HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-01-2020 Planning Commission Agenda PacketPlanning Commission Meeting
June 1, 2020
IMPORTANT UPDATE: Please note that as the City is responding to current
COVID-19 concerns, it is important to keep members of the public, our Planning
Commission, and staff as safe as possible. For that reason, we will conduct the
Planning Commission meeting on June 1, 2020 as a remote video conference
meeting. We will continue to update
https://www.fairhopeal.gov/departments/planning-and-zoning for the latest
information.
The City of Fairhope Planning Commission will hold a virtual public hearing
at 5:00 PM on Monday, June 1, 2020. Microsoft Teams will be utilized to host our
virtual meeting. We will strive to meet the intent of the State’s Open Meetings Act
under unprecedented circumstances. If you would like your comments to be
considered prior to the meeting, please mail comments to the Planning
Department at P.O. Box 429, Fairhope, AL 36533, e-mail
to planning@fairhopeal.gov or hand deliver to 555 S. Section Street (a drop box is
provided outside our front door) by 3:00 PM on Monday, June 1, 2020.
To participate during the public hearings you may join by computer or
smartphone:
Please send a request to planning@fairhopeal.gov. We will send you a calendar
invitation and instructions by 3:00 PM on Monday, June 1, 2020.
You may also join by telephone at: +1 334-530-5148
Access code: 374 995 780#
Please call in 10-15 minutes prior to the 5:00PM start time.
If you are unable to participate by either of the methods above, you may submit a
written request to planning@fairhopeal.gov, or call (251) 990-0214 and we will do
our best to accommodate.
As always, our meetings are also live streamed on YouTube. You may follow
along with the meeting at https://www.youtube.com/user/cityoffairhope.
Our response is changing daily. Please monitor
https://www.fairhopeal.gov/departments/planning-and-zoning for the latest
information.
Karin Wilson
Mayor
Council Members
Kevin G. Boone
Robert A. Brown
Jack Burrell, ACMO
Jimmy Conyers
Jay Robinson
Lisa A. Hanks, MMC
City Clerk
Deborah A. Smith, CPA
City 1/'easurer
161 North Section Street
P.O. Drawer 429
Fairhope, Alabama 36533
251-928-2136
251-928-6776 Fax
www.fairhopeal.gov
Pnnred on recycled paper
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes
City of Fairhope
Planning Commission Agenda
5:00 PM
Council Chambers
June 1, 2020
3. Consideration of Agenda Items:
A. SD 20.18 Public hearing to consider the request of James Scopolites for
plat approval of Gayfer Place, a 3-lot minor subdivision. The
property is approximately 6.18 acres and is located on the
northeast corner of the intersection of Gayfer Road Extension
and Bishop Road.
PPIN #: 43888
B. SD 20.24 Public hearing to consider the request of 68V Pay Dirt, LLC
for Village Subdivision approval of Laurelbrooke Subdivision, a
178-lot division. The property is approximately 59.72 acres
and is located on the east side of State Highway 181
approximately ½ mile north of County Road 24.
PPIN #: 34129
C. SD 20.25 Public hearing to consider the request of CFP Housing, LLC
for plat approval of Mars Hill Subdivision, a 3-lot minor
division. The property is approximately 29.39 acres and is
located on the east side of US Highway 98 and the north side
of County Road 32.
PPIN #: 235003
D. SD 20.26 Public hearing to consider the request of Roberds Brothers,
LLC for plat approval of Roberds Brothers Subdivision, a 2-lot
minor division. The property is approximately 1.62 acres and
is located on the west side of State Highway 181 just south
E. SD 20.27
of Hollowbrook Avenue at 21883 St. Hwy. 181.
PPIN #: 346487
Public hearing to consider the request of Provision
Investments, LLC for preliminary approval of Bishop Road
MOP, a 7-unit multiple occupancy project. The property is
approximately 1.08 acres and is located on the west side of
Bishop Road just north of Gayfer Road.
PPIN #: 383706 and 383707
F. IR 20.02
4. Old/New Business
Request of Tammy Barber, on behalf of Barbara Childress, for
an Informal Review of a proposed 3-lot subdivision. The
property is approximately 16 acres and is located on the
north side of County Road 11 between Lyter Lane and Keller
Road.
PPIN #: 19751
• SD 18.39 Fox Hollow, Phase 3 -Request for 2-year extension of
preliminary plat approval
• Subdivision Regulation Amendment Discussion
• Zoning Ordinance Amendment Discussion
5. Adjourn
1 SD 20.18 Gayfer Place – June 1, 2020
Planning Commission
June 1, 2020
Subdivision Approval
Case: SD 20.18 Gayfer Place Subdivision
Project Name:
Gayfer Place Subdivision
Property Owner /Applicant:
James Scopolites
General Location:
The property is located on
the northeast corner of the
intersection of Gayfer Road
Extension and Bishop Road
Project Type:
Minor Subdivision inside
Fairhope’s ETJ
Number of lots:
3
Project Acreage:
6.18
Zoning District:
Unzoned
PPIN Number:
43888
Surveyor of record:
Moore Surveying Inc
School District:
Fairhope Elementary,
Intermediate, Middle, and High
Schools
Report prepared by:
Samara Walley, MCP
City Planner
Recommendation:
Approve with Conditions
N
N
Subject Site
Gayfer Rd. Ext.
Bishop Rd.
Subject Site
Gayfer Rd. Ext.
Bishop Rd.
.....
■61-~~Dl,o,,q
b.!.C..-•llklL.._.O..Ua
■B-J, '""""R<-,,,n.l<>;li"iD..-ia
■ ~b~T°'"""' ~ .. -.c~-.....,., ~"""
.&j_g,.,.,..., .. ,rcf,-,"'""'Obc,c
.M-I-Uc;"'\ .. ...,,;,,1 □.,;;,,
-~-I-P1~
"IJO"-"'dV,.•o,;._.......
ULuo.lJ~l"II •"--,.
TTI •I!•! ~•P"""""'......, ... .,
~ l\(1>)--Qor~olll"<olW'O
•11<1-~c,·de.,....,._.00'1>in
11-t.ltl.,d;""'tt,,...,.Si'fi"'$'"'")
■11-.!-l+'l"°""-"'Ys.-.i .. ·•-,
N"<}MP.,,ol(,f'l!""S-,0.........,.,.
(:l,;311'•--.S,,,gk,Ml
., .. ~O-l)'M1o.-.h-,,l7
U ,H<~o.r.,1<f\O'...uir9~wo~O<ZioJ
IU-M,,l,•11 r-,HT"""
u.~ .......... .i.s,;"""""-o;.,,.,:ic
•lR-T°"""lla,u1
2 SD 20.18 Gayfer Place – June 1, 2020
Summary of Request:
Public hearing to consider the request of James Scopolites for plat approval of Gayfer Place Subdivision, a 3-
lot minor subdivision. The property is approximately 6.18 acres and it located on the northeast corner of the
intersection of Gayfer Road Extension and Bishop Road.
Comments:
The subject property is in Fairhope’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction and therefore must follow Fairhope’s
Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor
subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly.
The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a
tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable.
The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing
flow patterns will be changed by this replat. The City of Fairhope will provide water, sewer, power and gas
services. AT&T will provide services as well.
The preliminary plat illustrates a 2-lot subdivision at the intersection of Gayfer Road Extension and Bishop
Road. Existing sidewalks are shown along Gayfer Road Extension. There are no sidewalks along Bishop Road.
If approved, the plat should be revised to illustrate sidewalks or a sidewalk easement along Bishop Road. It
should be noted that there is an existing residence, mobile home and shed located on the proposed Lot 1
and a residence and two sheds on proposed Lot 2. Lastly, it should be noted that the proposed Lot 2 will
have two street frontages.
It should be noted that this application was heard at the May 4, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. The
Commission tabled the application due to concerns regarding the configuration of the lots, proximity to a
fire hydrant, and construction of sidewalks.
Waiver Request
Article VI Section D. Sidewalks requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states,
“sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope.”
The applicant has provided a letter requesting a waiver of the required sidewalk along Bishop Road. In lieu of
a sidewalk, they are requesting a 15’ easement along Bishop Road for future sidewalks.
Article VI, Section G. Fire Hydrants requirement in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations which states,
“fire hydrants shall be installed along each street at a maximum interval of four hundred fifty (450) feet, or
at the ends and center of each block, or at otherwise required by the fire authority having jurisdiction.”
The applicant states that an existing fire hydrant is located at the corner of Bishop and Gayfer Road
Extension. The applicant also states that each lot is within 450’ of an existing fire hydrant.
A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in blue)
Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following conditions exist:
1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual
topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to
other land areas.
Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Though no hardship is presented, currently there are sidewalks in the
nearby vicinity. Sidewalks would be required at the time of any construction.
Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The applicant has not presented an extraordinary hardship and
states that existing hydrant is within the required 450’.
3 SD 20.18 Gayfer Place – June 1, 2020
2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider.
Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Not applicable for this individual case.
Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: Not applicable for this individual case.
3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations, the
Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan.
Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff finds that this waiver will not nullify the intent of the regulations.
However, the applicant will be required to meet the requirement at the time of any new construction.
Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: As stated, fire hydrants must be located within 450’ of the subject
property. Though the hydrant is within 450’ of the property lines of each lot, it is well over 450’ from the
dwelling. Staff has consulted with the Fire Department and reserves the right to allow their department
to determine if the dwelling is safely accessible, if trucks can maneuver, etc.
4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship;
Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Because Staff is recommending that sidewalks be established at the
time of development, the waiver would be minimum deviation from the required standard.
Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The existing fire hydrant is within 450’ of the proposed lots. Staff
has consulted with the Fire Department and reserves the right to allow their department to determine if
the dwelling is safely accessible, if trucks can maneuver, etc. It should be noted that the construction of
fire hydrants will trigger the requirement of a 2-lot major subdivision.
5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowners, or the public;
Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: No, the waiver shall not have adverse effects.
Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: The absence of a fire hydrant within the appropriate radius could be
a potential safety concern for surrounding properties.
6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done.
Article VI Section D. - Sidewalks: Staff is neutral on this standard.
Article VI, Section G. - Fire Hydrants: Staff has consulted with the Fire Department and reserves the right
to allow their department to determine if the dwelling is safely accessible, if trucks can maneuver, etc.
The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article VB.2 Approval Standards:
“2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the
subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and
development as proposed, due to any of the following:
a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s
Zoning ordinance, where applicable;
• Not applicable
b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or
program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a
Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;
• Not applicable
c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;
• Please see the various waivers more fully-described above
d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and
regulations; or
• Meets
e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the
planning jurisdiction of the City.”
• Staff respectfully defers the evaluation of this criteria to the City of Fairhope Planning
Commission. Staff is recommending DENIAL of the application. If it is the pleasure of
4 SD 20.18 Gayfer Place – June 1, 2020
the City of Fairhope Planning Commission to approve Case number SD 20.18, staff has
noted below possible approval scenarios the Planning Commission may wish to
consider.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends DENIAL of SD 20.18 based upon non-conformance with the subdivision regulations.
If it is the pleasure of the Planning Commission to APPROVE case number SD 20.18, staff presents to the
Planning Commission three (3) possible approval scenarios it may wish to consider:
1. Acceptance of the requested fire hydrant and sidewalk waivers as requested and approval of the minor
subdivision as a concurrent preliminary and final plat approval.
a. The Planning Commission may wish to rule upon Article V.B.2.e regarding health, safety, welfare,
or property.
2. Non-acceptance of one or more of the requested waivers, and approval of case number SD 20.18 as a
preliminary plat in lieu of a concurrent preliminary/final plat as is typical of a minor subdivision.
a. The applicant will have two years to install the necessary improvements, appear before the
Planning Commission for a final plat request, and recording of a final plat.
b. If case number SD 20.18 is approved using approval option “2”, the applicant may wish to contact
the City of Fairhope Public Works Department to determine if the sidewalks may be installed by
the City utilizing an aid-to-construction fee.
3. Partial acceptance of the fire hydrant and sidewalk waivers and approval of case number SD 20.18 as a
minor subdivision with the following conditions to be noted on the plat:
a. Sidewalks and a fire hydrant must be installed on the proposed lot “2” ROW at the time of any
vertical construction activities and shall be a condition of receiving final occupancy approval.
b. Sidewalks must be installed on the proposed lot “1” ROW at the time of any new vertical
construction or class 3 renovation of existing structures on proposed lot “1”, and installation of
sidewalks shall be a condition of receiving final occupancy approval.
c. A signature block for the City of Fairhope Building Official shall be included on the plat.
Not to ScaleEXISTING SIDEWALKOWNER S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE: STATE OF ALABAMA) COUNTY OF BALDWIN) This is to certify that, I the undersigned do hereby certify that I am the Owner of the within plotted ond described lands and that I have caused the same to be surveyed and subdivided as indicated hereon, for the uses and purposes herein set forth ond do hereby acknowledge and odopt the some under the design ond title heron indicated, and grant all easements and dedicate all Streets, to the public or private uses as noted on this plat. JAMES M. SCOPOLITES NOT ARY PUBLIC: STATE OF ALABAMA) BALDWIN COUNTY ) Date I, --------------~ a Notary Public, in and for said State and County, do hereby certify thot the obove nome/s signed to the within OWNERS ACCEPTANCE ond who ore known to me, that they voluntarily executed soid ACCEPTANCE on this dote. Given under my hand and seal this the ____ day of ________ 2020. Notary Public -Baldwin County, Alabama My Commission Expires: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF UTILITIES BY CITY OF FAIRHOPE for GAS, & WATER: POWER The undersigned, as authorized by The City of Fairhope, hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Office of the Judge of Probate,Baldwin2Q:ounty, Alabama, this the __ _ day of 20-2.11.. Authorized Representative GAS Authorized Representative WATER Authorized Representative Power CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION This plat has been submitted to and considered by the City of Fairhope Planning Commission and is hereby approved. Dated this the __ day of _______ 20 __ Secretary or Authorized Representative CERTIFICATE OF THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR: The undersigned, as Director of the Baldwin County Planning and Zonning Department, hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Judge of Probates Office, Baldwin County, Alabama, on this the ___ _ day of-----~ 20 __ Planning Director COUNTY ENGINEER: The undersigned, as County Engineer of Baldwin County, Alabama, hereby approves the within plat for the recording of same in the Probate Office of Baldwin County, Alabama, this the _____ doy of ________ 20 __ County Engineer Existing Fire Hydrant ¢-SITE DATA: 11~· ===i'=l=~=~~;;::;;;:;;:;:;Jl ,~==ik-"r~=r=:rnn=~l~I L CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BALDWIN COUNTY E-911 ADDRESSING A BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL MEET OR EXCEED 1. Total Number of Lots 2, Project Size 6. 18 Acres Smallest Lot 1.518+/-ACRES Largest Lot 4.662+/-Acres STATE HWY#104 LJ --~ -l_ ~ -The undersigned, as aurhorized by the Baldwin County E-911 Board, hereby approves the Road names as depicted on the within plat and hereby approves the within plat for the THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, BALDWIN COUNTY, AND ALABAMA DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AS PER THE 2016 HANDBOOK (ADEM). -2. The Lots are served by -~ WJJ □ f-,-~ rT Recording of same in the Judge of Probates Office, Baldwin County, AT & T Communications (BELLSOUTH) -Telephone City of Fairhope Water, Gas, Power -Auburn University Gulf Coast ffi1f'iii: Alabama, on this the __ day of ________ 20_. -It---.' v= THE FINISH FLOOR SHALL BE 16-INCHES ABOVE THE HIGHEST GRADE NEXT TO THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE. Sewer Existing Residence has Septic Systems Experiment Station Authorized Representative Signature 3. Property lies Outside the City of Fairhope. ·c::i :;l l I f-II . I "O 0 0 "' "O • > 0 Cl. >, 0 ~ I -0 I ~ ~ ~ "' °' <( b 0 <D ~ P. 0 :I:: "O lf)_ ...... 0 0 "' i:q -0 • "' "O w w I " I "' . VJ I "' I f-. 0, u • VJ -0 ... ..... w VJ -0 C • C C 0 u "' VJ L ' .. ~ "' m o 8 6~ ~ 4. Property is NOT Zoned. Building Setbacks FRONT 30 Feel REAR 35 Feet SIDE 10 Feet Unless Otherwise Noted Hereon. NO NEW Streets or Utility Lines this Project at this time. Easements ore as shown hereon. FLODD CERTIFICATE: I also state that I have examined the current FIA Official Flood Hozard Map, Community Number O 15000, Panel Number 0642 M, (01003C0644 M) and found referenced lot above lies in Flood Zone X, Map Dated April 19, 2019. MEADOWBROOK Subdivision UNIT I Recorded Map Book 11, Page 91, & Map Book 11, Page in 105 '° 815 "' o ZONED R-3 "ii Q I D :a ll):::i ro ~ Ol 01. 01 ~ztO O1.D-, u, "' ...J u, MEADOWBROOK Subdivision UNIT II Recorded in Mop Book 11, Poge 81 0 ~ 0 <ri 05-46-02-09-0-000-016.011 RIVENBARK, R L 8c BETTY E 5841 RIVENBARK LN FAIRHOPE AL 36532 Lot 10 ..... cnii:...Jn o .::! o 8w N ocn,,...J uh-cd r (D~ 1 ~on [ ', [ I <C ..-o ...... .,... -J2 c:oa:: -o oa::a::an oNW8w oz o w -111< O...J J~o~ I I I I za::a.. 6~ 6 q :::i: 5 °~ 1 w 9 ol--Z...J tOWCIIO gCII 00 tO ~ <ld ~old ~ ooo~~N 08 1 <w< [ , [ va::o:r: 1,. N N O o ,-, I"') N No~ I I 3:o!;!;; o ~ I ,., I C!>w...-J 6: ~ 6~6:8 I ...J :a 9z0~ [ [ :g:5:g~ 1 ~zw 90::2~ 0 wct:~t0.,0 -o:5 r<"l I <01"') 0wztO < o 0m ,...JI"') cnzJn 0° ·g ooz , O>"T"...... li::...Jl'l '° o I i [ .... oo :r:o,., a I u...J< o .... LL...J '"o ~~o~~E~iE0PL022Ei1a6Ngio l~ii I I, I Lot 44 /,, ,, ~~6~ ~~6~ 9 ~~~ iq 9~5 ~g:: ~~8~ 8550 Southwood Court -......_ on...-LL. / , I c~~ I 3:~w ~o~g r--~~ow 1....,~n. 1 oct:n. Fairhope, Al 36532 -......_ I I I / / ~UJ·rn0 ~:zrn~ 1 ...J:r:ow Cl ~~ffi~ ~<nro~ w~ID~ '--......_J 't B[ / / I <ro~ I <eoI g...Ju::i!:d ~ o1--...-:r: [ I >og;; "'f'.::lfrla:: Existing 7.5' Drninoge &: Utility Easement C -..,o , [ / anu..-<( Lot 45 Lfl(!)([)Q;; 1 Or-,.fil ·;. I xanQ;; ID<,<C LOWIO:.i: -......_ / o3rgLL 0010< wa..,NO w www< [ OCJULL ODt:oLL. ._J I I,, / .... HDLL '<tUUf"l:::i l '<tUJCOLL ~ Lot 9 '-V / >->-[ Q. ZONED R-4 -----w I-"' ~ Fairhope 0 111111 5 1a11 .-Gayfer R, -X f-.ll-'-1LLL1Y11.Y-L--l"\-f=1ISchool T r--~ • 1 lntermeatiatE ->-' h -c.,.k,:, '" U. rr; 1 L .la ih+rMr1m1FfTilm I 111 W I I VICINITY Lot 51 I I --i --MAP ----·-·-·----------------+--·-·~,=~----·-·-·------------------___ '--:,.__....,,'-""t'' -r-_L__S_89°~2'._ 45."__E __ 897.98'._ __ ~ }°0_t _46 __ Lot 47 _ ~, Lot 48 ~ ii Lot 49 _ -/«: ___ L_ot __ 5_o _____ J=------387.83' 'I/ -, 70, 19' ·,r· 69.87' 70. l-4-' ;..-,t'.: _ _,,_ _______ ...,.. __ .,..,_ ___ =,..c-.,.._--,!!:":-:;-::;-::1r----,,--------...,..--.,..--;,---"ef-"".'"~"".'"~"'.'!°--...,..--.,..--.,...--,.._ .... _.,-',._,;;;::!'7:::: ..... ,......J...:-=l/::-::c:-:....,_ __ ...,.__~...,,..-:;,--<>:::: .... -_,.!F==.==;;;;j,=.::=~>-----""-"'C....,_ __ "1<--r'Faund Concrete Monument 'I' •• •• W' F 35.2' SIP_ 547.77' 10' Drainage & Utility Easement Found Crimp Top Pipe ire ence 175.21' SIP 175.00' '-. -"' 0) 0) N sc 0 "' 0 0 ' 0 0 z -rr------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ci s 89° 57' 45" E 10' Drainage & Utility Eosement I I I 1--,.,-------------------------------------------------7.5~~a-;-&Utmt~~~---------------------l =======-·---·---·---·---·--II I -~ -------------------------------Nsg• 57'45"-W-723.09' _____ 7.5' D,o;oo..,._& utmtl._f•"-'------------------I 1,-1 t Shed I 35' BSL _J l •I N 00° 13' 30" w I I' [fl I I Lot 55 05-46-02-09-0-000-0 16.065 BREWER, DIANA J 8713 GROVE CIR FAIRHOPE AL 36532 ! ---------------------------3-5~-B-S~-------------------------------------------35-'B_S_L ---44"51' ----~iL s~~_--J-~ i y E,d,Ucg 7.5' D,a;cog, & Utffity Eo .. mect ,;I N 890 57, 45,, l'=_ -11 (/JI _,<fl I 05-46-02-09-0-000-016.066 w I AIKIN, ROGER C & LAUREL A ""I 35.00' --,' [ [ w [ [ 8711 GROVE CIR ITT ~ I I I O I FAIRHOPE AL 36532 I [ . Lot 56 -~1 'I I I -LOT 1 I ;:i "I 11 I 66,124+/-Sq. Ft I I~ ~I _, "g '[ 'I 1.518+/-Acres rtJ-[N ZONED R-3 I;.. [fl LOT 2 ~ !1 "li[ / i!~ I l<fl 203,076+/-Sq. Ft i o ,,_, ___ _ oi o 4.662+/-Acres I [ ~[ 0 ~ I I~ "' 11 i ~ ~ j l l ;Y '"i SC ~ I ,o-•' I ~ I , r--~ 5 I 'I ii' iii ; I I I Mobile Home I w 0 "' 0 0 0 I I . I I ;-,, " -~ I ...JII ~II.-g ~ (/) lfl!1 1!g i ~: ~ Residence 2!1 l!z 3! I Ii ii I 'I I' c_-1 I L ___________________________ 30'_ BSL ____________________________________________ 30' BSL _________ _J[ 1L_ 30' BSL ---------1 I I I ~ Is SIPL ________________ 10' Drainage & Utility Easement-----547.77' N 390 57' 45" w -----------------------10' 2D~~i~~~e & Utility Eoseme~1----..l _L ___ 14o.oo--;---'.'.:_ ___ _J~ ~1 05-46-02-09-0-000-016.067 FRENCH QUARTERS LL C 216 SIMON ST FAIRHOPE AL 36532 Lot 57 05-46-02-09-0-000-016.068 VEST AL, JASON CARL &: JENNIFER 8708 GROVE CIR FAIR HOPE AL 36532 Lot 58 FPT N 89' 58' 45" W 140.0' Msd SURVEYORS NOTES: 1 All measurements were made in accordance with U.S. Standards. 2 Description as furnished by Client. 3 There may be Recorded or Unrecorded Deeds, Easements, right-of-woys, or other instruments that could affect the Boundaries of soid properties. -4-There was NO attempt to determine the existence, location or extent of any Sub-surface features such os Septic Tonks, Underground Utilities, Footings, etc. 5 Bearings aid Distances shown hereon were "Computed" from actual field traverses. 6 The Basis of Bearings for this Survey ore Based on Grid North as established by G. P. S. Real Time Network R. T. K., referenced to NA□ 19B3, Alabama West Zone. 7 There wos NO attempt mode to locate any Environmental issues such as but not limited to Wet Lends, Fuel Tanks, etc. 8 Owner Must Verify Wetlands Location if Shown on Survey with the proper authorities before any construction is to be started. 9 Refer to Recorded Deeds, Plats, Restrictive Covenants for any additional Information. 1 O Measurements of the Residence ore exterior dimensions and are not to be used for calculating square footage of Residence. 11 Flood Zones are scaled from the current FEllolA maps. 12 Limits of proposed Residence to be stoked are as per clients instructions. 13 Verify any Buildin~ Setbacks and Building location with the proper authorities before ony construction can begin. 1-4-This Plat or Map is the property of t.1oore Surveying fnc. and Seth Moore. It is Solely for the use of the Client Named hereon and may not be used by a Third Party. 15 This Survey is Valid for 30 days from the dote of survey and it is NOT Transferable to a Third Porty and may NOT be used for ony other purpose without prior written consent from Moore Surveyin9 Inc., or Seth Moore. 16. This Survey is based upon existing monumentation found as hereon states ond does not purport to represent a retrocement of the Government Si.rvey. BSL = Building Setback Line FPT = Found Crimp Top Pipe FOTP = Found Open Top Pipe ~r--N_o_o_"_o_o_• _50_"_w __ 3_o_._o_• ___________________ • ____ • _____ • __________________ N __ 8_9_•_5_7_' _4_5_"_W __ 8_9_9_.0_8_' ___ s_1_p __________________________ s_1p ___________________ ,,_und Concrete Monument S 89° 57' 45" E 30.0' O' OWNER/ DEVELOPER 05-46-02-09-0-000-016.000 PIN: 43888 SCOPOLITES, JAMES M 8613 GAYFER AVE EXT FAIRHOPE AL 36532 Edge of Road 50' 100' 60' Right-of-way Paved Road GA YFER ROAD EXTENSION Existing Sidewalk 150' MOORE SURVEYING, INC. PROFESSION AL LAND SURVEYING 555 NORTH SECTION STREET, FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 PHONE (251) 928 -6777 Email mooresurveying@bellsouth.net I, Seth W. Moore, a Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, hereby state that all parts of this survey and drawing have been completed in accordance with the requirements by the Standards of Practice far Land Surveying in the State of Alabama to the best of my Knowledge, information and belief, this is a true and correct map. All according to my survey made this the ___ day of ____ _ 2020. I also state that this drawing and or certification does not reflect any title or easement research, other than what is visible on the ground or provided by the clients at time af survey. Seth W. Moore, P .LS. Ala. Reg. No. 16671 JOB NO. 2020 50 DATE 3/20/2020 ~ FC = Fence Corner FIELD WORK r:,::i R -Rocfus DATE 3/17 ~ ARC = Arc Len th DRAWN BY ...:I TEL = Tele hane BM = Bench Mak swm SCALE 1 " -50' REVISIONS • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COMMENCING at the Southwest Corner of the Southeast corner of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 2 East, St. Stephens Meridian, Baldwin County, Alabama, run South 89 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 30.0 feet to a point; thence run North 00 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 30 feet to an iron pin marker at the Northeast inter section of Gayler Road Extension and Bishop Road for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue North 00 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds West, along the Eost Right-of-way line of Bishop Road o distance of 299.51 feet to an iron pin marker being the Southwest corner of Meadowbrook Subdivision Unit II as recorded in Map Book 11, Poge 81 in the Judge of Probate' s Office, Baldwin County, Alabomo; thence run South 89 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds East, along the south boundary of said Meadowbrook Subdivision a distance of 547.77 feet to a concrete monument being the Southwest corner of Lot 44, Unit I of Meadowbrook recorded in Map Book 11, Page 91 and Ammended in Map Book 11, Page 105; thence continue South 89 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds Eost, along the south lot line of lots 45 through 50, a distance of 897.98 feet to a concrete monument; thence run South 00 degrees 13 minutes 30 seconds East, along the West lot line of lots 56, 57 and 58, a distance of 299.51 feet to a concrete monument lying on the North Right-of-way line of Gayler Road Extension; thence run North 89 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds West, along said North Right-of-way line a distance of 899.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. GAYFER PLACE SUBDIVISION Property lies in Section 9, T-6-S, R-2-E
1 SD 20.24 Laurelbrooke Village Subdivision – June 1, 2020
Planning Commission
June 1, 2020
Case: SD 20.24 Laurelbrooke Subdivision
Village Subdivision
Project Name:
Laurelbrooke Subdivision
Project Type:
Village Subdivision
Applicant Name:
68V Pay Dirt, LLC
Owner:
Joanne L Pizzotti
Site Data:
Number of lots: 176
Total Acreage: 59.72
PPIN Number
34129
General Location:
The East side of State Hwy 181
approx. ½ mile north of
County Road 24
School District:
Larry Newton School,
Fairhope Middle, & High School
Recommendation:
Denial
Prepared by:
Carla L. Davis
Planner
Subject
Site
Subject
Site
N
t
Lege nd
•--•••SubjectParoel
.73 fl
CITY OF FA IRHOPE ZON ING
Zoning
~TRTouristResort
-R-AResidenlial/A(lrio.,ltureOislrid
R-1 LowDensfySngle-famly
[[ll]]R 1(a)
~R 1(b)
~R1(C)
-R-2 Me<:li.lm OensityS i'lg1e-famity
-R-JH igll Oensty Single..famly
R-l PGH Pati o/Garden Single Fa mily
LJ R-lntTow:thouseS i'1 91efaml y
-R-'LowDenstyMuti•hmily
R..S High OenstyOweling Reulenlial
-B--1 Local Shop111ngDistrid
B--2 General Busin essOistrid
-B-3aTouristResortlodgilgDistrid
-B--JbTouri lllResortCommercial ServiceDistrict
-6--C Busin-andProi!ssional Oistrict
-M-1 lighllnduslrial 0 istrid
-P-1 P1 rki1 9
PUO Planne<I Uni Development
2 SD 20.24 Laurelbrooke Village Subdivision – June 1, 2020
Summary of Request:
The applicant is seeking approval of a Village Subdivision as contemplated by Article IV, Section F. of the City
of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. The subject property is located on the east side of State Highway 181
approximately ½ mile north of County Road 24 and is within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of
Fairhope. The proposed development will consist of three separate phases. The initial Phase One is planned
to start construction in January 2021. Phase Two of construction is scheduled for June 2022, and Phase
Three is anticipated to start approximately January 2024; with all the above dates subject to change
dependent upon the market.
The Village Subdivision process is similar to that of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for zoned areas,
however the criteria for a Village Subdivision is a component of the subdivision regulations and therefore
final approval authority of the Village Subdivision resides with the Planning Commission – the City Council
does not consider the Village Subdivision site plan application. Further, subject development will remain in
the City of Fairhope extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and will remain unzoned – subject application does not
request an annexation petition into the City of Fairhope as no areas contiguous to subject property are
within the Fairhope city limits. There is an existing concrete business to the south of the property, a dirt pit
operation to the east, and farmland to the north and also west of highway 181. It should be noted that it is
possible that future development patterns may emerge that will produce zoned properties contiguous to
subject property that may allow a future annexation, a specific development pattern allowing an eventual
annexation is not known at this time.
The map below enlarges the zoning map included on the cover page of this staff report to depict the nearest
properties which all appear to be outside the City Limits of Fairhope and therefore unzoned.
Subject
Site
Airport
Authority
3 SD 20.24 Laurelbrooke Village Subdivision – June 1, 2020
Once village subdivision site plan approval is attained, the preliminary and final plat process is utilized much
like a typical subdivision, with the approved Village Subdivision site plan governing the development of the
village subdivision. In accordance with Article IV, Section F.4. the village subdivision site plan approval
stands for six (6) months during which time a preliminary plat for at least the first phase of the development
shall be submitted.
The narrative provided by the applicant does state that there will be three separate phases, the proposed
number of lots to be developed within each phase is not identified. The applicant is proposing to develop
176 lots on 59.72 acres. The plat depicts the lots as being 60’ in width and 140’ in length (however some lots
will range between 140’ and 145’ in depth). The proposed setbacks for the lots are 20’ in the front and rear
yard, and 10’ on the side lot lines and 15’ on the street sides. Article V Section E.5.a. requires 15’ drainage
and utility easements on the side and rear lot lines, which may lie equally on either side of adjacent lots. The
15’ easements are not depicted on the plat, however, will be required for final plat approval. As proposed,
the smallest lot size will be 8,400 square feet and the largest lot size will be 20,908 square feet. The dwelling
units as proposed will range from 1,642 square feet to 2,058 square feet. The common areas represent
12.76 acres with 10 acres (16.74%) of the site being designated as green space which includes the lake.
When conducting the density analysis staff looked at the number of residential units on each property
within a ¼ mile radius of the subject property as well as the acreage of each property. The analysis area,
minus the subject property, is 429.4 acres and only contains 16 residential units. That translates into an
actual development density of 0.037 units per acre which is extremely low. The requested density of the
development is 176 units on 59.72 acres, for a requested density of 2.95 units per acre. The subdivision
regulations state that unzoned areas requires a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet and a minimum lot
width of 100 feet; thus, allowing approximately 1.47 units per acre and roughly 100 total lots within the
development. The applicant however is requesting density of 2.95 units per acre and 176 total lots. Staff also
used the total square acreage of the site (59.72 acres) and deducted the estimated amount of greenspace,
drainage, and ROW while using the required lot dimensions for unzoned property and the density was
approximately 1.75 units per acres. This is still 70% higher than would normally be allowed for unzoned
properties in Fairhope’s ETJ . Both of staff’s calculations are substantially lower than the 2.95 units per acre
that the applicant has currently proposed.
As proposed the subject site consist of 176 single family lots with one main entrance along Highway 181,
with a 30’ ingress/egress easement to serve as an emergency vehicle only road which also is accessed from
Highway 181. The ingress/egress easement will be designed and constructed to support fire apparatus and
the entry point will be gated to prevent any other use other than emergency vehicles.
The plat also depicts several commons areas, with a lake that will also sever as a stormwater detention pond
for the overall development, as well as a pool and cabana that will be located at the south end overlooking
the lake. The narrative also states that there will be a pocket park on the eastern side of the development.
It should be pointed out that a tree survey is required, but has not yet been submitted. The elevations of the
amenities (pool house/ cabana) have not been submitted but can be submitted at a later date.
All infrastructure, including roadways, drainage, and utilities, will be constructed in accordance to the most
restrictive standards of the County and the City of Fairhope and/ or the respective utility companies. The
development will be served by the City of Fairhope for water service, Baldwin County Sewer Service for the
sewer, Baldwin EMC for electrical service, and AT & T for phone service.
4 SD 20.24 Laurelbrooke Village Subdivision – June 1, 2020
The City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, Article IV. F.1. provides the following purpose for the Village
Subdivision requested for subject property:
Purpose - The subdivision standards established in these regulations are the minimum required standards
to promote the health, safety and welfare of the jurisdiction, promote good civic design, and implement
the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The Village Subdivision regulations in this Section F. are intended to
provide an alternative to the standard subdivision regulations. The Village Subdivision regulations in this
Section F. encourage imaginative design, planning, and environmental sensitivity based on a
comprehensive, site-specific plan, and which enhance the development’s ability to implement the
Comprehensive Plan. The applicant may elect to apply for these alternative standards at its sole discretion.
Use of these alternative standards requires a minimum of three (3) acres of property.
The City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, Article IV. Section F.2.a. – 2.c. further defines the requirements
of a Village Subdivision:
Application/Approval Procedures -
a. The application procedure for a Village Subdivision shall be the same as for any Preliminary or
Final Plat. Fees shall be paid accordingly.
b. A Site Plan that adheres to the requirements below shall be submitted to the Planning
Commission for consideration prior to or in conjunction with the Preliminary Plat.
c. A Site Plan as approved becomes the tool that governs development of the property. Any and all
plats of the property must be in substantial conformance with the site plan as determined by the
Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent. A site plan may not be substantially modified
after approval without the re-approval of the Planning Commission.
As mentioned above, part of the purpose of the Village Subdivisions are to provide an alternative to the
standard subdivision regulations and encourage imaginative design, planning, and environmental sensitivity.
As presented, the plan does not appear to depict “imaginative design” nor does it display innovative design
standards with the current layout of the site. As proposed, the plat greatly exceeds the density for this area.
Furthermore, the current plat does not depict a vast range of lot sizes nor does it incorporate a variety of
amenities considering the amount of units proposed.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of case SD. 20.24 Laurelbrooke Village Subdivision due to the fact it creates a
higher-density development that is not appropriate in an area that is essentially undeveloped; however,
staff does not object to tabling the request to a future meeting to allow revisions by the applicant.
JOHN V. DUCK (1926•2001)
WM. DANIEL CALHOUN, l'.C.
LEAH E. MEGGINSON, r.c.
DUCK, CALHOUN & MEGGINSON
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
319 MAGNOLIA AVENUE
FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532
(251) 928.2191
May 22, 202 0
Mailing Address:
POST OFFICE BOX 1188
FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36S33
FAX (251) 928•2940
VIA: U.S. Mail, e-mail -planning@fairhopeal .aov & Hand Delivered
City of Fairho pe
Planning Commissio n
P.O . Box 429
Fairhope, AL 36533
RE: Proposed Laurelbrooke Subdivision
Case: SD 20.24
Dear Members of the Planning Commission:
I represent Creekwood, LLC, which owns an approximate forty (40)
acre parcel of property located immediately to the north and adjoining
the proposed Laurelbrooke Subdivision.
Creekwood, LLC opposes the approval of this subdivision due to
the extremely high density of the subdivision. The subdivision
contains 178 lots and has only one ingress and egress on to State Hwy
181. This number of lots will create a very high volume o f traffic
flowing into and out of the subdivision.
Creekwood, LLC is also concerned about the tremendous amount of
water run o ff which will be created by constructing 178 residences
on this pro perty as well as the water run off which will occur as a
result of the paved surfaces within the subdivision. Creekwood, LLC
is concerned that this run off will flow on to its property thereby
damaging and depreciating its property.
Creekwood, LLC is also concerned that the view from its property
will no longer be aesthetically pleasing. The view will eventually
become a sea o f h ouses and roof tops which will eventually be located
within the subdivision.
City of Fairhope
Planning Commission
May 22, 2020
Page 2
Finally, the high density of lots will create additional
problems for Creekwood, LLC during and after the construction period,
such as construction debris and trespass on to its property.
All of the matters stated above will have an adverse effect on
the property owed by Creekwood, LLC and will likely depreciate the
value of Creekwood, LLC property. For these reasons, Creekwood, LLC
would respectfully request that approval of the subdivision be denied
or at the very least the number of lots contained in the subdivision
be reduced thereby lowering the overall density of the subdivision.
Your consideration of all of these items is greatly appreciated
by Creekwood, LLC.
GUk
Wm. Daniel Calhoun
WDC/jmt
ALABAMA HIGHWAY NO. 181 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY (PAVED ROAD)147LEGEND:SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:FLOOD CERTIFICATE:SURVEYOR'S NOTES:BAAMAL
A
MAGER
ITO VICRL.NPOINT OF BEGINNINGPOINT OF COMMENCEMENTSUBDIVISIONLAURELBROOKE25353 Friendship Road Daphne, AL 36526251.990.9950 fax 251.929-98151234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465 6667 6869707172737475 767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129 130131132134134135136137138139140141142143144145146148149151150152154153157155 156162158159160161164163166165168167173169170171172174175176W:\NATHAN\50127158 - LAURELBROOKE\PLANNING\50127158PRELIM_ALL 140s_WIDEN LAKE.dwg, 5/14/2020 3:18:37 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3L N s GRAPHIC SCALE O ~O HJ> □~-=-=---=-•--1_1 I I \ r.::-d-C C><-;. C:\I' '1-1) -\I-H1\---i Sl-\ 'vll A.SU (I IJ ll t>.IS:ll'JC A\; 1.r,;1.AJ,C: <LC::.:: rn L::LLL) l3U',I( I\J::__:; {,~__::, L::I::: A\CL 0 1"-11" P[JU'IILYI iMi!INTI llt-0" I !ME \ I I I • l1·-II" P[IUJl!IAI! U§P!IM' l0'-0" PIM[ • 1 ... -==-::::. ==--== ===--===--==== =-~ TYPICAL POADWAY SECTION N.T.S. 1. :\ I f,/F/\Sl.RFl•,1FN-:': ,,<_1FR=-\,1,\--;F I\J /-,:;C:J~l,'/,JJCS 'i/lT--J .J.S. ::-,\1\[;1\~1,'S 2. J[:.::::::l<IFT Cl~ /-,':: -urcr~ :Cl 1=□ JV :L [[\ T .3. -HERE lvl1\Y BE :C,,,EC:O~DEC ::::,~ Lll\'sECC~CED =:,EECS. EI-.SC:'v1EWS, :;,:1~H--:)F-'v'i:\vS C~ CTHER ~,~; l( . .J\IU'-S WI IC! c:_;l_l_LJ /\I LCI II L U'...:, . .J\JJ:\1(1_':i 01 ':i,\IL'. 1-'\:_ll-'LIII L~i L_ -II[ Ll,[S -,cncs=f\lHJC T = ::::c~n=?_I\[ A,NC: RC IT-::::,--,,\1.t.."S ::::,-Tl [ s-1:[[TS _l>,R= SI O'NN IOR \/ISJ.!sL 1--'J\-"USL:O C'LV 1\1\lJ w_-:L !'-IOI SU<VLV_J LI\L_':iS 1;1c111 01 \i,',AY ',1'.J\UJL~IIA l:..:'1 S f,,_sc ':ii IO'NN. :,Uk\/1-Y WA:~ C)'JLC:11-U i'I l\,1Ar:c--i .lsN) Al--'1-,'I, /[)/'(/ f,;f-C),'Ul-1) ~' 1-11-I) --JDDK :,/h A\I) 11,1 ,!'.,,[\ =--C.Clr\OhlC lJAI.£\ 1-I_C.. fi. =iFr-.Rl\:';S /,J\[; r, ST,\I\C=-s SHOWl'J HFR=-:::,\J 1:/FR=-":::m.-1•1.J-F[;" =-RCJl-..1 /-,C-,J,-', FIFI} TR:',VFRSFS : 3E/-,Rl\~S ':=HC\'il, 1-ERC:O\J 1\~E 8.\SEC· QI~ T--JE SOUTH r"RC'l'C:::;:TY LlhE /-5 3EI\JC \l'j'J"4'./';_;.'/'\l/.,St:,9"4J':JU"L. U_P.,rn,JG':o fa.Ii_ :.:\I SIA L 1--'LAhL GlilJ :..:oo<Lll\A _s ,,;LAJM,IA 'is'L::01 L'.:l~-'.1107 (l\1\1.l fi3 --;.,\TLJ\/). so, A I GPC:: ORSFRV,'.\TOI\S ·,.,.'FR=-T4-<Fl,I 1Jc:;11,1::: RF ..... I -iv=--<l'FV . .-..T:--: c-;:::ic:; :-!. -HIS 9.IRVFY :; =;t-.s=---:, l,rm~ 1•,1CfLVIFNT,~.-1:::,\J =-cw~--; I'~ 'I /-.'.";F ,\U:: i.lCFS \JC,T rl,V'O~T TO RF/, 'ITR:\:--:11"1-'JT /J~I., i'?O-LJRTni'J \,:;(TT I :-)Rl:;11'1/\ G("";\/IR'~\•111,T Sl.lR\1lv 10 FI_ITY l~FOR\'.'°'.TJh ::----j::Wh 1--ERC:::,\J :-3 A 'vlERC:: ::::=-.;EOVE CRCl_lf~[: FELD _CCA-ES A\[: AS-3ULT ~,I :..:1vv,1 ()I\ l'{U\/UL IJY C_I_\I i\ __ LIL IILS SI OLLL:, Li_ LLL:, LC.>:..::\I_J l'l(,:._:1, 1::..:, /\\JY uc;1,r; c-1 0-1 i=R ::(11,s-1dc-1:::,\I '.\/1/H,'"-:'Uf't, 11:_ _;1::::;J2 ,r;;/JF:CEL fH-·7/-li-0-Ci0,1-0 ,_;"_():JO IHI~; -"S(Jf-'l:.k v Ll:.'c \~'IIHII" .:.U\=-'';{" ( .. \JOHi1Li=-U) A,: S'.:/'.11-:: -,:-:f/ Tl I 11r:i-R/.l -,irnGlf\CY l-/1\\/\,:;,-,111,T AG=-1,Cv'.:i 1-LJJJ l\J.Olf-iA\Jl:I:. i/:,11:. l.'Af-' ()-cl.ALL1'NIN CO-.\ -v. fa.I AllAMA, I.' .4:::: \l. \-lnlR 01 '.:0.)C:)"77/'.f,1, CO\H/L\ Iv ~1Ufv'cl=-""\ '.)1'.JJU:.:, f-'A.1"~-NUl.'C=-k Oii~, S.JTIX f;I, •/f,,F ,,,11s-1, Jt;TI ;..:irc11 1,:-, ?'.:'9 _;...:/iCI-'/ i--' i / iS i OCA // /) ;,\' //// SOU iUV,~1 S .' 7//4 ()i Si Cii:'j,\' .t5, /:_j.,-V,'v',~,'/--//1---· ~-; ~,U~J/i---!, .h.'A,\'Gf:.. 2 i::./JS'/, bALUvl/i,i\;' C,'(),'_/,\.'/ y; J.LA&£.,i,!//J. Sill DAIA UI\. FT. STREETS: 8,195 LF [',UMBER OF LOTS: 176 DENSITY: 2.95 Lots/Acre SMALLEST LOT: 8,400 SF AC LARGEST LOT: 0.48 AC COMMON J\R~;\S: 12.76 1\C. TOTAL AREA: 59.72 AC. REQUIRED SETBACKS: Fl"0'1T: .',O FFFT REAR: 30 FEET SIDE: 10 FEET SIDE STREET: 20 FEET ST.£-.--JI A .Al'A.MA ,:___(__;,l_lN Y ,:_-1-l:::L'\L_:•,,";'1\1 VICINITY MAP /" = I MIL£ ',1\'I, --::1·1'/llR~Y. A IR\/ JI I IC-r\::;r-; 1r,1::JI\IIRS ,t,,'r: I ,AND c::[_11;\/-VC~S ::-:11 -.,AFI IN-Al AllAh/ A, 1--1:.---;c.1:JY :-:_;1/1 [_ IH:\ IHI:. /\1::lU\/C. 1·:; .,~. CU--<:R:::.:_:1 \/li\l' '.Jr\ I'_:\ C,1-IHI:. -(JLL:.1vv1~~c _;c_scr: l:J:::.U PF'C:=ERTY ·3Tl_l.ATC:D h ='ALD',\-'l'J CC.J\TY, ALABAl•JIA .. TO ',\'IT "Tf·c :~,c,. l"W::;'.:,1_ Quur ,er Dr J1c i'kr hwC'.o, Oum l:_;r T -j .h•:~ 1,\/c'.ol I lo I" cf I.he S-:.:, . .1 J1-:~:.1c;l ~v::.:' l_c-·A ~--12 Ncr~-,ve~-;t CJcn-~2r :::,f Sec:tic-11, Tc-\•v··,,-,-ii:J 7 Sc,,~1-·, Rcn-;e ) =-cJc;~, ·n =::,_ c:,ir· :::C-,,unty, AJ:Jbcrr,1, co·-~cJin·n(:i '.oixty ::so; ccrcc, more: or c.'.OS CTSCR p-,:,i~J cc=iwn -RJl·/1 -IAT S-ATUT:-;--:;y °'.-\'AR<A.N-v DIID RICC-::DID .t...-I\STR ,l,,il~JT 62[,f:HJ, =·~1JRATF p=-ccp--:,c;, RP.I --::'•/il\J ()JlJl,J-v, A. A.=:.Alv' ,::orvl\11 hlC:I A.I :;ou11 ',\ii :-;1 c::;~['JI I~ JI Ill '.-iOUI ',VI SI Cl,A.?11 i UI 1111 ~J(;(I I',\,' :-,1 OU/• .. R-ER OF ':;EC-ION 1 , -:::1,\'\JS-1= 7 :::c,u--1, R:\\GE .2. E/','::-, ST. STEPl--:::\S lvlER [:1/',I~ /-,In KUl,J 11--U,ICt. s::..::~IH 89"':::1'::5·• :::.i\SI. :\_::__:;\,:_; ---j=-SJJIH _li'-t. :J-SOUl-·Nt.S C~1\---i :::_---( Cl-IHt. ~,0---( -Wt.S Q~J'.,--;: :::_---(Cl-SA_) St.CIIO~J 1' A Jl'.:::IAll'..:::::. C)I-40.::::0 1-t.:::.I IC1 A :::;,/8" C.A,lll::::.u l~LJA\ (CA,-''C:•S-_S): C:J\ l~JU_ IIILI\CL SOUIII ~s·::i1'=:>G" LAS, ,A,LOf'JC IIIL ::;ou1 _I\L 01 S:Jl_.THW:::ST ()1_1,-\RTER :JF ----j::: l'-IDRTH-V:::s-:)1_,.,\=;ER c=-Sh.ID :::Tc-1mJ 11, /•, =:is-/,'J2::: OF 11.9:..:.L.5 -=-=-10 :\ -=·/'o" '._';\I' 'C.U ---iU::!:\--<: 0-1~;r.,.:,1-<1:.), IH=-\CI:. k~\ hUR H 0:,,1·=::"1.=:" 1:./'.S, 1\L,Jf,J(; TH=-'.'=,OLJ-H I INF CF TH=-·;VFST -U,.I F OF THF SOlJ-1--FA'.~T C::lJ.t..F·-F::;: OF THF \JJRTH'v1/=-'.;;T C1UF.R-ER OF SA.I[: SECTIC\J , I, A CISTA\JCE OF f,i)L.E',1 =-EET; THE'~:=::: R~l\ \:JR-I---J:=',.'6 :2.t:," IAC:,T, ,t.., (:\;--; -1 -IAST r,1-1-TI '/rST IIAII :_T --SC.UTlll,11,~,-1l,A~rR ::-;--1 -f\_,y;-1N[S-c; .. t-.~-=~ Cl SA=; S[CTIOl'-1 1-_::,, JIST.AI\JC= 01 ',J2E,~-.3 l[=T TO '/2" CA.P=T[) R[:::;-.,-;:; (CA (1.)7' L':3); Tl ['JC[ R,_.1\ IJOR-1 8~r47',y~" W[ST, ALCNG Tl I[ 'JJln I _ 1\= 01 Tl I[ \NFS----jAI =-CF THF sc::UTI--F.AST C,JA~-F~ OF THF '~:JR-HWFST CUi',RTFR OF SAi-:: s=-c-1::::,r,1 ',, P.. l,IS-A\(T c,1 66::.-7 IIIT -c A '.l/B" IC~.l,R; Tl INCi -;:;Lm l'~C-;:;T I BSf'.J4'::.J" ·/vrs-, A.I :JI\G T I ~,0--..' -LI\I:. (JI-2:..:JIH'Wl:.SI LlU1\R 1:.r"'. O--1:_ l,ICJRIH\"<1:.'.:.i ()IJ/1.Rll:.R :__::-S,\IL.l Sl:.21 C\J '1. t, lj'.-i :\\Cl-01-l)H'.cl.6'1 1--1-IC, '.>'II' '-1:i -:1-H,\K (C::\-,:::~;00-S) CN IHI-1-/\~; RIC-T-:JF-'.1V.AY C·F .!i.l P.=3,!-,fs,IA 1--c.H\'/A'•' 'W; THFl,JCF RUN ~CUTH ocn7·c:;c,·' '/._iFST, Al C)\J:::: TI--F 1:..-\SI RGH -::..::1--'Nl-.Y :J-S.1\IL'1 / •. J,3i\J//, -1:.:H',N/-,Y 1~1. UISl.-"JJCI:. JI-1JS::,0.11 1-1:.C 10 11--1:. F011,J-cw =,[(; 'J\ \G. Tr?A::-::Ol'-1-A. f\S ::c,q 72 AC-;:;[~::, 'v':JR[ :;-;:; L[:-;'.;, ,l.f\l[) -='.; I\ w:irn1 \1\'[S-C)UA.RTR OF SFC-IC+I 1', -::;,,v,Js-1::0 7 sc,lJ----j, RA\CF ; FAS-. I I IIT:Y CTITIIY -I IAT A.I I F'A<TS C!I Tl IIS SlJR\Tv Ahlll DRA.1/-.1lf',.IG A.\/1 :11\J c:c:,f,,F' -ffD I\J ACCG=iD.LJ)CE '-NITH ----j::: c . ...1=?::;:El'JT REC.J ~DE\TS OF THE 5TA,f\,DAR=::s OF ----:RACTICE Fe::;: '.::~k\/:::.Y\J'.._; Ii'-IHC. /..II:. Cl-/'-L/\l::'./'\lv'/., C IHI:. 1:L'.::I ,: __ :•I-\:IY Kl'-C'v",i_c__:,:__;:::_, li-J-1Jkl\·L\IIOf'J /\f\lL: Iii Ill [;E'1'/~ER::;:y '/ ::-;-::-;; I '.TRlvlA. S~I-<'./=-Y ~,'.JI \',A.Lil) V\'I :i,\TE P I S. f,Jc:, MAY 14, 2020 -SHEET 1 OF 1 PRELIMINARY Pl.AT NOT FOR FINAL RECORDING BOUNDARY SURVEY AND PLAT OF SUBDMSION DESIGN J.N.E. DRAWN A.E.F. CHKD. M.S.P. ENG J.N.E. SURVEYOR V.L.G. PROJ MGR M.S.P. I Dewberry· SCALE 1"=100' PROJ. N0.50127158 FILE 501271 SBPRELIM SHEET 1 OF 1
05.14.20Laurelbrooke - Fairhope, Alabama SCHEMATIC DESIGN
Page 1 of 2
Project Number: YYCODE-000
0
50
100
200N
POOL AMENITY
ENTRY FEATURE
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT 1 ILLUSTRATIVE
00 5'10'N O R T HEXISTING CONDITIONS----
pool amenityhwy 181secondary way finding
trail sign/interpretation
NOTE
"This Master Plan rendering has been prepared for general illustrative purposes only and may not be to
scale. All illustrations heron, including lot layout, streets, lakes, landscaping and future development areas
are conceptual and subject to partial or total modification or may not be developed at all. No purchaser
should rely on this master plan in making a decision to purchase property located in the "project";
Association bylaws, purchase agreement, record plat, other documentation and all matters of record must
be relied upon."
buffer
setback
pocket
park
future
access
entry
feature
6 \ ' ' "' ' ' " 5
63
' \
' ' \
9
• \------
10
~ 45
----------
' ' I
' ' I 64
44
65
' ' I
! 157
I
,
11 ,
·"" ,
I 1 ,
I ' , ,
I , ,
14 I , ,
,
,
31
-------
30
2 28
67 68 70 71
' ' I
:~: 159
I
, ,
I ,
, ,
/
,
,1·~
, ,
/
33
/ , ,
,
,
32
' '
,
/
' '
161 ~
I
160 :
I I
' ' I
' 1 3 152 ' ' ' I I
'
,
19\/
/ , ,
---
27 26 J; 25
73 74 75
I
' ' ' ' ' I I I I I I
' 164 : 165 166 167 ! 1168 169 170 : 171 172 I I I
' I
I
------------:
127 120 1 ~~
' ' ___ _[ ___
117
149 ------------
123 1~
-----~--
148 --------115
124
,
:\~ /,, ,
-1 x 113
,,1· ~ t)~,I: --------
112 I I ,
. L-, -------, ,
I I , I 111 ,
1 I , ,
I
138
131
77 78
I
' ' I
173 174 :
I 175
102
103
--~---
104
105
108
---
133 1 4
\
' I
: 176
I 177
l
/
101
100
99
--------
0 98 ---------
96 I I
-------
95
--------
94
--------'
93
--------
92
91
90
),
87
landscape architects
05.14.20Laurelbrooke - Fairhope, Alabama SCHEMATIC DESIGN
Page 2 of 2
Project Number: YYCODE-000
POOL AMENITY VIEWSI I
l andscape arch itects
1 SD 20.25 Mars Hill Subdivsion June 1, 2020
Planning Commission
June 1, 2020
Subdivision Approval
Case: SD 20.25 Mars Hill Subdivision
Project Name:
Mars Hill Subdivision
Site Data:
Lots – 3
Acreage -
Project Type:
Minor Subdivision
Jurisdiction:
Fairhope Planning Jurisdiction
Zoning District:
Unzoned Baldwin County within
County Planning District 17
PPIN Number:
235003
General Location:
Northeast intersection of CR32
and US Hwy 98 (Greeno Road)
Engineer of Record:
Dewberry Engineers
Owner / Developer:
CFP Housing, LLC
School District:
Fairhope Elementary,
Intermediate, Middle, and High
Schools
Recommendation:
Denial
Prepared by:
J. Buford King Development Services Manager
l
N
PPIN 235003
l
N
2 SD 20.25 Mars Hill Subdivsion June 1, 2020
Summary of Request:
Public hearing to consider the request of surveyor of record Mr. Steven Pumphrey and engineer of record
Mr. Jason Estes, PE of Dewberry Engineers on behalf of Curtis F. Pilot of CFP Housing, LLC for the approval of
Mars Hill Subdivision, a three-lot minor subdivision. Subject property is located on the east side of US HWY
98 (Greeno Road) near the intersection of County Road 32, north of the H.L. “Sonny” Callahan Airport.
Proposed Lot 1 is 5.35 acres +/-, proposed Lot 2 is 15.38 acres +/- and proposed Lot 3 is 6.57 acres +/-. A
private ROW to be named “Mars Hill Lane” is also requested as a component of the subdivision request. No
development activities are known at this time above and beyond the creation of requested lots via minor
subdivision.
Comments:
• Article V, Section E.3.a. Lot Standards – Lot Access
a. Proposed Lot 1 does not front upon a paved, publicly-maintained street
b. A waiver has been requested to allow proposed Lot 1 as submitted
• Article IV, Section C.1.c. Street Plan Requirements
a. Proposed “Mars Hill Lane” is neither a “lot” conforming to any lot standard contemplated by the City
of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations, nor has any information been submitted indicating that the
existing driveway was constructed to, or will be improved to a public standard for which it may be
dedicated to and accepted for maintenance by the City of Fairhope or Baldwin County at a future
time.
b. A wavier has been requested to allow proposed “Mars Hill Lane” to be platted as private ROW in its
current form and condition.
• Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks
a. No sidewalks along US HWY 98/Greeno Road and County Road 32 are provided in subject application
or proposed within pedestrian/sidewalk easements
b. A waiver from all sidewalk requirements has been requested
• Article IV, Section C.1.b.(13) and Article V, Section D.5.a.(9) Tree Protection Plan
a. The applicant indicates no development activities above and beyond the creation of proposed lots is
known for the site at the time of consideration and thus no tree protection is required
• Article IV, Section C.1.h. Traffic Data and Traffic Study:
a. The engineer of record (EOR) has provided correspondence indicating the proposed subdivision does
not trigger a traffic study
• Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(17) Maintenance Plan for maintenance of detention facilities
a. Two existing detention ponds provide stormwater storage and treatment for the site and to continue
to accommodate drainage needs for the entire site after the creation of multiple lots, a blanket
drainage easement is noted on the plat on the entirety of the property.
b. An Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement will be necessary for the detention
ponds and the stormwater system in order to meet the current requirements of the subdivision
regulations should the subdivision receive approval.
The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article V.B.2. “Approval Standards”. Each of these
criteria is addressed below with either a “meets” or “does not meet” comment. If any of the criteria is not
met, a denial will be recommended.
2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the
subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and
development as proposed, due to any of the following:
3 SD 20.25 Mars Hill Subdivsion June 1, 2020
a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s
Zoning ordinance, where applicable.
• N/A – subject property is located in unzoned Baldwin County. The 2015 comprehensive plan
contemplates a commercial node near subject property, however subject application does not
present any development activities above and beyond the creation of proposed lots.
b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or
program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a
Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program.
• N/A - subject application does not present any development activities above and beyond the
creation of proposed lots for which analysis by the plans described above is triggered.
c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these regulations.
• Does not meet – Proposed Lot 1 does not meet the lot standards requirement (waiver submitted)
and the proposed private ROW meets neither lot standards nor ROW standards (waiver submitted).
d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and
regulations; or
• meets
e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the
planning jurisdiction of the City.”
• Does not appear to endanger health, safety, welfare or property
Enlarged Zoning Map:
l
N
<4..1Ui'IV Road 32
SUBJECT PROPERY
PPIN 235003
M"1 -Ll g l'l1 ln<luo1rl.>I Di •lriol
4 SD 20.25 Mars Hill Subdivsion June 1, 2020
Enlarged Aerial Map:
Recommendation:
Staff has several concerns about case number SD 20.25 because of the nonconformities requested and
submission of waivers in lieu of making corrections to the application to correct nonconformities. It appears
the site is of sufficient size and frontage that three lots may be created without any waivers and without
creation of any nonconformities. As submitted, proposed Lot 1 does not front upon a paved, publicly-
maintained street. Further, the proposed Mars Hill Lane meets neither lot standards nor ROW standards. No
information was provided indicating if the existing driveway were designed and installed to a public ROW
standard that would allow it to be dedicated to the City of Fairhope or Baldwin County at a future time, thus
not qualifying as a private ROW in the interim. It is possible that proposed Mars Hill Lane may be improved
to a public standard, but a more robust development application indicating needed improvements to the
driveway was not included as case number SD 20.25 is a requested minor subdivision. Staff fears that future
redevelopment/subdivision of the property will require additional waivers to utilize the private ROW for
access, creating a cascading effect of nonconformity and wavier requests. As a result, staff recommends
DENIAL of case number SD 20.25 for the following reasons:
1. Proposed Lot 1 fails to comply with Article V, Section E.3.a. Lot Standards – Lot Access
a. Proposed Lot 1 does not front upon a paved, publicly-maintained street
b. A wavier from this requirement has been requested
l
N
5 SD 20.25 Mars Hill Subdivsion June 1, 2020
2. Proposed “Mars Hill Lane” fails to comply with Article V, Section E.3 Lot Standards or with Article IV,
Section C.1.c. Street Plan Requirements
a. As proposed, Mars Hill Lane meets the standards of neither a “lot” nor a right-of-way (ROW).
b. A wavier from this requirement has been requested to allow the private ROW to be platted as
submitted.
3. No sidewalks are contemplated by the application as required by Article VI, Section D. Construction
Standards-Sidewalks
a. Staff does not necessarily object to a request for a partial sidewalk waiver as the ROWs on
which the property fronts are more than one road mile from the nearest sidewalk and a
pedestrian/sidewalk easement could be placed upon the plat.
b. A wavier from all sidewalk requirements was submitted.
Staff does not object to tabling the application to a future planning commission meeting to allow further
study. If it is the pleasure of the Planning Commission to APPROVE case number SD 20.25, staff requests the
following conditions of approval:
1. A preliminary plat is granted in lieu of the concurrent preliminary/final plat approval typically granted
to requesters of a minor subdivision.
a. The purpose of the preliminary plat approval is to allow the necessary improvements to Mars
Hill Lane to attain a public ROW standard.
b. If required by the Planning Commission in lieu of granting a wavier, installation of sidewalks
along Greeno Road and CR32.
2. Preparation and submission of a Stormwater Operations Maintenance Plan and Agreement for the
existing stormwater system on subject property.
3. The Planning Commission may wish to make a ruling on Article V.B.2.e. regarding health, safety,
welfare, or property. Condition “3” serves as a placeholder if that ruling is desired.
SITELEGEND:O
L
D
O
R
C
H
A
R
D
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
U.S. HIGHWAY 98 (A.K.A. GREENO RD) 225' RIGHT-OF-WAY
BALDWIN COUNTY HIGHWAY 32 80' RIGHT-OF-WAYBAAMAL
A
MAGER
ITO VICRL.N LOT 7LOT 8LOT 9LOT 10LOT 11LOT 12COMMON AREA NO.1DETENTION POND DETENTION POND POINT OF BEGINNING132SUBDIVISIONMARS HILL25353 Friendship Road Daphne, AL 36526251.990.9950 fax 251.929-9815W:\50120268\PLN\50120268_MINOR SUBDV.dwg, 5/19/2020 8:17:59 AM, DWG To PDF.pc3N CERT/FICA TE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES: --E l,\:::::.3Ic\C:C, AS Al T-o:;, ZEC EY F.AIRHOP:: F~3LIC UTIL -E'3 -EF:E3" A.P=>R:J',/E.3 I 'Nlllll'J --'li\l I '.)Ii I :;:;,l?l:ING 01 '.i/,f/ IN 1111 --'IWl::t, '.) :;1 0 !,',1I;',\H..J c:::,JI..JF, A_A8/>.'vl.-S, THIS DAY c,=-2::: I I I I I I I I / -,-CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE E-911 ADDRESSING: --ff _\=·:::;,sc\JC:J A3 ;,,_ ---,::::;,IzEc EY Bf'LJ'i'n, c=-,J\J-v E-011 3C,1,RC --j[:;>EBY t,'l'iJvL:i _ l,:Jt,J \J..',~'-5 t•.:i U_l'C L~ '.:·\J II_ 'NII II~1 'L.'\I /-,NU I LLJ" A=>p:;_JvES --:: 'N-H\ =-_;,,T FOF: -H:: R::cc=m~c o=-SM/E lr..J -HE :CROEJ.-::=: C I ICL :.;, J,\L_:i,H..J COUN Y, i'.L.'1J..',f/;\, 15 U,\Y 01 , 20 AJTHCRIL:_=: SILlJA LR:_ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY TELEPHONE (AT&T): THE u~mERSICI..JED, AS ,A,IJTHCR z::::: BY ;,.,-';,.--:RC3" AP=>R1.J\iC:S Tf-E \'/ THI\ PLA.-=-::::;, 1111 l~IC'.Jill\J'.; ,:;1 '.)1\1.11 11,1 HCll,\II ,:)IIIC ,:;i 13'• IJW\ CJ.,\lv, /,I..',ll/\lvlt,, THIS JAY :::.1=-.AUTHOR ZED REP:;,ESErHATI 125' HIGHWAY CON TRUCTION SETBACK GRAI'IIIC SCALE 4:J ( I '..J f 1:.1:_ 1 n~h = fl'.l f: Ar: -AIR C:OhJD TIC)NIR L =-L=-C I kl(:: ~r:x IEBI --1 -CTRIC 7R-A.<IR ncx Im -=-L=-':_: I klC '.JU I _c_ E·A :::L:::CTRIC VIE-ER tJ -=-IRF HY8Rtd\ T JJ =-IRE l-'RCFE2T C\ V'tLVE TFI Fl+-O~JF r=-r:Ts-,t.,I co 2..2.X . ..'.:.2. \-1:.;-:i:JUNU IC.Lll'-:J\l C::D -Jf-.::\I\J1\Gl l•,11\~JHOLl G\I :(x --c-0 '\l -FO.t. :.c;.t,S I'./ U U-'. :.;uv 'NHl c,II-=>011 5 CN s:::v',,iER ::LE/ 1,1-:J~ T ::::;=-\1\1FR 'v1Al,JHC)I F .FUTY FOL[ J UIY 1.,,]/\k.S::U\ ::-Ic:c_-: Cl'IIC) J-I_ITY MAR<[R :c.A.S _ I\=) .FUTY 5TU8 DU-~::-;C1\'V"=--~) 'il'/,.-ER lv':::TE::;: n,11 7 -:=rn~Ci~[T= k-1Cl'Jl_ll•/[\r -our--.m I\ PLA.c:= CTI-@ ::R f/lP TC,P -::er~ P \J IC::" \j l~J Pl ACI 1(111 £, )n:;I I? U IAI\J ;rn,J I '.LI\) l'J 'I AU CRf-(J, -::A.Pf--'U) RU,J Pl~, f-J~\_:; er;:..;• : r) CHf-' HD'E cCP -s-s-s--JII-FII-FII--'.':Al C, .4TID 71AR \0 AI\ID JIS-,~.\21 ::::0ImucA ILL) \1L P,_ -'If-'_ :::::ORRUC1\TED ----,L,'\STIC -,I'"=--~[I\JiC,PC[D cm,C"CT A --::c:I -~il'JIGRC:Tl,I (;C'k.r:-rT :::Ip1 ~LCJIW ..::LLJ l3U•. ~l~,IC A\:J :;:::v\'ER _ \E 1/c~::E VVATR LIi~[ :::Ip[ _/ v.u.~00 I II•/ rr:ciP.RI\IRSI l!Cl 1-'0 L_:,,;;._1',l:.k 1J:cl FOlt,-f;I IAR Al .'if."lf-4 1-'A+:.:l:.L .:.-b C·L U4 L ·JC·· UC·:l.UC·J :=nY :T IA R I:::=-c 'D BOX 42·,i IA R I::;=i[, AL ~-!"533 r'J., CEL 56-C•2-04-2-C,J'-DC·4.DC·J BALDWIN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION CERT/FICA TE OF THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR ;\::;CCf-il) \C IC ~LD-J-'-,'b('), I-S )IVS '.J\ ::;,-JNL.:· IS t.Xt.'~I' HOM IH:. A ARAlvlA DFP.'\F'-\ff'H C)F =i1'1R Ic: HF;, TH F'lll =-s RFCA:;:-1Iw; R .. I DI\C __:t.•Jc.L'.J'Mt.NI. f-=-SIGl~.\IUkt. Nf-lXt.__: --1=-kt.C-~I Y:-C.'::; NO If/ 'LY t,,J ,\'l'f-iC·V1\L =-:-p A\lv FX STIN\~ r_:F. =-.. LCeF ,~,Nc;ITF '',FWA'.":F TF'FATl·.F\ T SY::;TFf/ T-·:, THF , 7C T-:: =iIµ--/>.:O RFF~I c;l.RVITTFf, -o AI\I. f;'.)Nc;!D=-F,:'=-1; CJ" Tf-F r;TY CllflHJI\C c:.:,t,11v' ss UN O I /,,Iii IC-'L. ,\L;\_;,\-.1:\, ;\\__: C, ,\-'f-'l!CVLl} uv SJ'..:II ,::;c~•IVISSICN L:Y:===c--________ J,\IL _________ _ ',FC'-SFTARY Tl I[ l_lNCUi::'IGl\[D, 1\3 DIR[<-:'.-:J( 01 Tl I= J.-\LC1/;l~I COI.INTY =iL;\I\ \ I\G 1\\~ LCl\I1\IG l):_l·/1,--(ltil:.I\, 71:.--il:.:iY .",I· 'CW\il:.:· IHI:. ;'/II1-l~J l'LAI rc:k IHI:. f-11::,...:0kJl'J:3 er ':if\.\11:. 1\1 TII[ pr:,::;,Jt,T[ :JTIC[ 01 J \L~l',IN COl.'IFY 1\L/,Jt,'✓•\ Tl IIS -= Jr,v :JI _____ _ CERT/FICA TE OF APPROVAL BY RIVIERA UTILITIES (ELECTRIC): T-=-l.u-:=-:::sIr;\=-r-:,, A', ALJT-OR 7FD RY :;:IvIFR/I -.T -Fs H=-c;=-::;v ;,,:o=ipovFs -f-F ',\1-HI\ f-_;,I f-Ok H:_ R:_C::.:•~L·,ING m '.::A~lt. l~J IHt. -'f-/Ct'J, =-Of-f-C:_ Of tiA_Li'.','I\J :.:cu~JIY, A -"R.b.fAA, THI', ___ l.•AY C:F _______ 7C \ \ I I \ I RCBER-S cC:'sRY W PC [OX 39::. FA "---1:Jr'E. b.L :::,~,C:33 FL ODD CER TIF/CA TE: -HS FRCP"=--F!TY _ ES 'i'.il-f-I\ ZC\E ";(' ,'.Jl\'.;;f-/-._'t_U) .1\'.;; SC!\LUJ -";Cf/ I7l l[:[RAL =~[R~=NCY 1/A\AC[M=I\T :\G:::\CY'S FLC:J[; NSUR,-\\CE F,1\-E 'vl1\P l'.A r:J·1\11i~ C:CLI\TY, Al Alll'J.,,1.1,., \1.AI' I\J\'lnl--;; u1c::.;..:,c,J;::;,/\~ ::..:UMlv1~1\ IY ~JUH::=-R D15:::::o, =,/\r--.lEL ~1Ulv18EF; ,_,1:--1,:, :.~._,FFIX ''ii, I \ F1\~C[L '6-C3-::3-C-OCC-::ro.:x2 HAI' Rl\!ISlr:J --:: . ..-,,T PrR FiTI I. /C:·'J. \ \ \ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER IIIL v\..:LS:OS-''-J_J, l\':i ::;r:utJIY LI\G~._LIS GI L_;;\_UW\ :..,:JJ'~lv, f,_1\U,".l,l/1. llll(LUY t.=iFR'.,VFS ---1=-WI-HI\J ~IAT FOF; ---1=-F;=-f::~,Cel.·INf: OF :",,'.;f/F l~I T--IF =ipc';R/\T OF=-c-.~ :_:, l3,\LL.;1'ilN COL~. IY, 1\L/d/,f//\. J,'-ILlJ III':i L.:f,v Cl ________ _ :.:CUN I Y _\ G '..J_Lli I I 3 _..,Good Samaritan Church 29 32 --------, " PCJINT CLEAR POL□ • • 28 5 CLUB • VICINITY MAP 1" = 1 MILE 27 " ,---.. ) CERT/FICA TION OF OWNERSHIP AND OED/CATION: --,is IS -:::i CErFY THA----------AS--------:T c1=i I OUSIW'.. _ L :::: . -1 [ O'v\11\[R :JI T [ _.i\D SI O',\'I\ t,J.D D[SCRIO[::: IN Tl [ -::_;..-, i\'.i C/·,I_J';I) 1111 St•.\·I I'.:, Ill :ill(VIYII! /•.~Ill :ilJl)VII; I) N) l'Jl:ICi",II; Ill !IC~I. !() S -=-RF::;v /,(,(I\OWI =-nGF i\1\1., /,,:o--:-TH=-S/1f;=-.. \JrlFR --F ~,=-sIG\J t-.\JI.' T-F HFR=-r;~J H:,Ic.t,rD, /•.~n rXDIC,'.T:":, 1\II 11\:,-1,rr,T:, 1,::,-1 TIii l'Ulff'C:;r-:, II--,-I\J :;-T -;J1,-I, :JGl:.I-U"'( Wll--i '.::i~C-kl:.'.::il"S::.: CNCO f,\C ,:_:<..:Vl:.~J/,JJl'.::i ~J::_:, :_U H:_kl:.I\ ,_;f-1 /•II/ICHU 1~1 1-.~f 't>.kAlf--t;AI IJ;;:J"s.1--'JI '!<IN I_~· ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTARY PUBLIC: COUNTY CF I Al,J[, ST_,.-:: HEc;;C:B'i 1:::ERTIFY -f--/>T '.ii CIP rnI~;ir,1r: IC AS C1','r..JII-: h 'ilJlh:-:I1II) '.l Ill f;-RTl-f:ATIC:•'. f;I OWt,IRSIII' AN[) 1.T,lf:ATl1\, ll,''IA,;-r:i lT0RI t,r T IIS 1.·AY l~I P=RSON -'•,\D 1\C.(~JJW_=cc[ -,"IT I=/SII[ S::::\CD, S[,\_=c ;'J1:'; D[Ll\'[R[C ocrns= f,'[ II'.i ;,\"I~.-' -::oc:,\, S.',.I) \JS iU,1 NI,\ 11 IS I 1\NI) ·/CllJ\ :\Id ,',Cl :JI! 1111 uscc; ,\NI! =·,Jkl'CSf-C; IHf-Rf-I~. S-I f-:h H. NCT,\~Y PU=-_:::: CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 Cl 25.00' 31.06' S55"12'43"W 29.10' 155.00 128. 79 S43"25 40 W 125.11 20.00' 23.47' S33'36 55"W 22.14 70.00' 110.34" N45"09"33"E 99.27" 10.00' 15. 76' S45"09' 33"W 14.18' 80.00' 93.87' N33"36"55"E 88.58" 95.00' 111.47' N33"36'55"E 105.19' SITE D/1.T A LON INC: UNLOt--llU tlAI_L::WII\J COUN I Y PROPOSED USE: COfAMERCIAL UN. FT. I\J UMBER STREETS: 1,462 LF OF LOTS: 3 SMALLES-LOT: 5.35 AC LARGEST LOT: 15.38 t,C TOTAL AREA: 29.39 AC. REQUIRED SETBACKS: FICsO\JT: 30 FEET l"EET REAR: SIDE: SIDE 30 10 fll:.I STREET: 20 FEET SERVICE: CITY OF FAIR--IO"E SEWER SERVICE: C TY OF l"A.IRHOP~ ELECTl=.:IC SERVICE: RIVIERA UTILITIES TELEPHCNE S~RVICE: AT&T GENERAL NOTES: I1-1:.f-c:_ l:i U:_J'.,',All:.l) Hl:.kl::i/I --i A 7::i C'.YJI (/.~ CCCI 1:.,:,c;H :iJI:.) J llllv F.i>,'.:;=-f,1FI\IT .'.;I:)\( !J, I '.',IJF ,:JT I ll~FS /\W) ':',. Al '.";\I'."; THF CeFP,R I CF INF:, --lt.-<t. I',;, __:t.JIC:\l:_U 1-t.f-i=-'s',' 1--1 t, :'.'.L:\t,Kt. U L Iv t..-',Cdvlt.\JI '..:•VU\ I-=-t.Nllkt.lY OF --=-FCl'.";=iFR-Y :)-:J'.'/1-.1 HF"IF'.°;'J --1I'.::i -'k'.)-'t.-<IY _lt.:C: i/II1-IN lf-t. t,Hl-'O-< '.,IVt.f-/_1\Y 1\J,L.; :C:H.-\LL f-•:)LL(_:.1/, IHt. p=-01JIR=-t,1FIHS o,n I\JFD lrJ ---1=-;;i-y CF FAIF'f-:):O~'s :'C~lI1-.IC f:RD '.t.,\(F, ART(; F C'.";\ITCIJR:, Sf-OW'J H~=:F:J'j /\RF =-:;:,:w T-=-F./\ DW\J C'.":·lJN-r f:F:JCR,,'.;P-IC INI Ols'.'1\I C~. ':iY:OILV. ~ ---IF 1.,=--=-\TO\ F:-J'.';:', ft s-•'.":·Rf/W,,'.;TFF' FAC I-IF:O cr..J '>TF c;=-p•)F FCR C,Tr:Rl,,i\';A-FF; 1,1/.N/,,:;U,IL \ I I C,ls ,\LL ,'.; LC IC, ,\~IU 'i1IL_ JL fl /\IN I i\lNLl) L!Y :\ f-'IWI-' _Is Iv 0'.'l'NL (':i /\'.','.',0•'.":IATl'.";\J Ar..JY =-.. L:;:F DFvFIOPt)=-tJ-WT-'. ---1:, c:;_,=,-)l',''.:;:-1\ WIii "F~J .. "F /\ NLW l)ls,-\IN,\G_ S IJJY l'.J J_ L iMINL II IL ~IL_J I C·ll LX-·t,\IUl'..J:; II IL :; '.) if/\'.'/, IL S s F/\l": ITIFS. IL SL 1:0 __:LJIC1\ I _U I Lli_W I I .', __:1c/'dN1\GL Lt,S_h•IL \ I U'ill\ 11 _ L~J III'.L I Y '..l Ill p=ecp=-FT" :OHCl'.W..J HFRFCr..J IL lvlll,Jll,1UM I ~-I:i _j I LCCli _L_\1,\IIUr-.1 :__:N /,LL _Ul:O ~II:\LL UL 1/::!" /,.JCJV_ II L HIC-C:ST ELEv'A-ION A.T BJ _DII\C F:J:JPRINT SURVEYOR: DEWBERRY 25353 FRIENDSHIP ROAD DAPHNE, AL 36526 VICTOR L GERMAIN, PLS UC. NO. 38473 OWNER: CFP HOUSING, L.L.C. P.O. BOX 91206 MOB/LE, AL 36691 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: PHCF·ERT'{ .'S LGCA TED //v' Tf,'E ~~oun-ntEST i/4 OF SECT/Ot\i ,U, iOV,:;",•~·i-iii; 6 s,:__;.-_/,i,h' ,Y/,i./Gt 2 C/1S/_ &/,LUV::1tv· CCXi.'\"i(, /,i_/,b/\M/1 1. .A.LL H[.4'.'::,LJr-Cl\:l[I\JE 1,\1[1'·= (,,-IA[)= I\J ACC'.J~[)A\:T 1N Tl I ~ .. S, ·s-A \[;A,RDS. ). nFSCRll'Tlc:,1,1 ,c.,s FL,R''-J SHF--:: RV C =-\ T. J, -=--<l Vi'-,v :::'l R=-C()kJU) C)R l_ll~•:c_::..JA-:L;u_:, _:c_c_us, c_/\SCHl\ IS, ,;I~:H Cf-','v/\Y~, OR c:,-[R IW:-RLHvC\ TS \1.'I I Cl I CC,_J_=;, A.ll[C-T 1= ]OUf\JDP,--;:l[S Cl SA. D p·~c:,p=~-[S, 4. --=-I \JFS RF--=:::FSFl'J-I\C THF c=-~,TF~ ~,F ;,,r,rn ~Ic---n-:::i=--1/.' . .'\Y3 :::i=--HF s-RFFF ,L,R=-Sf-(J',/,N HJR \/I'.:;IJ,'\L P~-d..JC<,;;c_s Cl,JLY /',.NU 'i'.'lf-s.:l \~ll SUf-f/=-vc__:;, l_,h,LlS'.:'. '\IGf-I J-\-\1.1\Y HC\Jl., \/[~J-,t.,TICN IS AL'.-:30 ~;II0\VN. SL,R\IFY \'/,!:.,?; C:J\8UCTFr:J II\ l'-,1ARC:H Af\lD ,A.l'RII, /07=:; ~=-ccR8Fi) \J FI=-I--:: RC::>< 3?:! i•l,JU lh :\~J C.Lc.r: lf-s.:J\ C U1\ Ii\ -LC 6. [l[_P,Rll,JC'.:: ,t.,\j) UIS ,A.1'-JCC.S SHCW\J -=-RlC\J 'i'ilR=-"c::.::\/I',.J IUJ" r--;:c,r...1 ACIJ,6._ f-ll:_Ll.) -=;; i\ \/ER'.':-E'.':; 7. lllARlt~G:: SI I0'.'i\ I IR-0',I A.RI nt..s-r: ()N Tl II SOUT =p:J=iRTY I I\Ji ,AS 1111\0 ~W9'49'5J"',,'{~S19"4S'59"F. RF.2-.Rl'J'."";S A.RF O\J ST.2-.T =1 ,l.NF c;:;oIn '.":OCR--::I1,J.A-=-s A.I A,=3Al•,,1,ti. \'/ES-Z'.)\=._ ()1[12 (\A.=: 03 J,LT._.i-,11; ,-.,. Al I C: ··s ::: !SI l(•/.A ,y~:-; ,,.vI I< 1.4<1 \J USl~,C: ?I Al l'-,-1I K \ \-'IA ,:: Cl") ·~. -S SUR'-/=-Y S :::'.1\SUJ ~POI\ l·v1U~Jl•,1UJl,t..llDN f-'.JUW I\ ---'L/'·.C=-,\\_:; lJJ=-S \01 pu::;;p=:F'T -c, BE A RE-:::;,ti.C:D,1ENT i'..f\lD F·Rc=·'.JR-I'.Jl\lr--.lG =:=---=--OF; ::;Ir,P.L c=:VER\(JEl'H SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: Sl!--.I_ '.:,1 AL.A.lJAV.A. courrY c=-B:\_DWII\J V'.'L, ULV,'J_I,mv, .A. I tl\,1 J LIC_\5 _ _:;, L'JC l'-J_Ll6 A'JL:: L/..J,IJ SUl(-/_'·'Ol~S O l.),i:.,-'II1,JL, /,_1\3/\l,;lh, f---ER:::BY ST/',E THh-T-E .'\BC\/E IS CORR::::~--Vl1\I' '.)~ l'_:'-.T OF THE =-0LL0'·1\'l~Jc; --:,FSC:R RFn :::>p:)::OFRTY SITl_A-FD I\ Fl.Al 1,11,\ill\ C0l,l'-JTY, _:,, A7P.\.•I.A, TO '.1\/I-: "[:J Tr'1:· :i 111: ?,rn,.hv::!-d c c·rwr .. r C,c:c:.i:J· :ii::'i, T:Jw-1,-; .. ir: 6 S:HJlh, Rr 11(_;(: ? 11::;, SI Ste:=:he·rs \1le-ic·c11, anc r~r ~he·:=:e \cdh C.S ,-=eqrees '=11 mirrvtes last. a enc; the ,:;o~ti-~crgir o" saij Secir .33, c di2tarce o" ~.1::4_33 fee~ -=er c Pei-~ o-= Ee,;iirning; hence :·cr,li-,. 1,Jrn. ~n d:,sr1:c:-; :":-' "'i11ulc•, -,i•;l, f,'.';4_?,':, fc:::1, l·i,::r-::c: ·urr Nc·l·1 n:-; :kc_r::('·' :-;:;. ~·rute::: ';\1est. l.U:i.lb tee~ to arr i"on pi7 r1cr<w: the-ce r·un ,Jo·~h d:0 ceq•2es '=:1 r1·nu~es :=:cs~, 3C:A.2 -=ecct tc a~ ·ror :=i-n marker; ti-ence rL~ f'.orti-[,Q de,;re2s 05 77inutes 1i',1ec;:t, 1:17'.0:J "c:::I; lhcr-c:c rw, ',:J1,l !"";c) d::1_;r::c::-; :;,L 1r1ir,1,.c:-; 1.1/c-, 1C'.,f;7_7 ":,1:l (J ·i11 ·rln p"11 ~ckec: ~7eree cun South :_:u de::::rees U.5 r, nutes =-cs~, LU\j, /1 tee~ ~o c11 i•o~ i=:·n Ta·k2r, ~i-enc2 r ~7 South 89 ceg·2es 54 TirL ~e2 'Nest, 2.c:_9 33 -=eet ~c ::i poirt er he 'hest mar:;:"n :,ui:I S;;,:·li:n :'i."';; -,::11c;' r __ r· S-:iJlh r:,,:-; d-::(_J·•::c'i C)4 ·,i-1Jl::i, lu•;l, )4' 7:J rc::l· 11,c·i-::c 11H \J:J"th OS:! deqcees jj 1,n~tes las~, t__;/_i_,.\j teet to a-irt=:i-:Ji7 mcr..::er c·r ~-e last -·,::ir,-=i7 c:-= Greeno R,-:-,cd; thence ru-Scu~r iJ:= ::J2g'ees C·9 Trir~~es 28 secor,-=s E,::ist CC·.7C1 feet tc, ··1 1c-1:i11 rr u'-:.u o .. 1·1, .. -:l'i T::1(_Ji'1 :,I '.";r(:-::rr:: R,:ud; I· ;;r1c::: r,_-1 l\mlf ~.~ dcc_;rc:::; :)4 ~·rute::: -= c:e,-=e-,::Js lcs~, LUd.i_,.\j teet to a-·re1-cin mcr-:.er: t7e7ce rvr \orth UU ce:::irees 12 1inutes 1/l/2st, C:,.::C,6 "eet t::: a c-o-nt in ~f-e cente' of en existi~:;: crai-c<;e ditch; ~f-ence 'm Sc>1Jll,c-:1:;l,x:Hdy ··1r· SrnJlh•,1,(l·:Jly, ;il,::,111_; (l' :J ":JI Dv,"r,(_J -,:: cd1lcr ol :,,::·d :lr1_:·11c(_Jc: c:ilc: .. ~i-e tolle·1vi-,:::i coL·ses: S:J,rr' L.d ::J2qrees .:;-r1·nutes lcs~, 0'1 S:!1 t2e~; So~ ~7 L1 ,-=e:rees .Jj ~·1ute2 :=:::is~, L5.1C f2e~; Se.r-1E, ceqrees 56 r-irutes Eas~, 2=:2.24 feet; Scuh L2 :·:·c_;rc:c:•; ~-,,7 rr i· ,,.·;:; lcii,I, ?71:'i "c::I; S,::-1Jll1 :;:.:; c:c;J1c::; 77 T·r11Jlc::; -:::;., 1f;/ T:, :·,· ~i-enc2 r ~7 South 0=1 ceq•ees LL TirL ~e::: / d secc,nd::: '1'/est, lil Ub teet to :J7 ·1-c-pin ~crke", the7ce rLr Sc:-~-75 jegress 46 min-tes .32 s2co~cs 1/1/es~, 1':',7.19 foe~ to en l'c,n .. i11 1m:r-:.::1· h::·1,::c I r· ~c F',C; d::(_Jt ::,·-, 7' ····111Jlc:•; :,;,:) :;c::c:-r1d•, \1/:,:-;l, ?1 CJ? lc:::I le.> m, ir,-=,n :Ji~ r1cr-\er: the-ce run ':-.:e-Jt-:_:c dec;re2:: Ui m·m.tes L1 s2cc,1Es lad. L::,O . ..'.:tl te8~ ~o ~i-e Poi7t ,-=:f Be:;:·nnirg. -,cct ies ir ~~e Sou~h1.•,es~ cu,::ir~er c" the Sor~ tr east q-•::irte· ·n S(;,::lic-),"';_ Tc:wr·:;h·:, ::::, c:-" ·, li:Tc_;c: 7 1::,-;., rl:1 ::w·11 C:Ju1ly A. ,::l:rnrl(l, c::; :-;hO'Mr hy SL"Jey cr·ei=:nec by rc·ri-cipe I tie & :.:_:1_.rve,; '...:empa~y, rc., cated ~lan-Ja"i 1=·· 1·~1·::1,: v·,cra2I .\rnck, '.::L..·,.:eyci1-." :'.CESCR --=1 D\ ccr-: ED FRClv' =-I~ST .Ai'.ERICJ.,\ Tl-LE I1,JSIJRM~CE CC\-T'.Al~v-l'OLICv 1,J:=:. -.A.-5C1' 400-' 3693'31 c, =:.:,,-=o 5[PT[lv1[TR 22. 2c,17 .AT 1: 52 P J,1.) ::_;,:_:,1,._,11·./=-~,,:_:c_ /-.I 17=-':,'.__;~IH\'i=-~I C..::khlk 0-SlCIICN ...:i.J, 01:'>'I\JSHII' j ::.:c,u H, ";1\''-J'._:t_ L =-/'.,':-.:1 ':-_;I '.:_; =-'HU,JS M=---S:lll:\\J 1\\JL; --?IJ\J 7=-\'._:c_ SOU -~9''19':ig" t:_1\SI, 1\UJI\::; lf-l SJ~ 7 V A.RG N OF :-CA-;, :~;FC:T CJN :cs.'i, A 1:, :~TM,ICF :--:,=-.""'.,f:4.,)7 FF=-T -:7 A. P(;l'H; CC'HINlJF THFNc=-'.":,CJ IH t.i9''19'::i9" l/\SI, i\LC.X,IG IHC ':::Ou -r-U,R'.;l~J Cf-S/..l.) '.:::lCIICN Jj, 1\ ..::isl,\\JC[_ C,f-[.04.' 9 f-U:_ IC ,4 i,::)11,J ; I Hl:_f,JC=-R,...J\J \J::__i-;: f---::_;::.;,"Lj' Jc'· =-A'::, I, /:., DIS P,'<t_ 40.00 f-=-=-I 0 A 1 /2." ::.:AJ'f-'Ll.) l<_JAI\ ::1 Al \I IJ-'L) 0'J I I IL r,J0Ii 11 \IC 11-0 -1/\'.A,Y 01 J.A.Ll)\'i \ ::.:our,J I Y IC-IIW.6,v J2 ,,:,,_Nl) IIIL -·Jt,I '-' lLCIN[,J'~::__'.: '.:,Ol,J \~_ I IL''-J'..:L [,JJl~III CD"l_j.j1]'' _A,5I, .6, :,I~JIAl'H:I ,::•I //[·J'j 11 IC /J,. 1 "CA.-+' I~ I< !Al~ ( #':16/:J\ 1111 \J':· ILi\ :;C,JIII ?,'.!"Lf;':JG" -A:',T, A. f;IS-A.\'.T 01 ~54.?? 1--T TO A '/?" CA::OPII_: R-lAR :'.IA.IRI I::--;::i-\ Tl IIN[-RLJ'J 1\::--:-,T I :71yr:,1 ·ri:-;" \',L1T, .4 -;,ISTAl'-1::--:1 C:T 7.""':,'.~ JG 1--T T'."":1 A 1 '' C, fv1P TC}F' IRC'J ::JIPE ;:.,--HE cc:;,~JEF' '.JF ,; 4 F:JDT ',\":JC:,[J FE~K=--, THEI\JCE R~.I\ \J::;;-7 ~;=--4'5]" EAS-, A._8\3 ~,A,ID L' \'iC:J[; FE\CE. P, ]IS-A\CE c=-631.E:2 =-EET T'."'J .A, 1/2" :>".PF:::D :;,EBA:::: .A-A ::_:rn--;\t_"; Of-'.;;1\_:; f-=-\JCl; HU,IC=--<U~J w_::--;:If-i.59"'1/2:;," \1\ilSI, .1\LJ\::; I-l s:Jlvl7 1-.11\RGh. :J-CLD :J~C IA ~D =STA.TS SU[c,Iv Sl'.J\, A SI i=l',\/1\ ]V l\•1AP cm ::;LA.-Tl l[IC8-, ~[C:)--::Dc=·, AT SI lf"::F 1679-P,, r:;;oR.t..TF R=-ccR--::,s, RA. ;\1,'l'J c,:::rur,rv_ A.I P.RAf/A, .A rn:::Ti'..NCF ::-::F 1C:R/.<;:1 TIT -e; A, 1 C::.A.'1'-8 RllAR; Tl ll'~CT RJI'-. SC::JTI I 01J'1?'~R" 'v\·IS-, P. D STAJJCI ::;-/00.67 F=-=-T -r::_i F. C.AP=rn ~FRA:;; (Ft,, RHC1P=-); THF~J::=-RU\ \::-::R-f---~g·L7':;4" vVFST, A ;Is-A\CF OF )'."::9.'.:.? F=-=--TC1 A 1 R=-=:.tR C\ THF =-AST Rl::;H-OF WAV c=-U.:-:;. '1 GHWAv (;:s: ----j=._\:E F!l_.l'J S'.JI_.T'1 1XY1.~.'43" '/,E•;-, .ALONG THE EA'.::T Rl~'1-OF '\",';v ('.::-S/, L; I_I '.:. -,::;7',1/1\·~ !J/::1., ,\ _'.IS t'~'.:C. Cf-j_=1'=: -c_c_ I'...:: 1\ :i/'.f' ,:_;,t,.-"fJ[__l f-s.'[_::'.:1\-i (C1\-' IO·cl-L:':J); IHC.N'.:=-RU\ SCU IH ,'.'.,:CH i'0-1'' l:\'.:.: /•LUI\J(_; S:',ll: k :_:r -,:_;,f--W/·.v, Jl'.:.,I/\NCl Ur 2./.US f-=-ll I():\ O"XO" CJN::A~=-I=-k'.;H -!Jf--\'/!\Y 'v'C.HvMl~JI, H=-\::..'l R~~, SC,...JIH u,:;-11·10" '1''<'-~C, ,'\ICN(; S:\; f-?,:;H -0--'N,\Y, /1 IJ~Cl/\hCf-U-jj~_/9 -f-f-I'.l 1/)'' C:'-rrF--:: RF=3/\R :=-_,'\IR-J7F): --=-\CF =:;u,1 sm,-'1 ?,9"16'/0'' =-,\ST, .\ JIS-1\\:::F CF /Oi3.60 F=-=-T -,:::1 A.,/.?" C.Ar--=rn ~FRA:::;; T-=-\:-:F ~J~, ~JC:RTH OJ'55':')')" w=-sT, ,L, --::,ISTAl'-ICF ::;-7 00 ,--T TJ .A , /)'' '.":APPi-::, -;:TnA.R: --1\CT RUJ S'.":il_, -I /J" :;.'c::7" I AS-, ,A --::, ST ...... 1,Jc-::;=-R:':-.H FFFT TC:• A 1/7'" c;..F'PF--:: RF7A.R (=-AIR-c:::•F): -7=-\::-,F R,,I') '.'<LTH 7-·71'15'" FAST, A _;IS A\CC. Ur 4':": .. .5..'.; -[:_[_ 10 A • /L" CM-;f.J[__) R=-t:iAr! :-.A.lk-'._:f-'t_\ f-[_\JC[_ ,:Lm suu f-1::,:5'.:.)'L/" l,\~, 1\ LJSl1\~JC=-:J-L/JLL.=1 -c_c_ C 1/L" C1\fJ-•t_J kU:::L\-; ,'.-/-.h70f-Jl); IHl~JC=-HU'~ '.:;C,u H 11':::,:2",11" =--\SI,,\ JISl,f,J,::...:c_ Ur %.>3,1 f-[_[_I IC/• "/L." C1\'I'[__; kl:)'\k (C1\-:..;bU•1-LS\ IHl~,::.:,c_ k'L\J ~JLIH ~s,:..;=:':c:_:_:;" l/\S /\ JSl/',NC=-Ur 'd2.il_ f-=-l 10 ,\ 1/1'' C,\l'l't__; Rl:::1/\R; IHl\JC=-RU\J SCUl7 0'=1"j/1J,1'· N=-':;, :\ )SI/\NC=-Uf-Sl.'..': -lll IC 1\ 1/7'' C";:\PPFC F;=-=J:\R :F1\l~HJ:::,F\ T-Fl~CF :::;Lm smr-76"C::3',J?," '-/,'FST, D ST.1\NCF :JF 1:J7.17 =-FFT -::) A. 1 2 . .'\PFFD :;;FR1q (FA ::;>HOPF); THFl'JC=-Rl,i'-1 SCl,Tf---f:,0"4L'CJS'. w=-?:T, A --:,ISTAl'-JCF C::-F ?C).JC F=-FT TO A , /) •• C;,:::•p=-J RFRi'..R (=-.t.lR-CF·F); -H=-t\C:F RU\ SJl_,TH c,c,·12'3q'" ',NEST, ,4 JIST,ANCE OF 21c!.3[, =-EE-TC: A 1/2" :;::::::'.AR 0\ -H::: \:JR--'\IGf-I '._l-1NAY Uf-~.41_'. t:l.~._U'.-\1I1'1 C'.j-J, IY Hll;HV.Af jL; IHU~C=-r-;l_l'J '.::c,1_1 H i:Q'4~~'j:CJ°' -A:'::T .. ~. ~IS-.4\(T 01 ,:;::,:-;4,.-,;1 Tl--r: Tl Ii F:l 'r ::;-rr;---:I1,nJl'J::;, -RACT C'.")\ T.AINS /'0 .. '/J 1\::::R:::S. r-~c:,p::: 0~ LESS, /.1,r:: LES 11,1 sou-H1/1/:::ST cu.r..R-E==? OF SEC-J\I J3, -C'N\SH 7 [ SCJ IH, ,:A.h(.;t_ L C.A',:: A UP, IL F .. S. ~m. MAY 19, 2020 -SHEET 1 OF 1 BOUNDARY SURVEY AND PIAT OF MINOR SUBDMSION DESIGN M.S.P. DRAWN A.E.F. CHKD. M.S.P. ENG SURVEYOR V.L.G. PROJ MGR M.S.P. I Dewberry· SCALE 1 "=80' PROJ. N0.50120268 FILE MINOR SUBDV SHEET 1 OF 1
1 SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision - June 1, 2020
Planning Commission
June 1, 2020
Subdivision Approval
Case: SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision
Project Name:
Roberds Subdivision
Site Data:
Lot 1 - 1.27 acres +/-
Lot 2 – 0.35 acres +/-
Project Type:
Minor Subdivision
Jurisdiction:
Fairhope Planning Jurisdiction
Zoning District:
Unzoned Baldwin County Planning
District 17
PPIN Number:
346487
General Location:
1,000 ft south of HWY 104/HWY
181 intersection fronting on west
side of St. Hwy. 181
Engineer:
S.E. Civil, LLC
Owner:
Roberds Bros., LLC
School District:
Fairhope Elementary,
Middle, and High Schools
Recommendation:
Approval with conditions
Prepared by:
J. Buford King,
Development Services Manager
l
Legend
...... Subject Parce l
CITY OF FA IRHOPE ZONING
Zon ing
~ TR To"'~' Reso rt
1111 R-A Res id entia l /Agri aJ lture District
R-1 Lo w Dens ity Sing le-F a mil y
llIIID Rt (a)
~Rt (b)
C'J Rt (c)
1111 R-2 Medium Density Sin gle-fam ily
1111 R-3 High Dens ity Single-F amil y
R-3 PGH Patio/G arden Single Fa m~y
c=J R-3 lli Tov.nhouse Sin gle Fam~y
1111 R----4 low Dens 'lty Multi.family
R-5 High Dens ity Dwe lling Res ide ntial
R-6 Mobil e Hom e Par1c District
1111 B-1 Local Shopping District
B--2 G eneral Business Distri ct
1111 B-3a Touri st Resort Lodging Distri ct
1111 B-3b Tourist Resort Commerci al Serv ice Distri ct
1111 B-4 Busin ess and Profession al District
llll t,1-1 Li ght lndusl ri alDistrict
1111 P-1 Pal1cing
PUD Plan ne<i Un it Developm e nt
c=J Parc el lot Li ne
2 SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision - June 1, 2020
Summary of Request:
Public hearing to consider the request of S. E. Civil, LLC on behalf of property owner Roberds Bros. LLC, for a
request for approval of the Roberds Subdivision, a 2-lot minor subdivision. Subject property is located
approximately 1,000’ south of the intersection of State HWY 104 and State HWY 181, fronting upon the west
side of HWY 181. Subject property consists of approximately 1.62 acres. Mr. David Diehl, PLS of S.E. Civil
serves as the surveyor of record for subject application. Subject property is the location of a Multiple
Occupancy Project (MOP) that was approved April 1, 2019 via case number SD 19.16 and this minor
subdivision case seeks to maintain the MOP approval concurrent with the creation of two new lots.
MINOR SUBDIVSION CRITERIA
The following item are excerpts from the various checklists utilized by staff to evaluate subject application’s
compliance with the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations and other
relevant ordinances and are included here to provide relevant background and rationale behind staff’s
recommendation. Any items remaining in red italic text will be cured by conditions of approval, or in the
case of a recommendation for denial of an application, provide rationale for the recommendation of denial.
Any items initially marked “revise and resubmit” have been cured by the notations in blue text, which may
include conditions of approval.
Article IV, Section C.1.b.(9) Location/dimensions of lands to be dedicated or reserved for parks, open space or other
public use
☒N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments
Commentary: This item is generally not required for minor subdivisions unless the minor subdivision affects or
modifies an area containing existing commons areas or greenspace.
Comments: Please see Article IV, Section C.1.b.(17) for more information regarding the greenspace associated
with subject property that must be reflected on the plat. Subject property was previously-approved as an MOP
requiring 10% greenspace, or 0.0162 acres. The greenspace has been amended to reflect 0.13 acres (outside
the highway construction setback) along the property’s frontage along HWY 181 on Lot 1 with an additional
0.07 acres on the west side of lot 2, for a total of 0.2 acres total greenspace reflected on the plat. This
arrangement satisfies the 10% greenspace requirement for the MOP and applies 10% greenspace to each lot
within the existing MOP.
Article IV, Section C.1.b.(11) Flow model data submitted to the standards of the COF Water Department.
☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments
Comments: Not furnished, please include with the follow-up submittal. This submittal should satisfy condition of
approval # 1 from Case # SD 19.16. Follow-up correspondence indicates the 12” water main described in case
# SD19.16 is still not functioning and thus a flow model cannot yet be completed. The anticipated flow and
pressure of a 12” main should be more than substantial for the site and the condition of approval for case SD
19.16 will be memorialized for subject case and the flow model required for file purposes.
Article IV, Section C.1.g. State or County ROW detailed highway improvements plan:
If any state right-of-way or any improvement thereon is proposed to be changed or modified, a detailed Highway
Improvements Plan, with the written approval of the responsible official of the Alabama Highway Department,
showing all existing features within the rights-of-way and all proposed changes, including, but not limited to,
changes in traffic patterns, markings, signs, curbs and barriers, neutral zones, signals, warnings, plantings and
landscaping. There shall be submitted with and as a part of the Plan a written statement setting forth means proposed
for traffic control and safety during construction and for restoration of the site. All of the foregoing shall also apply
to rights-of-way controlled by the County, except that the County Engineer's approval shall appear on the Plat to be
reviewed by the Planning Commission.
☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments
Comments: Not furnished – please include with follow-up correspondence. An additional copy of the EOR’s
letter from February 2019 that was included in case number SD 19.16 was included with the follow-up
correspondence. Because the proposed use and unit count of the property has not changed, and the copy of
I I
I I
I I
3 SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision - June 1, 2020
the letter was included with a cover referencing subject application, this letter is accepted and considered
valid for subject application.
Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(17) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting
requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information:
(17) Maintenance Plan for maintenance of detention facilities during development and documents providing for
continued maintenance after completion of development and sale of all lots. Such documents running as a covenant
with the lands.
☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments
Cross Reference: Article V, Section F.3.a.(3)
Comments: The O&M Plan and Agreement required by condition of approval # 4 of MOP case # SD 19.16 has
not been furnished as of this writing. Please include an amendment O&M Plan and Agreement reflecting the
drainage system of Lots 1 and 2 with the follow-up correspondence submittal. A draft O&M Plan and
Agreement was furnished with follow-up correspondence. When recorded, condition of approval #2 of SD
19.16 will be fulfilled
Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks
Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which
are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring
sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of
Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering
practice. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments
Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended, and Article V, Section D.6.
Pedestrian Area Design Standard and note the performance bond provisions.
Comments: Sidewalks are not depicted along HWY 181- please advise how sidewalks are handled within subject
application. If a waiver from the sidewalk requirement is desired the waiver must be furnished in sufficient time
for advertisement purposes. Waiver request submitted with follow-up correspondence.
The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article V.B.2. “Approval Standards”. Each of these
criteria is addressed below with either a “meets” or “does not meet” comment. If any of the criteria is not
met, a denial will be recommended.
Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision
of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as
proposed, due to any of the following:
a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive
Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable;
• meets
b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or
program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a
Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;
• meets
c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;
• Does not meet
o Proposed Lot 2 does not front upon a paved, publicly-maintained street. A wavier from this
requirement was submitted and staff does not object to the waiver because future
subdivision of proposed Lot 2 appears highly unlikely.
o Sidewalks are not shown and not proposed for installation along the HWY 181 frontage. A
waiver has been submitted for this requirement, and staff does not object to the waiver as
sidewalks were not required by the Planning Commission when MOP case number SD 19.16
was approved.
I I
I I
4 SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision - June 1, 2020
d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and
regulations; or
• meets
e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or
property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.”
• Does not appear to endanger health, safety, welfare, or property. The Planning Commission my
wish to rule on this item.
Enlarged Maps:
Looking west toward subject property along
HWY 181
Looking southwest toward subject property
From HWY 181
5 SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision - June 1, 2020
Enlarged Zoning Map:
Recommendation:
Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case # SD 20.26 subject to the conditions below:
1) Prior-approved Multiple Occupancy Project (MOP) via case number SD 19.16 is preserved and
memorialized by this condition of approval with the following requirements:
a. Lot 1 is limited to six (6) units
b. Lot 2 is limited to three (3) units
c. The addition of any new units will require a new MOP application
2) Memorialize condition of approval #1 from case SD 19.16 will be satisfied by the following follow-up
tasks by the applicant also related to subject application:
l
N
STATE HWY
104
j
6 SD 20.26 Roberds Subdivision - June 1, 2020
a. Submission of a flow model test of the new 12” water main more fully-described in case SD
19.16.
b. The 12” main is not yet in service but should be more than adequate pressure and flow to serve
subject property
c. The Planning Commission may wish to rule on Article V Section B.2.e. as this is a health, safety,
welfare, and property issue. A private fire hydrant serving the property was included in the
utility drawings included with case number SD 19.16.
3) Memorialize condition of approval #4 from case SD 19.16 will be satisfied by the following follow-up
tasks by the applicant also related to subject application:
a. Record the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Plan and Agreement once the slide
number of the recorded plat is identified.
b. Furnish the instrument number of the recorded O&M Plan and Agreement to staff once
recorded.
4) Condition of approval #5 from case SD 19.16 has been fulfilled as follows:
a. Greenspace has been amended to reflect 0.13 acres (outside the highway construction setback)
along the property’s frontage along HWY 181 on Lot 1
b. 0.07 acres greenspace is reflected on the plat on the west side of lot 2
c. Total of 0.2 acres total greenspace is reflected on the plat, satisfying the 10% total greenspace
requirement for the MOP and applies 10% greenspace to each lot within the existing MOP.
5) Planning Commission Consideration of the waiver request that Lot 2 not be required to front upon a
paved, publicly-maintained street.
a. Staff does not object to the waiver because future subdivision of proposed Lot 2 appears highly
unlikely without complete redevelopment of subject property. Proposed lot 2 will be accessed
via a common access easement shown on the plat.
6) Planning Commission Consideration of the waiver request from furnishing sidewalks along the HWY
181 frontage.
a. Staff does not object to the waiver because sidewalks were not required by the Planning
Commission when MOP case number SD 19.16 was considered.
b. Further, the nearest sidewalk along the HWY 181 ROW is greater than one road mile from
subject property.
7) Reflection of any notes on the plat as required by Baldwin County.
Civil
ROBERDS BROTHERS LLC
(251) 990-6566
880 HOLCOMB BLVDFAIRHOPE, AL 36532
Engineering& Surveying
PROJ MGR
OFSHEET
FILE
PROJECT
SCALE
DED
11
ROBERDS SUBDIVISION
20200666
1"=30'
CHKD.DED
DRAWN SGGBOUNDARY SURVEY
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
LEGEND:
0 15 30 60
30 SCALE
STATE HIGHWAY 181 (AKA CR-27)190 FT. R.O.W.LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SURVEYOR\ENGINEER
S.E. CIVIL
880 HOLCOMB BLVD
FAIRHOPE, AL 36532
UTILITIES
WATER SERVICE: FAIRHOPE UTILITIES
SEWER SERVICE: BALDWIN COUNTY SEWER SERVICE
ELECTRIC SERVICE: RIVIERA UTILITIES
TELEPHONE SERVICE: AT&T
PARCEL NO. 05-46-02-10-0-000-030.126
PPIN 346487
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
FAIRHOPE, AL 36532
ROBERDS BROTHERS LLC21883 STATE HWY 181, STE D
FLOOD STATEMENT
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF FAIRHOPE UTILITIES (WATER):
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY
GENERAL NOTES:
& SUBDIVISION
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY E-911 ADDRESSING
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY BALDWIN COUNTY SEWER
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY RIVIERA UTILITIES (ELECTRIC)
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY AT&T
ROBERDS BROTHERS SUBDIVISION
CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP
CERTIFICATE OF NOTARY PUBLIC:
SITE
VICINITY MAP
1" = 1 MILE
LOT 1
LOT 2
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE
SITE DATA:
ZONING: UNZONED
TOTAL ACREAGE: 1.62 AC
NUMBER OF LOTS: 2
SMALLEST LOT: 0.35 ACLARGEST LOT: 1.27 AC.
DENSITY: 1.2 UNITS PER ACRE
COMMON EASEMENT DRAINAGE: 0.51 AC.
LC
Cb 4b 02 , :J :J :::,:::,c c_:,j:J_:J, :J
iii\: 2612:)2 _)II\. 2[1('.::)1
o:) L6 02 -•:_:, :J :_:oc c,:;o_:y_:2.
F·l~,I: 2::3-185:.::,
Ci\\.F'FIF 8, =-RC ,JOSFPH =-Ti\l
CAcl 0 -ell L
05-1 C-'.)/-• :·;-U-C-CC-UJO.:)U7
=:ill\: 26181G
G_L-mc~. lill'LCCA A
RCCC~RS, MAR-f-A C
99:::,s HC:LLO'·h'3~CCI< /,\/~
I.:., ;I ICPL. ,i;_L jf..:_ 52
Cl~,I<. RCJI\A 1; ,. FT,4.I 21~\K, _,=-,AJ,I lvL,'.:.,::;; =-A qq_•ifi f-'.) I C'.'iHf-,(:'.)'.)< ."'.H
F.A, ~-K)l'F, Al -~'C:'53/
~;:-;,sc; 11011 0\!1/---!?CCK A'vT
F/\1,HOcE, /'-L 36532
1/2.CRS
{SE Cl\4L)
IR-11
120.00'
r 20'BSL
I
I
I
0.35 AC
15,299 SF
(COMMERCIA )
5/B.CRF
(EDS)
------7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 20'BSL L ___________________ _
12 .0 '
19 1 C-C:1 ST/,-F HWY 18
I .Al \I OPL, .~.L j(:,:._; . ..52
1w; -::,'iO,Hf:
IR-11 CMS
(SE Cl'IIL)
0
0
0 "' /
0
I{)
r---
N
w .;,-&
' j:7 ,P
0) <fl'"' r') "f"'
~
0
b
0 z
-c o cco c3::,_c,c 1
'.Oii:': 10\,1L:31L,A,_'. \/ILL.AG_ i/21
I.A.Ii< 1::---'[, P,_ ,365.32
RIJ )US -;,:-; 591
NS 167:J721
1/2.CRF
{CRENSHAW)
340.35'
C5 46 02 1 ·'J O :Joe: C.3C O:J6 H'.:11 ()VVHRO'.)-< Sl,~ )1\/1'.-:IOI\
=1 1~,I: /C-12L8 CClvllv'CN .P,R:E,~.
,J/\~,IF-Ti\\/F=;\J/,, =:F~ri\l S I IC:
129 CH~SH.L T RIDGE GRANT OF "PERMISSIVE USE"
A ~I Cf-:_, AL j[': :'.2 DATED JUNE 24, 2005 & __ _,,RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT
No. 905042 11\S l4C(;/I/
w "' 2 0
~ ITT
0
~ w
~
0
36.2'
2-STORY
WOOD/STUCCO
BUILDING
F.F.E~ 119.00
39.1'
259.00'
,~'.,_:-4b-C2.-1 :J-:J-DJc,_,:_:,5c .CUL
Ill~~.·, _;)-!0.1)
Nao· 16'5o"E
, ,,,,,.-22.24•
/ [I]
TRANSFORMER
112•~5
(SE CML) S44"43'30"E
/ 28.28'
"' I{)
-'4'
N
1/ll-!
1/2"CRF
(MOORE)
I
I
I
"I
~I
'i:,:.1
-1
I
I
/'J-DR '-D:::. t•;ll,::;'.K D ~T J>< RE::;/\f\ M
2 875 -\1VV 181 (1\.,1,A,)
PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONE "X" UNSHADED AS
SCALED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER
01003C0661 M, COMMUNITY NUMBER 015000, PANEL
0661, SUFFIX "M", DATED APRIL 19, 2019.
LOT 2, RE-SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2, W. L. BEASLEY
SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED ON SLIDE
2535-F, PROBATE RECORDS BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA; LESS
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
ALABAMA BY FEE SIMPLE WARRANTY DEED DATES SEPTEMBER 17,
2015 AND RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT No. 1534885.
1. THERE MAY BE RECORDED OR UNRECORDED DEEDS,
EASEMENTS. RIGHT-OF-WAYS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH
COULD AFFECT THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID PROPERTIES.
2. THERE WAS NO ATTEMPT TO DETERMINE THE EXISTENCE,
LOCATION, OR EXTENT OF ANY SUB-SURFACE FEATURES.
3. THE LINES REPRESENTING THE CENTERLINE AND
RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF THE STREETS ARE SHOWN FOR VISUAL
PURPOSES ONLY AND WERE NOT SURVEYED UNLESS
RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTATION IS ALSO SHOWN.
4. SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED ON FEBRUARY 2020, AND IS
RECORDED IN AN ELECTRONIC FIELD BOOK.
5. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON WERE "COMPUTED"
FROM ACTUAL FIELD TRAVERSES, AND ARE BASED ON STATE
PLANE GRID, ALABAMA WEST ZONE USING GPS OBSERVATIONS.
6. NO TITLE SEARCH OR REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS
SURVEY.
7. THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING
IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2017.
I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL PARTS OF THIS SURVEY AND DRAWING
HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT
REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING IN
THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,
INFORMATION, AND BELIEF.
_---lf-,-~_:=_2: __ .a ___ Q2:...Z~..::..2Q_~Q
DAVID AL. P.L.S. NO. 26014 DATE
SURVEY NOT VALID WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, _____ _ __ AS PROPRIETOR(S),
HAVE CAUSED THE LAND EMBRACED IN THE WITHIN PLAT TO BE
SURVEYED, LAID OUT AND PLATTED TO BE KNOWN AS STAAB DIVISION,
BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, AND THAT THE STREETS AND EASEMENTS,
AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE USE OF THE
PUBLIC
DATED THIS DAY OF 2020,
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE
STATE OF ALABAMA
COUNTY OF BALDWIN
I, ________ , NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY, IN
SAID STATE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT-----------~ AS
OWNER OF THE LANDS PLATTED HEREON IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING
INSTRUMENT, AND WHO IS KNOWN TO ME, ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON
THIS DAY THAT, BEING INFORMED OF THE CONTENT OF THE INSTRUMENT,
AND AS SUCH LEASEHOLD OWNER AND WITH FULL AUTHORITY, EXECUTED
THE SAME VOLUNTARILY.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE ___ DAY
OF ________________ _
NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY BALDWIN COUNTY SEWER SERVICE, LLC
HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE
PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS ___ DAY OF
___________ , 2020,
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY AT&T HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN
PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN
COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS ___ DAY OF
2020,
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY RIVIERA UTILITIES HEREBY APPROVES
THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF
BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS ___ DAY OF
, 2020,
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
=-:\ ~HCP=-. .,\I 365,".,J
I\S 1'1''941
CERTIFICATE OF THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS DIRECTOR OF THE BALDWIN COUNTY PLANNING
AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR
RECORDING OF THE SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN
COUNTY, ALABAMA THIS DAY OF -------~ 2020.
PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS COUNTY ENGINEER OF BALDWIN COUNTY,
ALABAMA, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING
OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA,
THIS THE DAY OF _________ 2020.
COUNTY ENGINEER
THIS PLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY
PLANNING COMMISSION OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA, AND IS APPROVED BY
SUCH COMMISSION.
THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION
BY: _______________ DATE: _______ _
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY BALDWIN COUNTY E-911
BOARD. HEREBY APPROVES THE ROAD NAMES AS DEPICTED ON THE
WITHIN PLAT AND HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE
RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATED OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY.
ALABAMA, THIS ___ ,DAY OF _______ ~ 2020.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE
UTILITIES HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING
OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA,
THIS DAY OF-------~ 2019,
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
c,S-4C--C,' -11-C-CCJ:J-UJ' .SC)!" \L .?6' '.-i49
FS-R:=:C-<"1/ff_L, P/\~L/\. L
h' 1·v,:;r\:; :;,t._ll IANI
'.DEN-'.JI-IE, lvl:: 2-11,3
:J'..:• 48 c, 1 11 C C()'.j :y_:,' .~oC2
N. )ii18-1";:J
FST F:OCK'/,;E_L. KEl-1flET7 & LI\JA
217L8 s-7',VY '51
I All~ ()-'I , ;:.. ,~~:J.':1/
THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF
ALABAMA HOLDING CERTIFICATE No. 26348, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
HAVE DESIGNED THE WITHIN IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFORMITY WITH
APPLICABLE CODES AND LAWS AND WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF GOOD
ENGINEERING PRACTICE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITHIN IMPROVEMENTS, THAT THE SAME
CONFORMS TO MY DESIGN, THAT THE WITHIN IS A TRUE AND
ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AS INSTALLED AND
THAT SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE HEREBY RECOMMENDED FOR
ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA.
I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE WITHIN IMPROVEMENTS, THAT THE SAME CONFORMS TO MY
DESIGN, THAT THE WITHIN IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE
REPRESENTATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AS INSTALLED AND THAT SAID
IMPROVEMENTS ARE HEREBY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE
CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA.
THOMAS L. SMITH, PL DA TE_
ROBERDS SUBDIVISION PLANS WHICH ARE CERTIFIED CONSIST OF PAGE
1 THRU 17, EACH OF WHICH BEARS BY SEAL AND SIGNATURE,
1. FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES, SEE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
2. STORMWATER DETENTION AREAS ARE NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY OF
FAIRHOPE OR BALDWIN COUNTY TO MAINTAIN BUT SHALL BE JOINTLY MAINTAINED
BY THE OWNERS OF LOTS 1 & 2 AS OUTLINED IN A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT.
3. ALL UTILITIES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED UNDERGROUND.
4. THERE IS DEDICATED HEREWITH A 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ON ALL LOT
LINES AND COMMON AREAS ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND A 5 FOOT
UTILITY EASEMENT ON EACH SIDE OF LOT AND COMMON AREA LINES, UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. THERE IS DEDICATED HEREWITH A 15 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE
REAR LOT LINES OF ALL LOTS (UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE) AND A 10 FOOT
DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE LOT LINES (5 FOOT OFF EACH SIDE).
::.:hurc:b
IH~---,,t
B.S.L.
.·
~
~'airhopr
~'.hurch ~
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
I
(A & R)
(R) • CRF
CMS
RBF
RECORD BEARING/DISTANCE
CAPPED REBAR SET (26014 S)
CAPPED REBAR FOUND
CONCRETE MONUMENT SET
~ REBAR FOUND (NO CAP)
--0---0---~ WOOD FENCE
!GI = GAS METER
-o"e-= OVERHEAD POWER LINE
'Th ~ UTILITY POLE
~ = WATER METER ® ~ SEWER VALVE
[XI ~ GAS VALVE
~ SIGN
,.--. .
~ ..
~'ricnds •
Ccmcl.crv ••
• ,.,,--..,su
f"'
1 SD 20.27 Bishop Road MOP – June 1, 2020
Planning Commission
June 1, 2020
Multiple Occupancy Project
Case: SD 20.27 Bishop Road MOP
Project Name:
Bishop Road MOP
Site Data:
1.086 acres +/-
7 units
Project Type:
Multiple Occupancy Project
Jurisdiction:
Fairhope Planning Jurisdiction
Zoning District:
R-4
PPIN Number:
383706 and 383707
General Location:
West side of Bishop Road just
north of Gayfer Road.
Engineer:
S.E. Civil, LLC
Owner:
Provision Investments, LLC
School District:
Fairhope Elementary, Middle and
High Schools
Recommendation:
Approval with conditions
Prepared by:
Samara Walley, MCP
City Planner
Subject Site
,_,,,
■ 1!-1-UKIIISnapp;nq Di:fl'T>::;
f!.].C,•-,...•I A~••neuD>..-r~
1!-:i ~ •To.,,~ l<e~~ Lo::19,,ig Q'c$lric;
■ ~!:ioTo~-.. :Ro=,,'!Cim,~IS•"'IL'.II'
■ 1!..:!-S1.1111'1CU•ndP"l'e~ioor.:il C•zni:r
l;<..l .l.,.9'lrlr.dumH• Oiw-=i
■r.1 .r 1 <1<>n9
PUil -P ~nn«!UnitOev,,lccm...u
Ii .I 1.-0•n<r11 Su·1:g ••~~1I)
I rm. 11 u -:.n,,.,.i\J,.,t.rt""
~ f!1(<,) R~~1.1 IJi,.c.,ta,~
R1 lt! RM.J«11l1HJ'lanaifi
ll ·2 Me(l,~m Dil'IH'/ Sing e.'F,i,m~y
■ R-3•-¼~06t!t~S~-F,mi',
R-Vl".M-P.,-,,.,.,.,.'.::i"{l•·::.-m1ly
0 1l-1l)-l,T""""~"!.l-.c;le~m;,'/
• li.4 • .i.-a.O...-JJOYMIMl-i'"e<ni l~
li-~-1't,gn0en,1'1)'0w.,lll~si;:~.,.,,,.,I
1i.b,Mob,lerla..,a P1"'-D,n.-o:
I..A.l,,.1:1:!o-e.!iaL'Ay ",;ullu,_O~ni:i:
0 Pl~'lctRK<>rt
2 SD 20.27 Bishop Road MOP – June 1, 2020
Summary of Request:
Public hearing to consider the request of Provision Investments, LLC for preliminary approval of Bishop Road
MOP, a 7-unit multiple occupancy project. The property is approximately 1.08 acres and is located on the
west side of Bishop Road just north of Gayfer Road. Mr. Larry Smith, PE of S.E. Civil serves as the engineer of
record (EOR) for subject application.
Comments:
The applicant has provided a site plan illustrating two (2) proposed buildings on a 1.08 acre property. There
are 7 units total with a gross density of 6.42 units per acre. The site plan illustrates a sidewalk along Bishop
Road. There is a total of 22 parking spaces provided. Each unit will have a single car garage. There is also an
uncovered parking space (driveway). Lastly, a new fire hydrant will be installed within the required 450’ of
the subject property.
Multiple Occupancy Project Criteria:
The following item are excerpts from the various checklists utilized by staff to evaluate subject application’s
compliance with the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations and other
relevant ordinances and are included here to provide relevant background and rationale behind staff’s
recommendation. Any items remaining in red italic text will be cured by conditions of approval, or in the case
of a recommendation for denial of an application, provide rationale for the recommendation of denial. Any
items initially marked “revise and resubmit” have been cured by the notations in blue text, which may
include conditions of approval.
Article IV, Section B.1a-b. Pre-application Conference and Community meeting
a. Pre‐Application Conference – All applications for major subdivisions, village subdivisions and Multiple Occupancy Projects
must attend a mandatory pre‐application conference with City staff prior to making application so the developer may become
familiar with the comprehensive plan and other rules which may affect the development. A pre‐application conference with the
Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent may be scheduled at the mutual convenience of both parties.
b. Community Meeting – After the pre‐application meeting and prior to making application for a major subdivision, village
Subdivisions or Multiple Occupancy Project the applicant must conduct a community meeting to solicit public input.
(1) Notice of Community Meeting – The applicant shall notify all persons owning property adjacent to any specific
property that is the subject of the application stating the date, time, location, nature and subject of the meeting. The
location of the meeting shall be at a public facility unless the location of the development makes a public facility
impracticable. Names and addresses shall be from the latest records of the county revenue office and accuracy of the list
shall be the applicant’s responsibility. Where land adjacent to the subject property involves leasehold property, the names
and addresses of the landowner and the leasehold improvements shall be notified. Upon application for a major
subdivision, village subdivisions and Multiple Occupancy Projects, the following community meeting information must
be provided:
i. Copy of notice mailed to neighboring properties for the community meeting stating date, time, location, nature
and subject of the meeting.
ii. Copy of site plan or other descriptive information discussed
iii. Attendance sign in sheet.
iv. Meeting minutes
☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments
Comments: Virtual/ phone meeting due to COVID-19; no attendees or callers
Article IV, Section C.1.b.(15) Submit a topographic survey with an aerial photograph with plat overlay. ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments
Comments: No aerial photograph with plat overlay provided
Response: Aerial photograph with plat overlay is provided in resubmittal package.
Article IV, Section C.1.b.(17) Site data box including but not limited to:
• Total acreage of site
• Acreage of common area(s)
I I
I I
3 SD 20.27 Bishop Road MOP – June 1, 2020
o Greenspace requirements of Article V, Section “C” are now applicable to an MOP per
resolution 2018-02 effective 11-28-2018, as amended by resolution 2019-01 effective February
4, 2019.
• Total number of lots or units
• Square footage of each lot
• Site Density
• Number of units proposed ☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments
Commentary: If the unit count includes more than 30 dwelling units, a second entrance may be required to comply
with the International Fire Code.
Comments: Site density should be added to table
Response: Site density is in the table at the bottom right corner of sheet C01.
Article V, Section C.2. Applicability and Requirements: the regulations in this Section C. shall apply to any
development, whether or not in the City Limits. Greenspace amounts to be provided shall be based on the dwelling
unit per acre of a subdivision. For the purposes of this section, net density of a site is the resulting number of units
per acre after removing public or private rights-of-way, storm water infrastructure, wetlands, water course and
undevelopable land based on topography or physical constraints. Greenspace shall be provided as follows:
Units per Acre Open Space Amount
Less than 2 units per acre 10%
2-4 units per acre 15%
4-6 units per acre 20%
More than 6 units per acre 25%
Multiple Occupancy Project (commercial) 10%
Multiple Occupancy Project (residential) Open Space Amount
3 units per acre 15%
4-6 units per acre 20%
More than 6 units per acre 25%
☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments
Cross Reference: Zoning Ordinance Article IV. Site Design Standards Section A. Open Space
Comments: size adequate – no perimeter landscaping as required by Table 4-1
Response: Applicant provided revised landscape plan with perimeter landscaping
Article VI, Section A. Construction Standards-General
The sub-divider shall be required to install or construct improvements hereinafter described prior to having released
bond or other surety which guarantees the installation of such improvements. All improvements required shall be
constructed in conformity with these regulations and in conformity with Chapter 19, Streets, Sidewalks, and Other
Public Ways, of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Fairhope, as amended. All improvements shall be designed
and sealed by a Project Engineer. The Project Engineer shall carry Errors and Omissions Insurance at a
minimum coverage of at least $1,000,000.
☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments
Comments: The insurance provided is expired
Response: Updated insurance has been provided.
Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks
Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those
streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On
streets requiring sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in
Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in
accordance with good engineering practice.
☐N/A ☒Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments
I I
I I
I I
I I
4 SD 20.27 Bishop Road MOP – June 1, 2020
Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended.
Commentary: for an MOP, treat this section in much the same way as a typical subdivision. Though there may be
internal sidewalks not dedicated to the City, there may be perimeter sidewalks in ROWs that are dedicated to the city
or County. Make certain what is and is not dedicated is clear.
Comments: Sidewalks required
Response: Sidewalks have been added in the plans along the Right-of-Way of Bishop Road.
The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. “Approval Standards”. Each of these
criteria is addressed below with either a “meets” or “does not meet” comment. If any of the criteria is not
met, a denial will be recommended.
Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision
of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as
proposed, due to any of the following:
a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s
Zoning ordinance, where applicable;
• Meets
b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or
program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a
Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;
• Meets
c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;
• Meets
d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;
or
• Meets
e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the
planning jurisdiction of the City.”
• Meets
Recommendation:
Staff recommends PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL of SD 20.27 Bishop Road MOP subject to the following
condition:
1) Replat of Lots 1 and 2 into a single lot prior to any land disturbance activities.
S 89°41'17" W 211.36' (O)N 00°00'07" E 367.97' (O)S 00°00'00" E 368.29' (O)SOUTH 367.98' (R)BASIS OF BEARINGSS 89°31'54" W 203' (R)NORTH 367.98' (R)BISHOP ROAD (60' R.O.W.)TBM
CAPPED IRON ROD
ELEVATION = 122.10'
27"
26"
24"
23"
25"
27"
20"
20"
21"
22"
23"
20"
24"
23"
20"
20"
CRF
(BAY
AREA)
(MOORE)
WETLAND FLAGS BY
OTHERS
WETLAND BY OFFSET
WETLAND BUFFER
MARKER
WETLAND BUFFER
CRF
N 00°00'07" E 367.97' (O)NORTH 367.98' (R)±23,672 SQ. FT.
±0.543 AC
ZONING: R-4
±30,461 SQ. FT.
±0.704 AC
ZONING: R-4
211.36'
211.35'112.00'112.00'144.29'143.97'112.00'112.00'3
2
1
±23,672 SQ. FT.
±0.543 AC
ZONING: R-4
35' B.S.L.30' B.S.L.10' B.S.L.
10' B.S.L.
15' B.S.L.35' B.S.L.35' B.S.L.N/F
05-46-02-09-0-000-014.000
CREEL, RYAN ETAL BOOTH,
VINCENT A.
PO BOX 175
MONTROSE, AL 36559
ZONING: UN-ZONED
N/F
05-46-02-09-0-000-015.000
BALDWIN, RICHARD ETUX TAMARA
105 HOMESTEAD VILLAGE #4
FAIRHOPE, AL 36532
ZONING: UN-ZONED
N/F
05-46-02-09-0-000-016.011
RIVENBARK, R. L. ETAL RIVENBARK,
BETTY E.
5841 RIVENBARK LANE
FAIRHOPE, AL 36532
ZONING: R-4
N/F
05-46-02-09-0-000-016.000
SCOPOLITES, JAMES M.
8613 GAYFER AVE EXT
FAIRHOPE, AL 36532
ZONING: UN-ZONED
CRS
CRSCRS
CRS 5' (TYP.)63'45'FFE=124.005' (TYP.)85'FFE=124.00CLUSTER
MAILBOXES
10'20'20'25'25'22'20'R
1
5
'R15'40'10'20'25'13'22'40'20'
R
2
5
'R25'CONCRETE PAVING(TYP.) SEE DETAILSTOP SIGN (R1-1), STREET
NAME SIGNS, & STOP BAR
N/F
05-46-02-09-0-000-015.001
WILKINS, TAYLOR D. III
PO BOX 7849
SPANISH FORT, AL 36577
ZONING: R-4
R
4
'
R4'
R
4
'DETENTION POND 1DETENTION POND 230' B.S.L.4
4
14'6'24'R4'45'
DETECTABLE WARNING PAD
(TYP.) SEE DETAIL
5' WIDE SIDEWALK (TYP.)
SEE DETAIL
800 10 20 40
20 SCALE SHEETC01
20190565
JRB
DRAWN
DATE
SCALE
JOB No.
5/14/20
1"=20'SEALAFFIXREVISIONDATER
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call SITE PLANCivil Engineering& Surveying880 Holcomb Blvd, Ste 2FFairhope, AL 36532251-990-6566Bishop Road MOPBishop RoadFairhope, AL 36532CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR
RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID.
TO ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED
FOR SITE WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES
THE DRAWINGS. CONCRETE FOR CURBING SHALL BE 3000 PSI.
REFER TO THE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR PLANTING LOCATIONS AND ISLAND DETAILS.
PAINTED STRIPING SHALL BE BRIGHT AND CLEAR. STRIPES SHALL BE PER PLAN AND PAINTED
CURBING SHALL BE FORMED AND POURED CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED WITHIN
ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED TO BE TRUE AND ACCURATE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.
THE SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS IS SHOWN WITHIN THESE PLANS. ALL EXISTING
ON CLEAN ASPHALT OR CONCRETE.
THIS SITE IS R-4.
ALL ISLANDS WITH CURB & GUTTER SHALL BE LANDSCAPED.
NOTIFY CITY OF FAIRHOPE INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF EVERY
PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION.
ALL STRIPING IN R.O.W. TO BE CLASS A TYPE 2 THERMOPLASTIC.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED GOVERNMENTAL
A COPY OF THE APPROVED LAND DISTURBANCE PLAN AND PERMIT SHALL BE PRESENT ON SITE
WHENEVER LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS.
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN REQUIRED R.O.W. AND MUST BE
STORED WITHIN THE SITE.
DURING CONSTRUCTION, ACCESS ROADWAYS CONSTRUCTED OF AN ALL WEATHER SURFACE
CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING 75,000 POUNDS GROSS WEIGHT SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE WIDTH OF
THE ACCESS ROADWAY, DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE 20 FT PER STANDARD FIRE
PREVENTION CODE, LATEST EDITION.
ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKINGS USED ON THE SITE WILL CONFORM WITH THE
MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), FHWA, LATEST EDITION.
REFERENCE THE SIGN CODES CONTAINED IN THE MUTCD FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS.
NOTE THE COLOR AND SIZE OF ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS, REFERENCING DETAILS IN ALDOT'S
ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE.
NO "PROTECTED TREES" WILL BE REMOVED, DESTRUCTIVELY DAMAGED, MUTILATED,
RELOCATED, DISFIGURED, DESTROYED, CUT DOWN, OR EXCESSIVELY PRUNED DURING
SITE PLAN NOTES
REGULATIONS AND CODES AS WELL AS O.S.H.A. AND ALDOT STANDARDS.
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE & BALDWIN COUNTY
FIRE LANES AND SIGNAGE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1 CHAPTER 18.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
AT THE SITE; INCLUDING UTILITIES, SURFACES, ETC. AND SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR
ANY DAMAGES THEY CAUSE TO NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY AND ANY
UNAUTHORIZED DISRUPTION TO UTILITIES ON SITE AND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING UTILITIES AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS AND CROSSINGS
SHALL BE FIELD EXCAVATED TO VERIFY LOCATIONS, ELEVATION AND SIZE. NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DEVIATIONS OR CONFLICTS.
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE =1.09 ACRES.
INSPECTIONS.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
PROPOSEDEXISTING
SITE PLAN LEGEND
TRAFFIC CONTROL ARROW
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ASPHALT PAVING
X" SYSL - X" WIDE SINGLE YELLOW SOLID LINE
X" DYSL - X" WIDE DOUBLE YELLOW SOLID LINE
X" SWSL - X" WIDE SINGLE WHITE SOLID LINE
CONCRETE PAVING
GRAVEL PAVING
HEADER CURB
RIBBON CURB
PARKING DATA
TOTAL REQUIRED (2 SPACES/ UNIT) =
PARKING REQUIREMENT SPACES
14
BUILDING (UNDER ROOF)
SITE ANALYSIS
6,817 SF (7 UNITS)
SITE ACREAGE (PROPOSED)
±1.09 AC (47,344 SF)
BUILDING SETBACKS:
FRONT YARD:
SIDE YARD:
REAR YARD:
MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:
30 FT
10 FT
35 FT
30 FT
BUILDING HEIGHT
30 FT (MAX.)
PROVIDED PARKING
22 SPACES
REQUIRED PARKING
14 SPACES (SEE PARKING DATA)
JURISDICTION
CITY OF FAIRHOPE
PERVIOUS AREA
0.72 AC (66.5%)
IMPERVIOUS AREA
0.37 AC (33.5%)
REQUIRED:
PROPERTY AREA
LAND USAGE
--1.09 ACRES (47,344 SF)
BUILDING AREA (UNDER ROOF)14.4%0.16 ACRES (6,817 SF)
IMPERVIOUS PAVING 0.21 ACRES (9,052 SF)
GRASSED/LANDSCAPED AREA 0.72 ACRES (31,475 SF)
DESCRIPTION % OF PROPERTY AREAAREA
19.1%
66.5%
ZONING
R-4
TOTAL PROVIDED =22
PARKING - EACH UNIT HAS A SINGLE CAR GARAGE. THERE IS ALSO AN
UNCOVERED PARKING SPACE (DRIVEWAY)
CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCH. PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS23.
OF EXIT PORCHES; PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.24.
SITE DATA:
1. ACREAGE IN TOTAL TRACT: 1.09 ACRES
2. SMALLEST LOT/UNIT SIZE: 1,814 SF
3. TOTAL SQUARE FEET OF EACH LOT OR UNIT: 12,698 SF
4. TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS: 7
5. LINEAR FEET IN STREETS: 265 LF (PRIVATE)
6. NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES: 22 SPACES
7. AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.37 ACRES
8. DENSITY (GROSS):6.42 UNITS/AC
9. DENSITY (NET, FOR CALCULATING GREENSPACE, FAIRHOPE) 8.54 UNITS/AC
10. TOTAL SF OF ALL AREAS RESERVED FOR TOTAL OPEN SPACE: N/A
11. TOTAL SF OF ALL AREAS RESERVED FOR USEABLE OPEN SPACE: N/A
12. GREENSPACE:0.44 ACRES
OWNER:
KATAPULT PROPERTIES, LLC
19940 STATE HWY 181
FAIRHOPE, AL 36532
FLOOD ZONE:
FIRM NO. 01003C0642M EFFECTIVE DATE APRIL 19, 2019, SHOWS THE PROPERTY TO
BE SITUATED IN ZONE X UNSHADED.
UTILITY PROVIDERS:
WATER - FAIRHOPE UTILITIES
SEWER - FAIRHOPE UTILITIES
ELECTRIC - RIVIERA UTILITIES
GREENSPACE CALCULATIONS (CITY OF FAIRHOPE):
ACREAGE IN TOTAL TRACT: 1.09 ACRES
WETLANDS:0 ACRES
PONDS:0.11 ACRES
ASPHALT ROADS:0.16 ACRES
NET ACREAGE: 0.82 ACRES
DENSITY (NET) = 7 UNITS/0.82 ACRES:8.54 UNITS/ACRE
GREENSPACE REQUIRED (25% OF 1.09 ACRES): 0.27 ACRES
GREENSPACE PROVIDED:0.44 ACRES
0>----
1
I
---_, _,
:------------------
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.. , ... ... •
◄.--...J " ./ .... <f. . ., . • .f•.' . . .
. -., . :_
•
•. •
•
.. ·• ·'·. •
I
I ~---------Et======~~~=--==:!
r----------
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1---.....
' ' \
--" _, ------
\
\
\
..
•
•. . . . -• .. ,.
•
• i.: •
,_
(
. . .
•
• I
----
I
I
I .....
' ' 1-
I
: .; 4
-" -
--7
I
I
I
I
I --
. .
" .....
I
I
I
I
,_
• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
' .
• . .
,.J.
• •
. •·
,· . ,.,
• •.
• ·•
..
.•
•
...
• ,
...
.i ,.
·,{
•·
I I I . ·1
I 7 I · ,:\ I
I 7
I
I
N
Date: 04/15/2020
To: Fairhope Planning Board
Property owner: Barbara Childress
Re: Rural division of property
Purpose: To deed two daughters and one grandson property
The following diagrams are a rough draft of the layout of the property as it exist now and how we wish
to divide the property. If we receive positive opinions from this board our intent is to have it surveyed as
close to the dimensions of this draft as possible. Thank you for your consideration.
Diagram one
Shows the current layout of the land Mrs. Childress wishes to divide between three of her heirs.
Properties labelled 1 and 2 are already owned by Sherrie and James Henderson, Mrs. Childress's
daughter and son-in-law. Mrs. Childress owns the remainder of the property.
Diagram two
This diagram shows how Mrs. Childress wishes to divide the property between the three parties. Her
grandson will receive one acre and her two daughters will divide the remaining property.
The property labelled 3 is to go to Sherrie Henderson, her daughter. This property surrounds a home the
Henderson's have owned and lived in for thirty years.
The property labelled 4 is to go to Marcie Payne, her daughter. The small rectangle close to county road
eleven represents a four bedroom home that Mrs. Payne and her family have lived in for over twenty
years. Mrs. Childress provided a start for the home, but Mrs. Payne has paid for most of the build and
subsequent improvements.
The property labelled 5 is to go to Adam Brantley, her grandson. He has a mobile home on the property
and has been living there for over ten years. He now has a small family and plans to build a home.
An easement on the west side of the property already exist. With this division we plan to include an
easement on the east side of the property and a small easement on the north side of the property so
that Mr. Brantley can access his property.
The striped lines down the side and back of the diagram represent the easements.
Thank you.
-r-/!3arb «VJ ..2~ I -?~.:?._-OS3~-
t Am,'Y1'j
A.e/J-'l,I .s e, ,,:/-. j l'h y /Y1 o 'th e,, 8 a r 6 &(/1 '4
~l?a1/L ijt11""", '-tB~~
J. BUFORD KING
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MANAGER
FAIRHOPE PLANNING AND ZONING
161 NORTH SECTION STREET
FAIRHOPE ALA 36232
RE: FOX HOLLOW PHASE 3
DEAR BUFORD
I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A TWENTY FOUR MONTH EXTENSION ON THE FOX HOLLOW
PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT PERMITT. THE COVID-19 VIRUS HAS CREATED MUCH UNCERTAINTY
IN THE NATIONS ECONOMY AND PARTICULARLLY THE RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET.
I UNDERSTAND THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DECISIONS BY OTHERS AS WHEN
AND WHERE TO DEVELOPE LOTS. ON THE OTHER HAND, WE HAVE WORKED EXTREMELY HARD
WITH TRULAND HOMES TO MAKE FOX HOLLOW LIVE UP TO THE REPUTATION OF OUR CITY.
I FEAR CHANGING OUR BUILDING PLAN AT THIS TIME WOULD LOWER THE BAR WE HAVE
STRIVED TO ACCOMPLISH.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
MONTROSE PROPERTIES INC.
CLIFF PITMAN
City of Fairhope
Planning Commission June 1, 2020
Discussion of various amendments to the subdivision regulations
Cover page amendment
Subdivision Regulations
Adopted March 8, 2007
Last amended XX, 2020
Article II Definitions
Lot:a parcel of land intended as a unit for
transfer of ownership or for building
development, or both, which fronts upon a
public right-of-way, exclusive of any part
of the right-of-way. Designation of land
as a tax parcel by the Baldwin County
Revenue Commissioner does not establish
a lot of record within the meaning of these
regulations.
Article IV Pre-Application and Sketch Plat
1.Pre-application Conference and Community Meeting
a.Pre-Application Conference –All applications for major subdivisions, village subdivisions and Multiple Occupancy Projects
must attend a mandatory pre-application conference with City staff prior to making application so the developer may become
familiar with the comprehensive plan and other rules which may affect the development. A pre-application conference with the
Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent may be scheduled at the mutual convenience of both parties.
b.Community Meeting –After the pre-application meeting and prior to making application for a major subdivision, village
Subdivisions or Multiple Occupancy Project the applicant must conduct a community meeting to solicit public input.
i.Notice of Community Meeting –except as specified in (2) below. The applicant shall notify all persons owning
property adjacent to any specific property that is the subject of the application stating the date, time, location, nature
and subject of the meeting. The location of the meeting shall be at a public facility unless the location of the
development makes a public facility impracticable. Names and addresses shall be from the latest records of the county
revenue office and accuracy of the list shall be the applicant’s responsibility. Where land adjacent to the subject
property involves leasehold property, the names and addresses of the landowner and the leasehold improvements shall
be notified.
Upon application for a major subdivision,village subdivisions and Multiple Occupancy Projects,the following
community meeting information must be provided:
i.Copy of notice mailed to neighboring properties for the community meeting stating date, time, location, nature
and subject of the meeting.
ii.Copy of site plan or other descriptive information discussed
iii.Attendance sign in sheet.
iv.Meeting minutes
v.Written comments in lieu of attendance if provided
ii. Subdivisions preceded by the creation of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) are not required to conduct an additional
community meeting prior to submission of a subdivision preliminary plat.
Article IV Procedure for Plat Approval –Final Plat Requirements
Prior to expiration of preliminary plat approval, applicant may submit eighteen (18) copies of the
Final Plat to the commission staff for review and, if in compliance, placement on the commission
agenda.
1.Submission Requirements –The staff shall not place any proposed Final Plat on the agenda for
review until staff has received the following items:
a.Either a financial guaranty (in the form of a maintenance bond) in an amount and form acceptable
to the City Council as a guarantee for the installation of required improvements or the
determination of the City's General Superintendent that all required improvements have been
installed to the City's requirements.
b.Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article
IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information:
i.Location of all blocks and lots with numbers in final numerical order.
ii.Sufficient data to determine and to reproduce on the ground the location, bearing and length of
every road line, block line, boundary line, and building line, whether curved or straight, and
including the radius of arc, central angle, length of tangent and length of curve for the
centerline of all roads or streets and for all property lines. Dimensions shall be shown to the
nearest 1/100 foot and bearings to the nearest 15 seconds.
i.ESRI ArcMap Shapefiles including, but not limited to locations of: street centerlines,
sidewalk centerlines, curb lines (including back of curb), property corners, lot lines, and
edge of pavement.
Article IV Procedure Exceptions
1.Minor Subdivisions -For platting of four (4) or fewer lots, where there are no new
streets or rights-of-way, and no new utility mains required, or any other public
infrastructure (hereinafter “streets or infrastructure”), application for simultaneous
preliminary and final approval may be made to the Planning Commission. Submittals
shall in all other respects meet the minimum requirements of these regulations.
2.Replat -Lot line adjustments may be approved administratively by a Replat approved
by the Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent without review by the
Planning Commission, provided that no new lots are thereby created and that no lot is
reduced below the minimum size otherwise required by the provisions herein or by
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. A replat shall require the submission of a sketch
plat as specified in Article IV, Section B., except that the location and dimension of lot
lines, and existing facilities shall be exact. Additionally, a replat may be required by
the Planning Director to resolve discrepancies between lots of record and tax parcels
comprising multiple lots.
Article IV Procedure Exceptions
1.One-Time Split
a.A "one-time" split of a single lot/parcel into two lots may be approved administratively by the
Planning Director and/or his/her authorized agent without review by the Planning Commission,
provided that:
i.The lot or parcel existed and has not been divided since March 8, 2007. Sufficient
documentation of property status as of March 8, 2007 must be submitted.
i.No new streets or public infrastructure is required.
i.The resulting lots will be in compliance with all applicable provisions of these regulations, or
will be brought into compliance.
b. Submittals for “one time split” shall in all other respects meet the minimum requirements of these
regulations
c. Property underdoing a one-time split may not be subdivided for “x” years after such one-time split.
Article IV Multiple Occupancy Projects
5. PROCEDURE EXCEPTION For Multiple
Occupancy Projects which include four (4) or fewer units
and no new streets or public infrastructure is rights-of-way
and no new utility mains are required, application for
simultaneous preliminary and final approval may be made
to the Planning Commission. Submittals shall in all other
respects meet the minimum requirements of these
regulations.
Article V Approval Standards
B.2.e. Notwithstanding that the proposed subdivision may satisfy
the technical, objective provision of these regulations, the
Commission has discretion to deny a subdivision if there is any
articulable, rational basis for a determination that the proposed
subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, or welfare of
persons or property.within the planning jurisdiction of the City.
Article V Greenspace Standards Applicability and Requirements - The regulations in this Section C. shall apply to
any development, whether or not in the City Limits. Green Open Space amounts
to be provided shall be calculated based on the net density of a subdivision and
applied to the gross area of the subdivision to determine the required greenspace
for the subdivision. For the purposes of this section, net density of a site is the
resulting number of units per acre after removing public or private rights-of-way,
storm water infrastructure, wetlands, water course and undevelopable land based
on topography or physical constraints.
Units Per Acre Greenspace Open Space Amount
Less than 2 units per acre 10%
2-4 units per acre 15%
4-6 units per acre 20%
More than 6 units per acre 25%
Multiple Occupancy Project -Commercial
10%
Multiple Occupancy Project –RV Park,
Trailer Park, Mobile Home Park, Manufactured Home
Park, “Tiny Home” Development –to be discussed with
Planning Commission TBD
Multiple Occupancy Project -Residential
Less than 3 units per acre 10%
3 units per acre 15%
4-6 units per acre 20%
More than 6 units per acre 25%
4. Design Requirements -All eligible greenspace shall
conform to the following
a. Maximize public exposure and public access to
greenspace.
b. Streets shall align adjacent to greenspace.
c. Greenspace shall not be located adjacent to a collector
or arterial street, provided however, greenspace may be
located adjacent to, but outside any highway construction
setback lines.
d. Due regard shall be shown for all natural features such
as lakes, ponds, water courses, historic sites and other
similar features which, if preserved, will add
attractiveness and value to the property.
e. The amount, distribution and type of open space
provided shall be context sensitive with the built
environment around it.
f. Types of Open Space and Greenspace
The following Table 4-1 indicates the categories, types,
locations and general sizes of greenspace open space that
are to be used to meet the City requirements for
greenspace open space and greenspace.
Article V Planning Design Standards –Pedestrian Area Design Standards
6. Pedestrian Area Design Standards –All streets shall include a
pedestrian area comprised of a planting strip and a sidewalk, according
to the standards in Table5.3 in Appendix A.
The developer may have the flexibility to construct the
sidewalks within 2 years of final plat approval. A letter of credit
guaranteeing the construction for 125% of the engineer’s
estimate is required. At the end of 2 years, all sidewalks shall be
completed by either the developer or City, using the letter of
credit.
The areas in which the sidewalks will be poured shall be graded
and compacted at the time the subdivision infrastructure is
constructed.
Article V Planning Design Standards –Exceptions to Street Standards
(3) Cul-de-sacs or “loop” streets may be approved where
connections with a through street would intersect with the
natural or topographical feature. “Loop” streets are preferred
to cul-de-sacs wherever practicable. Cul-de-sacs shall not
exceed 660 feet and loop streets shall not exceed 1300 feet.
(4) Sidewalks
(a) Sidewalks are not required to be installed in the
right of way where all lots front on and have access to existing
streets or roads, and such streets or roads are under the
jurisdiction of another governing authority, and that authority
has prohibited the installation of sidewalks in the right of way.
In such event, the Commission may require the installation of
sidewalks in easements along the margin of the lots adjacent to
the right of way.
(b) If so requested, the Commission may waive the
requirement to install sidewalks if, in the discretion of the
Commission, sidewalks will not serve the intended purposes
due to the absence of other sidewalks in proximity to the
subdivision or due to topographical conditions. However, in
such cases the Commission may require sidewalk easements
along the margin of lots adjacent to the right of way to
accommodate the installation of sidewalks in the future.
Article V Planning Design Standards –Lot Standards
3. Lot Access –
a.Except in rural and agricultural subdivisions under as provided in
Section D.7(c) and (d), 6., all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly
maintained street,and be accessed via such frontage. The
Commission may, in its discretion, allow deviation from this
requirement where such frontage and access to each lot is
unattainable or unsafe due to unusual characteristics of the property
with respect to topographic or natural features, or the location of
existing roads or public infrastructure. In allowing such deviation the
Commission may require the creation of easements to provide for
safe and convenient access. Double frontage lots are prohibited,
except where lots consist of more than 66% of a block.
Article VI Construction Standards –Streets and Lanes
4. Wearing Surface shall consist of a surface course constructed with asphaltic
concrete. It shall be constructed in one layer, not less than an average weight of
one hundred fifty sixty five pounds per square yards at an average thickness of not
less than one and one half inches. Wearing surface shall conform to the lines,
grades, and typical cross sections shown on the Plans. A cross slope of not less
than one: quarter inch per foot shall be maintained from centerline to curb line.
Plant mix shall conform to state specifications for the type work.
Article VI Construction Standards –Sidewalks
Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the
planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on
those streets which are eligible for the rural design
standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these
regulations, or as elsewhere provided for in these
regulations.. On streets requiring sidewalks, concrete
sidewalks which meet the City's standards and
specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of
Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks
shall be designed and installed in accordance with good
engineering practice.
Article VI Construction Standards –Stormwater
9. ESRI ArcMap Shapefiles -Electronic ESRI
ArcMap shapefiles including but not limited to
locations of all storm drainage piping, structures,
inlets, ponds, swales, ditches, and any other forms
of stormwater storage, treatment, or conveyance.
Article VI Construction Standards –Permanent Monuments
Concrete Monuments four inches in cross section and three feet long,
with a flat top shall be set at all points where the exterior boundaries of
the subdivision intersect, including points of curvature and points of
tangency on curved boundaries. The top of the monument shall have an
"X" indented therein to identify the exact point and the top shall be set
flush with grade. All monuments and interior lot corners shall be marked
with a pipe not smaller than three-quarters inch diameter, 24 inches
length and shall be driven flush with finish grade as prescribed by the
most recent edition of the Alabama Society of Professional Land
Surveyors document Standards of Practice for Surveying in the State of
Alabama.
Article VI Construction Standards –Requirement to Complete Improvements
Sub-divider shall be responsible for providing all required minimum
improvements in the subdivision. This may be accomplished either by:
1.Full installation of such improvements before the Final Plat is submitted to the
Planning Commission for approval, or;
2.After 90% substantial completion of the total cost of the infrastructure, which
must include:
a.Installation of all asphalt wearing surfaces;
b.Installation of all storm water pipes, culverts, curbs, gutters,
detention/retention ponds, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, and
all other drainage infrastructure;
c.Installation of all electrical, water, and sanitary sewer utility mains; and
d.Installation of all sidewalks in all common areas and installation of at least
90% of sidewalks in all other areas in the public right of way,
Article VI Construction Standards –Requirement to Complete Improvements
The subdivider may provide to the City a financial guarantee of
performance in the form of either a performance bond or a Letter of
Credit for the 10% of improvements remaining to be installed based
upon a schedule of values submitted by the Engineer of Record included
with the request for Final Plat approval. Any such performance bond
shall be in form and substance acceptable to the Planning Commission,
with oblige riders in favor of the City in the event the bond issued in the
name of the subdivider’s contractor, and shall be issued by a surety that
is licensed to do business in the State of Alabama and having a Best
rating of A-or better. In the event that the subdivision lies within the
extra-territorial jurisdiction, such guaranty shall be made jointly payable
to the City of Fairhope and Baldwin County,Alabama. The surety and
the form and amount of such financial guaranty shall be subject to
approval of the City and/or County.
Article VI Construction Standards –Requirement to Complete Improvements
Sub-divider shall be responsible for providing all test reports, inspection videos, and
ESRI ArcMap Shapefiles including but not limited to the following:
1.Submission of all roadway and drainage-related test reports and inspection videos as
required by Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances stamped by a
licensed professional engineer in the State of Alabama and including the engineer’s
stamp and statement certifying the roadway construction meets the requirements of the
project plans.
2. Submission of ESRI ArcMap Shapefiles are required by Article IV Section D. and Article VI. Section E.
3. Submission of all utility-related test reports, inspection videos, and ESRI ArcMap Shapefiles as
required by Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water
Facilities with reports stamped by a licensed professional engineer in the State of Alabama and
including the engineer’s stamp and statement certifying the utility services constructed meets the
requirements of the project plans.
Article VII Wavier Standards
A. Except where these regulations elsewhere provide for a wavier as to a specific
matter, waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the
following conditions exist:
1.An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due
to unusual topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not
generally applicable to other land areas.
1.The condition is beyond the control of the sub-divider.
2.The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the
regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan.
3.The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve
the hardship;
4.The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future
landowners, or the public;
5.The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done.