Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-07-2011 Planning Commission MinutesFebruary 7, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes 1 The Planning Commission met Monday, February 7, 2011 at 5:00 PM at the City Administration Building, 161 N. Section Street in the Council Chambers. Present: Jean Wilson, Chairperson; Dick Charles, Vice-Chair; Bob Clark; Gary Moore; Lee Turner; Jennifer Fidler; George Roberds and Mike Ford. Jonathan Smith, Planning and Building Director; Nancy Milford, Planner; Emily Boyett, Secretary Absent: Tim Kant Chairperson Jean Wilson called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM and announced the meeting is being recorded. She welcomed George Roberds to the Commission and thanked Mike Ford for his time on the Commission, as this will be his last meeting. The minutes of the December 6, 2010 meeting were considered and Dick Charles moved to accept the minutes as written and was 2nd by Gary Moore. Motion carried unanimously. ZC 11.01 Public hearing for the request of the City of Fairhope Planning and Building Department for a proposed pervious parking amendment to the Zoning Ordinance – Article IV, Section E. Parking, Jonathan Smith. Mr. Smith gave the staff report saying the staff has been evaluating various alternative low impact development technologies for improving the management of stormwater and a minimum requirement for pervious paving would be a practical alternative for inclusion in the Parking Section of the Zoning Ordinance. He stated the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the Fairhope Environmental Advisory Board (FEAB) support a requirement for the use of pervious paving parking surfaces. The Planning Staff is proposing that 25% of proposed parking spaces for a commercial development be pervious. The proposed amendment to Article IV, Section E. Parking of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance is as follows: 6) Pervious Parking: a) Twenty five percent (25%) of all parking spaces shall be constructed of a pervious material. Pervious materials used may include brick pavers, pervious asphalt, pervious concrete, and other pervious materials to be approved by the City of Fairhope Planning and Building Director. b) The pervious material shall be maintained following industry standards of no less than once per calendar year or per manufacturer’s instructions if the manufacturer’s requirements are more stringent. Failure to perform the required maintenance activities could result in enforcement action by the City. Staff Recommendation is for the Planning Commission to approve the proposed pervious parking amendment to the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. Wilson opened the public hearing. Jim Horner, FEAB Chairman, addressed the Commission saying the Board submitted a letter in support of the proposed amendment and feels the 25% recommendation is a good start in terms of managing stormwater. He stated the Police Department’s front walkway and the Publix parking area are two sites that have used pervious materials. Mr. Horner said the Board would also like to see cut- curb bio-retention areas and a reduction in mandated number of public parking spaces per square footage as stormwater managing tools. Having no one else to speak, Mrs. Wilson closed the public hearing. Mr. Ford asked what the cost difference would be to use a pervious surface and Mr. Smith responded it would vary depending on the material used. Mr. Smith said the prices have gone down for pervious materials and if gravel were to be approved in an area then it would be a significant difference than if asphalt or concrete was used. Mr. Turner said he was concerned with this requirement being applied to February 7, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes 2 every development across the board regardless of the size. Mr. Smith stated the provision to allow the Planning and Building Director to approve other materials will help smaller developments. He said he does not want this amendment to be a negative aspect of development. Mr. Charles said stormwater is a major problem in this County and permeability is a concern in this area. Mr. Clark asked if gravel would be an acceptable material and Mr. Smith stated yes, on certain sites it would be allowed. Mrs. Fidler said she has seen the pervious asphalt for small car parking in a parking lot. She said the cost of pervious concrete versus regular concrete is about a dollar a yard less, but the pervious asphalt is different and she doesn’t know the costs for it. Mrs. Fidler recommended adding that sites with twelve or less parking spaces not be required to have the 25% pervious parking area, as to not be a burden on the smaller business. Mr. Smith said staff would be comfortable with including a number of parking spaces which would trigger the requirement. Mr. Smith recommended the trigger be eight parking spaces, which would be the break in space requirements based on building square footage listed in parking schedule. Lee Turner moved to accept the staff recommendation to approve and forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council for the proposed pervious parking amendment to Article IV, Section E. Parking of the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance as follows: 6) Pervious Parking: a) Twenty five percent (25%) of all parking spaces shall be constructed of a pervious material. Pervious materials used may include brick pavers, pervious asphalt, pervious concrete, and other pervious materials to be approved by the City of Fairhope Planning and Building Director. b) The pervious material shall be maintained following industry standards of no less than once per calendar year or per manufacturer’s instructions if the manufacturer’s requirements are more stringent. Failure to perform the required maintenance activities could result in enforcement action by the City. c) Projects that require eight or less parking spaces are not subject to the twenty-five percent (25%) pervious parking requirement. Dick Charles 2nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously. ZC 11.02 Public hearing for the request of the City of Fairhope Planning and Building Department for a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow restaurants in B-1 Local Shopping District – Article III, Section B. Allowed Uses, Jonathan Smith. Mr. Smith gave the staff report saying the current definition does not allow a restaurant in the B-1 zoning district. Currently restaurant use is only allowed by right in the B-2 General Business and B-3b Tourist Resort Commercial Service District. Restaurants are allowed in the B-3a Tourist Resort Lodging District subject to appeal and to the Board of Adjustment and subject to possible special conditions by the Board of Adjustment. Staff is proposing that restaurant use be allowed in the B-1 district subject to appeal to the Board of Adjustment and subject to possible special conditions by the Board of Adjustment. This will give the City the authority to deny an incompatible restaurant use if the site and surrounding conditions are not appropriate/adequate for a restaurant use. The City will also be able to approve a restaurant use in the B-1 district if the proposed restaurant/café is compatible with the site and surrounding area. No drive thru restaurants will be allowed in the B-1 district. Staff Recommendation is to approve the proposed restaurant use in the B-1 zoning district subject to the following conditions: 1) restaurants in the B-1 zoning district may be permitted only on appeal to the Board of Adjustment and may be subject to special conditions; 2) drive thru restaurants shall not February 7, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes 3 be permitted in the B-1 zoning district. Mrs. Wilson opened the public hearing, having no one present to speak, she closed the public hearing. Mr. Charles stated if the restaurant use is allowed in the other business districts then why would it not be allowed in the B-1 district. He said it didn’t seem equitable to him. Mrs. Fidler said she considered the Comprehensive Plan which calls for walkable communities and to allow a restaurant in the B-1 district would promote walkability. Mr. Ford stated the gentleman that designed the City’s Comp Plan is from Kansas City and if anyone were to visit there they would see restaurants in the communities and said he thinks it is a good idea. Dick Charles moved to accept the staff recommendation to approve and forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council for the proposed restaurant use in the B-1 zoning district subject to the following conditions: 1) restaurants in the B-1 zoning district may be permitted only on appeal to the Board of Adjustment and may be subject to special conditions; 2) drive thru restaurants shall not be permitted in the B-1 zoning district. Lee Turner 2nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously. UR 11.01 Request of Southern Light for 11.52.11 Utility Review and Approval of the proposed installation of approximately 2209 linear feet of fiber optic cable, Samantha McAllister. The project will run along the west side of Greeno Road and along the south side of Nichols Avenue to service the Oyster House Head Quarters Building on Nichols Avenue. Nancy Milford gave the staff report saying Southern Light plans to extend an existing network with approximately 694 linear feet of aerial cable, 1440 linear feet by directional bore, and 75 linear feet of trenched fiber optic cable. Staff recommendation is to approve as requested with the following conditions: 1) all existing utilities must be located and proper separation must be maintained between utilities; 2) BMP’s shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations; 3) ground conditions in the right-of-ways shall be returned to original or preconstruction condition or better; 4) all ALDOT permits shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a right-of-way permit; 5) all plans and permits shall be submitted with the City of Fairhope Right-Of-Way permit application; 6) guy wires shall be installed on all locations where the route dead-ends or changes by 90 degrees, guys and anchors shall be provided and installed by Southern Light or their contractor and shall meet NESC code requirements. No joint use guying will be allowed; 7) aerial attachments shall be subject to joint use billing at the existing attachment rates and Southern Light shall notify Electrical Superintendent Scott Sligh in writing when attachments are complete; 8) the contractor shall stabilize each disturbed area at the end of each day; 9) the contractor shall remove accumulated sediment from streets and sidewalks daily; 10) the contractor shall add sod as the permanent cover to disturbed right-of-ways (hay and seed shall not be acceptable as permanent cover); 11) the project shall comply with all City ordinances, including but not limited to the City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance. Andru Bramblett of Southern Light was present to answer any questions. Mr. Charles asked if Oyster House was the only driving agent for this installation and if any other individuals would be allowed to connect to this line and Mr. Bramblett responded yes, the primary reason for the extension is Oyster House but others would be able to hook on as well. Jennifer Fidler moved to accept the staff recommendation to approve as requested with the following eleven conditions: 1) all existing utilities must be located and proper separation must be maintained between utilities; 2) BMP’s shall be installed at boring sites and trench February 7, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes 4 locations; 3) ground conditions in the right-of-ways shall be returned to original or preconstruction condition or better; 4) all ALDOT permits shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a right-of-way permit; 5) all plans and permits shall be submitted with the City of Fairhope Right-Of-Way permit application; 6) guy wires shall be installed on all locations where the route dead-ends or changes by 90 degrees, guys and anchors shall be provided and installed by Southern Light or their contractor and shall meet NESC code requirements. No joint use guying will be allowed; 7) aerial attachments shall be subject to joint use billing at the existing attachment rates and Southern Light shall notify Electrical Superintendent Scott Sligh in writing when attachments are complete; 8) the contractor shall stabilize each disturbed area at the end of each day; 9) the contractor shall remove accumulated sediment from streets and sidewalks daily; 10) the contractor shall add sod as the permanent cover to disturbed right-of-ways (hay and seed shall not be acceptable as permanent cover); 11) the project shall comply with all City ordinances, including but not limited to the City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance. Dick Charles 2nd the motion and the motion carried unanimously. Old/New Business Annual Public Input Meeting – Jonathan Smith proposed to have the Annual Public Input Meeting in April. It will be held after the regular meeting at 6:00 pm. He stated staff will notify the neighborhood groups and proper legal ad notices will be made. Medical Overlay District – Mr. Smith stated staff will be presenting the zoning amendment for the Medical Overlay District at the April PC meeting. March PC Meeting – Mr. Smith stated there will not be a March PC meeting. He said there were no cases submitted and there is also a Mardi Gras parade that night. Mr. Ford said he has been receiving complaints regarding large vehicles parking in the corner spaces which are interfering with sight visibility. Mrs. Fidler stated she has been looking into creating “small car” parking with corner spaces to help with sight visibility. Mr. Smith said Public Works is experimenting with small car parking spaces City Warehouse and have one labeled as such. Mr. Clark asked Mr. Ford if he was receiving complaints for all over town or just in particular areas. Mr. Ford responded it was all over town. Mr. Clark said he has that problem at the Post Office when trying to back out from parking spots. Having no further business, Dick Charles moved to adjourn and was 2nd by Jennifer Fidler. Motion passed unanimously and the meeting was duly adjourned at 5:34 pm. ________________________ ________________________ Jean Wilson, Chairperson Emily Boyett, Secretary