3TE PU« rtJI ,u:ao«; Cf"lll WIE ~ H PRC8/I.TE CfflCI (f -co.NTY. FAI RHOPE PIJ BLIC UTl UTIES{ELECTRI C) H~ASIIJT\Kf:IZ!DBl"fl.RH(J>[f'\B.tUTlJTlS IUE8Yll'l'RO',B ff lllffj ~TE PU«rtJl,u:ao«;(f lll'WIEII HPID!ATE(fflCI(f !IM.l)llllco.NTY. UllNilA.THS H _(f ___ a _ '-,_J UTILIT Y PROVIDERS 62023 FAIRHOP E PUB LI C UTILI TIES FAIRHOP E PUB LI C UTILI TIES FAIRHOP E PUB LI C UTILI TIES TH IS IS TO CERTIFY TH AT I. CLI NT MA.RTIN. "5 T11E OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN Al'-/D OESCR IBEO IN THE SITE PLAN .Al'-ID THAT I HA\IE C...USEO THE SAM E TO BE SU RI/EYED Ai'-10 SUBDMDED "5 INO IC...TED HEREI N. FOR THE USES mo PU RPOS E HEREIN SET FORTH AND 00 HEREBY AC KNOWLEDGE ANO ADOPT THE SAM E UNOER THEDESIGN A.NO TITLEHEREON INOIC...TEO; ANO GRANT ALL EASEMENTS Ai'-10 DEDIC ATE ALL STREETS. ALLEYS. WALKS. PAA:KSANOOTHEROPENSP/\CES TOPUBLICORPRIVATE US E "5NOTEO ~~k~:i I:rr~ £~i~~~~~Kl~t"MDE~OVENANTS NOTED BELOW OR DATED TH IS THE ____ DAY OF ___ _ CERTIFJ CATIQN BY NOTARY PUBI IC STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTYOF 8A.L.DWIN ~~;T c~~~ ~~rtfwJ~BI~;~~o~i~;: i=l~~ j~~~ OWNERSHIP ANO DEDIC ATI ON. APPEARED BEFORE ME 111IS DAY IN ~~~~r;rr€!~l~~~:i:+~i\fi!~~0 ~~~ ~ FOR GIVENUNDER MY HANOANO NOTAAIAL SEAL TH IS THE ___ QAY OF 20 __ . CJD I RECOR D PROPER TY DESCR IPTION; BEGINN ING AT THE SOU IBEAST CORN ER OF LOT 2, HOWARD SUB Dlv1S ION, AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 11. PAGE 68 IN IBE RECORDS OF T11E OFFI CE OF Tl-1E ~OGE OF PROBATE OF B ALDWIN COUN TY, ALAB AMA: THENC E RU N SOU TH 00 DEGR EES 09 MINU TE S 53 SECONDS WES T. 181.35 FEET TO A POINT: IBENCE RUN SOU TH 89 DEGREE S 45 MINUTE S 32 SECONDS WES T. 144.56 FEET TO A PO INT; THEN CE RUN NORTH 00 DEGR EES 17 MINU TE S 29 SECONDS EAST. 181 .89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOU TH UNE OF T11E AFOR ESAID LOT 2, HOWARD SUBD IVISION: THEN CE RU N NORTH 89 DEGR EES 58 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE SA ID SQU IB LI NE OF LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 144.1 6 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINN ING. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATI ON: STATE OF ALABAMA. COUN TY OF BA LDWI N I. ~$TI N PA LME R, A LI CENSED PRO FE SSJONA L SURVEYOR IN BA LDWIN COUN TY, ALABAMA, HEREB Y CER TIFY TH AT ALL PA RTS OF TH IS PLAT AND ORA'M NG HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN AC CORDANCE 'M TH THE CU RRENT REQU IREMEN TS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTI CE FOR LANO SUR VE't'1NG IN THE STATE OF ALAB AMA TO Tl-1E BEST OF MY KNO WLEDGE, INFORMA TI ON AND BELI EF. ~STIN PALMER,PLS AL.LI CENSE N0.34934 CERTIFICATE OF AUTH OR IZA TI ON -1073 -LS THE WOOO LANOS GROUP LLC 22881 US HWY, 98 FAIRHOP E, AL 36532 PHON E: 251-929-4774 =====□--- I D ~----~---~-------~--- ( ) S9"9V 3 .. 8£.60.00 N I 111 __ ---X _ill)_ l09 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 17 PROJECT NARRATI VE: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF DEV[LOP ING AN [MPTY LOT INTO TWO OFFI CE BUILDINGS ON 0.6 AC RES. THE ROAD INFRASTRUCTUR E IS SLATED TO BE GRAV EL. THE WATER SUPP LY WILL BE PROV IDED BY FAIRH OP E PU BLI C UTILITIE S. TH[ SEWER WILL 8[ PROV IDED BY FAIRHOP E PU BLI C UTILITI ES. LIEB ENBINEERINB C: 0 " ,11 NT DRAWN BY: ____-!l& 0ATE :-----1.L1.lL1L SCALE: 1"=20' 2022 -103 CHECKED BY· ___Q_L_ APPROVED BY· ___Q_l ENGR: __i.,Jl_ VENN ER DEVELOPM ENT SHEET NUMBER 10 OF 10 0 - PR OJE CT CONTAC T INF ORMA TI ON: OWN ER: VEN NER, LLC 8076-B SPRING RUN DR IVE FA IRHOP E, AL. 36532 EN GINEE R: LIE B ENG INEE RING COMPANY , LLC 1290 MAIN STR EET, S U ITE E DA PHNE, AL 36526 (25 1) 978-9779 CON TAC T: CHRIS LI EB, PE ..s.!.!fil'..E_ THE WOODLAND S GROU P 22873 US HI GHWAY 98, SU ITE I FA IRHOP E, AL. 36532 (251 ) 929-477 4 TOJAL SIT[DATA: ZONING B-2 LOT SIZE: 0.60:t liCRES ?!IOPOSEDBULOl~HE'-HT 20'-6· TOTALGROSS FLOORlv(fJ,; J,464S.F =~Er.!~~= ~f S.f f'ERCEITT/llOFLAAOSCAPNG 52:ii: PllOPOSEDfCFPI.R Kl~SPOTS IB 9 REOOREDfOFP.IRKNGSPOTS; 17.32 10. MEOWIICAL EOO PMOO Wl.L 0C LOCATED AT 'THE REAA OF 'THE BUI LDING ::~~NGRUNDWE F.oJ!HOf'E,.o.L J65J2 TIESITE IS LOCI.TEO IN ZClti E XPEll THE LJ,,TESTFIRMP\!El.GEOB'l'FEi,1.1, C10 .0 ISS UED FOR RE VIE W L x--x --~----1----------~ I _,,-\ \'l- \ ".... I / PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL !:![ 0 IE 10 ILEX X ATTENUATA 'EAST PALATKA EAST PALATKA HOLLY B&B OR CONT 2"CAL e·-10· CJ LN LAGERSTROEMIA IN DICA 'NATCHEZ' 'NAT CHEZ ' CRAPE MYRnE 30GAL •. 0 MA MAGNOLIA VIRGINIANA SYVEETBAY MAGNOLIA B&BOR CONT e·-10· 0 GA THUJA 'GREEN GIANT' GREEN GIANT ARBORVITAE 45 GAL a·-10· so CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT !:![ '!i SB 22 VIBURNUM ODORATISSIMUM SvVEET VIBURNUM 3GAL SOD/SEED CCDE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT !:![ SC □ 12 ,118 SF CYNODON DACTYLON 'TIFWAY 419· TIFWAY 419 BERMUDA GRASS SOD LANDSCAPING PERCENTAGE REQUIREMENTS · Sec. 20.5-4(c) Tota l Site Area: Required Landscape Area (20%): Proposed Landscape Area: LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS -Sec. 20 .5-4 (5) &i_a_d...fro.ru_age.Jl'LemQI)'...lr.e_e_s_ Not applicable Remaining O.utside_Lot.1~.er.ime.ter Nor_th_Boundar_y 1 tree per 30 LF Perimeter @ 144.6 LF = Required Trees: Provided Trees: Eas,t .B.o.undary 1 tree per 30 LF Perimeter @ 181.0 LF = Required Trees: Provided Trees: Sou_tb B_oundary 1 tree pe r 30 LF Perimeter @ 144.5 LF = Required Trees: Provided Trees: West B_o_u_ndary 1 tree per 30 LF Perimeter @ 181.8 LF = Required Trees: Prov ided Trees: f>rk!ng.Alli! 1 tree per 12 spaces @ 18 spaces = Required Parking Trees: Provided Parking Trees: 26,227 s.f. 5,245 s.f. 13,638 s.f. 4.82 trees 5 trees 5 trees 6.03 trees 7trees 7trees 4.82 trees 5 trees 5 trees 6.06 trees 7trees 7 trees 1.S0 trees 2 trees Z trees REMARKS M INIMUM 3 TRUNKS: FUU. HEAD 3 TRUNKS; FULL HEAD FULL TO GROUND SPACING REMARKS 48"o.c. SPACING londscope orchilec\u re landp lonn in g plocemoking Foley, Ala bama ,!! P. 251.948.7181 P 1'._,· J.4A 4023 .; Mob1Ie. Acbomo ~~ ~ ~ Jcdson, Mississippi D ES I G N :,e6,~~::~~,:~:d, P 850.ZOJ.4252 landscape architects WWW was-des ign.com ~©lJ ~~ THESE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED ANO ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Revisions _____________ _ ~ ~ Revisions/ Sub missions _ 05.22.2J ..,cCccrIY_S°'U"BM°"ITT""AL-=------- -06.22.2 ) _IID1~S=ED_P~E_R~Cl~1Y _____ _ --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- C Copyri# 2023 '#>S Design Inc. These documents and their C011tenb ore the property of WAS Design. Mt reprodudioos, misiol'l!I, modifications or UM of these docisnenb without the express writtfl'I consent of WAS Oesgin Is prohibited by low. BC °"'"' ??? Project Uanoger ??? Princip(lt 233 488 -00 1 Project No. 05.22.23 Sheet Title R istrotion A ST "1 ?.' 1 scP.11t- LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN Sheet No. LP200