Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-2020 Planning Commission Agenda PacketPlanning Commission Meeting August 3, 2020 IMPORTANT UPDATE: Please note that as the City is responding to current COVID-19 concerns, it is important to keep members of the public, our Planning Commission, and staff as safe as possible. For that reason, we will conduct the Planning Commission meeting on August 3, 2020 as a remote video conference meeting. We will continue to update https://www.fairhopeal.gov/departments/planning-and-zoning for the latest information. The City of Fairhope Planning Commission will hold a virtual public hearing at 5:00 PM on Monday, August 3, 2020. Microsoft Teams will be utilized to host our virtual meeting. We will strive to meet the intent of the State’s Open Meetings Act under unprecedented circumstances. If you would like your comments to be considered prior to the meeting, please mail comments to the Planning Department at P.O. Box 429, Fairhope, AL 36533, e-mail to planning@fairhopeal.gov or hand deliver to 555 S. Section Street (a drop box is provided in the lobby) by 3:00 PM on Monday, August 3, 2020. To participate during the public hearings you may join by computer or smartphone: Please send a request to planning@fairhopeal.gov. We will send you a calendar invitation and instructions by 3:00 PM on Monday, August 3, 2020. You may also join by telephone at: +1 334-530-5148 Access code: 159 628 371# Please call in 10-15 minutes prior to the 5:00PM start time. If you are unable to participate by either of the methods above, you may submit a written request to planning@fairhopeal.gov, or call (251) 990-0214 and we will do our best to accommodate. As always, our meetings are also live streamed on YouTube. You may follow along with the meeting at https://www.youtube.com/user/cityoffairhope. Our response is changing daily. Please monitor https://www.fairhopeal.gov/departments/planning-and-zoning for the latest information. Karin Wi lson Al©'or UJunal Mt'mhos Kevin G. B.x>ne Roben A. Brown lack Burrell . ACMO lirnnly Conyers )ay R~bln,011 Lisa A. Hank,. M,~lC Cl{yCkrk Deborah A. Smi,h. CPA O!r lr{u.<llrrf 161 Nllnh Section Strw P.O. Drawer 429 Fa irhope, t\labamQ :56533 251-928-2 I 36 2.5J·g28-677b Fax ww,v.foirho~al.gov L Call t o Order 2. Approval of Minutes • July 6, 2020 City of Fairhope Planning Commission Agenda 5:00 PM Council Chambers August 3, 2020 3. Consideration of Agenda Items: A. UR 20 .05 Request of Southern Light, LLC for 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 1,344 linear foot of underground fiber optic cable. The project will run along the west side of N. Section Street and the north side of Volanta Avenue from 801 N. Section Street to 101 Volanta Avenue to service the Fairhope Yacht Club . B. SD 20.30 Public hearing to consider the request of Corinne J. Snyder for plat approval of Ferry Road Estate, a 2-lot minor division. The property is approximately .89 acres and is located the east side of Ferry Road between Keeney Drive and Ferry Road Circle. PPIN #: 317 C. SD 20.31 Public hearing to consider the request of Joey and Janet Langley for plat approval of Dewberry Estates, a 2-lot minor division. The property is approxi mately 3.80 acres and is located on t he north side of Dewberry Lane, at 9781 Dewberry Lane . PPIN #: 56024 D. SD 20.23 Public hearing to consider the request of Eastpark, LLC for Preliminary plat approval of Parkstone Subdivision at Eastpark PUD, a 41-lot division. The property is approximately 12.63 acres and is located on the north side of Parker Road just east of US Hwy. 98. E. SD 20.33 PPIN #: 15985 and 32028 Public hearing to consider the request of Two Hands Design & Development, LLC for Final plat approval of Hill Top Subdivision, Phase One, a 29-lot division. The property is approximately 21.17 acres and is located on the west side of S. Section Street between Twin Beech Road and Battles Road. PPIN #: 19829 H. SD 20.35 Public hearing to consider the request of Red Barn Properties, LLC for plat approval of Bell Family Subdivision, a 2-lot minor division . The property approximately 6.8 acres and is located on the south side of Red Barn Road approximately .3 miles east of County Road 33. PPIN #: 371732 I. SD 20.36 Public hearing to consider the request of Jason Tickle for plat approval of Shiawasena Subdivision, a 2-lot minor division. The property is approximately 3 acres and is located on the west side of Main Street between Chapman Street and Taylor Street. PPIN #: 11586 J. SD 20.37 Public hearing to consider the request of FST Floyd Enfinger for plat approval of Fairhope Farms, a 2-lot minor subdivision. The property is approximately 23 acres and is located on the west side of Thompson Hall Road between Fairhope Avenue and Morphy Avenue. PPIN #: 14632 K. ZC 20.04 Public hearing to consider the request of the City of Fa irhope Planning and Zoning Department for proposed amendments to Article III, Section C. to establish regulations for waterfront lots i n the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Old/New Business 5. Adjourn SECTION ST NVOLAN T A A V FORST E R A V City of FairhopePlanning Commission August 3, 2020 ¯VOLA N T A A V FORS T E R A V NMOBILESTSECTION ST NUR 20.05 - 1,344 Linear Feet Fiber Optic Cable Legend COF Corp. Limits COF Planning Jurisdiction COF Zoning B-3b - Tourist Resort Commercial Service District B-4 - Business and Professional District R-2 - Medium Density Single-Family R-3TH - Townhouse Single Family ¯ ¯ ^ Project Name: Fiber optic cable installation along the west side of N. Section Street and the north side of Volanta Avenue from 801 N. Section Street to 101 Volanta Avenue to service the Fairhope Yacht Club. Site Data: Project Type: Utility Review Jurisdiction: City of FairhopeZoning District: ROWPPIN Number: General Location: Volanta Avenue and N. Section Street Surveyor of Record: Engineer of Record: Southern LightOwner / Developer: City of Fairhope Right-of-WaySchool District: Recommendation: ApprovalPrepared by: Carla Davis 1 UR 20.05 Southern Light – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Request of Southern Light, LLC for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed underground installation of approximately 1,344 linear foot of fiber optic cable. The project will run along the west side of N. Section Street and the north side of Volanta Avenue from 801 N. Section Street to 101 Volanta Avenue to service the Fairhope Yacht Club. Comments: The proposed utility construction falls within the Corporate limits of Fairhope. The comments below are typical general comments for City of Fairhope right-of-way projects. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the Baldwin County Highway Department or ALDOT. This application has been reviewed by the Planning Department as well as the Public Works and Utilities departments. GENERAL COMMENTS No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. SUPERINTENDENT AND DEPARTMENT HEAD COMMENTS The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities. Public Works Standard Comments: • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of Heritage Trees (as defined by the Tree Ordinance). • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within a tree dripline, consult with the City of Fairhope Horticulturist before proceeding with earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. The applicant shall provide drawings locating their utilities with other utilities and the sidewalks. Any boxes/handholes cannot be placed in the sidewalk. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate work with Richard D. Johnson, PE, Public Works Director, to resolve any potential conflicts. All conduit/cable shall be placed at depth from existing grade per industry and/or County Standards. A minimum horizontal and/or vertical clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from stormwater and utility infrastructures. No handholes, boxes, or other above ground infrastructure shall be installed within drainage easements. Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency. No grade change shall result from the utility installation. The applicant is to avoid any tree drip lines with handholes and equipment. The material under the sidewalk shall be compacted and the repair work shall be to the satisfaction of the Building Official or his designated representative. The applicant shall contact the Building Department for inspection prior to placing concrete. Code Enforcement Officer’s Standard Comments: • The applicant, or subcontractor, shall obtain a ROW permit from the City of Fairhope Building Department prior to beginning work. • Subcontractors shall have a current business license with the City of Fairhope and shall have a copy of the ROW permit available for review at all times, and shall be posted on site or in the window of contractor’s vehicles. 2 UR 20.05 Southern Light – August 3, 2020 • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day and disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Sod shall be watered as needed to ensure survival. • Inlets shall be protected. • If site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), no red soils/clay are allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. Building Official’s Standard Comments: • BMP’s shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • All plans and permits shall be available for review at all times along with the City of Fairhope permit application. • If required, appropriate ALDOT or Baldwin County Highway Department permits shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a right-of-way (ROW) permit. • Contractor is advised to review and comply with the Building Official’s best practices flyer. Water and Sewer Standard Comments: • All existing utilities must be located, and proper separation shall be maintained between utilities. • All mechanical equipment shall be screened by painting the equipment Munsell Green. Natural Gas Standard Comments: • Contractor shall pothole and give clearance between their utilities and the gas lines. Right-of-Way Comments: • Provide traffic control for project: Please include traffic control for all phases of work whether a single lane closure, or shoulder work. • Notify effected homeowners 24 hours prior to beginning project. May also use door hangers with specified date, time and duration of proposed work. The applicant is advised of the following: • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department or other applicable jurisdiction (permit not valid until paid for and picked up by contractor). • The ROW permit shall be kept with the contractor or subcontractor at all times during site work. The ROW permit shall be posted on the job site or in the window of contractor(s) vehicle. • All contractors/subcontractors are subject to City of Fairhope Business License procedures. This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: 1. City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands. 2. City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas. 3. City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398). State and Federal permits shall be on file with the City of Fairhope Building Department, prior to the issuance of City of Fairhope permits. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of UR 20.02 conditional upon the following: 1) The applicant shall follow the general comments related to utility work, as stated above. 3 UR 20.05 Southern Light – August 3, 2020 2) Applicant and applicant’s contractor shall follow the Right of Way Installation Permitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. JULY 13, 2020APPROVED:FAIRHOPE YACHT CLUBFAIRHOPE-101 VOLANTA AVENUE - FAIRHOPE, ALFIBER OPTIC INSTALLATIONPLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT:AERIAL FIBERUNDERGROUND FIBEREISTING ̀VICINITY MAPDAP+NESILVER+ILLT+EODORE+OUSTONVILLEJOB INFORMATIONDATE:JOB #UNDERGROUND CONDUIT:AERIAL:TOTAL FIBER:CPE-321510EST - 0' / ACT - EST. - 1,644' / ACT. - RPROJECT LOCATION06/08/20 FYC-01 UG - N SECTION ST / CR 98BRANDON W+IG+AM - 251 09-49TRAY MORGAN - 205 ̀86-4898MELANIE PILT= - 251 644-4444JANNA BLANC+ARD - 251 422-14CONTACT LISTAS-BUILTDESCRIPTIONDWG. NAMEDIRECTORYATTENTION PERMITTING DEPARTMENTPROJECT MANAGER:ENGINEER:PROJECT CONTACT:CPE LOCATION: +TTPS://UNITI.LIG+TNING.FORCE.COM/LIG+TNING/R/CPEBLOCATIONBBC/A08A000000POA+GAAA/VIEW06/08/20 FYC-02 UG - VOLANTA AVE06/08/20 FYC-03 UG - VOLANTA AVEEST. - 1,344' / ACT. - i , S!. James E~..:opal cn,.1r1;:n al'ICI School .f ....... J ... ' Go..gle F .. Ctiurcl,o1t I l. 0 southern light ,_ "~-1 , __ -f---·, -·-l "''"' ft!l,ip, W""!.M G~ """"It I w.:.. -I --l --,,._,, ..... r .. 1 .,..,, II Clfi' --.-, ..... "'' ... , ,_' ,_ ],_ ~-~ 1 """' \,_.18'n.i'I ,_ n..• ~ ___,.,,. ... ,--I I.._. I <-l ,_ --· I -, c-• ~ Cl.ii-I ._._ ,c-.-..... ....._ ~ END PROJECTFAIRHOPE YACHT CLUBFAIRHOPE-101 VOLANTA AVENUE - FAIRHOPE, ALFIBER OPTIC INSTALLATIONPLANS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT:DAP+NESILVER+ILL T+EODORE +OUSTONVILLEBig Mouth Gull Eastern Shore q St James Episcopal Church and School Fairhope Boat 9 IIOla11r 11Ave -0 \ t;; % ~ .,.,.. 8 ~ ~ S&,i. 'IIOI <'Ave The Coffee Loft 9 "1tl/e,-A ... (' 8"1-Cl IIJ'Ayl.' Rosa Ave Ar ffi) Freet. l.'r/C/,;A -0 \ ~ % ~ Gt .. Go gle ve ~ ~ j i ,, ~ :, :, !;' 0 C ~ ,... i Homestead Ave Washington or fl Q 2. IL !;' Fail Church of< Fairways of Fairhope I L JECT Fairhope fill Recreation Center ... Fairhope City Parks & Rec !i2 .. :, 1 'lt._o, Greenwood Ave Ced.ir Ave Olive Ave Holly~ z S" C, .. !I!. CL ,. !!l Audubon Pl S150'PROPOSED POLE ANCHORPLACE STORE SLACKEXISTING STORE SLACKEXISTING UTILITIES POLEMOVE EXISTING STORE SLACKEXISTING GAS/ WATER METEREXISTING STREET LIGHT POLEEXISTING COMM PEDESTALTEL LINEEXISTING GAS/ SEWER/ WATER VALVEEXISTING UTILITY MARKER EXISTING GUARDRAIL150'S/WTELTEL150'150'EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING ELECTRIC VAULTEXISTING TRANSFORMERWSGEXISTING STORM DRAINEXISTING CATV MANHOLETVEXISTING COMM MANHOLEEXISTING SAN/SEW MANHOLEPTEXISTING POWER MANHOLEPROPOSED BORE PITPROPOSED HANDHOLEEXISTING HANDHOLESEC = SECONDARY POWERPWR = PRIMARY POWERTEL = TELEPHONEF.O. = FIBER OPTIC CABLECATV = CABLE TELEVISIONTRI = TRIPLEX(MR/RQ: MOVE TO ??' ?")XARM = POWER CROSSING ARMTRANS = TRANSFORMERAT&TAT&TAT&T LINETREENORTH ARROWFOG = FOG LINEBOC = BACK OF CURBEOP = EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING GROUND AT POLELASH TO EXISTINGEXISTING CULVERTROW = RIGHT OF WAYMATCHLINEH/L = HOT LEG= MAKE READYYD.LT. = YARD LIGHTST.LT. = STREET LIGHT EXISTING STORM SEWER M.H.TRAFTRAFP/LSWRSWRWTRWTRCOMMCOMMDRAINDRAINCATVCATVGASGASPWRPWRHWHWPROPOSED POLEEXISTING STEEL OR CONCRETE POLEREF # 1-6APCO - N/AID # N/AH/L - 30' +SL FO ATTACH - 22' 9"ST. LT. - 29' 2"CATV - 22' 4"TEL - 21' 4"(MR/RQ: MOVE TO ??' ?")D/WSD/W WITH CULVERTSL FO = SOUTHERN LIGHT FIBER CABLES/L = SOUTHERN LIGHTWATERFIBER OPTIC TOWERWATER TOWERSTORM DRAINSTORM DRAINCSEST =ACT =C&R ASPHALT00EST =ACT =C&R SIDEWALK00ADDRESS REFEXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHTEXISTING TRAFFIC CABINETHHEXISTING UTILITY HANDHOLE4'x4'x5'BORE PITEXISTING MONITOR WELLEXISTING COMM CABINETEXISTING TRAFFIC HAND HOLEEXISTING COMM HANDHOLEPROPOSED CUT/REPAIR ACTIONWGSIDEWALKHOT WATER LINETOE OF SLOPECABLE TV LINETRAFFIC LINEPROPERTY LINEDRAIN LINECOMM LINEWATER LINESEWER LINEGAS LINEPOWER LINESTORM DRAIN LINECENTER LINEROW LINE10041-GMMP ARROWTRAFFIC ARROWSC/L = CENTERLINEMATCH LINEJOB-#DSDGWCPCULVERT PROFILEDRAINCOMMWATERSEWERGASPOWERSTORM DRAIN TOSTOS36"x24"x36"150' SLACKPL. H.H.36"x24"x36"150' SLACKEXIST. H.H.FENCE LINERAILROAD TRACKSOTHER FIBER OPTIC CABLEFIBERFIBERFIBERPROPOSED UNDERGROUND FIBER OR DUCTPROPOSED AERIAL FIBER OR STRANDPROPOSED GUY WIREUNDERGROUND D !TRANSi 0 [a D D □ □ r-, I HH I L-.J UNDERGROUND □ 0 [><] [><] [><] 0 0 0 0 0 ---< ---jll () AERIAL /""\_Q \ I ABBREVIATIONS UTILITIES -EXISTING/PROPOSED UTILITY PROFILES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I 11 I I I 11 I I I 11 I I I 11 ~ TEXT BLOCK COMPLETE MISC. APPLIES TO ALL HANDHOLESPROFILE VIEWHANDHOLE CONDUIT TERMINATION NATIVE SOILSELECT FILLSUBGRADE6" - 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK4-1.25" HDPE CONDUITS1.5'1'VARIESCONC LID.HANDHOLENON-SLIPWIRE MESHEXPANSION BOARD1. PLACE 6" OF 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK OR 3/8" PEA GRAVEL IN THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION.2. HANDHOLE WILL BE SET TO MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK GRADE AND PARALLEL WITH CURB ANDSTREET.3. HDPE CONDUIT SHALL BE PLACED IN THE CORNERS OF HANDHOLE.4. TERMINATE THE HDPE CONDUIT A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES ABOVE THE ROCK. DO NOTTERMINATE HDPE CONDUIT MORE THAN EIGHT (8) INCHES ABOVE THE ROCK.5. A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) FEET OF TRACER SHALL BE IN EACH HANDHOLE.6. SELECT FILL WILL BE EITHER FLOWABLE FILL OR CLEAN SAND AS REQUIRED BY PERMITTINGOFFICIAL .7. FILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS AS PER STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.8. BEARING WEIGHT LIMIT 20,000 POUNDS.CONTACT Southern Light: 877-652-2321ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LOCATINGPRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED.office: 251.662.1170 fax: 251.662.1297107 St. Francis St. - Suite 1800Mobile, AL 36603www.slfiber.com3/8-16 UNC S.S. CAPTIVE HEX HEAD BOLT 2 PLACES ~ PM2436CL501KC4 POLYMER CONCRETE COVER 5/8 [16] X 4 [102] PULL SLOT 2 PLACES <8 ["' 3; r30]1 S.S. INSERT PM243636GSY STEEL CROSS MEMBER DATE: 1-'IION II 1IIS DCICUIDI IS -ETMY MD SIWJ. 11111' IE USED, COPIED, -,cm OI DISCLOSED II 11101.E OI II 1'11111' WIIHOUI' Wlll1DI CGIISEIIT ... -.. REVISIONS O southern light HH SPEC . . . SCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE: INDEX REF.: HHSPEC-CV ENG: DRAWN BY: ROUTE SCHEM.: NA SPLICEDWG.: N A DWG.NO: HHSPEC-1 REFERENCE FISCAL SHEET SPECIAL MATERIALS · CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO YEAR NO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE !BMP> DRAWING PLAN SYMBOL REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT USAGE GUIDELINES NUMBER REFERENCES REFERENCES A TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN WITH RIPRAP DITCH CHECK ANO SUMP EXCAVATION IS CONSTRUCTED WITH A [Ill]~ 665.02. FLE XIBLE PIPE DR CONDUIT EXTENDING FROM THE TOP TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN PIPE WITH ROCK ESC-200-2 801. 810. 814 665.03. OF A CUT OR FILL SLOPE INTO AN EXCAVATED SEDIMENT ~I ALD0T LIST 11-3 665.04, TRAPPING SUMP WITH A ROCK DITCH CHECK DOWN DITCH CHECK ANO SUMP EXCAVATION 665.05 SLOPE OF THE SUMP, THE PURPOSE OF THE TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN IS TO CONVEY ST0RMWATER RUNOFF DOWN THE FACE OF THE SLOPE WITHOUT CAUSING EROSION ON THE SLOPE. A TEMPORARY EARTH BERM CONSISTS OF A CHANNEL ) ) ) ) 665.02 665.03. CONSTRUCTED ACROSS A SLOPE ANO BACKED ON THE TEMPORARY EARTH BERM ESC-200-2 665.04, LOWER SIDE BY AN EARTHEN RIDGE. THE TEMPORARY 665.05 EARTH BERM JS USED TO REDUCE SLOPE LENGTH ANO DIVERT RUNOFF TO STABILIZED OUTLETS SUCH AS A TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN PIPE. BRUSH BARRIERS ARE TEMPORAR Y SEDIMENT TRAPPING STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED AT THE PERIMETER OF BRUSH BARRIER ................................................................................................................................................ 665.02 665.03. DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE MADE FROM RESIDUE OF LANO ESC-200-3 ///./././/././/././././././/./ 665.04, CLEARING AND GRUBBING. BRUSH BARRIERS CONTROL OFF 665.05 SITE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENTS UNTIL STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREAS CAN BE ACHIEVED. A SILT FENCE SEDIMENT BARRIER CONSIST OF AN ENTRENCHED FILTER FABRIC STRETCHED ACROSS ESC-200-3 665.02. 665.03. A WIRE BACKING THAT IS SUPPORTED BY POSTS, SILT FENCE SEDIMENT BARRIER ESC-200-4 --I I I I //-AASHTO M288 665.04, THE PURPOSE OF SILT FENCE SEDIMENT BARRIERS I II AL0DT LIST 11-3 665.05 IS TO INTERCEPT ANO TRAP SEDIMENT AS WELL AS DECREASE RUNOFF VELOCITIES OF SHEET FLOW ANO MODERATE CHANNEL FLOWS . SEDIMENT RETENTION BARRIERS ARE USED AS A PERIMITER II 665.02 665.03 CONTROL MEASURE TO PROVIDE PROTECTION TO CLEAN SEDIMENT RETENTION BARRIER ESC -200-5 I I ASHT0 M288 665.04 WATER RUNNING THROUGH THE PROJECT OR OTHER CRITICAL i ( (/2~ l lf ( l1J ALD0T LIST-3 665.05 AREAS. 7 DITCH CHECKS ARE INSTALLED TO CONTROL RUNOFF VELOCITY ANO THUS REDUCE EROSION DITCH CHEC K STRUCTURES ESC-300-1 SEE SYMBOLS BELOW FOR EACH CHECK STRUCTURE 665.02 665.03. ANO PROVIDE FOR TRAPPING OF SEDIMENTS . 665.04, SELECTION OF THE APPROPRIATE DITCH CHECK 665.05 IS A FUNCTION OF DRAINAGE AREA. DITCH GRADIENT AND SOIL TYPE. HAY BALES ARE USED TD INTERCEPT LOW HA Y BALE DITCH CHECK ESC -300-2 I I I I 665.02 665.03. VOLUME FLOWS IN LOW TO MODERATE . . .. . . 665.04. GRADIENT DI TC HES. 665.05 SANO BAG DITCH CHECKS ARE USED FOR VELOCITY ~ 665.02. 665.03. REDUCTION ANO MINIMAL SEDIMENT TRAPPING IN SAND BAG DITCH CHECK ESC-300-3 665.04, CONCRETE PAVED DITCHES OR IN DITCHES THAT 801 HAVE ROCKY BOTTOMS.SANO BAGS MAY ALSO BE 665.05 USED AS A SEDIMENT BARRIER ON HARD SURFACES. ~ 665.02. 665.03. WATTLE DITCH CHECKS ARE APPROPRIATE FOR AL00T LIST ll-24 665.04. VELOCITY REDUCTION ANO CONTROL OF SEDIMENT WATTLE DITCH CHECK ESC-300-4 665.05. TRANSPORT UNDER LOW TO MEDIUM FLOW MANUFACTURER CONDITIONS. LITERATURE 665.02, 665.03, SILT DIKE DITCH CHECKS CAN BE USED IN DITCHES WITH CONCENTRATED FLOWS SILT DIKE DITCH CHECK ESC-300-5 [) <l MANUFACTURER 665.04, WITHIN THE CLEAR ZONE WHERE RIPRAP LITERATURE 665.05. CAN NOT BE USED. --SPECIFICATIONS-- MANUFACTURER CURRENT ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LITERATURE THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS DESIGNS PREPARED FOR USE BY THE ALABAMA DEPARTUENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND IS NOT TO BE COPIED, REPRODUCED, AL TEREO, OR USED BT ANYONE. OR ROCK DITCH CHECKS ARE USED PRIMARILY IN ANY ORGANIZATION. WITHOUT THE [)(PRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ALA8AiMA OEPAiRTMENT ~ HIGH VELOCITY AND LARGE VOLUME DITCH FLOW OF TRANSPORTATION REPRESENTATIYE AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE THIS USE. ANYONE l,UKING 665.02. 665.03, CONDITIONS TO REDUCE EROSION AND TRAP MINIMAL UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THIS DRAWING MA Y BE PROSECUTED TO THE FIA.LEST EXTENT OF THE LAW. ROCK DITCH CHECK ESC -300-6 801. BIO. Bl4, 665.04. VOLUMES OF SEDIMENT.AGGREGATE DITCH CHECKS BWilllllS ~ PLAN NOTE 665.05 CAN BE USED ONLY IN LOW VELOCITY FLOWS AND '· Updated Cho"t on Ol•ll•U by JJ.1. 'l ALABAMA DEPARTMENT ALD0T LIST 11-3 ,. Rnlsed gnd Updahd Chort °" SERVE AS EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT TRAPS. SIZES OF ,. ~~!°;!! ~1Lf;~HC[ OITCH 0£Cl. LW OF TRANSPORTATION ROCK WILL BE DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ESC-lOO 1SK1 I OF ll" and Inserted 1•09 COLISEU~ BOULEVARD "SCOlll£NT R[T[HTION e•RAIEA. [SC•200 MON TGOMERY, Al 36130-3050 tSHT 5 Of St•on 01·10·16 by Jl'.1. CTJI ◄• Updated Soeclol D..-owlrlQ No, from DESICN BUREAU SPECIAL DRAWINC ESC•IOO ISl'E.ET I Of 21 to [SC·IOO·t 665.02. 665.03, ROCK DITCH CHECK WITH SUMP EXCAVATION Cll"l<l otrier• uslnQ so,ne ttottarn ROCK DITCH CHECK by J.f.T.• J.M.M. WITH SUMP EXCAVATION ESC-300-7 BOI, 810. 814. 665.04, CAN BE PLACED IN OI TC HES FOR ON-SITE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE PLAN NOTE 665.05 SEDIMENT TRAPPING. REFERENCE MATRI X AL00T LIST 11-3 Bureau Std Cnor-1 L. V .5. SPEC IAL DAAWIH<i HO INDEX NO DR.UN BYr DATE DRHN. 2006 ESC-100-1 1160 NOT TO SCALE REFERENCE FISCAL SHEET PROJECT NO YEAR NO SPECIAL MATERIALS CONSTRUCT ION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE <BMPl DRAWING PLAN SYMBOL REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT USAGE GUIDELINES NUMBER REFERENCES REFERENCES SILT FENCE DITCH CHECK > 665.02, 665.03, SILT FENCE DITCH CHECKS ARE USED TO ESC-300-8 AASHTO M2BB 665.04, INTERCEPT LOW VOLUME FLOWS IN LOW AL0OT LIST 11-3 665.05 TO MODERATE GRADIENT DITCHES . ~ 665.03, CONFIGURATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED WITH INLET PROTECTION ESC-400-1 665.02 APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER FOR TRAVELWAY 665,04, SAFETY, WATER FLOW. SOIL OR IN STALLATION 665.05 CHALLENGES . THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE REQUIRED 665.02, 665.03, STONE BERM SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FEET AGGREGATE INLET PROTECTION ESC-400-2 * 801 665.04, ABOVE THE ELEVATION OF THE INLET WORKING 665.05 POINT ANO A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BELOW THE ELEVATION OF THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE INSIDE SHOULDER. NOTE, *'· ONLY ONE INLET PROTECTION SYMBOL IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, 665.02, 665.03. WATTLE INLET PROTECTION PROVIDES SEDIMENT CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND SITE CONDITIONS WILL DICTATE 665.04, TRAPPING BY PONDING STORMWATER TO A DEPTH WHICH TYPE OF INLET PROTECTION SHOULD BE INSTAL LED. WATTLE INLET PROTECTION ESC-400-3 * ALD0T LIST 11 ·24 665.05, EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE WATTLE DIAMETER. SAND BAG INLET PROTECTION PROVIDES SEDIMENT 665.02. 665.03, TRAPPING BY PO NDING STORMWATER TO A DEPTH SAND BAG INLET PROTECTION ESC-400-4 * 801 665.04, EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE STACKED HEIGHT. 665.05 NOTE, **I. TEMPORARY DEWATERING STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING. A FLOATING BAS IN BOOM IS A FLOATING IMPERMEABLE ANO TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS USE ANO LOCATION WILL BE AT CONTRACTOR 665.02. 665.03. TE XTILE BARRIER WHICH MINIMIZES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT DISCRETION UNLESS SPECIFICALLY MACE A PART OF THE CONTRACT. FLOATING BASIN BOOM ESC-501 MANUFACTURER 665.04. WITHIN A WATERB0DY AND MAY BE USED FOR UPLAND LITERATURE 665.05, SEDIMENT CONTROL REDUNDANCY . MANUFACTURER LITERATURE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES ARE INSTALLED I ~ 665,02, 665.03. AT POINTS OF VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS . THE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ESC-502 801 665.04, STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES REDUCE THE 665.05 AMOUNT OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORTED ONTO PAVED PUBLIC TRAVEL WAYS BY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ANO OTHER MOTOR VEHICLES. l'lll.I.E.:. TEMPORARY DEWATERING STRUCTURES ARE USED TO * * * 1. SEDIMENTATION BASINS ARE DRAWN TO SCALE ON THE PLANS. 107.13. 107.13, CAPTURE SEDIMENT THAT MAY BE PRESENT IN DEWATERING TEMPORARY DEWATERING STRUCTURE ESC-503 ** CONTRACTOR 524.03 DISCHARGES ANO TO REDUCE DISCHARGE VELOCITY DISCRE TION MANUFACTURER SUFFICIENTLY TO PROTECT DOWN SLOPE AREAS FROM LITERATURE EROSION. FILTER BAGS ARE USED WHEN DISCHARGING POTENTIALLY SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO SENSITIVE WATER BODIES OR IN URBAN AREAS. A TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PROVIDES A MEANS 107.13, I07.13, FOR VEHICLES ANO HEAVY EQUIPMENT TO SAFELY TEMPORARY CULVERT STREAM CROSSING ESC-504 ** CONTRACTOR 107.21 CROSS A WATERCOURSE WHILE MINIMIZING DAMAGE TO DISCRETION STREAMS ANO WETLANDS. AN EXAMPLE IS PROVIDED WHICH MAY BE MODIFIED OR ADOPTED BY THE CONTRACTOR. NOTE : * * ** I. FL0CCULANT TO BE APPLIED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS ARE USED TO DIVERT 107.13. ID7.13. STREAM FLOW AROUND CONSTRUCTION WORK UNTIL TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS ESC-505 ** CONTRACTOR I07.21. PERMANENT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE COMPLETED. ESC-506 DISCRETION 524.03 665.03. 665.02. 665.04, 659.02, 860.11 665.05. SEDIMENTATION BASINS ARE USED TD REDUCE SEDIMENTATION BASIN ESC-507 *** ALD0T LIST 11·11 MANUFACTURER TURBIDITY OF CONSTRUCTION STDRMWATER ALD0T LIST 11-2 ◄ LITERATURE RUNOFF CURING GRADING. --SPECIFICATIONS -· CURRENT ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 665.02. 665.03. 672.02 672.03, FL0CCULANT IS USED TO REDUCE TURBIDITY THl5 DRAWING REPRESENTS DESIGNS PREPARED FOR USE BY THE ALABAM' DEPARTMENT OF' FLOCCULANT **** OF CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF TRANSPORTATION ANO IS NOT TO BE COPIED, REPRODUCED, AL TEAED, OR USED BY ANYONE , OR ESC-508 ALD0T LIST 11-24 MANUFACTURER ANY ORCANIZATJON, WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT LITERATURE DURING GRADING. OF TRANSPORTATION REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE THIS USE. ANYONE MAKING UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THIS DRAWING MAY BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW . BWSlll!!S (I) ,. Uodoted Chart on 01-23-11 b)' J.l.l. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT ,. UOOOted ChOl"t Un. p01ltlonln9 on EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS ARE USED TD PROTECT 01·24•12 by J,r,t, OF TRANSPORTATION SLOPES ANO CHAN NE LS. EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS ,. Uodot<td, R•vlnd Chert a"ld 000.d 1409 COLISEUU BOULEVARD 659.02, 659.03, .... Note on 10-20-14 Dy J.F.T. ~ ARE USED TO CREATE CONDITIONS THAT ASSIST THE '· Added s,dlinent R•t-,tlon 80r"rler MONTCOMERY, AL 361]0~3050 860.11. 659.04. ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATION . LOCATIONS SHOWN 10 inotrl• on 10·2·1S by L.v.s. ESC-509 659.05 s. Reoloced "S[DJl,l(kT RETENTION BAIIRIEA. 0ESICN BUREAU SPECIAL 0RAWINC EROSION CO NTR OL PRODUCTS AL00T LIST 11-11 ON PLANS SHOULD BE BASED ON GRADIENT. SOIL, ESC•200 ISKT 5 Of S)" cnCI lnHrted ~ILT FU«:£ DITCH CHECK., ESC·]OO tSHT 8 LONGEVITY ANO HYDROLOG Y. EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS .. Of 81 ' on 01·10·16 tty J.f.T. WILL GENERALLY BE REQUIRED ON 2H:IV OR STEEPER SLOPE Upc,ot•d Sc,ec:lal OrcralnO No. from BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE ESC•IOO ISHEET 2 Of 21 to ESC·IOO·l end LENGTHS MORE THAN 15 FEET. ot~• uslne ac,r,-po'ttern J.f.T. • J.M.M.. REFERENCE MATRIX SPECIAL DRHIMG NO INDEX NO Bureou Std ["'9(1 __ ESC-100-2 1160-A DRAWN BY1 DATE ORAWN1 2006 NOT TO SCALE SWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGASGASGASGASGASGASGREEN GATES80' 40'40' 25' 10' 40' 10'10'10' 14' 1' 14'13'9' 5'EX SL UGEX SL UG SWRSWRSWRSWRSWR15' 25'2'4'5'3'1'6'0'7'8'9'2'4'5'3'1'6'0'7'8'9'CONTACT Southern Light: 877-652-2321ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LOCATINGPRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED.RIILFH: 251.662.110 ID[: 251.662.12910 SW. FUDQFLV SW. - SXLWH 1800MRELOH, AL 36603ZZZ.VOILEHU.FRPFAIRHOPE, ALDEPTH TO BE A MINIMUM OF 60" BELOW GRADE2 - 1.25Ԁ+DPE5' MIN FIBERCABLESOUT+ERN LIG+T WILL MAINTAIN 24 FROM E;ISTING UTILITIES.SOUT+ERN LIG+T +AS LOCATED ALL E;ISTING UTILITIES.AN E;TENSIVE LOCATE WILL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.PULL FIBERDIR. BORE 2-1.25"ROW- EX. HH0+00 - BORE PIT1+03PROPOSED HDPEBELOW GRADESHEET FYC-2SHEET FYC-1EST = 253'EST = 103'2-1.25" HDPE96ct FIBERROWEOPC/LEOPROWROWEOPC/LEOPROW ROW EOP C/L EOP ROW ROW EOP C/L EOP 36"x24"x36"150' SLACKEXIST. H.H.DIG 4'x4'x5'BORE PITNOTE: ALL UTILITIES TO BEPOT+OLED DAY OF E;TRACTION.E;TRACT ELEVATIONS TO BERECORDED FOR REDLINES.Notes:1) Homeowners to be notified 24 hours prior to construction with door hangers specifying date, time, and duration of work.2)Proposed line shall not be installed over the top of City of Fairhope's gas main.3)Proposed line will maintain a minimum horizontal 6' from existing utilities.4) All utilities will be crossed at a 90 degree vertical angle.5) All junction boxes will be installed parallel to the street.6)Erosion Control:a. Disturbed areas shall be covered at the end of each day.b. Mulch/seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover.c. Sod shall be installed on disturbed areas of the right of way as final cover, within 10 days of completion of project.d. Sod shall be watered in to ensure survival.I J N SECTION ST / CR 98 T T 1/ ~ --½ ~ ~ ~ ij ~ lilli,,.. ij ~ UNDERGROUND ALL CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED DATE: REVISIONS L __ ( END VIE1f OF BORE INf'OIIIIATION IN MS DOCUMENT IS PROPIIETAR'I AND SHAU. NOT BE USED, COPIED, REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED II WIICI.E OR 11 PAR'I W11HOU1 WR111EN CONSENT CWSoalhnl.lghl y~~~W.:f O southern light • FAIRHOPE YACHT CLUB FAIRHOPE-101 VOLANTAAVENUE • • SCALE: NTS PROJ. NO.: CPE-321510 DATE: 6/52020 INDEX REF.: FYC-CV ENG: T,M0RGAN DRAWN BY: C.CHAMBERS VERSION: 5. 1.20 SPLICE DWG.: N A DWG. NO: FYC-1 WINDWARDVILLAGEWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGREEN GATES125 / 12312111P25'15'10' 21' 18' ' 19' 1' 1' 21' 6'18'13'13'14'SWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWR9' 9' 9' 18' 10'10' 20'23'23' 33'33' 66' 5' 'WTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRCOMMCOMMCOMMCOMMCOMMGASGASGASGASGASGASWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGASGASGASGASGASGASPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWR20'SWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWR5' 5'CONTACT Southern Light: 877-652-2321ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LOCATINGPRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED.RIILFH: 251.662.110 ID[: 251.662.12910 SW. FUDQFLV SW. - SXLWH 1800MRELOH, AL 36603ZZZ.VOILEHU.FRPFAIRHOPE, ALDEPTH TO BE A MINIMUM OF 60" BELOW GRADE2 - 1.25Ԁ+DPE5' MIN FIBERCABLESOUT+ERN LIG+T WILL MAINTAIN 24 FROM E;ISTING UTILITIES.SOUT+ERN LIG+T +AS LOCATED ALL E;ISTING UTILITIES.AN E;TENSIVE LOCATE WILL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.PULL FIBERDIR. BORE 2-1.25"0'0'4'8'10'6'2'12'14'16'18'4'8'10'6'2'12'14'16'18'- POLE1+20PROPOSED HDPEBELOW GRADESHEET FYC-3 SHEET FYC-2 SHEET FYC-1SHEET FYC-2 ROWSPEEDLIMIT 25EST = 759'EST = 759'2-1.25" HDPE96ct FIBER- BORE PIT0+00 EOPROWEOPC/LROWROW- PARKING LOT0+19- PARKING LOT1+14 - D/W1+43 - D/W1+72 - D/W5+35 - D/W5+57 - D/W6+37 - D/W6+54 - D/W7+17 - D/W7+35 - D/W7+42 - D/W7+59S- SEWER LINE0+99 - TRANSFORMER1+84 - TRANSFORMER4+58 - CULVERT4+40 - CULVERT5+60 / POWER HH(2) COMM PEDS - CULVERT6+33 S- SEWER LINE6+45 NOTE: ALL UTILITIES TO BE POT+OLED DAYOF E;TRACTION. E;TRACT ELEVATIONS TOBE RECORDED FOR REDLINES.W- GAS LINE0+28 P/ POWER LINE W- WATER LINE4+95 CG- GAS LINE6+59 W- WATER LINE6+68 S- SEWER LINE7+40 G- GAS LINE7+60 / LINE □ co 0) l::t:j u ' E-< 00 z 0 ~ u r.:::I 00 z /. 'l / '/ 1/✓ / ""--.... UNDERGROUND L -+ LoU-., •• .... _ .. ,,. '-......_ 1111,,._ ALL CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED D/W r D/W 1 · .. ••• ,._y ',k•'-..• ~---= ....... ,, ·= irl~i'I ~y C ' --VOLANTA AVE ~ ,..._ ,..._ '-' '-' ~ ,,,.. DATE: =~ fr ~, ~ .1/1 " REVISIONS ~ .J ~ INFOIIIIATION IN 111S DOCUMENT IS PROPIIETAR'I AND SHAU. NOT BE USED, COPIED, REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED II WIICI.E OR 11 PAR'I W11HOU1 WR111EN CONSENT CWSoalhnl.lghl END VIE1f OF BORE ~ ~ Qt! -\,,J O southern light • FAIRHOPE YACHT CLUB FAIRHOPE-101 VOLANTAAVENUE • • SCALE: NTS PROJ. NO.: CPE-321510 DATE: 6/52020 INDEX REF.: FYC-CV ENG: T.M0RGAN DRAWN BY: C.CHAMBERS VERSION: 5. 1.20 SPLICE DWG.: N A DWG. NO: FYC-2 WTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS11115113109111YACT CLUB─10'10' 20'23'23' 33'33' 66' 18' 19' 11' ' 12' 12' 9' 5'GASGASGASGASGASSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRPWRCOMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMM COMMCOMMCOMMCOMMSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRGASGASGASGASGASWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRWTRSWRSWRSWRSWRSWRGASGASGASGASGAS5' 5'CONTACT Southern Light: 877-652-2321ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LOCATINGPRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED.RIILFH: 251.662.110 ID[: 251.662.12910 SW. FUDQFLV SW. - SXLWH 1800MRELOH, AL 36603ZZZ.VOILEHU.FRPFAIRHOPE, ALDEPTH TO BE A MINIMUM OF 60" BELOW GRADE2 - 1.25Ԁ+DPE5' MIN FIBERCABLESOUT+ERN LIG+T WILL MAINTAIN 24 FROM E;ISTING UTILITIES.SOUT+ERN LIG+T +AS LOCATED ALL E;ISTING UTILITIES.AN E;TENSIVE LOCATE WILL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.PULL FIBERDIR. BORE 2-1.25"0'0'4'8'10'6'2'12'14'16'18'4'8'10'6'2'12'14'16'18'- CULVERT8+92 - COMM PED12+37PROPOSED HDPEBELOW GRADESHEET FYC-2SHEET FYC-3 ROWSPEEDLIMIT 25EST = 632'EST = 482'2-1.25" HDPE96ct FIBER- PLACE HH12+41 EOPROWEOPC/LROWEOPROWEOPC/L- CULVERT9+02 - CULVERT9+95 - CULVERT11+16 - CULVERT11+51 - D/W7+59- D/W7+90- D/W8+10- D/W8+35- D/W8+54 - D/W9+07 - D/W9+24 - D/W9+67 - D/W9+85 - D/W11+21 - D/W11+48 SPEC SHEET150' SLACKPL. H.H.NOTE: ALL UTILITIES TO BEPOT+OLED DAY OF E;TRACTION.E;TRACT ELEVATIONS TO BERECORDED FOR REDLINES./ LINEG- GAS LINE7+60S- SEWER LINE8+69 W- WATER LINE8+86 G- GAS LINE9+05 W- WATER LINE10+09 S- SEWER LINE11+33 G- GAS LINE11+50 P- POWER LINE12+14 C□ i VOLANTA AVE I I -I -,-== :i== }_ ..:j:_ D/W t + . ~... -"""'=""' • .i<•' -• ,i,,• -~ '.i••·-'.i••' -1-~ --e I'-' V '\J ..... "-.. ..._ UNDERGROUND ALL CONSTRUCTION IS PROPOSED DATE: r -r '\J '-8 REVISIONS D/W t :f ~ ~ 1/ ~ 1/, 1/ ~ % _, / INf'OIIIIATION IN 111S DOCUMENT IS PROPIIETAR'I AND SHAU. NOT BE USED, COPIED, REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED II WIICI.E OR 11 PAR'I W11HOU1 WR111EN CONSENT CWSoalhnl.lghl END VIEW OF BORE "''sl~~'<;~~ O southern light • FAIRHOPE YACHT CLUB FAIRHOPE-101 VOLANTAAVENUE • • SCALE: NTS PROJ. NO.: CPE-321510 DATE: 6/52020 INDEX REF.: FYC-CV ENG: T.M0RGAN DRAWN BY: C.CHAMBERS VERSION: 5. 1.20 SPLICE DWG.: N A DWG. NO: FYC-3 CONTACT SOUTHERN LIGHT: 251-662-1170ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LOCATING.PRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED.XXX, ALoffice: 251.662.1170 fax: 251.662.1297107 St. Francis St. - Suite 1800Mobile, AL 36603www.slfiber.com350'500''WORK AREAEOPEOPEOPEOPMAX DISTANCE 25' BETWEEN CONES350'200'CLCLTAPER MAX DISTANCE25' BETWEEN CONESUTILITYWORKAHEADUTILITYWORKAHEADWORK AREALEGENDAHEADWORKROADWORK ZONE SIGNDIRECTION OF TRAFFIC ANDTYPICAL SIGNAGELANE IDENTIFICATION 36" CONESENDUTILITYWORK2' min [) DATE: REVISIONS INf'OIIIIATION IN MS DOCUMENT IS PROPIIETAR'I AND SHAU. NOT BE USED, COPIED, REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSED II WIICI.E OR II PAR'I Wl1HOUI WRll1EN CONSENT CWSoalhnl.lghl. O southern light • • • SCALE: NTS PROJ. NO.: N/A INDEX REF.: N/A ENG: N/A ROUTE SCHEM.: N A SPLICEDWG.: N A TCP ffllPIATIS -AIAIIAIIA ~.:><.:><.:>< DATE: XX/XX/2018 DRAWN BY: N/A DWG. NO: TCP 4A Fairhope Public Utilities Wastewater Department Planning Review Case Number: UR. 20.05 PPIN: N/A Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 Return to planner by: Monday 7/6/2020 Planner: Carla Davis Project Name: Southern Light Project Location: The project will run along the west side of N. Section Street and the north side of Volanta Avenue from 801 N. Section Street to 101 Volanta Avenue to service the Fairhope Yacht Club. Number of Lots: N/A Wastewater In service territory: Yes ___ No ___ Residential ___ Commercial ___ Mixed ___ Main needed on project: Yes ___ No ___ Force ____ Gravity _____ Lift Station Required _____ Main proposed on project: Yes ___ No ___ Size proposed is adequate: Yes ___ No ___ If no, what size main is required: _________________________ Upgrades required to existing system: Yes ___ No ___ If so, what are the upgrades required, main upgrade, new mains, fire hydrants, etc. Any upgrades to the system to meet future needs? If so, what are the upgrades and the incremental costs? Any comments for planner to add to the review for the applicant? The line being laid needs to be a minimum horizontal 6 feet from our existing utilities. All crossing of our existing utilities needs to be at a 90 degree vertical angle and would need to approve these crossings. Any Costs to be paid by Developer? Wastewater review by and Date: Timothy L Manuel Assistant Water and Sewer June 30, 2020 __________________________________________ Fairhope Public Utilities Electric Department Planning Review Case Number: UR. 20.05 PPIN: N/A Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 Return to planner by: Monday 7/6/2020 Planner: Carla Davis Project Name: Southern Light Project Location: The project will run along the west side of N. Section Street and the north side of Volanta Avenue from 801 N. Section Street to 101 Volanta Avenue to service the Fairhope Yacht Club. Number of Lots: N/A Electric In service territory: Yes x No ___ Residential ___ Commercial ___ Mixed __x_ Single Phase __x__ Three Phase ___x__ Project will feed from: Existing Infrastructure adequate, if not what infrastructure is required? Total costs to developer per the standards __________ General Notes for Developer (check if needed) _____ All ROW’s need to be to grade prior to installation of electric _____ All property lines must be clearly marked prior to electric installation _____ Transformers, and other above ground electric equipment must be located within 10’ of road, parking or driveway. ___x__ Any other comments, list below: On the drawings, it shows our electrical services at 2’ and southern light at 5’…Most of our secondary services are at 3-4’ and our primary is at 4-5’. Electric review by and Date: Jeremy Morgan Ca se Numbe r : UR. 20.05 PPIN : N/A Date Submitted : 6/23/2020 Fairhope Publ ic Ut iliti es Ga s Departm ent Planning Re v iew Return to planner by : Monday 7/6/2020 Planner : Carla Davis Project Name: Southern Light Project Location : The project will run along the west side of N. Section Street and the north side of Volanta Avenue from 801 N. Section Street to 101 Volanta Av enue to servlce the Fairhope Yacht Club. Number of Lots: N/A Gas In service territory: Yes _X_ No _ Residential _x_ Commercial Mixed Pr oject will feed from : Loop feed located at: Existing Infrastructure adequate , If not what infrastructure is required ? Tot al costs to developer pe r the standards ___ _ General Notes for Develop er (check if needed ) __ All ROW's need to be to grade prior to i nstallation __ All property lines must be clearly marked prior to electric installation __ All gas to be installed by the City of Fairhope or authorized contra ctor _X_ Any other comments, list below : Ple ase make sure the line is not installed over the top of our gas main . Gas review by and Date : __ Terry Holman 6-26 -2020 _______________ _ From:John Thomas To:Carla Davis; Conrad Havranek; Curtis Cooper; Jay Whitman; Jeremy Little; Jeremy Morgan; Michael Allison; Terry Holman; Tim Manuel Cc:Kim Burmeister; Christina Lejeune; Erik Cortinas; Richard Johnson Subject:RE: UR 20.05 Southern Light Date:Thursday, July 2, 2020 1:25:18 PM Attachments:image002.jpg image003.png Carla, Can you please add the below comments to the review. Provide traffic control for project: Please include traffic control for all phases of work whether a single lane closure, or shoulder work. Notify effected homeowners 24 hours prior to beginning project. May also use door hangers with specified date, time and duration of proposed work. Thank you, John Thomas Right-of-Way Construction Inspector City of Fairhope 555 Section St, Fairhope, AL 36532 Email: john.thomas@fairhopeal.gov Cell: 251-504-1838 Office: 251-279-6232 From: Carla Davis <carla.davis@fairhopeal.gov> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 12:50 PM To: John Thomas <john.thomas@fairhopeal.gov>; Conrad Havranek <conrad.havranek@fairhopeal.gov>; Curtis Cooper <Curtis.Cooper@fairhopeal.gov>; Jay Whitman <Jay.Whitman@fairhopeal.gov>; Jeremy Little <jeremy.little@fairhopeal.gov>; Jeremy Morgan <Jeremy.Morgan@fairhopeal.gov>; Michael Allison <michael.allison@fairhopeal.gov>; Terry Holman <Terry.Holman@fairhopeal.gov>; Tim Manuel <Tim.Manuel@fairhopeal.gov> Cc: Kim Burmeister <kim.burmeister@fairhopeal.gov>; Christina Lejeune <christina.lejeune@fairhopeal.gov>; Erik Cortinas <erik.cortinas@fairhopeal.gov>; Richard Johnson <richard.johnson@fairhopeal.gov> Subject: UR 20.05 Southern Light 0 0 Good Afternoon, Attached you will find the comment response forms for each department’s review. The requested response date to have comments back is 7/6/2020. The plans submitted in the packet are attached as well. Not everyone has a form to return, but after reviewing the plans if you have comments please send those to me as well by the above date. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you and have a great day and an even better weekend! Carla L. Davis, QCI City of Fairhope City Planner 555 S. Section Street P.O. Box 429 Fairhope, Al 36532 (251) 928-8003 carla.davis@fairhopeal.gov [g] 1 SD 20.30 Ferry Road Estates – August 3, 2020 Planning Commission July 6, 2020 2-Lot Minor Subdivision Approval Case: SD 20.30 Ferry Road Subdivision Project Name: Ferry Road Estate Subdivision Property Owner /Applicant: Corinne Snyder General Location: The property is located on the east side of Ferry Road between Keeney Drive and Ferry Road Circle Project Type: Minor Subdivision inside Fairhope’s ETJ Number of lots: 2 Project Acreage: 0.89 Zoning District: Unzoned PPIN Number: 317 Surveyor of record: Moore Surveying, Inc. School District: J Larry Newton, Fairhope Middle, Fairhope High School Report prepared by: Carla L. Davis City Planner Recommendation: Denial N Subject Property N Subject Site 4 .005 17 b R-1 LowOenHy Slngle-Fam•y ITIIIll RH•l 16. ~:::: -R-2 Me<lium OensitySlngle-Fami ly -------; -R-3 Hlg,h Oensty Slngle-Fami y R-3 PGH Patio1Gardef'ls ;,01efaml y ~R-3ThlTowthouseSlngle Famiy -R---oi Low Densfy Mull-l"amlly R-5 Hlg,hOenstyOv.elr10Residentisl -B--1 LocaJShoppingOislrid. B--2 General BusinessD~ri a -B--laToOJri •ResortlodglngDbm<:t -B-Jb Towisl Resort Commercial Se<Vice Disfflct -S---4BusinessandProfessional Olsnct -M-1 Llghllndust,;al01stnct 2 SD 20.30 Ferry Road Estates – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request Corinne J. Snyder owner and applicant for a 2 -lot minor subdivision. The property is located on the east side of Ferry Road between Keeney Drive and Ferry Road Circle. The subject property is approximately 0.89 acres and the applicant desires to divide the property into two separate lots. The proposed Lot 1 is approximately 0.37 acres (16,378 square feet) and the proposed Lot 2 is approximately 0.51 acres (22,368 square feet). This application was heard at the previous June 8, 2020 Planning Commission meeting where it was held over as the lots did not meet the 100’ minimum lot width requirement per the Subdivision Regulations. The applicant is now requesting a waiver of the lot width to reduce the lot width to two, 91’ wide lots. Comments: The subject property is in Fairhope’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction and therefore must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations Article VI Section D requires the provision of sidewalks along all streets in the Planning Jurisdiction of Fairhope. The preliminary plat depicts a 15’ drainage, utility, and sidewalk easement. The applicant has also requested a sidewalk waiver. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements at this time, therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing flow patterns will be changed by this replat. Water and gas services will be provided by the City of Fairhope. Power is supplied by Baldwin County EMC.; and Baldwin County Sewer Service will provide sewer. Waiver Request: Article VI Section D. Sidewalks requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope.” The applicant has provided a letter stating the following regarding the request for a sidewalk and a lot width waiver: On the behalf of the Owner (Corinne J. Snyder) of the property located on the East side of Ferry Road, she is requesting a waiver of the required sidewalk construction along Ferry Road. We have added a 15- foot wide easement along Ferry Road for future sidewalk construction. This request is being asked due to the fact that there are not any sidewalks within miles in all directions of this property. Article V Section E. Lot Size requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “lots not subject to zoning shall have lot areas of not less than 15,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet.” The applicant has provided a letter stating the following regarding the request for a sidewalk and a lot width waiver: The applicant states that there are lots within the surrounding area that are smaller than the required 100’ subdivision requirements. The applicant referenced 50’ lots within Keeney River Fronts and River View Estates. 3 SD 20.30 Ferry Road Estates – August 3, 2020 However, many of the lots narrower than 100’ wide were platted many years ago, pre-dating Fairhope’s subdivision regulations and the Fairhope planning jurisdiction. It should be pointed out that many of the narrow lots in place today were created many years ago and are existing non-conformities. The revised plat depicts the lots with two 35’ minimum front setback lines that are measured on a diagonal. The definition of lot width is defined as “the horizontal distance between sidelines of the lot when measured parallel to the street right-of-way at the building set back line”. Thus, the configuration of the plat is not compliant with the Subdivision Regulations. A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in purple) Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following conditions exist: 1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to other land areas. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Though no hardship is presented, currently there are no sidewalks in the nearby vicinity. However, the applicant is proposing to allow a 15’ sidewalk easement thus a sidewalk can be constructed in the future if needed. Article V Section E.- Lot Width: There is no hardship presented as the lot can remain the current width or be subdivided to one lot and meet the subdivision requirements. 2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Not applicable for this individual case. Article V Section E.- Lot Width: The property owner can continue to utilize the lot as is. 3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations because the existing character of the surrounding properties is such that there are no sidewalks. However, the applicant has provided space for the construction of a sidewalk, if needed. Article V Section E.- Lot Width: The approval of the waiver will nullify the purpose and intent of the regulations. 4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Because property is allocated for future construction for sidewalks, the waiver would be a minimal deviation from the required standard. Article V Section E.- Lot Width: Staff was unable to determine a justifiable hardship. 5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowners, or the public; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects. Article V Section E.- Lot Width: The waiver may have an adverse effect in that surrounding property owners may wish to create additional substandard lot widths. 6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. Article V Section E.- Lot Width: Staff is neutral on this standard. 4 SD 20.30 Ferry Road Estates – August 3, 2020 The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article V.B.2. Approval Standards: “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Not applicable b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Not applicable c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulation s; • Does not meet regulations d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Does not meet regulations e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Follow-Up Activities Required by Staff and/or the Applicant: If it is the pleasure of the Planning Commission to approve subject case, the applicant is advised the final plat must be recorded in the Judge of Probate’s office within sixty (60) days of final plat approval by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission, or the final plat approval is null and void. Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of SD 20.30 for the following reason: 1) The lots do not meet the 100’ minimum lot width as required by the Subdivision Regulations. /PUUP4DBMF OWNER S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE: STATE OF ----- COUNTY OF ____ _, This is to certify that, CORINNE JOHNSON SNYDER, the undersigned do hereby certify that I am the Owner of the within platted and described lands and that I have caused the same to be surveyed and subdivided as indicated hereon, far the uses and purposes herein set forth and do hereby acknowledge and adopt the some under the design and title heron indicated, and grant all easements and dedicate all Streets, to the public or private uses as noted on this plat. CORINNE JOHNSON SNYDER Date NOT ARY PUBLIC: STATE OF ----- COUNTY OF Notary Public -County, My Commission Expires: _______ _ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY AT&T-Alabama -TELEPHONE: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BALDWIN COUNTY E-911 ADDRESSING The undersigned, as aurhorized by the Baldwin CoLX1ty E-911 Board, hereby approves the Road names as depicted on the within plot and hereby approves the within plot for the Recording of same in the Judge of Probates Office, Baldwin County, Alabama, on this the __ day of ______ 20_ Authorized Representative Signature The undersigned, as authorized by _________ hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Office of the Judge of Probate, Baldwin County, Alabama, this the ____ day of ______ 2020. Authorized representative POWER COMPANY CERTIFICATE: The undersigned, as authorized by Baldwin County EMC, hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Office of the Judge of Probate, Baldwin County, Alabama, this the ____ day of ______ 2020. Authorized representative CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF UTILITIES BY CITY OF FAIRHOPE for GAS, & WATER: The undersigned, as authorized by The City of Fairhope, hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Office of the Judge of Probate.Baldwin County, Alabama, this the ___ day of ------~ 20_. Authorized Representative GAS Authorized Representative WATER CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY BALDWIN COUNTY SEWER SERVICE: The undersigned, as authorized by Baldwin County Sewer Service does hereby approve the within plat for the recording o same in the Office, of the Judge of Probate, Baldwin County, Alabama. This the __ day of-------~ 2020 Authorized Representative CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION This plot hos been submitted to and considered by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission and is hereby approved. Dated this tt,e _day of _____ 20_. Secretary or Authorized Representative CERTIFICATE OF THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR: on this the __ day of _____ 20_ J 1 i i:::i < 0 ~ >-< ~ ~ r,i J;. i 1, " ~ Planning Director EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ,¢- COUNTY ENGINEER: The undersigned, as County Engineer of Baldwin County, Alabama, hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Probate Office of Baldwin County, Alabama, this the ____ day of -----~ 20_ County Engineer OWNER / DEVELOPER 05-55-03-06-0-001-016.000 PIN: 317 SNYDER, CORINNE JOHNSON P O BOX 2042 BLOWING ROCK NC 28605 RESIDENTIAL NOT ZONED FRBC{Arnold) WEST 894.00' NE Corner of Sec 6, T-7-S, R-2-E RIVER VIEW EST ATES Recorded in Map Book 5, Page 11 05-55-03-06-0-00 1-004.005 PIN: 246622 BLACKLAND INVESTMENTS L L C 12425 BOONE LN FAIRHOPE AL 36532 Residential Not Zoned EAST 291' +/-WEST Deed S 89° 56' 14" E 284.69' Msd s 870 13' 02" w 174' +/- 05-55-03-06-0-001-0 16.004 PIN: 344055 GREENE, ANA M 25833 TEAL WOOD DR DAPHNE AL 36526 Residential Not Zoned FourKIOpenTopP1pe2-footTol 0' 50' 100' 150' Graphic Scale 1" -30' MOORE SURVEYING, INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING 555 NORTH SECTION STREET, FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 PHONE (251) 92B -6777 Email maoresurveying@bellsouth.net SIP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE DATA: 1. Total Number of Lots 2, Project Size 0.89 Acres Smallest Lot 16,378 Square Feet Largest Lot 22,368 Square Feet JUDGE OF PROBATE STAMP 2. The Lots ore served by AT & T Communications (BELLSOUTH) -Telephone, City of Fairhope Water, Gos, Baldwin County Sewer Service Sewer Baldwin County EMC -Power 3. Property lies Outside the City of Fairhope. 4. Property is NOT Zoned. Building Setbacks FRONT 35 Feet REAR 50 Feet from River Bank SIDE 15 Feet Unless Otherwise Noted Hereon. NO NEW Streets or Utility Lines this Project at this time. Drainage and Utility Easements are as shown hereon. There is a 15-foot wide Sidewalk, Drainage and Utility Easement along Ferry Road. FLOOD CERTIFICATE: I also state that I have examined the current FIA Official Flood Hazard Map, Community Number O 15000, Panel Number 0785 M, (01003C0785 M) and found referenced lot above lies in Flood Zone AE (Elev. 12), Mop Dated April 19, 2019. VICINITY MAP SURVEYORS NOTES: 1 Al measurements were mode in accordance with U.S. Standards. Descriptionosfurnishedbyaient. There may be Recorded or Unrecorded Deeds, Easements, ri,;ht-of-ways, or other instruments thotcouldoffecttheBoundoriesofsoidproperties. 4 ~~~io;0:r ~~ti~:ezir~n~ tii=-~~f~c!hfeit~~~~nce, such as Septic Tonks, Underground Utilities, Footin<;is, etc. 5 Bearings and Distances shown hereon were "Computed" from actual field traverses. 6 The Basis of Bearings far this Survey are Based on Grid North as established by G. P. S. Real Time Network R. T. K., referenced to NAD 1983, Alabama West Zone. 7 There was NO attempt mode to locate any Enviromiental issues such as but not limited to Wet Lands, Fuel Tanks, etc. B Owner Must Verify Wetlands Location if Shown on Survey with the proper authorities before any construction is to be started. 9 RefertaRecordedDeeds,Plats,RestrictiveCovenonts for any additional Information. 10 Measurements of the Residence ore exterior dimensions andorenottobeusedforcalculotingsquarefootage of Residence. 11 Flood Zones are scaled from the current FEMA maps. 12 Limits of proposed Residence to be stoked ore os per cijentsinstructions. 13 Verify any Buildi~ Setbacks and Building location with 14 !~16 :~r~:~;~t1ht~i~1~°lt~rEJj~;;;/~£:~;:~~: Named hereon and may not be used by a Third Party. 15 This Survey is Valid for :30 days from the date of survey ond it is NOT Transferable too Third Porty ond mar ~~se~~ ~;;~ f~~~y~~;;;.;;trn~:e o~t~)t~t ro~;e_wr1tten 16. This Survey is based upon existing monumentotion found ashereonstatesanddoesnotpurporttorepresenta retracement of the Government Survey. Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 6, Township 7 South, Range 3 East, St. Stephens Meridian, Baldwin County, Alabama, thence run West, a distance of 894.00' to a point; thence run South, a distance of 1,169.50' to on iron pin marker lying on the East Right-of-way line of Ferry Road (50 feet Right-of-way at this point) for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run South 89 degrees 56 minutes 14 seconds East, a distance of 291 feet, more or less, to a point on the West margin of Fish River; thence run Southerly along said West margin of Fish River a distance of 215 feet, more or less, to a point; thence run South 87 degrees 13 minutes 02 seconds West, a distance of 174 feet, more or less, to an iron pin marker lying on the West Right-of-way line of Ferry Rood (50 feet Right-of-way at this point); thence run North 00 degrees 23 minutes 05 seconds West, along said West Right-of-way line, a distance of 183.60 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.89 acres, more or less. JOB NO. 2020 89 DATE 5/20/2020 ~~;f YORK 5/07/2020 DRAWN BY SWM SCALE 1" = 30' I, Seth W. Moore, a Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, hereby state that all ports of this survey and drawing hove been completed in accordance with the requirements by the Standards of Practice for land Surveying in the State of Alabama to the best of my Knowledge, information and belief, this is a true and correct mop. All according to my survey made this the __ day of ___ _ 2020. I also state that this drawing and or certification does not reflect any title or easement research, other than what is visible on the ground or provided by the clients at time of survey. Seth W. Moore, P.L.S. Alo. Reg. No. 16671 FERRY ROAD EST ATE A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION July 14, 2020 Fairhope Planning Commission Fairhope, Alabama Dear Commissioners; I am asking for a variance/ waiver of the lot width of 100 feet to be reduced to a 91 feet wide lot width. Because of the following: The lot just south of this proposed subdivision is also 91 feet wide. The 35 lots within Keeney River Fronts Subdivision are SO feet wide on Keeney Drive to the south of this subdivision. The 6 lots in River View Estates have a lot width of 50 feet wide on Ferry Road Circle. Please see the attached Baldwin County Tax Maps of those subdivisions that shows the lot widths. I would like to thank you for your time and consideration of this variance/ waiver of the lot Width. L~/,_ ~ Corinne er P.O. Box 2 Blowing Rock, NC 28605 2020 _,...-Planning Commission Fairhope, Alabama Dear Commissioners; I am asking for a variance/ waiver of the lot width of 100 feet to be reduced to a 91 feet wide lot width. Because of the following: The lot just south of this proposed subdivision is also 91 feet wide. The 35 lots within Keeney River Fronts Subdivision are 50 feet wide on Keeney Drive to the south of this subdivision. The 6 lots in River View Estates have a lot width of 50 feet wide on Ferry Road Circle. Please see the attached Baldwin County Tax Maps of those subdivisions that shows the lot widths. I would like to thank you for your time and consideration of this variance/ waiver of the lot Width. _,.,/' {_ / / ~ Corinne er P.O. Box 2 Blowing Rock, NC 28605 • wifh each and EVERY hurricane flooding has occurred. In order for a house built on this property to avoid any flooding it would have to be built 6-8 feet off the ground. None of the adjacent houses are built on "stilts." Again this would NOT enhance the aesthetic appearance of the said property or neighborhood. In your letter you asked for comments. I hope this email will result in your reconsideration of allowing this property to be subdivided. I understand about progress and the changes in time and rules. However, I bought my house with an agreement that subdivision would never be an issue. Promises made and promises kept are what this Country, State and County are all about. These are troubling times and it would be nice to know that we have the support of our local county representatives. Promises made over 30 years ago should not be ignored for the sake of progress but the promises should be kept. Thank you in advance for your consideration in the matter of the subdivision of property on Ferry Road, Case SD 20.30. Arlene DiPiietro 16799 Ferry Road Fairhope, AL 36532 251-928-1519 2 VIA E-M}1.,.L; ATTACHMENT June 9, 2020 Mr. Seth Moore Moore Surveying Inc. 555 North Section Street Fairhope, Alabama SD 20.30 Ferry Road Estate Subdivision Dear Mr. Seth Moore, This review package is derived from various components of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and/or staff recommendations. Staff has reviewed the subject application to determine if the application meets all the requirements of the City o,f Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. Listed below you will find staff's comprehensive review of items derived from the checklist for the various requirements of the above-referenced submission. Missing or outstanding items, or items requiring revision and resubmission are further described below. The following non-exhaustive list summarizes the outstanding items requiring revision and resubmission or follow-up information for the subject application: • Article VI, Section H. Please provide letter by Baldwin County Sewer to confirm sewer service. • Article VI, Section G. -The plat does not depict a fire hydrant. Please revise plat to depict an existing fire hydrant that is within 450 feet or depict the installment of a new fire hydrant. If the applicant can not provide the previous information a waiver request will be required. The application is scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on Monday July 6, 2020. A response to this letter addressing all outstanding items is required no later than 9:00 AM on Thursday June 18, 2020. If the deadline passes with no response, the application will be withheld from the agenda due to an incomplete application. Please provide eighteen (18) copies of the revised final plat on llxl 7 paper as well as in Adobe pdf format on a compact disc. Please provide full-size copies of any revised plans. Please feel free to contact me at (251) 928-8003 with questions. VIA E-Mn--.L ATTACHMENT Respectfully, Carla L. Davis City Planner City of Fairhope 1 SD 20.31 Dewberry Estates – August 3, 2020 Planning Commission August 3, 2020 2-Lot Minor Subdivision Approval Case: SD 20.31 Dewberry Estates Project Name: Dewberry Estates Minor Property Owner /Applican Joey & Janet Langley General Location: North side of Dewberry Lane Project Type: Minor Subdivision inside Fairhope’s ETJ Number of lots: 2 Project Acreage: 3.80 Zoning District: Unzoned PPIN Number: 56024 Surveyor of record: Smith, Clark & Associates School District: J Larry Newton School, Fairhope Middle, Fairhope High School Report prepared by: Samara Walley, MCP City Planner Recommendation: Approve with Conditions N N Subject Site Hwy. 181 Hwy. 181 Subject Site 2 SD 20.31 Dewberry Estates – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of Joey and Janet Langley for plat approval of Dewberry Estates, a 2-lot minor division. The property is approximately 3.80 acres and is located on the north side of Dewberry Lane, at 9781 Dewberry Lane. Comments: This application was previously heard at the July 6, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. The application was tabled to allow coordination with the Fire Inspector with regards to location of a fire hydrant. Additionally, there were concerns about the physical condition of the private road. The applicant has coordinated with the Fire Inspector who has since amended his previous recommendation. The subject property is in Fairhope’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction and therefore must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing flow patterns will be changed by this replat. Gas and Water services will be provided by the City of Fairhope. Sewer is not available. Power is supplied by Riviera Utilities. AT&T will provide services as well. The preliminary plat illustrates a 2-lot subdivision. There is an existing dwelling on the proposed Lot 1 and an existing 15’x12’ shed on the proposed Lot 2. There are utilities easements located along the perimeter of each lot. The proposed lots do not front a paved, publicly maintained road but rather a 30’ ingress & egress easement. The applicant has submitted a waiver request for frontage on a public street. The applicant has also submitted waiver requests for a sidewalk and fire hydrant. Originally, Staff received comments via email from the City of Fairhope Fire Inspector official stating that he would not be in favor of the approval of a waiver for a fire hydrant at this location. He noted the following reasons for his disapproval: 1) Nearest hydrant location. 2)Road access, width, and condition 3) Hydrant located across major roadway. After a more extensive review of the site and several site visits, he has since amended his recommendation, stating that the existing hydrant on Highway 181 is sufficient. However, it has been recommended that the private road be improved. Therefore, Staff will recommend roadway approvements that will support the weight of a 75,500lb GVWR vehicle. Waiver Request: Article V Section E. Lot Standards requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “Except as provided in Section D.6., all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly maintained street.” Article VI Section D. Sidewalks requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope.” Article VI, Section G. Fire Hydrants requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “fire hydrants shall be installed along each street at a maximum interval of four hundred fifty (450) feet, or at the ends and center of each block, or at otherwise required by the fire authority having jurisdiction.” A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in blue; revised to reflect additional information) Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following conditions exist: 3 SD 20.31 Dewberry Estates – August 3, 2020 1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to other land areas. Article V Section E. – Lot Standards: Though no hardship is presented, the lot has functioned in this configuration with the 30’ access easement as illustrated. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Though no hardship is presented, currently there are no sidewalks in the nearby vicinity. Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The applicant has not presented an extraordinary hardship. 2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider. Article V Section E. – Lot Standards: Not applicable for this individual case. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Not applicable for this individual case. Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: Not applicable for this individual case. 3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan. Article V Section E. – Lot Standards: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations because the existing dwelling has been accessed through the existing easement. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations because the existing character of the surrounding properties is such that there are no sidewalks. Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The existing fire hydrant is located at an interval greater than the required 450’ feet. However, the requirements state that the “fire authority having jurisdiction” is in agreement with the location. 4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship; Article V Section E. – Lot Standards: The waiver will be a minimum deviation from the requirements. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: The waiver would be minimum deviation from the required standard. Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The applicant has not presented any hardship associated with site that would justify the approval of this waiver. However, the Fire Inspector is in agreement with the waiver. 5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowners, or the public; Article V Section E. – Lot Standards: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects. Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The Fire Inspector does not find that the waiver will present any adverse effects. 6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done. Article V Section E. – Lot Standards: Staff is neutral on this standard. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: Staff does not find a substantial hardship however the Fire Inspector is in agreement with the waiver. The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards: “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; 4 SD 20.31 Dewberry Estates – August 3, 2020 • Not applicable b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Not applicable c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets – after determination from the Fire Inspector. d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets – after determination from Fire Inspector. Recommendation: Staff recommends PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL SD 20.31 subject to the following conditions: 1. Provision of a 26’ wide access road that supports the weight of a 75,000lb GVWR vehicle; a. Improvements should be drawn and stamped by a professional engineer and included with any land disturbance permits; b. As-built drawings stamped by a professional engineer indicating that the improved road meets the 26’ width and 75,000 lb. capacity shall be submitted with final plat; 2. Acceptance of a waiver from the requirement to install a fire hydrant as required by Article IV Section G.; 3. Acceptance of the waiver from the requirement for sidewalk installation as required in Article VI, Section D; and 4. Acceptance of the waiver request to allow a subdivision that does not front a paved, publicly maintained road as required in Article V Section E. '(:%(55</$1(/$1*/(<'(:%(55<(67$7(6GZJ$5&+'/$1'6&$3(PIN: 32559 OWNER: CHILDRESS FARM COMPOSED OF CHILDRESS, EM C/0 EMERY E CHILDRESS FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 (#4) RBF SUR'IEYOR"S CffiTIFICATIDN, BALJJWIN COUNTY ALABllt4 TOTAL PARCEL DESCRIPTION; PIN: 341243 OWNER: BREAZEALE, BILLY CL.A.LID ETUX JACQUELINE C 1 06 ROSE PERKINS EVANS DR STARKVILLE, MS 39759 357.53" (0) 15' UTILITY EASEMENT -?l flf/J " CR (FAIRHOPE) ~ PIN: 44420 OWNER: AINSWORTH, RAY ETAL AINSWORTH, AMY 15297 CO RD 9 SUIAMERDALE, AL 36580 BASIS OF BEARING N 89'55'01~ E 507.47' (R) N 89"55"01" E 507.36" (0) 112.3' CRF (FAIRHOPE) LOT 1 85952 SQ. FT.± 1.97 AC± --, 5-. UTILITY EASEMEN1 155.29° (0) PIN: 365486 OWNER: HAYS, JAMES H 9781 DEWBERRY LN FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHrAST CORNER OF SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH. RANGE 2 EAST, ST. illPHENS MERIDv.N. BALDWIN COUNTY. AlAIWI-\; THENCE NORTH 00"12'00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1011.95 Fm TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89"57'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 668.68 mT TO A POINT 11,!RKED BY A CAPPW IRON ROO (REBAR); THENCE SOUTH 8T07'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 150.2J FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID POINT /IAflKED BY AN IRON ROD (REBAR); THENCE SOUTH BTOJ"05" WEST A DISTANCE OF J05.29 Fm TO A POINT /IAflKED BY A CAPPED IRON ROD (REBAR); THENCE NORTH 31"06'45" WEST A DISTANCE OF J94.07 fill TO A POINT MARKED BY AN IRON ROO (REBAR); THENCE NORTH 89"55'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF 507.J6 FEET TO A POINT MARKW BY A CAPPW IRON ROO (REBAR); THENCE SOUTH 00"12'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 322.42 fill TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1J4821 SQUARE Fm (J.10 ACRES). MORE OR lfSS. TOGETHER WITH A JO FOOT EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHrAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, ST. illPHENS MERIOv.N, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA; THENCE NORTH 00"12'00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1011.95 Fm TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89"57'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 46.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89"57'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 621.78 FEIT TO A POINT MARKED BY A CAPPED IRON ROD (REBAR); THENCE SOUTH 8T07'16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 150.2J FEET TO A POINT MARKED BY AN IRON ROD (REBAR); THENCE SOUTH 8TOJ'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF J05.29 Fm TO A POINT MARKW BY A CAPPED IRON ROD (REBAR); THENCE SOUTH J1"09'J1" WEST A D6TANCE OF J6.IJ FEET TO A POINT MARKW BY A CAPPED IRON ROD (REBAR); THENCE NORTH 8705°06" EAST A DISTANCE OF 474.JJ FEET TO A POINf; THENCE NORTH 89"57"16" EAST A D5TANCE OF 621.BS FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 00"11"14" WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEIT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL PARTS OF THIS SURVEY ANO DRAWING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING IN THE STAJE OF ALABllt4 TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. INFORMATION. AND BELIEF. 7 I I I CRS t I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I "1 149.83" (0) 15' UTILITY EASEMENT LOT 2 48870 SQ. FT.± 1.12 AC± 7 I ~ I PPe-mw-~ N_ 15'X12' SHED / : ~: ~@: -106.6"-1 I',,,,,~~ I : : "'' ~ _J L __J 15' UTILITY EASEMENi (FAIRHOPE) CRF O' 30' "'"-•c-PIN: 341241 OWNER: HAYS, JACK C 9817 DEWBERRY LN FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 P.0.8. PARCEL 1 150.00' (0) S 87'07'16" W 150.23' {O) CRS f;f/·B. PARCEL 2 S B7'04,51~ w 150.18' (R) 60' CR {ILLEGIBLE, #4) S 87"03'05" W 305.29' (0) ~ s 8704"51" w~:;;;Niiirniav11u::iic----------c----==~-----~~=--~" DEWBERRY LANE ASPHALT '---:' --N 87'05'06" E 474.33' PIN: 3654-85 OWNER: HAYS, JEFFRY W 9781 DEWBERRY LN FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 SITE DATA TABL[ PN?Cfl./0:.56024 TOT&AREA:1.J4-,821SOON1£.FEEJ,J.!0>£Rf5 HUMf£ROf1075:2 51.WlESTLOT:48.BlOSQIMREFEET, J.12NH. AUJHOOITYfMW4GJUR/SDICTIOH:FAIRHOP£~-1ERRITORNI.) ZONf.G• UHZOHED (f'lXJHrYPUJIHWG DISTRICT 17) SOURCf:2D19PI..M'N/NGDISTRIC1511il' PROPOSED UNO USf: R£SIOOflW. COONrY FNJH..Y DMSION/ F>JRHOPfMIHOR2LOT SU/M'tORNOJrS: 1.Tr1'EOfSURVEY:D/VIS/ONOFPROPERTY 2. ~D DJIEHS/OHS. 81.SfD OH WMIWITY DffD RfCORDfD AS //ISTRIJNOO NUISR 1559081 IN THf OFFlC£ OFTIIE .MDGE Of PROBA7r, IW.DIYW COUHTY, ~ J. THIS DAA\ffHGANDDfSCR1PTIOH DOES HOTRfFl£CTl,J('ITIT!.£OREASEMEHT'R£SEARCI! OlHER 1}i'.N WI-MT IS VISIBLE OR PROVIDED BY THE CUfNi'S CONVEYANCE. SE1B'CK LINES E5TABUSHE[)BYSTAITJ1E;ORDIHANCEORRESTRICT1VECOIDWi!SN?fHOTSHOWN. .f.. 1HIS DRAll'JN'G IS JHE PROPfRJYOF SM/IH, CURK .t.4SSJCl6.ITT. ff IS SCX.llY FOR Jf£ USE Of 1HE ct.m NAMED /-£REON AffJ IS NONrRNISFERl&E TO N« O1HER PMTY. rT l!MY l«JT B£ USED W!THOOT PRKJR COHSEHr FROM SMfTH, WRK .t ASSOC"-ITT. 5. THIS DAA\ffNG IS TO SCAI.E WHEN PR!NTED ON 2.f.XJ6 P_.lffR IN I.ANDSfJI'[ VlfW IIITH NO SOONG. 90' I JBiW1 L::J.CRF L::J.CTF i::l.0TF 8RBF L::J.IPF OCRS (R) (0) R.o.r. P.0.C. CAPPfD/RONRODf'OUND CRMPU! TOP PIP£ FOUND CHN TOP IRON P/Pf FDIJND R£fJM IRON FOUND IR<1'PINfOIJND CAPPfD IRON ROD SU RECORD OBSEW RfGHl'OFIIMY POIHTOFCD/tlMENCEl,ffNT' P.O.B. POINT OF f£GIHH/NG ---0-CHNN LINK FENCE -X-HFEHCE -/-M'.X)OfEHCE :0:LP LOO PO/£ ePP ~pru @ SWrTAR'Y SEWER IWIHDLE t()JSI/ SWrTN?Y SEWER VAi.\-£ [II,..., El.EGTR!CN..7RNiSFORMER ~.,,. GASWETER /?lWMWV roJER""" !xJ N41B?VAI.VE QFH """"""" □TP mEPHCM PfDEST& CEBJIFIOOI ff APPBQYAJ BY BMFBA IWI mFS~ 1HEUNDERSIGNED,>SAUTHORIZEDBYRIVIERAUTILIT1ESHEREBYAPPROVES1HEWITHIN PIATFORRECO!mlNGOF1HESAMEIN1HEPROB'.TEOFFICEOF8Al..llWINCOUNlY, ALABAMA, THIS THE __ OF ____ 20 AUTHORIZED REPR&NTATh'E CfRilfl:AIT Of Af'PP'AI BY mx CF ENHHOPF r.A.5: n£UN~IGNED,>SAUTHORIZEDBY1HEFAIRHOPElJTLl11ES,DOHEREBYAPPRO'vE1HE WITHINPIATFCRREClllDtlGOFlHESAIEINlHEPROB.4.lEO~EOFBAI..D'#INCCIJNlY, .,,..,._ DA.TEDlHIS DA.YOF ___ 20_ COUNlYENGINEER CFRJlflCA.JF Of APPRWAI BY PJJIJWIN COUNTY HfAIJH DFPARTIIOO= 1HE LOT(S) ON lHIS PLI.T ARE SUB.ECTTO APPRIJV,t,l_ OR IE.flll)J BY lHE IW.DWIN COUNlY HEAl..lH DEPARTMENT. NO REPRESEHTATION IS IOOEM.T ANYLOTOHTHS PLAT Will ACCOMMODATE AN ONSITE SEWA!ESYSTEM (OSS). lHEAPPROPRIATENESS OFA LOT FOR WASTEWATER (SE.WAG£) TRfATLENT AND DISPOSAL SIW.1 BE DETERMINED iffN AN APPLICATION IS SUIIHTIED. F PERWITTED, lHE LOT APPROVN. W.Y CONTAIN CERTAIN CONDIOONS WHICH RESTRICTlHEUSEOFTHELOTOROBIJGATETHEOWNERSTOSPECW.w.lNTENANCEAHD REPORTINGREOUIREMENTS,AHD1HESEAREONFlE'MTH1HESAIJHEM.1HOEPARIMEHTAND AREtu.DEAPARTOFTHISPLAT>SIFSETOOTHEREON. SIGNEDTHIS DA.YOF ____ ,o_ AUTHORIZEDSIGNAlURE CFRIRAlF OC OWNFRSHP MIP IEJOOXJH; THSISTO CERTIFYlHATI {ii[), MUNDERSl',NED,AM(ARE)lHEOWNER(S) OFlHE IANDSHO~ANDIESCRIIEllNlHEPIAT,ANDTHATl(WE)~VECAUSEDlHESAMETO 1£ SlJlDMDED HEREON, FORTh'E USES AND PURPOSES HERBN SET FORTI-IIHD DO HEREB'f.lGKNOWI..EIJGEANDADOPTlHESI.MEUNDERlHEDESIGNANDTITLEHEIEON INDICATED:ANDGIW4TAL1EASEMENTSTOPUBI.ICORPRIYATEUSE>SNOTED. DI.TED lHIS__, DA.Y(l" _________ ~2020 OWNER ACKNOWIEOOFMENI Of t«)TAR'f PIJBIIC: STATEOF>UBAMA) COUHTYOFEW..DWIN) '·=========~. NOTAR'l'PIRK: INNfJFOR TI£ COUNIY OF BAI.D'#tl ti THE STATE OFAI.J.B>MA. DO HEREBY CERTIFY MT WHOSE NNilE(S)IS(ARE)SUBSCRIBEDTOlHECERTIFlCAllCJIOFO\ffRSHIPANDDEDK:AllON, .'f'PEARED BEFORE t.lE THIS DAY N PERSON AND ACKNOWI..EDGE THAT 1-£ ('THEY) SIGNED, SfAI..ED AND DELIVERED BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN PER9JN AND ACKNOWI..Ecx;[ THAT HE {Tl£Y} SIGNED, SfALED AND DEI.MREO SAID INSTRUMEHT AT HIS (THEIR) FREE AND VOLLNTAR'l',tCTFORTHEUSESANOPURPOSESTHEREINSETFORTH. Gl'v£N UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL THIS__, DAY or ____ ~ 2020 tmARY PUIUC CFHDFQTE Cf APPRWAI BY THE BM DWIN OOIJNTY Pl ANMNG PIBFC:IW· Tt£UNDERSIGNED,>SDIRECTORCf'IW..DWINCOUNTYPLANNlt£ANDZONINGDEPARnlENT, HEREBYAPPROVES™EWITHNPIATFORRECO!lllt£0F1HESN.E:IN1HEPROB.4.TE OFFICEOFBAI..OWINCOUNTY,!WJNAA. DA.TEDTHS_ DA.YOF ___ :,J_ Pl.ANNING DRECTCR CFRTIRl:AJF OF Af'PRW,IJ fft COIJNJY IJlilNFfR: THEUNOCRSIGNED,ASCOUNTYENGINEEROfEW..DWINCOUNlY,"1ABMIA,HERIB1' APPROVESlHEWITHNPIATFOORECOROINGOfTHESAMEINTHEPROB'.TEOFFlll:OF IW..DWINCOLtll'l,AI..AIWU.. DATEDTHIS DAYOf ___ ,o_ COUNIYENGINEER CFRTIFlc:AJFOfAf'PRW.IJ fftCITYOCfAIBHPPFWAJFR; THEUNCERSIGNED,ASNJTI-fflZEDBYTHEFAIRHOPElJTLl11ES,OOIEOYAPPROVETHE WITHINPLATFOORECOllllNGOFlHESAWEINlHEPRO&.lEOFFICEOFBAI..DWINCOUNlY, -DATEDlHIS DAYOF ___ 20_ COUNIYENGINEER P.O.B. EASEMENT -+--S 89"57'16" W 668.68' 621.78' 30' INGRESS &: EGRESS EASEMENT Dewberry Estates Final Plat OS PTS BAG 11/14/19 1'"=30" FY/fl;: 191106-9781 95/15 LANGLEY DEWBERRY ESTATES DEWBERRY LANE FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA ~ ~ 46.90' (/1 E "7 :r: C) :r: ::,: ~ co 00 0. a:, i:::, ~ 27 P.0.C. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 27, T-6-S, R-2-E, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA 34 26 35 Fire Inspection Report conducted for Dewberry Lane Inspection Type Inspection Address Dewberry Lane Conducted on 07/20/2020, 11:46 Contractor/ Owner Name Hunter Smith Score 1/2 - 50% Completed on 07/20/2020, 11:53 In order to maintain the integrity and credibility of the fire inspection processes and to protect the parties involved, it is understood that the inspector will not divulge to unauthorized persons any information obtained during this fire inspection unless legally obligated to do so. Confidentiality Statement The inspector believes the information contained within this fire inspection report to be correct at the time of the affixed signature. The report is based on matters which were observed or came to the attention of the inspector during the day of the fire inspection and should not be relied upon as an exhaustive record of all possible risks or hazards that may exist or potential improvements that can be made. Correction and abatement of violations of this code shall be the responsibility of the owner. Correct each violation, by complying with the notice, no more than three weeks from this inspection, unless otherwise specified. Disclaimer Inspection / Dewberry Lane / Dewberry Lane - 2 - Audit - 1/2 - 50% Question Response Details After evaluating the road for the last time. This will be my recommendation for the access road off HWY 181 to Dewberry lane. 1)Maintain a height distance of 13’6 clearance to end of property.(over hanging trees) 2)Pave the first 700 Feet (asphalt)and maintain the existing road. Fairhope Fire Inspector Sandy Garber 07/20/2020 11:53 Owner/Contractor/ Business Owner Inspection Outcome No Action/ General Comments Inspection / Dewberry Lane / Dewberry Lane Score (1/2) 50%- 3 - I ?7-Vt_, 1 SD 20.23 Parkstone Subdivision – August 3, 2020 Planning Commission August 3, 2020 Preliminary Plat Case: SD 20.23 Parkstone Subdivision Project Name: Parkstone Property Owner /Applicant: Eastpark, LLC General Location: North side of Parker Road just East of US Hwy. 98. Project Type: Preliminary Plat Number of lots: 41 Project Acreage: 12.63+/- Zoning District: Planned Unit Development PPIN Number: 15985 and 32028 Engineer of record: Tom Granger, PE Sawgrass Consulting School District: Fairhope Elementary, Intermediate, Middle, and High School Report prepared by: Mike Jeffries, QCI Planner Recommendation: Denial .!... Subj ect Property en I P.-i1dii:er Rd ll-lPGIIP.,~S•'•111i'y 0 1t.Jl1tToW1110U .. $"91,f..,,ry _R ... low0fflatyll~.,_,...,.ry ll../511,gnD-tyD¥41r'IIJRl$Ol®'I ll .. llOllhll_P...,D•ln:1 _e-,~s~,01111112 e...20.,,.,llllu•-D•l•IC:r I - a------j =:~:::::=:;~:_,o_,a - -B-1 au,.,.....,aProflpDN1I01ana ----~------< :::,I ~=:•M~D- PUO PIIIMecl'U,,•Ot>eli)pln.fnl □Parc:alloll.Jne 2 SD 20.23 Parkstone Subdivision – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of Eastpark, LLC for Preliminary plat approval of Parkstone Subdivision at Eastpark PUD, a 41-lot division. The property is approximately 12.63 acres and is located on the north side of Parker Road just east of US Hwy. 98. The subject property received final approval at the December 23rd 2019 City Council meeting for an amendment to the existing Planned Unit Development (PUD). Comments: The proposed subdivision has been reviewed according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The property being a PUD has an approved site plan that this subdivision had to be reviewed against as well. - The subject property being a PUD has a separate parcel that has the same allowed business uses as B-2 Zoning in Fairhope’s Zoning Ordinance. It is indicated as lot 41 on the proposed plat. - Storm water is partially routed to a small detention pond and then discharges into the main detention pond that also receives the storm water from the remainder of the site providing the required 80% TSS S ITE DA TA TOTAL ACR EAG E = 12_84 ACR ES± TOTAL LI IN EAR FOO TAG E OF ST REETS = 1,845 L. F.± TOTAL NUMIB ER OF LOTS = 4 1 LOTS MINIMUM LOT SIZE = 6,304 S.F.± (0.114 AC~ES±)(LD T 2 1) ZON ING = PUO (S EE PUO OIRO INANIC E # 1668) AND IBA LDW IN COUNTY IB-2 (TAX 05 -46-03 -05 -0 -000 -0110 .008 ONI LY) MAX IMUM LOT COV ERAG E = 48% MAX IMUM BU I LID ING HEI GHT = 35 FEET MINIMUM BU IL DING SETBACKS LOTS 1-117 & 23,-40 FRON T = 2.0 FEET REAR = 20 FEET SIDE = 7 FEET SI DE STREET = '15 FEET LOTS 18 -22 FRON T = 1 5 FEET IR EAR = 15 FEET SIID E = 7 FEET LOT 41 ON LY FRON T = 20 FEET IR EAR = 20 FEET SIDE = 0 FEET 3 SD 20.23 Parkstone Subdivision – August 3, 2020 removal. The stormwater is then discharged via pipe under US Hwy. 98 at a lower release rate than the pre-construction rate into Rock Creek. - A traffic study analysis was conducted by Kenneth Nichols, P.E., PTOE with Gulf Coast Traffic and Development Services, LLC. He states in his report “traffic on Parker Road is relatively low in volume and it is my opinion that no detailed traffic analysis is warranted as a result of the development.” The report and traffic data are included with this staff report. o There is one main entrance on Parker Road and one right in/right out entrance via an easement to Greeno Road. - The proposed development per the approved PUD Ordinance requires 21.3% (2.7acres). The Subdivision regulations require 20% based off the net density of 4.03 units per acre. The proposed development shows 20% (2.54acres). The developer is utilizing the dry detention ponds as part of the green space percentage. The subdivision regulations allow up to a maximum of 30% of the basins to be credited and the provided greenspace calculations utilize the entire 30%. The attached landscape plans show the detention ponds, greenspace, and the enhancements. The enhancements include various plantings, mulch paths, and benches. o Staff believes that the dry detention ponds meet the slope requirements to be counted as greenspace and qualifies to receive partial credit. o The greenspace overall could be better planned out to provide a more beneficial area for the community. The quantity of greenspace provided meets the subdivision regulations but the quality does not. The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards. “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Meets b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Meets c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Does Not Meet d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Recommendation: Staff recommends Denial of SD 20.23 Parkstone Subdivision - - -- PUBLIC NON-EXCLUSIVE INGRESS/EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT∆CHECKED BY: SHEET: DATE: DRAWN BY: OF SCALE:NUMBER:REVISION:DATE: 30673 Sgt. E. I. "Boots" Thomas Drive, Spanish Fort, AL 36527 202 Government Street, Suite 225, Mobile, AL 36602 Phone: (251) 544-7900 11 QM JULY, 2020 1"=50' EASTPARK, LLC PARKSTONE SUBDIVISION AT EASTPARK PUD PRELIMINARY PLAT • • •• • CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR PARKS TONE Tft: UND ERSIG f.EO, AS COUh'TY EN GINEER r£ llALOWN CO\Jfffi', ~-ft:RHlY APP RCM:S THE \llTHN Pl.AT FOR THE RECORDING OF 5,i,.ME IN Tit PROBATE OfHCE OF 8.'.LD•lorn COUNTY, /..LABAW.. Tft: UNDERSIG f-EO, AS DI RECTOR Of mE BALnWIN COONTY PLANNNG A/CJ ZONING DEPARTM ENT, HEREBY N'PRO,'ES THE \lllTHN Pl.AT FOR T}j[ P:ECORD t.lG OF SAME N THE PROBATE OF'FCE Cf" M D'MN COO HTY, ~ 2. ,,._L BE,o,Ri NGSARE BASED ON THE GRID NORTH AS [)ETTRMlf.ED Bi' RTK GPS Ar-.o REfERENCED TO NAD!l3, ALABAMA WEST STATE PLANE COORDINATES 5. ANY FL OCO 70fS"S GM'M OR SHOWN ON THF FACF or TH IS DRA\IIINC /.J/F sc;._m FROM THF Fnlrn/..l EMER GENCYw.NAGEMENTAGENCYrLOCO INSIJRANC EMWS(SCALEO ONLY) 6. 4LL LOT'i ANO COMMON ARE:1.S AR[ Sl.AlJ[CT TO m[ FOLLOW~~ DRAINol.G[ AN □ UTLIT'i [AS[~ENTS (U~ESSOTHERWISESHOWN HEREON ) 10. PER PIJDOODINANC El1668NOACCES500YSTRIXTUlES AAE,'i_jj)WED 11. THE co.i~rnc w.. LOT, +I SH.'.LL BE ,',CCES5ED rRO.i PNlKER RO,<,[) m o NOT TREADSTOf'.E WM WrTHOOT N'PRO\IAL fROI.I THE PlANNINGNW ZONING DIRECTOR SUBDIVISION AT EASTPARK PUD I i L • , ~awgrass ENGINEERING -SURVEYING -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT I l SITE DATA CROS S OENSm' -3.1~ Uf.lTS P£R ACR E MIT Dl'NSITY -+.03 UNITS PER ACRE: OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR ONLY) CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION AND MORTGAGEE W.TT SH.KEY, W,N,\G,NG ~EO,E!ER EJ\STPARK,LLC CERTIFICATE OF NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY RIVIERA UTILITIES (ELECTRIC} SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND DESCRIPTION OF LAND PLATTED L VIC IN IT Y MAP --"-""""-- IN .>(J DfflON,IHEREBYSTATETHAT"'LLPARTSOrTHISSURVEYANDDRAWINC HAVEBEEN COl,IPLETED INACCORDAf.lCEWITHTHE ClRf!ENTREOl.llREMEHTSOf"J,j[STANDAAOSOr PflACTICE roo L'J,[) SURVET1NG ~ THE STATE o r AfABAMA TO THE BEST or MY KNOWLEOO E, INFDRW.TI ON AND BEU Er [RCL L GOOWIN, Pl.S N.NWAA UCEN SENU1,18ER 26e21 Gulf Coast Traffic and Development Services, LLC  P.O. Box 8332  Mobile, AL 36689  knichols@gctds.net  251.654.2989    May 22, 2020    Mr. Tom Granger, P.E.   Sawgrass Consulting, LLC  30673 Sgt. E.I. “Boots” Thomas Drive  Spanish Fort, AL 36537    RE: Parkstone Subdivision, Fairhope, Alabama    Dear Tom,    Per request by Sawgrass Consulting, LLC, a cursory analysis of potential traffic impacts and trips generated  by the proposed Parkstone Subdivision, a forty‐one (41) lot subdivision of single‐family residences, was  performed to estimate daily and peak hour traffic expected to be generated as a result of the  development. Based on the preliminary plat, Parkstone has two access points – one along Parker Road  and one tying into an existing public right‐of‐way with access to Highway 98. Based upon the relative  placement of the two access points, it is anticipated the majority of traffic will use the Parker Road access  on a routine basis.    With 41 proposed single‐family lots, I would anticipate this development generating approximately 390  trips collectively throughout an entire day, with A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips at 31 and 41, respectively.  These estimates are based upon average rates published in the industry‐standard Trip Generation Manual,  9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Given this information and  assumptions, the projected daily and peak hour trip volumes fall well below the daily threshold for traffic  impact study requirements in the City of Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations, which is 1,000 trips per day,  and below the threshold of 50 trips in any peak hour period. Additionally, traffic on Parker Road is  relatively low in volume and it is my opinion that no detailed traffic analysis is warranted as a result of   the development.  Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.    Sincerely,     Kenneth Nichols, P.E., PTOE  Gulf Coast Traffic and Development Services, LLC    w/attachments  Trip Generation SummaryOpen Date:Analysis Date:5/22/20205/22/2020Project: Parkstone SubdivisionAlternative: Alternative 1Phase:ITE Land UseEnter Exit Enter ExitEnter ExitTotalTotal Total***Weekday Average Daily TripsWeekday AM Peak Hour ofAdjacent Street TrafficWeekday PM Peak Hour ofAdjacent Street Traffic210 Parkstone Subdivision41 Dwelling Units195 195 390 8 23 31 26 15 41Unadjusted Volume195 195 3908 23 3126 15 41Internal Capture Trips0 0 00 0 00 0 0000 000 000195 195 3908 23 3126 15 41Pass-By TripsVolume Added to Adjacent StreetsTotal Weekday Average Daily Trips Internal Capture = 0 PercentTotal Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 PercentTotal Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Internal Capture = 0 PercentP. 1TRIP GENERATION 2014, TRAFFICWARE, LLCSource: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, 2012- Custom rate used for selected time period.* Detailed Land Use DataProject:Open Date:Analysis Date:Parkstone Subdivision5/22/20205/22/2020For 41 Dwelling Units of Parkstone Subdivision( 210 ) Single-Family Detached HousingDay / PeriodRateAvgRateMinRateMaxDevStdTripsPass-BySizeAvgEnterExit%%Eq.UseEquationR2TripsTotalWeekday Average Daily Trips9.52 4.313.721.85198 50 50 False Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.72 0.953900Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday AM Peak Hour of Generator0.77 0.330.912.27180 26 74 False T = 0.7(X) + 12.120.89320Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic0.75 0.330.92.27194 25 75 False T = 0.7(X) + 9.740.89310Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday PM Peak Hour of Generator1.02 0.421.052.98174 64 36 False Ln(T) = 0.88 Ln(X) + 0.62 0.91420Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic1 0.421.052.98207 63 37 False Ln(T) = 0.9 Ln(X) + 0.51 0.91410Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Saturday Average Daily Trips9.91 5.323.7215.25215 50 50 False Ln(T) = 0.93 Ln(X) + 2.64 0.924060Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Saturday Peak Hour of Generator0.93 0.50.991.75215 54 46 False T = 0.89(X) + 8.770.91380Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Sunday Average Daily Trips8.62 4.743.3612.31218 50 50 False T = 8.63(X) - 0.630.933530Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :Sunday Peak Hour of Generator0.86 0.550.951.48212 53 47 False Ln(T) = 0.91 Ln(X) + 0.31 0.88350Trip Generation Manual 9th EditionSource :1TRIP GENERATION 2014, TRAFFICWARE, LLCSource: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition, 2012 LORIS WAY (50' R/W)(50' R.O.W.)GREEN SPACE1.34 ACRES(58,270 S.F.)DET.POND 2(50' R.O.W.)GREEN SPACE0.65 ACRE(28,474 S.F.)GREEN SPACE0.88 ACRE(38,332 S.F.)LOT 42COMMERCIAL(0.45 AC.)TREADSTONE WAY(50' R/W)DET.POND 1TOTAL PROPERTY AREA = 12.63 ACRES (550,252 S.FGREEN SPACE PROVIDED = 2.53 ACRES (110,139 S.F.)LOTS: 41L.F. STREETS = 1,845 L.F.GREEN SPACE REQ'D: = 2.53 ACRES (20%)MAIL KIOSKPark Stonelandscape architecture land planning placemaking Foley, Alabama P. 251.948.7181 Mobile, Alabama P. 251.344.4023 Jackson, Mississippi P. 601.790.0781 www.was-design.com TREE PRESERVATION NOTES 00 80'160' TREE PROTECTION SECTION VIEW © 2 N O R T HOVERALL TREE PROTECTION PLAN1 i __ J_ __ J 0 Scale, 1• -80' TREE PRESERVATION D E BITS -Sec. 20.5-4 m = D.llli = OAK 32" PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE PINE OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK PINE PINE PINE OAK OAK PINE OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK OAK PINE OAK OAK 17" 2 OAK 1 ◄" 26" 3 P1NE )I " 25" 3 PECAN ,, .. 20" 2 OAK 15" 17" 2 l'ECAN 17" 17" 2 OM 21" 18" 2 P1NE 16" 24" 3 OAK 26" 24" 3 OAK 16" 21" 2 SPRUCE 18" 15" 1 P1NE 16" 27" 3 P1NE 16 " 14" 1 POPlAR 20" 17" 2 OM 25" 19" 2 SPRUCE 16" 22" 2 SPRUCE 17" 23" 2 OM 18" 17" 2 OM 17" 20" 2 OAK 26" 19" 2 OM 18 " 17" 2 OM 16 " 14" 1 OAK 19" 16" 2 OM 28" 16" 2 OM 20" 26" 3 OM 20" 29" 3 OAK )2" 30" 3 OM 26" 21" 2 OAl( 22" 21" 2 OM 25" 20" 2 OM 16" 21" 2 OAK 30" 16" 2 OM 31" 21" 2 OM 16" 30" 3 OM 18" 14" 1 OM 141" 14" 1 OM 19" 16" 2 OAK 21" 16" 2 OM 29" 18" 2 OM 30" 22" 2 OM J:4" 28" 3 OM 21" 30" 3 OAK 29" 23" 2 OM 33" 22" 2 OM 17" 27" 3 OM ll" 35" 4 OM )2" 30" 3 OM l l" 36" 4 OM 25" 18" 2 OAK 23" 20" 2 OAK 1]" 27" 3 OM 2◄" 22 " 2 OM 57" 15" 1 OM 17" 21" 2 OM 21" 21" 2 OM 18" 17" 2 OAK 241" 17" 2 OAK ll" 18" 2 OAK 2◄" 17" 2 OAK 24" 17" 2 OAK 1 ◄" 17" 2 OAK 17" 24" 3 OM 21" 15" 1 OM 2l" 14" 1 OM 20" 28" 3 OAK 17" 25" 3 OAK w 22" 2 OAK 13" 19" 2 OAK 14" 24" 3 OM 21" 21" 2 OM 21" 21" 2 OM 18 " 21" 2 OAK 16" 21" 2 OAK 17" 21" 2 OAK 2:1" 21" 2 OAK 14" 21" 1 OM 17" 21" 2 OAK 20" 20" 2 OM 24" 20" 2 OAK '40" JRFf Sl IRVFY PISCI AIMER· 1. ALL TREE SURVEY INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY SAWGRASS ENGINEERING. TREE PRFSFRVATION /REMOVAi NOTES· 1. ALL TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL ARE SHOWN IN A SHADE OF GRAY, YIHIL.£ ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED ARE SHOVtN IN BLACK. 2. TREES IN EXCESS OF 20M IN DIAMETER ARE CONSIOERED PROTECTEO. J. TREES SHALL NOT BE RE~OVEO PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT TO DO SO. • , ) 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 ) 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 • 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 ' 2 3 • 2 1 • l l 2 , 3 1 2 2 2 3 1 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 l 5 OAK 27" 3 OAK 17" 2 OAl( 24" ) OM 11" 2 OAK 30" 3 OAK 2 ◄" 3 OM 2 ◄" ) OAK 21" 2 OAK 22" 2 OAK 21" 2 OM 21" 2 OAl( 29" ) OAl( 18" 2 OM 18" 2 OM 22" 2 OM 2.ill" ) OAK 28" 3 OAK 20" 2 OM 25" 3 OM 30" 3 OAK 20" 2 OAl( 20" 2 OM 20" 2 OM 3 ◄" • OM 2◄" 3 OM 17" 2 OM 22" 2 OM 3 ◄" • OM 20" 2 OM 26" ) OM 241" ) OM 30" ) OM 18" 2 OAK 26" 3 OAK 29" 3 OM 2 ◄" 3 OM 37" • OM 29" 3 OM 19" 2 OM 19" 2 OM 19" 2 OM 17" 2 OAK 16" 2 TOTAL OBH I CREDITS ◄3 99 " '70 8.5" X 11"------ sign laminated in plastic spaced every 50' along the fence. 'is:i I "" 1/4" -1'-0" T R E E P RES ERVATIO N DEBITS-S e c. 2 0 .5 -◄(m } = l2lll1 OAK 25," OAK 31" OAK 17" OAK 24" P1NE 20" P1NE ll" OAK 30" P1NE 1," OAK 291" OAK 28" OAK 19" OAK l)" 0AI( 26" OAK ll" OAK 21" OAK 34" OAK 20" P1NE 18" OAK 191" P1NE 17" OAK 22" OAK 21 " OAK l l" OAK 27" P1NE 26," P1NE 22:" P1NE 17" P1NE 23" P1NE 21" P1NE 17" P1NE 23" P1NE 16" OAK 21" OAK 25" OAK 24" OAK 36," OAK 30" OAK w OAK 19" OM 15" OAK 39" OAK 20" OAK 32" OAK 24" OAK lO" OAK l7" OAK 24" OAK 22" OAK 34" OAK 22" OAK 25" OAK 1)" OAK ll" OAK l ◄" OAK 22" OAK 27" OAK 29" OAK 17" OAK 191" OAK 26" OAK 34" OAK l6" OAK ll" OAK 27" OM lO" TOTAL DOH/ DEBITS 1620" Crown drip line ar other limit af Tree Protection area. See tree preservation plan for fence alignment. llEll1I.S. 3 J 2 3 2 3 3 2 J J 2 • 3 1 2 • 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 • 3 ◄ 2 1 • 2 ◄ 3 3 • 3 2 • 2 J 1 2 • 2 3 J 2 2 3 • • • 3 3 17< Notes: 1 -See specifications for additional tree protection requirements. 2-If there is no existing irrigation, see specifications for watering requirements. 3-No pruning shall be performed except by approved arborist. 4-No equipment shall operate inside the protective fencing including during fence installation and removal. 5-See site preparation pion for any modifications with the Tree Protection Tree Protection fence: High density polyethylene fencing with 3.5" x 1.5" openings; Color- orange. Steel posts installed at 8' o.c. 2" x 6' steel posts or approved equal. ----s" thick layer of mulch. Maintain existing grade with the tree protection fence unless otherwise indicated on the plans. u~~~~t~~ro2~l: FX-PL-FX-TRMT-02 landscape architects OO@'ij'~ ~ THESE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ... .e 5i a: 1: al Cl) ~ E C. i 0 l < (D C. 0 Cl) -E C. ~ ~ U) "O ~ c( Re,I ____ ----------- No. Date Revisions / Submissions _ 01.28.20 _CllY_S_UB_M_ITT_A_L _____ _ _ 02.21.20 ~CllY_S_UB_M_ITT_A_L _____ _ _ 03.20.20 ~CllY~S~UB=M~ITT~A~L _____ _ _ 06.12.20 _CllY_S_UB_M_ITT_A_L _____ _ _ 07.09.20 ~CllY~S~UB~M=ITT~A~L _____ _ --------------- SJW ,...,, LCW Checked 192027-037 Project No. 01.28.20 Sheet T1tle OVERALL TREE PROTECTION PLAN ShNt No. TP100 LORIS WAY (50' R/W)(50' R.O.W.)GREEN SPACE1.34 ACRES(58,270 S.F.)DET.POND 2(50' R.O.W.)GREEN SPACE0.65 ACRE(28,474 S.F.)GREEN SPACE0.88 ACRE(38,332 S.F.)LOT 42COMMERCIAL(0.45 AC.)TREADSTONE WAY(50' R/W)DET.POND 1TOTAL PROPERTY AREA = 12.63 ACRES (550,252 S.F.)GREEN SPACE PROVIDED = 2.53 ACRES (110,139 S.F.) (20%)LOTS: 41L.F. STREETS = 1,845 L.F.GREEN SPACE REQ'D: = 2.53 ACRES (20%)MAIL KIOSKDETENTION AREAS = 21,338 S.F.30% OF DET. AREA ALLOWABLE FOR GREEN SPACE = 6,401 S.F.GREENSPACE W/O DET. POND AREA = 103,738 S.F.GREEN SPACE +ALLOWABLE DET. AREA =(103,738 +6,401 S.F.) = 110,139 S.F. (20%)PLANT SCHEDULE 00 80'160'Park Stonelandscape architecture land planning placemaking Foley, Alabama P. 251.948.7181 Mobile, Alabama P. 251.344.4023 Jackson, Mississippi P. 601.790.0781 www.was-design.com 1 LP200 2 LP201 3 LP202 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • GENERAL PLANTING NOTES2 PLANTING ATSHRUB AREAS. STAKING DETAIL PLANTING ATTURF AREAS. PLANT PIT DETAIL TREE PLANTING - GUY STRAP3 QUANTITY TAKEOFF DISCLAIMER: GENERAL NOTES N O R T HOVERALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN1 MULTI-TRUNK TREE STAKING • • 4 $r- l I I I $ ; =~~~f=,~EDs~"'"""""'"'li: EXISTING DA I MULCH I fc _ t 1' \~ ~ ,~,-:- 1 I I I I I I I I L 0 Scale, 1" -80' MULCH I I __ J_ __ J ·~· !1! !!"'n m ·,:: .. , •; ~· ---, I I I I I 7 I I I I I I I I I =--~ NCH SEATING, LED UNDER G OAK TREES I I I I I I I I I _j IBEES_ J;QOC = BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ill REMARKS 0 LN 27 Lagerstroemia indica 'Natchez' 'Natchez' Crape Myrtle 15 gal 8'-10· Minimum 3 trunks; full head 0 LT Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree 0 0 0 MA QV TD 33 11 Magnolia virginiana Quercus virginiana Taxodium distichum Sweetbay Magnolia Southern Live Oak Bald Cypress filIB!.!!§ = = BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME @ MC3 19 Myrie □ cerifera Common Wax Myrtle 0 AG 24 Rhododendron 'George Tabor' George Tabor Azalea 0 SB 20 Viburnum odoratissimum Sweet Viburnum ~ = = 6QTANICAI NAME COMMON NAME 0 SB3 15 Tripsacum dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass = = BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME MS 8 Miscanthus sinensis 'Adagio' Adagio Maiden Grass = = BQTANICAI NAME COMMON NAME DV 89 Dietes vegeta White African Iris QUANTITIES NOTED ON PLANS ARE OFFERED AS A CONVENIENCE TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. GENERAi CONPITIQNS CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO ACQUAINT HIMSELF WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AT ALL TIMES. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SAFE STAGING AREA WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL, INCLUDING GRASS, FOR 365 CONSECUTIVE CALENDAR DAYS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF THE WORK, AS DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL AREAS IMPACTED NEGATIVELY BY CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES SHALL BE RETURNED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. LANDSCAPE AREA PLANTING SOIL PR EPARATION PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE CREATED BY AMENDING IN-PLACE OR STRIPPED ON-SITE TOPSOIL WITH THE ADDITION OF COMPOST. COMPOST SHALL BE MUSHROOM COMPOST OR DECOMPOSED WOOD DERIVATIVES, AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY LA PRIOR TO PURCHASE. COMPOST SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED OVER PLANTING AREAS AT AN AVERAGE DEPTH OF 1.5 INCHES AND OVER SOD AREAS AT AN A\ERAGE DEPTH OF 3/4 INCH. INCORPORATE UNIFORMLY IN PLANTING AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES AND IN SOD AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 3 INCHES USING A ROTARY OR SPADING TILLER OR OTHER APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT. PRE-PLANT FERTILIZER AND PH ADJUSTING AGENTS (E.G., LIME AND SULFUR) MAY BE APPLIED IN CONJUNCTION WITH COMPOST INCORPORATION, AS REQUIRED PER SOIL TEST (IF REQUESTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE). RAKE SOIL SURFACE SMOOTH PRIOR TO PLANTING. REMOVE STONES LARGER THAN 1 INCH IN ANY DIMENSION AND STICKS, ROOTS, RUBBISH, AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATTER AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF THEM OFF OWNER'S PROPERTY. WATER THOROUGHLY AFTER PLANTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING 3% POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING BEDS. ANY OTHER PROPOSED DRAINAGE METHODS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH PLANTING EFFORTS TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS AND MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. Pl ANT MATERIAi AND Pl ANTING PLANT QUANTITIES ARE OFFERED AS A CONVENIENCE TO THE CONTRACTOR, AND ARE NOT ABSOLUTE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLANT COUNT FROM PLAN AND REPORT DIFFERENCES. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OR REFUSAL BY THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT ANY TIME FROM INSTALL THROUGH WARRANlY PERIOD. PLANTS SHALL BE WELL FORMED, VIGOROUS, GROWING SPECIMENS WITH GROWTH lYPICAL OF VARIETIES SPECIFIED AND SHALL BE FREE FROM INJURY, INSECTS AND DISEASES. PLANTS SHALL EQUAL OR SURPASS QUALllY AS DEFINED IN THE CURRENT ISSUE OF "AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK" AS PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN NURSERYMEN, INC. UNLESS NOTED SPECIFICALLY, ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN. NO PRUNING SHOULD BE PERFORMED DURING FIRST GROWING SEASON EXCEPT FOR REMOVING DAMAGED OR DEAD GROWTH. WOUND PAINT SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL PLANTING AREAS, TREE PITS, AND OTHER AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH A SETTLED LAYER OF THE INDICATED MULCH: □ 3" DEPTH PINE BARK □ 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ~ 3" DEPTH LONG LEAF PINESTRAW, SffiLED TRENCH EDGE TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN ALL PLANTING AREAS AND LAWN, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. TREE STAKING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO KEEP TREES PLUMB AND PROTECTED FROM EXCESSIVE WINDS. ALL TREE-STAKING APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF THE ONE-YEAR WARRANlY PERIOD. ONE YEAR OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER UNDER SEPARATE COVER AS AN OPTIONAL SERVICE ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION. 1" GUYLINE WEBBING TRENCH EDGE, RE: DETAIL FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 15 gal 2"Cal 8'-10· Full head, specimen quality 15 gal 8'-10· 3 trunks; Full head 15 gal 2"Cal 8'-10· Full head, specimen quality 15 gal 2"Cal 8'-10· Full head, specimen quality = ill '!:!. ~ REMARKS 3 gal 72" o.c. Shrub form, full to ground 3 gal 60" o.c. 3 gal 48" o.c. = ill '!:!. ~ REMARKS 3 gal 72" o.c. = ill '!:!. = REMARKS 3 gal 42" o.c. = ill = REMARKS 1 gal 24" o.c. ARBORGUY TREE ANCHOR SYSTEM, INSTALL APPROPRIATE MODEL PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS ARROWHEAD ANCHOR FINISHED GRADE SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1/2" HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. J NISHED GRADE SHRUBS. =:t_ L- SPECIFIED PLANTING MIX. WATER AND TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS TREE Pl ACE~EI\IT NOJFS· 1.) ALL TREES SHALL BE 15 GAL AND/OR 1.S--2.5" DIA AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. 2.) TREES SHALL BE PLANTED EVERY 25' FROM INTERSECTIONS. A TREE SHALL BE PLANTED ONE PER LOT OR AT LEAST EVERY 5D FEET, BUT NO CLOSER THAN 10'. DEVELOPER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO UTILIZE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. J.) TREE SPECIES AND TREE PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY HORllCUL lURIST. 4.) All. TREES SHALL BE PRUNED SO THAT NOT FOIJAGE, LIMBS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS EXISTING BETY!EEN 2.5 AND 10 FEET FROM ADJACENT STREET GRADE. 5.) IN AREAS WHERE PLANTING STRIPS ARE OPllONAL AND NOT PROVIDED, SIDEWALKS TEN FEET OR GREATER SHALL PROVIDE 4'X4' TREE WELLS ALONG THE CURB SO THE TREES MAY BE PLANTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS. 6.) PER TREE ORDINANCE, SMAU. TREES WILL BE PLANTED IN BETY!EEN WALK AND CURB AREAS LESS THAN 5 FEET. MEDIUM TREES CAN BE PLANTED BETWEEN 5-7 FEET AND LARGE GROWING TREES CAN BE PLANTED IF AREA BETY!EEN WALK AND CURB IS 7 FEET OR MORE (SEE ORDINANCE FOR UST). 7.) DEVELOPER SHAU. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING TREES PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION ACCEPTANCE ANO DURING 2-YEAR MAINTENANCE PERIOD. TREE PROTEC]ON NOJfS· 1.) TREES IN EXCESS OF 20" IN DIAMETER ARE CONSIDERED PROTECTED AND SHALL RECEII/E THE TREE PROTECTION AS DETAILED ON THIS SHEET. NO DIGGING TRENCHING OR OTHER SOIL DISlURBANCE SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE FENCED AREA. 2.) TREES SHALL NOT BE REMOI/ED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE aF PERMIT TO DO SO. THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE UTILIZED THE FOLLOWING RESTilUllON REQUIREMENTS FOR TREES THAT ARE REMOVED WITHOUT A PERMIT. J.) ANY PERSON WISHING TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE A SIGNIFICANT TREE SHALL MAKE A 'M.:ITTEN APPUCAllON WITH THE CITY HORTICULlURIST. THE APPUCAllON SHALL INCLUDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE CITY HORTICUL lURIST MUST APPROVE OR DENY THE PERMIT WITHIN 14 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF APPUCAllON. DISTIJRBFD AREA NOTES: ANY DISlURBED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE APPROPRIATE SOIL STABILIZATION MATERIAL AS NECESSARY. = STAKE TO FIRST BRANCHES AS NECESSARY FOR FIRM SUPPORT WIRE SHALL NOT TOUCH OR RUB ADJACENT TRUNKS OR BRANCHES ,,-2 STRAND 12 GAUGE // GALV. WIRE TWISTED AND / ~~~~s~~~~ ;~oB:E:op OF I I STAKE. 2 WIRE SUPPORTS SHALL BE USED ON MAIN STRUCTURAL TRUNK. 2" x 2" HARDWOOD STAKES DRIVEN FIRMLY A MINIMUM OF 18" INTO THE SUBGRADE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 3" MULCH 1-,-~ 1=1 -·. -1=1 I - • -FORM SAUCER WITH 3" = = I =I l=lil=l 11 111=1 -CONTINUOUS RIM '-::I = l::::;ll;:;;lll~I ;::: ,-._ ----SPECIFIED PLANTING MIX. I 2X BALL DIA. ~~~~~t~~R T~~6K~S. Q,._,. 329399-01 o-,-.-_-,-._-o-----------------32_9_3_43_.2_6 ___ 0_2 Q,-1/-2-.-_-,.-_-o-· ---------------32_9_3_43 ___ 0_1 landscape architects OO@'ij'~ ~ THESE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ... .e 5i a: 1: al Cl) ~ E C. i 0 l < (D C. 0 Cl) -E C. ~ ~ U) "O ~ c( Re,I ____ ----------- No. Date Revisions / Submissions _ 01.28.20 _CrIY_S_UB_M_ITT_A_L _____ _ _ 02.21.20 ~CrIY_S_UB_M_ITT_A_L _____ _ _ 03.20.20 ~CrIY~S~UB=M~ITT~A~L _____ _ _ 06.12.20 _CrIY_S_UB_M_ITT_A_L _____ _ _ 07.09.20 ~CrIY~S~UB~M=ITT~A~L _____ _ --------------- SJW ,...,, LCW Checked 192027-037 Project. No. 01.28.20 Sheet T1tle OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN ShNt No. LP100 GREEN SPACE1.34 ACRES(58,270 S.F.)(50' R.O.W.)GREEN SPACE0.65 ACRE(28,474 S.F.)LOT 42COMMERCIAL(0.45 AC.)TOTAL PROPERTY AREA = 12.63 ACRES (550,252 S.F.)GREEN SPACE PROVIDED = 2.53 ACRES (110,139 S.F.) (20%)LOTS: 41L.F. STREETS = 1,845 L.F.GREEN SPACE REQ'D: = 2.53 ACRES (20%)MAIL KIOSK00 30'60'Park Stonelandscape architecture land planning placemaking Foley, Alabama P. 251.948.7181 Mobile, Alabama P. 251.344.4023 Jackson, Mississippi P. 601.790.0781 www.was-design.com N O R T HLANDSCAPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN1 WOOD FENCE 4.89'(S) 0.3f(\\'L_____ N89"22'35''W 15.89'(ACT.) N89 '19'Qll(s\!,'. &5p\J8'(REC.) WATERMAIN - @ E ISTING OAK TREES I I I I I I ______ I_ ______ __J hsS.:ca;;.1.;:-, ?1•C:_:-330ol' __________________________________________________________________________________ _!L....~-~=~~~~I rn ~,~41 ~~ii, DESIGN landscape architects OO@'ij'~ ~ THESE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE . ... .e 5i a: 1: al Cl) ~ E C. i 0 l < (D C. Cl) 0 C. -E ~ ~ U) 'O ~ c( ..,,_ ----------- No. Date Revisions / Submissions -----~----- -01.28.20 _C_rIY_S_UB_MITT_A~L ___ _ _ 02.21.20 _C=rIY_S_UB_MITT_A~L ___ _ _ 03.20.20 _C=rIY~S=UB=MITT=AecL ___ _ _ 06.12.20 _C_rIY_S_UB_MITT_A=L ___ _ _ 07.09.20 _C=rIY=S=UB=MITT=A=L ___ _ ----------- SJW ,...,, LCW Checked 192027-037 Project No. 01.28.20 oat, Sheet T1tle LANDSCAPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN ShNt No. LP200 LORIS WAY (50' R/W)DET.POND 2GREEN SPACE0.88 ACRE(38,332 S.F.)TREADSTONE WAY(50' R/W)DET.POND 100 30'60'Park Stonelandscape architecture land planning placemaking Foley, Alabama P. 251.948.7181 Mobile, Alabama P. 251.344.4023 Jackson, Mississippi P. 601.790.0781 www.was-design.com N O R T HLANDSCAPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN1 \ EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING Scale: 1 • -30' \~ I co '° ~ :..__,_ l.0¥----!, ►;o' ore C" 0 ~"--- --------- C.M.F. N LINK FENC E--- W) ~,~41 1l~~ DESIGN landscape architects OO@'ij'~ ~ THESE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ... .e 5i a: 1: al Cl) ~ E C. i 0 l < (D C. Cl) 0 C. -E ~ ~ U) "O ~ c( Re,1-----=---,----- No. Date Revisions / Submissions _ 01.28.20 ~C=rIY=SUB=MITT=AL~--- -02.21.20 ~C=rIY=SUB=MITT=AL~--- -03.20.20 _,C"'-'-rIY_,,,,SU=BMITT=AL'-------- -06.12.20 ~C=rIY=SU=BMITT=AL~--- -07.09.20 ~C=rIY=SU=BMITT=AL~--- SJW ,...,, LCW Checked 192027 037 Project No. 01.28.20 oat, Sheet T1tle LANDSCAPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN ShNt No. LP201 (50' R.O.W.) 00 30'60'Park Stonelandscape architecture land planning placemaking Foley, Alabama P. 251.948.7181 Mobile, Alabama P. 251.344.4023 Jackson, Mississippi P. 601.790.0781 www.was-design.com N O R T HLANDSCAPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN1 WOOD FENCE 0.22'(N) ---------------- Scale: 1 • -30' S88'43'30"E 434.1 0'(REC.) ' ' " 06' ACT. I I 1 N89 '16'49"W 1545.07'(ACT.) j_ N89 '37'22''W 154 1 5.07'(REC.) -------y---- POINT OF BEGINNING ~,~41 ~~[ii, DESIGN landscape architects OO@'ij'~ ~ THESE PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE . ... .e 5i a: 1: al Cl) ~ E C. i 0 < l ~ 0 Cl) -E C. ~ ·a LL U) "O ~ c( Re,I __ _ No. Date Revisions / Submissions ---___cc:::.__----'------ _ 01.28.20 -=CIIY-'--=SU=BM=ITT=AL~---- -_02_.21_.2_0 ----""CIIY-'--=SU=BM=ITT=AL~---- _ 03.20.20 ---'C"-'IIY!..cSe,,UBe,MeclTTAecL ____ _ _ 06.12.20 _C=IIY~S=U=BM=ITT=AL ____ _ _ 07.09.20 _C=IIY~=SU=BM=ITT=AL ____ _ ----------- SJW ,...,, LCW Checked 192027-037 Project No. 01.28.20 oat, Sheet T1tle LANDSCAPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENT PLAN ShNt No. LP202 Zoned TR SECTION STBELLRDTWIN BEECH RD HELENAPORTE RLN BRACY LNMALONE RDDENTON LNCUBAN LILY DR BRODBECK LN City of FairhopePlanning Commission August 3, 2020 ¯ SECTION STSD 20.33 - Hill Top Subdivision Legend COF Corp. Limits COF Planning Jurisdiction COF Zoning TR - Tourist Resort ¯ ¯ ^ Project Name: Hilltop Subdivison Phase 1Site Data: 29 lots / 21.75 acres totalProject Type: Final Plat Jurisdiction: Fairhope Planning, Police, and Permit JurisdictionsZoning District: Unzoned Baldwin County Planning District 17PPIN Number: 19829General Location: 1,000 ft south of Twin Beech Road along west side of S. Section StreetSurveyor of Record: Mark A. Wattier, PLSEngineer of Record: Trey Jinright, PE, LEED APOwner / Developer: Two Hands Design & Development, LLCSchool District: Fairhope Elementary Schools, Fairhope Middle and High SchoolRecommendation: Approve with conditionsPrepared by: J. Buford King, Development Services Manager   1                                                          SD 20.33 Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 Final Plat  – August 3, 2020  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Jade Consulting on behalf of Twin Hands Design and  Development, LLC for approval of the final plat of Hilltop Subdivision Phase One; a twenty‐nine (29) lot  major subdivision. The subject property is located on the west side of South Section Street (Baldwin  County Highway No. 3) approximately 1,000ft south of County Road 44 (Twin Beech Road).  Subject  property consists of approximately 21.175 acres, the smallest lot 15,000 square feet and the average lot  19,619 sf. Mr. Trey Jinright, PE, LEED AP of Jade Consulting serves as the engineer of record (EOR) for  subject development with additional staff work provided by Mr. Lee Rambo.   Comments:    The subject site is Phase 1 of 2 of the Hilltop Subdivision Development. Phase 2 received  preliminary plat approval on March 2, 2020 and contains eight (8) lots for a total of  thirty seven (37) total lots in both phases. A construction schedule for Phase 2 is not  known as of this writing.     Subject property is located in unzoned Baldwin County within planning district 17   The Final Plat Checklist is included as a supporting document.  All items identified by the  Planning Department have been addressed by the applicant.    The developer has indicated to staff an interest in annexing subject property into the  City of Fairhope.  The lot size and width of subject property appears to be consistent  with R‐1 Residential Single Family Zoning District, which is the “default “zoning district  for direct annexation appeals to the City Council.  It is not known as of this writing if the  annexation, if requested, will be a direct appeal to the City Council or a conditional  annexation to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council.  If the  applicant requests annexation, staff will coordinate with the applicant, as necessary  because the annexation will likely alter the resolution of dedication of improvements as  well as result in a new maintenance bond in a larger dollar amount to include ROWs in  addition to utilities.     The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. “Approval Standards”. Each of  these criteria is addressed below with either a “meets” or “does not meet” comment.  If any of the criteria  is not met, a denial will be recommended.    “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s  Zoning ordinance, where applicable;  Meets  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a  Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;  Meets  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;  Meets  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and  regulations; or    2                                                          SD 20.33 Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 Final Plat  – August 3, 2020  Meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”  Meets      Site Photos:                               Looking east from Petiole Drive toward  South Section Street   Looking southwest toward common area  #3 with Lot 29 Beyond  Looking south along west side of South  Section Street toward pedestrian bridge  Looking east along Petiole Drive toward  lot 25    3                                                          SD 20.33 Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 Final Plat  – August 3, 2020  Enlarged Aerial Map:                    SECTION STNORTH    4                                                          SD 20.33 Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 Final Plat  – August 3, 2020    Enlarged Zoning Map:        Follow‐Up Activities Required by Staff and the Applicant:  Condition of approval # 2 memorializes the listed follow‐up procedures required of staff and the  applicant:  1. Applicant shall furnish to staff a copy of the recorded final plat AND a copy of the recorded  stormwater Operations and Maintenance Agreement.  a. The final plat must be recorded in the Judge of Probate’s office within sixty (60) days  of final plat approval by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission, or the final plat  approval is null and void.    b. Upon receipt of items included in “a” above, staff will prepare a DRAFT resolution of  dedication of the improvements to be dedicated to the City of Fairhope and transmit  the DRAFT resolution to the City Clerk for editing and inclusion on a future City Council  meeting agenda for adoption by the Fairhope City Council.   i. The Mayor of the City of Fairhope will execute the resolution of dedication as  well as the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement upon adoption.   Zoned TR SECTION STBELLRDTWIN BEECH RD HELENAPORTE RLN BRACY LNMALONE RDDENTON LNCUBAN LILY DR BRODBECK LN Legend COF Corp. Limits COF Planning Jurisdiction COF Zoning TR - Tourist Resort NORTH    5                                                          SD 20.33 Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 Final Plat  – August 3, 2020  ii. The City Clerk will serve as the custodian of the Maintenance and Guaranty  Agreement, Maintenance Bond, Subdivision Performance Bond Agreement, and  Subdivision Performance Bond until release of bonds by staff.     2. Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement Expiration   a. Two years from the effective date (date executed by mayor)  b. Forms for the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement and Maintenance Bond will be  furnished to the applicant in electronic form upon approval of Case # SD 20.33 by the  Planning Commission  c. The principal for the Maintenance Bond shall submit the Maintenance Bond within thirty  (30) days of the effective date of the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement or the  obligation of the City to accept the improvements for maintenance shall terminate and  be of no further force or effect.    3. Subdivision Performance Bond Agreement Expiration  a. Matches the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement time period and effective date  b. Forms for the Subdivision Performance Bond Agreement and Subdivision Performance  Bond will be furnished to the applicant in electronic form upon approval of Case # SD  20.33 by the Planning Commission  c. The developer wishes to install landscaping and sidewalks during the 2‐year  maintenance period and in lieu of installation will provide a Subdivision Performance  Bond. The bond must be submitted within thirty (30) days of final plat approval or the  final plat approval is null and void.    4. Stormwater O&M Inspections  a. First inspection shall be complete by City of Fairhope staff by December 31, 2025  b.  Subsequent inspections shall be complete by City of Fairhope staff by December 31st  every successive fifth year following the initial inspection   5. Possible annexation into the City of Fairhope   a.  Staff will coordinate annexation activities with the developer if an annexation is  requested.   i. A conditional annexation will be considered by the Planning Commission and  City Council  ii. A “direct” annexation will be considered solely by the City Council   b.  The improvements to be dedicated to the City of Fairhope may be expanded to include  streets and drainage (inside ROWs) and will be reflected in the schedule of Values  (SOVs) as well as the Maintenance Bond and Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement as a  function of the resolution of dedication                   6                                                          SD 20.33 Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 Final Plat  – August 3, 2020      Recommendation:  Staff recommends APPROVAL of case # SD 20.33, Hilltop Subdivision Phase 1 contingent upon  satisfaction of the following conditions preceding application of signatures to the final plat:     1. Common Area #3   a. The  portion of common area #3 between lots 3 and 4, as well as the portion of common  area #3 southeast of lots 3 through 5 adjacent to the entirety of the length of lots 3  through 5 shall be leveled and improved with adequate material to support the weight  of a class 8 motor vehicle.   b. Revise the “for construction” landscape drawings as needed to accommodate the  vehicle access described in “b” above.         2. Completion of any and all punch list items to the satisfaction of City of Fairhope staff  a. The Code Enforcement Officer will conduct one additional erosion control inspection to  make certain the site is adequately stabilized prior to final plat signatures           3. Memorialize the required follow‐up activities required of staff and the applicant as described in  the preceding section.   CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TWO HANDS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, LLC IS THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON, AND THAT THE SAME HAS CAUSED SAID LAND TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDl\'1DED AS INDICATED HEREON, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES HEREIN SET FORTH, AND DO HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SAME UNDER THE DESIGN AND TITLE HEREON INDICATED; AND GRANT ALL EASEMENTS AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, WALKS, PARKS AND OTHER OPEN SPACES TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED, TOGETHER l'<iTH SUCH RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS NOTED BELOW OR ATTACHED IN A SEPARATE LEGAL DOCUMENT. DATED THIS ___ DAY OF _______ _ OWNER CERTIFICATION BY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN 2020. I, ------------~ A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE AND COUNTY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ~=~=~==~~=== WHOSE NAME AS __________ OF TWO HANDS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND WHO IS KNOWN TO ME, ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY, THAT BEING INFORMED OF THE CONTENTS OF THE INSTRUMENT, AND AS SUCH OFFICER AND l'<iTH FULL AUTHORITY, EXECUTED THE SAME YOLUNTARIL Y FOR AND AS THE ACT OF SAID CORPORATION. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTORIAL SEAL THIS ____ DAY OF _______ _ NOTARY PUBLIC SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE STA TE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN 2020. I, MARK A. WATTIER, A LICENSED SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAYE SURVEYED THE PROPERTY OF TWO HANDS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SITUATED IN BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'-04'-39" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 A DISTANCE OF 979.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'-54'-50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A 1/2" REBAR ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF S. SECTION STREET (AKA COUNTY HIGHWAY NO. 3)(80' R/W), SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE FOLL0\\1NG DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'-54'-50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 621.70 FEET TO A CAPPED REBAR (CA0092LS); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'-07'-17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 104.09 FEET TO A CAPPED REBAR (WATTIER); THENCE RUN NORTH 89'-58'-08" WEST A DISTANCE OF 201.55 TO A CAPPED REBAR (WATTIER); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'-01'-52" WEST A DISTANCE OF 29.45 FEET TO A CAPPED REBAR (WATTIER); THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'-53'-32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET TO A CAPPED REBAR (WATTIER) ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTIER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'-16'-36" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 645.05 FEET TO A CRIMP TOP PIPE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'-41'-54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1,284.76 FEET TO A CAPPED REBAR (KOUNTZ) ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID S. SECTION STREET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00'-03'-43" EAST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 787.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 21.175 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AND THAT THE PLAT OR MAP CONTAINED HEREON IS A TRUE AND CORRECT MAP SHOWING THE SUBDIVISION INTO WHICH THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IS DIVIDED, GIVING THE LENGTH AND BEARINGS OF THE BOUNDARIES OF EACH LOT AND EASEMENT AND ITS NUMBER, AND SHOWING THE STREETS, ALLEYS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS, AND Gl\'1NG THE BEARINGS, LENGTH, WlDTH AND NAMES OF THE STREETS. SAID MAP FURTHER SHOWS THE RELATION OF THE LAND SO PLATTED TO THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY, AND THAT PERMANENT MONUMENTS HAYE BEEN PLACED AT POINTS MARKED THUS (0) AS HEREON SHOWN. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT ALL PARTS OF THIS SURVEY AND DRAWING HAYE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF. WITNESS MY HAND THIS THE ____ DAY OF _______ 2020. SURVEYOR _____________ _ ALABAMA LICENSE #20364 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALD\\1N I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA HOLDING CERTIFICATE NUMBER 25748 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAYE DESIGNED THE WITHIN IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFORMITY WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND LAWS AND WlTH THE PRINCIPALS OF GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I HAYE OBSERVED THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WlTHIN IMPROVEMENTS, THAT THE SAME CONFORMS TO MY DESIGN, THAT THE WITHIN IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AS INSTALLED AND THAT SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE HEREBY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA. PROJECT ENGINEER DATE NAME OF PROJECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE APPLIES PLANS WHICH ARE CERTIFIED CONSIST OF PAGE ____ THRU ____ , EACH OF WHICH BEARS MY SEAL AND SIGNATURE. J.O. NO. 19-0309 COMP. FILE 2541, DWG. NO. 6S-2E-30-05 F.B. NO. 71-72 I CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION THE WlTHIN PLAT OF THE HILL TOP SUBDIVISION, PHASE ONE, FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA IS HEREBY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THIS THE DAY OF 2020 CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER THE UNDERSIGNED, AS COUNTY ENGINEER OF THE COUNTY OF BALDl'<iN, ALABAMA, HEREBY APPROVES THE l'<iTHIN PLAT FOR RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWlN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ______ DAY OF ________ 2020 COUNTY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY RIVIERA UTILITIES: THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY Rl\'1ERA UTILITIES, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWlN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ______ DAY OF ________ 2020. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES: THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES, HEREBY APPROVES THE WlTHIN PLAT FOR RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ______ DAY OF ________ 2020 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES GAS DEPARTMENT: THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES GAS DEPARTMENT, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ______ DAY OF ________ 2020 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY AT&T: THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY AT&T, HEREBY APPROVES THE WlTHIN PLAT FOR RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ______ DAY OF ________ 2020 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY BALDWIN COUNTY 911: THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY BALDWIN COUNTY 911, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ______ DAY OF ________ 2020. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ENGINEER: JADE CONSULTING, LLC. P.O. BOX 1929; FAIRHOPE, AL 36533 251-928-3443 SURVEYOR: WATTIER SURVEYING, INC. 4321 DOWNTOWNER LOOP NORTH, STE 201 MOBILE, AL 36609 251-342-2640 DEVELOPER/OWNER: TWO HANDS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 6567 HAWTHORNE LANE; FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 251-209-7135 FLOOD CERTIFICATE: THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON IS SHOWN ON THE FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATIE MAP NUMBERS 01003C0756 M AND 01003C0757 M, DATED 04/19/2019, AND IS SHOWN TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE "X-UNSHADED. SITE DATA CURRENT ZONING: LINEAR FEET OF STREETS: NUMBER OF LOTS: SMALLEST LOT SIZE: AVERAGE LOT SIZE: COMMON AREAS: TOTAL AREA: SITE DENSITY: UNZONED BALDWlN COUNTY 3,044 LF 29 15,000 SF 19,619 SF 5.018 AC 21.175 AC 1.37 LOTS/ACRE LOT UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (EXCEPT AS OTHERl'<iSE SHOWN) FRONT & REAR: 15' SIDE: 15' (7.5' EACH SIDE) LOT SIDEWALK EASEMENT (EXCEPT AS OTHERl'<iSE SHOWN) FRONT 6' REQUIRED SETBACKS (EXCEPT AS OTHERl'<iSE SHOWN) FRONT: 30' REAR: 30' SIDE: 10' SIDE STREET: 20' UTILITIES WATER, SEWER & GAS: FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES 555 SOUTH SECTION ST., FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 JAY WHITMAN (251) 928-8003 ELECTRICAL: Rl\'1ERA UTILITIES 413 E. LAUREL AVE, FOLEY, AL 36536 SCOTT SLIGH (251) 943-5001 TELEPHONE: AT&T 2155 OLD SHELL ROAD, MOBILE, AL 36607 WADE MITCHELL (251) 471-8361 HILL TOP SUBDIVISION PHASE ONE PLAT OF SUBDIVISION SHEET 2 OF 2 JULY 16, 2020 WATTIER SURVEYING, INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 4321 Downtowner Loop N., Suite 201 MobHe, Alabama 36609 251-342-2640 FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 1 Date of review: June 18, 2020 Date of Follow-Up Review: July 22, 2020 Project: SD 20.33 Hilltop Phase 1 Final Plat Request The following review checklist is derived from various components of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and/or staff recommendations. Additional comments may be depicted on “marked-up” plans. Level of acceptance is indicated with an “x” in the checkboxes below. Missing or outstanding items, or items requiring revision and resubmission are further described in the comments section of each item. All comments are indicated in bold italic text. Final Plat Submission Requirements Article IV, Section D.3. Staff Review 3. Staff Review – Applicants for a final plat shall first submit the final plat and plans to the Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent for staff’s review. The Director shall determine if the submittals meet all of the requirements of Section D.1., above. Incomplete, partial, or inaccurate submittals will not be accepted, but will be returned to applicant for re-submission for a later hearing. Staff shall review the application and provide comments to the applicant. Following staff review and comments the applicant shall make a formal application for submittal to and review by the Planning Commission. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(19) Final Plat and Final Plans Final Plat Review Commentary: This section may be invoked if the application for final plat is incomplete or contains errors that rise to the level that the application is recommended for denial, tabled, or held over to a future meeting. Comments: Article IV, Section D.1. Two (2) copies of the final plat and all plans for initial final plat review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1 Final Plat Application Checklist ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.a. Maintenance Bond a. Either a financial guaranty (in the form of a maintenance bond) in an amount and form acceptable to the City Council as a guarantee for the installation of required improvements or the determination of the City's General Superintendent that all required improvements have been installed to the City's requirements. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up information required Final Plat Review Commentary: The maintenance bond amount will be 30% of the total cost of the schedule of values prepared by the engineer of record (see Fairhope Municipal Code 19-2(f) bond requirements). The maintenance bond will be for two years and include a City of Fairhope bond form with the surety information attached. Also, a Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement, also on a City of Fairhope form, must be included (signed by the applicant) and will be executed by the Mayor after final plat approval at the time the City Council accepts the dedication of all the infrastructure into the City. Note the contractor installing the improvements provides the maintenance bond (the developer provides any performance bonds). Comments: This review assumes a maintenance bond in the amount of $102,511.50 as well as the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement will be submitted after final plat approval by the Planning I I I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 2 Commission is attained. The staff report will contain a section listing all follow-up items required by the applicant as well as staff, and those follow-up activities will be memorialized as a condition of approval. Only water and sewer infrastructure is to be dedicated to the City of Fairhope – all other improvements are dedicated to Baldwin County. Engineer’s comments: Executed Maintenance & Guaranty Agreement and Maintenance Bond will be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Enclosed are drafts of the Agreement and Bond. Also enclosed is the revised maintenance bond estimate to include the installed common area sidewalks. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(1) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (1) Location of all blocks and lots with numbers in final numerical order. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(2) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (2) Sufficient data to determine and reproduce on the ground the location, bearing, and length of every road line, block line, boundary line, building line shown to nearest 1/100 foot and bearings in the nearest 15 seconds. Includes radius of arc, central angle, length of tangent and length of curve for the centerline of roads and streets and for all property lines. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: The final plat itself should satisfy this requirement. Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(3) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (3) Storm water culverts and appurtenances, their sizes, and locations. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: The as-built drawings should satisfy this requirement. Comments: Storm system schedules shown on drawing C11. (To be dedicated to Baldwin County) Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(4) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (4) Street Tree Plan shall be submitted showing the location of all planted street trees. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Follow-up information required Final Plat Review Commentary: The Horticulturalist must conduct an inspection and provide a list of review comments or punch list of any trees that were installed (usually in common areas) that require replacement. See Article V, Section D.5.a.(8) for an explanation of the performance bond process for street trees not installed at the final plat stage. Comments: Landscape Plan, including street tree plan by WAS Design was submitted. A letter of credit in the amount of $13,537.50 has been requested in lieu of installation of street trees at the time of final plat. Review comments by the City of Fairhope Horticulturalist for in-place landscaping in common areas will follow under separate cover, however it appears no landscaping has been installed at the time of this writing. This review assumes all landscaping will be installed and signatures to the final plat approved only after acceptance of landscaping by the COF Horticulturalist. Engineer’s Response: Due to the ongoing gas and electric utility Installation. The common area landscape will not be installed prior to the Planning commission meeting on August 3rd'. Enclosed Is an updated performance bond estimate and draft I I I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 3 Subdivision Performance Bond Agreement. Performance bond to include the lot sidewalks, street trees, and common area landscaping. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(5) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (5) Final plans and calculations for utility layouts. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: The as-built drawings should satisfy this requirement. Comments: Plan and profiles are depicted on drawings C11 through C18. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(6) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (6) Location and descriptions of monuments at block corners and iron pins at lot corners. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(7) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (7) Delineation on plans or plat of clear sight triangles as required by Article V., Section D.5.b.(5). ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V., Section D.5.b.(5). The final plat process assumes this item was reviewed at the preliminary plat stage and the preliminary plat approval is mirrored in the final plat request. Comments: Subject application is not a traditional lot and block subdivision and contains radiused transition in lieu of perpendicular corners. This review assumes clear sight triangles were vetted during the preliminary plat process and the street tree plan reflects the vetting process – street trees will be installed during the two year warranty period and covered by a letter of credit. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(8) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (8) Owner and Lien-Holders Certificates of Dedications for Streets or other public use. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(9) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (9) Where streets stubs are provided, said stubs shall provide access to abutting properties. The applicant shall include a note on the plat providing notice that said stub shall provide future access to abutting properties. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: Cross-reference Article V, Section D.3.e. and note the street stub signage requirements. Comments: Please add the note required by this section to the street stub between lots 15 and 16. Engineer’s response: Note added to revised plat. I I I I I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 4 Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(10) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (10) Certificate for Planning Commission Approval. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(11) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (11) Surveyor’s Certificate on Plat, Engineer’s Seal and Certificate on Plans. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(12) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (12) Provision for Recording Certificate. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: Currently, recording stamps are an adhesive decal applied to the plat and a dedicated space on the plat for the recording stamp is not necessarily required so long as the plat contains sufficient space for the recording stamp decal. Comments: Sufficient space is available on the plat for the recording stamp. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(13) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (13) Signature blocks for all utility providers. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Please include an individual signature block for Fairhope Public Utilities Gas Department. (Water and Sewer may share the same signature block, please identify clearly if listed together). Engineer’s Response: Signature block added to revised plat for gas department. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(14) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (14) Certificate for County Engineer’s approval for extra-territorial plats. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V, Section A. When lands proposed to be subdivided lie outside the corporate limits of the City, the minimum design standards of Baldwin County shall apply when such standards are more restrictive than those of the City. All approvals of the Commission shall be subject to the more restrictive requirements of Baldwin County and the approval of the County Engineer shall be a condition precedent to approval for construction of improvements. Not applicable inside the city limits. Comments: This signature block was labeled “City Engineer”. Please edit to reflect the County Engineer’s signature block. Engineer’s Response: Signature block corrected on revised plat. I I I I I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 5 Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(15) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (15) Site data table box including but not limited to: • Total acreage of site • Acreage of common area(s) • Total number of lots • Gross Floor Area of Buildings • Site Density • Number of units proposed. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Please add the site density to the site data table. Engineer’s Response: Site density added to data table on revised plat. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(16) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (16) Digital or video image(s) with date and time stamp of storm drains to ensure drainage structures are undamaged and free of debris and sediment. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(17) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (17) Maintenance Plan for maintenance of detention facilities during development and documents providing for continued maintenance after completion of development and sale of all lots. Such documents running as a covenant with the lands. Note the five (5) year inspection cycle in lieu of three (3) years. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V, Section F.3.a.(3) The Final Plat application will include a Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Agreement within which the Maintenance Plan is included. Comments: Please revise page 3 of the Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement to reflect a five year in lieu of three year inspection interval. (The inspection interval contemplated by Article V, Section F.3.a.(3)(a)(3) was change from three (3) years to (5) years). Please reflect this edit in the document that is recorded. Engineer’s Response: Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement inspection frequency revised to five years. I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 6 Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(18) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (18)The engineer shall perform the supervision of construction; the final plat shall have the following engineer’s certification: “ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATE” “I, the undersigned, a Registered Engineer in the State of Alabama holding Certificate Number ______, hereby certify that I have designed the within improvements in conformity with applicable codes and laws and with the principals of good engineering practice. I further certify that I have observed the construction of the within improvements, that the same conforms to my design, that the within is a true and accurate representation of improvements as installed and that said improvements are hereby recommended for acceptance by the City of Fairhope, Alabama. ____________________ Project Engineer ____________________ Date ____________________ Name of Project to which the Certificate Applies Plans which are certified consist of Page _____ thru _____, each of which bears by seal and signature.” ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Commentary: This statement must be included on the Final Plat, on the cover page of the As-Built drawings, and on the cover of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Agreement. Comments: Because the final plat and the O&M Plan and Agreement are recorded separately from the As-Built drawings, please added this engineer’s certificate to the final plat as well as to the cover of the O&M Plan and Agreement. It may be advantageous to make a cover page for plat so that sufficient room is available for all the signature blocks and this engineer’s certificate). Engineer’s Response: Plat revised to be two pages. Engineer's certificate added to revised plat and O&M agreement. Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(19) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (19) All final plans submitted on a digital copy of all plans in an ADOBE PDF format. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☒Follow-up information required Final Plat Review Commentary: 18 copies of the preliminary plat (reflecting any revisions) on 11x17 paper are required for inclusion in the Planning Commission packets. If any revisions to as-built drawings are required, one set of full-size as-built drawings is required as well. All drawings are also required in electronically in Adobe pdf format. Comments: Please provide 18 copies of the final plat on 11x17 paper in the follow-up submittal. (These copies are required for the Planning Commission packets). Complete I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 7 Article IV, Section D.2. Phased Plats 2. Phased Plats – A final plat that includes only a portion of the land area of an approved preliminary plat shall correspond to the phase lines on an approved preliminary plat. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section D.4. Final Inspections 4. Final Inspections – Applicants shall submit a letter of verification prepared by the Applicant’s engineer certifying that all punch list items from the final inspections have been satisfactorily completed. A fee of $1,000.00 will be charged for all re-inspections caused by incomplete punch lists. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up information pending Final Plat Review Commentary: Due to the time required to complete punch list items, it may be necessary to reflect completion of punch list items as a condition of approval. The Final Plat will not be signed until all punch list items are complete to the satisfaction of the various city departments and the letter mentioned above is furnished. Comments: At the time of this writing, field inspection of the development is in progress and thus a punch list has not yet been prepared. That punch list will follow under separate cover. All punch list items addressed and noted in the engineer’s response letter. Article IV, Section D.7. Recording 7. Recording – Applicant is responsible for recording of Plat and approval shall be null and void if the Plat is not recorded within sixty days after the date of final approval; provided, however, that the Commission may, on finding of good cause, extend that sixty day period. The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded plat; failure to do so shall result in the denial of the issuance of the building permits within the subdivision. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: For the applicant’s information. Article V, Section D.3.e. Street Standards – Street Layout a. Access to Adjacent Property - Street connections to abutting properties shall be provided at least at intervals not to exceed the maximum block length specified in Section D.4., by extension of a paved street that meets City construction requirements to the boundary of the abutting property. A temporary turnaround shall be provided for those streets subject to the following: (1) A circular turnaround with a diameter of 30 to 42 feet. If a center island is provided in the turnaround, the outside diameter shall be 45 feet with a 20 to 24-foot lane maintained at all times. Circular turnarounds may be designed to incorporate a future traffic circle or roundabout, as provided in Article V., Section D.5.h., when future streets will intersect at that point. (2) For extensions serving 5 lots or more, a cul-de-sac shall be required. Permanent dead-end streets shall not exceed 1,320 feet (1/4 mile) in length. Permanent dead-end streets with a pavement width of 20 feet or less shall be provided with a turnaround having a roadway diameter of at least 70 feet and a right- of-way diameter of at least 100 feet. Permanent dead-end streets with a pavement width of more than 20 feet shall be provided with a turnaround having a roadway diameter of at least 80 feet and a right-of-way diameter of at least 100 feet. At non-permanent dead-end street, provide a temporary turn-around with at least a 70’ diameter constructed with an all-weather surface. (3) For street extensions serving four or fewer lots, no temporary turnaround is required. (4) All access streets to adjacent property that are not connected at the time of the improvements shall be posted with a stop sign blank reading "Future Through Street.” The sign shall be posted by the Subdivider. ☒N/A with comments ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: This item is reviewed at preliminary plat but is also included in the final plat checklist to make certain any street stubs have the “Future Through Street” sign installed as required by item I I I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 8 (4) above. The public works review comments should note any missing ‘future through street” signs and clearly identify their locations. Comments: At the time of this writing, the future through street signs have not been installed and the paved future through street stub (Calyx Circle) has not been installed – this review assumes this non- installation is authorized by Baldwin County Highway Department. In order to satisfy COF subdivision regulations, the future through street signs are required. Engineer’s Response: Future Through Street sign was installed as required. Article V, Section D.3.f. Street Standards – Street Layout a. Streetlights - Street lights are to be paid for or installed by the developer at the time of development. Streetlights shall be approved by the Planning director and/or his/her authorized agent and the Electrical Superintendent. Pole height shall be no more than 15 feet from finished grade. The type and style of lights and poles will be determined and agreed upon by the developer and the utility provider. All other approvals, including the design layout of streetlights, will be granted by the electrical superintendent. The utility provider shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance of the streetlights. Outside the City of Fairhope, the homeowner’s association will be responsible for the maintenance, if applicable, and energy costs of the lights and this responsibility shall be noted on the plat. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐ Revise and Resubmit Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(12) Street lighting plan Final Plat Review Commentary: This item is reviewed at preliminary plat but is also included in the final plat checklist to make certain streetlights are installed, or assurance that streetlights will be installed through payment of aid-to-construction fees has been accomplished. The applicant must include a copy of a paid receipt to the appropriate electrical utility indicating the streetlight aid-to-construction fees are paid. In Fairhope this may be Fairhope Public Utilities, Riviera Utilities, or Baldwin EMC. Comments: Note “7” on the final plat memorializes the requirement that streetlights are maintained by, and energy costs provided by, the homeowner’s association. Streetlights are in place at the time of this writing. Article V, Section D.5.a.(8) Street Standards – Street Design – General Requirements – Street Trees Street trees shall be planted on center in all planting strips according to the following: (a) All trees shall be at least 15 gallons and/or 1.5” to 2.5” in diameter when planted; (b) Trees shall be planted at least every 25 feet from intersections. A tree shall be planted one per lot or at least every 50 feet, but no closer than 10 feet; (c) Tree species and tree placement shall be approved by the City Horticulturist; (d) All trees shall be pruned so that no foliage, limbs, or other obstructions exist between 2½ and 10 feet from the adjacent street grade; (e) In areas where planting strips are optional and not provided, sidewalks ten feet or greater shall provide 4’ x 4’ tree wells along the curb so that trees may be planted in conformance with these requirements. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Follow-up information forthcoming Final Plat Review Commentary: This item is reviewed at preliminary plat but is also included in the final plat checklist to make certain street trees are installed, or assurance that street trees will be installed through a subdivision performance bond. Similar to sidewalks covered by a subdivision performance bond, the bond amount must be 125% of the total cost of the schedule of values prepared by the engineer of record. Comments: This item is currently under review by the City of Fairhope (COF) Horticulturalist. The developer has requested to install these items during the two-year warranty period and has included the cost in their schedule of values to be included in the Subdivision Performance Bond. I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 9 Article V, Section D.6. Street Standards – Pedestrian Area Design Standards All streets shall include a pedestrian area comprised of a planting strip and a sidewalk, according to the standards in Table 5.3 in Appendix A. The developer may have the flexibility to construct the sidewalks within 2 years of final plat approval. A letter of credit guaranteeing the construction for 125% of the engineer’s estimate is required. At the end of 2 years, all sidewalks shall be completed by either the developer or City, using the letter of credit. The areas in which the sidewalks will be poured shall be graded and compacted at the time the subdivision infrastructure is constructed. The pedestrian area shall be designed according to the following minimum standards: a. All streets supporting residential land uses shall have a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk on each side of the street with the back edge of the sidewalk being the edge of the right-of-way. b. All streets supporting public institutions and public facilities land uses shall include a minimum 5-foot wide sidewalk and 8-foot wide planting strip on each side of the street. c. All streets supporting non-residential land uses including commercial, office, and mixed-use villages, shall have: (1) a minimum 15’ wide sidewalk, with tree wells according to Article V., Section D.5.a.8.(e) on each side of the street; or (2) a minimum 10’ wide sidewalk and minimum 6-foot wide planting strip on each side of the street. d. Sidewalks shall include curb ramps meeting accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities act at all intersections and any non-grade driveway or land intersecting the sidewalk. Article V, Section D.6. Street Standards – Pedestrian Area Design Standards (continued) e. Sidewalks shall be constructed of a minimum 4” concrete surface meeting City construction standards. Where applicable, sidewalk materials shall be used and constructed to encourage maximum tree preservation. f. Streets in rural and agricultural subdivisions meeting all requirements of Article V., Section D.7.c. and d. are not required to provide sidewalks. g. Where applicable, sidewalks shall be configured in a manner that provides for maximum tree preservation. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V. Section D.5.a.8.(e) and D.7.c and d. Final Plat Review Commentary: This item is reviewed at preliminary plat but is also included in the final plat checklist to make certain sidewalks are installed, or assurance that sidewalks will be installed through a subdivision performance bond. The bond amount must be 125% of the total cost of the schedule of values prepared by the engineer of record as described above. The building official will provide a punch list of any installed, defective sidewalks that must be repaired or replaced. Comments: Please clarify how installation of sidewalks will be accomplished. Will a performance bond or letter of credit for sidewalks be issued? The only reference to an LOC included in the submission was related to street trees and no schedule of values (SOVs) were included related to the cost of sidewalk installation. Please clarify via follow-up correspondence. Sidewalks must be installed within two years to satisfy this section of the COF subdivision regulations. Engineer’s Response: The owner respectfully requests that a performance bond be accepted for these lot sidewalks. An updated performance bond estimate is enclosed covering these lot sidewalks, street trees, and common area landscaping. These sidewalks will be installed by the individual homebuilder. Article VI, Section A. Construction Standards-General The sub-divider shall be required to install, or construct improvements hereinafter described prior to having released bond or other surety which guarantees the installation of such improvements. All improvements required shall be constructed in conformity with these regulations and in conformity with Chapter 19, Streets, Sidewalks, and Other Public Ways, of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Fairhope, as amended. All improvements shall be designed and sealed by a Project Engineer. The Project Engineer shall carry Errors and Omissions Insurance at a minimum coverage of at least $1,000,000. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: A copy of the engineer’s certificate of insurance must be included with the application for file purposes – make certain the certificate has not expired. Comments: I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 10 Article VI, Section C. Construction Standards-Curbs and Gutters Curbs and gutters shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring curb and gutter, either valley type or barrier type concrete curb and gutter which meets the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Curbs and gutters shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering practice. Face of curbs shall be not less than six inches in height. Backfill behind curbs shall slope to the back of the curb for drainage. Markings shall be added to the curb to indicate the location of water and sewer laterals. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Table 5.3, Appendix “A” City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations Final Plat Review Commentary: The water department should provide a list of any missing water and sewer curb markings for inclusion in the Planner’s review comments. The list should specify the lot number of the missing curb markings. The concrete cylinder tests mentioned at Article VI, Section K. are for the concrete used in the curbs and gutters of this section. Comments: This review assumes all curbs and gutters are in compliance with Baldwin County Highway Department requirements. Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering practice. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended, and Article V, Section D.6. Pedestrian Area Design Standard and note the performance bond provisions. Final Plat Review Commentary: Standard practice for major subdivisions has been to submit a subdivision performance bond to cover sidewalks not constructed at the time of final plat. The amount of the bond will be 125% of the total cost of the engineer of record’s schedule of values. The bond will include a City of Fairhope form with the surety information attached. The Building Official must conduct an inspection and provide a list of review comments or punch list of any sidewalks that were furnished that require repair or replacement (primarily ADA compliance). Also, cross reference Article V, Section D.5.a.(8) for performance bond information related to street trees. Comments: This review assumes all sidewalks installed or to be installed are in or will be in compliance with Baldwin County Highway Department requirements. Article VI, Section E.6. – 8. Construction Standards-Storm Water(Continued) 6. Warranty after Completion - All facilities subject to acceptance for maintenance by the public shall be warranted for a period of two years after date of acceptance by the developer. A surety bond guaranteeing such maintenance shall be a condition precedent to acceptance for maintenance by the governing body. 7. Applicability of General Law and Regulations - All plans and the Work shall fully conform to all rules, regulations, codes, laws, and ordinances which may reasonably apply thereto. In the event of conflict between provisions, the most restrictive provision shall apply. 8. As-Built Drawings – A copy of the construction as-built drawings stamped by the engineer shall be submitted to the Commission as verification that the project has been built in accordance with his or her design. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up information required Cross Reference: City Code Section 19-2(f) Maintenance Bond I I I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 11 Final Plat Review Commentary: The maintenance bond amount will be 30% of the total cost of the schedule of values prepared by the engineer of record. The maintenance bond will be on a City of Fairhope bond form with the surety information attached. Also, a Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement, also on a City of Fairhope form, must be included (signed by the applicant) and will be executed by the Mayor after final plat approval at the time the City Council accepts the dedication of all the infrastructure into the City. Note the contractor installing the improvements provides the maintenance bond (the developer provides any performance bonds). A stormwater operations and maintenance plan and agreement will also be furnished. Comments: This review assumes a maintenance bond in the amount of $102,511.50 as well as the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement will be submitted after final plat approval by the Planning Commission is attained. The staff report will contain a section listing all follow-up items required by the applicant as well as staff, and those follow-up activities will be memorialized as a condition of approval. Only water and sewer infrastructure is to be dedicated to the City of Fairhope – all other improvements are dedicated to Baldwin County. Engineer’s Response: Executed Maintenance & Guaranty Agreement and Maintenance Bond will be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Enclosed are drafts of the Agreement and Bond. Also enclosed is the revised maintenance bond estimate to include the Installed common area sidewalks. Article VI, Section F. Construction Standards-Water System a. All subdivisions shall have water service. The water service shall be provided by either Fairhope Public Utilities or an approved water service. b. Primary water service may be individual well type systems that have been approved by the Baldwin County Health Department and the Fairhope Public Utilities Water Department. c. All water systems constructed within a subdivision and all water systems constructed outside of a subdivision but servicing a subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with those certain “Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities” d. Water meters shall be placed inside the property line at the start of the utility easement. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒ Follow-up information forthcoming Cross Reference: Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities Final Plat Commentary: Obtain any review comments or punch list items from the Water Department for inclusion in the Planner’s review comments letter. Comments: This item is currently under review by the COF water department. The water main hydrostatic test chart recording printout was furnished and stamped by Trey Jinright. Article VI, Section G. Construction Standards-Fire Hydrants Fire Hydrants shall be installed along each street at a maximum interval of four hundred fifty (450) feet, or at the ends and center of each block, or as otherwise required by the fire authority having jurisdiction. Water supply and pressure shall be adequate to provide fire protection and for the future needs of the development. Blue reflective markers shall be installed at the street line of streets to indicate the location of fire hydrants. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Review Commentary: Obtain from the water department a list of any missing fire hydrant reflectors for inclusion in the review comments. The list must specify the lot number or common area nearest the affected hydrant. Cross-check the preliminary plat for any fire hydrant waivers (sprinkled buildings in lieu of a fire hydrant depending upon the fire classification). Comments: At the time of this writing fire hydrant reflectors have not been installed. Engineer’s Response: Blue fire hydrant reflectors have been Installed by contractor. I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 12 Article VI, Section H. Construction Standards-Sanitary Sewerage 1. All subdivisions shall have sanitary sewer service. The sewer service shall be provided by either the Fairhope Public Utilities or an approved sewer service. 2. All sanitary sewer systems constructed within a subdivision and all sanitary sewer systems constructed outside of a subdivision but servicing a subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with those certain “Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities” which is on file at the City of Fairhope Water & Sewer Department. 3. Individual septic tank type systems that have been approved by the Baldwin County Health Department and the Fairhope Public Utilities Sewer Department may be utilized. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒ Follow-up information forthcoming Cross Reference: Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities requires the following test reports to be submitted: • Division III, Section 1.04 A. Mandrel Testing of PVC gravity sewer lines (All mandrel pulls reflect a “go” condition) • Division III, Section 1.09 B. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Vacuum Testing (All vacuum tests indicated as “OK”) • Division III, Section 1.32 B.1.a.-e. Pneumatic Testing of Gravity Sanitary Sewer Lines (All pneumatic tests indicated as “OK”) • Division III, Section 1.32 B.2. Hydrostatic Testing of Sanitary Sewer Force Mains (N/A, no sewer force main installed on project) • Division III, Section 1.42 Internal Video Inspection of sanitary sewers (submitted to COF Sewer Department for review) • Division III, Section 5.16 L. and 5.17 D. and Division III, Section 5.29 Bacteria Testing submitted (Pace Analytical – absent of E. Coli and Total Coliforms) Final Plat Commentary: Obtain any review comments or punch list items from the Sewer Department for inclusion in the Planner’s review comments letter. Verify with the Water and Sewer Superintendent if a condition of approval is required for the startup of any sewer lift stations. Comments: SSMH-15, located southeast of lot line between lots 5 and 6 must be accessible for a vacuum truck and other vehicles for maintenance purposes. Please include a note on the plat indicating the 7.5’ drainage and utilities easement each side of the internal lot line between lots 5 and 6 must remain clear and shall not contain fences or any other obstructions which restrict vehicle traffic. Further, the note on the plat shall indicate a driveway constructed of adequate material to support an 80,000 lb. GVWR vehicle shall be installed and maintained by the HOA/POA on this drainage and utilities easement. Engineer’s Response: Access Is provided to SSMH 15 via common area 3 between lots 3 & 4. These common areas have blanket drainage and utility easements over their entirety. This is noted on the plat under Note 4. A meeting is scheduled by COF Utility staff for Tuesday, July 21 for additional discussion. Additional Staff Comment – see Condition of Approval #1 which addresses this item. I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 13 Article VI, Section I. Construction Standards-Permanent Monuments Concrete monuments four inches in cross section and three feet long, with a flat top shall be set at all points where the exterior boundaries of the subdivision intersect, including points of curvature and points of tangency on curved boundaries. The top of the monument shall have an "X" indented therein to identify the exact point and the top shall be set flush with grade. All interior lot corners shall be marked with a pipe not smaller than three-quarters inch diameter, 24 inches length and shall be driven flush with finish grade. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Final Plat Commentary: In lieu of placing a concrete monument at each exterior boundary, the developer may place two concrete monuments, preferably near a ROW, within a common area. The two monuments must contain a ferrous core and their locations clearly noted on the final plat. This allowance will have to be indicated in review comments to the engineer of record. Comments: Location of concrete monument set (CMS) is identified on the plat near the main entrance to the site. Article VI, Section K. Construction Standards-Inspection of Improvements When all required improvements have been installed, the sub-divider shall call for a final inspection. The Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent and other City Department representatives shall inspect the site to determine if the required improvements are satisfactorily installed according to plans, specifications, standards and applicable laws and ordinances. To determine if the streets are installed to minimum standards, the sub-divider shall select an independent testing laboratory approved by the City to make the necessary tests. Tests shall be conducted at the expense of the sub-divider as required by Chapter 19 of the Fairhope Code of Ordinances. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the Fairhope Code of Ordinances – Note that the Section 19-2 allows either 6” or 8” compacted sand clay base is allowed by Sec. 19-2(a)(2). The following test reports are required by the Municipal Code: • Subgrade Compaction (if required by Geotechnical Engineer) Sec. 19.2(a)(4) o 100% of Standard Proctor per testing lab, proof rolling prior to placement of curbs was successful per testing laboratory cover letter • Compaction during placement of base material Sec.19.2(a)(4) o 95% of Standard Proctor per testing lab • Compacted base thickness borings Sec. 19.2(a)(4) o 8” thickness reported at testing locations • Asphalt thickness borings (1 ½” required thickness after compaction) Sec. 19.2(a)(5 • Concrete cylinder tests Sec. 19-2.(a)(3). o All cylinder breaks exhibited greater than 3,000 psi at 28 days • Storm drain inspection videos o Inspection videos on CD submitted by Smith Industrial Services (SIS) Final Plat Review Commentary: A cover letter from the testing laboratory, stamped by the lab’s professional engineer (licensed in the State of Alabama) with a statement by the engineer certifying the roadway construction meets the requirements of the project plans must be included. This certificate may be on a report cover or binder cover or may be a standalone letter, but it must cover all the roadway test reports submitted for the project. Obtain from the Public Works Director a punch list of any deficiencies related to road construction for inclusion in the Planner’s review comments. Comments: The testing laboratory’s engineer (Jason Christian, PE, of GeoCon) included a cover letter stating, “Based on the test reports, the roadway construction meets the requirements of the provided project plans”. The cover letter includes the testing engineer’s PE stamp. The roadway and drainage improvements will not be dedicated to the City of Fairhope and this review assumes all roadway construction is acceptable to the Baldwin County Highway Department. I I I I FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST 14 Article VI, Section L. Construction Standards-Requirement to Complete Improvements Sub-divider shall be responsible for providing all required minimum improvements in the subdivision. This may be accomplished either by (1) full installation of such improvements before the Final Plat is submitted to the Planning Commission for approval or (2) after 90% substantial completion of the total cost of the infrastructure the sub- divider may provide to the City a financial guarantee of performance in the form of either a performance bond or a Letter of Credit. Any such performance bond shall be in form and substance acceptable to the Planning Commission, with oblige riders in favor of the City in the event the bond issued in the name of the sub-divider’s contractor and shall be issued by a surety that is licensed to do business in the State of Alabama and having a Best rating of A- or better. In the event that the subdivision lies within the extra-territorial jurisdiction, such guaranty shall be made jointly payable to the City of Fairhope and Baldwin County, Alabama. The surety and the form and amount of such financial guaranty shall be subject to approval of the City and/or County. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☒Follow-up information required Final Plat Review Commentary: See prior sections regarding maintenance and performance bonds. Comments: This review assumes a maintenance bond in the amount of $102,511.50 as well as the Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement will be submitted after final plat approval by the Planning Commission is attained. This review also assumes a letter of credit or performance bond in the amount of $13,537.50 will be submitted in lieu of installation of street trees at the time of final plat. As mentioned previously, sidewalk installation is not addressed in the final plat application and clarification is required for how that will be accomplished. Further, it appears landscaping in common areas is pending – this review assumes all landscaping will be accomplished prior to signatures applied to the final plat. Engineer’s Response: Executed Maintenance & Guaranty Agreement and Maintenance Bond will be provided prior to the recording of the final plat. Enclosed are drafts of the Agreement and Bond. Also enclosed is the revised maintenance bond estimate to include the installed common area sidewalks. The owner respectfully request that a performance bond be accepted for these lot sidewalks. An updated performance bond estimate is enclosed covering these lot sidewalks, street trees, and common area landscaping. These sidewalks will be installed by the individual homebuilder. Additional Staff Comment: See condition of approval #3 which memorializes the follow-up activities for staff and the applicant and specifies the bond procedures timelines. Reviewed by:__________________________ Date of Review:________________________ 7/24/2020 I I COUNTY RD 33RED BARN RD RIO VISTA DRFIELDCREST LN CLYDES LNDAUGHTRY LN HIGHLAND DRCity of FairhopePlanning Commission August 3, 2020 ¯ DAUGHTRY LN RED BARN RD SD 20.35 - Bell Family Subdivision Legend COF Planning Jurisdiction ¯ ¯ ^ Project Name: Bell Family SubdivisionSite Data: 3.8 acresProject Type: 2-Lot Minor SubdivisionJurisdiction: Fairhope's ETJZoning District: UnzonedPPIN Number: 371732General Location: Northeast intersection of CR32 and US HWY 98 (Greeno Road)Surveyor of Record: Engineer of Record: SE CivilOwner / Developer: Red Barn Properties LLCSchool District: J Larry Newton, Fairhope Middle School & Fairhope High SchoolRecommendation: Approved w/ ConditionsPrepared by: Samara Walley 1 SD 20.35 Bell Family Subdivision – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of Red Barn Properties, LLC for plat approval of Bell Family Subdivision, a 2-lot minor division. The property approximately 3.8 acres and is located on the south side of Red Barn Road approximately .3 miles east of County Road 33. Comments: The subject property is in Fairhope’s ETJ and therefore must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision, according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations, is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing flow patterns will be changed by this replat. Water and gas services are available through the City of Fairhope. Electrical services shall be provided by Baldwin EMC. AT&T will provide services as well. The Fire Inspector has stated that the exiting hydrants in the proximity are sufficient. Flow model data has been provided. The nearest fire hydrant is illustrated on the plat. The preliminary plat illustrates a 2-lot subdivision, with Lot 13A and Lot 13B illustrated as a “flag-shaped” lots. Minimum building setback lines are illustrated on the each lot where the lots reach 100’ in width. Drainage and utilities easements are illustrated between each lot. Additionally, the applicant has requested a sidewalk waiver stating that there are no sidewalks in the immediate vicinity. It should be noted that this application is a resubdivision of Lot 13 of the Red Barn Subdivision which was a 16-lot subdivision approved by Planning Commission in 2017. When the Red Barn Subdivision was approved, several notes were added to the plat regarding best management practices, LID techniques, and wetland delineation. All notes as provided on the original subdivision should be reflected on the Final Plat. Waiver Request: Article VI Section D. Sidewalks requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope.” A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in blue) Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following c onditions exist: 1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to other land areas. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Though no hardship is presented, currently there are no sidewalks in the nearby vicinity. 2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Not applicable for this individual case. 3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations because the existing character of the surrounding properties is such that there are no sidewalks. 2 SD 20.35 Bell Family Subdivision – August 3, 2020 4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: The waiver would be minimum deviation from the required standard. 5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowners, or the public; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects. 6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards : “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Not applicable b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Not applicable c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Follow-Up Activities Required by Staff and/or the Applicant: If it is the pleasure of the Planning Commission to approve subject case, the applicant is advised the final plat must be recorded in the Judge of Probate’s office within sixty (60) days of final plat approval by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission, or the final plat approval is null and void. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of SD 20.35 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Provision of all notes on the final plat as provided on the original SD 17.12 Red Barn Subdivision; 2. As a requirement of the previous approval, “ The Owner of each lot shall provide to the City of Fairhope Planning Department a signed and sealed certification from an Alabama registered professional civil engineer and wetland specialist stating that the drainage and LID have met the City of Fairhope drainage and LID requirements.” This should be completed prior to the approval of any building permits; and 3. Approval of the sidewalk waiver. ;:IJ m 0 OJ )> ;:IJ :i;~z ;:IJ ~ m )> ~ 0 SURVEYOR\ENGINEER S.E. CIVIL 880 HOLCOMB BL VD FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 FLOOD STATEMENT PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONE ''x'' UNSHADED AS SCALED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 01003C0664M, COMMUNITY NUMBER 015000, PANEL SUFFIX .,M.', DATED APRIL 19, 30 60 120 60 SCALE I I I I ,1J I I I I I I I I i r I STORM WATER MANAGEMENT: THE OWNER/BUILDER OF EACH LOT WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL TO INSTALL EITHER A BIORETENTION POND OR MULTIPLE RAIN GARDENS AROUND THE DEVELOPED PORTION OF THE LOT RUN-OFF FROM THE IMPERVIOUS AREAS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THESE LID/DETENTION PRACTICES. REFER TO THE DETAILS IN THE RECORDED OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN RECORDED AT INSTRUMENT 1631561, BALDWIN COUNTY PROBATE RECORDS A BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, BALDWIN COUNTY, AND ALABAMA DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AS PER THE 2009 HANDBOOK (ADEM). CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY AT&T THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY AT&T HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN ~g~~TY, ALABAMA, THIS DAY OF ---------~ AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY BALDWIN COUNTY EMC THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY BALDWIN COUNTY EMC, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS DAY OF 2020. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP WE_, THE UNDERSIGNED, .~=~~-=~~-AS PROPRIETOR(S), HAVE CAUSED THE LAND EMBRACED IN THE WITHIN PLAT TO BE SURVEYED, LAID OUT AND PLATTED TO BE KNOWN AS BELL FAMILY SUBDIVISION, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, AND THAT THE STREETS AND EASEMENTS, AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC DATED THIS ___ DAY OF _______ 2020 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF NOTARY PUBLIC: STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDW1N _______ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY, IN SAID STATE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT =~~~------AS OWNER OF THE LANDS PLATTED HEREON IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND WHO IS KNOWN TO ME, ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY THAT, BEING INFORMED OF THE CONTENT OF THE INSTRUMENT, AND AS SUCH LEASEHOLD OWNER AND 'vVITH FULL AUTHORITY, EXECUTED THE SAME VOLUNTARILY. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY OF NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES WETLAND BUFFERS: 'NETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND ALLOWED USES WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE SHALL BE AS PER ARTICLE V, SECTION F, OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS: ,s highest grade next to the proposed Residence. of \he LOT13B 3.40 AC I _____ 338.69~9-~ (..iOORE) I -N00"14"06"[l 1678.46,-----1 N 00" 02'10" El 1678.60' I I CERTIFICATE OF THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR THE UNDERSIGNED, AS DIRECTOR OF THE BALDWIN PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. HEREBY APPROVES THE PLAT FOR RECORDING OF THE SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA THIS DAY OF _______ 2020. PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER THE UNDERSIGNED, AS COUNTY ENGINEER OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDW1N COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE DAY OF ________ 2020 COUNTY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION THIS PLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA, AND IS APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION BY· ____________ ,DATE· ______ _ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY E-911 ADDRESSING THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY BALDWIN COUNTY E-911 BOARD. HEREBY APPROVES THE ROAD NAMES AS DEPICTED ON THE WITHIN PLAT AND HEREBY APPROVES THE \NITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATED OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS DAY OF ______ ~ 2020. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY CITY OF FAIRHOPE UTILITIES (WATER): THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE UTILITIES HEREBY APPROVES THE WlTHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALD\NIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS ____ DAY OF --------2020 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 6 7. BALDWIN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL THE LOTS ON THIS PLAT MEET THE ALLOWED EXEMPTIONS TO THE LARGE-FLOW DEVELOPMENT AS PROVIDED IN 420-3-1.16(e) OF THE ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL REGULATION FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA THE DIVISION OF LAND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LARGE FLOW DEVELOPMENT AS PER THE STATE OF ALABAMA HEALTH DEPARTMENT RULES GOVERNING SAME. THE SIGNATURE AFFIXED HEREON DOES NOT IMPLY AN APPROVAL FOR ANY EXISTING OR FUTURE ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS THE HEREIN PLAT IS APPROVED FOR RECORDING ONLY THIS _____ DAY OF---------~ 2020 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL PARTS OF THIS SURVEY AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION, AND BELIEF. LOT 13, RED BARN ROAD ESTATES ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED ON SLIDE 2596-A, PROBATE RECORDS BALDWIN ~•••t'~''.:(1111t~ CO~UNTY, ALABAM/1 Ii~\ _ -~ 0&-?..'3-Z.,020 l*/~AL \*l DA AL. P.L.S. NO. 26014 DATE i ~ LAND / I '\_~ -~Rv£'(~~..i suRvEY NOT VALID wITHouT ORIGINAL sIGNATURE AND sEA~,/"ifr··· ,/i.'$' • ~1n1111i1ill\\\\\\~~· 7 I I I I I ~I::: I ~I~ 1d I ~I I ~I I I I ,I I ~I ii 7 ;1 I ~I I §I I I I VICINITY MAP 1"= 1 MILE B.S.L {A & R) (R) • CRF LEGEND: OWNER/DEVELOPER: RED BARN PROPERTIES LLC 164 ST FRANCIS ST, STE 205 MOBILE AL 36602 PARCEL NO. 05-47-09-30-0-000-032.009 PPIN 371732 SITE DATA: ZONING: UNZONED TOTAL ACREAGE: 6.80 AC NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 UTILITIES WATER SERVICE: FAIRHOPE UTILITIES SEWER SERVICE: INDIV. SEPTIC SYSTEMS ELECTRIC SERVICE: BALDWIN COUNTY EMC TELEPHONE SERVICE: AT&T BELL FAMILY SUBDIVISION A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 RED BARN ROAD ESTATES (SLIDE FILE 2596-A) ~I.Civil DRAWN BOUNDARY & CHKD. SUBDIVISION PROJMGR ,Engineering SCALE & Surveying PROJECT MIKE BELL 880 HOLCOMB BLVD FA1Wt~::O-<i~l6532 FILE SHEET DE□ DE□ DE□ 1"=60' RED BARN REDBARN 1 OF 1 July 16, 2020 Samara Walley City of Fairhope Planning & Zoning PO Box 429 Fairhope, AL 36533 251-928-8003 RE: Bell Family Subdivision Waiver Request Dear Samara: Please accept this letter as a request for a Waiver from the Fairhope Subdivision Regulations in regards to sidewalk requirements on the above referenced development. Red Barn Road is a rural County Road and no sidewalks have been required to date on the other lots in this subdivision. We only have 117 feet of the total one-half mile of Lots fronting this road. We appreciate your consideration in helping us make this development a success. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David E Diehl, PLS Partner Fire Inspection Report Score Inspection Type Address Project Name Conducted on Prepared By Contractor/ Owner Name Private & Conf1dent1ai I 0% Failed items n/ Incomplete 0 Actions 0 20.35 I Bell Family Subdivision Bell Family Subdivision 8th Jul, 2020 9:49 AM CDT Samara Walley 7/3 Audit Photo 7 Hydrants will be needed at entrance to each 3+ Acre see above Further hydrants maybe needed based on development of property, That decision will be made with the site plan development phase when ever that may occur, Fairhope Fire Inspector Owner/Contractor/Business Owner Inspection Outcome Private & Conf:dent1al 0% 2/3 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 1 Date of review: July 6, 2020 Project: SD 20.35 Bell Family Subdivision The following review checklist is derived from various components of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and/or staff recommendations. Additional comments may be depicted on “marked-up” plans. Level of acceptance is indicated with an “x” in the checkboxes below. All comments are indicated in bold italic text. Missing or outstanding items, or items requiring revision and resubmission are further described in the comments section of each item bold text. Preliminary Plat Submission Requirements Article IV, Section C.1. Two (2) copies of the preliminary plat and two copies of all plans shall be submitted initially for staff review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Following staff review and comments, formal submission of the preliminary plat shall include eighteen (18) copies of the preliminary plat and one (1) copy of all plans. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up submittal requested Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(20) Digital copy of all plans in Adobe PDF format Comments: Staff requests the 18 copies of the preliminary plat and 1 copy of all plans be on 11x17 paper. Article IV, Section C.1. Preliminary Plat Application Checklist ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Application for Subdivision Plat Approval ☒N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Certificate of County Zoning (IF APPLICABLE) ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Memorandum of Transmittal for Extra-Territorial Development (IF APPLICABLE) ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Memorandum of Transmittal required Article IV, Section C.1. Certification of Property Owner Notification List ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 2 Article IV, Section C.1.b.(1) Vicinity map at a scale not less than 1: 9600 ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments Article IV, Section C.1.b.(2) Name and location of the proposed subdivision and names and location of any adjacent subdivisions. The name of the proposed subdivision shall not duplicate or closely approximate the name of any other subdivision covered by these regulations. The Commission shall have the final authority to designate the name of the subdivision. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(3) Names and addresses of the following: • owner • designer • applicant • all associated investors • record owners of lands immediately adjacent to subdivision. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(4) North point, linear and graphic scales, and date. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(5) Contour map at two-foot interval. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Did not receive contour map at two-foot intervals Article IV, Section C.1.b.(6) Blocks and lots with dimensions and bearings for all lot lines and boundaries. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(7) Building set back lines shall be shown on the plat as required by the zoning ordinance or in absence of zoning, as required by deed restrictions. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(8) Plan and profiles of all proposed utilities with connections (8) Plan and profiles of all proposed utility with connections to existing utility system and all proposed improvements. Approval of private utility connections for water and sewer shall be subject to the standards of Article VIII, Sections E. and G., respectively of the Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fairhope. The applicant shall submit one copy of utility letters stating I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 3 Article IV, Section C.1.b.(8) (continued) availability of service. Utility letters and layout must be submitted from electric, water, sewer, phone, trash provider, and gas (if applicable), stating the property may be adequately served by such utility. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(9) Location/dimensions of lands to be dedicated or reserved for parks, open space or other public use ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(10) The existing or proposed zoning classification of the subdivision and all contiguous lands. Where there is no zoning in effect, the proposed use of the lots shall be shown on the plat. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(11) Flow model data submitted to the standards of the COF Water Department. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Follow-up information pending Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(12) Street lighting plan ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up information pending Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(13) and Article V, Section D.5.a.(9) Tree protection plan for all required street trees or trees over 24” DBH. Tree protection fences shall be installed prior to land disturbance activities. (See Appendix G) ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Ordinance number 1444, Tree Ordinance Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(14) Minimum finished floor elevations for every lot. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(15) Submit a topographic survey with an aerial photograph with plat overlay. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(16) Pedestrian circulation plan ☐N/A ☐Accepted w/ conditions ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 4 Comments: No sidewalks or sidewalk easement shown. Need to provide sidewalks or a sidewalk waiver Article IV, Section C.1.b.(17) Site data box including but not limited to: • Total acreage of site • Acreage of common area(s) • Total number of lots • Square footage of each lot • Site Density • Number of units proposed ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(18) Applicants shall provide site data and all applicable permits relative to items such as soils, wetlands, flooding, drainage, natural features and potential archeological features. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Notes listed on initial subdivision approval to be placed on plat Article IV, Section C.1.b.(19) Maximum drawing size and scale shall be limited to 24"x 36” and 1:100, respectively ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: See Article IV, Section C.1. for staff request regarding eighteen (18) copies of drawings in 11x17 format following initial staff review. Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(20) Digital copy of all plans in Adobe PDF format ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.c. Street Plan Requirements: (1) Location of existing and proposed streets within and adjacent to subdivision (2) Widths and purpose of existing and proposed rights-of-way (ROW) and easements (3) Clear identification of ROW and location of any street included in Master Plan (4) Proposed curb radii for each street intersection or significant street curves (5) Proposed street names Article IV, Section C.1.c. (continued) (6) Typical section for proposed streets, centerline profiles of all proposed streets with finish grades, at a scale of: 1"=50' horizontal and 1"=5' vertical, or 1"=100' horizontal and 1"=10' vertical ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.d. Drainage plan prepared by professional engineer, including proposed method of storm water detention and means of controlling erosion during construction. Any portion of the land in the proposed subdivision subject to periodic inundation by storm drainage, overflow or ponding shall be clearly identified on the plat. Lands lying within the flood plain, V or A Zones, shall be clearly identified on the plat. Storm-water detention facilities shall be shown in the plans and calculations provided. I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 5 ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.e. Engineering Plans: all engineering plans shall be signed and stamped by the registered professional engineer of record. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.f. Phased development: where a phased development is proposed, the preliminary plat shall include all phase lines and a master plan showing the continuity of development proposed for the entire project. Each phase shall satisfy the requirements of these regulations individually. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.g. State or County ROW detailed highway improvements plan: If any state right-of-way or any improvement thereon is proposed to be changed or modified, a detailed Highway Improvements Plan, with the written approval of the responsible official of the Alabama Highway Department, showing all existing features within the rights-of-way and all proposed changes, including, but not limited to, changes in traffic patterns, markings, signs, curbs and barriers, neutral zones, signals, warnings, plantings and landscaping. There shall be submitted with and as a part of the Plan a written statement setting forth means proposed for traffic control and safety during construction and for restoration of the site. All of the foregoing shall also apply to rights-of-way controlled by the County, except that the County Engineer's approval shall appear on the Plat to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.h. Traffic Data and Traffic Study: Applications shall include trip generation data showing the projected average daily traffic (ADT) in a 24-hour period and projected peak-hour traffic generated by the development in the subdivision application. Peak hour traffic shall generally be the hours between 7 A.M. and 9 A.M. for morning and 4 P.M. and 6 P.M. for the evening and include the consecutive 60-minute segment in which traffic counts are projected to occur. In instances where the proposed application will have peak periods that differ from the general peak periods above, the Planning Commission may require that the analysis be conducted for the alternative peak periods. Trip generation data shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineer’s Trip Generation Manual or actual data about similar developments in Alabama with the same types of uses and site conditions. A traffic study shall be required for all applications that will generate an average daily traffic (ADT) count of 1,000 trips or more, or which will generate 50 trips or more during any peak hour period. An agent selected by the City and paid for by the applicant shall perform the traffic study. The traffic study shall be used to determine what on-site and off-site street or traffic improvements may be necessary due to the development. The Planning Commission may condition the approval of the application on the applicant paying for or constructing those improvements or portions of improvements that are needed due to the traffic impact of the application based on all potential land uses. The traffic study shall include the following data I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 6 along with an analysis of the data: (1) Estimates of trip generation for the proposed development showing projected inbound and outbound vehicle trips for morning and evening peak periods to identify the maximum combined hourly traffic volume associated with the peaking characteristics of the site development combined with the adjacent street traffic. (2) Projected traffic impact and trip distribution on existing and planned streets within the development and at major signalized and unsignalized intersections within ½ mile of the project site (study area) areas likely to be impacted by the development. Intersections of particular concern to the City may be added or omitted from the traffic study at the direction of the Planning Director; (3) Assignment of trips generated by the proposed development on existing and planned streets within the development and areas likely to be impacted by the development and within the project study area; (4) Intersection turning movements and traffic counts on all existing and planned intersections likely to be impacted by the proposed development. Traffic counts must be less than 3 years old to be used as base volumes for the traffic analysis; (5) Corresponding intersection levels of services shall be calculated for the peak periods for the intersections within the study area, utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) latest version, or Synchro traffic software, for the existing conditions and opening year of the project site. Intersections shall be considered deficient if Level of Service (LOS) D is exceeded, and improvements to meet this LOS threshold shall be identified; (6) Site access volumes and major unsignalized intersections within the study area shall be evaluated using the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) to demonstrate the need for installation of a traffic control signal, (7) Auxiliary turn lane requirements shall be evaluated at the site access points to identify if right turn and left turn ingress lanes are needed. Site access points that generate 40 or more right turns in one hour will be required to construct a right turn ingress lane. The need for constructing a left turn ingress lane shall be considered based on the Appendix criteria for left turn lane warrants; (8) Potential mitigating measures or trip reduction options. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.i. List of Names and addresses of all persons to whom notice of a public hearing shall be sent, and the names and addresses of all owners of land immediately adjoining the proposed subdivision as their names appear upon the plats in the county tax assessor’s office, which will be certified or otherwise verified by the County, on the tax records of the County. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1. Certification of Property Owner Notification List Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.j. The applicant shall post on any specific property, which is the subject of the application, on a sign facing each adjacent public street. The sign shall be furnished by the City at the time of application giving notice of the hearing. The sign shall be posted no later than 15 days prior to the hearing before the Planning Commission. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the sign in accordance with these regulations. Failure to post this sign may result in nullification of the subdivision application and approval. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 7 Article IV, Section C.1.k. County Engineer Correspondence In the case of applications for a preliminary plat outside the City limits but within the jurisdiction of these regulations, the applicant shall be required to submit evidence in writing that plans for the subdivision shall have been received by the County Engineer for his/her review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V, Section A. When lands proposed to be subdivided lie outside the corporate limits of the City, the minimum design standards of Baldwin County shall apply when such standards are more restrictive than those of the City. All approvals of the Commission shall be subject to the more restrictive requirements of Baldwin County and the approval of the County Engineer shall be a condition precedent to approval for construction of improvements. Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.l. Payment of filing fee as specified in the City’s most recent schedule of fees. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.2. Staff Review 2. Staff review – Applicants for a preliminary plat shall first submit the preliminary plat and plans to the Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent for staff’s review. The Director shall determine if the submittals meet all of the requirements of Section C.1., above. Incomplete, partial, or inaccurate submittals will not be accepted, but will be returned to applicant for re-submission for a later hearing. Staff shall review the application and provide comments to the applicant. Following staff review and comments the applicant shall submit revised drawings for review by staff and the Planning Commission. The revised plans submitted shall reflect staff’s initial review comments. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: For the applicant’s information. Article IV, Section C.5. Pre-Construction Conference 5. Pre-construction Conference – An onsite pre-construction conference with City representatives is required prior to initiation of any land disturbance activities. Construction of said improvements shall in no way obligate the Commission to grant Final Approval of the Plat, nor shall it obligate the City Council to accept such improvements for public maintenance. No owner or developer shall proceed with any site work under authority of preliminary plat approval until the completion of the preconstruction conference. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: for the Applicant’s information. Article IV, Section C.6. a. and b. Expiration and Revocation 6. Expiration and Revocation - a. Any substantial deviation from the approved submittals during construction or failure to provide for traffic control, safety, environmental protection controls and/or best management practices and restoration of the site shall be grounds for the immediate suspension of the Preliminary Plat Approval and/or issuance of a stop work order. The Planning Commission shall have the power to reinstate Preliminary Approval when it is satisfied that conditions resulting in suspension have been mitigated. b. If a final plat is not submitted within two years or less after preliminary approval has been given, the preliminary approval shall expire and the preliminary plat shall be null, void and of no force or effect. I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 8 ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: for the Applicant’s information. Article V, Section E.2. Lot Standards – Lot Sizes a. Land Subject to Zoning - Where land is subject to zoning all lots shall fully conform to the requirements of the applicable zoning ordinance. The applicant shall furnish to the commission site drawings to demonstrate compliance. Lots not in compliance shall not have building permits issued unless combined with other lots and reconfigured so as to comply with zoning requirements. b. Land not Subject to Zoning - 1) Lots not subject to zoning shall have lot areas of not less than 15,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet; 2) Where neither public water nor public sewage is available, lot areas and widths shall conform to the requirements of the public health authorities, but in no case shall be less than 100 feet in width and 20,000 square feet in area. c. Insofar as is practicable; side lot lines shall be at right angles or shall be radial to street lines. d. Corner lots for residential use shall be designed with additional frontage, greater than is required for interior lot widths. The additional frontage shall be equal to the difference of the minimum front setback and minimum side setback requirements for any applicable zoning district, for the purpose of allowing building orientation and setback from both front and side streets. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article V, Section E.3.a. Lot Standards – Lot Access a. Except as provided in Section D.6., all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly maintained street. Double frontage lots are prohibited, except where lots consist of more than 66% of a block. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article VI, Section H. Construction Standards-Sanitary Sewerage 1. All subdivisions shall have sanitary sewer service. The sewer service shall be provided by either the Fairhope Public Utilities or an approved sewer service. 2. All sanitary sewer systems constructed within a subdivision and all sanitary sewer systems constructed outside of a subdivision but servicing a subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with those certain “Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities” which is on file at the City of Fairhope Water & Sewer Department. 3. Individual septic tank type systems that have been approved by the Baldwin County Health Department and the Fairhope Public Utilities Sewer Department may be utilized. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities Comments: Construction Standards Article VI, Section A. Construction Standards-General The sub-divider shall be required to install, or construct improvements hereinafter described prior to having released bond or other surety which guarantees the installation of such improvements. All improvements required shall be constructed in conformity with these regulations and in conformity with Chapter 19, Streets, Sidewalks, and Other Public Ways, of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Fairhope, as amended. All I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 9 improvements shall be designed and sealed by a Project Engineer. The Project Engineer shall carry Errors and Omissions Insurance at a minimum coverage of at least $1,000,000. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering practice. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended. Comments: Sidewalk should be depicted or a sidewalk waiver shall be required. Article VI, Section G. Construction Standards-Fire Hydrants Fire Hydrants shall be installed along each street at a maximum interval of four hundred fifty (450) feet, or at the ends and center of each block, or as otherwise required by the fire authority having jurisdiction. Water supply and pressure shall be adequate to provide fire protection and for the future needs of the development. Blue reflective markers shall be installed at the street line of streets to indicate the location of fire hydrants. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: The plat does not depict a fire hydrant. Awaiting Fire Inspection comments. Article VI, Section I. Construction Standards-Permanent Monuments Concrete monuments four inches in cross section and three feet long, with a flat top shall be set at all points where the exterior boundaries of the subdivision intersect, including points of curvature and points of tangency on curved boundaries. The top of the monument shall have an "X" indented therein to identify the exact point and the top shall be set flush with grade. All interior lot corners shall be marked with a pipe not smaller than three-quarters inch diameter, 24 inches length and shall be driven flush with finish grade. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up correspondence required Comments: Reviewed by: Samara Walley Date of Review: ________________________ I I I I I I I I 50%0 0 Fire Inspection Report Red Barn Road (SD 20.35) / Red Barn (Bell Subdivision)Complete Score Failed items Actions Inspection Type Inspection for planning department Address Red Barn Road (SD 20.35) Project Name Red Barn (Bell Subdivision) Conducted on 10th Jul, 2020 12:17 PM CDT Prepared By S. Garber Contractor/ Owner Name Mike Bell Private & Confidential 1/4 Audit 50% Photo 1 Photo 2 Photo 3 Photo 4 Photo 5 Photo 6 Photo 7 Photo 8 After physical visiting the Red Barn Property (see above photos) I am going to render my recommendation for the planning board: 1) the photos illustrate access to two fire hydrants 2) the photos also illustrate the two separate entrances to each 3+ acres property 3) I am aware that the subdivision guidelines call for hydrant to be within 400/450ft 4)the access roads to each property have very accessible emergency access(proper width) I feel comfortable with the set up available to the property at this time. Infrastructure is more than adequate for two residential houses.The dynamics of how this lot has been structured does not make the situation any less safe. Fairhope Fire Inspector Sandy Garber 13th Jul, 2020 6:31 AM CDT Owner/Contractor/Business Owner Inspection Outcome No Action/ General Comments 0% Private & Confidential 2/4 Appendix Photo 1 Photo 3 Photo 5 Photo 2 Photo 4 Photo 6 Private & Confidential 3/4 Photo 7 Photo 8 Private & Confidential 4/4 .. U30ft • .. 402ft • July 1, 2020 S.E. Civil Engineering and Surveying Stephanie Diehl 880 Holcomb Blvd. Suite 2F Fairhope, AL 36532 Re: Bell Family Subdivision (2 Lot Subdivide) Dear Lindsey Mooney: This letter is to confirm that the referenced development is in Baldwin E.M.C.’s service territory. Baldwin EMC is willing to service the development as long as the necessary easements are granted using our standard easement form and all other appropriate documents and fees are finalized in advance. Baldwin EMC must be given proper notice and planning time with respect to required system upgrades (transmission line, substation and distribution line). All system upgrades and line extensions will be in accordance with Baldwin EMC’s current Line Extension Policy. Please contact me to discuss necessary easements and fees. Below is our typical required easements for subdivisions: There is a dedicated herewith a 10 foot utility easement on all lot lines and common areas adjacent to the right-of-ways and a 10 foot utility easement on each side of lot and common area lines, unless otherwise noted. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 251-989-0151. Sincerely, Brian Seals Manager of Engineering BALDWIN EMC Ynu r "fouchscone En ergy" Coopemtive P.O. Box 220 Summerdale, AL 36580-0220 (251) 989-6247 www.baldwinemc.com Karin Wilson AJqyor (ouncil Members Ke\·in G. Boone Robert .'\. Brown Jack Burrell, ,.\CMO Jimmy Conyers Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, ,\\\IC Ci(r c7crk Ki mbc'r!), Creech Ci()' J/·casurcr Jc, 1 \onh Section Street P.O. Drawer 429 Fairhope, Alabama 36532 251-928-2136 251-928-6776 fax \\'\nr.fairlwpcal.go\· July 16, 2020 S.E. Civil Engineering Attn: Stephanie Diehl 880 Holcomb Blvd, Ste 2F Fairhope, AL 36532 Dear Ms. Diehl, Regarding your availability request for Resub of lot 13 of Red Barn Estates. Water: Is available through Fairhope utilities. Sewer: Is not available through Fairhope utilities. Electric: Is not available through Fairhope utilities. Gas: Is available. Gas services will generally be installed at no cost to the owner. We do, however, reserve the right to charge for services that will only connect non-essential gas loads, such as fire logs and/or barbeque grills. Sincerely, Mike Allison Operations Director City of Fairhope, AL Mike.Allison@fairhopeal.gov cc Jay Whitman, Superintendent, Water and Waste Water Department cc Jeremy Morgan, Superintendent, Electric Department cc: Terry Holman, Superintendent, Gas Department ATO 2155 OLD SHELL RD Suite MOBILE, AL 36607 T: 2514718361 F: 2514710410 www.att.com ATO 2155 OLD SHELL RD Suite MOBILE, AL 36607 T: 2514718361 F: 2514710410 www.att.com July 15, 2020 David Diehl S. E. Civil Engineering 880 Holcomb Blvd. Fairhope, Alabama 36532 RE: Bell Family Subdivision Dear Mr. Diehl: This letter is in response to your request for information on the availability of service at the above referenced subdivision by AT&T. This letter acknowledges that the above referenced subdivision is located in an area served by AT&T. Any service arrangements for the proposed subdivision will be subject to later discussions and agreements between the developer and AT&T. Please be advised that this letter is not a commitment by AT&T to provide service to the Bell Family Subdivision. Please contact me at the phone number included in this letter with any questions. Thank you for contacting AT&T. Sincerely, Wade Mitchell MGR OSP Planning & Engineering Design MAIN STDOVECOTEL NA L S W A Y TAYLOR ST T OPE L N2ND ST W I N D M E R E PLK EARLEY L N F OR E S T P A R KD R CHAPMAN S T City of FairhopePlanning Commission August 3, 2020 ¯MAIN ST CHAPMAN S TKEARLEYLN SD 20.36 - Shiawasena Subdivision Legend COF Corp. Limits COF Planning Jurisdiction COF Zoning PUD - Planned Unit Development R-1 - Low Density Single-Family ¯ ¯ ^ MOBILE BAY Project Name: Shiawasena SubdivisionSite Data: 3 acresProject Type: 2-Lot Minor SubdivisionJurisdiction: Fairhope Planning JurisdictionZoning District: R-1PPIN Number: 11586General Location: West side of Main Street Chapman Street and Taylor StreetSurveyor of Record: Engineer of Record: Smith, Clark & AssociatesOwner / Developer: Jason TickleSchool District: Fairhope Elementary School Fairhope Middle and High Schools Recommendation: Approved w/ ConditionsPrepared by: Samara Walley 1 SD 20.36 Shiawasena Subdivision – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of Jason Tickle for plat approval of Shiawasena Subdivision, a 2-lot minor division. The property is approximately 3 acres and is located on the west side of Main Street between Chapman Street and Taylor Street. Comments: The subject property is in the Corporate limits of the City of Fairhope and therefore must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing flow patterns will be changed by this replat. Water, sewer, and gas services are available through the City of Fairhope. Electrical services shall be provided by Riviera Utilities. AT&T will provide services as well. The Fire Inspector has stated that the exiting hydrant in the proximity is sufficient. Flow model data has been submitted by the applicant. The fire hydrant is not illustrated on the plat and would therefore be a condition of approval. The preliminary plat illustrates a 2-lot subdivision, with Lot 1 illustrated as a “flag-shaped” lot. It should be noted that the lot width requirement for an R-1 zoned property is 100-feet. Therefore, the building setback for Lot 1 should be revised to reflect a 40-foot building setback where the lot reaches 100-feet in width. Additionally, the applicant has requested a sidewalk waiver stating that there are existing sidewalks are on Main Street across from the subject property. Waiver Request: Article VI Section D. Sidewalks requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope.” A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in blue) Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following conditions exist: 1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to other land areas. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Though no hardship is presented, currently there are no sidewalks on the same side of the street as the subject property. There are existing sidewalks across the street. 2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Not applicable for this individual case. 3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations because the existing character of the surrounding properties is such that there are no sidewalks on the same side of street as the subject property. 4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: The waiver would be minimum deviation from the required standard. 2 SD 20.36 Shiawasena Subdivision – August 3, 2020 5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowners, or the public; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects. 6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards : “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Not applicable b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Not applicable c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Follow-Up Activities Required by Staff and/or the Applicant: If it is the pleasure of the Planning Commission to approve subject case, the applicant is advised the final plat must be recorded in the Judge of Probate’s office within sixty (60) days of final plat approval by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission, or the final plat approval is null and void. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of SD 20.36 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Illustrate existing hydrant on the plat; 2. Revision of the setback line for Lot 1 to reflect a 40 -foot building setback where the lot reaches 100- feet in width; and 3. Approval of the sidewalk waiver. July 17, 2020 Ms. Samara Walley City of Fairhope PO Drawer 429 Fairhope, AL 36533 RE: SD 20.36 Shiawasena Subdivision Dear Ms. Samara, Thank you for your thorough review of our application regarding the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. The purpose of this letter is to request that a waiver be considered for the installation of a sidewalk. There is an existing sidewalk across Main St. from this property. We have updated the plat to reflect staff comments. Should you have any questions or concerns please let me know. Sincerely, Hunter C. Smith, P.L.S. P.O. BOX 7082 • Spanish Fort, AL 36577 • (251) 626-0404 hunter@smithclarkllc.com VIA E-MAIL ATTACHMENT outside the platted lands. Easement placement and widths shall be approved by the Planning Commission. No half easements will be approved unless adjacent property owners dedicate the other half of the easement at time of approval. Additional comments: • Illustrate required building setbacks. The virtual DRC meeting is Thursday July 9, 2020 at 9:30AM. You should have a received an email notifying you about how to access the meeting. Please contact me if you have not received this information with the link to join the meeting. The application is scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on Monday, August 3, 2020. A response to this letter addressing all outstanding items is required no later than 9:00 AM on Monday, July 20, 2020. If the deadline passes with no response, the application will be withheld from the agenda due to an incomplete application. Please provide eighteen (18) copies of the revised plans in 11 x 1 7 format as well as Adobe pdf format on a compact disc as more fully described in the checklist summary above Please feel free to contact me at (251) 928-8003 with questions. Respectfully, ~offlev;(/ Samara Walley, MCP (J City Planner '"'- City of Fairhope Fire Inspection Report Score Inspection Type Address Project Name Conducted on Prepared By Contractor/ Owner Name Private & Confidential on/ 50% Failed items Complete 0 Actions 0 Shiawasena Subdivision SD 30.26 Shiawasena Subdivision 6th Jul, 2020 2:24 PM CDT Samara Walley 1 /3 Audit Photo 1 Photo 2 ~,' ~n:;; -:= ' -- = ~ ~ E --' --' '" Photo 3 located to the north and south of property on main street Recommend hydrant on access road From a tactical firefighting stand point A hose lay off main street will any other emergency vehicles to make entry down the access road. Road will be blocked by (HD H) high diameter hose Fairhope Fire Inspector Sandy Garber 7th 2020 6 04 AM CDT Owner/Contractor/Business Owner Inspection Outcome Private & Cont idential 50% 2/3 Appendix Photo 1 Photo 2 Photo 3 Private & Confidential 3/3 PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 1 Date of review: July 6, 2020 Project: SD 20.35 Shiwasena Subdivision The following review checklist is derived from various components of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and/or staff recommendations. Additional comments may be depicted on “marked-up” plans. Level of acceptance is indicated with an “x” in the checkboxes below. All comments are indicated in bold italic text. Missing or outstanding items, or items requiring revision and resubmission are further described in the comments section of each item bold text. Preliminary Plat Submission Requirements Article IV, Section C.1. Two (2) copies of the preliminary plat and two copies of all plans shall be submitted initially for staff review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Following staff review and comments, formal submission of the preliminary plat shall include eighteen (18) copies of the preliminary plat and one (1) copy of all plans. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up submittal requested Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(20) Digital copy of all plans in Adobe PDF format Comments: Staff requests the 18 copies of the preliminary plat and 1 copy of all plans be on 11x17 paper. Article IV, Section C.1. Preliminary Plat Application Checklist ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Please provide Article IV, Section C.1. Application for Subdivision Plat Approval ☒N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Certificate of County Zoning (IF APPLICABLE) ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Memorandum of Transmittal for Extra-Territorial Development (IF APPLICABLE) ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Certification of Property Owner Notification List ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 2 Article IV, Section C.1.b.(1) Vicinity map at a scale not less than 1: 9600 ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments Article IV, Section C.1.b.(2) Name and location of the proposed subdivision and names and location of any adjacent subdivisions. The name of the proposed subdivision shall not duplicate or closely approximate the name of any other subdivision covered by these regulations. The Commission shall have the final authority to designate the name of the subdivision. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(3) Names and addresses of the following: • owner • designer • applicant • all associated investors • record owners of lands immediately adjacent to subdivision. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(4) North point, linear and graphic scales, and date. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(5) Contour map at two-foot interval. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Did not receive contour map at two-foot intervals Article IV, Section C.1.b.(6) Blocks and lots with dimensions and bearings for all lot lines and boundaries. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(7) Building set back lines shall be shown on the plat as required by the zoning ordinance or in absence of zoning, as required by deed restrictions. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(8) Plan and profiles of all proposed utilities with connections (8) Plan and profiles of all proposed utility with connections to existing utility system and all proposed improvements. Approval of private utility connections for water and sewer shall be subject to the standards of Article VIII, Sections E. and G., respectively of the Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fairhope. The applicant shall submit one copy of utility letters stating I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 3 Article IV, Section C.1.b.(8) (continued) availability of service. Utility letters and layout must be submitted from electric, water, sewer, phone, trash provider, and gas (if applicable), stating the property may be adequately served by such utility. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(9) Location/dimensions of lands to be dedicated or reserved for parks, open space or other public use ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(10) The existing or proposed zoning classification of the subdivision and all contiguous lands. Where there is no zoning in effect, the proposed use of the lots shall be shown on the plat. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(11) Flow model data submitted to the standards of the COF Water Department. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Follow-up information pending Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(12) Street lighting plan ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up information pending Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(13) and Article V, Section D.5.a.(9) Tree protection plan for all required street trees or trees over 24” DBH. Tree protection fences shall be installed prior to land disturbance activities. (See Appendix G) ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Ordinance number 1444, Tree Ordinance Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(14) Minimum finished floor elevations for every lot. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(15) Submit a topographic survey with an aerial photograph with plat overlay. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(16) Pedestrian circulation plan ☐N/A ☐Accepted w/ conditions ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 4 Comments: No sidewalks or sidewalk easement shown. Need to provide sidewalks or a sidewalk waiver Article IV, Section C.1.b.(17) Site data box including but not limited to: • Total acreage of site • Acreage of common area(s) • Total number of lots • Square footage of each lot • Site Density • Number of units proposed ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(18) Applicants shall provide site data and all applicable permits relative to items such as soils, wetlands, flooding, drainage, natural features and potential archeological features. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Notes listed on initial subdivision approval to be placed on plat Article IV, Section C.1.b.(19) Maximum drawing size and scale shall be limited to 24"x 36” and 1:100, respectively ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: See Article IV, Section C.1. for staff request regarding eighteen (18) copies of drawings in 11x17 format following initial staff review. Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(20) Digital copy of all plans in Adobe PDF format ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.c. Street Plan Requirements: (1) Location of existing and proposed streets within and adjacent to subdivision (2) Widths and purpose of existing and proposed rights-of-way (ROW) and easements (3) Clear identification of ROW and location of any street included in Master Plan (4) Proposed curb radii for each street intersection or significant street curves (5) Proposed street names Article IV, Section C.1.c. (continued) (6) Typical section for proposed streets, centerline profiles of all proposed streets with finish grades, at a scale of: 1"=50' horizontal and 1"=5' vertical, or 1"=100' horizontal and 1"=10' vertical ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.d. Drainage plan prepared by professional engineer, including proposed method of storm water detention and means of controlling erosion during construction. Any portion of the land in the proposed subdivision subject to periodic inundation by storm drainage, overflow or ponding shall be clearly identified on the plat. Lands lying within the flood plain, V or A Zones, shall be clearly identified on the plat. Storm-water detention facilities shall be shown in the plans and calculations provided. I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 5 ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.e. Engineering Plans: all engineering plans shall be signed and stamped by the registered professional engineer of record. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.f. Phased development: where a phased development is proposed, the preliminary plat shall include all phase lines and a master plan showing the continuity of development proposed for the entire project. Each phase shall satisfy the requirements of these regulations individually. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.g. State or County ROW detailed highway improvements plan: If any state right-of-way or any improvement thereon is proposed to be changed or modified, a detailed Highway Improvements Plan, with the written approval of the responsible official of the Alabama Highway Department, showing all existing features within the rights-of-way and all proposed changes, including, but not limited to, changes in traffic patterns, markings, signs, curbs and barriers, neutral zones, signals, warnings, plantings and landscaping. There shall be submitted with and as a part of the Plan a written statement setting forth means proposed for traffic control and safety during construction and for restoration of the site. All of the foregoing shall also apply to rights-of-way controlled by the County, except that the County Engineer's approval shall appear on the Plat to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.h. Traffic Data and Traffic Study: Applications shall include trip generation data showing the projected average daily traffic (ADT) in a 24-hour period and projected peak-hour traffic generated by the development in the subdivision application. Peak hour traffic shall generally be the hours between 7 A.M. and 9 A.M. for morning and 4 P.M. and 6 P.M. for the evening and include the consecutive 60-minute segment in which traffic counts are projected to occur. In instances where the proposed application will have peak periods that differ from the general peak periods above, the Planning Commission may require that the analysis be conducted for the alternative peak periods. Trip generation data shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineer’s Trip Generation Manual or actual data about similar developments in Alabama with the same types of uses and site conditions. A traffic study shall be required for all applications that will generate an average daily traffic (ADT) count of 1,000 trips or more, or which will generate 50 trips or more during any peak hour period. An agent selected by the City and paid for by the applicant shall perform the traffic study. The traffic study shall be used to determine what on-site and off-site street or traffic improvements may be necessary due to the development. The Planning Commission may condition the approval of the application on the applicant paying for or constructing those improvements or portions of improvements that are needed due to the traffic impact of the application based on all potential land uses. The traffic study shall include the following data I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 6 along with an analysis of the data: (1) Estimates of trip generation for the proposed development showing projected inbound and outbound vehicle trips for morning and evening peak periods to identify the maximum combined hourly traffic volume associated with the peaking characteristics of the site development combined with the adjacent street traffic. (2) Projected traffic impact and trip distribution on existing and planned streets within the development and at major signalized and unsignalized intersections within ½ mile of the project site (study area) areas likely to be impacted by the development. Intersections of particular concern to the City may be added or omitted from the traffic study at the direction of the Planning Director; (3) Assignment of trips generated by the proposed development on existing and planned streets within the development and areas likely to be impacted by the development and within the project study area; (4) Intersection turning movements and traffic counts on all existing and planned intersections likely to be impacted by the proposed development. Traffic counts must be less than 3 years old to be used as base volumes for the traffic analysis; (5) Corresponding intersection levels of services shall be calculated for the peak periods for the intersections within the study area, utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) latest version, or Synchro traffic software, for the existing conditions and opening year of the project site. Intersections shall be considered deficient if Level of Service (LOS) D is exceeded, and improvements to meet this LOS threshold shall be identified; (6) Site access volumes and major unsignalized intersections within the study area shall be evaluated using the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) to demonstrate the need for installation of a traffic control signal, (7) Auxiliary turn lane requirements shall be evaluated at the site access points to identify if right turn and left turn ingress lanes are needed. Site access points that generate 40 or more right turns in one hour will be required to construct a right turn ingress lane. The need for constructing a left turn ingress lane shall be considered based on the Appendix criteria for left turn lane warrants; (8) Potential mitigating measures or trip reduction options. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.i. List of Names and addresses of all persons to whom notice of a public hearing shall be sent, and the names and addresses of all owners of land immediately adjoining the proposed subdivision as their names appear upon the plats in the county tax assessor’s office, which will be certified or otherwise verified by the County, on the tax records of the County. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1. Certification of Property Owner Notification List Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.j. The applicant shall post on any specific property, which is the subject of the application, on a sign facing each adjacent public street. The sign shall be furnished by the City at the time of application giving notice of the hearing. The sign shall be posted no later than 15 days prior to the hearing before the Planning Commission. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the sign in accordance with these regulations. Failure to post this sign may result in nullification of the subdivision application and approval. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 7 Article IV, Section C.1.k. County Engineer Correspondence In the case of applications for a preliminary plat outside the City limits but within the jurisdiction of these regulations, the applicant shall be required to submit evidence in writing that plans for the subdivision shall have been received by the County Engineer for his/her review. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V, Section A. When lands proposed to be subdivided lie outside the corporate limits of the City, the minimum design standards of Baldwin County shall apply when such standards are more restrictive than those of the City. All approvals of the Commission shall be subject to the more restrictive requirements of Baldwin County and the approval of the County Engineer shall be a condition precedent to approval for construction of improvements. Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.l. Payment of filing fee as specified in the City’s most recent schedule of fees. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.2. Staff Review 2. Staff review – Applicants for a preliminary plat shall first submit the preliminary plat and plans to the Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent for staff’s review. The Director shall determine if the submittals meet all of the requirements of Section C.1., above. Incomplete, partial, or inaccurate submittals will not be accepted, but will be returned to applicant for re-submission for a later hearing. Staff shall review the application and provide comments to the applicant. Following staff review and comments the applicant shall submit revised drawings for review by staff and the Planning Commission. The revised plans submitted shall reflect staff’s initial review comments. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: For the applicant’s information. Article IV, Section C.5. Pre-Construction Conference 5. Pre-construction Conference – An onsite pre-construction conference with City representatives is required prior to initiation of any land disturbance activities. Construction of said improvements shall in no way obligate the Commission to grant Final Approval of the Plat, nor shall it obligate the City Council to accept such improvements for public maintenance. No owner or developer shall proceed with any site work under authority of preliminary plat approval until the completion of the preconstruction conference. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: for the Applicant’s information. Article IV, Section C.6. a. and b. Expiration and Revocation 6. Expiration and Revocation - a. Any substantial deviation from the approved submittals during construction or failure to provide for traffic control, safety, environmental protection controls and/or best management practices and restoration of the site shall be grounds for the immediate suspension of the Preliminary Plat Approval and/or issuance of a stop work order. The Planning Commission shall have the power to reinstate Preliminary Approval when it is satisfied that conditions resulting in suspension have been mitigated. b. If a final plat is not submitted within two years or less after preliminary approval has been given, the preliminary approval shall expire and the preliminary plat shall be null, void and of no force or effect. I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 8 ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: for the Applicant’s information. Article V, Section E.2. Lot Standards – Lot Sizes a. Land Subject to Zoning - Where land is subject to zoning all lots shall fully conform to the requirements of the applicable zoning ordinance. The applicant shall furnish to the commission site drawings to demonstrate compliance. Lots not in compliance shall not have building permits issued unless combined with other lots and reconfigured so as to comply with zoning requirements. b. Land not Subject to Zoning - 1) Lots not subject to zoning shall have lot areas of not less than 15,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet; 2) Where neither public water nor public sewage is available, lot areas and widths shall conform to the requirements of the public health authorities, but in no case shall be less than 100 feet in width and 20,000 square feet in area. c. Insofar as is practicable; side lot lines shall be at right angles or shall be radial to street lines. d. Corner lots for residential use shall be designed with additional frontage, greater than is required for interior lot widths. The additional frontage shall be equal to the difference of the minimum front setback and minimum side setback requirements for any applicable zoning district, for the purpose of allowing building orientation and setback from both front and side streets. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article V, Section E.3.a. Lot Standards – Lot Access a. Except as provided in Section D.6., all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly maintained street. Double frontage lots are prohibited, except where lots consist of more than 66% of a block. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article VI, Section H. Construction Standards-Sanitary Sewerage 1. All subdivisions shall have sanitary sewer service. The sewer service shall be provided by either the Fairhope Public Utilities or an approved sewer service. 2. All sanitary sewer systems constructed within a subdivision and all sanitary sewer systems constructed outside of a subdivision but servicing a subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with those certain “Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities” which is on file at the City of Fairhope Water & Sewer Department. 3. Individual septic tank type systems that have been approved by the Baldwin County Health Department and the Fairhope Public Utilities Sewer Department may be utilized. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities Comments: Construction Standards Article VI, Section A. Construction Standards-General The sub-divider shall be required to install, or construct improvements hereinafter described prior to having released bond or other surety which guarantees the installation of such improvements. All i mprovements required shall be constructed in conformity with these regulations and in conformity with Chapter 19, Streets, Sidewalks, and Other Public Ways, of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Fairhope, as amended. All I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 9 improvements shall be designed and sealed by a Project Engineer. The Project Engineer shall carry Errors and Omissions Insurance at a minimum coverage of at least $1,000,000. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering practice. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended. Comments: Sidewalk should be depicted or a sidewalk waiver shall be required. Article VI, Section G. Construction Standards-Fire Hydrants Fire Hydrants shall be installed along each street at a maximum interval of four hundred fifty (450) feet, or at the ends and center of each block, or as otherwise required by the fire authority having jurisdiction. Water supply and pressure shall be adequate to provide fire protection and for the future needs of the development. Blue reflective markers shall be installed at the street line of streets to indicate the location of fire hydrants. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: The plat does not depict a fire hydrant. Awaiting Fire Inspection comments. Article VI, Section I. Construction Standards-Permanent Monuments Concrete monuments four inches in cross section and three feet long, with a flat top shall be set at all points where the exterior boundaries of the subdivision intersect, including points of curvature and points of tangency on curved boundaries. The top of the monument shall have an "X" indented therein to identify the exact point and the top shall be set flush with grade. All interior lot corners shall be marked with a pipe not smaller tha n three-quarters inch diameter, 24 inches length and shall be driven flush with finish grade. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up correspondence required Comments: Reviewed by: Samara Walley Date of Review: _July 6, 2020____ I I I I I I I I 50%0 0 Fire Inspection Report Inspection / SD 30.26 Shiawasena Subdivision / Shiawasena / Scenic 98 Complete Score Failed items Actions Inspection Type Inspection Inspection for planning department Address SD 30.26 Shiawasena Subdivision Project Name Shiawasena / Scenic 98 Conducted on 13th Jul, 2020 7:01 AM CDT Prepared By S. Garber Contractor/ Owner Name Samara Walley Private & Confidential 1/2 Audit 50% No need for any changes on this property concerning fire hydrant placement. Fairhope Fire Inspector Sandy Garber 13th Jul, 2020 7:07 AM CDT Owner/Contractor/Business Owner Inspection Outcome No Action/ General Comments 0% Private & Confidential 2/2 June 18, 2020 Danielle Doussan Smith Clark 314412 Carroll Rd Prichard, Alabama ATO 2155 OLD SHELL RD Suite MOBILE, Al 36607 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision at 23389 Main St. -PPIN#11586 Dear Ms. Doussan: T: 2514718361 F: 2514710410 www.att.com This letter is in response to your request for information on the availability of service at the above Minor Subdivision by AT&T. This letter acknowledges that the above referenced property is located in an area served by AT&T. Any service arrangements for the Subdivision will be subject to later discussions and agreements between the developer and AT & T. Please be advised that this letter is not a commitment by AT & T to provide service to this Minor Subdivision. Please contact me at the phone number included in this letter with any questions. Thank you for contacting AT&T. Sincerely, Wade Mitchell MGR OSP Planning & Engineering Design Karin \l'iison AtayJr (C!U!li.Jl Members Ke,'in G. B,1011c Roben ,\. Brown Jack Burrell. AC\10 jimmy Conyers Jay Rc0 binson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC Clo• Clrrk Kimberly Creech Ci{V Treasurer 16 l No11h Section Streel P.O. Drawer 429 Fairhope, .\labama .,6533 251-928-2136 2.31-928-6776 Fax 11,1,1·.fairhopcaLgc1· June 17, 2020 Smith Clark LLC Attn: Danielle Doussan P.O. Box 7082 Spanish Fort, AL 36527 Dear Ms. Doussan, Regarding your availability request for the property located at PPIN #11586, with the 911 address of 23389 Main Street. Electric: Is not available through the City of Fairhope. Gas: Gas is available. Gas services will generally be installed at no cost to the owner. We do, however, reserve the right to charge for services that will only connect non-essential gas loads, such as fire logs and/or barbeque grills. Water: Is provided by City of Daphne. Sewer: Is available through the City of Fairhope and will require a grinder pump. Sincerely, Mike Allison Operations Director City of Fairhope, AL Mike.Allison@fairhopeal.gov cc Jay Whitman, Superintendent, Water and Waste Water Department cc Terry Holman, Superintendent, Gas Department cc Jeremy Morgan, Superintendent, Electric Department From:Jay Whitman To:Samara Walley Cc:Tim Manuel; Curtis Cooper Subject:RE: SD 20.36 Shiawasena Subdivision Date:Tuesday, June 30, 2020 10:08:19 AM Attachments:image001.png We only serve sewer in this area. We can provide sewer for this property on the easement area of Main Street/Scenic 98. Thank you Tim Manuel From: Samara Walley <samara.walley@fairhopeal.gov> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 12:34 PM To: Conrad Havranek <conrad.havranek@fairhopeal.gov>; Curtis Cooper <Curtis.Cooper@fairhopeal.gov>; Jay Whitman <Jay.Whitman@fairhopeal.gov>; Jeremy Little <jeremy.little@fairhopeal.gov>; Jeremy Morgan <Jeremy.Morgan@fairhopeal.gov>; Michael Allison <michael.allison@fairhopeal.gov>; Terry Holman <Terry.Holman@fairhopeal.gov>; Tim Manuel <Tim.Manuel@fairhopeal.gov> Subject: SD 20.36 Shiawasena Subdivision All, Please see the attached drawing for the proposed 2-lot subdivision. You will also find Planning Review forms attached for each department. Please fill out the review form and email it back to me by July 6, 2020. Thanks & have a great weekend! Samara J. Walley, MCP City of Fairhope City Planner A: 555 S. Section Street P.O. Box 429 Fairhope, AL 36532 P: (251)928-8003 E: samara.walley@fairhopeal.gov CONTI CT FAIRHOPE AV ROYAL L N CROMWELL A V WEEPINGWILLOW STIDLEWILD DRMORPHY AV MARGARET DR EDINGTON STBRECKINDRKENSLEY AVTHOMPSON HALL RDPECANTRCH O LL O WHAVENSTCity of FairhopePlanning Commission August 3, 2020 ¯ MARGARET DRTHOMPSON HALL RDROYAL LN PECANTRCMORPHY AV ORLEANS DR CONTI CT HOLLOWH A V E N S T W E E P I NGWILLOWSTFAIRHOPE AV SD 20.37 - Fairhope Farms Legend COF Corp. Limits COF Planning Jurisdiction COF Zoning R-1 - Low Density Single-Family R-2 - Medium Density Single-Family R-6 - Mobile Home Park District R-A - Residential/Agriculture District ¯ ¯ ^ Project Name: Fairhope Farms Site Data: 23 acresProject Type: 2-Lot Minor SubJurisdiction: Fairhope Planning Jurisdiction Zoning District: R-APPIN Number: 14632General Location: the west side of Thompson Hall Road between Fairhope Avenue and Morphy Avenue.Surveyor of Record: Smith & Clark AssociatesEngineer of Record: Hunter SmithOwner / Developer: Floyd EnfingerSchool District: Fairhope East Elementary, Fairhope Middle, Fairhope High School Recommendation: Approval Prepared by: Carla Davis lf" ',·{ .-_.,_ ~.t:·'. }\~. ' 1 SD 20.37 Fairhope Farms Subdivision – August 3, 2020 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of FST Floyd Enfinger, applicant for a 2-lot minor subdivision. The property is located on the west side of Thompson Hall Road between Fairhope Avenue and Morphy Avenue. The subject property is approximately 23 acres and the applicant desires to divide the property into two separate lots. The proposed Lot 1 has an existing dwelling on the property and is approximately 13.55 acres (590,419 square feet). The proposed Lot 2 also has an existing dwelling and is approximately 9.20 acres (400,823 square feet). Comments: The subject property is in Fairhope’s Planning Jurisdiction and therefore must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations Article VI Section D requires the provision of sidewalks along all streets in the Planning Jurisdiction of Fairhope. The applicant does not wish to install sidewalks above and beyond the sidewalks that are in place at this time within the City of Fairhope’s right-of-way and is requesting a sidewalk waiver. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing flow patterns will be changed by this replat. Water, Gas, and Sewer services will be provided by the City of Fairhope. Power is supplied by Riviera Utilities and the telephone service is provided by AT& T. It should be noted that the subject site is a Fairhope Single Tax property. The plat should be revised to included a lease hold certificate and a signature block for the Fairhope Single Tax Corporation. Waiver Request: Article VI Section D. Sidewalks requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states, “sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope.” The applicant has provided a letter stating the following regarding the request for a sidewalk waiver: There is an existing sidewalk along the majority of the roadway frontage for this property that appears to direct pedestrian traffic across the street to another sidewalk. The applicant is correct when stating that there are sidewalks along the entire property except for a portion of Lot 1 that has frontage along Morphy Avenue. Although the sidewal ks are within the right-of-way the applicant could theoretically tie into the existing sidewalk and continue the sidewalk for the duration of their property; but there is not an additional sidewalk to connect to once the sidewalk stops at their property li ne. Thus, staff understands the applicants request for a sidewalk waiver. A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in purple) Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following conditions exist: 1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to other land areas. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. 2 SD 20.37 Fairhope Farms Subdivision – August 3, 2020 2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Not applicable for this individual case. 3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations. 4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. 5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowner s, or the public; Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects. 6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done. Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard. The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards : “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Not applicable b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Not applicable c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Follow-Up Activities Required by Staff and/or the Applicant: If it is the pleasure of the Planning Commission to approve subject case, the applicant is advised the final plat must be recorded in the Judge of Probate’s office within sixty (60) days of final plat approval by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission, or the final plat approval is null and void. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of SD 20.37 conditional upon the following: 1.) The approval of a sidewalk waiver. 2.) Revision of the plat to include a lease hold certificate and a signature block for the Fairhope Single Tax Corporation. July 17,. 2020 Ms. Samara Walley City of Fairhope PO Drawer 429 Fairhope, AL 36533 RE: SD 20.37 Fairhope Farms Dear Ms. Samara, Thank you for your thorough review of our application regarding the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. The purpose of this letter is to request that a waiver be considered for the installation of a sidewalk. There is an existing sidewalk along the majority of the roadway frontage for this property that appears to direct pedestrian traffic across the street to another sidewalk. We have updated the plat to reflect staff comments. An additional application with the signature of the Fairhope Single Tax Corporation and an exhibit illustrating an aerial photo and topography is also included. Should you have any questions or concerns please let me know. Sincerely, Hunter C. Smith, P.L.S. P.O. BOX 7082 • Spanish Fort, AL 36577 • (251) 626-0404 hunter@smithclarkllc.com Karin Wilson Mi{YOr Counc,1 Members Kevin G. Boone Robert A. Brown Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Conyers Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC City Clerk Deborah A. Smith, CPA City Treasurer 161 North Section Street P.O. Drawer 429 Fairhope, Alabama 36533 251-928-2136 251-928-6776 Fax www.fairhopeal.gov f'n'nced C'TI recycled paper VIA E-MAIL ATTACHMENT July 8, 2020 Smith, Clark & Associates P.O. Box 7082 Spanish Fort, AL 36577 SD 20.37 Fairhope Farms Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, This review package is derived from various components of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City o_/Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and/or staff recommendations. Staff has reviewed the subject application to determine if the application meets all the requirements of the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. Listed below you will find staffs comprehensive review of items derived from the checklist for the various requirements of the above-referenced submission. Missing or outstanding items, or items requiring revision and resubmission are further described below. The following non-exhaustive list summarizes the outstanding items requiring revision and resubmission or follow-up information for the subject application: • Revise Subdivision Application to include the signature for Fairhope Single Tax Corporation. • Revision of the plat to add a lease hold certificate and a signature block for Fairhope Single Tax Corporation. • Revision of the plat to depict the connecting of a new sidewalk to the existing sidewalk along Morphy Avenue on Lot 1 or the submission of a sidewalk waiver. • Revision of the plat to depict the front yard setback for Lot 1 to be along Thomas Hall Road, the side street setback along Morphy Avenue, and the rear and side yard setbacks to follow based on the revisions while labeling all setback lines. • Revision of the plat to depict the front yard setback for Lot 2 to be along Fairhope Avenue, the side street setback along Thomas Hall Road, and the rear and side yard setbacks to follow based on the revisions labeling all setback lines. • The plat should be revised to actually depict the 15' drainage and utility easements on the front, side, and rear lot lines; as well as the 7 .5' easement on the interior lot lines. • The submission of a contour map at two-foot intervals. • The submission of a topographic survey with an aerial photograph with plat overlay. PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 1 Date of review: June 9, 2020 Project: SD 20.30 Ferry Road Estate Subdivision The following review checklist is derived from various components of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and/or staff recommendations. Additional comments may be depicted on “marked-up” plans. Level of acceptance is indicated with an “x” in the checkboxes below. All comments are indicated in bold italic text. Missing or outstanding items, or items requiring revision and resubmission are further described in the comments section of each item red bold italic text. Preliminary Plat Submission Requirements Article IV, Section C.1. Two (2) copies of the preliminary plat and two copies of all plans shall be submitted initially for staff review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Following staff review and comments, formal submission of the preliminary plat shall include eighteen (18) copies of the preliminary plat and one (1) copy of all plans. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up submittal requested Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(20) Digital copy of all plans in Adobe PDF format Comments: Staff requests the 18 copies of the preliminary plat and 1 copy of all plans be on 11x17 paper. Article IV, Section C.1. Preliminary Plat Application Checklist ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Revise application to include the signature from Fairhope Single Tax Corporation Article IV, Section C.1. Application for Subdivision Plat Approval ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Revise application to include the signature from Fairhope Single Tax Corporation Article IV, Section C.1. Certificate of County Zoning (IF APPLICABLE) ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Memorandum of Transmittal for Extra-Territorial Development (IF APPLICABLE) ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1. Certification of Property Owner Notification List ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 2 Article IV, Section C.1.b.(1) Vicinity map at a scale not less than 1: 9600 ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments Article IV, Section C.1.b.(2) Name and location of the proposed subdivision and names and location of any adjacent subdivisions. The name of the proposed subdivision shall not duplicate or closely approximate the name of any other subdivision covered by these regulations. The Commission shall have the final authority to designate the name of the subdivision. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(3) Names and addresses of the following: • owner • designer • applicant • all associated investors • record owners of lands immediately adjacent to subdivision. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(4) North point, linear and graphic scales, and date. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(5) Contour map at two-foot interval. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Did not receive contour map at two-foot intervals Article IV, Section C.1.b.(6) Blocks and lots with dimensions and bearings for all lot lines and boundaries. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(7) Building set back lines shall be shown on the plat as required by the zoning ordinance or in absence of zoning, as required by deed restrictions. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(8) Plan and profiles of all proposed utilities with connections (8) Plan and profiles of all proposed utility with connections to existing utility system and all proposed improvements. Approval of private utility connections for water and sewer shall be subject to the standards of Article VIII, Sections E. and G., respectively of the Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, and Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Fairhope. The applicant shall submit one copy of utility letters stating I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 3 Article IV, Section C.1.b.(8) (continued) availability of service. Utility letters and layout must be submitted from electric, water, sewer, phone, trash provider, and gas (if applicable), stating the property may be adequately served by such utility. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(9) Location/dimensions of lands to be dedicated or reserved for parks, open space or other public use ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(10) The existing or proposed zoning classification of the subdivision and all contiguous lands. Where there is no zoning in effect, the proposed use of the lots shall be shown on the plat. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(11) Flow model data submitted to the standards of the COF Water Department. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up information pending Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(12) Street lighting plan ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up information pending Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(13) and Article V, Section D.5.a.(9) Tree protection plan for all required street trees or trees over 24” DBH. Tree protection fences shall be installed prior to land disturbance activities. (See Appendix G) ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Ordinance number 1444, Tree Ordinance Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(14) Minimum finished floor elevations for every lot. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Minor Subdivision Article IV, Section C.1.b.(15) Submit a topographic survey with an aerial photograph with plat overlay. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Did not receive topographic survey with an aerial photograph with plat overlay. Article IV, Section C.1.b.(16) Pedestrian circulation plan ☐N/A ☒Accepted w/ conditions ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 4 Comments: No sidewalks or sidewalk easement shown. Need to provide sidewalks or a sidewalk easement and a sidewalk waiver Article IV, Section C.1.b.(17) Site data box including but not limited to: • Total acreage of site • Acreage of common area(s) • Total number of lots • Square footage of each lot • Site Density • Number of units proposed ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(18) Applicants shall provide site data and all applicable permits relative to items such as soils, wetlands, flooding, drainage, natural features and potential archeological features. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: There are hydric soils (wetlands) indicated on the west side of this one. Bb is a hydric soil. Applicant will need a wetland delineation, wetland buffer signage installed and wetland flagging prior to construction or land disturbance permitting. Article IV, Section C.1.b.(19) Maximum drawing size and scale shall be limited to 24"x 36” and 1:100, respectively ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: See Article IV, Section C.1. for staff request regarding eighteen (18) copies of drawings in 11x17 format following initial staff review. Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.b.(20) Digital copy of all plans in Adobe PDF format ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.c. Street Plan Requirements: (1) Location of existing and proposed streets within and adjacent to subdivision (2) Widths and purpose of existing and proposed rights-of-way (ROW) and easements (3) Clear identification of ROW and location of any street included in Master Plan (4) Proposed curb radii for each street intersection or significant street curves (5) Proposed street names Article IV, Section C.1.c. (continued) (6) Typical section for proposed streets, centerline profiles of all proposed streets with finish grades, at a scale of: 1"=50' horizontal and 1"=5' vertical, or 1"=100' horizontal and 1"=10' vertical ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.d. Drainage plan prepared by professional engineer, including proposed method of storm water detention and means of controlling erosion during construction. Any portion of the land in the I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 5 proposed subdivision subject to periodic inundation by storm drainage, overflow or ponding shall be clearly identified on the plat. Lands lying within the flood plain, V or A Zones, shall be clearly identified on the plat. Storm-water detention facilities shall be shown in the plans and calculations provided. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.e. Engineering Plans: all engineering plans shall be signed and stamped by the registered professional engineer of record. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.f. Phased development: where a phased development is proposed, the preliminary plat shall include all phase lines and a master plan showing the continuity of development proposed for the entire project. Each phase shall satisfy the requirements of these regulations individually. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.g. State or County ROW detailed highway improvements plan: If any state right-of-way or any improvement thereon is proposed to be changed or modified, a detailed Highway Improvements Plan, with the written approval of the responsible official of the Alabama Highway Department, showing all existing features within the rights-of-way and all proposed changes, including, but not limited to, changes in traffic patterns, markings, signs, curbs and barriers, neutral zones, signals, warnings, plantings and landscaping. There shall be submitted with and as a part of the Plan a written statement setting forth means proposed for traffic control and safety during construction and for restoration of the site. All of the foregoing shall also apply to rights-of-way controlled by the County, except that the County Engineer's approval shall appear on the Plat to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.h. Traffic Data and Traffic Study: Applications shall include trip generation data showing the projected average daily traffic (ADT) in a 24-hour period and projected peak-hour traffic generated by the development in the subdivision application. Peak hour traffic shall generally be the hours between 7 A.M. and 9 A.M. for morning and 4 P.M. and 6 P.M. for the evening and include the consecutive 60-minute segment in which traffic counts are projected to occur. In instances where the proposed application will have peak periods that differ from the general peak periods above, the Planning Commission may require that the analysis be conducted for the alternative peak periods. Trip generation data shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineer’s Trip Generation Manual or actual data about similar developments in Alabama with the same types of uses and site conditions. A traffic study shall be required for all applications that will generate an average daily traffic (ADT) count of 1,000 trips or more, or which will generate 50 trips or more during any peak hour period. An agent selected by the City and paid for by the applicant shall perform the traffic study. The traffic study shall be used to determine what on-site and off-site street or traffic improvements may be necessary due to the I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 6 development. The Planning Commission may condition the approval of the application on the applicant paying for or constructing those improvements or portions of improvements that are needed due to the traffic impact of the application based on all potential land uses. The traffic study shall include the following data along with an analysis of the data: (1) Estimates of trip generation for the proposed development showing projected inbound and outbound vehicle trips for morning and evening peak periods to identify the maximum combined hourly traffic volume associated with the peaking characteristics of the site development combined with the adjacent street traffic. (2) Projected traffic impact and trip distribution on existing and planned streets within the development and at major signalized and unsignalized intersections within ½ mile of the project site (study area) areas likely to be impacted by the development. Intersections of particular concern to the City may be added or omitted from the traffic study at the direction of the Planning Director; (3) Assignment of trips generated by the proposed development on existing and planned streets within the development and areas likely to be impacted by the development and within the project study area; (4) Intersection turning movements and traffic counts on all existing and planned intersections likely to be impacted by the proposed development. Traffic counts must be less than 3 years old to be used as base volumes for the traffic analysis; (5) Corresponding intersection levels of services shall be calculated for the peak periods for the intersections within the study area, utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) latest version, or Synchro traffic software, for the existing conditions and opening year of the project site. Intersections shall be considered deficient if Level of Service (LOS) D is exceeded, and improvements to meet this LOS threshold shall be identified; (6) Site access volumes and major unsignalized intersections within the study area shall be evaluated using the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) to demonstrate the need for installation of a traffic control signal, (7) Auxiliary turn lane requirements shall be evaluated at the site access points to identify if right turn and left turn ingress lanes are needed. Site access points that generate 40 or more right turns in one hour will be required to construct a right turn ingress lane. The need for constructing a left turn ingress lane shall be considered based on the Appendix criteria for left turn lane warrants; (8) Potential mitigating measures or trip reduction options. ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.i. List of Names and addresses of all persons to whom notice of a public hearing shall be sent, and the names and addresses of all owners of land immediately adjoining the proposed subdivision as their names appear upon the plats in the county tax assessor’s office, which will be certified or otherwise verified by the County, on the tax records of the County. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article IV, Section C.1. Certification of Property Owner Notification List Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.j. The applicant shall post on any specific property, which is the subject of the application, on a sign facing each adjacent public street. The sign shall be furnished by the City at the time of application giving notice of the hearing. The sign shall be posted no later than 15 days prior to the hearing before the Planning Commission. It is the sole responsibility of the applicant to post the sign in accordance with these regulations. Failure to post this sign may result in nullification of the subdivision application and approval. I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 7 ☒N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.k. County Engineer Correspondence In the case of applications for a preliminary plat outside the City limits but within the jurisdiction of these regulations, the applicant shall be required to submit evidence in writing that plans for the subdivision shall have been received by the County Engineer for his/her review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V, Section A. When lands proposed to be subdivided lie outside the corporate limits of the City, the minimum design standards of Baldwin County shall apply when such standards are more restrictive than those of the City. All approvals of the Commission shall be subject to the more restrictive requirements of Baldwin County and the approval of the County Engineer shall be a condition precedent to approval for construction of improvements. Comments: Article IV, Section C.1.l. Payment of filing fee as specified in the City’s most recent schedule of fees. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article IV, Section C.2. Staff Review 2. Staff review – Applicants for a preliminary plat shall first submit the preliminary plat and plans to the Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent for staff’s review. The Director shall determine if the submittals meet all of the requirements of Section C.1., above. Incomplete, partial, or inaccurate submittals will not be accepted, but will be returned to applicant for re-submission for a later hearing. Staff shall review the application and provide comments to the applicant. Following staff review and comments the applicant shall submit revised drawings for review by staff and the Planning Commission. The revised plans submitted shall reflect staff’s initial review comments. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: For the applicant’s information. Article IV, Section C.5. Pre-Construction Conference 5. Pre-construction Conference – An onsite pre-construction conference with City representatives is required prior to initiation of any land disturbance activities. Construction of said improvements shall in no way obligate the Commission to grant Final Approval of the Plat, nor shall it obligate the City Council to accept such improvements for public maintenance. No owner or developer shall proceed with any site work under authority of preliminary plat approval until the completion of the preconstruction conference. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: for the Applicant’s information. Article IV, Section C.6. a. and b. Expiration and Revocation 6. Expiration and Revocation - a. Any substantial deviation from the approved submittals during construction or failure to provide for traffic control, safety, environmental protection controls and/or best management practices and restoration of the site shall be grounds for the immediate suspension of the Preliminary Plat Approval and/or issuance of a stop work I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 8 order. The Planning Commission shall have the power to reinstate Preliminary Approval when it is satisfied that conditions resulting in suspension have been mitigated. b. If a final plat is not submitted within two years or less after preliminary approval has been given, the preliminary approval shall expire and the preliminary plat shall be null, void and of no force or effect. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: for the Applicant’s information. Article V, Section E.2. Lot Standards – Lot Sizes a. Land Subject to Zoning - Where land is subject to zoning all lots shall fully conform to the requirements of the applicable zoning ordinance. The applicant shall furnish to the commission site drawings to demonstrate compliance. Lots not in compliance shall not have building permits issued unless combined with other lots and reconfigured so as to comply with zoning requirements. b. Land not Subject to Zoning - 1) Lots not subject to zoning shall have lot areas of not less than 15,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet; 2) Where neither public water nor public sewage is available, lot areas and widths shall conform to the requirements of the public health authorities, but in no case shall be less than 100 feet in width and 20,000 square feet in area. c. Insofar as is practicable; side lot lines shall be at right angles or shall be radial to street lines. d. Corner lots for residential use shall be designed with additional frontage, greater than is required for interior lot widths. The additional frontage shall be equal to the difference of the minimum front setback and minimum side setback requirements for any applicable zoning district, for the purpose of allowing building orientation and setback from both front and side streets. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article V, Section E.3.a. Lot Standards – Lot Access a. Except as provided in Section D.6., all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly maintained street. Double frontage lots are prohibited, except where lots consist of more than 66% of a block. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article VI, Section H. Construction Standards-Sanitary Sewerage 1. All subdivisions shall have sanitary sewer service. The sewer service shall be provided by either the Fairhope Public Utilities or an approved sewer service. 2. All sanitary sewer systems constructed within a subdivision and all sanitary sewer systems constructed outside of a subdivision but servicing a subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with those certain “Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities” which is on file at the City of Fairhope Water & Sewer Department. 3. Individual septic tank type systems that have been approved by the Baldwin County Health Department and the Fairhope Public Utilities Sewer Department may be utilized. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities Comments: Construction Standards Article VI, Section A. Construction Standards-General I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST 9 The sub-divider shall be required to install, or construct improvements hereinafter described prior to having released bond or other surety which guarantees the installation of such improvements. All i mprovements required shall be constructed in conformity with these regulations and in conformity with Chapter 19, Streets, Sidewalks, and Other Public Ways, of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Fairhope, as amended. All improvements shall be designed and sealed by a Project Engineer. The Project Engineer shall carry Errors and Omissions Insurance at a minimum coverage of at least $1,000,000. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering practice. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended. Comments: Sidewalk should be depicted or a sidewalk waiver and the revision of the plat to depict a sidewalk/ pedestrian easement. Article VI, Section G. Construction Standards-Fire Hydrants Fire Hydrants shall be installed along each street at a maximum interval of four hundred fifty (450) feet, or at the ends and center of each block, or as otherwise required by the fire authority having jurisdiction. Water supply and pressure shall be adequate to provide fire protection and for the future needs of the development. Blue reflective markers shall be installed at the street line of streets to indicate the location of fire hydrants. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: The plat does not depict a fire hydrant. Please revise plat to depict an existing fire hydrant that is within 450 feet or depict the installment of a new fire hydrant. If the applicant can not provide the previous information a waiver request will be required. Article VI, Section I. Construction Standards-Permanent Monuments Concrete monuments four inches in cross section and three feet long, with a flat top shall be set at all points where the exterior boundaries of the subdivision intersect, including points of curvature and points of tangency on curved boundaries. The top of the monument shall have an "X" indented therein to identify the exact point and the top shall be set flush with grade. All interior lot corners shall be marked with a pipe not smaller tha n three-quarters inch diameter, 24 inches length and shall be driven flush with finish grade. ☒N/A ☐Accepted ☐Follow-up correspondence required Comments: Reviewed by: __________________________ Date of Review: ________________________ I I I I I I I I June 18, 2020 Danielle Doussan Smith Clark P.O. Box 7082 Spanish Fort, Alabama 36577 ATO 2155 OLD SHELL RD Suite MOBILE, AL 36607 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision at 9383 Morpphy Ave., PPIN# 14632 Dear Ms. Doussan: T: 2514718361 F: 2514710410 www.att.com This letter is in response to your request for information on the availability of service at the above Minor Subdivision by AT&T. This letter acknowledges that the above referenced property is located in an area served by AT&T. Any service arrangements for the Subdivision will be subject to later discussions and agreements between the developer and AT&T. Please be advised that this letter is not a commitment by AT&T to provide service to this proposed Minor Subdivision. Please contact me at the phone number included in this letter with any questions. Thank you for contacting AT&T. Sincerely, Wade Mitchell MGR OSP Planning & Engineering Design Karin Wilson AJqyor Council !dcmhcrs Kevin G. Boone Robert .-\. Broll'n Jack Burrell. .-\010 Jimmy Conyers Jay Robinson Lisa.-\. Hanks, M~K Cicn7crk Kimberly Crerch OIJ' Trcasw·cr l 61 North Section Street P.O. Drawer 42° Fairhope, Alabama 36553 251-928-2136 25 J-928-6i7t Fax ,1,1,dairhopeal.go1· June 17, 2020 Smith Clark lLC Attn: Danielle Doussan P.O. Box 7082 Spanish Fort, AL 36527 Dear Ms. Doussan, Regarding your availability request for the property located at PPIN #14632 and is a 23 Acre Parcel, with the 911 address of 9383 Morphy Ave. Electric: This is not available through the city of Fairhope. Gas: Gas is available. Gas services will generally be installed at no cost to the owner. we do, however, reserve the right to charge for services that will only connect non-essential gas loads, such as fire logs and/or barbeque grills. Water: Is available on Thompson Hall Rd, Fairhope Ave. and Morphy Ave. Sewer: Is available. Depending on the depth, gravity may be available, or a grinder pump will be required. Sincerely, Mike Allison Operations Director City of Fairhope, AL Mike.Allison@fairhopeal.gov cc Jay Whitman, Superintendent, Water and Waste Water Department cc Terry Holman, Superintendent, Gas Department cc Jeremy Morgan, Superintendent, Electric Department Soil Map—Baldwin County, Alabama (Enfinger, Morphy and Thompson Hall) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/24/2020 Page 1 of 333767403376800337686033769203376980337704033771003377160337668033767403376800337686033769203376980337704033771003377160417160417220417280417340417400417460 417100 417160 417220 417280 417340 417400 417460 30° 31' 26'' N 87° 51' 50'' W30° 31' 26'' N87° 51' 36'' W30° 31' 10'' N 87° 51' 50'' W30° 31' 10'' N 87° 51' 36'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 16N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600Feet 0 35 70 140 210Meters Map Scale: 1:2,370 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. USDA = MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Baldwin County, Alabama Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 6, 2015—Feb 7, 2015 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Baldwin County, Alabama (Enfinger, Morphy and Thompson Hall) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/24/2020 Page 2 of 3 § □ (I D (b 'C1 {j □ .... ~ 181 ,,,....., • +-H ◊ ~ X ~ . .. ~ 0 ~ A. • ~ 0 0 V + .... . . 0 J, p USDA = Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Bb Bibb and Mantachie soils, local alluvium 2.7 11.6% CgA Carnegie very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.6 2.6% GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 2.1 8.9% LaB Lakeland loamy fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes 8.9 38.4% MrA Marlboro very fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 2.1 9.1% NoA Norfolk fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 6.8 29.3% Totals for Area of Interest 23.1 100.0% Soil Map—Baldwin County, Alabama Enfinger, Morphy and Thompson Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 6/24/2020 Page 3 of 3USDA = 50%0 0 Fire Inspection Report SD 20.37 / Fairhope Farms Complete Score Failed items Actions Inspection Type Address SD 20.37 Project Name Fairhope Farms Conducted on 6th Jul, 2020 10:52 AM CDT Prepared By Contractor/ Owner Name Carla Davis Private & Confidential 1/3 Audit 50% Photo 1 2 hydrants will be needed as noted on photo Hydrants will need to be added to protect existing residents Further hydrants will be need Unable to determine at this time with available information Require nearest hydrant location to be noted on site plan of future project to determine hydrant requirements Fairhope Fire Inspector Sandy Garber 7th Jul, 2020 6:18 AM CDT Owner/Contractor/Business Owner Inspection Outcome No Action/ General Comments 0% Private & Confidential 2/3 I --·- Appendix Photo 1 Private & Confidential 3/3 -... 1:1 13 -1 Fairhope • =H ydr{J [l . F:anus Fw:a1Pb1 .......... ,,..... I Fairhope Public Utilities Wastewater Department Planning Review Case Number: SD 20.37 PPIN: 14632 Date Submitted: 6/23/2020 Return to planner by: Monday 7/6/2020 Planner: Carla Davis Project Name: Fairhope Farms Project Location: Located on the west side of Thompson Hall Road between Fairhope Avenue and Morphy Avenue. Number of Lots: 2 Wastewater In service territory: Yes ___ No ___ Residential ___ Commercial ___ Mixed ___ Comment: On this property we can offer water and sewer. The sewer will be pressure sewer only. Main needed on project: Yes ___ No ___ Force ____ Gravity _____ Lift Station Required _____ Main proposed on project: Yes ___ No ___ Size proposed is adequate: Yes ___ No ___ If no, what size main is required: _________________________ Upgrades required to existing system: Yes ___ No ___ If so, what are the upgrades required, main upgrade, new mains, fire hydrants, etc. Any upgrades to the system to meet future needs? If so, what are the upgrades and the incremental costs? Any comments for planner to add to the review for the applicant? Any Costs to be paid by Developer? Wastewater review by and Date: ZC 20.04 Zoning Text Amendment PROPERTY ADDRESS: City-wide PARCEL ID: N/A MASTER PLAN: N/A ZONING DISTRICT: All zoning districts REQUEST: Staff request the passage of an amendment to the Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, Article III.C. Dimension Standards. Specifically, to establish regulations for constructing accessory structures on waterfront lots to read as follows: 5. Waterfront Lots a. Accessory structures may be located in front of principle structures on waterfront lots but may not be located within the required front or side yards. b. Boathouses, which are constructed on waterfront properties, are exempted from the front yard setback requirements for accessory structures; however, they must comply with required side yard setbacks. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends to approve as requested. NEXT STEPS: The Planning Commission’s recommendation for these proposed zoning text amendments will be forwarded on to the City Council for their action. The City Council is the decision-making body for zoning text amendments.