Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-05-2019 Planning Commission Agenda PacketKarin Wilson ,1/qyor Council Members Kevin G. Boone Robert A. Brown Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Co nyers Jay Robinson Li sa.'.. Han ks, MMC Ci()'CiCrk Michael V. Hinson, CPA City Treasurer J 6 1 North Section Street P 0. Drawer 429 Fairhope, Alabama 36533 25 I -928-2136 251-928-6776 Fax \1~1~v. Fairhopeal.gov 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes City of Fairhope Planning Commission Agenda 5:00 PM Council Chambers September 5, 2019 • August 5, 2019 3. Consideration of Agenda Items: A. SD 19.32 Public hearing to consider the request of Edward Loper and Jonathan McMurray for plat approval of South Section Estates, a 4- lot minor division. The property is located on the west side of Section Street just south of Twin Echo Court. B. SD 19 .33 PPIN #: 18512 Public hearing to consider the request of LA Development, LLC for Final plat approval of Pinewood, Phase 2, a 18-lot subdivision. The property is located on the south side of Manley Road between Saddlewood Subdivision and the City of Fairhope Soccer Complex . PPIN #: 230553 C. SD 19.34 Public hearing to consider the request of The Teachers Retirement Systems of Alabama for Final plat approval of Polo Place, a 3-lot subdivision. The property is located on the north side of Polo Ridge Blvd. just west of S. Section Street. PPIN #: 25387 D. SD 19.35 Public hearing to consider the request of Keith Glines for plat approval of Glines Subdivision, a 4-lot minor division . The property is located on the north side of Bishop Road between County Road 13 and S. Greeno Road. PPIN #: 208295 E. SD 19.36 Public hearing to consider the request of Baldwin 4, LLC for site plan approval of Fairhope Hardware MOP, a 6-unit multiple occupancy project. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Fairhope Avenue and Church Street, at 301 Fairhope Avenue . F. UR 19.20 PPIN #: 14359 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 650 linear foot of underground fiber optic cable. The project will run throughout the Twin Beech Estates subdivision. 4. Old/New Business • ZC 19 .08 Greeno Road Corridor Overlay Districts 5. Adjourn 1 SD 19.32 South Section Estates – September 5, 2019    Planning Commission  September 5, 2019  Subdivision Approval  Case:  SD 19.32 South Section Estates    Project Name:  South Section Estates    Property Owner /Applicant:  Reid Loper and Cade McMurray    General Location:  On the west side of South Section  Street approximately 500’ north of  Twin Echo Court.      Project Type:  Minor Subdivision inside  Fairhope’s ETJ    Number of lots:  4    Project Acreage:  Approx. 4.5    Zoning District:  Unzoned    PPIN Number:  18512    Engineer of record:  Seth Moore, PLS  Moore Surveying, Inc.    School District:  Fairhope Elementary, Intermediate, Middle, and High School     Report prepared by:  Mike Jeffries, QCI  City Planner    Recommendation:  Approve       -~It.-! Ct'TV OF i.llAHOPE ZONING , ...... ~ T'I.J..all.-. II_.AH_,11111 1"!1_.D.-u 11., .... 0...,,..,.....,.0U) -1111~ t-2v~•C....i:,1~ ... -llt..J"Olla.,,v,~_,, ll..S901111t~!.'tf'thOll'lt □•..1:r .. ,._ .. 1,,..,..,, -fl..-\_0..,,•')'liil.,t;l•""'r fl4 "9'1c.,~o.,,.. ~-- :ii--t: 11ldil"-"a11 ei.,.. ---1~$,._.,,.C_ --.zo......,..,.,._ci_ -~T-illHM~ftl'-11 -I-..JI T-.a.,_c---.SM>.eaU.- _._. 11.1 •11na_ltrt....._.Cl.e.d v ,,u""'......., Cl~ .... ,, ...... •ua,...,_,,u,,•~_,.,,."' I □,~t,.,t~ M -1 • Li g ht Indus t ri al Di s tric t 2 SD 19.32 South Section Estates – September 5, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Reid Loper and Cade McMurray owners and applicants for a 4‐lot  minor subdivision. The property is located on the west side of South Section Street approximately 500’ south  of Twin Echo Court. The subject property is approximately 4.5 acres.     Comments:  The subject property is not zoned by the City of Fairhope but is in Fairhope’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction and therefore  must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision  Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly.     The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a  tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable.  The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing  flow patterns will be changed by this replat. The proposed subdivision exceeds the minimum lot width and  size and provides the appropriate easements and setbacks.    The new lots will be serviced by Fairhope utilities Water, Gas, Sewer, and Power. Riviera has a single phase  line in the vicinity of the 4 lots. A mutual agreement between the City of Fairhope and Riviera gives the right  to the City of Fairhope to serve power to all 4 lots.        The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards:  “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning  ordinance, where applicable;    Not applicable  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks  Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;    Not applicable  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;   Meets  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;  or   Meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”   Meets    Recommendation:  Staff recommends approval of SD 19.32    --- 1                                                                                                         SD 19.33 Pinewood, Phase 2 – September 5, 2019    Planning Commission     September 5, 2019    Final Plat     Case:  SD 19.33 Pinewood Phase 2     Project Name:  Pinewood Phase 2 Subdivision    Property Owner / Applicant:  Matt Byrne and Todd Booth  General Location: South side of            Manley Road between Saddlewood   Subdivision and the City of Fairhope  Soccer Complex.    Project Type:   Major Subdivision     Number of lots:  18 Lots    Project Acreage: 7.42 Acres    Zoning District:   R‐2 Medium Density Single Family    PPIN Number:                                           230553 (parent parcel)    Engineer of record:                                 Sawgrass Consulting, LLC.  Doug Chaffin, PE     School District:  Newton Elementary School  Fairhope Middle School   Fairhope High School    Report prepared by:     J. Buford King,                                            Development Services Manager     Recommendation:  Approval with conditions    CITY OF FAIRHOPE ZONING R--A Res.Clenlll l I AOdOJlliJre OIMnct R.1 LowOenscy Single--Fam l y J Rl(a ) ETI'J Rl(b) Rl(cj R.2 r.-edtim DenslryS.-iOJt...fami~ -R-3 H~n Denuy Slngle-Fam l y R·3 PCt-1 PaUoJCarden Srl9le F11m l y D R-3 TH Tav.nhouse Sil.gle Famly 1111 R.-A LGW Dertsiy M uli.f arnll)' R-5, Hlgfl OenslyOV".ell'l9 Rnlden.tia1 R-6 r.coMeHomePar'lc"Olstnd L...1-f-'---i-....... 1-..J..L..J....L...LLJ....L...L.LJ___.:l<'.... __ -l--___ "T""_"""T_-,-~ -e. I Local Shopp,og Disll1C! B-2 Ge11era1 Business OISuta -11-Ja T°"'" Re son Loo;~ 9 Dis111a 1111 B-3b Tounsr Reson Commeroal Sesvke Clstnd 1111 B-AI 8ulilnflssandProlli!!s~onalDiatrid L!•1 Llgl'lllndustfl:al Oistrict -P-1 P1;,.~9 POO Planned Un~ OeYelopment 2                                                                                                         SD 19.33 Pinewood, Phase 2 – September 5, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Sawgrass Consulting, LLC for Final Plat  Approval of Pinewood, Phase 2, an 18‐lot subdivision.  The property is located on the south side of Manley  Road between Saddlewood Subdivision and the City of Fairhope Soccer Complex.      The property owner is LA Development, LLC (Mr. Matt Byrne and Mr. Todd Booth).  Mr. Doug Chaffin, PE, of  Sawgrass Consulting, LLC is the applicant’s representative and engineer of record (EOR).  The subject  property is approximately 7.42 acres and 18 lots are proposed.   The largest lot is approximately 12,617 sq.  ft. and the smallest lot is approximately 10,500 sq. ft.        Site History  The subject property is approximately 7.42 acres situated between multiple subdivisions and the City of Fairhope  Soccer Complex.  The subject property is an open field with the topography generally flat with some gentle fall to the  east.        Topographic View of Subject Property    Aerial View of Subject Property       The applicant previously submitted case number ZC 18.05 requesting conditional annexation to R‐2 medium  density single family zoning district for subject property.  Case # ZC 18.05 was approved during the Planning  Commission meeting on May 7, 2018 and approved by the Fairhope City Council on November 26, 2018.    The original arrangement of Pinewood Subdivision is located to the north of the subject property and  consists of 6 lots fronting on Manley Road, which are unzoned and lot 7 is the remnant parcel resulting from  the previous Pinewood subdivision case.  Though subject application is identified as “Pinewood Phase 2”  subject application is technically the “Resubdivision of Lot 7 of Pinewood Subdivision” and is not necessarily  a formal “phase of development” but a Resubdivision of Lot 7.  “Pinewood Phase 2” is the generally  accepted name of the Resubdivision of lot 7 so that subject application is more easily identified and  distinguished from the original Pinewood Subdivision application as well as surrounding developments.   Further, the Resubdivision of lot 7 functions as a second phase of development but must function within the  constraints created by the original Pinewood Subdivision.  The final plat correctly labels the development as  “Pinewood Subdivision Phase 2, a Resubdivision of Lot 7, Pinewood Subdivision, Phase 1”.     1./ i 14 105 I 14 !06 3                                                                                                         SD 19.33 Pinewood, Phase 2 – September 5, 2019  As stated previously the zoning district of subject development has been established as an R‐2 Medium  Density Single Family Residential Zoning District and includes the following dimension standards:     35’ front setbacks    35’ rear setbacks    10’ side setbacks     20’ street side setbacks    37% maximum lot coverage   30’ building height    Comments:   The following items are excerpts from the staff review of Case number SD 19.33.  Review comments have  been cured by the EOR’s responses to staff correspondence, and are noted in blue text, which may include  conditions of approval.        Article IV, Section C.1.b.(2) Name and Location of the Proposed Subdivision – The Baldwin County Revenue Commission has requested that subdivisions predating the current final plat request be more easily-recognizable. Under the “Pinewood Subdivision, Phase 2” label at the top of the plat, please include appropriate wording that indicates the subject plat is a Resubdivision of Lot 7 of Pinewood Subdivision. The title of the plat has been revised to reflect the subdivision of Lot 7.  Article IV, Section.D.1.a. Maintenance Bond – The Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement was not included with the Final Plat Application. Further, the numeric and written cost amounts listed on the bond do not match. Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement furnished as requested and the numeric and written cost estimates on the bond have been corrected.  Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(17 Maintenance Agreement for maintenance of detention facilities – Several sections are included in the O&M Plan and Agreement that are not applicable to subject application. (Including, but not limited to green roofs, permeable paving, etc.). Please reflect only applicable sections in the fully-executed O&M Plan and Agreement that is recorded. The O&M Plan and Agreement has been edited as requested and has been signed by the developer, and is ready to be recorded upon final approval of Case # SD 19.33.  Article V, Section D.6. Street Standards – Pedestrian Area Design Standards – Please reference Matt Byrne’s e- mail of September 20, 2018 regarding sidewalks in common areas. The sidewalks in common areas have not yet been installed. This item will likely be a condition of approval that precludes plat approval. The EOR’s follow- up correspondence indicates the site work contractor will install sidewalks in common areas before August 30, 2019. Due to the publication time of the staff report, the installation of sidewalks shall be a condition of approval, which may be removed upon verbal request by staff of the condition of approval is no longer required at the time of the Planning Commission meeting.  Article VI, Section.B.1.- B.4. Construction Standards – Jason Christian, PE, noted the pavement wearing surface was not in place at the time asphalt core samples were taken. Mr. Christian noted a final letter of approval will be issued when the core samples of the wearing surface were tested. The final letter of approval from Mr. Christian was not included with the application. The final letter of approval by the testing engineer was furnished as requested via follow-up correspondence.  Article V, Section.D.6.a.-g. Street Standards – Pedestrian Area Design Standards – please cross reference Right of Way Inspector Cody Johnson’s e-mail of August 9, 2019. Please address each item in this e-mail. Further, this review assumes, by virtue of the engineer’s certificate included with the as-built drawings, that the drainage system included with subject development is “as-built as-designed” as thus functioning properly. Due to the publication time of the staff report, all remaining punch list items shall be a condition of approval, which may 4                                                                                                         SD 19.33 Pinewood, Phase 2 – September 5, 2019  be removed upon verbal request by staff if the condition of approval is no longer required at the time of the Planning Commission meeting.  Article VI, Section G. Construction Standards-Fire Hydrants -the fire hydrant located at the east end of Silage Drive does not contain a blue reflective marker as required by this section. Due to the publication time of the staff report, the installation of sidewalks shall be a condition of approval, which may be removed upon verbal request by staff of the condition of approval is no longer required at the time of the Planning Commission meeting.   Site Photos:                         The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards. Address  each of these criteria with either a “meets” or “does not meet”.  If any of the criteria is not met, a denial  should be recommended.    “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  Looking northeast toward soccer complex  from eastern terminus of Dutch Road  Looking southeast toward soccer complex  from eastern terminus of Dutch Road  Looking west along Dutch Road toward Open  Field Drive   Looking northwest along Dutch Road toward  Open Field Drive  L____ __ I L___I --~ 5                                                                                                         SD 19.33 Pinewood, Phase 2 – September 5, 2019  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s  Zoning ordinance, where applicable;   meets  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a  Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;   meets  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;   meets  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and  regulations; or   meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”   Meets      Recommendation:  Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case # ZC 19.33, Pinewood Subdivision Phase 2, contingent upon the  following conditions:  1) Installation of sidewalks in common areas as described in “comments”, above.   2) Completion of punch lists items identified by the Construction Inspector via separate  correspondence and also as described in “comments”, above.  3) The warranty period of the sanitary sewer lift station shall not commence until start‐initial  start‐up of the lift station and upon approval of the Water and Sewer Superintendent.   4) Reflect “Silage Drive” in lieu of  “Dutch Road” as the street name on the final plat. If the  developer desires a street name change, that process may occur after the final plat process.    LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 8LOT 18LOT 17LOT 16LOT 15LOT 14LOT 13LOT 12LOT 11LOT 10LOT 9COMMON AREATOTAL ACREAGE = 1.09 ACRES± (47,480 S.F.±)DETENTION = 0.22 ACRES± (9,551 S.F.±)GREENSPACE = 0.87 ACRES± (37,897 S.F.±)COMMON AREA TOTAL ACREAGE = 0.91 ACRES± (39,457 S.F.±) DETENTION = 0.51 ACRES± (22,375 S.F.±) GREENSPACE = 0.40 ACRES± (17,424 S.F.±)11143 Old Highway 31 Spanish Fort, AL 36527818 N. McKenzie Street Foley, AL 36535Phone: (251) 544-7900Phone: (251) 970-7900CHECKED BY:SHEET:DATE:DRAWN BY:OFSCALE:NUMBER:REVISION:DATE:11MARCH, 20181" = 50'LA DEVELOPMENT, LLCFINAL PLATPINEWOOD SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 7, PINEWOOD SUBDIVISION, PHASE 17 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY BALDWIN COUNTY E.M.C. (ELECTRIC) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY BALDWIN COUNTY E.M.C., HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA. THIS THE DAY OF 2018. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE GAS THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY FAIRHOPE GAS, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ____ DAY OF -------2018. (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE WATER & SEWER THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY FAIRHOPE WATER & SEWER, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ____ DAY OF _______ , 2018. (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION THE WITHIN PLAT OF PINEWOOD SUBDIVISION, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, IS HEREBY APPROVED BY FAIRHOPE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS THE ___ DAY OF --------2018. PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, MA TT BYRNE, A MEMBER OF LA DEVELOPMENT, LLC. AND THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE PLAT, AND THAT I HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED AS INDICATED HEREIN, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSE HEREIN SET FORTH AND DO HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SAME UNDER THE DESIGN AND TITILE HEREON INDICATED; AND GRANT ALL EASEMENTS AND DEDICATE ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, WALKS, PARKS AND OTHER OPEN SPACES TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE AS NOTED TOGETHER WITH SUCH RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS NOTED BELOW OR ATTACHED IN A SEPARATE LEGAL DOCUMENT. DA TED THIS THE ___ DAY OF _______ _ WITNESS NAME AND TITLE CERTIFICATION BY NOTARY PUBLIC STA TE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN 2018. I, ----------~ A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BALDWIN IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA DO CERTIFY THAT WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION, APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED SAID INSTRUMENT AT THIS FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSE HEREIN SET FORTH. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL THIS THE 2018. NOTARY PUBLIC .C.R.f". .R.8,F. 0c.R.S. ----0 0::: 0 I.() .._,, 0::: Cl Cl _J w LL. z w 11.. 0 LEGEND CAPPED REBAR FOUND REBAR FOUND CAPPED REBAR SET PROPERTY LINE ~R.F.-FAIRHOPE TAX PARCEL # 05-46-D8-28-0-000-014.020 EDWARD JACKSON 106 OPEN FIELD DR FARHOPE, AL 36532 C.R.F.-EDS ~ I I I l _____ ~1 _____ J ______ L ----------,' I ml TELEPHONE PEDESTAL liIBl TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ~ SEWER VALVE F"c:> FIRE HYDRANT "' I><] WATER VALVE ENGINEERING -SURVEYING -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ' ' ~-R,F, EDS COMMON AREA SADDI...EWOOD HCl.4EOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC TAX PARCEL # 05-46-0B-28-0-000-014.011 20585 CTY RD 13 STE D FARHCPE, AL 36532 rC.IU.-HMR I SITE DATA NUMBER OF LOTS: 18 LOTS SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 75'X140' (10,500 S.F.) TOTAL AREA: 7.42 ACRES± PROPOSED ZONING: CITY OF FAIRHOPE, R2 SETBACKS: FRONT = 35 FEET REAR = 35 FEET SIDE = 10 FEET SIDE STREET = 20 FEET COMMON AREA TOTAL COMMON AREA = 2.00 ACRES± COMMON AREA FOR DETENTION = 0. 73 ACRES± COMMON AREA FOR GREENSPACE = 1.27 ACRES± (17%) GREENSPACE REQUIRED = 0.74 ACRES± (10%) OWNER LA DEVELOPMENT, LLC C/0 MA TT BYRNE 20040 HWY 181 FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER SAWGRASS CONSULTING, LLC 11143 OLD HIGHWAY 31 SPANISH FORT, AL 36527 SURVEYOR: ERCIL E. GODWIN, PLS ALABAMA LICENSE NUMBER f6621 ENGINEER: WILLIAM D. CHAFFI~, P.E. ALABAMA LICENSE NUMBER 32963 UTILITY PROVIDERS WATER -CITY OF FAIRHOPE SEWER -CITY OF FAIRHOPE ELECTRIC -BALDWIN EMC ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE - --,---, t----1 --.... ----.-..::---------1 -,__--, ---,__-----, r-. I\. VICINITY I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA HOLDING CERTFlCATE NUMBER HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE DESIGN HEREIN WHICH WAS DONE UNDER MY DIRECT CONTROL AND SUPERVISION AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND TO THE BEST OF MY BEUEF, CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FAIRHOPE SUBDMSION REGULATIONS AND TO All. OTHER RULES, REGULATIONS, LAWS, AND ORDINANCES APPLICABLE TO MY DESIGN. WIWAM D. CHAFFlN, PE PROJECT ENGINEER DATE GENERAL SURVEYOR'S NOTES: -- --MAP 11 GRAPmc SCALE ? ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch= 50 fl I I 1. SOURCES or INFORMATION USED TO FACILITATE THIS SURVEY WERE PREVIOUS SURVEYS BY THIS FlRM, SURVEYS BY OTHER FIRMS AND INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT. NO TITLE SEARCH, TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT WAS PERFORMED BY THIS FlRM. THERE MAY BE DEEDS or RECORD, UNRECORDED DEEDS, EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS or RECORD WHICH COULD AFFECT THE BOUNDARIES or THIS PROPERlY THAT WERE NOT FURNISHED AT TIME or SURVEY. 2. All. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE GRID NORTH AS DETERMINED BY RTK GPS AND REFERENCED 10 NADB3, N.JSAMA WEST STATE PLANE COORDINATES. I 3. I HAVE CONSULTED THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION ldAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 01003C07BOL, EFFECTM' JULY 17, 2007, AND HAVE FOUND THAT THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE ")("(UNSHADED), AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2:1 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD PLAIN. (REVIEW or THE PRELIMINARY DATA PROVIDED BY ADECA/(NIR FOR THE PROPOSED UPDATED FIRM SHOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERlY TO STILL BE WITHIN THE "X" UNSHADED ZONE) 4. FlELD WORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED OCTOBER, 2016 AND FEBRUARY, 201B. 5. All'( FLOOD ZONES GIVEN OR SHOWN ON THE FACE OF THIS DRAWING ARE SCALED FROM THE FEDERAL EMERCENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS (SCALED ONLY). 6. ALL LOTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING DRAINAGE AND l/TILITY EASEMENTS (UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREON): FRONT LOT LINES -15 FEET REAR LOT LINES -15 FEET SIDE LOT LINE -7.5 FEET SIDE LOT LINES ABUTTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY -15 Fm 7. A PROPERrl' OWNERS ASSOCL'\TION (PDA) IS REQUIRED 10 BE FORMED. THE PDA 15 REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ANY AND All. STORM WATER FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES LOCATED Ol/TSIDE OF THE ACCEPTED RIGHT-OF-WAY. B. THE GREENSPACE WILL BE A NATURAL OPEN SPACE/GREENWAY USABLE FOR RECREATION AND NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION. IT WILL INCLUDE FEW CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS EXCEPT FOR THOSE TO ENHANCE TRAVEL OR RECREATIONAL USE AND PR<MDE CONTINUITY THROUGHOL/T THE DEVELOPMENT. ALL REQUIRED GREENSPACE SHALL BE INDICATED AS A PUBLIC ACCESS AND USE EASEMENT. THE PROPERTY 15 NOT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE AND THAT THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE 15 NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE or ANY OR All. REQUIRED GREENSPACE. RECORD DESCRIPTION: LOT 7, PINEWOOD SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1, IS RECORDED ON SLIDE 2617-F, IN THE OFFlCE OF THE JUDGE OF PROBATE, BALDWIN COUNTY, Al/>BNIA I CERTIFY THAT ALL PARTS or THIS SURVEY AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS or THE STANDARDS or PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO THE BEST or MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. ERCIL E. GODWIN, PLS DATE ALABAMA LICENSE NUMBER 26621 PINEWOOD SUBDIVISION, PHASE 2 1                                                                           SD 19.34  Polo Place – September 5, 2019    Planning Commission  September 5, 2019   Subdivision Approval  Case:  SD 19.34 Polo Place                                                  Project Name:  Polo Place     Site Data:  Lot 1 – 0.43 acres +/‐  Lot 2 – 0.31 acres +/‐  Lot 3 – 0.33 acres +/‐    Project Type:  Final Plat Approval Request     Jurisdiction:  Fairhope Planning Jurisdiction    Zoning District:  Unzoned Baldwin County    PPIN Number:  25387 (Parent Parcel)    General Location:  Polo Ridge BLVD, 3/8 mile south  of Battles Road     Engineer:  Goodwyn, Mills, and Cawood      Owner:  Teacher’s Retirement System of  Alabama (RSA)    School District:  J. Larry Newton Elementary   School, Fairhope Middle and High  Schools     Recommendation:  Approval    Prepared by:   J. Buford King, Development  Services Manager     t N 1/ r ZON\r\C s~i;ima ~B-011111::iid --~•itr.n~9Qllfaf;1: , li!ff.fflC D_..:J .. "" '-flft~fl.t.&<-a -.,_.t!•NNiludt:1, .. ~ ...... 2                                                                           SD 19.34  Polo Place – September 5, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Goodwyn, Mills, and Cawood, Inc. (GMC) on behalf of the  Retirement Systems of Alabama (RSA) for a request for FINAL PLAT approval of Polo Place Subdivision, a  three‐lot major subdivision.  Subject property is located along Polo Ridge Boulevard approximately 1/10 mile  west of South Section Street, located within the City of Fairhope planning jurisdiction within unzoned  Baldwin County.  Subject property consists of approximately 13 total acres, with the new lot sizes as  indicated on the staff report cover page. Mr. Tim Lawley, PE of GMC serves as the engineer of record (EOR)  for subject application.  (This subdivision was submitted by Mr. Lawley prior to the acquisition of  Hutchinson, Moore, and Raugh by GMC).     Comments:   MAJOR SUBDIVISION CRITERIA  The following items are excerpts from the staff review of Case number SD 19.34.  Review issues have been  cured by the EOR’s responses to staff correspondence, and are noted in blue text, which may include  conditions of approval.        Article IV, Section.D.1.a. Maintenance Bond – The Maintenance and Guaranty Agreement is included, but not the bond itself. The EOR clarified via follow-up correspondence that RSA is “self-bonded” and does not obtain a surety for maintenance bond purposes. Should a maintenance issue occur, that maintenance issue will be self- cured by RSA. The Maintenance and Guaranty agreement’s dates of execution shall serve in lieu of the bond expiration date.  Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(18) Engineer’s Certificate – I have your engineer’s certificate in letter form; however, the subdivision regulations require the certificate to be on the plat and plans. (It can go on the cover page of a set of as-built drawings, but in this case, I’m asking that you place it and your PE stamp on the final plat, as well as on the one as-built drawing for the sake of simplicity). EOR’s PE stamp and certificate have been furnished as requested.  Article IV, Section.C.1.b.(8) Condition of approval “1” from Case number SD 19.13 – This condition of approval required Ductile Iron Pipe (DIPS) underneath Polo Ridge BLVD, which appears to have been correctly installed in the field as seen in the sewer inspection videos. Please revise the as-built plans and profiles to reflect DIPS as required. The EOR clarified via follow-up correspondence the sanitary sewer pipe placed under Polo Ridge BLVD was correctly installed using High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe, however that HDPE pipe was to be furnished in DIPS as far as sizing. The installed material and reference on the as-built drawings are both correct, which satisfies a condition of approval from the preliminary plat approval.  Article IV, Section.C.1.b.(15) Condition of approval “3” from Case number SD19.13 – please provide the topographic survey for file purposes. Furnished as requested.   The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. “Approval Standards”. Each of  these criteria is addressed below with either a “meets” or “does not meet” comment.  If any of the criteria is  not met, a denial will be recommended.      2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive  Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable;   meets  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive  3                                                                           SD 19.34  Polo Place – September 5, 2019  Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a  Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;   meets  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;   Plat 1 does not meet (lot size and lot width waiver submitted)   Plat 2 meets   d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;  or   meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or  property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.”   meets      Site Photos:                       Recommendation:  Staff recommends APPROVAL of Case number SD 19.34 Polo Place Subdivision FINAL PLAT.  Looking northeast toward subject property from Polo Ridge BLVD  Looking North from Polo Ridge BLVD           toward subject property  Looking northwest toward subject   property from Polo Ridge BLVD  Looking north toward common area          between Lot 1 and adjoining properties  E N G I N E E R S U R V E Y O R S S PROFESSIONAL No. 27403 N DESECILAMABALA SURV E Y ORS T UART L S MITH. · · · · · · · ” ” ”” ” ” ” ” ” NO. ----------------------B.7351 ;~:~) POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION I I \ I I I I / / ---- -------- / / / ---- / TAX PARCEL NO. 05-46-09-31-0-000-004.004 SMITH, MICHAEL & JUNE 2472-D PERDIDO BEACH BLVD ORANGE BEACH, AL LOT 60 POINT CLEAR STABLES PHASE ONE (SLIDE 2035 C&D) / , I / I , , I ___,,, I I ~I 1 i .; ~ 5/B" CRF (CA#568) 20.00· GRAPlilC SCALE ,0 0 ,o IN FEET ) I inch -30 It. S 89"09'11" E 108.24'(A) S 89"09'11" E 88.24' 15' DRAINAGE &: UTILllY EASEMENT ,-----------, I I 30' BUILDING SETBACK ,-----------------------7 I I TAX PARCEL NO. 05-46-09-31-0-000-001 .001 THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA 201 SOUTH UNION STREET MONTGOMERY, AL 36104 / 5/B" CRF I I S 89"10'54" E 90.00'(A) _______________________ (CAjl56B) TAX PARCEL NO. 05-46-09-31-0-000-004.003 DAVIS, PAUL & DAHLIA PO BOX 2211 FAIRHOPE, AL LOT 61 I I I ~ 1 I __ ,~DRAINAGE~ lJTILITY EASEMEN.!_ _ 7 ~< ~wll ii I I ~ I 30' BUILDING SETBACK I ~ -'1* ~II~ LOT 1 ~ I 111:1 -----------------------7, II ~ o O t:: f:; 0.43 ACRES ± G:i ~ ("I~ +l+I N ,,!JVl 18,949 S.F. ± 111: ~ I 111 : I uJ 0: ~ u: l,w 5I" F.F.E. ~ 58.00' "1 9 I I vo<oim ws ffilo:! a11 1lol I 3 1/1 POINT CLEAR STABLES PHASE ONE {SLIDE 2035 C&D) ~ ~ 5cn •1~ '"1§ §11 ~ I ~1 r r i~ ~ :! ~~ b ~I~ . I ~~ ~I ix xi I~ I b ~ dl"1 0 iol~ e1 r-:~1 ~ I~ !aJI • S 89"06'27" E 160.00"(A) o e :z ,,_1 :e, ~11 :§ LOT 2 ~! 1~ 1 , , _____ ,_._ ORAINAG!C_&_l!!lUlY ~E"E"' ______ 7 z I ·~"I ~ 1., I 1~ I ------------------------==IP I '"11~ 0.31 ACRES± ~I ,Id I-I %~~5~~ I I 01, !1 ll ~}:~.1 : 5 {i_5~• ai :~~: i: r ____________ JO' BUILDING~~Af.~-----------------J~ TAX PARCEL NO. 05-46-09-31-0-000-004.002 PIECZYNSKI, JAMES & MARY 17662 HITCHING POST CIRCLE FAIRHOPE, AL LOT 62 POINT CLEAR STABLES PHASE ONE {SLIDE 2035 C&D) 1 I 0"' 611 ~I:~ :e: 1~81 ~I I~ ,:,I~ I I »I 1 , 1· -1c I~ ;i;I r.: I 1, ~Lu 211111 LOT 3 t::ilie I I I :::, I(!) CII ....I I I I • I I z 0.33 ACRES ± " I I I 0 1 ~ 10 ~j=' I I I II I I ~1 wl I§ 14,528 S.F. ± 91'" I I [ I I b i1 i~ F.F.E. = 68.00' ~~ I L ______ _:l~_B':"~~-"-~~"-----J I L. _______ 30' BUILD<NG SETBACK ____ JI :, ~I [ 30' BUILDING SETBACK ~:1 I I : I I I ~ I ------------------------------------------ 1 I I I I I ~I ~ 15.00' I I I 1/1 P.O.B. l L _,~DRAINAGE~ UTILITY EASEMEN..!._ _ --,1 L 15' DRAINAGE&: UTILITY EASEMENT _j L , I SOUTHEAST _j_ ----- -- - - - - -I _____ 15 DRAINAGE Ile LJTILITY EASEMENT ______ _J 1/2" CRF CORNER I ---------1!YSIDEWAL~-EASEMENT ________ --t ---------------------------1---------------------------t., &£.CA#101) _____________ O~T-~2 I 20.00' I S 89.05,59 ,. E 95 00' 1D.OO S 89 _05 , • , 10' SIDEWALK EASEMENT -------tr/ N 89"17'50" W 109.64'(A) 5/B" CRF-4 CMS • 59 E 90.?0 • S 89'05'59" E 145.00' " 15.00' / N--,,,r'I',--W--w--W--W--(CA#56B)W--w--w--W--W--w--W--W--W--N 89"0559 W 365,QO'(A) -----1-~------------------ W • •--•--•--w--w--w--w--w--w--w--w--w--w- ..... " •·. . .. -: ........ POLO RIDGE BOULEVARD ------CENTERLINE --------------------(60' R.O.W, AS PER TAX PLAT) -------------------________ _ (VARIABLE R.O.W. AS PER SLIDE 2017 C&D) --------,s-p,w:_r_ ROAD--- ... --. ---------------------------,r •• ... • -------------------------------• • • • ,r . • • • "'· •••• ---1~RCP-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. BE 8 li'E I I I I I I I •-. .... ·. -· . .. (CcuRB ~ OWNER/DEVELOPER THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA 201 SOUTH UNION STREET MONTGOMERY, AL 36104 llattlcs l'oint Clear ... ------kc=,',,' l , .. ~ \,~~ 7 8 SITE DATA TAX PARCEL NO. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 05-46-09-31-0-000-001.001 TOTAL SITE AREA -1.21 ACRES± (52,497 S.F.±} TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS -3 SMAU.EST LOT -0.31 ACRES± (13,513 S.F.±) LARGEST LOT -0.43 ACRES± {18,949 S.F.±) DENSl1Y -2.48 UNrrs PER ACRE ZONING BALDWIN COUN1Y DISTRICT 17, UNZONED Cl1Y OF FAIRHOPE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAL GREENSPACE COMMON AREA 1 & 2 -0.12 ACRES± (5,502 S.F.±} GREENSPACE -10.5% ZONING REQUIREMENTS 30' FRONT SETBACK 30' REAR SETBACK 1 O' SIDE SETBACK 100' MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT THE STREET t!QIE: AS PER THE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION SETBACK ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR BALDWIN COUN1Y, AL, ACT NO. 94-572, THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 40' ALONG POLO RIDGE BLVD. DEDICATED EASEMENTS 7.5' UTILl1Y & DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL INTERIOR LOT LINES. 15' UTILl1Y & DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE SUBDIVISION PERIMETER SIDE AND REAR BOUNDARY LINES. RIVIERA UTILITIES HAS A DEDICATED 1 O' UTILl1Y EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE LOT LINES AND A 15' UTILl1Y EASEMENT ALONG ALL ROAD SIDE AND REAR LOT LINES. UTILITIES POWER SEWER WATER PHONE GAS -RIVIERA UTILITIES -FAIRHOPE WATER & -FAIRHOPE WATER & -AT&T -FAIRHOPE GAS SEWER SEWER GENERAL SURVEYOR'S NOTES LEGEND P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING (A) ACTUAL (R) RECORD DEED (P) PLAT OF RECORD (C) COMPUTED OTIF OPEN TOP IRON PIPE FOUND IPF IRON PIN FOUND CTIF CRIMP TOP IRON PIPE FOUND CRF CAPPED REBAR FOUND RBF 1/2" REBAR FOUND CRS 1/2" CAPPED REBAR SET STAMPED CA#604 CMF CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND CMS CONCRETE MONUMENT SET LS# LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR'S NUMBER CA/I CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER (DIST) DISTURBED (REF) REFERENCE CORNER SET ON LINE (UNR) UNREADABLE INST # INSTRUMENT NUMBER SECT. SECTION T-TOWNSHIP R-RANGE -0-POWER POLE E--GLN WIRE R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 FIRE HYDRANT _,,.. SIGN Im TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ~ ELECTRIC METER BOX ~ AIR CONDmONER ~ JUNCTION BOX (VAULT) EL/ELEV ELEVATION INV INVERT •~: ALL CORNERS ARE "CRS" UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. ; TELEPHONE BOX (VAULT) WATER METER ft SANITARY SEWER VALVE WATER VALVE l1)l GAS VALVE cr!I TRANSFORMER BOX )c( LIGHT POLE el CABLE TV BOX ~ ELECTRIC BOX ~ ELECTRIC PANEL l!1d' IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE @ STORM DRAIN MANHOLE CD TELEPHONE MANHOLE @ SEWER CLEANOUT e!I SEWER GRINDER PUMP el GREASE TRAP a,._ FLAG POLE ® GAS LINE SIGN MARKER & TELEPHONE SIGN MARKER £ WATERLINE MARKER £ FlBER OPTIC LINE MARKER (EX.) EXCEPTION -FO-UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE -OE-OVERHEAD ELECTRIC -BE-BURIED ELECTRIC LINE -UT-UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE -s-UNDERGROUND SEWER LINE -w-UNOERGROUND WATERLINE -G-UNDERGROUND GAS LINE -,V-UNDERGROUND TELEVISION '8 #-Bl' SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONS CMP CORRUGATED MITAL PIPE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CPP CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE 1 . 2. SOURCES OF INFORMATION USED TO FACILITATE THIS SURVEY WERE PREVIOUS SURVEYS BY THIS AND OTHER FIRMS, THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT, AND/OR OTHER RECORDED DOCUMENTS SHOWN HEREON. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. NO TITLE SEARCH, TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT WAS PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM. THERE MAY BE DEEDS OF RECORD, UNRECORDED DEEDS, EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH COULD AFFECT THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS PROPERTY THAT WERE NOT FURNISHED AT TIME OF SURVEY. FIELD WORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON 12/11/2018. All. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983, ALABAMA WEST ZONE; STATE PLANE GRID NORTH; DERIVED BY GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM OBSERVATION; ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES. ALL MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. STANDARD FEET. THE SURVEYED PROPER1Y IS LOCATED WITHIN AN AREA HAVING A ZONE DESIGNATION OF "X" BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA), AS SCALED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 01003C0756L, WITH A REVISED DATE OF IDENTIFICATION OF JULY 17, 2007, FOR COMMUNl1Y NO. 015000, IN BALDWIN COUN1Y, STATE OF ALABAMA. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED UNLESS SHOWN. ALABAMA ONE CALL WAS CONTACTED TO HAVE THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MARKED FOR LOCATION ON 12/D5/2018 {TICKET # 183391049). ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT MARKED AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED, BUT THE UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS THEY WERE MARKED IN THE FIELD. THIS IS A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR SUBDIVISION. THE SURVEYED PROPER1Y LIES WITHIN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION I r □ □ 0 DE BE BE e;B E--BE BE -G"-===-c .=:=::f --BE--BE--BE--BE--01!, -G-G-G- □ □ □ □ □ □ □ ----------,~-Rep~-.~~'=-,·\ BE--BE--BE--BE--BE--BE--BE--BE--BE--BE-e ,t..\_ E_8£_Bf_Bf -----------~p~ □ --□----□ ---□----□11 ~"CM; □----□ --□ --□ --r 1 1/2"0;F-~--~--~--~~R~~;SF:::~-- A PORTION OF TAX PARCEL NUMBER 05-46-09-31-0-000-001.001 LYING WITHIN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, BALDWIN COUN1Y, ALABAMA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 5/8 IRON REBAR WITH CAP {CA#568) AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 62 OF POINT CLEAR STABLES, PHASE ONE, AS SHOWN ON PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON SLIDE 2035 C & D IN THE OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF PROBATE RECORDS, BALDWIN COUN1Y, ALABAMA, SAID POINT ALSO LYING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF POLO RIDGE BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON SAID SLIDE 2035 C & D; THENCE RUN NORTH 00'19'48" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 200.01 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 89'09'11" EAST A DISTANCE OF 108.24 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 21'41'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.03 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'19'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 33.35 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'10'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE REVISION DATE ENGR. TAX PARCEL NO. 05-46-09-31-0-000-008.000 LAY, MARTHA ANN P.O. BOX 342 POINT CLEAR, AL HMR TAX PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. I 05-46-09-31-Q-QQQ-062.001 I 05-46-09-31-Q-QQQ-062.000 I McCANTS, RON & LATONYA McCANTS, CLAYTON 1 2810 BRENTWOOD DRIVE P.O. BOX 1032 BAY MINETTE, AL POINT CLEAR, AL HUTCHINSON, MOORE & RAUCH, LLC 2039 MAIN STREET DAPHNE, ALABAMA 36526 • TEL (251) 626-2626 (251) 626-6934 daphne@hmrengineers.com RUN SOUTH 00"19'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 50.05 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'06'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP {CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'19'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 100.21 FEET TD A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP {CA#604) ON SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN NORTH 89'05'59" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 365.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 1.21 ACRES, MORE OR LESS AND LYING WITHIN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, BALDWIN COUN1Y, ALABAMA. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL PARTS OF THIS SURVEY AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. STUART L. SMITH, PLS DATE ALABAMA LICENSE NUMBER 27403 *DRAWING IS INVALID WITHOUT SIGNATURE & SEAL OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR ,,11 ,,,, POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION ,,, ,,, ~ 0 ~ .•·········•. /,, I-~ ~ .•· ·•. ~ -.... ·-.. -FINAL PLAT --:5' -f \ -a. ~ . . ' . I r-CLIENT . . RSA . . ~ -t -. . -. . -. . --•,. -·· -..... co ~ .. .. ~ '• .. -.j-~ SCALE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SHEET / .......... ' // ,, ,, \\ ..... 1"=30' AUGUST 2019 TBS SLS 1 OF 11 11111111'' a,: 2 PROFESSIONAL No. 27403 N DESECILAMABALA SURV E Y ORS T UART L S MITH. E N G I N E E R S U R V E Y O R S S NO. REVISION POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA IS THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE PLAT, AND THAT I HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED AS INDICATED HEREIN, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSE HEREIN SET FORTH AND DO HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SAME UNDER THE DESIGN AND TITLE HEREON INDICATED; AND GRANT ALL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY USE AS NOTED TOGETHER WITH SUCH RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS NOTED BELOW OR ATTACHED IN A SEPARATE LEGAL DOCUMENT. DATED THIS THE ___ µAY OF ___ 20 THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA NOTARY FOR TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY I, ________________ THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY IN SAID STATE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT DAVID G. BRONNER, WHOSE NAME AS SECRETARY-TREASURER OF THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA, AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND WHO IS KNOWN TO ME, ACKNOWLIEDGED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY THAT, BEING INFORMED OF THE CONTENTS OF SAID INSTRUMENT, HE, AS SUCH SECRETARY-TREASURER AND WITH FULL AUTHORITY, EXECUTED THE SAME VOLUNTARILY FOR AND AS THE ACT OF SAID PUBLIC CORPORATION. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS THE NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ______ _ CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP STATE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BALDWIN DAY OF ____ 20 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA IS THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE PLAT, AND THAT I HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED AS INDICATED HEREIN, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSE HEREIN SET FORTH AND DO HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SAME UNDER THE DESIGN AND TITLE HEREON INDICATED; AND GRANT ALL EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY USE AS NOTED TOGETHER 'MTH SUCH RESTRICTIONS AND COVENANTS NOTED BELOW OR ATTACHED IN A SEPARATE LEGAL DOCUMENT. DATED THIS THE ___ µAY OF __ _ 20 THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA NOTARY FOR EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA STATE OF ALABAMA COUNrTY OF MONTGOMERY I, =~~=~=~~=====~~THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY IN SAID STATE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT DAVID G. BRONNER, WHOSE NAME AS SECRETARY-TREASURER OF THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA, AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND WHO IS KNOWN TO ME, ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY THAT, BEING INFORMED OF THE CONTENTS OF SAID INSTRUMENT, HE, AS SUCH SECRETARY-TREASURER AND WITH FULL AUTHORITY, EXECUTED THE SAME VOLUNTARILY FOR AND AS THE ACT OF SAID PUBLIC CORPORATION. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS THE ____ AY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ______ _ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY AT&T THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY AT&T HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNrTY, ALABAMA, THIS THE ___ _ DAY OF ------~ 20 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE WATER AND SEWER THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY FAIRHOPE WATER & SEWER, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA. THIS THE ___ DAY OF ______ 20 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY FAIRHOPE GAS THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY FAIRHOPE GAS, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA. THIS THE ___ DAY OF ______ 20 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE RIVIERA UTILITIES THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY THE RIVIERA UTILITIES, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA. THIS THE ____ DAY OF -----------20 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER THE UNDERSIGNED, AS COUNTY ENGINEER OF BALDWIN COUNrTY, ALABAMA, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS ___ DAY OF __________ 20 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE BALDWIN COUNTY E-911 ADDRESSING THE UNDERSIGNED, AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BALDWIN COUNTY E-911 BOARD, HEREBY APPROVES THE WITHIN PLAT FOR THE RECORDING OF SAME IN THE PROBATE OFFICE OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, THIS ___ DAY OF __________ 20 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION THE 'MTHIN PLAT OF POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION, BALD'MN COUNTY, ALABAMA, IS HEREBY APPROVED BY FAIRHOPE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION. THIS THE ___ DAY OF _______ 20 SECRETARY CERTIFICATION QF ENGINEER I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA HOLDING CERTIFICATE NUMBER 30859, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE DESIGNED THE WITHIN IMPROVEMENTS IN CONFORMITY WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND LAWS AND WITH THE PRINCIPALS OF GOOD ENGINEERING PRACTICE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I HAVE OBSERVED THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITHIN IMPROVEMENTS, THAT THE SAME CONFORMS TO MY DESIGN, THAT THE WITHIN IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AS INSTALLED AND THAT SAID IMPROVEMENTS ARE HEREBY RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA. TIMOTHY D. LAWLEY, P.E. AL. LICENSE #30859 DATE HMR HUTCHINSON, MOORE & RAUCH, LLC 0 POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION I-~ :5, FINAL PLAT ~ ~----------------------------------------------- DATE ENGR. 2039 MAIN STREET DAPHNE, ALABAMA 36526 • TEL (251) 626-2626 (251) 626-6934 daphne@hmrengineers.com 1 r-CLIENT ~ -t RSA ..... ~1-----------.-----------,.--------,.-------.-----------1 -.j-~ ..... a,: SCALE DATE N/A AUGUST 2019 DRAWN BY SLS CHECKED BY SLS SHEET 2 OF 2 E N G I N E E R S U R V E Y O R SS PROFESSIONAL No. 27403 N DESECILAMABALA SURV E Y ORS T UART L S MITH. · · · · · · · ” ” ”” ” ” ” ” ” NO. REVISION DATE ENGR. POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION HMR HUTCHINSON, MOORE & RAUCH, LLC 2039 MAIN STREET DAPHNE, ALABAMA 36526 • TEL (251) 626-2626 (251) 626-6934 daphne@hmrengineers.com OWNER/DEVELOPER THE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA 201 SOUTH UNION STREET MONTGOMERY, AL 36104 SITE DATA TAX PARCEL NO. 05-46-09-31-0-000-001.001 TOTAL SITE AREA -1.21 ACRES± (52,497 S.F.±} TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS -3 SMALLEST LOT -0.31 ACRES± (13,513 S.F.±) LARGEST LOT -0.43 ACRES± {18,949 S.F.±) DENSITY -2.48 UNrrs PER ACRE ZONING BALDWIN COUNTY DISTRICT 17. UNZONED CITY OF FAIRHOPE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION PROPOSED USE: RESIDENTIAIL GREENSPACE COMMON AREA 1 & 2 -0.12 ACRES± (5,502 S.F.±} GREENSPACE -10.5% ZONING REQUIREMENTS 30' FRONT SETBACK 30' REAR SETBACK 1 O' SIDE SETBACK 100' MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT THE STREET t!QIE: AS PER THE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION SETBACK ENABLING LEGISLATION FOR BALDWIN COUNTY, AL, ACT NO. 94-572, THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS 40' ALONG POLO RIDGE BLVD. DEDICATED EASEMENTS 7.5' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL INTERIOR LOT LINES. P.O.C. P.O.B. (A) (R) (P) (C) OTIF IPF CTIF CRF RBF CRS CMF CMS LS# CA# (DIST) (REF) (UNR) INST # SECT. T- R- l'oint Clear ···--···-kc=,',, ' l , .. ~ \,~~ 7 8 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ; TELEPHONE BOX (VAULT) POINT OF BEGINNING WATER METER ACTUAL ft SANITARY SEWER VALVE RECORD DEED WATER VALVE PLAT OF RECORD l1)l GAS VALVE COMPUTED cr!I TRANSFORMER BOX OPEN TOP IRON PIPE FOUND )c( LIGHT POLE IRON PIN FOUND el CABLE TV BOX CRIMP TOP IRON PIPE FOUND ~ ELECTRIC BOX CAPPED REBAR FOUND ~ ELECTRIC PANEL 1/2" REBAR FOUND ~ IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE 1/2" CAPPED REBAR SET STAMPED CA#604 ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND @ STORM DRAIN MANHOLE CONCRETE MONUMENT SET CD TELEPHONE MANHOLE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR'S NUMBER @ SEWER CLEANOUT CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER e!I SEWER GRINDER PUMP DISTURBED el GREASE TRAP REFERENCE CORNER SET ON LINE a,._ FLAG POLE UNREADABLE ® CAS LINE SIGN MARKER INSTRUMENT NUMBER & TELEPHONE SIGN MARKER SECTION £ WATERLINE MARKER TOWNSHIP £ FlBER OPTIC LINE MARKER RANGE (EX.) EXCEPTION 15' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE SUBDIVISION PERIMETER SIDE AND REAR BOUNDARY LINES. -0-POWER POLE -FO-UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINE E--GLN WIRE -OE-OVERHEAD ELECTRIC RIVIERA UTILITIES HAS A DEDICATED 1 O' UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE LOT LINES AND A 15' UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG ALL ROAD SIDE AND REAR LOT LINES. R/W R.O.W. 0 RIGHT-OF-WAY -BE-BURIED ELECTRIC LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY -UT-UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE FIRE HYDRANT -s-UNDERGROUND SEWER LINE UTILITIES POWER SEWER WATER PHONE GAS _,,.. SIGN -w-UNDERGROUND WATERLINE Im TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -G-UNDERGROUND GAS LINE -RIVIERA UTILITIES ~ ELECTRIC METER BOX -lV-UNDERGROUND TELEVISION -FAIRHOPE WATER & SEWER ~ AIR CONDmONER "8 #-Bl' SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONS -FAIRHOPE WATER & SEWER ~ JUNCTION BOX (VAULT) CMP CORRUGATED MITAL PIPE -AT&T ELEVATION RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE -FAIRHOPE GAS EL/ELEV INV INVERT CPP CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE •~: ALL CORNERS ARE "CRS" UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. GENERAL SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. SOURCES OF INFORMATION USED TO FACILITATE THIS SURVEY WERE PREVIOUS SURVEYS BY THIS AND OTHER FIRMS, THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT, AND/OR OTHER RECORDED DOCUMENrrs SHOWN HEREON. 2. NO TITLE SEARCH, TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT WAS PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM. THERE MAY BE DEEDS OF RECORD, UNRECORDED DEEDS, EASEMENrrs, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD WHICH COULD AFFECT THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS PROPERTY THAT WERE NOT FURNISHED AT TIME OF SURVEY. 3. FIELD WORK FOR THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON 12/11/2D18. 4. AUL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983, AILABAMA WEST ZONE; STATE PLANE GRID NORTH; DERIVED BY GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM OBSERVATION; ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES. ALL MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. STANDARD FEET. 5. THE SURVEYED PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN AN AREA HAVING A ZONE DESIGNATION OF "X" BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA). AS SCALED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. D1003C0756L. WITH A REVISED DATE OF IDENTIFICATION OF JULY 17, 2007, FOR COMMUNITY NO. 015000, IN BALDWIN COUNTY, STATE OF ALABAMA. 6. NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED UNLESS SHOWN. 7. ALABAMA ONE CAILL WAS CONTACTIED TO HAVE THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MARKED FOR LOCATION ON 12/05/2018 (TICKET # 183391049). ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT MARKED AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED, BUT THE UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS THEY WERE MARKED IN THE FIELD. 8. THIS IS A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR SUBDIVISION. 9. THE SURVEYED PROPERTY LIES WITHIN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF TAX PARCEL NUMBER 05-46-09-31-0-000-001.001 LYING WITHIN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, BALDWIN COUNTY. ALABAMA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 5/8 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#568) AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 62 OF POINT CLEAR STABLES, PHASE ONE, AS SHOWN ON PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON SLIDE 2035 C & D IN THE OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF PROBATE RECORDS, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA, SAID POINT ALSO LYING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF POLO RIDGE BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON SAID SLIDE 2035 C & D; THENCE RUN NORTH 00"19'48" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A DISTANCE OF 200.01 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 89"09'11" EAST A DISTANCE OF 108.24 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 21'41'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.03 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITIH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00"19'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 33.35 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'10'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00-19'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 50.05 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 89'06'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604); THENCE RUN SOUTH 00'19'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 100.21 FEET TO A 1/2 IRON REBAR WITH CAP (CA#604) ON SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN NORTH 89'05'59" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 365.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 1.21 ACRES, MORE OR LESS AND LYING WITIHIN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I HEREBY STATIE THAT ALL PARTS OF THIS SURVEY AND DRAWING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. STUART L. SMITH, PLS DATE ALABAMA LICENSE NUMBER 27403 *DRAWING IS INVALID WITHOUT SIGNATURE & SEAIL OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR ,,11 ,,,, POLO PLACE SUBDIVISION ,,, I// ~ 0 ~ .•·········•. /,, I-~ ~ .•· ·•. ~ -.... ·· .. -FINAL PLAT --:5 ........ -f \ -a. ~ . . . . I r,.. CLIENT . . RSA . . ~ -t -. . -. . -. . --•,. .•· -r,.. co ~ .. .. ~ '• .. -.j-~ SCALE DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SHEET ,, •••····••• ' // ,, ,, \\ r,.. 1"=30' AUGUST 2019 TBS SLS 1 OF 11 //111111 1' a,: 2 1 SD 19.35 Glines Subdivision – September 5, 2019    Planning Commission  September 5, 2019  Subdivision Approval  Case:  SD 19.35 Glines Subdivision    Project Name:  Glines Subdivision    Property Owner /Applicant:  Keith Glines    General Location:  The property is located on the  north side of Bishop Road  between County Road 13 and  S. Greeno Road.    Project Type:  Minor Subdivision inside  Fairhope’s ETJ    Number of lots:  3    Project Acreage:  5    Zoning District:  Unzoned    PPIN Number:  208259    Engineer of record:  Dewberry Engineers Inc.    School District:  J Larry Newton, Fairhope Middle,  Fairhope High School    Report prepared by:  Mike Jeffries, QCI  City Planner     Recommendation:  Approve with conditions       Subject Property Le;.r1d !-------...1.--+---.r---.... ---..----J...-----~---l-s.j!IO•Al'(al :==:;::::::::::============~======~==~:='.::::::::I C::tTY Of' .FAl!UtO"f. ZONmO Zonhg 11_.llua.Mll"t._tk,_, 1.,....-... 10......,,.,.._,,,...l ... 11f1u 11/Q a,,tw..,..~~t~ -Jl-l ~pCI~~--, l .:Jl"l:l"'l'~8el!S_,.h•I)' 0 .... 1 .... '-'-•!nfl•'-tf -ll,...fl.twO-r,.koltJ •-r 111-$"_.0--,.u,Cl;,,;i;fot,-.,. 11,41,1_..,._tl.MCI..,._ ---•IM"'i ...... c- 2 SD 19.35 Glines Subdivision – September 5, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Keith Glines owner and applicant for a 3‐lot minor subdivision. The  property is located on the north side of Bishop Road between County Road 13 and S. Greeno Road near the  Fairhope Airport. The subject property is approximately 5 acres and the applicant wishes to divide the  property into three residential lots with one common area around the existing lake. The applicant has  provided a letter from Baldwin County exempting it from the County’s Subdivision Regulations.     Comments:  Baldwin County has an exemption in their regulations for family subdivisions if a certain criteria is met. The  City of Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations does not recognize this exemption. The subject property is in  Fairhope’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction and therefore must follow Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations. The  proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been  reviewed accordingly. The applicant has received approval for this subdivision, and it meets the County’s  requirements for the family exemption which includes that “Each parcel shall have its own ingress/egress  and utility access of not less than 30 feet in width”. Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations Article V Section E.3.a  states that all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly maintained street. The proposed subdivision does not  front on a paved, publicly maintained street and the applicant has requested a waiver.    The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any infrastructure or improvements therefore a  tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable.  The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Concerning storm water runoff none of the existing  flow patterns will be changed by this replat. The lots will be serviced by private wells for water and septic  tanks for sewer. Power is supplied by Riviera Utilities.    The subdivision is in the Airport Overlay Zone and it is noted on the plat.    Waiver Request:  Article V Section E.3.a states “except as provided in Section D.6., all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly  maintained street. Double frontage lots are prohibited, except where lots consist of more than 66% of a  block”.  The applicants wish to subdivide the property utilizing a 30.02’ ingress/egress & drainage/utility easement to  access lots 1, 2, & 3 as approved by Baldwin County for an Exempt Family Subdivision. They have requested  a waiver from this requirement and provided documentation for why it is necessary. (Letter attached)    A. WAIVER STANDARDS: (Staff response in red)  Waivers may be granted where the Planning Commission finds that the following conditions exist:  1. An extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with these regulations due to unusual  topographic or other physical conditions of the land or surrounding area not generally applicable to other  land areas.   ‐ The waiver standards contemplate more, areas that are currently zoned. Therefore, an extraordinary  hardship requirement based on unusual topography or physical characteristics for this site is not  appropriate. The hardship would be the crossing of jurisdictions between the City of Fairhope and Baldwin  County. The parcel being divided is also landlocked between other parcels with its only access being an  easement to Bishop Road.  2. The condition is beyond the control of the sub‐divider.   ‐ Not applicable for this individual case.  3. The requested waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the purpose and intent of the regulations,  the Zoning Ordinance, or the Comprehensive Plan.  3 SD 19.35 Glines Subdivision – September 5, 2019   ‐ The subject property lies outside of the corporate limits of Fairhope therefore, nullifying this  standard. Any building or land disturbance would have to permitted through Fairhope’ Building Department.  4. The waiver is the minimum deviation from the required standard necessary to relieve the hardship;   ‐ The minimum deviation of the requested waiver from each lot fronting upon a paved, publicly  maintained road is compliance with Baldwin County’s requirement of a minimum of 30’ ingress/egress  easement. This is a continuation of an existing easement providing access to Bishop Road.  5. The waiver shall not have an adverse effect on adjacent landowners, or future landowners, or the  public;   ‐ The proposed subdivision is a family subdivision and the lots have access via an easement that is  required by Baldwin County and will not have an adverse effect.  6. The waiver is necessary so that substantial justice is done.    ‐ Staff is neutral on this standard. There is not substantial justice to be done. This is a jurisdiction  difference and Baldwin County whom will have final jurisdiction has approved the subdivision with the  32.03.’ easement.    The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards:  “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning  ordinance, where applicable;    Not applicable  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks  Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;    Not applicable  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;   Meets  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;  or   Meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”   Meets    Recommendation:  Staff recommends approval of SD 19.35 conditional upon the following:  1. Recommendation of approval of Waiver request from the Subdivision Regulation Article V Section E.3.a be  approved.  2. Amend general note 1 on the plat to also reflect a 15’ rear utility easement per Riviera Utilities  requirements.  --- 1                                                                                                               SD 19.36 Fairhope Hardware MOP – September 5, 2019    Planning Commission     September 5, 2019    Multiple Occupancy Project Approval    Case: SD 19.36 Fairhope Hardware MOP Project Name:  Fairhope Hardware MOP    Property Owner /Applicant:  FSTC/Baldwin 4, LLC    General Location:  Northeast corner of Fairhope  Avenue and North Church Street  at 301 Fairhope Avenue    Project Type:  Multiple Occupancy Project    Number of units:  6    Project Acreage:  .20 acres    Zoning District:  B‐2 General Business District  Inside the Central Business District    PPIN Number:  14359    Engineer of record:  Larry Smith   S.E. Civil Engineering and Surveying    Report prepared by:  Mike Jeffries, QCI  City Planner     Recommendation:  Approve with conditions    I i i J 5 04 _j_. ____________ _ 3 5 f '3 Subject Property t.ev•nd -~·--ClfV OF FAUU·IOPE ZONrUO ,_ ... ~1ll1--II:__, 11 .. ~1,Uillllall .... .,._.Da" ■.,~o.,_.,,~,-. •-=Q-•-ci....,, _w..,-11 .. -~~ • ...,."-"--c.~s.-.c,-111 1 • ...,. .,.--~o- •"·• up-.....iio .. io ........... ·~ L:J I 5cu:, ~ N 2 _50 1 ~I t 2503 2                                                                                                               SD 19.36 Fairhope Hardware MOP – September 5, 2019      Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of S.E. Civil on behalf of Baldwin 4, LLC owner and applicant for a six‐ unit Multiple Occupancy Project approval. The project is remodeling an existing historic building to house up  to six units. The property is located at the northeast corner of Fairhope Avenue and North Church Street at  301 Fairhope Avenue. The subject property is .20 acres.     Comments:  The proposed project is a multiple Occupancy Project (MOP) which falls under Fairhope’s Subdivision  Regulations. An MOP is not a traditional subdivision requiring the division of property into separate lots but  rather uses one property to accommodate multiple units. Therefore, not all requirements for preliminary  and final plat approval are applicable. Every MOP is unique in its design and function and are reviewed  accordingly. This project is also located in the Central Business District Overlay allowing for different  standards and requirements.     The proposed project is working to retain the historical standing of the current structure. The majority of the  work on the outside is to restore the original façade and the intent for the remodel work on the inside is to  convert the space into two floors. The bottom floor is to be used for commercial/retail and the second floor  is to be used for office space in accordance with Fairhope’s current Comprehensive Plan. The request is for a  total of 6 units. The current intent is to have 4 units on the bottom floor and 1 unit on the second floor. The  tenants are not known at this point and the request for six units allows for the possibility to split the second  floor into two office units if needed.      Below is an exert from a checklist used to review the application and is also noted as a condition of approval.                      Article IV, Section C.6. a. and b. Expiration and Revocation 6. Expiration and Revocation - a. Any substantial deviation from the approved submittals during construction or failure to provide for traffic control, safety, environmental protection controls and/or best management practices and restoration of the site shall be grounds for the immediate suspension of the Preliminary Plat Approval and/or issuance of a stop work order. The Planning Commission shall have the power to reinstate Preliminary Approval when it is satisfied that conditions resulting in suspension have been mitigated. b. If a final plat is not submitted within two years or less after preliminary approval has been given, the preliminary approval shall expire and the preliminary plat shall be null, void and of no force or effect. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: For the applicant’s information please note the expiration and revocation requirements above. Though subject project is an MOP and does not require separate approval of a final plat, the requirements of paragraph “a” are a condition of approval. 3                                                                                                               SD 19.36 Fairhope Hardware MOP – September 5, 2019    Additional Comments:  ‐ Parking and greenspace are not required subject property is in the CBD  o No dwelling units to require parking  o Preexisting building and CBD require build to lines to the right‐of‐way line  ‐ Sidewalk widths are met  ‐ Storm water and drainage is to remain the same and drain via sheet flow to the alley. Improvements to  the gutter system are being made to bring the water to ground level. Currently dropping down the wall.    ‐ Adequate utilities can be provided. Fairhope will service the building with water, electric, and sewer. Gas  is available but not desired for the proposed project and not being designed for it at this time.  o Applicant is working with all utilities for placement of meters and areas where service is available  from the right‐of‐way.  o Locations will be finalized during the Building Permit Review and checked for building code  compliance.  ‐ The applicant, Richard Peterson Director of Operations, and Richard Johnson Public Works Director are  working together to coordinate this project with City projects in the vicinity.     Approval Standards  Address each of these criteria with either a “meets” or “does not meets”.  If any of the criteria is not met, a  denial should be recommended.     “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning  ordinance, where applicable;   meets  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks  Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;   meets  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;   meets  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;  or   meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”   meets    Recommendation:  Staff recommends approval of SD 19.36 Fairhope Hardware MOP with the following conditions:  1. Article IV, Section C.6. a.  Expiration and Revocation   a. Any substantial deviation from the approved submittals during construction or failure to provide for  traffic control, safety, environmental protection controls and/or best management practices and  restoration of the site shall be grounds for the immediate suspension of the Preliminary Plat Approval  and/or issuance of a stop work order.  - ---- TRASH CANS TO BE ALONG ALLEY SCREENED BY BUILDING WALLS 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY PAVED STREET PARKING EXISTING BUILDINGCONCRETE WALK"X" Marked on Brick CONCRETE CURB BRICK WALK 20' ALLEY PAVED ALLEY FAIRHOPE AVENUE WOOD DECK WITH ROOFPARKINGCHURCH STREET66' RIGHT-OF-WAYPAVED STREETNORTH 125.0'SOUTH 125.0'EAST 70' EDGE OF A S P H A L T WEST 70.0' EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMODELED HVAC UNITS ON ROOF 8.2'8.0' EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING BRICK PAVER SIDEWALK PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED COURTYARD 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE SHEET C01 20190516 GPW DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 7/23/19 1"=10'SEALAFFIXREVISIONDATER Know what's below. before you dig.Call SITE PLAN & PEDESTRIANCIRCULATIONCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. TO ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR SITE WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED TO BE TRUE AND ACCURATE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. THE SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS IS SHOWN WITHIN THESE PLANS. ALL EXISTING THIS SITE IS ZONED B-2 (CBD) (CITY OF FAIRHOPE). NOTIFY CITY OF FAIRHOPE INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF EVERY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED GOVERNMENTAL A COPY OF THE APPROVED LAND DISTURBANCE PLAN AND PERMIT SHALL BE PRESENT ON SITE WHENEVER LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKINGS USED ON THE SITE WILL CONFORM WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), FHWA, LATEST EDITION. REFERENCE THE SIGN CODES CONTAINED IN THE MUTCD FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. NOTE THE COLOR AND SIZE OF ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS, REFERENCING DETAILS IN ALDOT'S ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE. SITE PLAN NOTES REGULATIONS AND CODES AS WELL AS O.S.H.A. AND ALDOT STANDARDS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE SITE; INCLUDING UTILITIES, SURFACES, ETC. AND SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES THEY CAUSE TO NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY AND ANY UNAUTHORIZED DISRUPTION TO UTILITIES ON SITE AND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING UTILITIES AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS AND CROSSINGS SHALL BE FIELD EXCAVATED TO VERIFY LOCATIONS, ELEVATION AND SIZE. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DEVIATIONS OR CONFLICTS. TOTAL SITE ACREAGE = ±0.20 ACRES. INSPECTIONS. SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. PROPOSEDEXISTING SITE PLAN LEGEND TRAFFIC CONTROL ARROW CURB & GUTTER STANDARD PARKING QUANTITY MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVING X" SYSL - X" WIDE SINGLE YELLOW SOLID LINE X" DYSL - X" WIDE DOUBLE YELLOW SOLID LINE X" SWSL - X" WIDE SINGLE WHITE SOLID LINE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE CONCRETE PAVING PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVING HEADER CURB RIBBON CURB BUILDING (UNDER ROOF) SITE ANALYSIS 7,474 SF SITE ACREAGE (PROPOSED) ±0.20 AC (8,737 SF) BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: SIDE YARD: REAR YARD: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 0 FT 0 FT 0 FT 40' BUILDING HEIGHT ±30 FT PROVIDED PARKING 0 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING 0 SPACES MAX. GROUND COVERAGE RATIO:N/A JURISDICTION FAIRHOPE PERVIOUS AREA 0.00 AC (0.0%) IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.20 AC (100.0%) REQUIRED: PROPERTY AREA LAND USAGE --0.20 ACRES BUILDING AREA (UNDER ROOF)--0.17 AC IMPERVIOUS PAVING (EXCLUSIVE OF BLDG.) 0.03 ACRES PERVIOUS PAVING 0.00 ACRES DESCRIPTION % OF PROPERTY AREAAREA 100.0% 0.0% GRASSED/LANDSCAPED AREA 0.00 ACRES 0.0% ZONING B-2 (CBD) PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE:7,474 SF (85.5%) CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCH. PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES; PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. X THE CONSTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR DETAILS.Fairhope Hardware MOP301 Fairhope AvenueFairhope, AL 36532N/F 05-46-03-37-0-601-002.523 FST PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE 336 FAIRHOPE AVENUE FAIRHOPE, AL 36532 N/F 05-46-03-37-0-601-003.514 FST, REID, JAMES H JR ETAL REID, BEVERLY PO BOX 638 MONTROSE, AL 36559 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS N/F 05-46-03-37-0-601-003.511 FST BETHEA, JOHN W PO BOX 205 FAIRHOPE, AL 36533 1 2 3 ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE SIGN ORDINANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE A STAGING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION. A PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE SHALL BE HELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. COORDINATION WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL BE NECESSARY DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE. SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE ARRANGED AS TO NOT NEGATIVELY EFFECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PROPOSED GREEN SPACE:0.00 AC 20. GROSS FLOOR AREA 12,407 SF 1ST FLOOR - 4 UNITS - COMMERCIAL / RETAIL - 7,371 SF SPACE USAGE 2ND FLOOR - 2 UNITS - OFFICE - 5,036 SF Civil Engineering& Surveying880 HOLCOMB BLVDSUITE 2FFAIRHOPE, AL 36532251-990-6566SITE FAIRHOPE AVECHURCH ST12 3 4 5 6 7 N/F 05-46-03-37-0-601-003.501 FST, GRIFFIN FAMILY LLC PO BOX 1710 DAPHNE, AL 36526 N/F 05-46-03-37-0-602-002.501 FST BETHEA, JOHN W PO BOX 205 FAIRHOPE, AL 36533 N/F 05-46-03-37-0-602-001.501 FST BETHEA, JOHN W PO BOX 205 FAIRHOPE, AL 36533 4 5 6 N/F 05-46-03-37-0-601-002.513 FST BETHEA, JOHN W PO BOX 205 FAIRHOPE, AL 36533 7 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS MAP KEY N.T.S.~ ---- ' ' ' ' ' 1 ___ _ m:-;----II _, , ' ... -... , , ' , ' ' , ' ' ' , ' - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SIP 0 ;-J I 0 0 0 • • 0 0 ~ ~ .·.·· .J I .. .. .. . . J I I J I LI I I J I I - 1                                                                                                                                                 UR 19.20 AT&T – September 5, 2019      Planning Commission  September 5, 2019  Utility Review  Case:  UR 19.20 AT&T     Project Name:  AT&T Fiber Optic Installation  throughout Fairhope’s ROW    Project Type:  Utility Review    Project Scope:    Install 650’ of Fiber Optic Cable  Via Directional bore.    Jurisdiction:  City of Fairhope     Zoning District:  ROW    General Location:  Twin Beech Estates Subdivision    Applicant:  AT&T    Owner:  City of Fairhope Right‐of‐Ways    Prepared by:  Mike Jeffries, QCI  City Planner    Recommendation:  Approve with Conditions                                    Le,g•nd _,._.,IMIIP...-oa! CtTYOF'F'AIIIIHOl't ZOW.NC , ..... =ta,...,...11....,. a•~~"-',.,. • .,...,o,r,1\:1 .. , Uw0'"'"'"""""'"...., All(• .,,., JIIICI 111,t "tll'o-4)Cl.....t"1 -.- _ ._. filllltol•Aot..,. • ....._0 _ ... ,i..,;,.,,S,,...,..t~ WCJ--•~O-o -a..i.~•-IMtoo!-t~ • .._ ,-. .. .--c~,~-~--- -._. ~•--~ ... ~01w,c,1 .ll,II.ILJl'!I ____ ID_ ........ ~1111'111 "1.ICl'"""""llnei>r,,,i,....,. D •...-c.iu,i j N -t I _ l<I --h~~~~~:;;~~~;~-::::__~-=: N t R-A • ResidentiilUAgriculture District ------------iliJ 1-------===:::j -t---~--1 ¥ 1-----------j • 1---~-- ll ?...!.illl 2                                                                                                                                                 UR 19.20 AT&T – September 5, 2019    Twin Beech Estates          Summary of Request:  Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed underground  installation of approximately 650 linear feet of fiber optic cable or drop and 1.5” and 2” HDPE conduit within the City  of Fairhope’s ROW’s. The installation will be a directional bore where indicated on drawings in the Twin Beech Estates  Subdivision. The project will require the boring under the road in Twin Beech Estates in various locations as indicated  on the drawings provided to provide service.  i i i i i ~ ~-c..._·_ 3                                                                                                                                                 UR 19.20 AT&T – September 5, 2019      Comments:  The proposed utility construction falls within the Corporate limits of Fairhope. The comments below are typical  general comments for City of Fairhope right‐of‐way projects. Any portions of the project affecting public right‐of‐way  (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits  through the Baldwin County Highway Department or ALDOT.     GENERAL COMMENTS      No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in  proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc.     SUPERINTENDENT AND DEPARTMENT HEAD COMMENTS   The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities.    Public Works Standard Comments:   Handholes shall not be located within driplines of Heritage Trees (as defined by the Tree Ordinance).   Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees.    If within a tree dripline, consult with the City of Fairhope Horticulturist before proceeding with earth work.     Trees shall not be negatively impacted.     The applicant shall provide drawings locating their utilities with other utilities and the sidewalks.   Any  boxes/handholes cannot be placed in the sidewalk.  The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there  are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate work with Richard D. Johnson, PE, Public Works Director, to resolve  any potential conflicts.       All conduit/cable shall be placed at depth from existing grade per industry and/or County Standards. A minimum  horizontal and/or vertical clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from stormwater and utility  infrastructures.  No handholes, boxes, or other above ground infrastructure shall be installed within drainage  easements.  Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles  to exit the roadway during an emergency. No grade change shall result from the utility installation. The applicant is to  avoid any tree drip lines with handholes and equipment.    The material under the sidewalk shall be compacted and the repair work shall be to the satisfaction of the Building  Official or his designated representative.  The applicant shall contact the Building Department for inspection prior to  placing concrete.    Code Enforcement Officer’s Standard Comments:   The applicant, or subcontractor, shall obtain a ROW permit from the City of Fairhope Building Department  prior to beginning work.   Subcontractors shall have a current business license with the City of Fairhope and shall have a copy of the  ROW permit available for review at all times, and shall be posted on site or in the window of contractor’s  vehicles.    Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day and disturbed areas shall be re‐vegetated  with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project.   Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover.   Sod shall be watered as needed to ensure survival.   Inlets shall be protected.   If site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), no red soils/clay are allowed as fill material, per the City’s  Red Clay/Soil Ordinance.    Building Official’s Standard Comments:  4                                                                                                                                                 UR 19.20 AT&T – September 5, 2019     BMP’s shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations.    Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better.       All plans and permits shall be available for review at all times along with the City of Fairhope permit  application.     If required, appropriate ALDOT or Baldwin County Highway Department permits shall be obtained prior to the  issuance of a right‐of‐way (ROW) permit.   Contractor is advised to review and comply with the Building Official’s best practices flyer.     Water and Sewer Standard Comments:   All existing utilities must be located, and proper separation shall be maintained between utilities.     All mechanical equipment shall be screened by painting the equipment Munsell Green.     Natural Gas Standard Comments:   Contractor shall provide proper separation from the gas main and all other utilities.      The applicant is advised of the following:    No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department or other  applicable jurisdiction (permit not valid until paid for and picked up by contractor).   The ROW permit shall be kept with the contractor or subcontractor at all times during site work.  The ROW  permit shall be posted on the job site or in the window of contractor(s) vehicle.    All contractors/subcontractors are subject to City of Fairhope Business License procedures.    This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of  Fairhope Ordinances:     1. City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands.  2. City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical  areas.  3. City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398).    State and Federal permits shall be on file with the City of Fairhope Building Department, prior to the issuance of City of  Fairhope permits.     The applicant shall provide as‐built profiles of the installed lines, showing the exact depth.      Recommendation:   Staff recommends approval of UR 19.20 conditional upon the following:  1) The applicant shall follow the general comments related to utility work, as stated above.  2) Applicant and applicant’s contractor shall follow the Right of Way Installation Permitting and Work Procedures  document provided by the Building Official.