HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-06-2013 Planning Commission MinutesMav6. 2013
Planning Cc,mmission ,\Jinuks
The Planning Commission met Monday, May 6th, 2013 at 5:00 PM at the City Municipal
Complex, 161 N. Section Street in the Council Chambers.
Present: Lee Turner, Chairperson; Tim Kant; Jennifer Fidler; Bob Clark: Bernie Fogarty
Dick Charles; Councilman Rich Mueller; Jonathan Smith, Planning Director: Nancy
Milford, Planner: and Emily Boyett, Secretary.
Absent: George Roberds, Vice-Chair
Chairman Lee Turner called the meeting to order at 5:01 PM and announced the meeting
is being recorded. The minutes of the April 1, 2013 meeting were considered and Dick
Charles moved to accept the minutes as written and was 2nd by Bob Clark. Motion
carried with one abstention by Bernie Fogarty.
Mr. Turner introduced Bernie Fogarty and announced he is the newest Commissioner and
welcomed him.
IR 13.02 Request of Oscar Anez for an Informal Review of 20252 State Hwy. 181 for
rezoning from R-A Residential/Agricultural District to B-2 General Business
District, Joe Courtney. Jonathan Smith gave the staff report saying the property is
located on the east side of State Hwy. 181 just south of the intersection of Fairhope
A venue and State Hwy. 181 and consist of approximately 2. 79 acres. The property is
bordered to the north by unzoned property (Wal-Mart), to the west by State Hwy. I 81
and PUD zoned property that will consist of 6 or 7 businesses if built. to the south and
east by Residential/ Agricultural zoned property. Mr. Smith stated there is an access
management plan for State Hwy. 181; therefore, property access issues will be regulated
by that plan at the time of site plan review or building permit application. Staff has
concerns that rezoning this property will have an effect on the future trend of
development in this area. The 181 Corridor will most likely be a topic of discussion
during the future Comprehensive Plan review and revision process. Staff recommends
the Commission provide insight and comments regarding the proposed zoning change.
Joe Courtney of Courtney Morris Appraisal and Real Estate addressed the Commission
on behalf of the applicant. He explained the applicant is proposing to rezone his property
to B-2 General Business District and the properties along Hwy. 181 are already moving
toward a commercial flavor as the state continues to widen Hwy. 181. He stated there is
an old. dilapidated single family structure on the property currently and the widening of
Hwy. 181 will take out the structure so it is ofno value. Mr. Charles asked if the
applicant has spoken to Wal-Mart for the possible expansion or a possible sateliite office
and Mr. Courtney responded no, they haw not Mayor Kant stated there will only be one
out parcel left after \forphy Oil builds the proposed gas station: however. Wal-Mart will
be proposing more lots eventually and he asked if the applicant has considered a B-4
Business and Professional Office District. !\fr. Courtney responded his has not discussed
any other commercial zoning designations but B-2 would allow more options, be more
marketable. and possibly a greater return on his investment. Mr. Smith stated the Comp.
Plan currently pinpoints this area as a neighborhood village center and Wal-Mart already
exceeds the commercial square footage. Mayor Kant asked about road improvements
and traffic issues. ""vk Smith responded a traffic study '.vouid be required for the site at
time of site plan; however. he is not sure of AU)OT. s plans because they have changed
several times. Mr. !\fueller asked if the City makes more money off a commercial
\fa} 6. 2013
Plann111g Commission Minutes
property as opposed to residential/agriculture and Mayor Kant responded not on utilities
but with property taxes. Mr. Charles suggested speaking with the neighbors to get their
consensus as to what they would like to see in the area. Mr. Turner stated Hwy 181 is at
the beginning of development he wants to see it done correctly. He said the Comp. Plan
calls for commercial and high density around the commercial so he doesn't have an issue
with this property being commercial but he would like to see a PUD where there is more
control. He referenced the Ogden A venue Corridor Plan that was discussed at the AP A
Conference and said he would like for a plan to be approved to give guidance as to how
H,vy. 181 should be developed. Mr. Fogarty stated there is a lot of traffic but the area is
growing and will eventually be commercial so the City should be smart and protect the
residential properties. Mr. Clark said he agrees with everyone· s comments so far and
there should be input from the community and this is an opportunity to start fresh. Mrs.
Fidler stated there is a lot of unzoned property in this area that could be anything. She
also said the Commission denied commercial zoning to another parcel in this area
approximately two years ago. Mayor Kant stated the City has worked hard to get what
we have and we should study this and take the time to do it right Mr. Charles stated this
area could fall into the same trap as northern Greeno Road if the City is not careful.
UR 13.04 Request of Southern Light for an 11.52.11 Review and Approval of the
proposed installation of approximately 2,917 linear feet of fiber optic cable for
Hartmann, Blackmon & Kilgore, John Hixson. The project will run along the east
side of Section Street from Gayfer A venue to Volanta A venue to service Hartmann,
Blackmon & Kilgore at 708 N. Section Street. Jonathan Smith gave the staff report
saying the project will consist of 2,911 linear feet of aerial fiber optic construction and 6'
of underground construction with the placement of two hand holes. He also explained
the applicant is allowed by the City's Code of Ordinances to be overhead if there is
already existing overhead. Staff recommendation is to approve conditional upon the
following:
I . The applicant shall comply with the minimum requirements as stated by the City
of Fairhope Building Official. code Enforcement Officer, and the Electrical, Gas,
and Water and Sewer Superintendents in the Staff Report.
2. Any mechanical equipment should be painted Munsell green.
3. The applicant shall sign all drawings submitted.
John Hixson was present to answer any questions. Mayor Kant asked which poles they
would be attaching to and Mr. Hixson responded the existing poles on the east side of
Section Street. Mayor Kant said the City is looking at putting those lines underground
within the next 5 years and asked who will pay for these lines to be installed underground
and Mr. Hixson responded Southern Light will pay for it. Dick Charles moved to accept
the staff recommendation to approve with the following conditions:
I. The applicant shall comply with the minimum requirements as stated by the City
of Fairhope Building Official, code Enforcement Officer, and the Electrical, Gas,
and Water and Sewer Superintendents in the Staff Report.
2. Any mechanical equipment should be painted Munsell green.
3. The applicant shail sign all drawings submitted.
4. The applicant shall provide a written agreement to pay the cost of installing their
line underground.
Jennifer Fidler 2nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
May6,2013
Plannmg Comm1s,ion \1inutcs
UR 13.05 Request of Mediacom for an 11.52.11 Review and Approval of the
proposed underground installation of approximately 3,824 linear feet of CA TV
cable throughout the Magnolias Subdivision, Bill Huggins. Jonathan Smith gave the
staff report saying the project will consist of plowing, directional and pneumatic boring,
and placement of cable pedestals. Staff recommendation is to approve conditional upon
the following:
1. The applicant shall comply ,vith the minimum requirements as stated by the
City of Fairhope Building Official and Code Enforcement Officer in the Staff
Report;
2. Any mechanical equipment should be painted Munsell green; and
3. All applicable City regulations shall be met.
Bob Clark moved to accept the staff recommendation to approve conditional upon the
follo,ving:
1. The applicant shall comply with the minimum requirements as stated by the
City of Fairhope Building Official and Code Enforcement Officer in the Staff
Report;
2. Any mechanical equipment should be painted Munsell green; and
3. All afplicable City regulations shall be met
Dick Charles 211 the motion and the motion carried unanimously.
Bernie Fogarty stated he has a conflict with case SR 13.01 and left the room.
SR 13.01 Request of Walcott, Adams & Verneuille for Site Plan approval of25 S.
Section Street, a mixed use development, Mac Walcott. The project is located on the
east side of Section Street, just south of Fairhope A venue (the old Objects building).
Jonathan Smith gave the staff report saying the property is zoned B-2 General Business
District and is located within the Central Business District (CBD). The applicant is
proposing a 35' three story, mixed use building consistent with the current zoning. The
applicant has two possible floor plans. one with three commercial units and two
residential units; and one with two commercial units and two residential units. Both of
the proposed plans feature residential on the upper floors and commercial belovv. Mr.
Smith stated the applicant is requesting a waiver from the requirement of 8' sidewalks in
the CBD due to requirement placing a peculiar aesthetic and waterproofing challenge for
adjacent building and that nearly all of the existing buildings in the part of the CBD do
not meet the 8' sidewalk requirement. Staff recommendation is to approve contingent
upon the following conditions:
1. The installation of an 8' sidewalk.
2. Kim Burmeister' s additional comments being added to the construction drawings.
Mac Walcott addressed the Commission saying the design of the building has two inserts
that provide more than the 8' width in those areas. He stated that in order to achieve the
intent of the ordinance it anticipates that a lot of the great Fairhope buildings will be lost.
Mr. Charles asked what would decide whether the building will be 312 or 2/2 and Mr.
Walcott responded leasing and a market study. Mr. Clark asked for clarification on the
waterproofing issues and Mr. Walcott explained the northwest corner of the building is
where all of the water flov.s and setting the building back a foot will create a hardship for
the adjacent properties and will be a design challenge. :\1ayor Kant asked what width is
proposed frx the sidewalk and Mr. Walcott responded T v,ith t,vo insets that \vill give
more area than the 8' that the ordinance is requiring. Mayor Kant questioned the location
3
May 6. 2013
Planning Comn11ssion \imutes
of the balcony posts and lighting under the balcony. Mr. Walcott responded the posts
will be right behind the curb and there are currently two street lights on either side of the
proposed balcony which will remain and indirect lighting will be installed underneath.
Mr. Smith stated staff has been flexible with applicants in the past regarding sidewalk
widths and with the inserts he feels that the City's intent is met with this design. Mayor
Kant stated there is a crosswalk in front of this site and the City is getting ready to install
a landing onto Section Street and Mr. Walcott stated it will not be an issue. Mr. Charles
asked if there will be an elevator and Mr. Walcott responded there is plenty of room for
one. Mrs. Fidler asked if there will be enough room for to allow vehicles in the parallel
parking to open their doors and Mr. Walcott responded yes they will work the location of
the poles to the parking spaces. Tim Kant moved to accept the staff recommendation to
approve the site plan and the waiver from the s· sidewalk requirement and forward a
favorable recommendation to the City Council. Bob Clark 2nd the motion and the motion
carried unanimously. Mr. Mueller stated for the record the granting of the waiver was
due to over fifty percent of the building will have more width than is required. Mr. Smith
stated the City's ordinances are not in place to prohibit historic preservation efforts.
Bernie Fogarty re-entered the room.
New/ Old Business
Mr. Smith stated there is a very informal review for a citizen regarding the possible
subdivision of an estate settlement and he would like to get the Commissioner's input.
He provided the Commissioners with a sketch plat of the property. Mr. Smith stated the
property is outside city limits and with the current configuration one of the proposed lots
does not meet the City's requirements for unzoned lots. He stated the Subdivision
Regulation requires 75' width of frontage upon a publicly maintained right-of-way and
the proposed lot would only have 62.33' of access for an eight acre parcel. Mr. Clark
asked the total acreage of the site and Mr. Smith responded ten acres with two I acre lots
and one 8 acre lot. Mrs. Fidler asked if the lot could be accessed by Gayfor Road
Extension and Mr. Smith stated that right-of-way is not open. Mr. Turner stated he
would not be opposed to the configuration since the 62' would only serve as an access for
multiple lots if further developed. Mr. Fogarty asked why the requirement is 75'and Mr.
Smith responded it is the same as the County's require for unzoned lots. Mayor Kant
suggested placing the condition that the 62' cannot be built on and Mrs. Fidler stated the
substandard lots should not be allowed unless there is a hardship and the City should
uphold the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Mr. Turner stated an existing
building will have to be tom down in order to meet the regulations. Mr. Clark asked if
the County were to allow the proposed configuration would the City and Mr. Smith
responded no, the City's regulations will stand. There was discussion regarding right-of-
way widths and it was suggested to reduce to 62' to 50' to clearly show that it is for
access only.
Having no further business, Dick Charles moved to adjourn and was 2nd by Tim Kant.
Moti:n passed un~~ was duly adjourn :02 PM
4