HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-20-2016 Regular MeetingPublic Meeting Notice
Committee: Fairhope Personnel Board
Date & Time: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 at 7:00 a.m.
Place: Delchamps Room
161 North Section Street
Subject: Updating Compensation Study RFQ
Notice must be stamped, dated and initialed before posted on
bulletin board.
POSTED
)
JuL.i 13 ~o rto
SIGNATURE
Fairhope Personnel Board Meetmg
Agenda -August 4, 2016
7:00 a.m. in the Delchamps Room
City Hall-161 No Section Street, Fairhope, AL
I. Approval of July 20, 2016 minutes
II Review of old business
1. Refine draft of RFQ
2 . Develop timeline for updating compensation study including meeting
with department heads
III Presentation from Mayor Kant on his needs for u~ted study
IV. Update from HR Director, Pandora Heathcoe
IV. Closing comments from Board Members, HR Director, and Council Liaison
Schedule Of Future Meetings
{Note: Regular meetings are on the 3 rd Thursday of each month at 7:15 a.m. in the
Delchamps Room at City Hall, 161 North Section Street, Fairhope, AL.)
• Next regular meeting: September 15, 2016
COUNTY OF BALDWIN
Personnel Board met at 7 :00 a.m.
Delchamp's Room
161 N Section Street, Fairhope, AL 36532
Wednesday , July 21 , 2016
Present:
Members: Diane Thomas, Chairman; Lorenzo Howard, Jenny Erfloes, Pandora Heathcoe ,
Human Resources Director
Absent: Scherry Douglas , Rob Stankoski, and Kevin Boone, cw-Council Liaison.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 a.m.
Minutes from the June 29, 2016 meeting were approved by a tid,t motion set forth by Jenny
Erdoes and second by Lorenzo Howard.
Under old business:
Diane Thomas , Chairman, began the review of the draft RFQ ~t was sent to all Board
members. She requested feedback from the Board as to their concerns, additions to the RFQ or
changes to its format.
Jenny Erdoes and Lorenzo Howard suggested several grammar changes throughout the draft
RFQ along with suggestions for changes to the order of items in the Contract Milestones and
Scope of Work sections. Board members unanimously agreed the importance of the Board
meeting with each department head to review organizational charts, structure of the department
and the various job descriptions for that department. Diane recommended that Mayor Kant
attend the next meeting to discuss his concerns for the compensation study, any gaps he feels
exist and express any other concerns he may have. Diane stated that a signup sheet should be
created so Board members could be assigned to the various departments he or she feels they
would most relate to.
Under New Business:
Diane discussed the State of Alabama Open Meetings Act with those members in attendance.
Prior to the Board meeting, she consulted with Lisa Hanks, City Clerk, to gain an understanding
of the changes that have been made and the requirements of this Act. Under this Act, Board
members may not discuss through emails, telephone conversations, any social media or other
such meetings any information pertaining to issues that will be brought before the Council for a
vote as an Ordinance or Resolution. Board members may individually submit questions to
Chairman Thomas ; however, they may not submit any comments or discussions to each other.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:3 0 AM with first motion set
forth by Lorenzo Howard and second by Jenny Erdoes . I
The next meeting is scheduled for Thursday , August 4, 2016.
Respectfully submitted,
Pandora Heathcoe
Acting Secretary
Request for Qualifications Draft
Purpose:
The City of Fairhope Is requesting a statement of qualifications and a service
proposal from individual professionals and/or consulting finns to conduct a review
and modification to the current Compensation and Job Classification System
presently in use for all city employees . The purpose of the project is to review
the existing classification and compensation plan to ensure that all positions
within the City are and continue to be internally equitable and externally
competitive . The end product of the study, as detailed in this Scope of Services ,
will include recommendations for the following : revisions to the classification
schedule ; a wage comparison with comparable communities; updated pay
ranges based on the market salary survey ; a classification and procedure manual
to objectively evaluate new or revised positions following the conclusion of the
study and recommendations for compensation practices to be used in the future .
Background :
Fairhope , Alabama is a city of 18,000 located on the eastern shore of Mobile Bay
in Baldwin County , the fastest growing county in Alabama . There are many
factors that make Fairhope un ique among small Alabama towns, including : cfff-
wide emphasis on beautification and landscaping with awards from several
national organizations recognizing Fairhope's excellence In this area; three cit\1-
owned and operated utilities (electric , gas, and water/sewer) which provide I
services to the citizens and help support funding for City operations ; a city-owed
and operated municipal golf course ; outstanding recreation facilities and sports
programs for all ages and an active arts community which hosts one of the
largest arts and crafts fairs in the southeastern United States.
Fairhope operates with the Mayor/City Council fonn of government. As of August
1, 2016 , the City has full-time employees, part-time employees and
temporary employees under approximately 149 job classifications. Prior to 2012 ,
the City had no fonnal classification or compensation structure . In 2012, the City
Council implemented , through ordinance , a new salary structure based on a
classification and compensation study conducted by an outside consulting finn.
Annual cost of living increases for employees are tied to the municipal budget ,
and if appropriated , are awarded on or about October 1.
Scope of Work:
The City is seeking a highly qualified individual and/or finn to provide a quality,
thorough study . The selected individual and/orfinn will be required to interface
with employees and managers in an approachable manner. Presentation to "t
City Executives/Council and/or employee groups may be required. All products
and recommendations must comply with applicable State and Federal laws .
All documents and deliverables shall be provided in Microsoft Word or Excel
format on computer disk and in hard copy. All documents and deliverables
become the property of the City and the author or the firm shall have no copyright
interest. The City shall have the right to use all documents for any purpose .
1 Classifications and Job Grade Schedule :
• Review the current job classification system to determine if it effective ly
supports the city's current organizational structure . Assessment of FSLA
designation for each classification shall be induded in this review .
• Document any recommended changes to the classification system to
improve its effectiveness .
2 Compensation Analysis
• Conduct a total compensation survey of designated and benchmark
classifications using not only job titles, but duties and responsibilities
based upon the dassification specifications from the City of Fairhope . The
City must approve the list of comparable agencies used to provide a
competitive market analysis .
• Conduct a total compensation analysis to provide the City with an
accurate assessment of how its compensation plan compares with the
selected labor market agencies. The total compensation analysis includ"s
the employer cost for benefits including but not limited to: base salary ,
cash supplements , certification pay , standby pay, etc.
• Conduct analysis of employer paid insurance premium contributions for
health, dental, vision insurance , life insurance and AD&D insurance .
• Conduct an analysis of leave benefits including holidays , sick leave,
administrative leave and vacation .
• Based on that survey, prepare a comparative analysis that identifies the
City of Fairhope 's competitive position in the labor market. All information
comparing compensation of Fairhope classifications with those of other
municipalities or agencies should be presented in a form (tables , graphs)
which is easily understood and interpreted by City officials and citizens
who do not have a human resources background .
3 Compensation Schedule
• Using the market survey results and comparable job descriptions , the
consultant shall make recommendatiOns to retain , modify and/or change
the compensation schedule to correspond to the classification plan as
approved by the City.
! Classification and Compensation Manual
• Provide a classification and compensation manual for the City
Staff/Human Resources which outlines the steps to be used to
objectively evaluate and determine the grade of new or revised positions[
This manual should include detailed instructions which describe the ,
sequence , responsible parties, and relevant criteria used to address
proposed revisions and expected challenges to new classifications.
• In addition, this manual should include specific guidance for, but not
limited to the following :
Recommendations for compensation practices including: COLA
increases, merit pay, pay for performance , steps or open ranges,
frequency for increases in base pay, ways to compensate
employees who have reached top of pay range for their grade,
determination of starting salary for new hire, determination of percent
pay increase for promotions, etc.
5 . Outline of Procedure to Use in Adjusting Ranges on Regular Basis
• Provide information and instructions to allow City staff/Human
Resources to conduct audits and recommend adjustments consistent
with study methods. The instructions should detail the circumstances and
frequency for adjustment, the type of data to be collected and the method
for weighting information to make final adjustment recommendation.
6 . Contract Milestones :
The consultants may request additional milestones and interactions with
relevant personnel, but the following milestones will be required:
• Kickoff meeting (0% project complete):
o Who should attend
o Establishment of weekly status calls with the City HR director
o Review of roles and expectations from the City and the Contractor
o Contractor to review an overview of their expected process for
project completion
o Opportunity for questions and answers about process and
resources available to the Contractor
o Scheduling remaining project milestones
• Preliminary findings and approach review (25% project complete):
o Contractor to brief the City on initial finding progress and the
planned approach for achieving future milestones
o Contractor to share any identified risks to future milestones or
quality of results along with proposed mitigation of each risk
• Compensation plan approval (50% project complete):
o Contractor to present recommended revised compensation pla n
City approval in advance of compensation schedule draft
o City to provide feedback for any necessary revisions to the
proposed compensation plan
• First draft deliverable review (75% project complete):
o Contractor to present first draft of all deliverables to the City with
available data and information for City feedback
o Contractor to share any identified risks to future milestones or
quality of results along with proposed mitigation of each risk
o Contractor to present plan and approach for project completion
• Preliminary final draft review (90% project complete):
o Contractor to present a final draft of all deliverables to the City
available data and information for City feedback
o Contractor to identify how feedback of first draft was addressed
o Contractor to share any identified risks to future milestones or
quality of results along with proposed mitigation of each risk
o Contractor and City to identify remaining tasks necessary for
project completion
o Contractor to present plan for completing remaining tasks
• Project completion presentation (100% project complete):
o Contractor to present final deliverables to the City induding
a comprehensive presentation in-person summarizing the written
report inclusive of a PowerPoint dOaJment to be given on up to
four occasions induding to the Fairhope City Council, the Mayor
and department managers , and other groups as determined by
the City.