Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-1982 Regular MeetingI II III IV The Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Fairhope met December 6, 1982 at the new Civic Center Complex at 5:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Richard Sanderson, members John Parker, Cindy McBrearty, James P. Nix, Harrell Holder, Roy White, E. Jack Kirk and Robert Mason. Regional Planning Director and Con- sultant Don Pruitt and Zoning Official Bob Lunsford, secretary Betty Rivenbark The minutes of the October 4, 1982 meeting were approved on motion by James P. Nix, seconded by Harrell Holder and unanimousl carried. Under old business, Barbara Manders was given preliminary approva for a two lot subdivision on Winn Lane, subject to approval from the Board of Adjustments & Appeals on 0.7 foot frontage dificienc on said lots. The Adjustment Board met November 15th and granted the variance, therefore final approval was recommended by Bob Lunsford. Harrell Holder so moved, seconded by Jack Kirk motion carried unanimously. Bob brought to the Board's attention a denial of a building permi for property Rosa Mae Benjamin to Barbara Jean Smith a resubdivis of Lot 4, Block 7, Hoyle-Worchester Addition. Key Homes was denied permit for the south half of the lot. It was noted that lot was subdivided without consulting the Commission. Besides being improperly subdivided, the land fronts on McDonald Lane which has only a 20 foot wide right-of-way, a 10 ft. deficiency according to zoning regulations and subdivision regulations require minimum width of 40 feet for street access. Bob reported that Mrs. Benjamin had requested this be withdrawn but asked if Commission wished to take action regarding improper subdivisio Harrell Holder moved to continue to decline permit until a proper subdivision application is submitted. Jack Kirk seconded and motion carried unanimously. Consideration was given to the 23 lot subdivision application presented by FSTC abutting Fairland Avenue and called Fairland Subdivision. Bob's comments were noted in that he needed 1. legal description of property 2. typical street cross-section and 3. 100 year flood boundary on plat. He also handed out copies of the plat for review with the comment that lot #23 is a problem in that the width of the lot does not allow for a utility easement, but easement can serve as part of the side yard. John Parker brought up question about parcel designated as park. Don Pruitt offered that whoever bought lots 9 & 10 split and let them handle responsibility, as although it it is dedicated, may not be maintained by the City unless and until accepted by the City Council for maintenance. Further discussion led to Harrell Holder moving to divide parcel designated as park on plat between lots 9 & 10 but maintain easement. Cindy McBrear seconded and motion carried unanimously. James P. Nix moved that preliminary and final approval be granted subject to this meeting full subdivision requirements(with 3 points noted by Ack Moore) Jack Kirk seconded and motion carried unanimously. An application for preliminary and final plat approval of Troyer Grove, Unit II was presented. Shirley Hoffren being lessee. Bob had commented that there were four conditions he felt ought to be complied with. Being 1, the remaining portion of the leasehold be designated as Lot 3. 2. Execution of owner's and lessee's acknowledgements on the plat. 3. Presentation of written approval of the County Health Department for waste disposal. 4. Approval of the plat by the County Engineer in writing. At this time it was reported that approval from the health department was here and approval from the FSTC. Mrs. Hoffren said there would be no problem in designating the remain- ing portion of the leasehold Lot 3. No. 4 would be approved as soon as taken to Bay Minette for recording. James P. Nix moved for approval subject to the all 4 conditions outlined by Bob Lunsford being met. Cindy McBrearty seconded and motion carried unanimously. V VI Mr. Charles Dyas was recognized and mentioned that he was submitting a rezone application for the eleventh year. The Board advised Mr. Dyas that this would be accepted and advertised for the January meeting and he would have a chance to present a statement at that time. Jack Kirk moved to accept for advertising for the January 3rd meeting at which time a public hearing will be held. John Parker seconded and motion carried unanimously. At this time Mr. Matt Dial came forth and told the Commission Members the problems he was having at his Commercial Park development. He had asked that he be included in the present Paving Assessment Program and now after Ack Moore had gone out to start on his property he found the sub -grade to be muck and and to straighten out the problem.is going to be considerable expense. It was asked if shells was proper and pointed out that blacktop was specified in the ordinance. John Parker asked what the stipulation was when the alleys was approved. At the time it was approved with the understanding that they could be paved at a later date when the road goes through(which is in this assessment program). Mr. Dial went on to tell the Commission of the loading and unloading problems that are presen now at Commercial Park. He remarked that he wished to further develop the area but he feels that it is not being utilized as it was approved for. Mr. Nix pointed out that the M-1 permits th use as long as the parking requirements are being met. Bob related that he was holding a building permit now in an effort to help clear up the parking problems and get the present tenants to conform. That he is doing everything he can to solve this problem short of evicting them, which would put us in line for a lawsuit. Mr. Parker asked what was Mr.. Dial looking for from the Commission and it was determined that he wished for the City to enforce the zoning use as developed. All felt that the City was trying to solve the problem. There being no further business, meeting was duly adjourned. is