Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-01-2019 Planning Commission Agenda PacketKari n Wilson ,1/cryor Council Memb1..·rs Kevin G. Boone Robert A. Brown jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Co nyers Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC ci,yclerk Michael V. Hin son. CPA City lrt:asurl!r 161 North Section Street Po. Drawer 429 Fairhope, Alabama 36533 25 1-928-2136 25!-928 -6776 fax w11~v.fairhopeal.go v Pnflhd (Jfl lt'l,JdcM f'tlpt,,.- 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes • June 3, 2019 City of Fairhope Planning Commission Agenda 5:00 PM Council Chambers July 1, 2019 3. Consideration of Agenda Items: A. ZC 19.08 B. ZC 19.09 Public hearing to consider the request of the City of Fairhope Planning and Zoning Department for an amendment to Article V. Special Districts and Uses in the Zoning Ordinance to establish a Greeno Road Corridor Overlay District. Public hearing to consider the request of Anil Vira to rezone property from R-2 Medium Density Single Family Residential District to B-2 General Business District. The property is located on the north side of Fels Avenue between Fels Avenue and S. Section Street at 303 Fels Avenue. PPIN #: 37258 C. ZC 19.10 Public hearing to consider the request of Provision Investments, LLC to rezone property from R-2 Medium Density Single Family Residential District to B-4 Business and Professional District. The property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Windmill Road and St. Hwy. 181, at 9979 Windmill Road. PPIN #: 77607 D. ZC 19.13 Public hearing to consider the request of Gayfer Village Partners, LLC to establish an initial zoning of PUD (Planned Unit E. SD 19.09 Development) conditional upon annexation into the City of Fairhope for property located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Fairhope Avenue and St. Hwy. 181, to be known as the Klumpp PUD. PPIN #: 236701, 316793, and 24160 Public hearing to consider the request of Wise Properties, LLC for site plan approval of Pier Street Marketplace, a 4-unit multiple occupancy project. The project is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Pier Street and S. Mobile Street. PPIN #: 16630 F. SD 19 .29 Public hearing to consider the request of Two Hands Design & Development, LLC for Preliminary plat approval of Hill Top Subdivision, a 29-lot division. The property is located on the west side of S. Section Street between Twin Beech Road and Battles Road. PPIN #: 19829 G. SD 19.30 Public hearing to consider the request of Firethorne Development, LLC for Final plat approval of Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne, a 26-lot subdivision. The property is located on the east side of St. Hwy. 181 just south of Quail Creek subdivision . PPIN #: 202889 H. IR 19.04 Request of Mullins, LLC for an Informal Review to rezone property from RA Residential Agriculture to R-2 Medium Density Single Family Residential District. The property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of State Hwy. 181 and Bay Meadows Avenue, at 19401 St. Hwy. 181, to be known as Live Oak Estates. PPIN #: 15078 I. IR 19 .05 Request of Carrigan Properties, LLC for an Informal Review to rezone multiple properties from R-6 Mobile Home Park District, R-2 Medium Density Single Family Residential District, and RA Residential/ Agriculture District to PUD (Planned Unit Development). The property is located on the west side of St. Hwy. 181 just north of Bay Meadows Avenue. PPIN #: 77751, 15244, and 226928 4 . Old/New Business 5 . Adjourn Jttne 3,2019 Pla nnin g Conun iss ion Minu tes The Planning Commission met Monday, June 3, 2019 at 5:00 PM at the City Municipal Complex, 161 N. Section Street in the Council Ch ambers. Present: Lee Turner, Chairperson; Ali Dyas; Rebecca Bryant; Hollie MacKellar; Richard Peterson; Robert Brown; Buford King, Intelirn Planning Director; Nancy Milford , Plam1er; Mike Jeffiies, Plamring Technician; Emily Boyett, Secretary; and Ken Watson, City Attorney Absent: Clarice Hall-Black, Hany Kohler, and Charles Johnson Chairman Turner called the meeting to order at 5:03 PM and announ ced the meeting is being recorded. Mr. Tomer announced Mr. Johnson has submitted his r esign ation from the C01runission due to hi s wife's health. ZC 19.07 Public hearing to consider the request of Mullins, LLC to rezone property from RA Residential Agriculture to PUD (Planned Unit Development), to be known as Live Oak Estates, Joe Rector. The prope1iy is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of St. Hwy. 181 and Bay Meadows Avenue, at 19401 St. Hwy. 181. Mr. Jeffries gave the staff report saying the applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 38 acres to allow 107 single family dwelling units and a future commercial p01iion. Staff recommendation is to APPROVE with the fo llowing conditions: 1. I. The commercial parcel uses are the same as the uses listed in Table 3-1 of the Zoning Ordinance for B-4 Business and Professional Distiict. 2. The Accessory Dwelling setbacks sh all be: Front -Behind the rear building line of the principal structure, Rear-5', Side-5', Street side-No nearer than the p1incipal structure, Maximum total lot coverage by accessory shucture -25% of required rear yard, Maximum h eight -30' but no taller than the p1incipal stru ctu re, and Minimum shucture separation from the principal structure -1 0'. 3. Development on the commercial parcel shall go through stand-alone Site Plan Rev iew. 4. Reflect 12' Drainage/Utility Easements instead of 1 0'. Mr. Dyas said a PUD is supposed to be innovative and not just to get higher density. Mr. Jeffries exp lained the appl icant is requesting a PUD to allow for residential and c01mn erc ial uses . Mr. D yas asked if the w idening of St. Hwy. 181 w ill imp act the proposed commercial area and the detention pond and Mr. J effiies responded no, the applicant has met with ALDOT and the additional right-of-way acquisition will be on the east sid e of the highway. Mrs. Bryant said it is hard to compare the ex isting density in the area with what is proposed. Mr. Jeffries said the design was based on Twin Beech Estate s, which r eceived final approval in March. Mr. Turner said he saw this area as a transition from Twin Beech Estates ' high density to a lower density like the existing properties on Bay Meadows. Mr. Rector addressed the Commission saying the site was desi gned to mirror T win Beech Estates and save th e large oak trees on Bay Meadows. It al so provides a central greenspace and detention area to be u sab le. He said the pond will b e an amenity. Mrs. MacKellar asked h ow th e commerci al will benefit th e residents of the development and Mr. Rector stated the specific u se has not been detennined at this time, but the 1 June3, 201 9 Planning Commi ss ion Minutes applicant has mentioned personal storage. Mr. Brown asked the density of Twin Beech Estates and Mr. King responded it is 3 .18 units per acre which is the same as the proposed development. Mr. Turner opened the publi c hearing. MarkRoshetko of9727 Derby Lane -He gave a b1iefhistory of the site. He explained the residents in the area do not want this development to change the character of Bay Meadows. He noted it does not have street lights or sidewalks, nor do they want them. He stated a similar request was denied in 1999 and be wants this request to be denied. Elliot Sylvester of9849 Bay Meadows Avenue-He said his family just moved to Bay Meadows Avenue for the quietness of the street. He stated his opposition for the proposal. Maliha and Gloria Monckton of 9571 Bay Meadows A venue -She stated the previous owner did not want this type development on the property. She said the Mayor ran her campaign on keeping Fairhope the same and she has failed. She stated the enh·ance should be on St. Hwy. 181 and not on Bay Meadows Avenue. Doug W1ight of9763 Bay Meadows Avenue-He stated Bay Meadows Avenue is a small two lane street and he had concerns with traffic and tree preservation. He said he is not in favor of the request and these developments are destroying what makes Fairhope desirable. Joy Willer of 19316 St. Hwy. 181 -She stated she is not against progress but has concerns with congestion. Julie Comer of 9551 Bay Meadows Avenue -She noted the City installed two speed bumps on Bay Meadows Avenue a year ago to cut down on the cut-through traffic and this development will increase the traffic. She stated she did not like the commercial aspect of the project and does not want a traffic signal at Bay Meadows Avenue and St. Hwy. 181. Having no one else present to speak, Mr. Turner closed the public hearing. Mr. Turner stated there is not much he likes about the proposal. He said the PUD dishict is to be something special, not just about getting higher density. He suggested larger lots to allow a transition from Twin Beech Estates to Bay Meadows Avenue. Mrs. Bryant stated she would like to see serviceable uses in the commercial portion to support the residential density. She added the protection of the trees along Bay Meadows Avenue, the central green, and the useable pond were favorable attributes. Richard Johnson, Public Works Director, claiified a traffic signal will be installed at Bay Meadows Avenue and St. Hwy. 181 regardless of this development. He explained ALDOT has required it as pmi of Firethome PUD and ALDOT will not allow this prope1iy ingress/egress to St. Hwy. 181. Mr. Turner stated the property will be developed at some point, but he would like to see larger lots. Mr. Brown said he agreed with the Commissioner's comments. Mr. Rector asked for specific items to address so they can come back with anoth er design and Mr. Turner stated larger lots and Mrs. Bryant said a more innovative design with diverse lots . Art Dyas made a motion to table the application as per the applicant 's request. Rebecca Bryant 2 nd the motion and the motion canied unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Ali Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robe1i Brown. NAY -none. 2 JuneJ,2019 PlanniJ1g Commission Minutes ZC 19.08 Public hearing to consider the request of the City of Fairhope Planning and Zoning Department for an amendment to Article V. Special DistJ·icts and Uses in the Zoning Ordinance to establish a Greeno Road Corridor Overlay District. Mr. King gave the staff report saying th e proposed document will establish an overlay distiict for Greeno Road. He explained the amendment will establish the following five distiicts to regulate development along Greeno Road: Northern Edge District, N01ih Village Center/Parker Road Village Center, Gateway Dishict, Fairhope Avenue Village Dishict, and Southern Edge District. He stated staff is not requesting the Commiss ion act on the amendment tonight, only review it and give feedback. Mr. Turner opened the public heming. Bobby Green of 415 Maple Street -He submitted a letter of his comments to the Commission. He stated the proposed amendment was poorly w1itten and rushed without affected prope11y owners or citizen input. He said it severely restiicts development and pushes developers to the unzoned county. Mr. Turner suggested marking up the proposed amendment and submitting it to staff for consideration. Anna Miller of257 Wesley Street-She asked why residents were not notified and Mr. Turner explained this is not a z oning change and individual property owners are not notified for ordinance amendments. She was in favor of the lighting , d1ive-through limits, and buffers between residential and conunercial u ses . She had concerns w ith residential roads becoming access roads. Ron Ross of 81 1 Gayfer A venue -He had concerns with buffe1ing incompatible uses from noise and light pollution. Having no one else present to speak, Mr. Turner closed the public hearing. Mr. Turner stated he would like to see the ordinance simplified to be easier to interp ret and enforce and Mr. Dyas agreed. Mr. King stated s taff will work to simplify the amendment and will bring it back at the July 1st meeting. SD 19.19 Public hearing to consider the request of Martinet Family Trust for plat approval of Martinet Subdivision, a 2-lot minor division, Seth Moore. The property is located on the south side of the intersection of Cains Lane and Laraway Lane. Ms. Milford gave the staff report saying the site is approximately 1.99 acres with 2 lots proposed . The applicant has submitted a waiver to the sidewalk requirements. Staff recommendation is to APPROVE contingent upon the following conditions: 1. Removal of the existing shop building on Lot 1. 2. Granting a waiver for the sidewalk exemption and adding a pedestrian easement if the Planning Commission desires this for future residents. Mr. Moore was present and stated the note has been added to the plat. Mr. Turner opened the public heming. Having no one present to speak, Mr. Turner closed the public hearing. A.it Dyas made a motion to accept the st aff recommendation to APPROVE contingent upon the following conditions: 1. Removal of the existing shop building on Lot 1. 2. Granting a waiver for the sidewalk exemption and adding a pedestrian easement. Rebecca Bryant 2 nd the motion and the motion cmTied un animously with the following vote: A YE -Art Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richm·d Peterson, and Robert Brown. NAY -none. 3 Jun e 3, 2019 Pl anning Commission Minutes SD 19.23 Public hea ring to consider the request of Rivers and Mandy Calvert for Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Calvert Family Subdivision, a 4-lot subdivision , Stewart Smith. The property is loca ted at the southwest comer of the intersection of River Park R oad and Meadow Road. Mr. Jeffries gave the staff r ep ort sayi ng the property is approximatel y 10 acres with 4 lots proposed. The p roj ect was appro ved by B aldwin County as a family subdiv isio n . The app licant i s requesting a waiver to the street frontage requirements . Staff recommendation is to APPROVE co nditional upon the following: 1. A pprova l of the waiver request from the Subdivision Regul at io ns Article V , Section E.3.a. "all lots shall front upon a paved, publicl y maintained street." Mr. Smith was present to answer any questions. Mr. Turner opened the publi c hearing. Having no one present to speak, Mr. Turner closed the publi c heating. Alt Dyas m ade a motion to accept the s taff recommendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. Approval of the waiver r equest from the Subdivision Regulations Article V, Section E.3.a. "all lots shall front upon a paved, publicly m aintained str eet." Richard Peterso n 2 nd t he motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Ali D yas, Reb ecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Rob ert Brown. NAY -n one. SD 19.2 5 Public hearing to consider the r equest of Riverwood Estates, LLC for Preliminary plat approval of River Place, a 23-lot subdivision, Chris Lieb. The prope1iy i s located on th e west side of Ri ver P ark Road just south of Cou nty Road 32 . Mr. Jeffri es gave the staff repo1t saying the p rope1ty i s approximately 24.2 acres with 23 lots proposed. The staff rec01m11end ation i s to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. Add note on plat that the detention/common areas shall be m aintained by the property owner's association and not b y Baldwin Count y or th e state of Alabama. (As n oted on sheet 6 of th e dra wings.) 2. Add curve and line data to the plat. 3. Provide a co py of the Co unt y's review and th e Co unty's Engineers Certificate of R evi ew. 4. Closeout testing repo1ts shall include mandrel tes ts on all HDPE stonn water drainage pipes. Mr. Turner opened the publi c heating. Crand all Langley of 16885 River P ark Road -He stated concerns wi t h light pollution, tresp assing, and traffic. H e requested a fence be built along his prope1iy line that ab uts the subj ect propeity. Mr. Turner stated the C01runission cannot require a fence b e co nstructed. Helen Horton of 16720 River Park Road -Sh e had concern s with headli gh t sh ining int o her hou se from the proposed entran ce, additional traffic, and prope1t y val ues. Mrs. Bryant noted the entrance seem s to b e situated between the prop e1i y lines across the street. Jo Owens of 16772 River Park Road - Sh e noted concerns with increased traffic and asked if a tum lane could b e constrn cted. Mr. King explained the property i s unzo ned co unty land and the Commi ssion can only re view the application against the Subdivision 4 June 3, 20 19 Pla nning Commission M inut~s Regulations. Mr. King suggest she speak with the Baldwin County Highway Department. Having no one else present to speak, Mr. Turner closed the public heaiing. Mr. Lieb stated he would pass the fence request to the developer. Richard Peterson made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. Add note on plat that the detention/co1mnon areas shall be maintained by the propetiy owner's association and not by Baldwin County or the state of Alabama. (As noted on sheet 6 of the drawings.) 2. Add cmve and line data to the plat. 3. Provide a copy of the County's review and the County's Engineers Certificate of Review. 4. Closeout testing reports shall include mandrel tests on all HDPE stonn water drainage pipes. Robett Brown 2nd the motion and the motion canied unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Ali Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robert Brown. NAY -none. SD 19.26 Public hearing to consider the request of Taylor D. Wilkins, III, for plat approval of Gayfer and Bishop subdivision, a 3-lot minor division, Larry Smith . The prope1ty is located on the northwest comer of the intersection of Gayfer Road and Bishop Road. Mr. King gave the staff report saying the property is approximately 1. 79 acres with 3 lots proposed. Staff recommendation is to APPROVE w ith the following condition: 1. A note shall be added to the plat stating an aid-to-construction fee may be required to provide sewer to one or two of the lots. Mr. Smith stated he is agreeab le to th e condition. Mr. Turner opened the public hearing. Having no one present to speak, Mr. Turner closed the public hearing. Ali Dyas made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to APPROVE with the following conditions: 1. A note shall be added to the plat stating an aid-to-construction fee may be required to provide sewer to one or two of the lots . 2 . A 1 O' sidewalk easement shall be added to the plat. Richard Peterson 2nd the motion and the motion canied unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Art Dyas , Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robe11 Brown. NAY -none. SD 19.27 Public hearing to consider the request of TH Fairhope Falls 2018, LLC for Final plat approval of Fairhope Falls, Phase Two, a 34-lot subdivision, Steve Pumphrey. The property is located on the south side of County Road 48 and west of Fish River. Ms. Milford gave t h e staff report saying the propetiy is approximately 27 .05 acres in unzoned Baldwin County and 34 lots are proposed. Staff rec01mnendation is to APPROVE contingent up on the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall complete the final punch list (including the incomplete landscaping) to the approval of the City of Fairhope Supervisors. 5 June3,20l9 Planning Commission Minutes 2. The Planning Commission approval of the waiver reque st asking for approval to not submit the sanitary sewer video for the Baldwin County Sewer System or the applicant shall supply the sanitary sewer video. 3. The surveyor shall sign the plat. 4. The applicant 's r epresentative shall provide plaiming staff a copy of the final inspection approval b y Baldwin County of the proposed subdivision and the stonn sewer video. 5. Submit a copy of the stonn sewer videos for Fairhope files. Mr. Turner opened the public hearing. Hav ing no one present to speak, Mr. Tlm1er clo sed the public hearing. Robert Brown made a motion to accept the staff reco mmendation to APPROVE contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall complete the final punch li s t (including the inco mplete landscaping) to the approval of the City of Fairhope Supervisors. 2. The Planning Commission approval of the wai ver reque st asking for approval t o not submit the sanitary sewer video for the Bald win County Sewer System or the applicant shall suppl y the sanitary sewer v ideo. 3. The surve yor shall sign the plat. 4. The applicant's representative shall provide planning staff a copy of the final inspection approval by Baldwin Co unty of the proposed subdivision and the stonn sewer video. 5. Submit a copy of the stonn sewer videos for Fairhope files. Hollie MacKellar 2nd the motion and the motion ca1Tied unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Ali Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robert Brown. NAY -none. SD 19.28 Public hearing to consider the request of The Verandas, LLC for Final plat approval of The Verandas, Phase 4, a 32-lot subdivision, Steve Pumphrey. The prope11y is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of State H wy. 104 and Lawrence Road . Ms. Milford gave the staff report saying the property i s approximately 57 .64 acres in ut1Zoned Baldwin County and 32 lots are proposed. Staff recommendation is to APPROVE contingent upon the following conditions: 1. The app1icant shall complete the final punch li st (including incomplete landscaping) to the approval of the City of Fairhope Department Head s. 2. Planning Commission approval of the waiver request asking for approval to not submit the sanitary sewer video for the Baldwin County Sewer System or the applicant shall submit the sanitary sewer video . 3. The surveyor sha11 sign the plat. 4. The applicant's representative shall provide planning staff a cop y of the final inspection approval b y Baldwin Count y of the propos ed subdivi sion and storm sewer v ideo. 5. The required completed subdivi sion bond package shall be provided. 6. Submit a copy of the sto1m sewer videos for Fairhope file s. Mr. Turner opened the public heating. Hav ing no one pre sent to speak, Mr. Turner clo sed the public hearing. Ali Dyas made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to APPROVE contingent upon th e followin g co nditions: 6 June 3,2019 Plannin g Commission Minut es 1. The applicant shall complete the final punch list (including incomplete land scaping) to the approval of the City of Fairhope Depaiiment Heads. 2. Planning Commission approval of the waiver request asking for approval to not submit the sanitary sewer video for the Baldwin County Sewer System or the applicant shall submit the sanitary sewer video. 3 . The surveyor shall sign the plat. 4. The applicant's representative shall provide planning staff a copy of the final inspection approval by Baldwin County of the proposed subdivision and stonn sewer video . 5. The required completed subdivi sio n bond package shall be provided. 6. Submit a copy of the stonn sewer videos for Fairhope files . Richard Peterson 2nd the motion and the motion canied unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Art Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robert Brown. NAY -none. UR 19.15 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 1,932 linear foot of underground fiber optic cable, Wade Mitchell. The project w ill run along Fairhope Avenue, N. School Street, Equality Street, N. Bancroft Street, Pine Street and N. Section Sh·eet. Mr. Jeffiies gave the staff report saying the project consists of the proposed underground installation of approximately 1932 linear feet of fiber optic cable and overlashing of approximately 900 ' of aerial fiber optic cable to existing copper cable within the City of Fairhope's ROW's. The installation will be a directional bore or aeiial where indicated on drawings along Fairhope Ave to N. School St. to Equality Ave. to N . Bancroft St. to Pine St. to N. Section St. The project will require the installation of 3 flush to grade handholes and 2 pedestals as indicated on the drawings provided. The proposed utility construction falls within the Corporate limits of Fairhope. Staff recommendation is to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant shall follow the general c01mnents related to utility work, as stated in the staff report. 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall follow the Right of Way Installation P ermitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. 3. A tree is proposed to be trimmed on the so uth side of Fairhope Ave. to the west of Ace Hardware. Paul Merchant the City 's Horticulturalist sh all be contacted to oversee the tiimming of the tree. Mrs. Bryant stated the referenced tree is very significant and wants to make sure the work does not damage it. Mrs. Boyett stated the City has a new light-of-way inspector to monitor the work and pre-construction meetings are held to make sure everyone is on the same page. Rebecca Bryant made a motion to accept the staff recommendation is to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1 . The applicant shall follow the general comments related to utility work, as stated in the staff report. 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall follow the Right of Way Installation Permitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. 7 June 3, 20 19 Plannin g Co mm ission Mi nutes 3. A tree is proposed to be t1immed on the south side of Fairhope Ave. to the west of Ace Hardware. Paul Merchant the City's Horticulturalist shall be contacted to oversee the hi1mning of the tree. Robert Brown 2 nd the motion and the motion canied unanimously with the fo ll owi ng vote: A YE -Art Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robe1t Brown. NAY -none. UR 19.16 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 636 linear foot of underground fiber optic cable, Wade Mitchell. The project wi ll run along S. Summit Street, St. James Street, and S. Bayview Street to service Knoll Flats at 72 Fairhope Avenue. Mr. Jeffries gave the staff repo1t saying the project consists of the proposed underground installation of approximately 636 linear feet of fiber optic cable and 1.5" HDPE conduit within the City of Fairhope's RO W's. The installation will be a directional bore where indicated on drawings along S. Summit St. to St. James Ave. to S. Bayview St. Not all work is continuous . Some areas of work are only under roads. The project will require the installation of 6 flush to grade handholes as indicated on the drawings provided. The proposed utility constrnction falls within the Corporate limits of Fairhope. Stafheconunendation is to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant shall follow the general c01mnents related to utility work, as stated in the staff repo1t. 2. Applicant and appli cant's contractor shall follow the R ight of Way Installation Permitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. Art Dyas made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant shall follow the general comments related to utility work, as stated in the staff repo1t. 2. Applicant and app li cant's contractor shall fo ll ow the Right of Way Installation Permitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. Richard Peterson 2nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Alt Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robert Brown. NAY -none. UR 19.17 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 1,231 linear foot of underground cable and conduit, Wade Mitchell. The project will nm from 8 S. Summit Street to 50 S. Bayview Street, via St. James Street. Mr. Jeffries gave the staff repo1i saying the project consist of the proposed underground ·installation of approximately 1231 linear feet of copper conununications cable and 1.5" HDPE conduit within the City ofFairhope's ROW 's. The installation will be a directional bore where indicated on drawings along St. James Ave. to S. Bayview St. The project will require the installation of 4 flush to grade handholes and 2 pedestals as indicated on the drawings provided. Also , this project is the removal of associated aelial facilities for the removal of Fairhope Utility poles. The proposed utility construction falls within the Corporate liinits of Fairhope. Staff recommendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 8 Jun e 3 , 201 9 Plannin g Co mmi ss ion Minutes 1. The applicant shall follow the general comments related to utility work as stated in the staff rep01i. 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall follow the Right of Wa y Installation Permitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. A.ii Dyas made a motion to accept the staff recommendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 1. The applicant shall follow the general comments related to utility work, as stated in the staff rep01i. 2. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall follow the Right of Way Installation P ermitting and Work Procedur es document provided by the Building Official. Richard Peterson 2 nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Art Dyas, Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robe1i Brown. NAY -none. UR 19.18 Request of AT&T for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of approximately 630 linear foot of underground fiber optic cable road crossings, Wade Mitchell. The project will nm tlu·oughout Fox Hollow , Phase 2. Mr. Jeffries gave the staff repmi saying the project will consist of the proposed underground installation of approximately 630 linear feet of fiber optic cable and 1.5" HDPE conduit within the City of Fairhope's ROW's. The installation will be a directional bore where indicated on drawings in the Fox Hollow Phase II Subdivision . The project will require the b01ing under the road in this new phase of Fox Hollow in various locations as indicated on the drawings provided to provide service. The proposed utility constrnction falls within the Corporate limits of Fairhope. Staff recommendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 3. The applicant shall follow the general cmmnents related to utility work, as stated in the staff report. 4. Applicant and applicant's contractor shall follow the Right of Way Installation Permitting and Work Procedures document provided by the Building Official. Robe1i Brown made a motion to accept the staff rec01mnendation to APPROVE conditional upon the following: 3. The applicant shall follow the general conunents related to utility work, as stated in the staff rep01i. 4 . Applicant and applicant's contractor shall follow the Right of Wa y Installation Permitting and Work Pro ce dures document provided by the Building Official. Richard Peterson 2 □ct the motion and the motion cai,ied unanimously with the following vote: A YE -Art Dyas , Rebecca Bryant, Lee Turner, Hollie MacKellar, Richard Peterson, and Robert Brown. NAY -none . Having no further business , Robe1i Brown made a motion to adjourn. Richard Peterson 2nd the motion and the motion canied unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 PM . Lee Turner, Chairman Emily Boyett, Secretary 9 Article III Section B Zoning Districts Allowed Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 19 Table 3-1: Use table Zoning District Uses Categories / Specific Uses R-A R-1(a,b,c) R-2 R-3 TH R-3 P/GH R-3 R-4 R-5 R-6 B-1 B-2 B-3a B-3b B-4 M-1 M-2 PUD VRM NVC CVC GRC Dwelling Uses in the PUD District shall be specified based on a development plan according to the standards and procedures of this ordinance Single-family             Two-family        ∋ Townhouse ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋   ∋ Patio Home ∋ ∋ Multiple-family / Apartment ∋    ∋ ∋ ∋ Manufactured Home ∋ Mixed-use        ∋ Accessory Dwelling ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Estate  Civic Elementary School                Secondary School               Education Facility             Library                Place of Worship    Cemetery              Hospital         Public Open Space                Common Open Space                Community Center or Club               Public Utility                     Office General         Professional         Home Occupation ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Retail Grocery        ∋ Convenience Store ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Car Wash ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ General Merchandise        ∋ Shopping Center  ∋ Automobile Service Station     ∋ ∋ ∋ Outdoor Sales Limited      Outdoor Sales Lot    Garden Center       Service Convalescent or Nursing Home               Clinic               Outdoor Recreation Facility               Day Care               General Personal Services       ∋ General Personal Services with Drive Through ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Mortuary or Funeral Home       Automobile Repair ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Indoor Recreation        Dry Cleaner / Laundry       ∋ Dry Cleaner / Laundry with Drive Through ∋    ∋ Personal Storage  ∋ ∋     Bed & Breakfast      ∋ Hotel / Motel    ∋ Boarding House or Dormitory        Recreational Vehicle Park ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Restaurant       ∋ Restaurant with Drive Through  ∋  ∋ ∋ ∋ ∋ Catering     ∋ Bar      ∋ Entertainment Venue      Marina      Kennel or Animal Hospital    Warehouse   Junk Yard or Salvage Yard   Manufacturing Limited       Light   General   Food Processing  Rural Agriculture  Rural Market  Plant Nursery   Permitted subject to general ordinance standards and conditions. ∋ Permitted subject to special conditions listed in the ordinance  Permitted only on appeal and subject to special conditions Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 25 (8) Off-street parking shall be located within the interior of the lot. A common parking area serving no more than six patio homes may be centrally located, provided it is not more than 100 feet from any dwelling unit it serves and is screened from public right-of-ways and adjacent property. (9) The exterior walls of the patio home, or any accessory structures located on the zero-foot side yard setback shall not project over the property lines. Roof overhang may penetrate maintenance and drainage easement of the adjacent lot a maximum of 30 inches, provided the roof shall be so designed that water run off shall be restricted to the drainage easement area. (a) Where adjacent zero lot line dwellings are not constructed against or along a common lot line, a perpetual drainage easement shall be provided which shall be approved by the city engineering department. Fences and walls may be located on or along this easement provided gates or other openings that will not block local lot drainage are maintained. (b) The lot adjacent to the zero setback side yard must be under the same ownership at the time of initial construction (ensuring that a developer does not infringe on the property rights of owners of adjacent tracts). (c) A 15-foot side setback shall be required, provided the adjacent property is not zoned for patio homes or is not a permitted use in the adjacent zoning district. 4. Automobile Service Stations, Convenience Stores, Car Wash Facilities, and Automobile Repair Facilities a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions for Automobile Service Stations, Convenience Stores, Car Wash Facilities, and Automobile Repair Facilities is to: • Provide access to necessary services offered by automobile service stations, convenience stores, car wash facilities, and automobile repair facilities from all areas of the city; • Allow service stations, convenience stores, car wash facilities, and automobile repair facilities to be appropriately mingled with other non-residential uses; • Ensure location and design standards compatible with surrounding property, particularly the scale and intensity of surrounding commercial uses; • Minimize the potential negative impact that automobile service stations, convenience stores, car wash facilities, and automobile repair facilities may have on surrounding property and neighborhoods; • Recognize that the design and scale of automobile service stations, convenience stores, car wash facilities, and automobile repair facilities can determine how well this use fits in with surrounding uses. b. Location Restrictions: (1) In the NVC district or CVC district, automobile service stations may be located anywhere subject to the special design requirements listed in Section D.4.d of this Article (2) In all other districts, the property on which an automobile service station or convenience store is located shall not be within 100 feet of any residential district, or any property containing a school, public playground, church, hospital, public library, institution for children or dependents. (3) Additional requirements and/or restrictions may apply within the Greeno Road Corridor (GRC) Overlay District. c. Site Requirements: (1) All uses within this section automobile service station or convenience store shall have a minimum front lot line on the primary right-of-way of 120 feet and a minimum lot area of 12,000 square feet. (2) All buildings shall be set back at least 40 feet from all right-of-way lines and. all canopies shall be set back 15 feet from all right-of- way lines. • Greeno Road Corridor (GRC) Overlay District requirements shall apply as appropriate to the “build to” line and distance from right-of-way. (3) Service bay doors shall not front upon public rights-of-way and shall not face toward residential uses. Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 26 (4) Building facades open to view from public rights-of-way shall have a minimum 5’-0” wide planter strip along the building foundation. • Greeno Road Corridor (GRC) Overlay District Requirements shall apply as appropriate to landscape buffers and sidewalk placement. (5) A raised curb of at least six inches in height shall be erected along the right-of-way lines, except for driveway openings. (6) A solid fence or wall not less than six feet nor more than eight feet in height Screening and buffering as required by Section 20.5-4 (11) Buffer Zone Landscaping of Ordinance number 1444 shall be erected along all adjacent property lines facing any adjacent residential use. (5) Light or glare shall not spill onto adjacent property or right-of-ways. In addition to the requirements of Article IV, Section “B”, all light fixtures shall be either recessed into a canopy, or if they protrude shall have a box that shields the bulb from direct view. A light fixture that protrudes from the bottom of a canopy shall have a box completely surrounding the bulb and the lens shall be flush with the box. Lenses shall not protrude past the bottom of the box. See figure 3-3. Should a gas station canopy be repaired or improved and the value of the improvements or the repair total 50% or more of the assessed value of the structure, these lighting requirements must be met. This 50% value is a cumulative total. i. Lights shall not be mounted on the top or fascia of the canopy, and fascias of the canopy shall not be illuminated ii. Fuel station canopies fascia shall not be illuminated, transparent, reflective, or encircled in lights (6) All driving, parking storage, and service areas shall be paved and curbed. (7) No uses within this section automobile service station or convenience store shall be extended in area unless the proposed extension is in conformity with the requirements. (8) All gasoline fuel pump islands shall be set back at least 15 feet from the rear building line of the principle structure. right-of-way line, or where a future widening line has been established, the setback line shall be measured from such line, and where pump islands are constructed perpendicular to the right-of-way. However, the pumps shall be at least 60 feet from the centerline of an arterial street, 55 feet from the centerline of a collector street and 45 feet from the centerline of other streets. (9) Vehicular entrances or exits shall be provided according to Article V. of the Subdivision Regulations. d. Special Design Requirements – All convenience stores, automobile service stations, car wash facilities, and automobile repair facilities in all districts: In addition to the above site requirements, the following special design requirements shall apply: (1) Automatic Teller Machines (ATMs) shall be located inside the convenience store, automobile service station, car wash facility, or automobile repair facility building. (2) Snipe signs and commercial displays in and around fuel pump islands shall not be permitted. (3) Electronic fuel pricing signage is permitted, however no electronic signage in addition to fuel pricing is allowable. Fuel pricing shall remain static between fuel pricing changes. (4) Fuel station canopies shall not exceed a ceiling height of 15’-0” and the clearance height shall be clearly identified with a telltale bar. (5) Adornments to the canopy fascia shall not be designed to express corporate identities via signs, logos, paint colors, or other brand identification (6) Buildings, roofs, and canopies shall not have corporate color banding. Figure 3-3. All light sources shall be shielded. Protruding bulbs and lenses are prohibited. Figure 3-4. Maximum 10-foot setback in the NVC or CVC Districts. Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 27 (7) Any signage (including corporate logos or images) provided on a fuel station canopy shall be deducted from the allowable wall signage of the primary structure as allowed by Ordinance 1537 and may not comprise any more than 50% of the vertical height of the canopy face. (8) Fuel tank vents shall be screened from view or integrated into the building (9) Car Wash facilities (both self-serve and automated) i. Car washes and vacuums shall not be located within 100’-0” of any residential use. ii. Buildings, roofs, and canopies shall not have corporate color banding. Any signage provided on a car wash building shall be deducted from the allowable wall signage of the primary structure as allowable by Ordinance 1537. d. Special Design Requirements – NVC and CVC Districts: In addition to the above site requirements, the following special design requirements shall apply to automobile service stations or convenience stores located in the NVC or CVC districts. (Automobile Repair and Car Wash Facilities are not allowable uses in the NVC or CVC) (1) All buildings shall be set back no more 10 feet from all right-of-way lines. Any area between the building and the right-of-way shall only be used for landscape elements. See Figure 3-4. (2) All buildings shall have a primary entrance facing the street, directly connected to the public sidewalk. (3) At least 60% of all street-frontages on the lot shall be occupied by the building. On corner lots, the street frontage on the secondary street may be occupied by the building on as little as 50% of that frontage, provided that the 60% requirement is met when both frontages are combined. See Figure 3-5. (4) All buildings shall have at least 50% clear glazing on of any street facing ground level. Glazing on windows and doors shall count towards this requirement. See Figure 3-6. (5) Pump islands shall be located behind or to the side of the building. (6) No more than two pump islands with a maximum of four pumping stations per island shall be located on the site. (7) No more than two service bays shall be located on the site. Service bays shall not face the primary street frontage of the building. (8) All driving, parking storage, and service areas shall be paved and curbed. (9) All fuel gasoline pump islands shall be set back at least 15 feet from the rear building line of the principle structure. right-of-way line, or where a future widening line has been established, the setback line shall be measured from such line, and where pump islands are constructed perpendicular to the right-of-way. However, the pumps shall be at least 60 feet from the centerline of an arterial street, 55 feet from the centerline of a collector street and 45 feet from the centerline of other streets. (10) Vehicle entrance and exits shall be subject to the specifications in the Subdivision Regulations. (11) No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted on the site. (12) All vehicles shall be stored in an enclosed area and all vehicle repairs shall occur in an enclosed area. (13) All automobile service stations are subject to special site enhanced screening conditions to appropriately screen adjacent property from parking, pump islands, or service bays. This site screening shall be specific to the context of the site and may involve landscape, walls, or other elements in accordance with the tree and landscape ordinance. 5. Home Occupations a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions of Home Occupations is to: T-----1 I i i ~·-·--1 I J l J J .. Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 28 • Provide opportunities for residents to earn income and operate businesses from their home; • Allow businesses that do not adversely impact the residential character of neighborhoods; and • Ensure that the ongoing operations of home occupations are not visible or detrimental to adjacent residents and property owners. b. Location Restrictions: (1) Home occupations are permitted in all districts where residences are permitted, if licensed by the City’s revenue officer and conforming to the special conditions of this section and any applicable laws or ordinances. (2) Any operation, which, whether by requirement of any law or regulation or for any other reason, requires a full and complete separation from the living area of the main building, shall not be construed as a home occupation within the meaning of the ordinance. c. Site Requirements: (1) The home occupation shall be an accessory use, incidental to the primary use of the premises for residential purposes. (2) The home occupation shall be operated only by members of the family residing on the premises. No non-family employees shall be employed on the premises. No article or service shall be sold or offered for sale except as may be produced by members of the family residing on the premises and no merchandise shall be delivered to customers at the premises. (3) No home occupation shall alter the appearance of the home or neighborhood either through structural changes or through ongoing activities and operations. The building shall be an existing structure ready for occupancy and not a proposed structure. No building altered in any fashion inconsistent with the residential appearance for the purpose of accommodating or expanding any home occupation, existing or proposed. (4) Parking for not more than two vehicles in conjunction with home occupation may be provided in the existing driveway area. No expansion of parking to serve the home occupation shall be permitted and in no case shall public property be utilized for parking. Uses that require additional parking per the parking schedule shall not be eligible as a home occupation. (5) The home occupation shall not generate excessive traffic or produce obnoxious odors, glare, noise vibration, electrical disturbance, radioactivity, electromagnetic interference or any other condition detrimental to the character of the surrounding area. (6) Business signs shall not be permitted for home occupations located within residential districts. In other use districts, signs shall not exceed two square feet in sign area, attached to the face of the building, limited to one sign only. (7) For purposes of home occupations, the written statements of the majority of owners of property within 300 feet in opposition to the home occupation shall be sufficient cause to determine that the use is of a character detrimental to the surrounding area. d. License (1) No license, new or renewal, shall be issued until an application shall have been completed by applicant, premises inspected and application endorsed with approval of the Director of Planning and Building. (2) The applicant for a home occupation license shall either own the property or, if a tenant, have the owner’s written permission to engage in the proposed home occupation. (3) The license shall be kept on file at the premises where the home occupation is located and shall be subject to examination by the revenue officer or Director of Planning and Building upon request, and shall be surrendered to the city upon written citation for violations of any condition or ordinance requirement. (4) Home occupation licenses shall expire on the 31st day of December of each calendar year and are delinquent February 1st. 6. Cemeteries a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions for cemeteries is to: • Provide public access to cemeteries within the City; Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 29 • Allow cemeteries to establish a park-like, civic setting to mourn, honor, and commemorate the deceased; and • Ensure location and site conditions that are compatible to surrounding property and neighborhoods. b. Location Restrictions: (1) The site proposed for a cemetery shall not interfere with the development of a system of collector or larger streets in the vicinity of the site. In addition, the site shall have direct access to an arterial street. (2) Any new cemetery shall be located on a site containing not less than twenty (20) acres. c. Site Requirements: (1) All structures shall be set back no less than 25 feet from any property line or minor street right-of-way. (2) All graves or burial lots shall be set back not less than 25 feet from any property line on local street right-of-way lines, and not less than 50 feet from any collector or arterial street right-of-way. (3) The entire cemetery property shall be landscaped and maintained. (4) The expansion of any existing cemetery shall only be allowed according to the Special Exception procedures in Article II. 7. Storage and Parking of Trailers and Commercial Vehicles a. Intent: The intent for the special conditions for Storage and Parking of commercial Vehicles is to: • Provide opportunities for residents to own, utilize, and store commercial vehicles, trailers, and recreational vehicles; and • Ensure that parking and temporary storage of commercial vehicles, trailers, and recreational vehicles is not detrimental to the neighborhood character and adjacent residents or property owners. b. Location Requirements: Commercial vehicles and trailers of all types, including travel, boat, camping and hauling, shall not be parked or stored on any lot occupied by a dwelling or any lot in any residential district except in accordance with the requirements in this section. c. Site Requirements: (1) No more than one commercial vehicle per dwelling shall be permitted. In no case shall a commercial vehicle used for hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be permitted. (2) No travel trailer, hauling trailer, utility trailer, boat, boat trailer, motor home or commercial vehicle shall be parked or stored in the front yard, or on corner lots, in a side yard abutting a public right-of- way or upon the right-of-way. The length of said vehicle shall not exceed twenty-eight feet (28’). (3) These vehicles shall be allowed in a side yard only if the rear yard cannot be reasonably accessed. Topographical features, the existence of mature trees or the existence of properly permitted and constructed structures, which prevent rear yard parking, is sufficient to establish a lack of rear yard access. If parked in the rear yard, a hard surface pad with access shall be provided by either a hard surface drive, hard surface drive strips or an access drive constructed of turf block materials. All vehicles covered by this section shall have a minimum side and rear setback of six feet (6’). No vehicle covered in this section shall be located in a side yard containing a driveway. (4) A travel trailer shall not be occupied either temporarily or permanently while it is parked or stored in any area except in a recreational vehicle park authorized under this ordinance. (5) A junked vehicle, or one that is not operational shall not be permitted to be located on or near lots with dwelling units. These junked autos shall be confined to junkyards. (6) Heavy equipment, including but not limited to tractors greater than 40 horsepower, any tracked vehicle, dozers, backhoes, excavators, trenchers, forklifts, aerial lifts, dump trucks greater than 20,000 lbs Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR), ride-on soil compactors, skid steer loaders, logging machines, knuckle boom loaders, wheel or tracked loaders, trailers greater than 10,000 lbs GVWR, or other similar pieces of heavy at the judgment of the Planning and Zoning director are inappropriate for storage and/or parking in residential use areas and shall be forbidden. 8. Personal Storage a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions for Personal Storage is to: Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 30 • Allow for personal storage services to be mixed with other compatible commercial uses; • Ensure that personal storage facilities are located appropriately in order to minimize the impact on adjacent property; and • Recognize that the design and scale of personal storage facilities can determine how well this use fits in with surrounding uses. b. Location Requirements: (1) Exterior personal storage facilities on more than two acres shall be located only in the M-1 and M-2 districts and only by special exception. (2) Exterior personal storage facilities on less than two acres and indoor personal storage facilities may be located in the B-2 district and only by special exception. c. Site Requirements: (1) All one-way drive aisles shall provide for one 10-foot wide travel lane. Traffic direction and parking shall be designated by signs or painting. (2) All two-way drive aisles shall provide for one 10-foot wide parking lane and two 12-foot wide travel lanes. (3) Two parking spaces, to be located at the project office for use of clients, shall be provided for the manager’s quarters plus one additional space for every 25 storage cubicles. (4) Any other site requirements determined through the special exception procedure to minimize impacts on adjacent property. 9. Accessory Dwelling Units a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions for accessory dwelling units is to allow flexibility in living arrangements and home occupations while maintaining the residential character of existing neighborhoods. These standards apply to all districts except for the Village Districts in Article VI. b. Location Restrictions: Accessory dwelling units shall be located on the same lot as the principal structure and are subject to the dimension standards in Section C.2. of this Article. c. Site Requirements: (1) Any accessory dwelling unit structures shall only have a half bath. (2) Kitchens and electrical wiring or gas-supporting kitchens are prohibited. (3) Any accessory structure proposed for office or extra living areas shall not be larger than 50% of the gross square footage of the principal structure. (4) Any utilities for an accessory dwelling structure shall run through the principal structure. e. Exception: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this subsection 9 to the contrary any “bona-fide” mother- in-law suite with a kitchen, attached to the principle structure, under common roof, shall not be deemed to be an accessory dwelling unit for purpose of this zoning ordinance but, instead, shall be deemed to be a part of the principle dwelling unit. (2) An accessory structure, not containing sleeping facilities or electrical wiring or gas- supporting kitchens, or any other fixtures or appurtenances that creates an accessory dwelling use may have only a half bath. 10. Building Materials on Commercially Zoned Property a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions on building material for commercially zoned property is to prevent negative visual impact, provide attractiveness and beautification, and protect commercial property values. Article III Section D Zoning Districts Special Conditions for Uses FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 31 b. Location restrictions: The special conditions in this section shall apply to any commercially zoned property in the City of Fairhope. b. No building or portion of a building visible from a public street or right-of-way shall be exposed metal. A façade of some type or material shall be used to visually screen the metal from the public street or right-of-way. 11. Uses Containing Drive Though Lanes / Drive Through Windows a. Intent: The intent of the special conditions for Drive Through Lanes / Drive Through Windows is to: • Provide access to various services offered by uses containing drive through lanes and drive through windows; • Allow uses containing drive through lanes and drive through windows to be appropriately mingled with other non-residential uses; • Ensure location and design standards compatible with surrounding property, particularly the scale and intensity of surrounding commercial uses; • Minimize the potential negative impact that uses containing drive through lanes and drive through windows may have on surrounding property and neighborhoods; b. Location Restrictions: (1) In the NVC district or CVC district, uses containing drive through lanes / drive through windows are not allowable. (2) In all other districts, the property on which a drive through lane / drive through window is otherwise allowable shall not be within 100 feet of any residential district, or any property containing a residential use. (3) Additional requirements and/or restrictions may apply within the Greeno Road Corridor (GRC) Overlay District. c. Special Design Requirements – In addition to the above location restrictions, the following special design requirements shall apply: (1) Drive through speaker shall not exceed 50 decibels i. Shall not play recorded messages. (2) Menu boards / order boards i. Shall be a maximum of 30 square feet in area ii. Shall be a maximum 6’ tall iii. Shall be shielded from view from any public street and adjacent residential uses or residentially-zoned property (3) No less than four (4), 20’ long and 10’ wide stacking lanes shall be located at or behind the drive through window or appurtenance i. May be reduced in number if recommended by a traffic impact study prepared by a licensed professional engineer ii. Separated from other vehicular use and site circulation areas by a landscaped raised divider median iii. Shall be 12’ wide in curved areas iv. Shall not enter or exit directly into a public street v. Shall not interfere with waste handling and material loading areas vi. If curbed, shall include an emergency by-pass or exit (4) Uses including a drive through lane located adjacent to residential uses or residentially- zoned property shall provide screening and buffering as required by Section 20.5-4 (11) Buffer Zone Landscaping of Ordinance number 1444 Article IV Section B Site Design Standards Screening, Lighting, and Landscape Material FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 34 B. Screening, Lighting and Landscape Material 1. Intent The screening, lighting, and landscape material sections are intended to create a quality community image, minimize the impact of development on adjacent sites, allow property owners to create comfortable and appropriate private environments, and integrate all development into the overall community plan. 2. Screening a. In any district, all mechanical or operating equipment, materials, or activities not contained within a building, such as drive-through equipment, outdoor storage of materials, stationary machinery, and outdoor servicing activities, shall be enclosed by a wall or fence of solid appearance or tight evergreen hedge not less than six feet in height. If the owner elects to build a wall or fence of bare or severe appearance it shall be enhanced with the planting of shrubs. b. In any district where a commercial/industrial use abuts a residential use, screening/buffering shall be required. Acceptable screening/buffering shall include a wall or fence of solid appearance, or tight evergreen hedge not less than six feet (6’) in height and a twenty foot (20’) landscaped buffer containing at least one (1) overstory tree and five (5) shrubs per every twenty-five linear feet (25’). 3. Parking Lot/Open Area Lighting Parking lots with 50 or fewer spaces and open area requiring lighting for general purposes shall have light poles that do not exceed 10 feet overall height. Parking lots having more than 50 spaces shall have light poles that do not exceed 20 feet overall height. Luminaries of a sharp cut off design to shield light source above 72 degrees from vertical and providing 1.0 average maintained foot-candles with the following uniformity ratios: 3:1 average/minimum * (.33 FC minimum), 12:1 maximum/minimum * (4.0 FC maximum) are required in all cases. Public facilities such as lighted ball fields are excluded. A photometric grid shall be furnished by developer at time of building permit application. * maximum or minimum foot-candle level at any point lighted area. 3. Lighting a. Applicability. The applicant for any permit required for work involving lighting shall submit documentation at time of site plan, multiple occupancy project plot plan, or building permit request that the proposed lighting plan complies with the provisions of this Code. The submission shall contain, but not be limited to the following, all or part of which may be part of or in addition to the information required elsewhere in this Code: (1) A point-by-point footcandle array in a printout format indicating the location and aiming of illuminating devices. The printout shall indicate compliance with the maximum maintained footcandles required by this Code. (2) Description of the illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports, reflectors, poles, raised foundations and other devices (including but not limited to manufacturers or electric utility catalog specification sheets and/or drawings, and photometric report indicating fixture classification [cutoff fixture, wall pack, flood light, etc.]). b. Nonconformities. Following application of this regulation, the installation of lighting, replacement of lighting, and changes to existing light fixture wattage, type of fixture, mounting, or fixture location shall be made in strict compliance with this Code. Routine Article IV Section B Site Design Standards Screening, Lighting, and Landscape Material FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 35 maintenance, including changing the lamp, ballast, starter, photo control, fixture housing, lens and other required components, is permitted for all existing fixtures. c. Exemptions. (1) A detached single family home shall be exempt from the requirement of submission of the photometric analysis with the building permit. (2) When federal or state laws, rules and regulations take precedence over these provisions. (3) Public Schools. (4) City of Fairhope recreational facilities. d. Light Measurement Technique. Light level measurements shall be made at the property line of the property upon which the light to be measured is being generated. If measurement on private property is not possible or practical, light level measurements may be made at the boundary of the public street right-of-way that adjoins the property of the complainant or party requesting inquiry or at any other location on the property of the complainant or party requesting inquiry. Measurements shall be made at finished grade (ground level), with the light-registering portion of the meter held parallel to the ground pointing up. The meter shall have cosine and color correction and have an accuracy tolerance of no greater than plus or minus five percent. Measurements shall be taken with a light meter that has been calibrated within the year. Light levels are specified, calculated and measured in footcandles (FC). All FC values below are maintained footcandles. e. General Standards for Lighting (1) Unless otherwise specified below, the maximum light level shall be ten maintained footcandle at any property line in a residential use area, or on a lot occupied by a dwelling, congregate care or congregate living structure, and 15 maintained footcandles at any public street right-of-way. (2) No operation or activity producing glare in excess of the amounts permitted below: i. All business and industrial districts: Any operation or activity producing glare shall be conducted so that direct or indirect light from the source shall not cause illumination in excess of ten footcandles when measured in a residential use area. (3) All flood lights shall be installed so that the fixture shall be aimed down at least 45 degrees from vertical, or the front of the fixture is shielded so that no portion of the light bulb extends below the bottom edge of an external shield. Flood lights and display lights shall be positioned so that any such fixture located within 50 feet of a public street right-of-way is mounted and aimed perpendicular to the right-of-way, with a side-to-side horizontal aiming tolerance not to exceed 15 degrees from perpendicular to the right-of-way. (4) All flood lamps emitting 1,000 or more lumens shall be aimed at least 60 degrees down from horizontal, or shielded such that the main beam from the light source is not visible from adjacent properties or the public street right-of-way. (5) All wall pack fixtures shall be cutoff fixtures. (6) Within the Greeno Road Corridor (GRC) Overlay District all lighting fixtures shall be either semi-cutoff or full- cutoff fixtures. f. Lighting in Parking Lots and Outdoor Areas (1) Parking lots with 50 or fewer spaces and open area requiring lighting for general purposes, except outdoor sports field lighting and outdoor performance area lighting, shall have light poles that do not exceed 10 feet overall height. Parking lots Article IV Section B Site Design Standards Screening, Lighting, and Landscape Material FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 36 having more than 50 spaces shall have light poles that do not exceed 20 feet overall height. (2) Other than flood lights and flood lamps, all outdoor area and parking lot lighting fixtures of more than 2,000 lumens shall be cutoff fixtures, or comply with at least one of the provisions in subsection (3) below. (3) Exceptions: i. Non-cutoff fixtures may be used when the maximum initial lumens generated by each fixture shall not exceed 9,500 initial lamp lumens per fixture. ii. All metal halide, mercury vapor, fluorescent, induction, white high pressure sodium and color improved high pressure sodium lamps used in non-cutoff fixtures shall be coated with an internal white frosting inside the outer lamp envelope. iii. All metal halide fixtures equipped with a medium base socket must utilize either an internal refractive lens or a wide-body refractive globe. iv. All non-cutoff fixture open-bottom lights shall be equipped with full cutoff fixture shields that reduce glare and limit uplight. (4) All light fixtures shall meet the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) definition of cutoff fixtures. Forward throw fixtures (type IV light distribution, as defined by the IESNA) are required within 25 feet of any public street right-of-way. Alternatively, directional fixtures (such as flood lights) may be used provided they shall be aimed and shielded in accordance with this ordinance. (5) g. Lighting for Vehicular Canopies (1) Areas under a vehicular canopy shall have a maximum point of horizontal illuminance of 24 maintained footcandles (FC). Areas outside the vehicular canopy shall be regulated by the standards of subsection (b) “General Standards for Lighting” above. Lighting under vehicular canopies shall be designed so as not to create glare off- site. Acceptable methods include one or more of the following: i. Recessed fixture incorporating a lens cover that is either recessed or flush with the bottom surface (ceiling) of the vehicular canopy. ii. Light fixture incorporating shields, or shielded by the edge of the vehicular canopy itself, so that light is restrained to five degrees or more below the horizontal plane. iii. Surface mounted fixture incorporating a flat glass that provides a cutoff fixture or shielded light distribution. iv. Surface mounted fixture, typically measuring two feet by two feet, with a lens cover that contains at least two percent white fill diffusion material. v. Indirect lighting where light is beamed upward and then reflected down from the underside of the vehicular canopy. Such fixtures shall be shielded such that direct illumination is focused exclusively on the underside of the vehicular canopy. h. Lighting of Buildings and Landscaping (1) Lighting fixtures shall be selected, located, aimed, and shielded so that direct illumination is focused exclusively on the building facade, plantings, and other intended site feature and away from adjoining properties and the public street right-of-way. i. Diagrams. (1) Full cutoff fixture: an outdoor light fixture shielded or constructed in such a manner that it emits no light above the horizontal plane of the fixture. Article IV Section B Site Design Standards Screening, Lighting, and Landscape Material FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 37 (2) Semi-Cutoff Fixture: An outdoor light fixture shielded or constructed in such a manner that it emits no more than five percent of its light above the horizontal plane of the fixture, and no more than 20 percent of its light ten degrees below the horizontal plane of the fixture. (3) Cutoff Fixture: An outdoor light fixture shielded or constructed in such a manner that no more than two and one-half percent of the total light emitted by the fixture is projected above the horizontal plane of the fixture. (4) Non-Cutoff Fixture: An outdoor light fixture constructed in such a manner that it emits light in all directions. (5) Flood Light: A form of lighting designed to direct its output in a diffuse, more or less specific direction, with reflecting or refracting elements located external to the lamp. ' \ • _\ Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 64 (2) Mixed-use buildings shall be vertically mixed in use. Retail uses shall be placed at street level. F. Special Exceptions. (1) Research and development (2) Hotel (3) Crematoria (4) And any such other uses as deemed appropriate in the district by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall review a proposed use at the time the special exception application is presented to the Planning Commission according to the submittal deadlines and meeting dates established by the Planning Commission. G. Development Standards. (1) The B-4 (Business and Professional District) development standards and area and dimensional requirements shall apply in this district: (2) Any residential, hotel, dormitory, nursing home or convalescent use shall not exceed the density established for the R-5 (High Density Multi-Family Residential District) at a minimum lot area of 10,500 square feet for two dwelling units plus 4,100 square feet for each additional unit / 10 units per acre maximum. (3) No building or portion of a building visible from a public street or right of way shall be exposed metal. A façade of some type or material shall be used to visually screen the metal from the public street or right of way. I. GRC – Greeno Road Corridor Overlay District 1. Intent – The Greeno Road Corridor Overlay District (GRC) is intended to provide a transition of use intensity from less intensity to greater intensity back to less intensity along Greeno Road. The GRC overlay begins at Dale Drive near the Daphne city limits and terminates at Battles Road, a distance of approximately 6.5 miles. The GRC overlay includes five (5) distinct areas approximately 400’ wide east and 400’ wide west of the centerline of Greeno Road (US HWY 98) within the Corporate Limits of The City of Fairhope. Areas subsequently annexed into the City of Fairhope occurring within the GRC shall automatically be included with the GRC. The GRC applies to the entire parcel of land within the City of Fairhope for which the GRC overlay district line crosses. The GRC includes the following areas: • Northern Edge District o Dale Drive to South Drive • North Village Center (Parker Road) District o South Drive to State HWY 104 • Gateway District o State HWY 104 to Edwards Avenue • Fairhope Avenue Village Center District o Edwards Avenue to Morphy Avenue • Southern Edge District o Morphy Avenue to Battles Road The GRC is much more automobile-oriented than the CBD, however the GRC seeks to reflect the “Fairhope Image” contemplated by the Comprehensive Plan through controlled signage, interconnectivity, sidewalks, and extensive landscaping. The GRC is intended to serve the entire community by: • Better-managing the automobile-oriented nature of Greeno Road by limiting drive-up windows; • providing a mix of uses; • Encouraging retrofit of existing shopping centers by building nearer the right-of-way line • Prohibiting backlit or illuminated plastic signs, neon signs, and video boards; • Buffering residences from automobile-oriented uses through landscape buffers; • buffering surrounding neighborhoods from any adverse impacts of activities in the GRC; • requiring mandatory site plan reviews for all construction activities within the GRC; and Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 65 • Allowing certain specified uses only upon appeal to the Board of Adjustment and/or subject to special conditions. 2. Location and Size – LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO BE REFLECTED IN THE DOCUMENT TO BE CONSIDERD BY THE CITY COUNCIL 3. Applicability – This section applies to all new construction, demolition, Class III renovations, sidewalks, uses, private improvements, and landscape alterations of any kind occurring within the GRC overlay zones. The GRC overlays the underlying zoning regulations. The zoning regulations contained within the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance shall apply unless pre-empted by the GRC overlay. Where a conflict exists between the GRC overlay and the underlying zoning regulations, the GRC overlay shall prevail. Existing buildings and structures that do not conform to the requirements of the GRC overlay may be occupied, operated, repaired, receive Class I or Class II renovations, or otherwise continue in use in their existing non-conforming state unless demolished and rebuilt. Single-family structures occurring within the GRC overlay at the time of GRC establishment may utilize Article VII, Non-conformities as applicable. 4. Appeals and Variances – Appeals and Variances shall be subject to the same standards contained within Article, II, Section C.3. of this ordinance. 5. Allowable Uses Use Table – Table 3-1 includes seven categories of uses within the GRC: (1) residential; (2) civic; (3)office; (4) retail; (5) service; (6) manufacturing, and (7) rural. Within each category, specific uses are listed and indicated as either allowed, allowed subject to special conditions, or allowed by special exception. 6. Special Conditions for Uses within the GRC – The following special conditions shall apply to all applicable uses within the GRC overlay. These special conditions are in addition to the generally applicable standards that apply to all uses within the GRC overlay district. In the case of a conflict between the generally applicable standard for the underlying zoning district and the specific standard listed in this section for properties within the GRC overlay, the more specific standards in this section apply. A. General – applicable to all districts within GRC a. In addition to the requirements of Ordinance 1537, Signs, the following shall apply to all districts within the GRC i. Backlit or illuminated plastic signs are prohibited ii. Neon signs are prohibited iii. Video boards are prohibited iv. The GRC is designated a Beatification Area as contemplated by Ordinance 1537, Sign Ordinance. b. Mandatory site plan review i. All work as described in “applicability”, above, requires a mandatory site plan review within the GRC, regardless of whether or not it triggers the site plan review requirements of Article II, Section C.2. 1. Site plan review process shall be completed prior to approval of a building permit or land disturbance permit. ii. A landscape plan in compliance with ordinance 1444 shall be submitted concurrently with the mandatory site plan review for administrative review by staff. 1. In addition to the requirements of Ordinance 1444, tree and landscape ordinance, the landscape plan shall comply with figures XXXX through XXX, below, for the various districts. In the event of a conflict, the physical placement of the figures below shall govern. Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 66 a. Northern Edge District BUILD TO LINE I EDGE DISTRIC 10' SIDEWALK EDGE DISTRICT MULTI USE PATH Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 67 b. North Village Center (Parker Road) District VILL A GE DISTRICT BU ILD TOLINE MU LT I USE PATH 1 ~CAPE BU FFER 12 1 SIDEWA LK 5' LANDSCAPE BU FFER VILL AGE DISTRICT PARKING LOCATED AT REAR OF Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 68 c. Gateway District I GATEWAY DISTRICT EDGE OF ROW f' I -- I cJ··t. ·®r:,;- 1 • . j sir~ ----• .W-..-Jl!!!!!!!!!!!!!! __ ,_ O I • , LC&b I+ -;;;;.-.; I ' ,,,., 11-: .. Ji-c r -11.. I I I ' I - ! t . L. LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10 'O !o I EDGE OF ROW 1---------"t-G....._A_T-EW_A_Y _D_IS_T_R_IC_T....___ __ Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 69 d. Fairhope Avenue Village Center District VILL A GE DISTRICT BU ILD TOLINE MU LT I USE PATH 1 ~CAPE BU FFER 12 1 SIDEWA LK 5' LANDSCAPE BU FFER VILL AGE DISTRICT PARKING LOCATED AT REAR OF Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 70 e. Southern Edge District b tr • rl I BU ILD TO LINE I EDGE DISTRIC PATH EDGE DISTRICT Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 71 B. Uses – The uses allowable by the underlying zoning of each parcel within the GRC as indicated in table 3-1 shall be allowable within the GRC subject to the following restrictions and/or requirements: a. Northern Edge District 1. General – applies to entire district i. Stand-alone ice vending machines are a prohibited use ii. Stand-alone automatic teller machines (ATMs) are a prohibited use iii. Car wash facilities, both automated and self-serve, are a prohibited use 1. General Personal Services with Drive Through i. Drive-throughs prohibited 2. Bed and Breakfast ii. No more than 12 rooms iii. Must be owner occupied and operated 3. Hotel / Motel iv. No more than 30 rooms 4. Restaurant with Drive Through v. Drive-Throughs Prohibited 7. Dry Cleaner / Laundry with Drive Through vi. Drive-Throughs Prohibited b. Southern Edge District 1. General – applies to entire district a. Stand-alone ice vending machines are a prohibited use b. Stand-alone automatic teller machines (ATMs) are a prohibited use 1. General Personal Services with Drive Through a. Single drive-through lane allowable at rear of principle building 2. Dry Cleaner / Laundry with Drive Through a. Single drive-through lane allowable at rear of principle building 3. Bed and Breakfast a. No more than 12 rooms b. Must be owner occupied and operated 4. Hotel / Motel a. No more than 30 rooms 5. Restaurant a. Single drive-through lane allowable at rear of principle building c. Gateway District 1. General – applies to entire district and all uses within district a. Stand-alone ice vending machines are prohibited use b. Stand-alone automatic teller machines (ATMs) are a prohibited use c. Quick-serve restaurants are a prohibited use, including but not limited to the following: i. Restaurants offering no table service ii. Restaurants offering take-out or pick-up meals only iii. Food vendors operating via food truck d. Car wash facilities, both automated and self-serve, are a prohibited use e. Automobile Repair is a prohibited use Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 72 f. Automobile Service Station is a prohibited use g. Convenience Store is a prohibited use 2. Grocery / General Merchandise a. Individual uses shall not exceed 8,000sf per tenant 3. Two -family and Townhouses a. Shall be a minimum of two stories 4. Mixed use a. Ground floor retail/commercial/restaurant use shall not exceed 8,000sf 1. General Personal Services with Drive Through b. Drive-throughs prohibited 2. Bed and Breakfast a. No more than 6 rooms b. Must be owner occupied and operated 3. Restaurant with Drive Through a. Drive-throughs prohibited 4. Dry Cleaner / Laundry with Drive Through a. Drive-throughs prohibited d. Fairhope Avenue Village Center District / North Village Center (Parker Road) District 1. General – applies to entire district a. Stand-alone ice vending machines are a prohibited use b. Stand-alone automatic teller machines (ATMs) are a prohibited use c. Quick-serve restaurants are a prohibited use, including but not limited to the following: i. Restaurants offering no table service ii. Restaurants offering take-out or pick-up meals only iii. Food vendors operating via food truck d. Single-use buildings are a prohibited e. Car wash facilities, both automated and self-serve, are a prohibited use f. Automobile Repair is a prohibited use g. Automobile Service Station is a prohibited use h. Convenience Store is a prohibited use 2. Mixed-use a. Ground floor retail/commercial/restaurant use shall not exceed 8,000sf 3. Grocery / General Merchandise / Shopping Centers a. Individual uses shall not exceed 8,000sf per tenant 1. General Personal Services with Drive Through 1. Drive-throughs prohibited 2. Restaurant with Drive Through 1. Drive-throughs prohibited 3. Dry Cleaner / Laundry with Drive Through 1. Drive-throughs prohibited Article V Section H Special Districts Medical Overlay District FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE 73 1 ZC 19.09 303 Fels Ave. – July 1, 2019    Planning Commission    July 1, 2019    Zoning Change    Case:  ZC 19.09 303 Fels Ave.    Project Name:  ZC 19.09 303 Fels    Project Type:  Zoning Change R‐2 to B‐2    Project Acreage:  Approximately .4 acres    Jurisdiction:  City of Fairhope    PPIN Number:  37258    General Location:  One lot east of the northeast   corner of the intersection of   Fels Ave and Church St.    Engineer:  None     Applicant:  Anil Vira    School District:  Fairhope Elementary  Fairhope Intermediate  Fairhope Middle  Fairhope High     Recommendation:  Approval to B‐1 zoning in lieu   of the requested B‐2    Prepared by:  Mike Jeffries, QCI  City Planner     M~RPHY AVE Ltig•nd -MJ'<ll'llf Cl 'NOFFAlRHOPIE ZONING Zoong ~n_-,__,11:,..,, -l---,,1,---....L...,i.---li 11:..a,Jl:uOfftili l 'tftCMllll•Dllllllo 11:-1 1.,c1,..DtM(J's,,.;.,_,, ~ 11:11-11) 1U1ll j IU(c,) 2 ZC 19.09 303 Fels Ave. – July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:  The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property which is in the Central Business District (CBD)  from R‐2 ‐ Medium Density Single‐Family Residential District to B‐2 ‐ General Business District. The property  currently contains a home that is to be converted to a real estate office if the zoning change request is  approved.     Comments:  The subject property being in the CBD makes it appropriate for its underlying zoning to be commercial. The  subject property is bordered by R‐2 zoned properties to the east and west. The property to the east is Bay  Shore Ballet Academy the west side is the First Church of Christ Scientist. The property to the north is zoned  B‐1. This area of the CBD is a ½ block of contiguous B‐1 zoning on the west side between De la Mare St. and  Morphy Ave. The table below is an exert from Fairhope’s Zoning Ordinance reflecting the uses for areas  zoned B‐1 and B‐2. Staff believes a more appropriate zoning would be to B‐1 ‐ Local Shopping District. It  allows the office use requested by the applicant but also prohibits a few more uses than B‐2.   B-4-B 1- lfJ I- ~ :::e ::;, if) tr.! r--.----,---~- 1 I 11 I I I I I . l .1 I I $,C-0 11 ~ I ;ism~--J.-.---'---- ~---r--T -,-- ' I I I I I I I : I I I I- './) :c "u o:; ;? ~ ril I @§'-' -r---r---~--.----f: t--- I I 1-, I (/") :z 0 lc ---i'-----1 i== u lL! 1--------'L.--, lfJ '."") UJ " :=- I FELS AVE 3 ZC 19.09 303 Fels Ave. – July 1, 2019    Criteria – The application shall be reviewed based on the following criteria:  (1) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan;  Response: The requested zoning is B‐2 ‐ General Business District and  subject property is in the CBD which is comprised of mostly B‐2. The subject  property is in the Downtown Village per the Comprehensive Plan.   Therefore, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan  guidance in terms of a commercial use.      (2) Compliance with the standards, goals, and intent of this ordinance;  Response: The CBD encourages infill development, including shopping,  restaurant and entertainment, cultural and artistic institutions, offices,  government functions, and residential uses.    (3) The character of the surrounding property, including any pending  development activity;  Response: The surrounding property is primarily commercial use and  compatible to the recommended zoning change.    (4) Adequacy of public infrastructure to support the proposed development;  Response: There is a current structure that utilizes utilities.      (5) Impacts on natural resources, including existing conditions and ongoing  post‐development conditions;  Response: Subject property is already developed.     (6) Compliance with other laws and regulations of the City;  Response: At the time of any redevelopment all applicable laws of the City  will be applied.    (7) Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations of other  jurisdictions;  Response: At the time of a redevelopment all applicable laws will be  applied.    (8) Impacts on adjacent property including noise, traffic, visible intrusions,  potential physical impacts, and property values; and,  Response: Staff does not anticipate any significant issues relating to this  criterion.    (9) Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood including noise, traffic,  visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values.  Response: Staff does not anticipate any significant issues relating to this  criterion.             Z.....C1m\<1 L\esC'att-~ - 5""5c\iltS Y!!Jr)t.:~ • • Two-llmllv • • ,~ .. , • Pafollo111t 'Y •·==un lda,,,i/lttm H- !di"4-Slle • • ..lttt~ liwctlml' , • •-t, i.•--1.u,•va....., • • 5'c • • £<!<..,, ... f,c1,II' • • ··--• • ---· -~.l(t~'/,J!lbj;_ --·--~-0 0 -iul 0 u ""1•l ~ ~n.irt • • '"'m,.1~,-t • • Coc:mniz.in· C-•11.ta ot Cb'b 0 0 D.._I;~ llh'li-1"7'1\ 0 (J Offi<t r--' • • :Pro!tiSl«Uil ,-... . • Kor.it Otnrulion • • liwl -,-... -~ • • C'Ao~•Sll>lt • • • • I • ~-•C- Amome{me )!mu .'1Jl!!n o. 010 Ollldo« S&lt1 u.:.,.i II .... 6"1!" c,,.., --~ '""'~"'"'.,~"""''"°"' ~ 'o ',._, 0 (J Ooldo« Ria,'"°" F1<Eil1' DwCm I) 0 • • Motru.uTorF,mlU!P.,... .... Iodou'baun.O!I • • "·• P<r-""'1 ~orm l llfb&!ffl l!olil ,Molal 11 ! n(fflf er U6!!!11<n """"'"""1 VW<!t PIA R!!rllmm s.. Ulll'mmmm \!Cl! -l tmn.tlorAtimllHo<ffn l ,. __ ., I hd\"lldorS.lnn \:lld >- Ulll!o4 Lum ,_,,., f.ood Ploctue, ~~· A • tie:-.n •--m« W".:IZll 1'• ---I • -!lid 1"1,/ta IO 1"""1 ~ ILU>nlt OI "'" Cond.llQ<U. , P,.-,lirtl'd .,b;t<11> ,pt<lol coadticol i,"4 i, 1bl c,diw<, 0 illn,,1:kl ool)' "''""11 1111 IU\jto ., 'l"'"I ,-,,., 4 ZC 19.09 303 Fels Ave. – July 1, 2019  Subject Property looking northwest from across street on Fels Ave.      Subject Property looking northeast from across street on Fels Ave.      Recommendation:  Staff recommends case ZC 19.09 303 Fels Avenue be rezoned to B‐1 Local Shopping District not B‐2.    1 ZC 19.10 9979 Windmill Road – July 1, 2019    Planning Commission    July 1, 2019    Zoning Change    Case:  ZC 19.10 9979 Windmill Road    Project Name:  9979 Windmill Road    Project Type:  Re‐zoning R‐2 Medium Density   Single‐Family Residential   Districtt to B‐4 Business and  Professional District    Jurisdiction:  City of Fairhope Corporate Limits   Zoning District:  R‐2    PPIN Number:  77607    General Location:  Located on the northwest   corner of the intersection of   State Highway 181 and   Windmill Road    Engineering Firm:  S E Civil    Owner:  Provision Investments, LLC    School District:  Fairhope Elementary,   Intermediate, Middle, and   High School    Recommendation:  Approve    Prepared by:  Mike Jeffries, QCI  City Planner    ...:.@ .... u 0: w ,, f 3841'1 EL EANO R DR :i B-16 js-1;- ~ JB-1-4 38~1 3854 38:6 :t .75 4 J. 344 Subject Property ;J 4!;; '" WI NDMILL RD ' 69 4 I 5 1G 1 695 PUD • Pl al'n J..-/.38.s: De.teloprn e nt 1.503 1.543 CITY OF FA IRHOPE ZONING "-A Ru~rt1ti.l ,~no.iltijlt 0111,na .f:1. I LCIW0efl.MV $n11i:t.1• rri 1)1 l Rl l•I f'7 R1 1,1 RI (<} R.J: !.-tdumD•Ht)'$ngt•F•m1ily ,----------! -'R-J. H5111.0,r4ty'$1nglt-11nd y A.3, PGH P11:io,IG,arden$ir19ltf1111'I I :," D R-l TH, TOKIJIOUM Sfttie F1111 I )' -R~ t.owOetis.cyMLlll.._.:t..'11 t)f R.S H~hCltlUl'yQ'I.Hll!jl AU,idelldlll .R-6 IAaeieHCiffleP•Jt:Dl9.lria -e., li»eal SM~ttQIOlltrta 8-2 OtMt•l811lllntMtl'"'1a -8-3-1 Tlkl n.• Re,on Lod0f!OCl'19-'IIIO: -.S ,Jlt TCM.iff.11 RUOfl COffll'l'IHOll Set'\llCe Dllmcl -19,.4 Bu•nH1•n<1Pn:i:lntlONIOl Wiet 2 ZC 19.10 9979 Windmill Road – July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Provision Investments, LLC to rezone property from R‐2  Medium Density Single Family Residential District to B‐4 Business and Professional District.  The  property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 181 and Windmill  Road.  Comments:  The subject property is approximately 1.48 acres in size. The subject property is zoned R‐2 (Medium  Density Single‐Family Residential.   R‐2 Medium Density Single‐Family Residential District: This district is intended as a medium density  single family urban residential district, with lots of moderate size.  Article III. C. Dimension Standards  Dimension District or use Min. Lot Area/ Allowed Units Per Acre (UPA) Min. Lot Width Setbacks Max. total lot coverage by principle structure Max. height Front Rear Side Street side R-2 10,500 s.f./ - 75’ 35’ 35’ 10’ b 20’ 37% 30’ a   The requested zoning for the subject property is B‐4.    B‐4 Business and Professional District:  This district is intended to provide opportunity for  business establishments of a professional nature and is restricted to offices and businesses,  which provide specific corporate functions or professional services to the general public.     Article III. C. Dimensional Standards  Dimension District or use Min. Lot Area/ Allowed Units Per Acre (UPA) Min. Lot Width Setbacks Max. total lot coverage by principle structure Max. height Front Rear Side Street side B-4 None/ - none 20’ 20’ 10’ 30’ l                                     I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 ZC 19.10 9979 Windmill Road – July 1, 2019    The allowable uses in the B‐4 Business and Professional District are as follows:           7.o=! Ou!:>ct u,.., C a10ccr:., 'T ~ ~IC l;tu .:ri ,. S=,zt.-6caJy • T -• T-,.J,ou.:.. , ~H=- Mlllm>flmilr A»a:=ut ~ Ho- Mlacl'1Ll6 • Atce.M:IIY ~t , !i:i.ee C'n.'IC !S1mtt«:1tt ~? • ,.....,wv . , • :E.d;ca, c»ll f .-:,1::y • u~ • Pbao1" Cc::.imv !!onm:al 0 Plibli, 0oc, So~• • Co== n.-. $Dacca • Co . c -«Chb ?liblic \iri:!il'I' <7"1 CM!lc• Cia,anl • Prof .. i.=.al • Hcma Oc • -. I c:.-- Co..nc»-. Stu:. Cia,anl Mttdlcd: .. S!ac,.-:-... 1::a=,tc A=::obilit Sanica S:r.ic::i ~:4oc, s..1 .. ~=-:ad ~4-. S..l•t l.o: Gt.rdlll Ca:irc ...--- C . - c ~:.v am . if,.... 0 . Cli:lc 01:lw II~ f lali!T 0 D:r,ftti 0 Gainf.k'l>CIW Sirrioi M a . I t:0Cl 0 A -'fLJ.hw!-- ~LaaUS::I ·-· i"m:u!S.O~ ' ...... • .: H,..J ,~ ' ltlgtc=] \'all i'd • lilr fooromn1 Vu» .. ~ 01 .A=ll Hcffl!ll If . J:::ot Ymc: ~J!lu, Yid . l.=!iid 0 L.,,, 1111,(§ ~ ltt:nl Mm11 .J(·--.. ~- t Pormi:to.i ,:bj•ct t, !"''nl ordiJLms • 1tll1~ ud candit,,:_ , !'.,n...:ilt.d ,u~;o:t :o •1"""'1 co:>diiico, l,;i»J c, tt. m cco 0 M.itt<d only•• >p?tl ud .:b1oc1 rn <f«W cotdiriOD1 4 ZC 19.10 9979 Windmill Road – July 1, 2019  The surrounding properties are zoned as follows:    North: R‐A Residential/Agriculture District   South: PUD, (with office use)   East: B‐4 Business and Professional District   West: R‐A Residential/Agriculture District    Other zoning designations within the immediate vicinity include: R‐2 and R‐1 (Low Density Single‐ Family Residential District). The southeast corner of the intersection predominantly unzoned Baldwin  County.    Site Photos:      View of the subject property from the northeast corner of HWY 181/Windmill Road      Current businesses in the area:  The businesses in the general area include a restaurant (BILL‐E’s),  personal storage units, law and business offices on the southwest corner of the intersection, business  office on the northeast corner of the intersection and surrounding residential properties R‐1, R‐2 and  R‐A.     Zoning History:  Just south of Wal‐Mart, a parcel was re‐zoned to B‐4 on February 23, 2014, for  the purposes of a dental office, Advanced Dental Office. The site plan was approved in August  2015.     5 ZC 19.10 9979 Windmill Road – July 1, 2019  The property on the southwest corner of Windmill Road was rezoned PUD (Moorehaven PUD)  in 2003.  The PUD was initially addressed as an informal review and received positive feedback  from Planning Commission.  According to the minutes from Planning Commission meeting  regarding this development, multi‐family and only B‐4 uses will be allowed.  The PUD approved  included a gravel parking lot, two offices on front and 7 duplex units in the rear.  The two office  buildings were required to have a 2‐sided front so the back of the building did not face  Windmill Road. The building height was limited to a maximum building height of 30 feet  measured as defined in the Zoning Ordinance. The Lot coverage was limited as follows:   Lot 1  impervious area to be 13.2%. Lot 2 impervious area to be 13.1%. Duplex lot impervious area to  be 17.8%.   The application passed unanimously through Planning Commission on September 2,  2003 and through City Council on Monday October 13, 2003.      Another PUD, Ellington Place was located at Parker Court, near Eleanor Drive.  This PUD was  approved in August 2003.   It is a residential PUD with reduced setbacks and a higher building  footprint than typically allowed in an R‐2 residential zone.   Discussion in the staff cover letter  states that the “Density allowed at this location may not be a bad buffer from the impacts of  27, if it develops residentially or commercially.” The original PUD (approved on September 22,  2003) was proposed with storm water injection wells.  ADEM would not approve this method of  handling storm water so the applicant came back before Planning and Zoning in 2004 for a PUD  amendment change to alter the layout of the subdivision to reduce the number of lots, and to  move the storm water pond to the common area.   The PUD amendment was passed through  Planning Commission on October 11, 2004.    Fairhope Comprehensive Plan Guidance:   The subject property is located between the Fairhope  Avenue/Hwy 181 Village Node and the commercial node at Twin Beech Road and Hwy 181.   The   property is located approximately one‐quarter of the way between Walmart (Hwy 181 Village Node)  and the commercial node at the intersection of Twin Beech Road and Highway 181.  Highway 181 is a  classified as a minor arterial road.  There are currently commercial activities on three of the existing  street corners. The Implementation Matrix on page 48 of the Comprehensive plan supports approval of  commercial growth that is contiguous to existing commercial activity, thereby eliminating leapfrog  commercial development.  The subject property is being proposed as B‐4 zoning which is contiguous to  an existing B‐4 commercial parcel and business PUD, which would not present any leapfrog commercial  development.  Therefore, the application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.      Staff Recommendation:  Staff recommends approval of the rezoning from R‐2 to B‐4.  SIGNALEXISTINGGAYFER ROADALABAMA HIGHWAY 181ALABAMA HIGHWAY 181FAIRHOPE AVESIGNALPROPOSED273' ±1086' ±132' ±272' ±SIGNALEXISTING1011' ±COMMON AREA2.02 AC.±LOT11.05 AC.240' ±397' ±.DETENTIONAREADETENTIONAREALOT31.10 AC.190' ±400' ±401' ±541' ±208' ±23.20 AC±LOT142.31 AC.LOT152.62 AC.252' ±445' ±184' ±190' ±256' ±1965' ± TOTAL282' ±287' ±348' ±337' ±159' ±50' ±120' ±62' ±328' ±120' ±50' ±50'ROW50'ROW50'ROWLOT61.11 AC.220' ±387' ±LOT56.07 AC.546' ±266' ±651' ±LOT91.16 AC.LOT101.48 AC.LOT111.48 AC.LOT122.27 AC.LOT131.79 AC.268' ±248' ±241' ±50'ROW50' ±ROWLOT161.45 AC.175' ±208' ±268' ±231' ±50' ±50' ±64' ±61' ±120' ±50' ±504' ±120' ±50' ±COMMON AREA1.00 AC.±50' ±120' ±60' ±50' ±WETLANDAREAWETLANDAREA486' ±20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT2595' ± TOTAL190' ±249' ±20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT50' ROW50' ROW50'ROW75'ROW20' PEDESTRIAN, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT601' ±LOT41.74 AC.LOT81.03 AC.LOT71.05 AC.LOT21.08 AC.210' ±229' ±267' ±210' ±247' ±190' ±180' ±265' ±193' ±318' ±200' ±170' ±170' ±331' ±291' ±348' ±208' ±604' ±717' ±251' ±50' ROW60' ±60' ±50' ±60' ±59' ±COMMON AREA0.13AC.±COMMON AREA0.13AC.±UNIT 2UNIT 3UNIT 1UNIT BOUNDARYDRAWN BY: J.H.P. CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109KLUMPP PUD A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 1 GMC Project: CMOB190186 DRAWING FILE: P:\S7512\4810\ENGINEERING\CURRENT\PLANS\CURRENT CONCEPTUAL PLAN.dwgPLOTTED: Jun 24, 2019 - 3:14pm CONCEPTUAL PLAN Scale: 1"=100' 1 1 I I 0000000 ® 0 @ I I I I I I II II ) 1.___---l-----------[ I I I \ L _____ _J ---, -1 ---@ @ r----1 i : i I I i t-1--------,L -I--------I I ~ I I I I ~ I I I I I -@ @ @) -----@) (§) @ M----E:. @ @) -_L -@) @ ------.--,--------------------------r-------------------.-------■ -------.------------------7 I I I I @)@)@) @1 1@1@@@)@) @@@)@@)@)@@@)@) (§@)@)@)@) @. 1 -"-~-J U---~--~=~---L~~~~-~~_--L_ __ --~~--~~---~~~---~~-~~ ---,-1 I @): :@ I I I I I I I I -------_---_,--1,_-_-__ • __ ~~-:-:--~-':"'.--:':-~--~--=---~-~-:-:--~--:-:--=--=-~--:'.:--:-_:-: __ ~_:--: __ ~_~ __ :-::_-:-__ ~--=--~--~-':"'.--:":-':': __ =-=-:_~_~ __ ~_:-: __ ~_~ __ ~~7--;r~-~--:-:--~--~~-~--:i:_-:-_:-: __ ~-~--.:-:-~ __ :-::_-:-__ ~~-~~ro=~t:-,:-: __ ~ __ -: __________ ~_-----__ -_---II_ ........... .,.............-..... ~:..::---------------------------==-=.=.a ----1-1--== =-,a;a;,.......::..; '""''"""'""""'-----~ 'j-\ \ \ \ ' ' -' ' ~--l:?__:=.--=~=--=~ -=-=--=-;::===-=---=-====-=~======-::::::::: / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. I I : I : I I ---7 I I I I i 1-'-----:::=--=---=:__=:===--==--=---=====r '1 I ~ I ~ I I I ' ' I I -----/ \_ ------------·c'.3'· "-/ -NOTE: THIS LAYOUT IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND MAY BE ALTERED DURING THE SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. ----SCALE: 1"=100' CJ) .---0 N w z :::J ~ GAYFER ROADALABAMA HIGHWAY 181ALABAMA HIGHWAY 181FAIRHOPE AVE273' ±1086' ±132' ±272' ±1011' ±COMMON AREA2.02 AC.±LOT11.05 AC.397' ±.LOT31.10 AC.190' ±400' ±401' ±541' ±208' ±23.20 AC±LOT142.31 AC.LOT152.62 AC.252' ±445' ±184' ±190' ±256' ±1965' ± TOTAL282' ±287' ±348' ±337' ±159' ±50' ±120' ±62' ±328' ±120' ±50' ±50'ROW50'ROW50'ROWLOT61.11 AC.220' ±387' ±LOT56.07 AC.546' ±266' ±651' ±LOT91.16 AC.LOT101.48 AC.LOT111.48 AC.LOT122.27 AC.LOT131.79 AC.268' ±248' ±241' ±50'ROW50' ±ROWLOT161.45 AC.175' ±208' ±268' ±231' ±50' ±50' ±64' ±61' ±120' ±50' ±504' ±120' ±50' ±COMMON AREA1.00 AC.±50' ±120' ±60' ±50' ±486' ±20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT2595' ± TOTAL190' ±249' ±20' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT50' ROW50' ROW50'ROW75'ROW20' PEDESTRIAN, UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT601' ±LOT41.74 AC.LOT81.03 AC.LOT71.05 AC.LOT21.08 AC.210' ±229' ±267' ±210' ±247' ±190' ±180' ±265' ±193' ±318' ±200' ±170' ±170' ±331' ±291' ±348' ±208' ±604' ±717' ±251' ±50' ROW60' ±60' ±50' ±60' ±59' ±COMMON AREA0.13AC.±COMMON AREA0.13AC.±UNIT BOUNDARYDRAWING FILE: P:\S7512\4810\ENGINEERING\CURRENT\PLANS\CURRENT SITE PLAN.dwg PLOTTED: Jun 24, 2019 - 3:14pm SITE PLAN Scale: 1"=100' 1 1 DRAWN BY: J.H.P. CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109KLUMPP PUD A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 2 GMC Project: CMOB190186 I ---, -I ---, -I ---, ---, -I I -I ---, 0 0 I I ~ ~o ~ I ~lg 1 I I'> -I -0 I 0 I I I I I - ---- ---- -- ----- r--;r-----r -1 '"' ~ r - ~ I I I ® I I I ® I I I I I I ' II ~ I ~ I I I I ® I I I® I ' - -_) I l~--1--I L---I_ I '-- -I I I --J I I I ------------- --r I ,--_, ---- -® I I ~ I I i ! I ® I ~ I ■ I • @ I I I I i ® I I 111 I C I • ® i z ~ I I ~ ® I -I ---, I I ® 1~1 I I I • ® 111 I I ® I I I I I I i I ® I I I • J I I 11 1 I I I ® ; I I I I I --- -I ® --7 I r --I ® I • I I I I I I I I ® • I I I I I I II ® I I I I I I ii I II I I I 11 1 I I I I I \ I I I I N ) \ C,J N I " C I I ~-- C 11 I-----l / z z I \ -- -I -(/) ---, I )> r \ I I a------I --~ --ii r N -0 \ / ' ( ~ \ " 0 I 1 11 • I i I \ I I l I I \ \ \ I I I I I I I I I I ) \I I --> --~ -- i i T I I I ' I @) I I ' I I • I I 111 I I @1 I I I I I ' I @I ' I I ------------------------------------------------~ ®I ' I r ------------------------------------------------~ I I I I ! l @1 ' \ ' I @ I ' I i i I I @) I \ I ___ 1 ______________ I ~--______ -_-___ I I II I I @1 I ■ I , -®I -I • • @1 I I ' I \ I ' @ \ I I __ _J I I ®1 I I I I I I --I - ------- I I - - - --- I I I I I ~ I I I ! -J -------- I I --- JUNE I I I I I I I I I I ---_l_ - 2019 -----------7 :--------- - I I I : • : • ; • : I I I : . I I I I I ' - 2039 Main Street Daphne, AL 36526 T 251.626.2626 GMCNETWORK.COM ® ®1 I ®1 ®I I ®1 ® --- I - - - ---- 10 :e 10 I- :0 :e 10 10 I I@ 10 I I- f 1® I@ 1@ I® 1® f ~ ■ I- ® 1@ I® I ® 1--- - - I I- C ~I I • I- ll,.J - ---i ® \ @ \- @ I I@ I @ I I- I © i I @ f I ® I I © I @ I©~ I- I ® f I ® I I ® I ® I I I ® I ® I I- I® I I ® ~ ® I ~__J ------l- I- ~ I , TABLE 2DRAWING FILE: P:\S7512\4810\ENGINEERING\CURRENT\PLANS\CURRENT SITE PLAN.dwgPLOTTED: Jun 24, 2019 - 3:14pm NOTES NO SCALE 2 2 DRAWN BY: J.H.P. CHECKED BY:sheet ofA EDGFH12346578109BC12346578109KLUMPP PUD A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 2 GMC Project: CMOB190186 2039 Main Street T 251.626.2626 G M C N E T W O R K . C O M Daphne, AL 36526 1  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019                                                    Planning Commission  July 1, 2019  Zoning Change  Case:  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD  Project Name:  Klumpp PUD    Site Data:  Unit 1 – 28.79 acres +/‐  Unit 2 – 23.20 acres +/‐  Unit 3 – 14.11 acres +/‐   ROW –   9.83 acres +/‐    Project Type:  Conditional Annexation to PUD    Jurisdiction:  City of Fairhope Planning   Jurisdiction    Zoning District:  Unzoned Baldwin County   Planning District 14     PPIN: 236701, 24160, 316793     General Location:  Northwest corner of Fairhope        Ave/CR 48 and State HWY 181      Engineer of Record:  Goodwyn, Mills, and Cawood    Owner:  Gayfer Village Partners, LLC     Developer:  Mr. Tom Mitchell     School District:  Fairhope Elementary, Middle,  and High schools     Recommendation:  Approve with conditions     Prepared by:   J. Buford King,   Development Services Manager   n; Ft,sldontbJ Reecn C°'""1ero,1_15....,,:~c"""" l!utllt!Mill 3nd1lroHsionaliDl5tJEf , Ug!lllndl..: •I Oi- l Po!l:r.; 2  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:  The applicant is seeking concurrent annexation and rezoning of approximately 75.93 acres +/‐ from unzoned  Baldwin County to the City of Fairhope as a Planned Unit Development (PUD).  The subject property is located at  the northwest intersection of State Highway 181 and Fairhope Avenue/County Road 48 and extends north to the  southwest corner of State Highway 181 and Gayfer Avenue/County Road 30.  The subject property is bordered  to the northwest by the adjoining White Grove subdivision, zoned R‐2 medium density single family residential,  and bordered to the southwest by the adjoining PPIN 14493 zoned R‐A residential agricultural. The subject  property adjoins Idlewild Subdivision (R‐2) to the south, separated by the Fairhope Avenue right‐of‐way (ROW)  as well as various properties comprising the southwest intersection of Fairhope Avenue and HWY 181, all zoned  B‐2 general business district.  All remaining properties adjoining subject property are separated from subject  property via ROW and are located within unzoned Baldwin County Planning District 14.        Comments:  The subject property is comprised of one large (PPIN 236701) generally rectangular parcel fronting AL HWY 181,  Fairhope Avenue, and Gayfer Road Extension, all paved, publicly‐maintained streets.  PPINs 24160 and 316793  are inclusive of PPIN 236701 and will likely become functions of a future subdivision.        The site plan supporting Case number ZC 19.13 is included above in excerpted form and color‐coded to reflect  the “units” proposed for the PUD.  An approximate acreage breakdown on each unit is included on the cover  page of this staff report, and the lots and lot size acreage of the lots within each unit is included in the site plan  drawing.  The proposed uses of the various units are noted in the chart on the following page, which is an  excerpt from the site plan provided with subject application.  The structures indicated in the site plan are  conceptual only and not requested for inclusion in the PUD Ordinance.  Supporting Drawings 1 of 2 and 2 of 2  are requested as exhibits to the PUD ordinance.  The color‐coding of the site plan is coordinated with the use  chart shown at the top of the next page:  I I I u~ ''i J I -_-.:_: __ 1 3  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019     Unit 1 (28.79 acres +/‐) contains 16 lots with allowable uses and lots sizes identical to B‐2 General  Business District Zoning.  The developer requests, via inclusion of drawing 2 of 2 in the PUD ordinance,  self‐imposing the Site Plan Review procedure as included within Fairhope’s Zoning Ordinance.   Unit 2 (23.20 acres +/‐) depicted in light red identically replicates the use of R‐5 High Density Dwelling  Residential (10 units per acre, for 2323 units total) but requests the lot size shown on the site plan  drawing 1 of 2 in lieu of the allowable number of dwelling units included within Table 3‐2 in the City of  Fairhope Zoning Ordinance.  Similar to Unit 1 each lot in unit 2 will be required to follow the Site Plan  Review procedure included in The City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance as a self‐imposed requirement of  the PUD.    Unit 3 (14.11 acres +/‐) depicted in light green contains 77 residential lots modeled after an R‐3 zoning  district with modifications that reduces the minimum lot size and increases the allowable lot coverage.  At the time of development activities unit 3 shall follow the City of Fairhope’s Subdivision Review  Process and comply with the current Subdivision Regulations in addition to the requirements of the PUD  ordinance.   Article II Section C.1.e Criteria   Fairhope’s Zoning Ordinance contains nine (9) criteria by which an application for re‐zoning shall be  reviewed:  (1) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; (2) Compliance with the standards, goals, and intent of this ordinance; (3) The character of the surrounding property, including any pending development activity; (4) Adequacy of public infrastructure to support the proposed development; (5) Impacts on natural resources, including existing conditions and ongoing post-development conditions; (6) Compliance with other laws and regulations of the City; (7) Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations of other jurisdictions; (8) Impacts on adjacent property including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values; and, (9) Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values. The review comments for each criteria are discussed in detail below.  T AB LE l t,1~11 LOT1Sf lDNI~ AL LOWED OIIAINil,01; l;QA~AY p,lf!KING 01YQF C:ITY Qf f,lt.lflHJPE Af'PR:IVA4. PROC:E:5$ OltlENSION USl'.S AttD me FAJ MICJJE STMIDMDS DErENOON CONPA.EHEN!iVE fl.AN COMP LI ANCf 1 1-16 B-2~ .._,a 5tian Ile designed and constructed in • See Anicle IV-E Pi:ifii:i n-g of Yesk In accordance with Article II -Pr oCEd1..1 res. oft~ Fclrhq:le Zoning Ordir,ance, aocordance \Mth Artide IV-F , Stonnwater (s« To bfe zo/ th@ Fairhope Zeni~ each lot of Uni f 1 shall follow the Site Pl an ReviewProcech.res. Thi:s process Man.gement of the Fairtope zoi;ng PWI Ordinance1 requ ires, in general-. the foUo'Mng neps: Ordi nance" 1. Subm ittal ot Sit@ Plan Appli catiort by appl.ican t 2. Detennrlation by Director of P1anning and Bu il ding that the- applicalion 5. complete 3 . Review and recommendation bv Pl:ann.inc Commission with optional f>ubJ ic Hear~g 4. Fi n aJ derision by Citv Council , 1 R-!ah R---5' 511~0 cu• crtlwt-ed illr•tH'or,s-vuc.tHI 10 tl,C s~" Artli:'I, 1\1'-f P-1,~.'"' ot v .. ,/• lo ~cc«iJ.tN".f'-w1rh A.,11,·1~ II -P,nu>dur~ of r l~ F-~th«I" lutm11e Ordt,1,1M<..,.., <C.10 tlol 1'-t' Wth Anlt.lti r\/•F-, Slon•(Wlh ... t (~ ro.tik ~of I LWf r,1tn.1~,. ;1) 11"4 DiLd'l lnt nr Utlll 2 :hnfl (olli>v.' 11,1 91..-P1~n R"l' ... h?..:vProcl-du,,;-.. Thr\ p1·ocr \ Man' t1"1r1•nL0r1t1II!' F-lrroDe lonna ll<'tJNn:"' M.DJ Ordinance-I rn~ulrci, 1'1 ~P.t1.-r<M, the fL,PD1;1,•n& Jh-'I}&.; 1 -<.i.1bm ~t.il or~lte Plit" APflllr,H,n" llV •1mlM.ird ' OP':P'tfllln l ion by Plr..oorof ~bi1111l~R il"t.t Bt.1lld,n1 tha1t lhP 1pptk:.11 inn•~ o>ml)•etei l R"'"""w :inC, lt'"f'.orr11•t1f'nd1T.::,n b\l fJ"~1nolr~ C.On-t,11-.wmw1rh ~ptior1,d P ~~I c 1lem•O£ 4 l"tr•JI dtciS'(.lrt \Iv c.rw OJ.u•W• 3 1-n ~.3c ~-3t Sha ll be cte-sr~ed andccnstruc:tENI in A See Article IV•E Parki"' of 'iesk tn accordance ""'ith Attlcle-lV-Procedu,e fo1 f>laL Awro-rat cf thl! Fai rhq:,e and accordant!!: \Mth Artide V-F. 'Stol'lnwcJter (Stt To.blo!" 2 of ttie F:airllofe ZDn i ~ Subdi'lision Re_g:ulatio0$. Uni:t 3 shalJ f t>Uow the Subdi'w'iS:ion Re-vil!W Collllmon Standards of Ille Fa i rhooe s.ubdivision ''UO) Ordinance Procedure~. This p,0ces-s «qui res,.,,. gene.ral ttie. following ste'ps:: A rea Rto.eulatton~" L Submitta I of Preliminary Plat Applitation by a pp,Han,L 2. Deterre!natio nby Direct.or of Planning and Bui k:li nJ that the appHc.K.ionh comple!te 3. P,annl11 g comn,,ls.slon Pubic Hea rt11g and rtvi('W 4 . Plannin g Commh,Jlor, dt!d!ioo 5. Pre,,-C0 llUrllction CDnruot!:rJ::~ 6, Up,o,i m.mok!tion of CQ'IS.truct.Jun, 1he aJ;1pfica nt w timits a fil'lal Plat App.llait1611 I 7. De t @r111i natl o n b'I' the Dfrector of Ptannng an d 8ulk:iin11 t h¥ the -ci!pplicatJon b complete .. Flnal dtciS:On tiv Pianfllrnt: commrs.Jiot1 4  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019  (1) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; Response:  Fairhope Comprehensive Plan Guidance  In 2015 the Comprehensive Plan was updated to reflect what the community and citizens of  Fairhope desired and envisioned for the city. “the planning process used to develop the  Comprehensive Plan update was one that was built on extensive public input and collaboration.  The final product represents a consensus of what the people of Fairhope said was important to  them, what they saw as the future of Fairhope, and what they would like Fairhope to achieve.”  To sum up the process several public meetings, Town Hall meetings, and surveys were  conducted to gather input and information from citizens. From this data gathered four land use  plans were created and presented. A Preferred Plan Map was created. An exert of the Preferred  Plan is below showing the desired Village Center at the intersection of Fairhope Avenue and  Highway 181.    “Highway 181 / Fairhope Ave presents an additional village opportunity. While this area has  seen a growth of large retailers in the recent past due to regulatory limitations (i.e. significant  property located outside of the City Limits in unzoned Baldwin County), it is in the early stages  of village pattern development. River Mill Subdivision is connected to both Fairhope Avenue  and Windmill Road. The residential areas around Gayfer Avenue and Blueberry Lane are built in  accordance with the City Subdivision Regulations and provide neighborhood level greenspace,  sidewalks, streets, trees, and connectivity. While this area will evolve over time, the “bones” of  a village are generally in place.”    5  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019          (2) Compliance with the standards, goals, and intent of this ordinance; Response: PUD Planned Unit Development: This district is intended to encourage innovative development that meets comprehensive plan goals and is tailored to the unique constraints and conditions of a particular site. This district allows flexibility in uses, designs, and building layouts as opposed to other zoning districts to better serve community needs. This development appears to meet  the definition of a PUD and the intent of this ordinance.    (3) The character of the surrounding property, including any pending development activity;   Response: The comprehensive plan describes a village center at this location and states that the “bones” are already in place. The surrounding properties are unzoned, RA, R-2, and B-2. The transition of use and density follow the guidelines in the comprehensive plan and show no foreseeable negative impacts. (4) Adequacy of public infrastructure to support the proposed development;   Response: Fairhope Public Utilities can be made available during the subdivision process.     (5) Impacts on natural resources, including existing conditions and ongoing post-development conditions;   Response: Wetlands are present on the subject property and all wetland delineations, reports,  ordinances, and buffers will required during the development process.    .Cc::::::::::Jc::::::::IC R0.'6 QCICC>CC:CCC~O fftA.&. -O'TY ....,.,. FAl RHOPE A V E. 6  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019  (6) Compliance with other laws and regulations of the City;   Response: At the time of development all applicable laws of the City will be applied.    (7) Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations of other jurisdictions; Response: At the time of development all applicable laws will be applied.    (8) Impacts on adjacent property including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values   Response: Staff does not anticipate any significant issues relating to this criteria.    (9) Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values.    Response: Staff does not anticipate any significant issues relating to this criteria. A traffic study will be  required at time of subdivision. All required buffers and setbacks will apply to address any concerns.  Unit 1 and 2 have a self‐imposed mandatory site plan review requirement that will again address the  above concerns. Additional Zoning/Comprehensive Plan/Development Staff Comments       “The immediate areas around Villages are to be more dense (more units per acre) and then transition to  lower density development patterns.”     This village center as contemplated by the comprehensive plan already has the “bones” of a village in  place. The proposed PUD reflects a multi‐use development with a density transition becoming less  dense farther from the village center and more dense closer to the village center.     The village center will be comprised of commercial parcels in Unit 1 with the same allowable uses as B‐2  General Business. Unit two is a residential equivalent to R‐5 High Density Dwelling Residential and is  bordered by Unit 1 on three sides, and Unit 3 on the west side which is equivalent to (with  modifications) of an R‐3 High Density Single Family Residential development.     The surrounding properties are primarily zoned R‐2, R‐1, or unzoned Baldwin County in Baldwin Count  Planning District 14.     The southeast corner of the Highway 181 / Fairhope Ave contains an existing Wal‐Mart Supercenter  retail store with additional retail/service uses included on outparcels fronting upon State HWY 181.     Currently this site could be developed utilizing the building permit/subdivision/multiple occupancy  project (MOP) process, however the City of Fairhope would not have regulatory authority over land use.     Zoning Aerial with Inset Site Plan  7  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019                Aerial with inset Site Plan    8  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019                        Site Photos  Subject property looking northwest from HWY 181/Fairhope Ave Intersection  9  ZC 19.13 Klumpp PUD – July 1, 2019    Subject property looking west from HWY 181    Recommendation:  Staff recommends Case # ZC 19.13, conditional annexation to Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning  District for PPIN’s 236701, 24160, 316793 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions and  forwarded to the City Council for consideration:  1. A master drainage plan shall be prepared for the entire site and included with the initial  subdivision application creating units 1‐3  1          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019                                                    Planning Commission  July 1, 2019  Multiple Occupancy Project  Case:  SD 19.09 Pier St. Marketplace  Project Name:  Pier Street Marketplace    Site Data:  Lot 1 ‐ 0.20 acres +/‐    Project Type:  Multiple Occupancy Project (3 units)    Jurisdiction:  City of Fairhope Corporate Limits    Zoning District:  Tourist Resort Commercial Service      District    PPIN: 16630     General Location:  Northeast corner of Pier Street and  S. Mobile Street intersection       Engineer of Record:  S.E. Civil Engineering, LLC    Owner:  Wise Properties, LLC    Developer:  Mr. Henry “Sandy” Wise    School District:  Fairhope Elementary School   Fairhope Middle and High Schools     Recommendation:  Approval with conditions     Prepared by:   J. Buford King,   Development Services Manager   R., LowO!fldyUUIJ.f11ml~ R.-S M'911 Oens:fy O-ling Reulenlllll To'-!riS Resi;u1 CQmrnero SC:MCe Oistrid. &uinns 11nd F«i:tl!iulOl'llll D19lr1cl Fi , lll)l'ltln011~11 •JOlscria 2          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of S.E. Civil, LLC on behalf of Wise Properties, LLC (Mr. Henry “Sandy”  Wise), for a request for approval of Pier Street Marketplace, a 3‐unit Multiple Occupancy Project (MOP).   Subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Pier Street and South Mobile Street.  The subject property consists of approximately 8,799sf, or 0.20 acres +/‐.  Mr. Larry Smith, PE of S.E. Civil, LLC  serves as the engineer of record (EOR) for subject application.      Comments:   MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY PROJECT CRITERIA  The following item are excerpts from the various checklists utilized by staff to evaluate subject application’s  compliance with the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance, City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations and other  relevant ordinances and are included here to provide relevant background and rationale behind staff’s  recommendation. Any items indicated in red italic text have been cured by the notations in blue text, or reflect  conditions of approval or justification for a recommendation for denial.       Article IV, Section C.1. Two (2) copies of the preliminary plat and two copies of all plans shall be submitted initially for staff review. ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: A copy of the plat on which the development will be constructed is included however a new “plat” is not required for approval or recording with an MOP development. Any routine replats required will be identified as conditions of approval.   Article IV, Section C.1.b.(12) Street lighting plan ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Please contact the electrical superintendent and verify if the existing pole-mounted light shall remain on the existing pole on subject property’s north end after the OHP lines are placed underground or if a new street lighting plan is needed through aid-to-construction. The EOR consulted the electrical superintendent and verified the existing pole-mounted streetlight shall remain in place. The overhead lines reflected on the plans to be placed underground are communications (telephone and cable television).   Article IV, Section C.1.b.(13) and Article V, Section D.5.a.(9) Tree protection plan for all required street trees or trees over 24” DBH. Tree protection fences shall be installed prior to land disturbance activities. (See Appendix G) ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Ordinance number 1444, Tree Ordinance Comments: As a condition of approval, a revised landscape plan reflecting the conditions of approval of Case number SD 19.09 as well as Municipal Court case number MC19-166 shall submitted for final approval along with the “for permit” plans.   Article IV, Section C.1.b.(17) Site data box including but not limited to:  Total acreage of site  Acreage of common area(s) o Greenspace requirements of Article V, Section “C” are now applicable to an MOP per resolution 2018-02 effective 11-28-2018  Total number of lots  Square footage of each lot  Site Density  Number of units proposed ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: The greenspace requirements of Article V, Section “C” are not enforced for this application but will be enforced for all applications to be considered beginning with the March 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Subject application was submitted in December 2018 during the adoption period and is not enforced for subject application due to the application’s submittal proximity to the adoption of resolution 2018-02. I I I I I I I I 3          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019  Article IV, Section C.1.b.(18) Applicants shall provide site data and all applicable permits relative to items such as soils, wetlands, flooding, drainage, natural features and potential archeological features. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Subject property falls within an “AE” flood zone as seen in the map excerpt below. Please contact the Building Official and verify any additional permitting or site requirements that may be needed for the site. The EOR correctly remarked the image at right pre-dates the April 19, 2019 adoption of FEMA’s latest flood maps, as this initial review was conducted in January 2019. The 04/16/2019 flood map shows the area of subject property having 0.2% chance of an annual flood hazard, though a small portion of subject property falls within an AE flood zone. This review assumes the site will be vetted by the building official during the building permit process.   Article IV, Section C.1.c. Street Plan Requirements: (1) Location of existing and proposed streets within and adjacent to subdivision (2) Widths and purpose of existing and proposed rights-of-way (ROW) and easements (3) Clear identification of ROW and location of any street included in Master Plan (4) Proposed curb radii for each street intersection or significant street curves (5) Proposed street names (6) Typical section for proposed streets, centerline profiles of all proposed streets with finish grades, at a scale of: 1"=50' horizontal and 1"=5' vertical, or 1"=100' horizontal and 1"=10' vertical ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: No new streets are proposed by subject application.   Article IV, Section C.1.g. State or County ROW detailed highway improvements plan: ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: The Engineer of Record (EOR) provided correspondence indicating the trip generation of subject development does not warrant a traffic study. As a result, no improvements to the level of service of the streets or roads servicing subject property is required.   Article IV, Section.D.1.a. Maintenance Bond a. Either a financial guaranty (in the form of a maintenance bond) in an amount and form acceptable to the City Council as a guarantee for the installation of required improvements or the determination of the City’s General Superintendent that all required improvements have been installed to the City’s requirements. ☒N/A with comments ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: No improvements to be dedicated to the City of Fairhope are proposed requiring a maintenance bond.   Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(18) Final Plat and Final Plans showing all information required by and meeting requirements of Article IV., Section C.1. and the following additional information: (18)The engineer shall perform the supervision of construction; the final plat shall have the following engineer’s certification: “ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATE” “I, the undersigned, a Registered Engineer in the State of Alabama holding Certificate Number ______, hereby certify that I have designed the within improvements in conformity with applicable codes and laws and with the principals of good engineering practice. I further certify that I have observed the construction of the within improvements, that the same conforms to my design, that the within is a true and accurate representation of improvements as installed and that said improvements are hereby recommended for acceptance by the City of Fairhope, Alabama. 4          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019  ____________________ Project Engineer ____________________ Date ____________________ Name of Project to which the Certificate Applies Plans which are certified consist of Page _____ thru _____, each of which bears by seal and signature.” ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒ Follow-up information required as a condition of approval Comments: Subject application is an MOP not requiring final plat approval normally required for a typical subdivision. As a condition of approval, an as-built set of all construction documents shall be furnished, with the engineer’s certificate above reflected on the cover page, at a time to be determined by Building Official and Development Services Manager. The City of Fairhope reserves the right to modify the submission requirements of this closeout item at the direction of the Development Services Manager.   Article V, Section F.3.a.(3)(a)(1) Storm Water Standards – Submittal Requirements - Minimum Requirements-Drainage Plan a. Minimum Requirements - All proposed subdivisions shall demonstrate compliance with this Section F., these Regulations, and all applicable state and federal laws and regulations by submitting a minimum of two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy of the following plans and calculations ☐N/A ☒Accepted with comments ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Article V, Section F.3.b. Adverse Effects Comments: The drainage narrative provides data explaining how post development flows are equal to or less than pre-development flows. Pre and Post- development stormwater flows are summarized in the chart at right.   Article V, Section F.3.a.(3)(a)(3) Storm Water Standards – Submittal Requirements - Minimum Requirements- Operations and Maintenance Plan (3) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan and Agreement for maintenance of detention facilities and other storm water quantity and quality BMPs during development and documents providing for continued inspection and maintenance after completion of development and sale of all lots, such documents running as a covenant with the lands. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Though the subject application does not propose retention/detention facilities onsite, an LID narrative describing the TSS removal of proposed LID techniques was not furnished. Therefore, it is not known if a formalized O&M plan is required for the site. Please clarify the O&M requirements of the proposed stormwater / LID system to be utilized for the site and provide a formalized narrative for review if required. The EOR provided a narrative verifying post development flows of stormwater are less than or equal to (less than for all storm types) for the site and two LID techniques, as well as compact parking spaces is included on the site. The EOR cross reference Article V, Section F.7.a. and further-clarifies onsite detention/retention, and thus LID treatment, is not required for the site as the site is less than one acre.         I I - I I Event Existing Proposed Decrease (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2 1.38 1.30 0.08 5 1 .65 1.55 0 .10 10 1 .88 1.78 0.10 25 2.21 2.08 0 .13 50 2.47 2.32 0.15 100 272 2.55 0.17 I I 5          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019  Article V, Section F.7.a. Storm Water Standards – Detention and Retention Facilities a. The purpose of storm water retention and detention is to protect downstream properties from increases in flood heights due to development. A combination of storage and controlled release of storm water shall be required for road construction, non-residential developments of one acre or more, multi-family residential developments of one acre or more, and single-family developments of three acres or more. The requirement for a combination of storage and controlled release of storm water is not required for minor subdivisions; however, if the Planning Commission deems that the intensity of the development could cause off-site storm water flow impacts during or after development, a combination of storage and controlled release shall be required site can sometimes exacerbate flooding downstream due to peak flow timing and/or the increased. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: No onsite retention or detention facilities are proposed or subject property. The Public Works Director requests follow-up information inquiring if an orifice plate should be installed into DIA#1 or DIA#2 to provide inline, onsite stormwater storage (and possible credit as an LID technique for in-line storage). The EOR reiterates the site requirements of this section are not triggered by subject property (less than one acre) and therefore onsite storage and treatment is not required. Article V, Section G. Planning Design Standards-Upsizing ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Follow-up information requested. Comments: Please contact Mr. Richard Peterson, PE, Director of Operations, Fairhope Public Utilities, to determine if any upsizing requirements are needed for subject development. The EOR verifies via follow-up correspondence the proposed development will comply with any upsizing requirements determined by Fairhope Public Utilities (likely identified in the permit process).   Article VI, Section D. Construction Standards-Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be installed on all streets within the planning jurisdiction of the City of Fairhope, except on those streets which are eligible for the rural design standard expressed in Table 5.3, Appendix A of these regulations. On streets requiring sidewalks, concrete sidewalks which meet the City's standards and specifications expressed in Chapter 19 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended shall be installed. Sidewalks shall be designed and installed in accordance with good engineering practice. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Chapter 19 of the City of Fairhope Code of Ordinances, as amended. Comments: No sidewalks in the ROW are included with the development plans related to subject application. Please coordinate sidewalk placement with the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. The EOR included a request for waiver from the sidewalk requirements of this section. Historically, the planning commission has required sidewalks, or pedestrian easements on most developments. With the removal of parking spaces along Mobile St., space is available in the ROW for the required sidewalks. As a condition of approval, the sidewalk waiver is not recommended by staff, though final approval is to be considered by the Planning Commission.   Article VI, Section F. Construction Standards-Water System a. All subdivisions shall have water service. The water service shall be provided by either Fairhope Public Utilities or an approved water service. b. Primary water service may be individual well type systems that have been approved by the Baldwin County Health Department and the Fairhope Public Utilities Water Department. c. All water systems constructed within a subdivision and all water systems constructed outside of a subdivision but servicing a subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with those certain “Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities” d. Water meters shall be placed inside the property line at the start of the utility easement. ☐N/A ☐Accepted ☐Revise and Resubmit per comments Cross Reference: Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities Comments: Pending comments will follow under separate cover. Water and Sewer Superintendent Jay Whitman has been advised this application is now under consideration and his comments are pending. As a condition of approval, the EOR shall reflect any additions or revisions to the plans as prescribed by the various Fairhope Public Utilities departments as needed on the “for permit” plans.     I I I I I I I I 6          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019  ZONING ORDINANCE CRITERIA – PARKING  Article IV, Section E.1-4. Site Design Standards-Parking 1. Intent Parking standards are intended to provide adequate access and vehicle storage for land uses, but also minimize negative impacts of large expanses of parking such as poor pedestrian environments, degraded community aesthetics, additional stormwater runoff from excess impervious surfaces, and under-utilized space. 2. Required Parking Table 4-3 is the parking schedule and represents the minimum required parking spaces for specific land uses. These standards shall apply in any district the use is allowed or permitted by special exception. These standards shall not apply to the CBD Overlay, where on-street parking is permitted. However, wherever practicable, businesses in the CBD Overlay are encouraged to provide off-street parking facilities. Any specific use or district condition in Article III of this ordinance shall apply along with the standards and conditions of this Section. Any area reserved for off- street parking in accordance with the requirements of this ordinance shall not be reduced in area or changed to any other use unless the permitted use, which it serves, is discontinued or modified, or alternate and equivalent parking space is provided to the satisfaction of the board of adjustment. 3. Compact Car Parking Requirement a. Compact car parking spaces shall be a minimum of 30% of the required parking spaces and no more than a maximum of 40% of the required parking spaces. Compact car spaces shall be grouped together to the greatest extent possible. Compact car spaces shall be designated by paint at the entrance of the parking stall. 4. Parking Dimensions and Size a. Standard parking lot dimensions shall be as in Figure 4-2. b. Compact car parking shall be as indicated in the chart in the zoning ordinance in paragraph b. c. Parking Lot Limits (1) No use shall provide more than 20% more than the parking required by Table 4-3. (2) Any parking provided that is more than the parking required by Table 4-3 shall be designed with a pervious surface approved by the City. (3) No off-street parking area in any area zoned for residential uses shall exceed 40 spaces. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: The proposed parking of ten (10) spaces satisfies the required parking of table 4-3 for both the office uses and residential uses. The two residential spaces, or 20% is in compliance with the use restriction of paragraph 4, above. Three (3) compact car spaces are furnished as required by paragraph 3, above. The revise and resubmit condition is created by the placement of seven (7) of the required 10 spaces in the right-of-way (ROW). Please see Article IV, Section E.5.7 for a detailed analysis of parking credits. Though the proposed parking spaces in the ROW creates parking credits, the credits are not sufficient to satisfy the required 10 parking spaces required by the development. Further, staff is concerned about the potential traffic safety hazard created by placing parallel parking along the section of N. Mobile Street. As noted in the comments related to Article IV, Section E.5.7, below, the parking requirements of subject property have been modified to reflect the now “8” required parking spaces for the proposed building. Conditions of approval are noted that, along with furnished revisions, cure the revise and resubmit condition.   Article IV, Section E.5 Site Design Standards-Parking-Parking Credits 7. Parking Credits A credit may be given to the requirements of Table 4-3 – Parking Schedule, under the following conditions: a. On-street parking within 300 feet of any lot line may be credited to the parking requirement at a rate of one credit for every two on-street parking spaces. b. Bicycle parking facilities within reasonable proximity of the main entrance may be credited at a rate of one credit for every five-bicycle parking spaces, up to a maximum of 10% of the required vehicle parking. ☐N/A ☐Accepted with comments ☒Revise and Resubmit per comments Comments: Seven (7) parking spaces are proposed for the development in the ROW, including three parallel spaces along N. Mobile Street and four (4) perpendicular spaces along Pier Street. As allowed by subparagraph “a”, above, 3 and ½ parking credits are available from the on-street parking proposed. Combined with the three onsite spaces proposed for the site, a total of 6 ½ spaces are provided in lieu of the 10 required. Revise and resubmit to provide the 10 required parking spaces. Coordinate parking requirements with the landscaping requirements of Ordinance 1444. Subject application has been revised to reduce the required parking to “8” spaces. A total of “11” spaces are I I I I 7          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019  furnished, with “7” spaces included within and partially within the ROW. As per previous correspondence, staff objects to the placement of three spaces in the ROW along Mobile Street due to safety concerns related to vehicles entering and exiting the spaces while attempting to merge into traffic along Mobile Street. As a condition of approval, the three parallel parking spaces along Mobile St. will be located onsite, where sufficient space for onsite parking now exists via relief to the tree/landscape ordinance granted by the municipal court judge on May 22, 2019, case number MC19-166. The EOR may wish to modify the placement of the allowable “3” compact car spaces to better-utilize the space created by relief to the tree, landscape ordinance. Further, as a condition of approval, the space within the proposed structure that appears to accommodate a golf cart or similar vehicle shall be noted to include bicycle spaces as indicated above to receive credit for one space.   The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. “Approval Standards”. Each of these  criteria is addressed below with either a “meets” or “does not meet” comment.  If any of the criteria is not met,  a denial will be recommended.    Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of  land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as  proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning  ordinance, where applicable;   meets  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks  Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;   meets  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;  meets   d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;   meets  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning  jurisdiction of the City.”    meets      Site Photos:             Subject property beyond looking northeast     Pier Street Park  Subject property looking west along Pier Street   L___I __ __JI 8          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019       Recommendation:  Staff recommends APPROVAL of case # SD 19.09, Pier Street Marketplace subject to the following conditions:  1. The sidewalk waiver is recommended for denial by staff, though final approval is to be considered by the  Planning Commission.  a. Should the sidewalk waiver not be approved by the Planning Commission the EOR shall provide  revised drawings and include them in the “for permit” plans depicting sidewalks in compliance with  Article VI, Section D. to be approved by the Public Works Director and/or the Development Services  Manager.    2. Ordinance 1444; Tree and Landscape Ordinance: A revised landscape plan reflecting the approved  modifications to Ordinance 1444 per Municipal Court case number MC19‐166 as well as the conditions of  approval of case number SD 19.09 shall be submitted for final approval.  Final approval shall be granted  by the City Horticulturalist and/or the Development Services Manager as component of the review of the  “for permit” plans.     3. Subject development is an MOP and not a typical subdivision.  In lieu of the final plat approval procedure  required for a typical subdivision, the closeout procedure for subject development includes the follow procedures  and/or documents:  a. One copy of the landscape as‐built drawings with a statement from the landscape architect of record  indicating the various landscape features have been completed as‐designed.   b. One copy of the as‐built site/civil construction drawings as required by Article IV, Section.D.1.b.(18) at a  time to be determined by Building Official and Development Services Manager when a Certificate of  Occupancy (CO) request appears to be imminent.      4. Zoning Ordinance Article IV, Section E.1‐4., 5, and 7.: The three parallel parking spaces proposed along S.  Mobile St. shall be located on‐site to relieve a potential traffic hazard. Relief granted by the municipal  court judge from the Landscape and Tree Ordinance created space on‐site for additional on‐site parking.     5. Article IV, Section E.5.7.: One parking space shown within the proposed structure that appears to  accommodate a golf cart or similar vehicle shall be revised to denote five (5) bicycle spaces to receive  credit for one full parking space.     6. The EOR shall reflect any additions or revisions to the plans as prescribed by the various Fairhope Public  Utilities departments as needed on the “for permit” plans.  Subject property looking north along                property line with PPIN 9475  Subject property looking south along           property line with PPIN 9475 _ ~ ____ I 1------==~1 9          SD 19.09 Pier Street Marketplace July 1, 2019    7. Revise the 45’ building height depicted in the site data table to 30’ or 35’ as applicable and as allowable  by the Zoning Ordinance Article III Section C. Dimensions Table 3‐2 for mixed use developments.  The  applicant is advised a site plan review may be required if a 35’ building height is requested, as required by  Zoning Ordinance Article II, Section C.2.a.(4).     The Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting at which this item was discussed may be viewed at the following  internet address:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VS18K9DEGw&list=PLEIyHeNjDeQCTYz8bS8dgmEo1QLHRTQti&index=3 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE SHEET C01 20180424 GPW DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 5/28/19 1"=10'SEALAFFIXREVISIONDATESITE PLANCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED ALL CURBED OR STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 4' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. TO ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR SITE WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES THE DRAWINGS. CONCRETE FOR CURBING SHALL BE 3000 PSI. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR PLANTING LOCATIONS AND ISLAND DETAILS. PAINTED STRIPING SHALL BE BRIGHT AND CLEAR. STRIPES SHALL BE PER PLAN AND PAINTED CURBING SHALL BE FORMED AND POURED CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED WITHIN HANDICAP RAMPS AND PARKING STALLS SHALL BE PER ADA REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED TO BE TRUE AND ACCURATE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. THE SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS IS SHOWN WITHIN THESE PLANS. ALL EXISTING ON CLEAN ASPHALT OR CONCRETE. THIS SITE IS ZONED B-3b. ALL ISLANDS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. NOTIFY CITY OF FAIRHOPE INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF EVERY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED GOVERNMENTAL A COPY OF THE APPROVED LAND DISTURBANCE PLAN AND PERMIT SHALL BE PRESENT ON SITE WHENEVER LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN REQUIRED R.O.W. AND MUST BE STORED WITHIN THE SITE. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ACCESS ROADWAYS CONSTRUCTED OF AN ALL WEATHER SURFACE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING 80,000 POUNDS GROSS WEIGHT SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE WIDTH OF THE ACCESS ROADWAY, DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE 20 FT PER STANDARD FIRE PREVENTION CODE, LATEST EDITION. ALL NON-HANDICAP PARKING SPACE LINES WILL BE WHITE. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKINGS USED ON THE SITE WILL CONFORM WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), FHWA, LATEST EDITION. REFERENCE THE SIGN CODES CONTAINED IN THE MUTCD FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. NOTE THE COLOR AND SIZE OF ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS, REFERENCING DETAILS IN ALDOT'S ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE. NO "PROTECTED TREES" WILL BE REMOVED, DESTRUCTIVELY DAMAGED, MUTILATED, RELOCATED, DISFIGURED, DESTROYED, CUT DOWN, OR EXCESSIVELY PRUNED DURING SITE PLAN NOTES AND CODES AS WELL AS O.S.H.A. AND ALDOT STANDARDS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE REGULATIONS FIRE LANES AND SIGNAGE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1 CHAPTER 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE SITE; INCLUDING UTILITIES, SURFACES, ETC. AND SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES THEY CAUSE TO NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY AND ANY UNAUTHORIZED DISRUPTION TO UTILITIES ON SITE AND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING UTILITIES AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS AND CROSSINGS SHALL BE FIELD EXCAVATED TO VERIFY LOCATIONS, ELEVATION AND SIZE. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DEVIATIONS OR CONFLICTS. TOTAL SITE ACREAGE = ±0.20 ACRES. REGULATIONS. INSPECTIONS. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. PROPOSEDEXISTING SITE PLAN LEGEND TRAFFIC CONTROL ARROW EDGE OF PAVEMENT STANDARD PARKING QUANTITY LIGHT-DUTY ASPHALT PAVING X" SYSL - X" WIDE SINGLE YELLOW SOLID LINE X" DYSL - X" WIDE DOUBLE YELLOW SOLID LINE X" SWSL - X" WIDE SINGLE WHITE SOLID LINE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE CONCRETE PAVING ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE SIGN ORDINANCE. 26. ALL SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE ZONING ORDINANCE. SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE ARRANGED AS TO NOT NEGATIVELY EFFECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. OFFICE (1,200 SF) PARKING DATA 4 SPACES FOR 400 SF+ TOTAL REQUIRED = PARKING REQUIREMENT SPACES 8 PROPOSED PARKING = 8* 1 SPACE/400 SF TO 5000 SF+ 1 SPACES/200 SF OVER 5000 SF 0 2 4 BUILDING (UNDER ROOF) SITE ANALYSIS 2,533 SF SITE ACREAGE (PROPOSED) ±0.20 AC (8,799 SF) BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: SIDE YARD: SIDE YARD (ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL): MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 20 FT 0 FT 10 FT 45' BUILDING HEIGHT ±35 FT PROPOSED PARKING 8 SPACES* REQUIRED PARKING 8 SPACES MAX. BUILDING SITE COVERAGE:---- JURISDICTION CITY OF FAIRHOPE PERVIOUS AREA 5,184 SF (58.9%) IMPERVIOUS AREA 3,615 SF (41.1%) REQUIRED: PROPERTY AREA LAND USAGE --8,799 SF = 0.202 ACRES BUILDING AREA 28.8%2,533 SF = 0.058 ACRES SITE AREA EXCLUSIVE OF BLDG 6,266 SF = 0.144 ACRES IMPERVIOUS PAVING EXCLUSIVE OF BLDG 1,082 SF = 0.025 ACRES DESCRIPTION % OF PROPERTY AREAAREA -- 12.3% ZONING B-3b PERVIOUS PAVING Pier Street MarketplaceDeveloper:Wise Properties LLC1 N Bancroft St. Suite A1Fairhope, AL 36532251-583-8968Contact: Sandy WiseROLL CURB X DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 27. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.28. REQUIRED TO LAYOUT THE BUILDING WITHIN THE FOUNDATIONS. REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE COLUMN GRID LAYOUT AND INFORMATION29. NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. 30. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR DETAILS.31. REAR YARD:20 FT RESIDENTIAL (2 UNITS, MIXED USE) 1 SPACE/UNIT 2 GRASSED/LANDSCAPED AREA 2,491 SF = 0.057 ACRES 28.3% PERVIOUS PAVING AREA 2,693 SF = 0.062 ACRES 30.6% PROPOSED UNITS 3 UNITS *PROPOSED PARKING IS CALCULATED AS 4 SPACES ON SITE. PIER STREET - CREDIT FOR 1 FULL SPACE (300 SF OF PARKING IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY) THE REMAINDER (THREE SPACES) IS GIVEN CREDIT AT 1 SPACE PER 2 SPACES EQUATING TO 1.5 SPACES. ON MOBILE ST THE THREE SPACES IS GIVEN CREDIT AT 1 SPACE PER 2 SPACES EQUATING TO 1.5 SPACES. TO SUMMARIZE: SITE - 4 SPACES PIER STREET - 2.5 SPACES MOBILE STREET 1.5 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED 8 SPACES (251) 990-6566880 Holcomb Blvd, Suite 2-FFairhope, AL 36532EngineeringCivil & SurveyingSITE DENSITY 15 UNITS/ACRE NO RED SOILS OR CLAY SHALL BE USED ONSITE WITHIN 100' OF CRITICAL AREA AS REQUIRED 32. BY THE RED SOIL & CLAY ORDINANCE NUMBER 1423. / / 0 HEADER CURB SEE DETAIL / 0 / / &.'<- / 9;-'<" p_'<} / ft 7, ~,. ~ COMPACT PARKING "• • ' ASPHALT PAVING'¾,~,, s(' / / ~ SEE DETAIL ~"· ~~ '\"" HANDICAP PARKING_, , '¾,"" / I /&.,,.. / '<" / R<ft .§ r-# , "' &~---: I I I I © ~ c,f> ,;'3 _,:f "" STAIRS, REFER TO ARCH PLANS PROPOSED 2 STORY BUILDING 2,533 SF FFE=12.00 4' CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAIL ., .· ;-- . .. . ; ) .,, ... . . . . •• ~ ~ ,11,.,__ .•.• -_ 9 ,; . 0 • __,,I .·.•·?, \_ "\ -) 20"0AK IL .• ·· •• ·• : .. · lo ..J ... ··. .5, , ' •. I!: • .' ·.: •• •. 40"OAK l • ·\''. ! • • ~\_-It-->,----., l.ij::----- .'.. ---~~• iri::DERCURB / SEE DETAIL '•·• TAPER HEADER CURB _.::::,...'2 '""· e ~ •. ··•· •• , ' , EE Dt Tr L OVER TWO FEET TO BE FLUSH WITH INLET TOP ( HEADER CURB SEE ~AIL / ' v( I I I BLOCK2 LOT 1 I I I I I I I I I I N 0 ~ l I l I l I GAie. 0 \~ \\\ \\II 11(111 0 ,,, Ni ,,, ,, ~,, "' ,,\, ,,,, ,.,"/ " ,, ,, ~ ~ ~ 't" ... ,' ~,, ~~ -... 0--.::-~.::-<,j ,-\ ,:: :: <;: -... = 0::::: I . -·. . ,: ... __ I -m-~ -<---.. -. = ..t."':. r.:, .,._ ~-,=: ~ ..>.~,?') lri ---~-2 I 4 I ~"J:. ... ,, ,,~~ ~,.. II \\\~\~ ,-:- ....,,, " 0/11 ,,, I::, 1,i1,,11,11 \\ \\~"q\: -iN1 1 cl OHPOHPN58°00'00"W87' PLAT125.00' PLAT & MSDS 58° 04' 26" E 100.21' MSDS 58° 04' 26" E 33.22' MSDS 2 0 ° 2 3 ' 5 6 " W 1 4 9 . 4 7 ' M S DBASIS OF BEARINGSALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES 4 1 ° 1 2 ' 2 4 " W 1 4 8 . 2 6 ' M S DP.P.P.P.P.P .WOOD FENCENORTH OF LINEGUY WIRESWATER METERWATER METERX X X X X X X X X REM N A N T S O F W I R E F E N C EFIREHYDRANT V A L L E Y G U T T E ROVERHEAD POWER LINESO V E R H E A D P OW E R L I N E S S 2 7 ° 5 5 ' 2 4 " W 1 2 5 . 0 9 ' M S D10 XXXXXXOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHP OHP OHP O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H P O H PTBM ELEV. 13.2699 101010 11 1 1 1 2111211 12 10CRSCRFWWWWWWWWWWWWS S S S S S S S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSUPTTSTOR.CRFCRSSS SS AeccDbA l i gnm en tM in or St a ti on La be l in g (A ec cL an d13 0 )PROPOSED BUILDING(REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL)PIER AVE.Refer to Civil for ALL grading,drainage, hardscape, & utilities.All areas disturbed by construction shall besodded, or heavily mulched as noted.Refer to Civil for All Grading, Drainage, ErosionControl, & Site Stabilization Other than shownon landscape plan. (Typ.)S O U T H M O B I L E S T .Refer to Civil for ALL grading,drainage, hardscape, & utilities.11Treesave Fencing (Typ.)See Detail #1 / L-1.1Treesave Fencing (Typ.)See Detail #1 / L-1.1HAND EXCAVATION ONLYAROUND EX. TREES. NO RUBBERTIRE MACHINERY OR VEHICLESSHALL PARK OR DRIVE INDRIPLINE LIMITS. LIGHT WEIGHTTRACK EQUIP. ONLY4" Depth of Hardwood Mulch Entireplanting strip along East side.Ex. Tree to Remain. Refer to City TreeProtection Ordinance and detail forprotection during construction. ConsultCertified Arborist prior to beginningconstruction to advise best managementpractices to ensure tree survivability.Ex. Tree to Remain. Refer to City TreeProtection Ordinance and detail forprotection during construction. ConsultCertified Arborist prior to beginningconstruction to advise best managementpractices to ensure tree survivability.PROPOSED BUILDING(REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL)Golden Globe Ginkgo2.5" Cal.1Sweet Viburnum7 gal11Big Blue Liriope1 gal107Slender Silhouette Sweet Gum30 gal1Platinum Beauty Breeze Grass3 gal4330 galTF Dahoon Holly111 galCreeping FigBig Blue Liriope1 gal57Sweet Viburnum7 gal7Blue Pacific Juniper3 gal78Platinum Beauty Breeze Grass3 gal5Golden Globe Ginkgo2.5" Cal.1Slender Silhouette Sweet Gum30 gal3Platinum Beauty Breeze Grass3 gal7Platinum Beauty Breeze Grass3 gal3Geo Zoysiasod704 sfBig Blue Liriope1 gal17Slender Silhouette Sweet Gum30 gal3All beds shall receive a 4" Depthof Hardwood Mulch. (typ.)All beds shall receive a 4" Depthof Hardwood Mulch. (typ.)FAIRHOPE, AL PIER STREET MARKETPLACEKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLANDSCAPEL-1.1JOSEPHHENRYCOMER IVNUMBER539REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARC HITECT S T A TE OF ALABAMASE A L N O T V A L I DUNLESS SIGNEDESPALIER, LLC.NORTHNOTES:1. BASE SURVEY PROVIDED BY S.E. CIVIL.2. LOCATION OF STRUCTURES, HARDSCAPE, AND EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BEFIELD VERIFIED.3. VERIFY ALL LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS IN FIELD.4. PLANT COUNTS ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. FIELD VERIFY ACCORDINGLY.5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING POSITIVE DRAINAGE.6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS.7. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES INDRAWINGS OR FIELD CONDITIONS.8. REFER TO ARCH. / CIVIL FOR ALL DEMOLITION, TREE SAVE/REMOVAL, UTILITIES,GRADING, DRAINAGE, & HARDSCAPE.TREE PROTECTION DETAILTree protection fencing shall be installed 20' from trunks oftrees larger than 20" DBH and 10' from trunks of trees under 20" DBH.4'-0"Maintain existinggrade with the treeprotection fenceunless otherwiseindicated on theplans.Notes:1- See city tree protection ordinance sec.20.5-6 for required tree protectionmeasures.2- No pruning shall be performed except byapproved arborist.3- No equipment shall operate inside theprotective fencing including during fenceinstallation and removal.4- Tree protection fence shall be installedprior to any landscape disturbance.5- No entry, storage, or temporary parkingshall be allowed inside fence.SECTION VIEW8.5" x 11"signlaminated inplastic spacedevery 50'along thefence.Tree Protectionfence: Chain link fence1DRAFT - FOR REVIEW ONLY PLAN0SCALE: feet816241/8" = 1'-0"SEE SHEETS L-1.2 FOR LANDSCAPE DETAILS.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL & CIVIL DRAWINGSFOR ALL HARDSCAPE AND STRUCTURES.0 NOT TO SCALE LA 32 f' ?'(. : __ /. . • .· .. I/ • •. '· . ·, . ·. I --. I ' : .:. -. . . _;' (2)1/--•. _ •• _ .• ;<-,-~ ~ -___ : _____ ?zj~~~-~c -. ---•. ' -~--·/--/ ·~. . ... -, .... . ··-/ / / . . . . . . / • • : .• -.. .·. · ... 0 , ;. . ·-. . ~ • • . •, . . -: ·-• . . • ' -·. .. ', .... -.:· . . . . . ·: ·-. \>•-•·-/ / / .,_: .. • '·. / :-. / , / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / • . . ·. · ... -·· . . ·-. /. -· -. • _ .. :: '.;-___ ,~":ft,,_'. ,:,t"";::,,I;:::.'t:. ~ / .:. : ·-./·: : .: : • ·: ·. . . A·:· .,.··· : .. : • •.. :·-_·_: . ~-. _: • .. : > .. _ ••. ··: . ·• ... .. </-~,:-•••/:\;· -. . f,, .. {:";s.~· J.,..;_tt----j ~ . '""" ;:~~ir} ,,c~J.>~o')J{~\ • .,V/r".,L, t.,,'' '"?_~~· ~-" • • 1----+---t 0 .. • ... ·~·•·.·' • _..: ·~.· ><:,{A,. . :· .•••. •. :-. . . . . . . . . . . -~ . -•. :_ -.:...:-.• • .•. '· .,. :• ":::: . . ., .. ,, ,: ... ,.: •. :•)· "·.'·. "•' ·: -.·_._ :_-·._: .. :_-_. ·:· '• ~ />} ::: ''." '.' / (l ; ·:c·:/:.:"·;;~·~:--'.'· / . : : •·· :_··:: ·.:: ·:;1:: :. ·;:::--l ·:_ .• •-.• .:: ·::. : i ... • .. )·· . ./ · .... ·· 1 . . .. ./\/, :•,iS.,., . · .. l ..... , .. \ ... ·.• • •. • -;' . • .. ,.· . : : . : :: . '' .><. / ;--: : ·., ·i:. -. : • ··: • . , .. :::·: >:.: <:.·:: :·: .•..•.• '.:.·:•.: . .··. l.. ~ / • -· I· •. •• -. . • • • 'I/ A/ .:·., ·:· /-:, --~ _/ M .·--: .. ··· ·-·. -.• . . .. : : .· /--. : ::,-.: .. r-~ ·:'_.~>-. -; <"> :· .. ·--~~ •,•, ! ',j,._ J • ''' .......... .......... ' ' ' ' I I I I I I /J ,......__ I \-./ ) J / ', I I j I I I I I \-........./ \ I I I I I .......... I I I I /-......... ~ .......... I .......... I I ESPALIER landscape architecture Espalier, LLC P.O. Box 1247 Fairhope, Alabama 36533 P: 251.454.3500 es pal ierdesign .com 500. ISSUED/REVISED SPR 12/18/18 Revised 5 24 19 SHEET TITLE DESIGNED B'f FILE NAME JC PIERSTMRK """"'"' SHEET JC CHECKED Br JC PROJECT NO. 1866 1),\1[ 12/17 /18 CITY OF FAIRHOPE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:PERIMETER REQUIREMENTS:Road Frontage Feet = 87'/30' = 3 Trees in First 25' regardless of tree credits.Remaining Perimeter Feet = 330'/30' = 11 Trees - 5 Credits = 6 Perimeter Trees Required.Total New Trees Required = 9 Trees (At Least 50% Overstory)NOTES:1. ALL TREE , SHRUB, & GROUNDCOVER AREAS TO BE MULCHED WITH 4" OFHARDWOOD BARK MULCH.2. THIS PLANT LIST IS FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY.APPROVED NURSERIES:1. GREEN FOREST NURSERY2. FLOWERWOOD NURSERY3. GREENS NURSERY4. CHERRY LAKE NURSERY5. POSEY & SON NURSERYOther nurseries may he approved at the discretion of the landscape architect.EXISTING TREE CREDIT TABLE40" Live Oak /8 = 5Total Tree Credits = 5NOTES:1. QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY.TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTREMARKSGG 2 Ginkgo biloba `Golden Globe`Golden Globe Ginkgo2.5" Cal.2.5" Cal. Min., 10` Ht. Min.City Required TreeHunter Trees 866-348-6837IC 3 Ilex cassineTF Dahoon Holly30 galSingle Trunk, 2" Cal., 10` Ht. Min.Cherry Lake NurseryLS 7 Liquidambar styraciflua `Slender Silhouette` Slender Silhouette Sweet Gum 30 galGreenforest Nursery, 2" Cal., 10` Ht. Min.SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZESPACINGREMARKSFP 11 Ficus pumilaCreeping Fig1 gal 60" o.c. Staked.JB 78 Juniperus conferta `Blue Pacific`Blue Pacific Juniper3 gal 30" o.c.LW 19 Lomandra longifolia `White Sands`Platinum Beauty Breeze Grass 3 gal 42" o.c.VO 18 Viburnum odoratissimumSweet Viburnum7 gal 60" o.c.GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMECONTSPACINGREMARKSLB 181 Liriope muscari `Big Blue`Big Blue Liriope1 gal 18" o.c.ZG 704 sf Zoysia x `Geo`Geo ZoysiasodPLANT SCHEDULESYMBOLDESCRIPTIONQTYDETAIL8` PTP Privacy Fence.149 lfHand dig post holes in existing tree root zones.1REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULEMULCH TREE RING 3" DEEP (TYP.)KEEP MULCH OFF TRUNK +/-2"SPECIFIED PLANTING MIX. WASH IN BACKFILL TOREMOVE AIR POCKETS AND SETTLE SOIL.4" SOIL WATER WELL ABOVE FINISH GRADESET TOP OF ROOTBALL 1.5" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.SLOPE SOIL AWAY FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE.FINISH GRADEUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESPECIFIED FERTILIZER TABSARBORGUY STAKING KITS OR EQUAL. INSTALLPER MANUFACTURERS SPECS AND SIZING.3 REQUIRED 120° APART.HIGH VISIBILITY FLAGGING TAPETREE PLANTINGARBORGUY ANCHORS TO BE DRIVEN INTOUNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. NOT PLANTING PIT.1SHRUB PLANTING DETAILNOTE:LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TOENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL DIRECTIONSAND AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES.SHRUBS TO BE PLANTED 1" HIGHERTHAN FINISH GRADE.3" OF MULCH AS SPECIFIEDSOIL BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED WITHFERTILIZER TABS AS SPECIFIED AT RATEPER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.LIMITS OF MULCH BED.EDGE OF SOD, WALK, OR CURBBUILDING FACADE OR WALL32" Min.o.c. spacingo.c. spacing32" Min.2 x Dia.of Rootball6" MIN.2GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAILNOTE:LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TOENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL DIRECTIONSAND AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES.PLANTING BED PER SPECIFICATIONS2" OF PINEBARK MULCH FOR ALL 4" POTSUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MULCH ASSPECIFIED FOR 1 GAL. GROUNDCOVERS.O.C. SPACING (TYP.)UNDISTURBED SUBGRADELIMITS OF MULCH BED.EDGE OF SOD, WALK, OR CURBBUILDING FACADE OR WALL3SUBGRADETRENCH BED EDGE3" OF MULCH AS SPECIFIEDCROWN MULCH AS SHOWN TOENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGEMULCH TO BE 1" LOWER THANFINISH GRADE AT EDGEFINISH GRADENOTE:TRENCH EDGE SHALL BE LOCATEDAT ALL SOFT AND HARD EDGES.1"3"3"4DRAFT - FOR REVIEW ONLY LANDSCAPE NOTES:1. This section covers furnishing and installing all landscape plants and non-plant materials covered bythe drawings and these specifications. The work shall include materials, labor, equipment and servicesas described herein and indicated on the drawings. Also, the work shall include the maintenance of allplants and planting areas until acceptance by the Owner, and fulfillment of all guarantee provisions asherein specified.2. Before beginning work, the contractor shall thoroughly acquaint himself with the existing siteconditions and proposed plans. The intent is to provide a smooth transition between existing conditions that are to remain and the new site features with minimal damage to existing treesand vegetation.3. Contractor is made aware of active existing underground utilities. It is the contractors responsibility to familiarize himself with the location of said utilities and other obstructions. Thecontractor shall investigate and verify, in the field, the existence and location of all utilities and anyexisting irrigation piping, and take necessary precautions to prevent their disturbance and avoidinterruption of service. Contractor is responsible for calling appropriate line location service. Alldamaged utilities shall be replaced to owners satisfaction by contractor with no additional chargeto owner.4. Discrepancies between site conditions and conditions on plans shall be call to the attention of theOwner immediately.5. Existing grades shall be verified in field prior to beginning any work. Discrepancies shall be broughtto the landscape architects attention immediately. Landscape contractor to provide fine grading toensure positive drainage. 6. The landscape architect shall have the right to reject any and all work and/or materials at any stageof progress which in his opinion do not meet the requirements of these plans and specifications. Suchrejected material shall be removed from the site immediately and replaced with acceptable materials.7. Landscape contractor is responsible for obtaining all state and local permits and licenses requiredto perform this work.8. Landscape contractor shall abide by all state and local laws and ordinances. Contractor shall alsoconform to POA or ARB guidelines if applicable.9. All work shall comply with the current edition of the Standard Building Code published by theSouthern Building Code Congress International, Inc.10. Topsoil shall be sandy/loam natural, friable, and fertile with a PH of 5.5 to 6.5. Topsoil shall be freefrom roots, stones, debris, noxious weeds, or any substance harmful to plant growth. Quality ofTopsoil to be approved by Landscape Architect.11. Once delivered to the site, the contractor is responsible for the protection, including theft, ofall materials.12. The landscape plan is to serve as a guide for installation. Field adjustment and changes to layoutmay be made by Landscape Architect.13. Contractor shall layout all plant material per planting plans and schedule a site meeting withlandscape architect for approval with a minimum of 48 hours notice.14. Quantities shown on plant list are for convenience only.15. All groundcover & flower beds shall receive 3" minimum of planting mix consisting of decomposedpinebark or mushroom compost and blended into the top 6" of existing soil. Rake beds smooth andtop dress with 2" min. of ground pinebark prior to planting.16. All tree and shrub planting pits shall be backfilled with 75% excavated soil & 25% planting mixconsisting of decomposed pinebark or mushroom compost.17. All trees shrubs and groundcovers shall be planted with Woodace fertilizer tabs at rates permanufactures recommendations. All planting beds shall also be top dressed with a slow releaseOsmocote fertilizer or equal per manufactures recommendations prior to mulching.18. All beds shall receive Freehand pre-emergent herbicide or equal.19. Unless otherwise noted, all beds shall receive 3" compacted depth of fresh Long Leaf pine strawfree from sticks and pine cones. Groundcover areas with 4" plants or plugs shall be mulched withpulverized pinebark mulch unless otherwise noted.20. All bed lines shall have 3" V-Shaped trenches. See detail.21. All plant material shall meet or exceed federal, state, and county laws requiring inspection for plantdisease and insect control.22. All plant material shall be Florida #1 or better and meet the latest standards of the "AmericanStandards for Nursery Stock".23. All trees shall be staked with arbor guy (or equal) tree stakes per manufactures recommendations.24. All disturbed areas shall be irrigated and sodded.25. Contractor shall maintain all plantings and lawn areas until final acceptance by owner and landscapearchitect. Unless specified otherwise, maintenance includes mowing, edging, weeding, blowing, pruning,watering, mulching, etc.26. Brown or defoliated plants shall be removed and replaced immediately.27. All materials and workmanship for landscape and irrigation shall be guaranteed for a minimum ofone year from final acceptance.28. No work shall be performed in any R.O.W. without approval by the appropriate Federal, State,County, or City authority.LANDSCAPE NOTES5NOTES:1. BASE SURVEY PROVIDED BY S.E. CIVIL.2. LOCATION OF STRUCTURES, HARDSCAPE, AND EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BEFIELD VERIFIED.3. VERIFY ALL LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS IN FIELD.4. PLANT COUNTS ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. FIELD VERIFY ACCORDINGLY.5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING POSITIVE DRAINAGE.6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS.7. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES INDRAWINGS OR FIELD CONDITIONS.8. REFER TO ARCH. / CIVIL FOR ALL DEMOLITION, TREE SAVE/REMOVAL, UTILITIES,GRADING, DRAINAGE, & HARDSCAPE.FAIRHOPE, AL PIER STREET MARKETPLACEJOSEPHHENRYCOMER IVNUMBER539REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARC HITECT S T A TE OF ALABAMASE A L N O T V A L I DUNLESS SIGNEDESPALIER, LLC.PLANL-1.2LANDSCAPEj_l7"'::-n-;://;:// l == // /;:// ll-lli==-111-' I /// / ''11',1,,',I,' '"'1/1'1 J..l rn = 1= ~···· · ==Ill 11111-111111--1 _// 111--IIIIII · I == -_-ill 11 ~ -_ __.,, -1-I -I ~~I J J Q--;:;;:;:-N.T.S. ----LA-01 Q--;:;;:;:-N.T.S. ----LA-04 Q--;:;;:;:-N.T.S. ----LA-02 Q---;.;;:-N.T.S. ----LA-03 0 NTS LA-16 0 0 0 □ ESPALIER landscape architecture Espalier, LLC F , P,O, Box 1247 e, abama 36533 a1rhop Al P: 251.454,3500 espalierdesign c • om 500. ISSUED/REVISED SPR 12/18/18 Revised 5 28 19 SHEET TITLE DESIGNED B'f JC FILE NAME CRAWN B'I' PIERSTMRK JC SHEET CHECKED Br JC l'ROJECT NO 1866 • 1),\1[ 12/17 /18 1 SD 19.29 Hill Top Subdivision ‐ July 1, 2019    Planning Commission     July 1, 2019    Subdivision Approval    Case:  SD 19. 29 Hill Top Subdivision    Project Name:    Hill Top Subdivision    Property Owner /Applicant:  Jason and America Tickle    General Location   West side of S. Section St between  Twin Beech Rd and Battles Rd     Project Type:   Major Subdivision    (Planning, Police and Permit   Jurisdictions)    Number of lots:   29     Project Acreage:   19.39 acres    Zoning District:   Unzoned, Baldwin County  District 14    PPIN Number:    19829    Engineer of record:   JADE Consulting, LLC    School District:    Fairhope Elementary,   Intermediate, and High schools     Report prepared by:   Nancy Milford, EIT #6537,  CAPZO Certified    Recommendation:  Approve with conditions               N R-A RUldenbll /AgnOJ.lture Odtna R.1 LowOe-.nslty S1r1gle-F1mt:, IJ 1 Rl (I ) LJ Rt(b) R-.S High Oendy OwelinO Re.sldentill R~ t.lobh Home P1it: OIIIU1Ci -B-t loooJShopplngOlsbla 8-2 G ene.ral 8 u.stness 0111tna 1111 8,.A 8uaane-91ndProte.ssional O!Mnd -IH l!gllllodosblll Ollttla -P-t Po<l,~g PUD Pllllnn~ Uni Oeve.llDpment 2 SD 19.29 Hill Top Subdivision ‐ July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:   Public hearing to consider the request of Two Hands Design and Development, LLC  for Preliminary Plat approval of Hill Top Subdivision, a 29‐lot subdivision.  The project is located on the  property is west side of S. Section Street between Twin Beech Road and Battles Road.  The associated  investor in this project is Jason Tickle.  The engineer of record is Mr. Trey Jinright, of JADE Consulting, LLC.    The total project acreage of Hill Top is approximately 19.39 acres with largest lot being approximately 35,716  sf and the smallest lot being approximately 15,000 sf in size.      Site Photos:                         View of the subject Property     View of Subject Property                              Road into subject property    3 SD 19.29 Hill Top Subdivision ‐ July 1, 2019  School Student Analysis:  The proposed subdivision contains 29 single family lots.  Applying the student yield factors (SYF) provided by  the Baldwin County Board of Education listed below, the development is expected to generate 11.31 (29 x  0.39) elementary school students, 3.19 (29 x 0.11) middle school students and 4.93 (29 x 0.17) high school  students.    Development  Name  Application  Type  Housing  Type  Total Units Attendance Zone SYF Expected  Number of  Students  Hill Top  Subdivision  Preliminary   Plat  SF  Fairhope  Elementary  0.39 11.31  “     “ “     “ “ “ Fairhope Middle 0.11 3.19  “     “ “     “ “ “ Fairhope High 0.17 4.93   Total Students 19.43    Comments:  All Associated Investors (Article IV SectionC.1.b.(3)):  Mr. Jason Tickle and Ms. Ameri’ca Tickle appear to be  the sole investors in this project.     Setbacks:   The property is unzoned.  The applicant has proposed setbacks of 30‐foot front, 30‐ foot rear, 10‐ foot side, and 20‐foot side street.   The applicant has verified that each lot has 100’ lot width at the front  setback line meeting the City of Fairhope’s lot width requirement in unzoned Baldwin County. The minimum  lot size in the development is 15,000 sf.      Errors and Omission Insurance (Article IV. A):  The proof of insurance has been provided and reviewed by  the City of Fairhope’s insurance representative (Robertson Insurance) and the Certificate was acceptable.     Adjacent property:    The applicant has shown the adjacent property and zoning of the contiguous  properties on the plat.      Greenspace (Article V.C. 3):   Staff discussed the recently passed greenspace requirements with the  applicant and that all greenspace shall be in compliance with the new City of Fairhope Subdivision  Regulations. According to the DRC video, the applicant indicated that greenspace for the overall  development is at 24%.    The applicant did not provide the actual greenspace calculations; however, the applicant did provide a  summary which is as follows: “Our project has 1.49 units per acre. As such 10% green space is required.  19.38‐acre project site will require a minimum 1.9 acres of open space.  Our project has 4.69 acres of  common area. All of the storm water facilities are designed with slopes that are flatter than a 3:1 and  integrated into open space.  Therefore, the requirement is met.  In an effort to provide additional  information, the stormwater infrastructure only occupies 1.17 acres.  As such the remaining 3.52 acres of  open space would greatly exceed the 1.9‐acre requirement.”       Storm water (Article V Section F):  According to the City of Fairhope’s Engineer, Richard Johnson, PE, the  storm water management system is designed for and constructed such to meet all the applicable storm  water management and post‐development treatment standards.  Staff checked with Mr. Richard Johnson  and Mr. Erik Cortinas regarding the individual drainage and buildability (with a 50‐ foot buffer) of Lot 29.   Both indicated that they are good with the drainage and buildability of lot 29.     4 SD 19.29 Hill Top Subdivision ‐ July 1, 2019  Operations and Maintenance Plan:  The applicant provided an Operations and Maintenance Plan and  Agreement.  The Operations and Maintenance plan and agreement shall be signed and sealed by the  engineer of record and shall be recorded at the time of final plat.  Staff did not receive any comments from  the Public Works Director, Mr. Richard Johnson regarding the LID/drainage easements.  The applicant added  the following note to the drawings as required: (4) The calculations, construction plans, and plat shall have  the following statement: “A property owners association (POA) is required to be formed. The POA is  required to maintain any and all storm water facilities and structures located outside of the publicly  accepted right‐of‐way.    Natural Resources:   Staff requested the applicant provide a narrative on the site natural resources.    The following is the applicant’s response: “The proposed project is located on a section of property that is  heavily wooded and in good condition.  Firm Map Number 01003 C 0757 L dated July 17, 2007, indicates the  property is located in Zone X.  This indicates the site to be outside of any 0.2% flood prone zone.  A map  showing the limits of the flood zone and nearby areas in relations to the site are enclosed with is this report.    The 19.39‐acre site drains in two primary directions. The north western corner of the site has 5.505 acres  with approximately 8’ of relief that drains onto the neighboring property and into the large drain.   The  balance of the site drains with approx. 32’ of relief the South and into a stream that is an upper tributary of  Point Clear Creek.  The project topographic drawings found in this report will further clarify the existing  conditions of the site.  The soils found on this site have a consistent drainage classification of C.  A copy of  the USDA NRCS soil map and soil classification is included in this report. This soil group is confirmed by the  enclosed Double‐Ring Infiltrometer Test Report.  The test results showed a percolation rate of 1” per hour  respectively for the double ring based upon depth and location of the test that was performed  An ephemeral stream was delineated on our site by EcoSolutions.  The limits of the stream are located on  the project’s development plans.   Buffers have been added to the top of the stream bank.  No  improvements are proposed within the delineated stream bank.    Wetlands (Article V Section F) and Erosion and Sediment Control:    Staff comments were as follows:  The applicant shall identify any natural features of the site, including, but  not limited to wetlands, tributaries, streams, and natural drainage features. All required buffers and signage  shall be required as per the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations (Article V Section F, Stream Buffers).   The applicant has shown a 50’ buffer for the stream and shown buffer signage location in the construction  plans.  The applicant’s representative worked with Mr. Buford King, Interim Director, regarding the 50’  buffer for streams.  Mr. Buford King worked with the applicant to allow LID structures to be placed within  the buffer.      Kim Burmeister Code Enforcement Officer Comments:  C8: drainage plan: “No red soil or clay is allowed in pond construction”  C18: Erosion Control Plan: Areas inactive for 10 days or more (not 13) require stabilization.  The applicant has placed a note on the plans addressing Kim Burmeister’s concern.   No site activity is allowed until a land disturbance or site work permit is issued  Flood Prone Areas (Article V, Section F.5.e‐f.):  Erik Cortinas provided an email, that there are no FEMA  flood zones or hydric soils for Hill Top Subdivision. The City of Fairhope Building Official, Mr. Erik Cortinas,  provided the following comments:  There is a blueline creek in the Southeast corner of the property shown  on the websoils map.  However, the Baldwin county aerial maps do not show a creek in the same location.   The applicant has provided an email verifying that they are doing no work in the stream and that they are  providing a buffer for the stream. The applicant originally provided a 30’ buffer, but if it is a stream and not a  5 SD 19.29 Hill Top Subdivision ‐ July 1, 2019  wetland, then a 50’ buffer from the top of bank should be provided. The applicant updated the plat to  reflect the 50 ‘buffer.   The applicant has shown the proposed buffer signage every 100’ (as per the above  regulation) on the construction drawings.    Finished Floor Elevations:  Erik Cortinas also said that specific finished floor elevations need to be on the  plat.  This requirement has been addressed by the applicant.      Tree Survey: The applicant has submitted a tree inventory as per Article IV section C 1.b.(13), Tree  protection plan shall be submitted for all required street trees or trees over 24” DBH  Tree protection  fences shall be installed prior to land disturbance activities (See Appendices G of the City of Fairhope  Subdivision Regulations).     Erecting Barriers is essential to protecting trees during construction.  The applicant shall provide  construction fences around all significant trees.  Allow one foot of space from the trunk for each inch of  trunk diameter.  The intent is not merely to protect the above ground portion of the trees, but also the  root systems. The fenced area shall be clear of building materials, waste, and excess soil.  No digging,  trenching or other soil disturbance shall be allowed in the fenced area.     Landscaping:  A tree preservation plan was provided.  The applicant has provided a landscape plan.  Staff  will have to verify if the following will apply at the time of preconstruction. Buford King is working on  determining the applicability of the Landscaping Ordinance. Fines for not complying with the City of  Fairhope’s ordinance 1193, tree protection, will be levied in accordance to the City of Fairhope’s restitution  table if it is determined the landscaping ordinance will apply.     Streets/ Traffic:  All lots front a publicly maintained right of way.  The applicant has not shown any  connection to adjacent neighborhoods.  One adjacent neighborhood, the TR District, is a private  development and according to their representative, Mr. Tim Lawley, they do not desire connection   with the Hill Top neighborhood.  There is a property to the north.  There was some discussion during the  Design Review with the applicant regarding connection to the site.      The applicant has not provided traffic verification that no traffic study is required.  A traffic count and  justification regarding the requirement for a traffic study has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Richard  Johnson, Public Works Director.   The applicant has provided verification that a traffic trips are below the  number that require a traffic study.     Flow Model:  A flow model has been submitted and approved by Mr. Richard Peterson, Director of  Operations.      Fire Hydrants: Fire hydrants shall be located at every intersection and every 450 feet. Mr. Peterson has  reviewed and approved the fire hydrant locations.    Water and Sewer: Water and sewer shall meet the City of Fairhope Water and Sewer Specifications.  There  were some water/sewer issues that were being worked out between the applicant’s engineer and the  Director of Operations. The Water and Sewer has not been approved at this time.  The applicant is working  with the Operations Director to look at the potential to upgrade service north of the property.       Lighting Plan/Street Lights:  Mike Allison, Electrical Superintendent, provided the following comments to  the Hill Top Subdivision Project: “I would like them to move the streetlights across the street at the three  intersections to the same side of the street as the stop signs.”    6 SD 19.29 Hill Top Subdivision ‐ July 1, 2019   According to Article V Section D 3 (f):   f.    Street lights are to be paid for or installed by the developer at the time of development. Street  lights shall be approved by the Planning director and/or his/her authorized agent and the Electrical  Superintendent. Pole height shall be no more than 15 feet from finished grade. The type and style of  lights and poles will be determined and agreed upon by the developer and the utility provider.  All  other approvals, including the design layout of street lights, will be granted by the electrical  superintendent.    The utility provider shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance of the street lights. Outside the  City of Fairhope, the homeowner’s association will be responsible for the maintenance, if applicable, and  energy costs of the lights and this responsibility shall be noted on the plat.       Waiver Requests:  An application is required for any waivers to the subdivision regulations as per Article VII  of the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations.  The applicant has not provided a written waiver request.   Mr. Buford King, Interim Director, worked with the applicant on the wetland buffer locations.  The City of  Fairhope Stream Buffer Regulations (Article V Section F.4) allow for some administrative approval with  regards to buffer encroachments.     Other:  Any applicable outside agency permits shall be obtained.        The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards.  “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning  ordinance, where applicable;  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks  Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;  or  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”  The proposed subdivision appears to be consistent with the minimum requirements for preliminary  Plat subdivision requirements.  Staff is unaware of any pending issues related to the applicable state or  federal locals and regulations and health and safety.  The burden of responsibility is on the applicant to  coordinate with appropriate agencies regarding their proposed project.     Recommendation:  Staff recommends approval of the application contingent upon the following conditions:    1.  The final Water and Sewer resolution shall be addressed to the satisfaction of Mr. Richard Peterson,  Operations Director, and be reflected on the “For Construction Plans”.    COMMONAREA #6xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx459.45'Cxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x x x x xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooox x x x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxS00°04'39"W 2,643.37' (A) S00°01'10"E 2,643.47' (R) S00°04'39"W 58.96' PP PP PP PP PP PP COMMONAREA#521201952896222324252627141287101113COMMONAREA #41516 1718COMMON AREA #14321COMMON AREA #2295 0 ' B U F F E R 50' B U F F E R50' BUFFER50' B U F F E R PETIOLE DRIVE50' R.O.W.PETIOLE DRIVER . O .W . V A R I E S 251.928.3443(tel) 251.928.3665(fax) jadengineers.comJinright & Associates Development Engineers208 Greeno Road North Fairhope, Alabama 36532P.O. Box 1929 Fairhope, Alabama 36533( IN FEET )01 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE606060GREEN SPACE EXHIBITAPPROX. 19.39 ACRESPROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT S. SECTION STREETFAIRHOPE, ALHILL TOPGREEN SPACE AREA WITHGREEN SPACE AREA LEGEND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE(1.17 ACRES)(3.52 ACRES)TOTAL GREEN SPACE: 4.69 ACRES (24.2%)CRS CTF WEST 667' ± (R) S89"53'32"W 660. 73' (A) ··-··-· -··-··-·· •••••:.• -':.,•.•; .,·•• r\,,-'••••:•:•·• •;~'•'.Cj•'•"••••••••·•• •.•. -: ......... <-,,.•••. '••••~c.,~,•.,•,•,,: , ••. ;, ... • ... ,,,,•-;~-.•C• ~ C ----ADE CONSULTING, LLC .. w ~ Cl \.CRF(1) -C)-CRF(1) RRSF 1 SD 19.30 Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne – July 1, 2019    Planning Commission     July 1, 2019    Subdivision Approval    Case: SD 19.30 Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne    Project Name:  Phase 6 of Golden Oaks at Firethorne    Property Owner /Applicant:  Nathan Cox, Ralph Reynolds,   Davis Pilot, Billy Stimpson,   Sands Stimpson, and Thomas Gross    General Location:   East side of St. Hwy. 181 just south of   Quail Creek Subdivision    Project Type:   Major Final Plat     Number of lots:    26    Project Acreage:    12.68 acres    Zoning District:   PUD (Planned Unit Development)    PPIN Number:   202889    Engineer of record:   Dewberry Engineers, Inc.    School District:   Fairhope Elementary, Middle and   High schools    Report prepared by:   Nancy Milford, EIT #6537, CAPZO   Certified    Recommendation:    Approve with conditions                      N R .. A. Re:sldenbl.J /AgriaJllure 011:S1r:1a R .. 2 Me<11Um Oen.•ty S~~~amll)' R-3 High Density S.nglie..Femly R-3 POH Pa liolGar~n S11,gje faml)I [=1 R-31ll To....,,houwSr!9lefl!lml~ 1111111 R..t1 LowOend~ Muti,l•mlty R-S High Oensly D'M'll\g Rnldenba.l B-2 G e ner■l 8 usnesa D•lnd 1111 8,.la Tounll Flnort L00911g Oisllla .. 6,.3.b Tou.n• Fle-sort Comme,aal Servlc.e Oistnd ~ 6--t ButLnus 100 Prol!!':nona/Olstnct 2 SD 19.30 Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne – July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:  Public hearing to consider the request of Firethorne Development for Final Plat  approval of Phase 6 of Golden Oaks at Firethorne, a 26‐lot subdivision.  The project is located on the  property is located on the east side of St. Hwy. 181 just south of Quail Creek Subdivision.  The associated  investor in this project is Mr. Nathan Cox Ralph Reynolds, Davis Pilot, Billy Stimpson, Sands Stimpson,  Thomas Gross.  The engineer of record is Mr. Justin Britt, of Dewberry.   The total project acreage of Phase 6  of Golden Oak at Firethorne is approximately 12.68 acres with largest lot being approximately 31,950 sf and  the smallest lot being approximately 15,000 sf in size.      Site Photos:   Overall Site looking to the Northwest       Site History:  The existing PUD Development, known as Firethorne was originally proposed with 228  lots.  The Firethorne PUD is a 126.37 acre residential development located on the east side of Alabama  Highway 181, south of Quail Creek Drive and north of North Village of Stone Creek PUD.  The proposed  subdivision was a phase that was in the original master plan.  The existing Firethorne PUD has had a  reduction in the total number of lots and currently stands at 225 lots.  Attached is a layout of the  overall development including all phases:                3 SD 19.30 Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne – July 1, 2019  Subdivision History:   Case  Number Applicant Case Type Subdivision Name No.of  Lots Location Zoning PZ Date PZ  Decision SD‐14‐09  Preble‐Rish, LLC Preliminary Firethorne ‐Phase 1A &  1B  79 Inside PUD 8/4/2014 Approved SD‐15‐21  Preble‐Rish, LLC /  Firethorne Dev.  Final Firethorne ‐Phase 1A &  1B  79 Inside PUD 9/8/2015 Approved SD‐09‐15  Volkert &  Associates  Minor Phase 2 Fairhope Village 2 Inside PUD 12/7/2009 SD‐09‐13  Volkert &  Associates  Minor Phase 2 of Fairhope  Village  2 Inside PUD 9/8/2009 Approved SD‐16‐17  Dewberry / Preble‐ Rish, LLC  Preliminary Phase 2 of Silverleaf at  Firethorne  29 Inside PUD 8/1/2016 Approved SD‐17‐10  Dewberry/Preble‐ Rish  Final Phase 2 of Silverleaf at  Firethorne  29 Inside PUD 4/3/2017 Approved SD‐16‐26  Dewberry/Preble‐ Rish, LLC  Preliminary Phase 3 of Greenbriar at  Firethorne  30 Inside PUD 11/10/201 6 Approved SD‐17‐23  Dewberry/Preble‐ Rish, LLC  Final Phase 3 of Greenbrier at  Firethorne  29 Inside PUD 9/5/2017 Approved SD‐16‐35  Dewberry/Preble‐ Rish, LLC  Preliminary Phase 4 of Golden Oak at  Firethorne  31 Inside PUD 12/5/2016 Approved SD‐18‐22  Dewberry  Engineers, Inc.  Final Phase 4 of Golden Oak at  Firethorne  31 Inside PUD 6/4/2018 Approved SD‐18‐15  Dewberry/Preble‐ Rish, LLC  Preliminary Phase 5 of Greenbriar at  Firethorne  30 Inside PUD 5/7/2018 Approved SD‐18‐16  Dewberry/Preble‐ Rish, LLC  Preliminary Phase 6 of Golden Oak at  Firethorne  26 Inside PUD 5/7/2018 Approved SD‐19‐30  Dewberry Final Phase 6 of Golden Oak at  Firethorne  26 Inside PUD 7/1/2019   Zoning History:      Case  Number PC Date PC Result CC Date Dev. Name Owner Request Legal Ordinance  Number ZC 14.05 5/5/2014 Appr. 6/23/14 Firethorne Firethorne  Development, LLC Conditional  Annexation to  PUD 05‐46‐06‐23‐ 0‐000‐022.001 ZC 18.03 3/5/2018 Appr. 8/13/18 The Village at  Firethorne PUD Firethorne  Development, LLC PUD  Amendment PPIN: 366931 Approved ‐ Ord. 1623   Comments:  Associated Investors:  Ralph Reynolds, Davis Pilot, Billy Stimpson, Sands Stimpson, Thomas   Gross and Nathan Cox.     Errors and Omission Insurance (Article IV, Section A):  The applicant has submitted the Errors and Omission  Insurance.     Lots:  Setbacks appear to be per the Preliminary Plat.   4 SD 19.30 Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne – July 1, 2019  Greenspace (Article V.C.3):  The masterplan for this development was approved prior to the recent changes  in the subdivision regulations regarding greenspace.   This particular phase does not have greenspace.  The  overall development has a proposed greenspace of 12%.     Finished Floor Elevations: The applicant has added specific finished floor elevations on the plat per the  Building Official, Erik Cortinas’s, instructions.  The Building Department processes have changed and actual  finished floor elevations need to be on all plats.       Fire Hydrants (Article VI Section G):   Fire hydrants are required at every intersection and every 450 feet.   The Water Department has provided their final inspection comments.  Staff received no comments from the  Water Department regarding this item.     Storm Sewer (Article VI Section E.1‐2):   The applicant has submitted a storm water video for review.  The  video has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director, Mr. Richard Johnson.  He had one issue  regarding an invert, which he told staff on June 6, 2019 has been satisfied.     Drainage (Article V Section F):  A final inspection was conducted on May 22, 2019.  The primary comment  regarding the drainage was that the applicant will need to sod the grass swales.     Operation and Maintenance Plan:  This phase of development does not have a detention pond, therefore  no Operation and Maintenance was provided.     Streets (Article V Section D.6):  Streets in this subdivision are public.  Road tests have been provided and  approved.     Sidewalks: Sidewalks in front of lots are being addressed with a performance guarantee.  The applicant has  submitted the subdivision performance agreement, the cost estimate, and the actual bond. Sidewalks are  not provided in front of common area because there is no common area in this phase of the overall  development.     Street Trees (Article V Section D1.B (4) and Landscaping:  Any street trees shall meet the requirements of  the approved landscape plan.  The street trees will be verified by the City prior to the   release of the performance bond.   There is no landscaping in this phase because there is no common area.      Water and Sewer Department Final Inspection (Article Iv, Section D.4):  The City of Fairhope Water and  Sewer Department inspected the site.  There comments were as follows: “No issues. The applicant agreed to  put in a 6‐ inch water main stub‐out stopping at the dirt mound south of Quail Creek Dr.”    Lighting Plan: The applicant has submitted a street light invoice.  The plans were reviewed and approved by  Mr. Richard Peterson, Director of Operations.      Building Official comments:  Building Official comments are as follows: There are no FEMA flood zones or  known unusual drainage issues for Firethorne Phase 6.    Maintenance Bond:  The applicant has submitted the required maintenance bond package including the  maintenance agreement, the maintenance bond and the engineer’s cost estimate.      5 SD 19.30 Phase 6 of Golden Oak at Firethorne – July 1, 2019  Subdivision Bond:   The subdivision bond package has been submitted and includes the subdivision bond,  the subdivision bond agreement and the engineer’s cost estimate.     Recorded Plats (Article IV Section D.7):  All conditions of approval shall be satisfied in a timely manner.    At the time of final plat, the applicant shall have all items completed so the Plat may be recorded within a  60‐day time frame, per the City of Fairhope Regulations.      Other:  Any applicable outside agency permit shall be obtained.     Waiver Request:   An application is required for any waivers to the subdivision regulations as per Article VII  of the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations.  The applicant has not provided any written waiver request;  therefor, staff is assuming no waivers are being requested.     The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards.  “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws ‐ The Planning Commission shall not approve the  subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and  development as proposed, due to any of the following:  a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning  ordinance, where applicable;  b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or  program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks  Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program;  c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations;  d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations;  or  e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the  planning jurisdiction of the City.”      This application appears to be consistent with the City of Fairhope’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning  Ordinance as the Master Plan was approved by the City Council on June 23, 2014.    Recommendation:    Staff recommends approval of the application contingent upon the following  conditions:   1) As a condition of approval, there is to be a six‐inch water line tapped and stubbed out on the  north end of this project.  All agreed that it would be capped short of the berm at Quail Creek  Drive, prior to signing plat.  2) Two concrete monuments will be placed prior to recording the plat.   3) Final punch list being satisfied, prior to plats being signed.      PAMPAS LANENANDINA LOOP 50 FT. R/W NANDINA LOOP 50 FT. R/W 3233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657COMMON AREABAAMALA N TG.AVE JOHN251.990.9950 fax 251.929-981525353 Friendship Road Daphne, AL 36526W:\NATHAN\50098834-FIRETHORNE PH 5 & 6\PHASE 6\PLN\FINAL\FIRETHORNE-PH6 FINAL.dwg, 5/21/2019 11:56:48 AMPOINT OF BEGINNING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF QUAIL RUN SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 1775-A) I I I LOT-10 I I --1 I :t: ' . 62.98' I ,--------,._ I I I I I I I I I 204. 74 ·-.},, \ i9~-.. '·,,.._:) ',_ ' '< \ J LOT-11 I ~ \ \ • • ---...... ---...... LOT-13 \ \ "' <D ·r-. I I I I I I I ' 31950 SF 0.73 AC N ---'-------'---I"> LOT-7 LOT-8 7 _)-, ,-:€==--:F) IC) -1--(,/) 7 ,-.... ~,--::, (J ,_✓ N LOT-9 t'Ji<Ot\'I,', c.'Ci--i,\' 1-{c__,,.'iY ,'If ? 0 ,'!']){ 717.'i SP/,,\','Sh' .'DP.I .-1~ 35t;77 LOT-10 1,'~~-',1.~.',', /,1,;-;;i_ W &-41_1,,,o·r ,1,\'N 19700 :OT ;,1v.:y ;s;· ,-A.',?! .'C.C'[ A~ 35.532 <D "' CD ;s:: ' N ·"' 0 NO N • •O Do 0-(/) 0 0 ci 0 ,---' I I I ' I 19263 SF 0.44 AC 170.01' ------17001 SF 0.39 AC I L_ --N89"S7'32"W 170.01 -------17001 SF 0.39 AC L _ J3o'_!!RAINAGE EASD,tENc N89"37' 32"W r. T ____ 17o.or __ I I 0 0 ci h-1 o:e -'-'· ~I V) . '51 "". ~I <>: • Cf o· . 0~ ci 0 I I I ,---' I I I I I I L __ I !--1 I_ 17001 SF 0.39 AC 170.01' 17001 SF 0.39 AC 6 GER T!FICA TION OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICA TION: -'.:O S 1,:__; Clk I1-v -,\I /\'.:.. 7 I I I I I I I I I I I . ,-1 I I I I I I I I I __________ c-______________ Tl Ii C',\i'~-R OF -HE _f'JC· s+::}1,•\'N J,.\J:) DEsc::;;IB::::::: Ii~ THE r _AT, -L.'.,5 ::=AUSED TI--E S.A.ME TO D=--S~-<'-i=--Y=--Ll ,\[\_:, S~:::3Ll VUlll :\'_:; 1\__;,Ic/, Ill) -=--KlC\J, 1-u-: H=--l~'.:Ol'.:C ,\\I_; F\, -;pc;;=;r-;=; I IIT'.-ll'J SI--01:nI I .AI\J--::, 1;c,1s IIRlrW .4C><l'JC)\'/ 1--::cT AT; ADCFT --::: S.l,\1E UNC:::R -HE c,:::s cr,J AND TI-L::: HER::::JI\ r,JDIC.A.TE:), ,i:.JJ[I CR:'\'H ALL U•,'.:,;U,/l\.lS 1-'._H 7=--P~ll-lf--'C,'.:_;l::.; ~,UI=--__; Hu-.;u_:,\ /\[\JU Jll)'..:,/\I=--I\ __ '.:Cll-il=--IS 10 F\. -!I IC: ,,1:=;-, _A_l\lll A ;-;::l\-H-.-101\J ;',,~I.AS .Ahli) IA.:T\111\J-:, TC P~l\iA.r l.,'.0-, -:=:cE-1--:::::;; 'NITH 5UC-REs-::;:ICTIDl'JS AND cc:rvnJ.AJJ-5 \:JTED =:ELO'W o::;; I/\C-=--_; I1,J ,\ S=--_;/\R,\ ll LlG:\ __ ;c,,:_:u\1=--1\I DJ.,TED THIS ___ [1,AV OF _________ _ CERT/FICA TION BY NOTARY PUBLIC: STA ff c:,-CO~ \ p-OF 2C _______ , \JC:TAR'-' F·., ~I IC N ,C,J,JIJ l\:.R Tl Ii CO~\TV OF 3/\LD',V~,, \ THE s-1\TE c=-/\L,'\81\\I/\ ---jE~EBV c:::RT=-v --,\T C:T --------IS SICl'ff--::, TC Tl Ii -::-:,rTCC) r,JC l\:OTRUlvTI\ T. A.'~I; W-C IS -<NO\'i\J TO V:::, /\C-<NC\V_E:::GEC BE=-C)RE 'vlE CN -I--IS D1\v --/\T, BEI\G l'JHJl-i\/=--_: u-I7l :_:cN =-\JI::_:--l lf\r,:;I1--LVIUJ, ,t>J,Jl) A':, '::,JC7 UI--IC=---( ,.S.JJLJ W Tl I -1_, /1,_, Tl ICR TY, -:c'."":I.r1--:: T -':',A\;li VOi lHrt-.<II Y -cm A.'~I; AS T Ii .ACT CF SAC C8Rr:JRAT8\J c;I\:'=--\ l,'JUlk lv1Y H.,\~~u _1\f\_) f\lCIURl,\L '.::l/1L Hl~i U:\Y CT _________ ?C: ;:'; 0 N N "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 0 0 23442 SF 0.54 AC t I I I I I I I I rol <D ., iJ .w, El c:,I ~1 I I I I I I I / I 0 0 ci 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0 WA' s,:, .4,\',\',r r: )7(J Tlp):",h; ,' .l,.','F" S IA/..!i:!iLC AL J0'~L,!:J QUAIL CREEK DR. Cl.' Y 0,' ,' _AJ'<!--iOi-'C !'.0. C:/f/1l•h:,'.' 129 ,-;,1.0,1_,CPC, /,~ :653: N89"45'03"W 735. 79' 0.51 AC S89"45'03"E C 109.23' 15295 SF 0.35 AC 82.55' 120.86 15963 SF 0.37 AC 67.45' -_, ca S89"45'03"E 150.00' -----------+--I I I I I I I I I I 75.16' ---7 I I I I I I ' 15299 SF 0.35 AC 150.00' 15000 SF 0.34 AC --, I I I I I I I h. I CJ '--S89"45'03"E--" 150.00 ------15000 SF 0.34 AC 589'45'0.f'E ---_J I o. 01 o. S'i 74.84' ,-1 I I I I I 15287 SF 0.35 AC I I I I I L_1-.rs9"4s•o-3~w-' 150.00' ------------15000 SF 0.34 AC N89"45'03"W 150.00 ' I I ' I I I I I a ,-------------1 I ' 15000 SF 0.34 AC . _ ]l,0.J)O'.._ ·-,-·7 I , . _, _. _J!;i0.00'. 15000 SF 0.34 AC 150.00' I I I I I I -, I I h. cS Of o_ gr I ts 1· I I I I "-C • 0 I I ~ I Of : 15000 SF : a:: . 0· 1 0.34 AC 1 '." [ ;?I I I 15000 SF 0.34 AC I I I I I I I I I I I I L_ N89"45'03~W --150.00· ------------15000 SF 0.34 AC ,-------..,. OCJ st "' 0 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci 0 26466 SF 0. 61 AC \ \ 0 <D ci I'-0 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0 0 0 ci 0 226. 73 29267 SF 0.67 AC 17650 SF 0.41 AC 16379 SF 0.38 AC I I I I I I -' I I I I I I ssg·37'S2t:---" 163.56' ------16334 SF 0.37 AC 16290 SF 0.37 AC ' I ----589"3 7' .32'1 __ -" 162.68' ,---------' I 0 0 0 O'l N st N N <D I'-"' OCJ 0 0 ci 0 1/2"RBF 0 0 ci CD LOT-2 LOT-4 LOT-6 L A,~·AM.O, ~'AR:' F";JR.'.' C:-·· 12CJ GAF..!!.40UIH D,P, (__'. _ LJ !):_;fi-,',A.'/ g Jt}~'J -Q _J -I -- --~-' w~~ LOT-8 ,-,·~;, .'H, v:,~ui,N H ,;.« !C6' !_X1.ii:3 !J.'< ,r/ .. 1,?J 1QF~ /1i_ J55J2 LOT-10 i,~3 C~Ui:3 i.A ,r/..'.'I.' 1OF'L /IL 355J3 LOT-12 8ARR, ,~A \//1;1< 11i) Cl '!8 oS'R FA.'.RHOF'E A~ J(C:5J2 LOT-14 =-; J:: ;;;, ,>1!n :J.'i .'Ali,i--;'UJ--'!:. AL ;JJ?::l LOT-16 c_;wt!:_<',', IJ-1~•.✓.AS [.) 1:. .',~L ~,P,EE\'. i<fcl/1,', I /id C!I!/) ,'),'( LOT-18 SMiii--/. KA Th'i F,""N AC, ,1,'-/U~·1t_i:_S rOi-/ K/, !.' ici...~i•i ,f St!,' t;,?) .. '/,~.0? 1,>J A6S."V! 1/2"CRF (~OORE) LOT-20 ,:;,'?U,\)i?Y ! ':1~'L ,_1,').A/ilT ii3 CU.'i3 D,'i LOT-22 MCCC.'i!.4!i}{, i--i.ARF:'f: 1-1.~1 i,1i:(:i!h','A1(;_<_ .V..',~1 K ~l..'R,'-IC,~: A1 )6.'i)? LOT-24 i;~ ,' ,11U:.•,;', Ch'AH~CS C t i/1L !)~ 1 WiL~!<', !3/,,',bi, 722 CLU:J 01< ,r;,;m,o,o,r -~' .)6.'5,)/ (f) LOT-26 <: Lil UJ :J.'F!SON, J .1:•!.')J.. C ;;,4-{,',' 1;;-; }!,';' r-,A,','-//-!'.)1't AL J6'!;,J2 LOT-28 i?OUS5,-,,, ,"!:")_/j,r/;>T ,--,;,; ,YOt!SSfcL, Zti'.'/, A\'!", I I C. : "' I I o I 0 I I I I 0 0 0 0 .,.,...f,---L--_-_--..:.1 ... 50"' • .:ao='o:::· ~:-:-:-=-i-'h1 __ L_-_-..... 1 ..;5o:.;.,.:.o,.:.o_· ----►-L---4g S89'45'03"E I 350.00' I ' 16246 SF 0.37 AC LOT-30 7 ~-r1AS[ /1-, I 22 ...___ ------------__..,,. MORTGAGEE'S ACCEPTANCE: --------'.-::,1 -l UWN=--~S JI-Hl MU~IGAGl ~I\ IHl t..rACHE=:, JESC~IB:=::=: PROP:'::~T"" HAS CA~'":;:'::::: -7 S f\STRIJV:'::\J-E1 8:':: -:c::-:l_lrr:; lY Tl Ii ,_I\ --::,1RSIC'SI; c:,111::-:-w; Tl IIRP, ·re --::uI Y P .. , T IC•!\ r--:: UJ IH '.::, -l U.1\Y JI-_______ j_" :::!Y _______ _ CERT/FICA TION BY NOTARY PUBLIC: c; '\ ll :_11-:;c:,1,,r,J-·-' CT __ _ hi T -:OT.A.--(T , Vv'HCSE \11'.lv'E ,'\S ________ :J=-::: ::::::_:~Jlll IU I-l l-:J-S:lI:.:;::_:\:,; Ii~'.:: -S:Uk1l'JI, /,,\_', 'NI O IS K'J'.JV'.'I\ T'.l \:Ii, A::-:KI\C\,\i 11c---:: n--rn,-f .. ff C;'J Tl IIS 1,1,t,,Y Tl IA-, n-\C: \FOR\.'ED J=---E C81\TENT CF TI--E Ir,Js-=wr-.. 1E\J-. 1\\::: 1\S sIJ::H c=-FCER 1\\J::: 'Nll7 -LILL 1\I_J -(>:Iv, lX=--CU lll I7l S/\Ml 'v'C_Uf\Jl1\klLY 1-:J-S: i\f\.Jll 1\':, IHl ,\Cl '.""W SA.ll,1 C:DRFCmA-O~J '_:l\/lf\l Uf\-lll=--k f,,1v 7i\'~J /'.JJU \UIUh' /\_ '.:C=--1\L IHI'.:: ;/,,y :w _________ , :;::: I f-31 --, I f-l -{.. LOT-32 i A1/:~_1il ii.', ~•AiiY"; iY:>4 PA.'"11:r,? P.' i-ii,:'c,'1IW'.)C'i) ,'I,; .5/U// LOT-34 <C L1 f--I . ~'~ -<.~ I LI -I , H V '::(: ,j, CT) ---......,,. <~, I LI ---,--"/ --'--.-, :_) I I 'l ( ....J I" ~ -~i s Cr! '1_I CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE:{GAS) THF "I\ lFR::: C~,FD, AS AU----j::-;:;:I7Fr) RY -HF CIT✓ :JF FA :::rnor=--FR=-=:y A.l'l'-(C\il'.:_; 7=--\1\il -f\, l'U'-. I 1--c-: IHl -;u_:o-rnI1\::.; UI-S.t..Vl 11,1 H=--l'-WclA ll OIIIC= '.J-0/\_[;·wl\ ::OUhJ-Y, :\L,'\0/\t-i /\, -IS [),'\v o-CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY BALDWIN EMC:{ELECTRIC) 7=--ur,JLll--<:.ilChl_\ /\:i ,,\L I1---CJRILlU :P cl/\ _ _:vvl\J lVC Hblclv :\l''l'WJ\/l:::.i Hl \'/THI!~ =·_A,T FOR THE R:'::COR=:•l~,IC ::J=-''::At-,E \ T7:':: =,R8:'A.TE :JFFICE c=-Bf',_D\-\1I1\J '"',\TY, A ,:i,nAJ.,1.A., T IIS r:i_n.·v-~I-_________ _ Al_. Tl--ORI ZED ~EP ~ESEr,J-P,TI\/E CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY TELEPHONE {AT&T): 7=--U~JLll-iSIC;l'-l_\ A'.::; .Al_ ll--1:..:1RILU.:1 :::3v ,A &I 1---lf-.'.=--t:'Y AJJ-'---.:UVlS IHl 1/1/I 7 \ =, .t..T 1:-Jr:-< --R-:--::m~r:, '~C: c-SAMI '~ Tl Ii PRCT!Aff CT '.T c-l.AI llW r,J :__;::__;_\I Y. :\_,\tJi\M.,'\. I 7IS __;;\Y UI-CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE:{WATER) TI--E U'~C:'::RSIC'EC, AS f',w THOR ZEC BY Tl--:':: C TY OF =-.AIR-(PE HE~EBv A=>PR'.l .... THF VJ THI\J Pl P,--,~,p TI--F RF"Y1R-l~~G 1=-,:c:,,..,i1F , TI--F ~R'.lF.A.-=-CT C[ 01 OALD1Nlt,J C:J.~ '\Jr✓• ,t.._AJA\,1.A. Tl IIS CAY 0-RECORDING STAMP GENERAL NOTES: FO~ TI--E LOC/\Tlrn,J o=-,I\L_ ._ITI_ITIES, SEE c:mJSTRl ... '.__~T C:\J l'U\JJS 7. s-:i:;:k-1\'it..TFR nF-=-rrn\ P,RF.4S ,.:,.=;:F r,JCH THF p=-s~UJSIRI ITY OF ::-rv c=-I All~I '.)1-'I 10 h/A I\ I.Alr,J 3. 1\_L IFL TIES ',\/LL 3E C:~l\STRUC:E] Ul\o::::;:c;pm,\JC. 4. -H=-RF S }Fr)C:,i,_-=--; HFRFVv'IT-.A. 1D F'.;OT ,_ITll-v FASF\1=-r, .. -;--;\ A CT I\ S A.\J: C0\,11\~C!I\ P,l~I AS .Al)JA.'.:1 N l:l 1111 l~IC:II -0 -','1/f:..Y'O 5. -H:::RE S =:ED::/',-:::=: HEREVv'IT-;\ 15 F'.JOT .nu-v /,ID DRi\l~,.1\G::: l:\'.::d-iH:J,J /\LOI\::; IH:. R:_l,.---i LU L \J=--S 0-/,LL LU S UI\Ll:.SS S+:J\,Vl,J c,IHt.---(\1\'ISt.: 1'\t,JU /J., 1:::i 1-:JGI U IL IY ANU 8RAI\JP./::r_ =--·t.,SU/U,I A_8\8 .A.LL SJl L:n ur,J[S (7 5 i==T 8T =A.::::I I SID=\ ti. W) -lNC=--S 1\\_; [\JI_:, '.:_; k1J1:..: II_IR~::.: '.:.H,\LL ell 'U\C=--_'. lf\J u-.:_i\lN/\Gl 1\NU '.__H l, TII ITY =-P.s=-t,.:IFl'-J-:=:;. 7. Iv' ~,lfv·ILJlv' =-I~~ISHE=1 FLOCR :'::_:'::\iP,TIOI\J SHALL B:':: 1t3" AEO\':':: T7E -I'.~HES-CRC_, \} II I\/,",-J\ 10 11-T CUTS ;1 ;JI nJ r:: ~JC. s---11-IAIRI :JFI ~UII n I\C lJll':\--<; ·vllN -Ok '~l'lC -IC -::lc,IJlk=--f'ilU,J I ~-/\ l'KCl'I---'( Y :J1,\NI-R'.:.J 1\~;SUC:1\IIU,J (11:)1\) 7i\'.-; 1-31-1-1\ -OR'vll-I) -OR IHI-FIFi:'::TH:JR\E DEVE_CPf·✓IDH Ai'JD A CEC_,n.=<_A,T C\ TC .tc.lv':'::\JC -HE EXIST W] CC\'[~JA~HS A\=; IC'~;TRICTC\J:; ',\.'LL ='.[ ICCCfC[D \J -1= nc:c]./'.\T :Tl '.T TO l~,CI UIJ-IHI~; l'-_1\'.-J-. --l'C/-, "-<I-UUIR-I~ U M/',_I\ I/\lf,J /',hlv /,Nl:1 1\I '.-:ICJR\I ··/{A.-:=::~ F.A,CILI-ES N,C s.-=:::IJCTUF.'.ES _OC.A,TED C1LJ-Sl]E OF THE =J3LIC_v A.::c==,-=D I? Cl IT -Cl -1,'/,t._'(S. '::I. H-RI-'.-:H1\I I H-)'.) -C·O h--l'"-<1-S-RV/,_ ;J\ H_,1-1-1----; 1\I Df'K IHI-K·-.\R o=-LOTS 23 31 .AS S7J'N\ HER:':::J\ FEhlC:'::S SH:',LL BE P.L_CVv:=:::::: 'NITHII'-THE nc= Pl'TS=TvATC\ [3I__Jr-Tr? Oi'J u:rs 23-Y ~Ir CO~JSH""<.,2T:JI\ S P,L_ \:JT I).Al\1/<;-I+ h-1-'.-J. CURVE RADIUS ARC CHORD BEARING Cl 100.00' 156.86' N45'18'43"E C2 100.00' 157.30' S44"41 '17"E C3 75.00' 117.65' N45"18'43"E C4 125.00' 31.06' N07"29'34"E C5 125.00' 77.57' N32'23'22"E C6 125.00' 75.35' N67"26'17"E Cl 125.00' 12.09' N87"28'43"E CB 125.oo· 23.98' S84" 15'20"E C9 125.oo· 75.35' S61"29'25"E CID 125.00' 75.35' S26'57'01 "E Cl 1 125.00' 21.94' s04·39'1o"E C12 75.00' 117.97' S44"41 '17"E SIT[ DATA CUl~RlN I LONI NG: PUlJ L f-.I. FT. STREETS: 1,343 LF !,UMBER OF LOTS: 26 SMALLEST LOT: 15,000 SF LARGEST LOT: 31,950 SF COMMO~J AREAS: o.s· AC. TOT /1L ARE/,: 1 2. 68 AC. DENSITY: 2.05 LOTS/ACRE ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE: PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE -40% ACCESSORY STRUCTURE -25% (OF REQUIRED "EAR YARD) f!IAXllvlUtvl BUILDING HEIGHT -35' R[QUIR[::; S[TIJACKS: FRONT: 35 F:::ET RCAR: 35 rcc-SllJl: 1 0 1-lll STREET SIDE: 20 ~EET (UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN) UTILITY PROVIDERS WATER: CITY OF FAIRHOPE SEWER: CITY OF FAIRHOPE GAS: CITY 01° FAIRHOPE ELEC-RIC: BALOW N EMC TELEPHONE: AT&T CHORD 141.27' 141.58' 1 D5.95' 30.98' 76.34' 74.22' 12.08' 23.94' 74.22' 74.22' 21.91' 106.18' CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE FAIRHOPE PLANNING COMMISSION TIIS P ;.,T II.'"-S nl-\ c:;I_,lfs!ITT--::, T1 A,\r) ::CJ\S-llR-r: nY TIii ;-;-·-✓ P Id\'~\::: CCf,fv'l'.::/::'.IC\J C)-I-,\IRI--C ir_, 1\_/,,::;i'.J.l1\ ,\\JL:; IS /IV ;RC\/t.J r:3v '.:;IJC---j ::.::m-,H✓I SSl'..::\J. liY ___________ l),\lt. -----------CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE:{SEWER) I--=-I_.NlJ=--RS CNlU, A:i A.J -C)R LlU ::3Y -=--Cl IY CJ-1---",IRHC 'l HlR=--cJY /',P=>RC\IES T-:=:: '-/YI-Hlt,.J PL.-\T F'.)~ --:=:: RECO';D N:; 1._,=-S.'\fv·IE \j THE PROB,\TE CI-ICI 01 l.A.I r)'N I\ ::::CU'HY, Al .c'-.IJA'vll'l,, T IS 1,1'.Y 01 /\UT -ORI ZED ';EP~ESE~~ -1\ Tl \/E ENGINEER'S CERT/FICA TE .... A'.::C~, \J, LSIL'.::, ?, LICLl'ELU l'IW L~'.:.il0f\1AL Lf\JC~,--I~ \ IIIL '.:: .A.IL :J ,\L,\E:\Hi\ L :=EI\JSE \C. 227' /' -EF!E='Y :::ERTi FY TH/',-H1\\/E o:::sI::;~JED THE 1-/1111'.0\rVlii'J-S -OR Tl IIS r:i-VI C'·tv111'H Ir,J CJI\ -CRVII-Y ',\1n I A'l'I ICA:I1 C:JilS M,J LAW':;. M~U '/,'I II I -l'l<l\'.JI' __ ':; JI c::.:::J..:: u,.JCI\LLl~\j::_; l'~-"'.C ICL 1~2LUD \j~; --::: CR/\lr\,\GE ]ESIGl,J ::;;EouI:::;:::\ilDr~; :J=---E Fr RHOP::: :~,_,3DIVISlm~ IIGI,, ATICH~S. llH"dlll< :::nnI-y TIIA-I IIA\11 r1ovn---:: C'v'IRSIC T (;I -II-::.:0f\j'.:_; l~L.C C)N C \IIY JLSIC\I. M~U IIIAI C IIIL lJLSI Cl fv'IY KI\C'/'.'LLLlC_ .A.I\JlJ ?ELIEF, ----j::: 1\S-BL,ILTS p::;;C,\/ DE=: TC THE C: TY CF F/'.IRI--DPE ,-\=iE TRUE .,\\: P,CCl,l,L.r 111'11'.Tr,rATICI'~ c::--1 -Ir-~r\O\/-r-,'III\JTS AS '~ST.Al I ID A'~-:: -1 AT ::;.;_;, It-/ 'l~CVUL~,IS ,l'-,IL IU<LJY ~LC:JMHL'U_l) cm ,t.,CC_ "I.41\CL uv II LC IY JF F.\ F;---jCJPE, /,_/\=':.\''ii/\ J:\'.:;o\ r\ ESTE'.:;, El~c; I\EER [)/\TE --::F'NRFRRY ·11.1',SL C 01 C:Oll)_ 'J ::_::;.,,< A 11 ?_ I C \I\JL. -~S-lJ~I-l'_M,'.:.i, '/-/1 IIC I -~ ~L CEF,'TIF EJ, ccw;I~:;-::;=-pt,,:;Es THR,_, , Ei\C---j o=-w-I::H =':E:\F,S l·.,l'V SE/\_ P,I\ l SICl'-,A TlJRF. LEGEND: SURVEYOR'S NOTES: l'---;Ul'=--klv IS LUC:\llU r,1 S=--,:..:II:J~, Lj, I:J'N~,S-II' b SCJJ -R:\\J::;E 2 E/,S-, B1\LD1/./lf,J CJI~ \J-v. 1\_/,,=:,.\tv'l1\. ' . FAIRHOPE friends . Ce::neter\' •• V: z en; Ii .,~~~~--~~h~;;. • /' -r,~"""=-(4tf" f'~_1"· SlLG O{, 1 1\LL lvlE/',S._.REIAEf\JTS \'iE~:=:: IAi\DE Ir\ r\:=:=:JRD:\l~CE \"/I-H U.S. ST1\J.) '·.RDS 2 L'.lSCRli-: I01'-I 1\S 1--L.--o;;\ISI---U 8Y :_'._ll\. I -~ '.;,IR\/~Y '.1VA'.; ::'.)Nl)I.JC ~1; ()\ J'..1--'RI 171-'.'-, H, )Cl1.S; f:.NI) I'.-: R~'.:)f-.;IHl ~~ ~1~11) ► 'L''"' ;--Good ---1~),:;v #')// .:.. i-:.A::-s (; '1 A.~J) 11,1 ,t._N ~l~''lf-,;()\I'' )AIA. ~I Samaritar.. 4 EEA~lf\lGS A.I\D =:Is-Ah1CES ':,1----:JWN H:'::RE:JN WERE "cm-PrED" FR:JfJ f:..c-u.ts.L =-E_J Clllll"Ch FA\IEF'.S:'::'3. 5 EEA~ll'JGS A.RE E.4SE[: 0\ STrE FL,t..'JE GRID C:JORDlhlATES A_,",BAfv1A \li:=::ST ZC>IE :_:11_:L (\.i,,J t ... ~ UAIUM) 29 G ---,is '.';URVFY s RASF-) u=>:~1~, f/C'Jl,\,F~HP.-IC)'J F'.~1l,W) I~ F'I Ac-::: M,JD l:OF'.': ~J(T ::,~F;::i::=:FT TO 3:':: t>. RE-RA.CDvE~,T .4\JD ::>~:JP:.:.:RTIC)l,Jl~JG c=-THE C~ GIML GCVEFi~,\E~JT SJR\/EY. N s C RA Pli/C SCAT,P ,,;. '.7 ."".'.7 ""-•c• I IN Ill-) 1 inch -6J IL. SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: DEWBERRY 25353 FRIENDSHIP RD, DAPHNE, AL 36526 JOHN G. A VENT, PLS UC. NO. 27393 JASON ESTES, PE UC. NO. 22714 OWNER/DEVELOPER FIRETHORNE DEVELOPMENT LLC 29891 WOODROW LANE, ST£. 300 SPANISH FORT, AL 36527 FLOOD CERT/FICA TE: 1-1::: ...:-;of-Ju--.: Y _I=-'.: ';\-' I7I\J LC\J=--"x'' ,\':, '.:;C:.1\Llll l"?'.l\/1 -1 -,--;rn,t..l -\'liR'."";-rKY VA\A.::TlvTI\ T A:-:;F'~;--;y':; Fl'.""):-;-; I1'-J::lJR.t.J,.:--;F RA.TF VA.=, CF R.4I n\i1.'IH COU~JTY, .ALAO,-'\VA., VA~ ~JUIV□[R ::;1::;c,JCC·GC:::lv', ,:..:c,r-,q1/IIJhl V \uvn::::l-; (JI :::,uco. I '1\f\lll [\JIJl\1::l=--h' C,Cbj '.~,,=-FX V, lv'A.P =;=-\/'.T-; IJ;',,TF .4PRII ·c1, ?C'CI. SURVEYOR'S CERT/FICA TE: STAT~ CF ALABAMA C:JJ\J I Y :J JALL::1,\'li'-V!C/NTY MAP -/ M/LE \1VF, n=-1,',/R=-RRY, /\ FR\~ (;F II(::F\Jc;=-n =-\JC ~~FF::;>? 1\I\; I .,\(\1, S,JR\/FYC)RS JF D.1\r--iNF, ,L'-_LA3M..tA, f--::::=<EBv ST.-S.TE TH.t.--HE A.3CVE IS /0, CCRRECT H,t>J' c,::;, -)L.AT OF TH:::: I \.JLLC\1\/l~\G JLS::..:llllJ_U -1I~:Jf--:Ll~IY SIIUAI_J 1,J JALU\1.,11'-CCL\ v, .AL.Al3A\.1.A, IC, V,/I p=-c; Nl\l~Jc; /-,T n-=-r,Je;R-f--F/\S-CC)RI\=-~ OF C;c,/\ I ~I_Jr,.J SlJRll\1 c;Ir:;r\ 1\C-, Sf--'.!\11/\j RY VI/\' OR 1:u1.--HE:::,:EcF R::::CCRDE] ,t..,-SLIDE 177.~,-,,:i,, AJD :::,:._H~ THE~\CE, SCI_.-H cu c:::::cR::::Es 22 1\/I~,U LS _j_'.2 SL::..:'.J~JUS w_s I AUJ~J(; IL LA,2'. I r-.:1.:'.'., ~:_;I~,J 01 :._:A,IU '....)JA. L l~U,J sue:=.:iIv SIOI\J, M<l T 1= [AS-\:]ARC\ :J-=,,L_ \/1/ L<::-::rn,fs SIJJDI\/IS O\J (A.K .. t,. -.c.,11~ IC1F>[ ,t,C~Es::, RE::OR]ED A.T liU'.,T EOCK L, -_,Ac:::: ?4, .A [) s-.A~Jc:::: CF 7Sb.':£. =-EET -ei A, CA._)f-'=--U ---.!U3A.R: I1--=--~J'...'.l RUI'-S'.JU II--c\9 UlGRC.=-S j/ \ff\JIJ Ir_:__:., ..::,::c:: SlC:J\U'.:'. u::..s , A I~ S /,[,JC-Cl-1 /:].C1 --I-I I:) i\ C:\_)f-'-I) RI-H,\--\: I71--\l~J-f.)UI\ \:H IH /1 I)1--Cf.;--:-:; jj lvll~d, TF'.~; _,;g ::::Fc:c;,~JI;:~; F:\ST, .1\ n ST1\'~:s JF 57.?:7 FFF--c; :-;/\FPFI; FFR/\R; THFI\C:=-R,_!\J SOUT--i E/: DECR::::E'.::; 42, [-/ ~,.l_.TES :::.3 :::;Eco~m:::: EA.ST, A. D STA'~CE c,=-.3::"JC:_cu FEE-I (.J p,_ :..:.Arru__; R=-=1Ar-:; I HlNC=--r:J\~ S:JIJ I H C11J l)t_(_;R=--lS 22 [\/ ~JL. I lS 2.b '.ilCCY\JUS vv=-:_:., i\ )I'.) /\1\C-0---,~:)_8/ 1---1--1 IJ 1\ C/·JJ_)-I:, f.)f----j,\R· l+NCI-f.'.l.l\ '.<)UII--89 I)1--Gf.)f--<-:; j/ lvll~d,TF'.~; ,':7 ::::FC:O~JI;:~; F:\ST, .1\ n ST1\'~:-T JF 'C/./5 =-=-=-T TJ 1\ C/.=,FFIJ RFR,,'-.~ '.")\ Tf--=-\1\/ES-\'IARCI\ '.JF C·..J.A _ CREEK ESTAT::::S, T--i:::: \/I __ AS li--jAS:::: I -li,LJ,RT 3, J:.5 S-QW\J BY ~iii'-.-' er; P_A, 1--lf--ilCf--f--1=-COf--il)U) A SLIUl 1 FJ4 A: I7U\JC..::=--f-,\_,\j ~~::..::R IH cc L=--c;r;r_t_s j; lv'II\U 1--S ,~~; '.~1--~:'.:iNI)'.~ -:\S , /\ '.l\J~; Si\II: \NI-'.~ 1·,//\·!'.;11\ i\l\l:: IHI-\1\i-S \!1,-\""\C;I\ ,:;1--[ll!i.ll ~RF"< 0ST/,.TF/!, -HF VI I ;\S RH;\SF II, /\!! SHO!/,i~ 'IY I-✓i\~ OC: R /.T T-FC:FOF R::::CDRD::::] ,:::.,-'.:::LID:::: 1576-3, .A [!IST)d'K::::: CF -~1C.25 FEE--c A C.LJJ-,Ec R::::BF,R .~T T--i:::: SUL.I7°'NlSI C'.JRl\l~ Cl-Cl .. P.IL CRll< =--~'.l/1,llS Hl \/LL//:) f-'HASl I AS S7U'.N\J DY ''viA.P Ok H /\ Hl--,:1--CI-f--->CCRl)I-) /\ SI 11)1--1,u,:; /\; IH-NCI-f.';JI\ \JOR H DC l>C;-;-rs j~ lvll~d,TFS _yo; SFC:ow--.:s F1\ST, .I\ :JNC -f--F ',\!FST t•//\RCIr,J CF S.1\I-) ::)J/\II CR=-FK, T-=-\/llll'/ r'-JASC: I, l D STAl'JCE :JF 4i!i.C:C: FEE--c c, 'IEE.AR :JI•] THC: cCUTH IV.o.'!Clfl 0° UUAIL ::..:r-'l=--< Jk Vl: I7=-~,JCl RJ~, i'LlR H 13(,) L:=--,::__;r;r_r_;:; L=: \/1 \I_, t_~:., :Jj S=-CU,JL;:..~ 'NlS I, /\I()\(; IHI-SCI., 1--lvl:\,'(;[\ :)-~)J/'..I '.:k---1--K )kl\/1--, .-\ 1:-'.~ .1\r,Jc-01--/j'.)./9 1--1--1-IC HI-FC1 I\ -:,=-::Ee l\i\ !\JC. T::;;.Ac-:=:=,r,nA [\JS • 2 1'::8 ACRE'.3, k:'ORE C:R LESS, ,L.~,~ LIES Ir\ SLC I Cl\ 2.5. C\\!'~SI If-'. :_:. S:..::U 111, l".:\\(_~L 2 _.1\S , Ji\LDW' '~ COL\ Y, /\L/'-.~/\Vl,1\_ (.t.L_ R::::=-E:;::D\CES TC RECO~J ::,L.i1.-S .AR:::: .AS R::::COR::::1EJ ./J.-F~CBF.T:::: R::::CCRC:S, B.t._J\/1/I~\ C:JJ\J I Y, A.LA.::::iAI·/ r-::;=-\i1/R=-F.:~v JC.HN C A\/:::NT l'.L.S. \o. 273SL3 PHASE 6 OF GOLDEN OAK AT FIRETHORNE FINAL PIAT MAY 21, 2019 -SHEET 1 OF 1 BOUNDARY SURVEY AND FINAL PIAT OF SUBDMSION DESIGN D.E.D. DRAWN A.E.F. CHKO. M.S.P. ENG J.N.E SURVEYOR J.G.A. PROJ MGR M.S.P. I De111rberry· SCALE 1 "=60' PROJ. NO. 50098834 Fl LE 50098834FINAL_PH6 SHEET 1 OF 1 5+6'&#6# 5748';14ž5%'46+(+%#6' (.11&%'46+(+%#6' 616#.#%4'#)' #% 12'052#%' #%  .(1(564''65 .( žZžU   8+%+0+6;/#2 /+.' 2.#; )4170&                .QVU 616#..165  CE 2*#5'  # % .QVU2*#5'  # % .QVU2*#5'  # % .QVU2*#5'  # % .QVU2*#5'  # # % # % .QVU2*#5'  .QVU2*#5'  $ # %                                                                                                                                                                            %1//10#4'# %1//10#4'# %1//10#4'# %1//10#4'# %#%# %# %1//10#4'# %1//10#4'# %1//10#4'# 210& ':+56 &'6'06+10#4'# .#-' ':+56 &'6'06+10#4'#.#-' ':+56 210& ':+56 %1//10#4'#%1//10#4'#%#%# %# %# %# &'6'06+10 &'6'06+10 ž419ž419ž419ž419ž419ž419ž419 ž419 ž419ž 4 1 9  )1.&' 0 1 # - 5+.8'4 . ' # ( )4''0 $ 4 + ' 4 %.7$*175' 211. 9+((.' $#.. 6'00+5 'ZKUV#OGPKVKGU                       6;2+%#..165 )1.&'01#-5+.8'4.'#( )4''0$4+#4 6;2+%#..165 6*'8+..#)' ž:ž 6;2 ž:ž 6;2 6*'8+ . . # ) ' #% %1//10#4'# žZžU   9949 Bellaton Ave Daphne, AL 36526 251.990.9950 fax 251.990-9910 info@preble-rish.net i::::J 100' 50' 0 100' SCALE: 1" = 1 oo' I I I I I __ l ai ----I-..... '~ I ~ ?< '~ ' 1,, t,,J ~-..... ~AY i-1E.ADOWS-··,/ - AVE 60 FT R/W ~ I / : co / 01 :,:i i ~I : I I I I I S1J..Jdriltl11 Clrnrci1 v.-cw (01104) • ,c--·- r,,_, l2 , □ LOT-9 LOT-6 LOT-7 LOT-8 ( ¼. _/ LOT-12 >~ " '-r---~-: LOT-1B LOT-17 LOT-16 LOT-15 I LOT-14 LOT-7 200' LOT-8 LOT-12 LOT-13 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT & POINT OF BEGINNING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14-A OF P.L. \\1LSON'S SUBDMSION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST LOT-14 S89'38'56"E 575.19' I N89'39'1 o"w 575.oo· LOT-15 LOT-16 LOT-17 ?~' -I I I I i ~3 i K I ! ~ -5 i 4P ~ I "· ) ._,_) I " I I I I cc: n., i }~~,is", ~6'.j,~-:-, '-_<..} _// I ' QUAIL 1111 CREEK 0 1\ ( I ' ' ' ' I I I I \ / \\,~, //1// ------_____ / J DR.~ -(Bffi'-OF FAIRHOPE) ------ LOT-2 LOT-4 LOT-14 r LOT-16 t---------j I LOT-18 I ,,., . .., t--------,,--i(MOCIIE) LOT-20 I . t-------+--1;,; w~ I , .-". It[.) j,,-z I '" -·,2· If< I "-·' ~I" ' ., "' I ,u" ui I A~ . II;;~ "":':uSC ' . '. ·o .. ~ I .,.;,,. I :C' Fl. t" ·,:; ,, 0 lf , ~ I 't\ .'o· ; LOT-22 LOT-26 LOT-JO LOT-J2 LOT-J.4 LOT-J6 LOT-44 LOT-46 LOT-4.S LOT-50 LOT-52 LOT-54 LOT-55 LOT-58 COMI.ION AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE POND ' I I ' I I I I I ' I I ' ' I I ' I LOT-1 LOT-J LOT-5 LOT-9 LOT-11 LOT-15 LOT-17 LOT-19 LDT-21 LOT-23 LOT-25 LOT-29 LOT-33 LOT-35 LOT-J7 LOT-J9 LOT-41 LOT-43 LOT-45 LOT-60 LOT-62 LOT-64 LOT-66 sa9·39•51 "E LOT-47 STA TE OF ALABAMA COUNTY OF BAUD\\1N WE, DEWBERRY, ULC, A FIRM OF LICENSED ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS OF DAPHNE, ALABAMA, HEREBY STA TE THAT THE ABOVE IS A CORRECT MAP OR PLAT OF THE FOULOl'<1NG DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATED IN BALDl'<1N COUNTY, ALABAMA, T0-\\1T: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14-A OF FAIRHOPE ACRES SUBDl\/lSION, AS SHOWN BY MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED AT SLIDE 218-8, BALD\\1N COUNTY PROBATE RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID FAIRHOPE ACRES, AND THE EAST MARGIN OF QUAIL RUN SUBDlv1SION, AS SHOWN BY MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED AT SLIDE 1775-A, A DISTANCE OF 1,501.04 FEET TO A THE SOUTH MARGIN OF QUAIL CREEK DRIVE: THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 73S.79 FEET TO A THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF QUAIL CREEK ESTATES, THE v1ULAS PHASE I; THENCE RUN ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH MARGINS OF QUAIL CREEK ESTATES, THE v1LLAS PHASE I, PHASE II, PHASE II-PART B, PHASE IV, PHASE V, AND PHASE VI, THE FOUL0\\1NG DESCRIBED COURSE: SOUTH 00 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 460.00 FEET; SOUTH 00 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 311.93 FEET; SOUTH 00 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 415.34 FEET; SOUTH 00 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 625.58 FEET; SOUTH 89 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 649.48 FEET; SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 660.88 FEET; SOUTH 89 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 667.67 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID QUAIL CREEK ESTATES, THE v1ULAS, RUN SOUTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,329.50 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 663.38 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 524.83 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 51 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 172.07 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 570.80 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 937.17 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 50 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 15.62 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 664.25 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 12 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 427.30 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 745.59 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 298.08 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 27 OF THE AFOREMENTIONED FAIRHOPE ACRES SUBDlv1SION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID FAIRHOPE ACRES SUBDlv1SION, A DISTANCE OF 1,800.95 FEET TO A THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15 THEREOF; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 575.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF ALABAMA HIGHWAY 181; THENCE RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST MARGIN OF ALABAMA HIGHWAY 181, A DISTANCE OF 430.85 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 575.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TRACT CONTAINS 132.23 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (DESCRIPTION COMPOSED FROM THE PROBATE RECORDS AND AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY) WE FURTHER STATE THAT WE HAVE Dlv1DED THE PROPERTY AT THE INSTANCE OF THE OWNER THEREOF. WE FURTHER STATE THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE 111TH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA, EFFECTIVE MAY 7, 2002. DEWBERRY, L.L.C. DAVID E. DIEHL AL. P.L.S. No. 26014 SURVEY NOT VAUD WlTHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL. THIS PROPERTY LIES \\1THIN ZONE "X" (UNSHADED) AS SCALED FROM THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY'S FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF BALD\\1N COUNTY, ALABAMA, MAP NUMBER 01003C0665L, MAP REv1SED DATE JULY 17, 2007. LOT-53 LOT-55 LDT-57 LOT-59 LOT-61 30' REAR r----------------, ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' lw wl LOT-M LOT-70 lo ol I--I Im ml LOT-72 LOT-74 LOT-76 LOT-78 LOT-82 LOT-84 ' ' ' ' ' ' / ~ ci <O <O vra, 1--------1"""'"" LOT-88 LOT-90 LOT-92 3' ~--------, ~ LOT-94 g _____ ___, >-------◄Vl LOT-96 LOT-98 LOT-99 : /---------,\ LOT-100 LOT-B6 I LOT-B7 LOT-89 LOT-90 LOT-93 LOT-95 LOT-97 LOT-101 LOT-102 LOT-103 LOT-104 LOT-105 LOT-106 I. . I 10 01 1~ ~1 ' ' ' ' ' ' I 30' FRONT I L----------------~ LOT-110 \ LOT-109 LOT-108 LOT-107 I LOT-18 I I i r--------1~------J ' ' ' LOT-19 LOT-20 LOT-23 LOT-24 LOT-25 LOT-26 LOT-27 i I I I I ~~---~-1---:::-:::-.'::-:-:-___ .,,,~/-0 '· -------\ (,,----.---:··--,, I i1l ~t-----------l W po,40" "c,,} ,T~ LO, I".'~, C'l' 'f'; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r· gt-----------j ! ' z ' 2•1S, ~2 ; i \ Jcf" I ' ' ' ' ' I ' I ' ' I _/' ' ' z+~•~. l:·;;,C---------/ I '-, _) i ' 1---------l I N89"2 I I I ' I I I 60' POWERLINE EASEMENT r!I-------- --------------------,p>------------1-- I ,~-- _ L_25~NGRESS-& EGRESS EASEMENT-'l3:::,----™:_L t--_□Hr:.:: _--.=™P\_EXISTIN~P~ lt,jGRE~ ~GRESS EA~EMENT =-□}~n 1•.~~-r,C7"_~-ullFII _--= __ lJG[!!_-=-=-----_ ~~~ I - S ONE CRE K 1NO TH SUB c NDER co s1Ru T\ON) ' I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I i-------J: I I I r------J! ,,(V-,, ?<1'•1 ,~ 2•1'' I I I I I \ ;l.'\~':, ·wu·.,r" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I \. t ~ -':oo· BUFFER __,J S89'55'20"W 937.17' ~Et.I/I.INS OF OLD FENCE N89'47'32"W 1340.07' (N89'59'W 1340.8' FTS 1 "'90-1LSl ,,.,.,,. ,i (CASffll.S Et.I/I.INS OF OLD FENCE'-.."_ : r_-/. ,.0··,)0 ' I ,: . .,,1-8, L-_-_ _,-, 1.1'1·1 'v....,~ .• 1il t---------1~ w • r-- f" >----------g V, 0 C > r 0 ::0 "' "' "' C) 0 r .,, 0 0 C ::0 1/1 "' BUFFER~ 1/2"CRf'(0804) 17.4'N a: 9.4'W 30' REAR r-------7 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' IW WI 10 01 IVi ti'il ' ' :.n -ll): ' ' ' ' ' ' I 25'FRONT I L,. _______ .J ' l---,ct'7'}"0,-·· ---4'~• ci r;; tl( FIRETHORNE I----'-' A PIANNED UNIT DEVWPMENT ' ' ' ' i:,·uw .. ,. 2· ~c· .,· 7,., MASTER PIAN __ ,,/ / JANUARY 15, 2018 -SHEEf I OF I SHEETS : ~so· :~ f ( /,~-,·_· ---""'-'';z."l!ll=•-· -:I t-------BO_UNDAR_~_Y_S_UR:_:vEY __ &_P_.u_n~. _PlAN _______ ____, -~--'l ~• D~IGN D.E.D. D-N D.~D. CHKD. D.E.D. "."' ENG J.N.E SURVEYOR D.E.D. PROJ MGR J.G.A. N89'47'32"W 524.83' 80" POWERUNE EASEMENT 1-1/1" OEPr U Deaaberrt SCALE 1"-100' CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS CML SURVEYING • SITE PI.ANNING PROJ. FIUE SHEET NO. 28D.0065 2800065-PUD 1 OF 1 1 IR 19.05 Carrigan PUD Rezoning ‐ July 1, 2019    Planning Commission     July 1, 2019    Informal Review    Case: IR 19.05 Carrigan Property    Project Name: Carrigan PUD    Property Owner /Applicant:  Carrigan Properties, LLC    General Location:  The property is located on the  west side of St. Hwy. 181 just  north of Bay Meadows.     Project Type: Major (Outside   the corporate limits, inside the   City of Fairhope Planning   Jurisdiction.    Number of lots: 133 lots    Project Acreage:  36    Zoning District: Unzoned    PPIN Number:  77751,15244,  226928    Engineer of record: Ercil  Godwin    School District: Fairhope   Elementary, Middle and High   School     Report prepared by:  Nancy  Milford, EIT #6537, CAPZO   Certified    Recommendation: Planning  Commission To Provide Insight   and Feedback        N Legend --•SUti,itctP~ CITY OF FA IRHOPE ZONING Zo ning ~TR To,""R""" R-A Retldcntlll I .A,gno.ilwr• DIMl'IO R-1 low D en'ICy' S.,g¼'W1 ml y RH•I f"7 Rll•l Rl(C) R...2 Medi.Im Oentit)' sw.i;,1e.F1m.1 ~ .. R-3 HiQl'IOensty$;1'1gie-ftmly R-3 PG Ii PeuOICaree-.n, S iA gJe Fe mly [=:I R-J TN TOWIIIOCQe S~;Pe Femi)" ~ R-' L.owOettUyMUli--F•mi ly R-S "~" Oen.Uy OWl!llr,9 Ruide"4iat R--i Moblo l'lom ♦ Ped: D•tr'ltl .. e-.1 Loc.l S~n9011tnct. &-2 Gen.,el B11snc• Oisll'ld i.-i 8-3.i Toun• Rnort lodgr,g Diltn.a .. S-3b Toon• Reson Commerdal Se1'ia Di11Ma ~ 9-,,1 91111.n-e-• and f:lrotes.tlon111J Cl'W1Ct .. l,t.1 tJ;fttlndll9-t11al0 1-Mttel ••. , .... ng POD 4Jllnned Ont Oew10pmen1 CJ •amtLo,u .. l:olmcl ii I 2 IR 19.05 Carrigan PUD Rezoning ‐ July 1, 2019  Summary of Request:  The applicant is requesting an informal review for approval of the proposed  Carrigan Planned Unit Development for an approximate 133 lot subdivision located on 36 Acres.  The  project is located on the property is located on the west side of St. Hwy. 181 just north of Bay  Meadows Subdivision.  The associated investor in this project is Mr. Jonathan Carrigan of Carrigan  Properties LLC .  The surveyor of record is Mr. Ercil Godwin, of Sawgrass.   The applicant is presenting  two PUD layouts to Planning Commission for feedback.  The layouts are attached at the end of the staff  report.      The PUD project acreage of is 36 acres. The 36 acres is situated on 3 different parcels as follows:  PPIN:     ACREAGE:    CURRENT ZONING:  226928              2±      R‐2  15244           5±      R‐A  77751          48±       R‐6    The applicant is choosing to keep a portion of the 48‐ acre parcel as R‐6 in order to maintain the  existing trailer park.       Site Photos:               Subject Property on Hwy. 181     Portion of the larger parcel to remain R‐6       Recommendation:   For the benefit of the applicant and staff, please provide insight and comments  regarding the proposed PUD Layouts.     CALLAWAY DRIVETHOMPSON HALL ROADALABAMA HIGHWAY 181SONGBIRD LANE11143 Old Highway 31 Spanish Fort, AL 36527 818 N. McKenzie Street Foley, AL 36535 Phone: (251) 544-7900 Phone: (251) 970-7900 CHECKED BY: SHEET: DATE: DRAWN BY: SCALE:NUMBER:REVISION:DATE:CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT 1 - CARRIGAN PUD 133 LOT, 50'X110' LAYOUT DR HORTON 1" = 100' JUNE, 2019 1.0 I I -----------~ -----------~ I I I I L _____ ~ I I I I I ~ - ------+--- ~--_j -----+---- -~ I I I L ___________ ~ MAX. SITE DATA OVERALL TOTAL ACREAGE: 55 ACRES± TOTAL ACREAGE OF PUD: 36 ACRES± TOTAL ACREAGE TO REMAIN R-6 ZONING: 18 ACRES± TOTAL ACREAGE TO REZONE TO R-2 ZONING: 0.90 ACRES± TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF STREET: 5,600 L.F.± (ON-SITE) 600 L.F.± (OFF-SITE) LOT DATA MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,500 S.F.± (50' X 11 O') MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE: 55% COVERAGE OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: 25% OF REQUIRED REAR YARD (600 S.F. X 25% = REQUIRED REAR YARD AREA: 50'X12' = 600 S.F.± MAX ALLOWABLE COVERAGE OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OF TOTAL LOT AREA = 2.7% MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 30 FEET FRONT = MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE SETBACKS: FRONT = 20 FEET REAR = 1 2 FEET SIDE = 5 FEET SIDE STREET = 5 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACKS: BEHIND REAR BUILDING LINE OF PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE REAR = 5 FEET SIDE = 5 FEET PROPOSED DENSITY OF PUD 150 S.F.±) GRAPHIC SCALE I I I I / r 1 --1 --------1 --------1 -----------r---------I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I I 100 0 ( IN FEET ) 1 lllch = 100 ft. ENGINEERING -SURVEYING -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 100 CALLAWAY DRIVETHOMPSON HALL ROADALABAMA HIGHWAY 181SONGBIRD LANE11143 Old Highway 31 Spanish Fort, AL 36527 818 N. McKenzie Street Foley, AL 36535 Phone: (251) 544-7900 Phone: (251) 970-7900 CHECKED BY: SHEET: DATE: DRAWN BY: SCALE:NUMBER:REVISION:DATE:CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT 2- CARRIGAN PUD 134 LOT, 50'X110' LAYOUT DR HORTON 1" = 100' JUNE, 2019 1.0 I I -----------~ -----------~ I I I I ~ - -----+--- 11-------1 I 11--~~_j 85 I I 1---~ 84 11-------1 82 I 11-------1 I 1--~~_J OPEN SPACE 2.3 ACRES± I I I I I L __ _ ~--------------------- MAX. SITE DATA OVERALL TOTAL ACREAGE: 55 ACRES± TOTAL ACREAGE OF PUD: 36 ACRES± TOTAL ACREAGE TO REMAIN R-6 ZONING: 18 ACRES± TOTAL ACREAGE TO REZONE TO R-2 ZONING: 0.90 ACRES± TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF STREET: 5,700 L.F.± LOT DATA MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,500 S.F.± (50' X 11 O') MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE: 55% COVERAGE OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: 25% OF REQUIRED REAR YARD (600 S.F. REQUIRED REAR YARD AREA: 50'X12' = 600 S.F.± MAX ALLOWABLE COVERAGE OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OF TOTAL LOT AREA MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 30 FEET FRONT MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE SETBACKS: FRONT = 20 FEET REAR = 1 2 FEET SIDE = 5 FEET SIDE STREET = 5 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACKS: = BEHIND REAR BUILDING LINE OF PRINCIPLE REAR = 5 FEET SIDE = 5 FEET PROPOSED DENSITY OF PUD PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS: 134 LOTS STRUCTURE X 25% = 150 S.F.±) = 2.7% D NET GROSS DENSITY: 134 LOTS/36 ACRES = 3.7 UNITS PER TOTAL AREA OF R.O.W. AND DETENTION = 9.5 ACRES± DENSITY: 134 LOTS/ (36 TOTAL ACRES -9.5 ACRES R.O.W. & PONDS) = CURRENT ALLOWABLE DENSITY IN R-6 ZONED PROPERTY = 6 UNITS 5.0 UNITS PER ACRE PER ACRE 133 I I I I L_ _______________________ '""~~,r------7 --7 I 32 I -----1 I 1---~~~ I ----------,--------~~---------j ,=a I I r/ ' 1 , I 69 I 68 1 67 I 66 I 58 I 59 : 60 I 47 I 44 I 45 : 46 1 33 30 I 1----~ 29 : ---1 28 I 8.8 COMMON AREA TOTAL COMMON AREA: 12.3 ACRES± (34%) TOTAL DETENTION: 3.5 ACRES± TOTAL OPEN SPACE (LESS ANY DETENTION): 8.8 ACRES± (24%) TOTAL OPEN SPACE INCLUSIVE OF ALLOWABLE DETEf\lTION POND AREA: ACRES± OPEN SPACE + 3.5 ACRES± ALLOWABLE POND AREA = 12.3 ACRES± TOTAL REQUIRED OPEN SPACE PER NET DENSITY CALCULATION: 20% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR R-6 ZONED PROPERTY = 15% (34%) I I 1 , I I I I 1 • , L_J_J _ _l__ i 1....--L+_L __ I i 1--L+_L __ I ! ;;I 36 ACRES± TO REZONE TO PUD -II z 0 I i-~~---1 i -~~+-~ 8 --1 i 1--~~+-:~-1 ! : 64 1 56 49 1 42 35 I 1-6;--I -;;--LI -;0-I ll----:;-l.l -;6---II I I I I ,~~~ I -i-71 -r-I --,--i-11 -r--I 11-------1 lt--:6.._J 25 1----~ l' 54 : 53 I 52 ! 51 1' 40 ! 39 : 38 ! 37 I L~~--\1 I I l\. I I ______ l~-------~---- ENGINEERING -SURVEYING -CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OPEN SPACE 2.8 ACRES± I n-,--,-~ -----! I 201 191 181 171 161 1 I I I I I I I -------- GRAPIITC SCALE 100 0 ( 1H FEET ) 1 Inch = 100 ft. 100